Die Rekt what are you on about? The nature is beautiful.. its humanity that makes this world dangerous and scary.. nature has and always will be beautiful, it’s the only beautiful part of this world.
@@deadphilix1671 you misunderstood them i think.... They mean if we leave nature then we will feel less....whereas if we are in nature..the more we feel
@@GreatOldOne999 Sorry dude but nobody and no one ever attempted to debunk a massive amount of evidence behind mind's affect on matter. If you actually have your arguments against it then present them.
@@GreatOldOne999 there is an absurd amount of scientific evidence for psi phenomenon. Even some materialists who ACTUALLY look at the research are accepting it- and what's ironic is that the ones who say "it's quantum!!" while they shake their hands is those materialists who try to fit psi phenomenon into their materialist philosophy by using absurd mental gimnastics. If I ask you how "it's been debunked", I can bet my ass off that you will say some cheerypicked things about uri geller, or something along those lines. Psi phenomenon is beyond proven (scientifically) and it has better numbers that some FDA approved meds you see at your local drugstore
I have had hundreds or even over one thousand of experiences that convinced me that there is a connection between my mind and my outside world. Because those experiences later began to frighten me, I repeatedly sought help of psychiatrists and shamans. Many of the doctors said that I don´t have hallucinations and that they couldn´t explain my experiences themself. One could could call my experiences synchronicity phenomena (my first psychotherapist mentioned this word when I told him about my early experiences - which I experienced not as threatening but rather as a gift and as a godsend. He introduced me to the concept of synchronicity, which I haven´t heard of before. Things became problematic when I started to have three to ten such phenomena a day and to consider them to be signs, warnings of dangerous energies which surrounded me. I will give you an example. An phenomena I´ve experienced this year. It was at a time when I had only very few of such experiences: I was reading the novel "One Flew over the Cuckoo´s nest". Suddenly, I thought, if I read the word "world" in the text, that would have a meaning. I´ve forgotten which meaning that was. I assume it was a meaning such as that something in my flat is contaminated by a dangerous energy or something. I usually thought such phenomena should be signs of that kind. - On the next few pages the word "world" appeared three times. And I simply can´t believe that something like that can be explained by probability. And it definitely wasn´t the case that I have scrolled through the book before, so that my subconscious may have registered the word "world", which is why I have agreed it as a sign. I haven´t scrolled through the book and I can´t imagine that the human subconscious would be able to do such things. But this event hardly frightened me, compared to similar experiences I had in the past. For the past few months I hardly had any such experience any more. My explanation is that these events happened because I wanted them to happen. My will focused very intensly and manifestated itself in the outside world. Now, I almost never want that such things happen- so they don´t. But of course it could also be possible that there was an outside force or power or entitiy which was receiving my thoughts and desires and which has shaped the outside world accordingly. I am sure for many people all that sounds crazy. For me it doesn´t. For me it is crazy to imagine that all connections between the mental and the material world are just coincidences.
@@t.m.8339 Thank you for the reassurence. By the way, for some years I experience much less synchronicities. I have the feeling that is because I hardly want to experience something again.
@@howardpope3932 I guess you're right, there are - as you know - theories according to which we csn influence and / or create them. I still have them now and then and enjoy them :-) take care!
Those who have even preliminary acquaintance with the structure and laws of the inner spheres of existence know that the isolation of human beings is a fiction. Whether they desire it or not, all persons constantly act and interact upon each other by their very existence, even when they have not established contact on the physical plane. There are no limits to the influence of man. The magnetic influence of the subtle spheres knows no barriers of frontiers or distance or any other conventional limitation. Good thoughts as well as evil, cheerful moods as well as gloomy, noble and expansive feelings as well as petty and narrow ones, unselfish aspiration as well as selfish ambition, all influence others, even when not expressed in words or deeds. Thus, the world of mental life is as much a unified system as the world of matter. The physical world as a vehicle of spiritual life has its own importance; but the connections existing between different persons is by no means fully realised by considering only the contacts of the physical world. Meher Baba
Excellent comment and way of putting thing as a possible theory. I don't understand why any of this is taboo to many. If much of everything is indeed empty space and we transmit and give off measurable signals. it is highly likely that we can effect the outcomes of our surroundings. Also scientifically proven ala double slit as mentioned. This was researched by some of the brightest minds already, the likes of Bohr and Einstein they also came to a rather stunning conclusion that we even have an effect on the universe.
The double slit experiment doesn't require you to observe the event in order to collapse the wave-function. It is enough that something without consciousness (let's say a computer) records it, and the wave-function of whatever you send through the slit will collapse. Theories are alright by themselves, but you have to admit it's destructive when they twist and distort facts.
