you have to get Kwame Nkrumah's books, he had 8 and read and you will understand the issues we all face as Africans. We don't go to school to be enlightened as Africans rather indoctrinated and we become useless not being able to produce anything of our own even our basic necessities are being produced by the west, east, south and north we are just useless. i blame not the whites but our poverty is a choice and we should live with it until we build the courage to stand on our own two feets.
Nukes are disadvantageous but Nuclear energy has exponential benefits, when explored. We will need to find a way around it. Africa seems to be the future. Those movies are now making more sense. Thanks for the informative content. Have to watch again, so much to learn.
South Africa was able to build nukes because of their president elected and other African that got independence before South Africa never had a white president in power...
Making nukes is the simplest technology that ever existed. It's the issue of separation of isotopes which any school lab is able to carry out. The six methods of isotope separation we have described so far (diffusion, distillation, centrifugation, thermal diffusion, exchange reactions, and electrolysis) have all been tried with some degree of success on either uranium or hydrogen or both.
In a world where weapons speak louder than reason We don't need anyone permission to do what is best for us. It's our god given right to defend our lives and land By Any means necessary
Lol😂😂 You dont gerrit at all, nuclear weapons are a liability in every possible way cause you xant use them plus nigeria would get invaded immediately and our lives will be at stake.
And that's why y'all lead the world in poverty and malnutrition. Poor thinking. Tribalism and no ingenuity. Most of Africa can't even feed itself or protect itself.
Africans don't need machine guns either, perhaps Africans can fight machine guns with spears. African and African nations need nuclear weapons to defend themselves against unforeseen variations in the world, whatever that may be. Nuclear weapons act as a failsafe or a barrier to protect yourselves. If you don't think so, why have machine guns, give up the machine guns too.
Why do you think Europe is able to exploit us?? I Will tell you because we don't have nukes.. that's WHY they can do with Africa whatever they want... India is in peace because they have nukes..
Africa is a peaceful Continent, our leaders just want generational wealth fir their families dey are not all about conquering other nations, if our leaders can manage their greed, I'm sure Africa will be better yhan Europe
The soviet union built Ajaokuta steel company which is said to possess nuclear reactor potential. It could generate nuclear powered electricity. Could it be why the Obasanjo administration was coarsed to handover the company to an american establishment? Could it be why this steel company may never function?
Britian, France and Israel invaded Egypt for nationalising its suez canal. Imagine the response if they developed nukes. Besides Egypt had good relations with the soviet union. It was partial the soviet threat to nuke London and Paris that led to the British and French leaving. So why have nukes when you have an ally that would use them on your behalf? It's free protection. South Africa felt it needed nukes because it wasn't friends with either the west or the east. It was isolated, so it felt no country would offer it such protection or retaliate on its behalf
Remember, Mandela was a marxist and we could not leave nuclear capabilities to a possible unstable communist regime. As for capabilities, South Africa still has all the knowledge and some tech, but this will never be made known or handed to the present government as they have proved themselves to be destroyers, not builders.
North Korea's nukes are not the biggest deterrent: the North Koreans don't have a delivery system. Instead the deterrent is the rocket and artillery arsenal that could destroy Seoul.
Japan and south Korea are in their range. They also got two nuclear superpower friends as neighbors. That's the reason north korea is able create its nuke weapons without much interference unlike Iran.
We just don't have the capability to build one ever since S.Africa under Britain ceased the operation. In fact the programme is costly and there is no need of it per now.
@DumaM-ir7rk what, I am saying is, South Africa cares about what's allowed and what's not allowed. That's why SA isn't strong enough to built it. Nigeria doesn't care permissions. They will built it no matter what. Even if it means sanctions or war. That's what it takes. That's why SA isn't strong enough to built it. But Nigeria will.
