Oxford Calculus: Fourier Series Derivation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @larzcaetano
    @larzcaetano 2 роки тому +71

    Finally!!! Please, make a derivation of Laplace Transform!

  • @nychan2939
    @nychan2939 Рік тому +39

    I appreciate you really did the integrations and didn't just state the results.

  • @griffinarcher2911
    @griffinarcher2911 4 місяці тому +3

    So grateful for these videos. I watched some other lectures from big universities and they don't really explain anything, just write terms on the board and expect it to be understood. You're a great teacher and I feel that I finally understand this topic; I always have a lot of questions that go unanswered in other videos so I appreciate the way you explain your steps thoroughly. Great video!

  • @leeris19
    @leeris19 7 місяців тому +1

    I am a computer science student, currently delving around machine learning and it brought me here. I once again am reminded of how beautiful mathematics can be!

  • @doyouknowdawae2625
    @doyouknowdawae2625 2 місяці тому +1

    you explained it so well i could skip through a lot and still understand it completely, my math professor didn't want to cover the basics, so thank you for going over them.

  • @Sasham4
    @Sasham4 3 місяці тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @ed.puckett
    @ed.puckett 2 роки тому +8

    Thank you for talking about the interchange of summation and integration and the property of uniform convergence!

  • @MynulShanto
    @MynulShanto 8 місяців тому

    Perhaps this is the easiest video on Fourier series on UA-cam. Doing integration ( specially showing the value of delta (mn) ) makes this video unique. That's why I easily grasped the concept how to identify the co-effcient. Thanks a lot. My professor just messed up the topic and made it hard to learn.

  • @JosephJoestar_420
    @JosephJoestar_420 Рік тому +4

    Studying physics rn, this helped soooooo much! Thx!!!

  • @leophoenixmusic
    @leophoenixmusic 2 роки тому +8

    Great video!
    Adding to the list of people suggesting this: would love to see how to derive the Fourier transform from Fourier series. 😊

  • @KenStarkey
    @KenStarkey 2 роки тому +6

    I loved the derivation. I could only imagine how Fourier felt when he derived or invented this. Seems so clear but we know some steps.
    Also reversing the sum with the integral you said we know it converges to f(x). I thought that was what you were trying to prove.

  • @NikitaPetrovich-zy7hp
    @NikitaPetrovich-zy7hp 5 місяців тому

    Why did u decide to integrate this eqation on 23:12 ?

  • @M.athematech
    @M.athematech 2 роки тому +3

    For orthogonality, for m=n, you only covered m=n>0, the case m=n=0 has to be treated as a special case or else you are again dividing by 0.

    • @miguelf218
      @miguelf218 4 місяці тому

      I think he didn't considered it bc he was working with positive integers

  • @physicsadhyaapak
    @physicsadhyaapak 2 роки тому +2

    Please make a video on Fourier, Laplace Transforms and Special Functions such as Bessel functions, Hermite , Legendre Functions.

  • @KaiKunstmann
    @KaiKunstmann 2 роки тому +3

    Each of the 3 positions contains each decimal digit 1/10 of the time (if you count leading zeros). So each digit appears 3×1000/10 = 300 times.
    More generally: In a list of all possible n-positional integers (allowing for leading zeros) each base-b digit appears exactly n·b^(n-1) times, e.g. b=10 and n=3 is 3·10^(3-1) = 3·10² = 300.

    • @thefourshowflip
      @thefourshowflip 2 роки тому +1

      That seems way easier than how I did it lol. My approach was:
      There’s 10 in the first 99 in the ones space (1,…,91) and then 10 more for #s 10-19, giving 20 total in 1-99; this repeats 9 more times for each set of 100 numbers giving 200 total, but then there will be 100 more for every number 100-199 (from the hundreds place) given a grand total of 300😊

  • @TomRocksMaths
    @TomRocksMaths  2 роки тому +2

    Accompanying FREE worksheet courtesy of Maple Learn here: learn.maplesoft.com/d/DLEJJJNPPUILFLPNCTLRGSJHCTMHCRDJCTAUIRKKGSGPBSFHJNIFNRPODNPFBLJROIHMNIPIOUKLPHNIILISJMFLKULTNLGPHGNS

  • @evazhang3232
    @evazhang3232 Рік тому

    integration of cos would not be 0 at 30:43, would you please double check when you get a chance please?

    • @iamjojo999
      @iamjojo999 Рік тому

      It's indded 0, if you plot cos(npix/L) on 2d, you will see that integral is the sum of area over -L to L
      Although cos is an odd function, but this integral will be still 0 due to area between x=0 to L/2 is the same of x=2/L to L. One is posivte,the other is negative,so they canceled out. For area between x=0 to -L is the same.

