It is pretty OP, could have tons of little tweaks to bring it down a bit. Only triggers on your own turn, lands conjured are tapped, etc. but God forbid they tweak their precious alchemy cards
@@NStriplesevenIt's SUPPOSED to be that but let's face it WOTC and whoever is developing MTGA don't give a damn. They just want to make money and ruin the game with cards that don't exist
Iridescent Hornbeetle (At the beginning of your end step, create a 1/1 green Insect creature token for each +1/+1 counter you've put on creatures under your control this turn) would be pretty good here! 🤗
Wizards need to start to consider adding some combo editor into full control mode. For example: add a repeat the target for the input amount of times to male some of the combos easier and keep adding more features into that "combo editor" and polishing it. Main difference between arena and table top right now is that on table top people are looking forward for looping combo decks, because you can just say - "i repeat it 200 times and you're ded", where on arena you have to repeat the loop 200 times which is potentially over 1k clicks. This makes these decks almost impossible to play or opposite of fun
I'm pretty sure the first sliver deck was a monstrous vortex combo deck. Like most 1 trick decks super boring to sit through and terribly fragile to enchantment removal.
Anybody knows how does the interaction at 13:45 work? Why didn't the Tarmogoyf see the enchantment in the graveyard (much like when it sees the bolt that just resolved)? One could argue that when the ability resolves, states are updated and both damage and the saga sacrifice are applied. Instead, the Tarmo just dies and I don't understand why
A saga's sacrifice clause is also applied after state based effects are checked. After the 3rd chapter finished resolving, the game sees a 3/4 goyf with 4 damage on it, and a saga with 3 counters on it but no chapter ability on the stack. Both things happen simultaneously, so the goyf and the saga goes to the graveyard at the same time. It is for this same reason that, if I have a 1/2 goyf with only lands in the graveyard block an opposing 2/1 creature, both creatures will die, instead of the goyd living as a 2/3 with 2 damage on it. (Notably different from how death's shadow interacts with trample)
Not watching on a MtG video where the title doesn't specify the deck, the strategy, the format or anything. Big NOPE Edit: changed clicking for watching.
All my brawl decks have the Legend's name in the thumbnail. I mention the format at the beginning of the video and it's also listed at the top of the description. There are playlists on my channel page for each format. If you follow me on Patreon or Aetherhub you will also see the format listed next to the title. The strategy of this deck is pretty clearly explained in the title.
Find it hilarious how Legend always makes sure to let us know how much he hates Mythweaver 😂
It is pretty OP, could have tons of little tweaks to bring it down a bit. Only triggers on your own turn, lands conjured are tapped, etc. but God forbid they tweak their precious alchemy cards
@@Devtronzorwait isn’t the whole point of alchemy cards that they can screw with them at a moment’ notice
He has so few card grudges, it's honestly a little refreshing
the amount of alchemy cards you see in brawl is just annoying, wish you could play without alchemy....
@@NStriplesevenIt's SUPPOSED to be that but let's face it WOTC and whoever is developing MTGA don't give a damn. They just want to make money and ruin the game with cards that don't exist
i hope theres a lot of +1/+1 counters
It sure would be disappointing if there was just a medium ammount of +1/+1-counters.
I'm not sure why you think there would ever be any +1 counters in this video.
Well lucky you! This video indeed features a few +1/+1 counters
35:40 there i might have Seen a Counter or two
"Your Go"... immediately explodes. Lmao
LVD making a lot of plus one plus one counters provides plus one value
As always Brawl content is best content
Thank you, i asked for a brawl +1+1 counter video!
You responded and delivered. Top tier creator
That Bolas game was insane. You slowly, inevitably smothered the Grixis player in value.
one and a half hours of Brawl gameplay? it must be christmas or something
Scurry Oak combo kill is crazy!!!!
Iridescent Hornbeetle (At the beginning of your end step, create a 1/1 green Insect creature token for each +1/+1 counter you've put on creatures under your control this turn) would be pretty good here! 🤗
Certainly an option!