Thats stupid asf, nigerian cant and shouldnt...ok if nigeria builds nukes what would we use it to do??? No country has nuked another country excpet for PEARL HARBOUR because it makes no sense to do so cause it backfires and only people like me who work in nuclear industry will understand. The money they couldve have used to build nuclear weapons to kill your family members in the west(USA, UK, CANADA) could be used to build nuclear power plant to power your fridge and PS5 and everyone is belle full and happy FULL STOP.
African countries have more pressing socioeconomic needs than acquisition of nuclear arsenals. It's also capital intensive to develop, secure and maintain nuclear weapons. No country in Africa is currently facing an existential threat to justify the nuclear deterrent option. This may change in the future.
Even though I am a fan of your videos and usually your train of thought, I believe that there are more reasons for no African countries at present having no nukes. First, African countries tend to be far more unstable as to their governments. Say what you want to say about the US, Russia, China, India, France, UK, India and Israel, but they don't tend to have coups every couple of years. Not even north Korea. Pakistan does have them and they are the wildcard as to the stability of their regime, and, given that they tend to be on the more islamist side, so therefore are a threat if Islamic terrorists get their hands on it. And before anyone says the US bombed Japan in World War 2, yes, they did, they ended the war without the need for an armed invasion, protected Japan from the incoming Soviet invasion that would have made a German style scenario in Japan and haven't used them in anger since August 1945. Do you think a person like Chad's Habre, or the Central African Emperor Boukase wouldn't have used them? Furthermore, nukes are extremely expensive to build, maintain, secure and launch. Every 5 years, the tritium must be refurbished, at between $100k to $1 million dollars. And that doesn't even include your required industrial base, large amounts of scientists and researchers. If a more developed country like Iran can't master them in 20 years, more scientifically backwards African countries can't reach that goal, while battling hunger and building basic utility and educational infrastructure. So, my conclusion is that, Africa, at present, doesn't need, can't finance them, or have the technical capabilities. In the future, if Africa continues developing and it's economy grows and politics stabilizes, I can see them having the bomb responsibly, but not at present and under current conditions... Too much must be solved first
Each nuke costs many millions of dollars to construct and a few million dollars a year to maintain. The only countries that could realistically have them are south African countries because you need to keep them away from extremist groups. That money can be better spent improving the lives of the people.
@@graver0bber not just few millions, it cost hundreds of millions to maintain in a year , so it is logical to stop the whole nuclear program and spending so much money on something you don't know when you will use , besides an accident can happen which can contaminate the whole country and part of neighboring countries with radiation, we haven't even talked about security we all know how poor security in africa is , and a nuclear bomb is like a gold chest for terrorist sect imagine a terrorist sect having possession of a nuke.
I@@graver0bber if north Korea and Israel have them,why can't Africa they have more resources than north Korea and Israel combined, it's the European oppressor that is the blockage 😢
you have to get Kwame Nkrumah's books, he had 8 and read and you will understand the issues we all face as Africans. We don't go to school to be enlightened as Africans rather indoctrinated and we become useless not being able to produce anything of our own even our basic necessities are being produced by the west, east, south and north we are just useless. i blame not the whites but our poverty is a choice and we should live with it until we build the courage to stand on our own two feets.
❤
Love from South Africa....
Great information, analysis and packaging Sir!
Nukes are disadvantageous but Nuclear energy has exponential benefits, when explored.
We will need to find a way around it.
Africa seems to be the future.
Those movies are now making more sense.
Thanks for the informative content.
Have to watch again, so much to learn.
Tell that to Gadaffi
@@GreenKC😂
Astonishing Content!
Thank you sir for great content not these nyash related content well done sir❤
You don watch all those ones taya😂
I love the Suit. Keep it up
I like when you upload... Good job..
when i see judebela video i click.
Best content creator 🎉❤
Great VIdeo Jude.
Great video 💥👌
Imagine of Boko Haram got a nuke
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Let them feed, educate, power, and properly hospitalize themselves first
Why African countries that got independence before South Africa 🇿🇦 didn’t have to build nuclear weapons.
😅😅
Yea, right.