  • @nickbishop959
    @nickbishop959 2 роки тому +2

    Probably pretty low-brow for you, but can you do one on induction proofs?

  • @Academy-w1r
    @Academy-w1r 11 місяців тому

    Hi. Im a 11th grade student. I didnt understand the part where: integrating the sin function, then inputting x=L gives zero (while deriving last RHS term for a0). I get why it happens for a cos function, we integrate it and it becomes sin, and every integer multiple of pi for sin is 0..... but for sin when we integrate, it become cos function... which is not 0 at every integral multiple of pi right? If you could clarify this doubt asap it'd be of help

  • @dmitriiefimov2134
    @dmitriiefimov2134 2 роки тому

    Oh my, just came a minute shy to the end :) Tom, is there a way to describe a FT in terms of SU(2) Lie group? And I didn't watch the video yet - just in case the answer is out there - I'll do in a moment!

  • @dennisyang9147
    @dennisyang9147 2 роки тому +1

    Hi Tom can you make a video testing the new AI chatGPT's maths skills by asking it a bunch of maths questions. I've used it a couple of times and it seems to be quite knowledgeable to a degree.

    • @snared_
      @snared_ 2 роки тому +1

      I had the opposite experience. It came upw ith some incorrect proofs for me but confidently thought they were correct.

  • @michaelmapple8201
    @michaelmapple8201 Рік тому

    16:00 Odd number times even number is even. Got a bit confused for a while

    • @evazhang3232
      @evazhang3232 Рік тому

      odd times even is odd

    • @wiggles7976
      @wiggles7976 Рік тому

      @@evazhang3232 0*1=0. In the integers, even times odd is even. It appears this is not analogous to odd and even functions, but this was just a passing remark that was irrelevant so it doesn't matter that it was wrong.

  • @Varalice
    @Varalice 3 місяці тому +1

    damn that's so helpful, thanks

  • @israelruiz2906
    @israelruiz2906 2 роки тому +1

    I am very interested with!

  • @mansoorshaik2123
    @mansoorshaik2123 Рік тому

    too good bro. loved it

  • @beachboardfan9544
    @beachboardfan9544 2 роки тому

    Is that an english thing, using the tall S as delta instead of the triangle?

    • @MxIraAram
      @MxIraAram 2 роки тому +3

      it's the small letter delta.

    • @beachboardfan9544
      @beachboardfan9544 2 роки тому +1

      @@MxIraAram Whats that mean? The triangle is only for numbers?

    • @ste1l1
      @ste1l1 2 роки тому +4

      @@beachboardfan9544 Delta is a character from the greek alphabet. Just as in the roman alphabet, they have upper- and lowe-case characters. The lower-case delta is the "S" and the upper-case delta is the triangle.

    • @beachboardfan9544
      @beachboardfan9544 2 роки тому +1

      @@ste1l1 Ahh thanks!

    • @aug3842
      @aug3842 2 роки тому +1

      capital Δ lowercase δ

  • @TomLeg
    @TomLeg 10 місяців тому

    The sun(x) is a new one to me! :-)

  • @godlyradmehr2004
    @godlyradmehr2004 2 роки тому

    Really im wating for that

  • @albinbiju1700
    @albinbiju1700 2 місяці тому

    Why is there no video on the internet giving a proof for the generalized by parts rule of integration? Is it just a mathematical trick without a proof or....simply put wtf is it??

  • @mariadelourdesaniessanchez9731
    @mariadelourdesaniessanchez9731 2 роки тому

    I think the school is good

  • @mikaramajlisbhai7315
    @mikaramajlisbhai7315 Рік тому

    Does this guy have a youtube tattoo??? Wild.

  • @shriramgunasekar9794
    @shriramgunasekar9794 2 роки тому

    A derivation of the fast fourier transform pwease

  • @mariadelourdesaniessanchez9731
    @mariadelourdesaniessanchez9731 2 роки тому

    I feel help me the school please

  • @mariadelourdesaniessanchez9731
    @mariadelourdesaniessanchez9731 2 роки тому

    Iam doing

  • @tj_1260
    @tj_1260 2 роки тому

    Ouhhh

  • @emet744
    @emet744 Рік тому

    Wow, what kind of a lunatic does this this to his body?

    • @exoticcoder5365
      @exoticcoder5365 Рік тому

      You are extremely rude, what kind of a lunatic you are to leave such rude comment