Oxford Calculus: Jacobians Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 вер 2021
  • University of Oxford mathematician Dr Tom Crawford explains how to calculate the Jacobian for a 2D coordinate change and applies the general formula to polar coordinates.
    Test yourself with some exercises on calculating Jacobians for parabolic, hyperbolic and spherical polar coordinates with this FREE worksheet in Maple Learn: learn.maplesoft.com/index.htm...
    We begin with a discussion of when it is appropriate to change coordinates in an integral and how area calculations work in general. This is then exemplified with the unit circle and switching from Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates where the Jacobian - or ‘stretch factor’ - is given by r.
    We then derive the general formula for a 2D Jacobian using a geometrical approach and the deformation of a rectangle to a parallelogram. Finally, the general formula is used to verify the earlier result of the area of the unit circle being equal to pi.
    Check your working using the Maple Calculator App - available for free on Google Play and the App Store.
    Android: play.google.com/store/apps/de...
    Apple: apps.apple.com/us/app/maple-c...
    Other videos in the Oxford Calculus series can be found here: • Oxford Calculus
    Finding critical points for functions of several variables: • Oxford Calculus: Findi...
    Classifying critical points using the method of the discriminant: • Oxford Calculus: Class...
    Partial differentiation explained: • Oxford Calculus: Parti...
    Second order linear differential equations: • Oxford Mathematics Ope...
    Integrating factors explained: • Oxford Calculus: Integ...
    Solving simple PDEs: • Oxford Calculus: Solvi...
    Find out more about the Maple Calculator App and Maple Learn on the Maplesoft UA-cam channel: / @maplesoft
    Produced by Dr Tom Crawford at the University of Oxford. Tom is an Early-Career Teaching and Outreach Fellow at St Edmund Hall: www.seh.ox.ac.uk/people/tom-c...
    For more maths content check out Tom's website tomrocksmaths.com/
    You can also follow Tom on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram @tomrocksmaths.
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    Get your Tom Rocks Maths merchandise here:
    beautifulequations.net/collec...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 364

  • @TomRocksMaths
    @TomRocksMaths  2 роки тому +57

    Check out the full 'Oxford Calculus' series here: ua-cam.com/play/PLMCRxGutHqflZoTY8JCm1GRzCdGXvZ3_S.html

    • @THEMATT222
      @THEMATT222 2 роки тому +1

      👍👍👍

    • @ranam
      @ranam 2 роки тому +1

      the jacobian has an rate of scaling under transformation and jacobians are the true derivative and finding the correct scaling factors from determinants to make the explosion in Riemannian rectangles of the integrals the error converges with infinite sum so the scaling factor is there to rectify the error rate in convergence in rectangles under transformation the rectangles explode and contract and at miniature scale the each point under transformation has the scaling factor

  • @shashwatkumar6536
    @shashwatkumar6536 2 роки тому +283

    You're exactly like how Machine Gun Kelly would have looked if he taught Calculus

  • @abbe23456789
    @abbe23456789 2 роки тому +200

    Feels great to know why the Jacobian comes into the calculations when switching coordinate systems. I never learned that while doing multivariate calculus this past semester. Keep up the good work! Regards from a fellow math nerd from Sweden.

    • @SquidBeats
      @SquidBeats 2 роки тому

      Jesus Christ is God Almighty, The everlasting Father !

    • @sachin-mavi
      @sachin-mavi 2 роки тому

      Its multivariable calculus, not multivariate calculus.
      there is a difference ...
      rest everything is affirmative ...

    • @pyropulseIXXI
      @pyropulseIXXI Рік тому +6

      @@sachin-mavi multivariable and multivariate calculus are the same thing yo uoaf

    • @bb5k947
      @bb5k947 Рік тому

      🤓

    • @bb5k947
      @bb5k947 Рік тому

      @@SquidBeats amen

  • @megistone
    @megistone Рік тому +16

    I'm shocked how you've packed many topics such as vector product, Jacobian, areas, and more into such a video, while clearly explaining Jacobian, the main topic. Even if I don't speak English well I can understand it and it is very interesting to watch the explanation and behavior as if you are transmitting energy to the viewer. I'm very satisfied.

  • @leocheung2578
    @leocheung2578 Рік тому +12

    Hey there! The second you explained the Jacobian as the stretch factor of converting from one coordinate system to another, I understood it so much better! This was so much better of an explanation than my textbook

  • @davidgillies620
    @davidgillies620 2 роки тому +21

    This really should be taught at A-level rather than first-year undergrad courses. Jacobians act as a nice sliproad onto the main highway of tensors and differential geometry in general, whose introduction is in turn often delayed (or even omitted) at bachelor's level.