South Africa was able to build nukes because of their president elected and other African that got independence before South Africa never had a white president in power...
What I've always wanted to know WHO GAVE APARTHEID SOUTH AFRIKA NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
Israel
@@briopalumpus8676 Thank you very much. I hope all the Black people who think the Zionist like them... Think again, we are their ENEMY. 🙁😈
Israel
But also remember South Africa have the technology to build nuclear weapons.
I disagree… Africa needs nukes but the continent’s countries must unify and establish intercontinental trade first. It can’t afford to stay as is.
Making nukes is the simplest technology that ever existed. It's the issue of separation of isotopes which any school lab is able to carry out. The six methods of isotope separation we have described so far (diffusion, distillation, centrifugation, thermal diffusion, exchange reactions, and electrolysis) have all been tried with some degree of success on either uranium or hydrogen or both.
Interesting...
In a world where weapons speak louder than reason
We don't need anyone permission to do what is best for us. It's our god given right to defend our lives and land
By Any means necessary
Lol😂😂
You dont gerrit at all, nuclear weapons are a liability in every possible way cause you xant use them plus nigeria would get invaded immediately and our lives will be at stake.
Good video, left for me I’ll say we Africans don’t need nuclear weapons
Totally agree
And that's why y'all lead the world in poverty and malnutrition. Poor thinking. Tribalism and no ingenuity. Most of Africa can't even feed itself or protect itself.
Africans don't need machine guns either, perhaps Africans can fight machine guns with spears. African and African nations need nuclear weapons to defend themselves against unforeseen variations in the world, whatever that may be. Nuclear weapons act as a failsafe or a barrier to protect yourselves. If you don't think so, why have machine guns, give up the machine guns too.
Why not
Why do you think Europe is able to exploit us?? I Will tell you because we don't have nukes.. that's WHY they can do with Africa whatever they want... India is in peace because they have nukes..
at least if we don't produce nuclear bombs, we can use nuclear energy for civilian purposes such as generating 24/7 electricity.
I don't think that would ever happen. Black people in general globally just don't know how to run a country.
@@OnlyIMatterBlack people don’t care what you think
Every country has the right to defend it self , Africa will soon get nuclear weapons
Amd then get invaded
Africa is a peaceful Continent, our leaders just want generational wealth fir their families dey are not all about conquering other nations, if our leaders can manage their greed, I'm sure Africa will be better yhan Europe
No I don't think so for now
Stiupeed question? What makes you think we should have it.
The soviet union built Ajaokuta steel company which is said to possess nuclear reactor potential. It could generate nuclear powered electricity. Could it be why the Obasanjo administration was coarsed to handover the company to an american establishment? Could it be why this steel company may never function?
At the end of your video, do u mean Americans don't have Nuke??
What did I say to imply that?
Why didn't Nasser get nukes when he was Egypt's president?
Britian, France and Israel invaded Egypt for nationalising its suez canal. Imagine the response if they developed nukes. Besides Egypt had good relations with the soviet union. It was partial the soviet threat to nuke London and Paris that led to the British and French leaving. So why have nukes when you have an ally that would use them on your behalf? It's free protection. South Africa felt it needed nukes because it wasn't friends with either the west or the east. It was isolated, so it felt no country would offer it such protection or retaliate on its behalf
Remember, Mandela was a marxist and we could not leave nuclear capabilities to a possible unstable communist regime. As for capabilities, South Africa still has all the knowledge and some tech, but this will never be made known or handed to the present government as they have proved themselves to be destroyers, not builders.
❤
💯
North Korea's nukes are not the biggest deterrent: the North Koreans don't have a delivery system. Instead the deterrent is the rocket and artillery arsenal that could destroy Seoul.
Japan and south Korea are in their range. They also got two nuclear superpower friends as neighbors. That's the reason north korea is able create its nuke weapons without much interference unlike Iran.
We just don't have the capability to build one ever since S.Africa under Britain ceased the operation. In fact the programme is costly and there is no need of it per now.
