From the homepage, reveal all specifications of chips, tubes and ARC, and upload actual photos. Then you don't have to prove it with a live broadcast anymore. It's a very simple problem.
What is taking so long for Nanox to ship some units? Why hasn't the FDA given any comments about the multi-source ARC? I thought the company said it could start selling in Nigeria, where FDA approval isn't even required.
Very, very important! The ARC is fake, but obviously an ARC-like device using regular dental tubes and $100,000-or-so fast detector is feasible - will it then work for tomosynthesis? Nope, unless the detector is even more expensive and faster! Tomosynthesis, unlike CT, is extremely sensitive to motion, due to the limited-angle and limited-number of projections (so, unable to correct motion errors). So, the limited factor is the detector (and its potential motion!), not the tubes. The speed of tilts is limiting, too. All this is irrelevant, though, as tomosynthesis (other than breast) is an obsolete and useless modality, hated universally by practicing radiologists as it wastes time without brining more benefits than regular x-ray. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria essentially state that tomosynthesis (other than breast) is never appropriate. And why waste $100,000+ on ARC tomosynthesis, when you can buy a decent CT for the same price?
There is minor Arc in Arc day? Arc’s core components, chips and tubes. Hi Sir Erez, we would like to know that Nanox proud specification of core component. I`m Choice on Twitter. And I trust Nanox technology. But I really eager to watch that true images of working functional tube in oil(isolation) bath and SEM images of MEMs Chip. Please Regard, Best wishes Choice.
@@RichardXRoe And they keep talking about CT. They are promoting a modality they don't provide. Additionally, I don't know if bragging about having 30 million patient records is exactly smart. Did these patients agree to wave the rights to their medical information? Sooner or later there is going to be a nasty class action lawsuit for violating HIPPA laws and quite frankly it can't come soon enough. Even if they claim to deidentify the images by removing patient data the images themselves could be used to identify a patient.
@@ReactsIII Nanox acquired some scam companies with stock, and they claim to do CT business. Zebra, now Nanox AI, was supposedly analyzing discarded CTs, while USARAD was supposedly getting a fee from teleradiology. Zebra's story is that Israel is very lax about privacy and that is how they got all these patient records (remember, HIPPA is a US Law, not an Israeli one). Of course, the entire Zebra story is a complete fabrication (and Israel happens to have a PPA).
We love this company. Just be patient. May take a couple years
Thanks For All Tips
I want to see you image a real live patient, as a matter of fact I would volunteer.
From the homepage, reveal all specifications of chips, tubes and ARC, and upload actual photos. Then you don't have to prove it with a live broadcast anymore. It's a very simple problem.
Only the FDA can prove yourself, Nanox.
Good luck for all investors.
Including me, lol.
What is taking so long for Nanox to ship some units? Why hasn't the FDA given any comments about the multi-source ARC? I thought the company said it could start selling in Nigeria, where FDA approval isn't even required.
Phantoms hold very still. How many milliseconds are the exposures on a breathing human? Motion would need to be eliminated.
Very, very important! The ARC is fake, but obviously an ARC-like device using regular dental tubes and $100,000-or-so fast detector is feasible - will it then work for tomosynthesis? Nope, unless the detector is even more expensive and faster! Tomosynthesis, unlike CT, is extremely sensitive to motion, due to the limited-angle and limited-number of projections (so, unable to correct motion errors). So, the limited factor is the detector (and its potential motion!), not the tubes. The speed of tilts is limiting, too. All this is irrelevant, though, as tomosynthesis (other than breast) is an obsolete and useless modality, hated universally by practicing radiologists as it wastes time without brining more benefits than regular x-ray. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria essentially state that tomosynthesis (other than breast) is never appropriate. And why waste $100,000+ on ARC tomosynthesis, when you can buy a decent CT for the same price?
한글 자막이 있으면 좋겠어요 저도 식구들이 주주라서 2년이 넘었네요
I have a lot of doubts.
Are there any ethical issues in the experiment?
Couldn't you have tested it with a Mormot rat?
There is minor Arc in Arc day?
Arc’s core components, chips and tubes.
Hi Sir Erez, we would like to know that Nanox proud specification of core component.
I`m Choice on Twitter. And I trust Nanox technology.
But I really eager to watch that true images of working functional tube in oil(isolation) bath and SEM images of MEMs Chip.
Please Regard, Best wishes Choice.
Go NANOX. It is a great product. It will be one of the most used medical device in the world.
Nope. It is fake. If you know what a chip is, you know that SOURCE is fake, so then ARC must be fake, too.
@@RichardXRoe I think you are fake.
@@bpolat I might be, but I have not raised millions under false pretenses with fake props, while falsely claiming I have "the technology."
@@RichardXRoe And they keep talking about CT. They are promoting a modality they don't provide. Additionally, I don't know if bragging about having 30 million patient records is exactly smart. Did these patients agree to wave the rights to their medical information? Sooner or later there is going to be a nasty class action lawsuit for violating HIPPA laws and quite frankly it can't come soon enough. Even if they claim to deidentify the images by removing patient data the images themselves could be used to identify a patient.
@@ReactsIII Nanox acquired some scam companies with stock, and they claim to do CT business. Zebra, now Nanox AI, was supposedly analyzing discarded CTs, while USARAD was supposedly getting a fee from teleradiology. Zebra's story is that Israel is very lax about privacy and that is how they got all these patient records (remember, HIPPA is a US Law, not an Israeli one). Of course, the entire Zebra story is a complete fabrication (and Israel happens to have a PPA).
실제 생물대상 라이브 공개해라! 어줍잖은
인형 시연 그만해라
2년째면 사기꾼 이다
Scam
사기꾼들
Scam!!!
It's been 2 years since 2020 rsna and we're still doing hands and feet? As a long term investor, this was disappointing