  • @likithstochastic
    @likithstochastic 2 роки тому +8

    Thanks! That was explained in an intuitive way. I guess the key here is to think of the elemental rectangular areas changing in to rotated parallelograms during the coordinate transformation. The example you gave in the beginning with regard to the area of the circle makes the concept clearer.

  • @dmc-au
    @dmc-au 2 роки тому +55

    I brushed across the Jacobian while learning statistics recently. It seemed reasonable that we'd need to scale by the change of space in that context, but this video made it concrete as to what was going on behind the scenes. Thanks, Tom!

  • @Deviated88
    @Deviated88 2 роки тому +12

    I envy the ability to be good and understand math, I’m doing intermediate algebra right now in college and I’m having a hard time grasping the concept. Love your videos, keep it up!

  • @AcryllixGD
    @AcryllixGD Рік тому +5

    This is such a fantastic video! I'm currently in year 13, thinking of doing a maths degree, im fascinated with calculus, its by far my favourite aspect of maths, not only did multivariable integration make sense but also the use of determinants. Amazing video!

  • @saraswatasensarma6041
    @saraswatasensarma6041 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much. I am a first year Maths student from India, and these simple yet beautiful concepts are what keep mathematics in my heart. Keep up the great work Sir!!

  • @daniellund3840
    @daniellund3840 2 роки тому +4

    Absolutely love this video, currently in the process of studying vector calculus (and some other stuff I also don't understand) for machine learning and struggled to wrap my head around jacobian's, this makes so much more sense now

  • @facr
    @facr 2 роки тому +6

    And this works so well also for triple integrals and volume calculations. Nice video. Greets!

  • @prille09
    @prille09 2 роки тому +14

    I love your explainations, I now have a better understanding of what I’ve learned in the past 😊 thanks so much for your videos

  • @TomiThemself
    @TomiThemself 2 місяці тому

    Tom never fails to explain what seem as hard mathematical concepts, in really easy way. Thank You!

  • @jackflash8756
    @jackflash8756 2 місяці тому

    Best intuitive explanation that I've seen so far and for once , even with my weak maths knowledge , understood it for the 1st time. Other youtube presentations never clicked with me but this one did.

  • @sarkiskaralian1765
    @sarkiskaralian1765 2 роки тому +7

    You sir are a very valuable math resource for students and perhaps even teachers. Thank you!

  • @jeffersonluizbento20
    @jeffersonluizbento20 2 роки тому +4

    Excelente explicação. Foi a primeira vez que vi Jacobiano explicado de forma tão simples.

  • @paulmcghee6160
    @paulmcghee6160 2 роки тому +11

    Thanks for your exceptional work Tom. I've got a degree in maths and still learning little things like this really makes sure I keep lifting my knowledge.
    You're putting a load of effort into these videos. It is greatly appreciated.

  • @science-therealfun4765
    @science-therealfun4765 2 роки тому +6

    This video is too good. So informative and he explained such a difficult calculation so easily. Hats off and keep it up.Thanks Tom👍❤

  • @starsun7455
    @starsun7455 2 роки тому +5

    I always feel grateful for sharing your high-level lectures on UA-cam. you are cool.

  • @LucasVieira-ob6fx
    @LucasVieira-ob6fx 2 роки тому +1

    This is by far the most comprehensible explanation of the Jacobian I've ever found. Nice work!

  • @kevindegryse9750
    @kevindegryse9750 2 роки тому +4

    I already knew how to use change of coordinates and Jacobian. But it is actually the first time I understand the geometric meaning of it :)
    Thank you

  • @jamesjohnson2394
    @jamesjohnson2394 2 роки тому +3

    Tom I really like your videos. You're taking complex ideas and really explaining them clearly and you're very good at presenting!. Thank you for taking the time in doing them! they're very helpful!
    I'd say you're very good at this so keep up the great work! :)

  • @RC32Smiths01
    @RC32Smiths01 2 роки тому +37

    Thank you for always providing such valuable learning content!

  • @antoniofernandesdequeiroga6197

    Congratulation to Tom for introducing the geometrical concept of Jacobian in a very clear manner.(Brazil).

  • @johnchristian5027
    @johnchristian5027 2 роки тому +1

    This was a great video for self learning multivariable calculus, nice!

  • @sabzimatic
    @sabzimatic Рік тому +4

    Today I understood what Jacobian really means. Thank you.