Just because SA isn't strong enough to build it, doesn't mean Nigeria isn't. South Africa is weak, you don't speak for the rest of Africa.
@DumaM-ir7rk what, I am saying is, South Africa cares about what's allowed and what's not allowed. That's why SA isn't strong enough to built it. Nigeria doesn't care permissions. They will built it no matter what. Even if it means sanctions or war. That's what it takes. That's why SA isn't strong enough to built it. But Nigeria will.
Thats stupid asf, nigerian cant and shouldnt...ok if nigeria builds nukes what would we use it to do???
No country has nuked another country excpet for PEARL HARBOUR because it makes no sense to do so cause it backfires and only people like me who work in nuclear industry will understand.
The money they couldve have used to build nuclear weapons to kill your family members in the west(USA, UK, CANADA) could be used to build nuclear power plant to power your fridge and PS5 and everyone is belle full and happy FULL STOP.
African countries have more pressing socioeconomic needs than acquisition of nuclear arsenals. It's also capital intensive to develop, secure and maintain nuclear weapons. No country in Africa is currently facing an existential threat to justify the nuclear deterrent option. This may change in the future.
Even though I am a fan of your videos and usually your train of thought, I believe that there are more reasons for no African countries at present having no nukes. First, African countries tend to be far more unstable as to their governments. Say what you want to say about the US, Russia, China, India, France, UK, India and Israel, but they don't tend to have coups every couple of years. Not even north Korea. Pakistan does have them and they are the wildcard as to the stability of their regime, and, given that they tend to be on the more islamist side, so therefore are a threat if Islamic terrorists get their hands on it. And before anyone says the US bombed Japan in World War 2, yes, they did, they ended the war without the need for an armed invasion, protected Japan from the incoming Soviet invasion that would have made a German style scenario in Japan and haven't used them in anger since August 1945.
Do you think a person like Chad's Habre, or the Central African Emperor Boukase wouldn't have used them?
Furthermore, nukes are extremely expensive to build, maintain, secure and launch. Every 5 years, the tritium must be refurbished, at between $100k to $1 million dollars. And that doesn't even include your required industrial base, large amounts of scientists and researchers. If a more developed country like Iran can't master them in 20 years, more scientifically backwards African countries can't reach that goal, while battling hunger and building basic utility and educational infrastructure.
So, my conclusion is that, Africa, at present, doesn't need, can't finance them, or have the technical capabilities. In the future, if Africa continues developing and it's economy grows and politics stabilizes, I can see them having the bomb responsibly, but not at present and under current conditions... Too much must be solved first
😂 may be Russia no my bro when it comes to nukes Russia has the most.
South africa had nuclear weapons
I completely disagree with you about having a sense. I don't believe it costs that much. How much did slavery cost
Each nuke costs many millions of dollars to construct and a few million dollars a year to maintain. The only countries that could realistically have them are south African countries because you need to keep them away from extremist groups.
That money can be better spent improving the lives of the people.
@@graver0bber not just few millions, it cost hundreds of millions to maintain in a year , so it is logical to stop the whole nuclear program and spending so much money on something you don't know when you will use , besides an accident can happen which can contaminate the whole country and part of neighboring countries with radiation, we haven't even talked about security we all know how poor security in africa is , and a nuclear bomb is like a gold chest for terrorist sect imagine a terrorist sect having possession of a nuke.
I@@graver0bber if north Korea and Israel have them,why can't Africa they have more resources than north Korea and Israel combined, it's the European oppressor that is the blockage 😢
Why do u want to ramain servants and slaves
CHEI IMAGINE JAGABAN WITH NUKES OR NIGERIAN ARMY THAT CANT CONTROL DRONES ,THEN HAVING NUKES .I BET U THERE WILL ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE OF NUKES 🤣🤣🤣
You look different now.
Is it a good different? 😅
@@realjudebelayes a good different
Him don dey chop the new money na 😂
We also don't want an arms raise in Africa!