Wizards need to start to consider adding some combo editor into full control mode. For example: add a repeat the target for the input amount of times to male some of the combos easier and keep adding more features into that "combo editor" and polishing it.
Main difference between arena and table top right now is that on table top people are looking forward for looping combo decks, because you can just say - "i repeat it 200 times and you're ded", where on arena you have to repeat the loop 200 times which is potentially over 1k clicks. This makes these decks almost impossible to play or opposite of fun
I'm pretty sure the first sliver deck was a monstrous vortex combo deck. Like most 1 trick decks super boring to sit through and terribly fragile to enchantment removal.
A humble offering for the almighty algorithm.
FYI if you say algorithm the UA-cam algorithm ignores the comment
@ Thanks for the heads up. Are you willing to share your source so I may learn more about helping creators by optimizing my engagement?
Anybody knows how does the interaction at 13:45 work? Why didn't the Tarmogoyf see the enchantment in the graveyard (much like when it sees the bolt that just resolved)? One could argue that when the ability resolves, states are updated and both damage and the saga sacrifice are applied. Instead, the Tarmo just dies and I don't understand why
A saga's sacrifice clause is also applied after state based effects are checked. After the 3rd chapter finished resolving, the game sees a 3/4 goyf with 4 damage on it, and a saga with 3 counters on it but no chapter ability on the stack. Both things happen simultaneously, so the goyf and the saga goes to the graveyard at the same time. It is for this same reason that, if I have a 1/2 goyf with only lands in the graveyard block an opposing 2/1 creature, both creatures will die, instead of the goyd living as a 2/3 with 2 damage on it. (Notably different from how death's shadow interacts with trample)
I literally made a very similar brawl deck for midweek recently. It was so fun
I'd love some +1/+1 counters today. Wonder if this video has some...
No Vorinclex is very surprising.
Now that I think about it; lack of Doubling Season shocked me more.
Branching Evolution is the cheaper version in this deck. We’re not making a lot of tokens outside of the plants.
Petition to bring back written words (in addition to symbols) for the categories of the deck: Ramp, Creatures, etc.
30:55 the Mythweaver Poq hate train continues 😂 all aboard
*enters in the room*
REV UP THOSE COUNTERS!
*proud Chandra noises*
Nissa Lets gooooo!
12:02 I think you could have kept rishkar untapped as a blocker in exchange for tapping one more forest
Waiting for 5 brawl decks, one for each baby PW from the Origin set!
Incubation druid was so much fun
Is there a paper playable commander you recommend as a substitute as planeswalkers arent allowed?
There are a lot of contenders in this deck, they will all need slightly different builds.
Can you makecSquee the immoral commander deck the one that can be cast from exile or graveyard one
Here for the +1/+1 counters
Clicked to see a lot of +1/+1 counters on this one
why are non-brawl deck videos so much shorter?
Brawl has more variety than other formats. It’s also more fun to play for me.
No Kaldheim Vorinclex?
Seems like an auto include in this type of deck.
Trying to keep the curve low but it’s certainly an option.
HARDENED SCALES
algo love
Here at 0 views and I'm ready to see LVD Plant all over these peeps.
I hate Alchemy's cards.
f i r s t
Please words instead of symbols
MAKE A BRISTLY BILL DECK PLEASE
I did in this video:
ua-cam.com/video/CtzIIIvU2NA/v-deo.html
@@LegenVD oh i mean like a real one
Not watching on a MtG video where the title doesn't specify the deck, the strategy, the format or anything. Big NOPE
Edit: changed clicking for watching.
If you didn't click on it how did you end up in the comments?
@@R-wzd good point! meant not watching lol
All my brawl decks have the Legend's name in the thumbnail. I mention the format at the beginning of the video and it's also listed at the top of the description. There are playlists on my channel page for each format. If you follow me on Patreon or Aetherhub you will also see the format listed next to the title. The strategy of this deck is pretty clearly explained in the title.
I prefer his clever titles and thumbnails over generic deck + format titles