  • @nahuelleiva8460
    @nahuelleiva8460 2 роки тому +1

    Nice video. I remember studying the Jacobian and the conversion from cartographic to polar coordinates during my degree career, good times. I remember too that these concepts could be applied to Physics but that was another thing that I didn't engage with haha

  • @gossipGirlMegan
    @gossipGirlMegan Рік тому +1

    hi,professor,very helpful and very straightfoward, many thanks to you ,great expaination!!!

  • @srikrishoo7
    @srikrishoo7 6 місяців тому

    Hey there, this has really helped me to make my concepts better, thanks for the work which u have done brother😊

  • @dv5855
    @dv5855 2 роки тому +3

    What a mesmerizing presentation. I had math through differential equations at university thirty-five years ago. If you had given lectures, such as you present here, perhaps the 4.0 GPA achieved would had met something. Grade Inflation was in full bloom. Thank you.

  • @actualBIAS
    @actualBIAS 4 місяці тому

    Bro, for real. As one of your generation I am happy to see that you stood consistent with the style of our generation.

  • @jpmagnos
    @jpmagnos 2 роки тому +3

    You really are saving me in university... I feel like I can understand where things comes from and why they are the way they are when you explain it... much better than my university professor who is more interested in making us fail class

    • @pyropulseIXXI
      @pyropulseIXXI Рік тому +2

      This is super funny, because this is literally just out of the textbook. Maybe if you oafs read the textbook, you'd learn something. I tutor math and physics, and people say the same thing to me. "You make it so much easier than the professor, and you actually explain where it comes from!"
      This jacobian 'proof' is straight out of any Calculus textbook

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 2 роки тому

    Great visualization! That's how you make math accessible for a larger public. Good stuff.

  • @user-zz9kz9xq2m
    @user-zz9kz9xq2m Рік тому +1

    Excellent explanation. Thank you very much

  • @jdubyabreh
    @jdubyabreh 2 роки тому

    Excellent video. I wish all teachers were like you!

  • @hreader
    @hreader 2 роки тому +2

    I've already got the Maple Calculator! And very useful it is, too, especially as you say for visualisation.

  • @sabahhadhood603
    @sabahhadhood603 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks a lot. An outstanding lecture.

  • @just_another_wandering_soul
    @just_another_wandering_soul Рік тому +1

    Amazing lecture! Thank you so much...

  • @jameshamilton356
    @jameshamilton356 2 роки тому +2

    OMG! You are the best teacher to explain complex subjects.

  • @blakejohnson4834
    @blakejohnson4834 2 роки тому +2

    Hi Tom. I come from practically 0 background of mathematics. I enjoy these videos however as you’re concise with your explanations and breakdown the overall operation to the basics in a sense.
    I think I may dive into mathematics at some stage and see more what it’s all about.
    Take care my man !
    With love from Australia

  • @nareshmehndiratta
    @nareshmehndiratta 2 роки тому +9

    congratulatons, please make use of maths in simplifying the wonders of theoretical physics

  • @mimithewienerdog6928
    @mimithewienerdog6928 2 роки тому +1

    really nice explanation!

  • @seanlynch6323
    @seanlynch6323 2 роки тому

    I took calc 2 at my university my freshman year and never new where that rdrd0 came from when switching from Cartesian to polar coordinates. Brilliant visualization + explanation!

  • @erikross-rnnow5517
    @erikross-rnnow5517 2 роки тому +22

    Whenever I encounter double integrals of some version of the unit circle I’ve always been frustrated by the sudden appearance of the r term in rdrdtheta. But thanks to your wonderful explanation It finally begins to make a little sense :))

    • @Rene_Christensen
      @Rene_Christensen 2 роки тому +2

      The further you go out radially, the bigger the area you sweep for a given angle.

  • @chrisgreen_1729
    @chrisgreen_1729 2 роки тому +1

    Wow, that's a really clear explanation! Thanks so much!

  • @Fomalhaut0802
    @Fomalhaut0802 2 роки тому +2

    Nice explainings! Huge thanks and greetings from Spain!

  • @ian-haggerty
    @ian-haggerty Рік тому +1

    Defining basis vectors as the rate of change of position vector would make this clearer: i = dR / dx, j = dR / dy, dA = |(dx * i) x (dy * j)|. The Jacobian naturally springs up when considering change of coordinates under these definitions. You don't need to rely on cartesian and the area element is well defined.

  • @maxwellsequation4887
    @maxwellsequation4887 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you sir for creating such a brilliant lecture ☺️

  • @arthurcpiazzi
    @arthurcpiazzi 2 роки тому +2

    Best lecture about this subject I ever seen 👏👏👏

  • @user-sv1fr9qj2b
    @user-sv1fr9qj2b Рік тому +1

    That is so brilliant! Thank you so much❤️

  • @thinkingabout5641
    @thinkingabout5641 2 роки тому +2

    Это было впечатляющее объяснение. Огромное спасибо 👍

  • @umumuntuksemua9831
    @umumuntuksemua9831 2 роки тому

    Yes finally your video that i watch for college, not for leisure!!!

  • @elijahhallbasketball
    @elijahhallbasketball 2 роки тому +1

    Wow I'm speechless this video is so amazing

  • @manfredvonrichtofen3863
    @manfredvonrichtofen3863 4 місяці тому

    Thank you so much, theoretical physics is soooo much easier with your explanation for the mathematical concepts ♥️

  • @rianby64
    @rianby64 2 роки тому +1

    nice explanation! thank you so much for this video! )))

  • @ibrarhussain4868
    @ibrarhussain4868 4 місяці тому

    best explaination ever seen of this topic

  • @christianorlandosilvaforer3451
    @christianorlandosilvaforer3451 2 роки тому +1

    great!!!! awesome explanations greetings from colombia

  • @shresthshankhdhar375
    @shresthshankhdhar375 6 місяців тому

    great explanation i am speechless 🙇

  • @rkversouryaanteon3120
    @rkversouryaanteon3120 2 роки тому +1

    Great discussion

  • @billthon1099
    @billthon1099 7 місяців тому

    Love this chap, i could easily learn from him.

  • @andyrodrigoalvarado118
    @andyrodrigoalvarado118 2 роки тому

    so intuitive explanation, thanks dude

  • @cesarluishernandezpertuz8794

    Wow, realmente este canal......es mi mejor descubrimiento en UA-cam. ..

  • @omundofisica9785
    @omundofisica9785 2 роки тому

    Very good! Congratulations!

  • @abdulrahmanmahmoudanter8829
    @abdulrahmanmahmoudanter8829 2 роки тому +2

    Using the differential approximation of x,y as functions os r and theta I think of the Jacobian matrix as the linear transformation that acts upon the space of dr and dtheta and the determinant of it as the stretch factor, I don't know if this is the formal way but i like it 😂

  • @fredg8328
    @fredg8328 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this nice explanation. I remember I learned Jacobians at Univertisty 20 years ago, but I totallly forgot about them.

  • @amansinghchoudhary
    @amansinghchoudhary 2 роки тому +2

    Man I love these videos

  • @user-ye5fw7hi8e
    @user-ye5fw7hi8e 2 роки тому +1

    thanks, best explanation of Jacobian I found!

  • @SOPHOCLESIFY
    @SOPHOCLESIFY Рік тому

    I'm finally learning at school the sort of material he talks about in this channel, feels a bit like a milestone haha.

  • @shubhamsnehil6145
    @shubhamsnehil6145 2 роки тому +2

    Excited 😊😊

  • @AJ-et3vf
    @AJ-et3vf 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome video. Thank you

  • @noelnakka1056
    @noelnakka1056 Рік тому

    what an wonderful explainantion by you .love you bro from india

  • @winstonong9593
    @winstonong9593 2 роки тому +1

    Great explanation!

  • @boukharroubamediane119
    @boukharroubamediane119 2 роки тому +2

    Nicely and clearly explained.
    To be grateful to your video, I thank you, subscribe, like and share.👍

  • @its_robbietime1333
    @its_robbietime1333 2 роки тому +1

    ive never seen a scene mathematician but im digging it

  • @henrymarkson3758
    @henrymarkson3758 2 роки тому +2

    Demystifying the Jacobian in 30 minutes. Nicely done.

  • @kleberfigueroa7473
    @kleberfigueroa7473 2 роки тому

    I saw this video days later, and today I was studying about soil mechanics where related this video content. And I thought "Oh, I saw this in a video on UA-cam". Regards from Ecuador!

  • @etharalali
    @etharalali 2 роки тому +1

    I wish I had been taught Jacobians this way many moons ago tbh. Well done Tom

  • @RaviShankar-jm1qw
    @RaviShankar-jm1qw 8 місяців тому

    Mindblowing video.. Subscribed :)

  • @professormarcelodamata1089
    @professormarcelodamata1089 2 роки тому

    Congratulations!!! It could extend to the Hessians without restriction and to the restricted.

  • @nestorv7627
    @nestorv7627 2 роки тому +2

    Instead of giving a vague argument for approximating the curvy rectangle in polar as a "normal" rectangle, you could've simply derived the area for an annular sector:
    The area of an annulus is
    A = π(b² - a²), b>a
    So that the area of an annular sector is
    A = π(b² - a²) × θ/2π
    Now let a=r, b=r + dr, and θ -> dθ
    Which gives the area of an infinitesimal annular sector:
    dA = [(r + dr)² - r²] dθ /2 = (r² +2r dr + dr² - r²) dθ = r dr dθ

  • @seriktabussov5892
    @seriktabussov5892 10 місяців тому

    you are great teacher

  • @77tigers26
    @77tigers26 2 роки тому +2

    very informative!

  • @samshaven3573
    @samshaven3573 2 роки тому +1

    Heych! So nice to hear.

  • @NateCrownwell
    @NateCrownwell 2 роки тому +1

    Really cool, thank you :)

  • @Hackers-wrld
    @Hackers-wrld Рік тому +1

    I see MGK has had a career change, respect to Eminem. The gift that keeps on giving. Now we have a good math lecture.

  • @user-pl1mz8wc6f
    @user-pl1mz8wc6f 11 місяців тому

    26:32 I used to think that in 2x2 matrix, the 1st column represents the destination of original x vector, and 2nd col for the y vector. But it seems the transformed x and y vector can be either columns or rows respectively without changing its determinant.

  • @jagmairsinghgill3501
    @jagmairsinghgill3501 2 роки тому +1

    Great video. How you teach reminds me of Richard Feynman.

  • @crashandsideburns
    @crashandsideburns 2 роки тому +1

    Woah, I was just talking to a friend about Jacobians yesterday. What a coincidence!

  • @richardcasey4439
    @richardcasey4439 8 місяців тому

    This is very good

  • @zizo-ve8ib
    @zizo-ve8ib 2 роки тому +1

    Literally best Jacobian video I've seen so far (and I've been searching for a *long* time about it), just have a few things I was wondering
    1. Why do you do the u in the i direction and v in the j direction ?
    2. The very last part of the Jacobian you were writing J = (Xu Yv - Xv Yu) del u del v, and the double integral was like -> J du dv
    So I didn't really get the very last approximation

    • @RexxSchneider
      @RexxSchneider 9 місяців тому

      1. He didn't. He set x in the direction of the vector i and y in the direction of the vector j. He then set u in some arbitrary direction made up of one component of i and one component of j. Watch again from around 18:30 and you'll see that he transforms the vector i.dx into the vector (∂x/∂u).du.i + (∂x/∂v).dv.j. Similarly he sets up v in another arbitrary direction with i and j components. That transforms the vector j.dy into (∂y/∂u).du.i + (∂y/∂v).dv.j.
      2. For some reason, he needlessly switched to using the confusing notation Xu to mean ∂x/∂u, and similarly Xv=∂x.∂v, Yu=∂y/∂u, Yv=∂y/∂v. You won't be the only one confused by that.

  • @uselessstuff3133
    @uselessstuff3133 2 роки тому +1

    Jacobian is the basis in robotics task manipulation, if you understand it you can almost do everything that involves speed/kinetic energy.

  • @ashafaghi
    @ashafaghi 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent!

  • @matirachamim7223
    @matirachamim7223 2 роки тому

    20;25 I think there is a little mistake when you represent the transformed vector in the form of Original Cartesian and also when you write the Jacobian matrix .
    The result is the same because you change the location of two elements on the diagonal .

  • @drvanhelsingz5133
    @drvanhelsingz5133 Рік тому +1

    Amazing amazing stuff

  • @geekyprogrammer4831
    @geekyprogrammer4831 2 роки тому +1

    Don't judge this man by his attire and theme. He is pure genius.

  • @cogitoergocogito5032
    @cogitoergocogito5032 2 роки тому

    Good teaching on this bit tricky subject

  • @mitchellsteindler
    @mitchellsteindler 2 роки тому +7

    8 years after taking calculus, I finally understand wtf a jacobian is. Teachers have so little empathy for that their students don't ALREADY know this stuff, that they forget to try and really explain it. "Oh just make it r dr dtheta because that's you transform from rectangular to polar". What?

    • @tetrabromobisphenol
      @tetrabromobisphenol 2 роки тому

      The sign of a true master is humility. Those who feel the need to belittle students or obfuscate ideas are not intellectual heavyweights. The real masters are putting their efforts into solving serious problems and winning Fields Medals, not wasting their time flexing on undergrads.

    • @mitchellsteindler
      @mitchellsteindler 2 роки тому

      @@tetrabromobisphenol I'm talking about high school. Nobody was flexing on anybody...

    • @MarcAntoine1
      @MarcAntoine1 2 роки тому

      As an engineering student I can totally relate to this

  • @haroldvs
    @haroldvs 2 роки тому +2

    Now it all makes sense