Markus, Until someone reads the results, they are still unknown. NO COMPUTER THE ABILITY TO "KNOW" ANYTHING. It just provides data, no deeper meaning beyond this.
It's just people pretending to be scientists when they are not. They talk about quantum physics and double slit experiments while being clearly ignorant or fraudolent. Double slit experiment doesn't show any effect of consciousness over matter, and PK was debunked long ago as just magician tricks. These people just clutches onto RNG because it is easier to debunk.
Has anyone with extreme empathy every found their energy either being fueled or drained based on the collective support or lack there of the surrounding peers?
Some of the «intention» experiments described in this video remind me of some of Dr. Steven Greer's descriptions/explanations of thought-controlled technologies (but that such types of technologies are apparently very highly censored and suppressed from clandestine forces of collusion/conspiracy/monopoly). I think there are additional terms besides thought-controlled prosthetics/computing but there have already been basic versions of such technologies (referencing Dr. Greer's explanations for «alien-level» technology) demonstrated back in the early 2000s with thought-controlled mouse cursors (something to do with electrodes connected to the brain for the mind to move the cursor on a screen). Whilst putting in this comment, I now «see» why the materialism-oriented «pharmaceutical» industry always seems to want to prevent this kind of information from getting out into or believed by the public, and I will just state that it is factual that «thoughts» _can_ and *do* have an influence over one's emotions; why would anybody buy «anti-depressants» (psychotropics are neuro-toxic poisons) when one can instead use their own thoughts to control and regulate their own emotions (although psychotronic mind-control technologies are another issue that I won't go into too much detail over at the moment). The «mind» also has the capability to literally solve every single problem in existence, the end of all diseases (Dr. Royal Raymond Rife), the elimination of poverty (Nikola Tesla), the many cures for cancer (investigated and discussed by Sergeant Rick Schiff of the San Francisco Police Department), abolishment of tyrannical/oppressive de facto corporate governments (pending global movement), etc. The mind is certainly a powerful tool if developed properly to fully use. ;o
Hello ! Kindly could you share with me some studies that prove the attraction law and mind over matter by a scientific proof such as quantum physics of others? And if have books you recommend to read ill be glade to you Thanks a lot .
@@aeiuscercle5010 many thanks for your reply and for sure i’ll make sure that your words will be under revised and to be assured , sharing experiments with me is really help because am also not believe too much in attraction law , appreciated your help .
I manifested £0.16p today. I was holding a 2p piece (the one I always use) and doing my affirmations (this time regarding money). To my right I found a 5p, to my left I found 2x5p's and then in front of me I found a 1p. All where I was sitting. They were probably there all along, but I'll stay optimistic :-)
Just flipped a coin 10 times, thinking heads. 8/10 heads. Same again, thinking tails. Again 8/10. Also, the times it wasn’t what I was thinking, I didn’t catch the coin. Your go!
The Vedas have been saying this for 15000 years + Still much more science that has yet to be brought forth from them. It is unfortunate that Italy is still withholding this information, albeit the world is about to change.
don't feel bad, in America I never heard of the Vedas until I was 50 yrs old. now I love reading them. They only want you to eat hot dogs ,Cheetos, drink, watch sports and go to work here.
This is a step closer to proving Roger Penrose right. He actually states that consciousness comes from the quantum level of the universe. So you could say that the part that makes us uniques is also a part of the universe but in the background
Human consciousness is controlling the groth (evolution) of A.I. , that's how A.I. was intended to be. It was programmed to listen and learn with each interaction.
There is no such thing as a "truly random" generator. What we perceive as random is simply an unknown cause or a cause too small to measure or a series of causes too complex to be traced back to its origin. This is not just personal opinion. It is based on 5000 year-old Hermetic wisdom, which states that Chance is but a name for Law not recognized. When you think about it, you realize that mind could not affect a RNG if the numbers were indeed random. Otherwise the numbers would simply ignore the attempted influence. That mind can affect the outcome clearly demonstrates that the numbers _can_ be influenced. If they can be influenced by mind, then they are _always_ influenced by Universal Mind. If they weren't, then they would be independent of Universal Mind. If that were true, then Consciousness would not be One, it would be Two; and order could never arise from chaos.
what if 2 people have concentrate on a specific opposite result, their will collide and then what? an experiment should have made and if so, mentioned. in the real world there are endless conflicting thoughts and needs between humans. A wants money, B wants A money, and so on.
The psychologists Leonard Zusne, Warren H. Jones supported Hansel and also noted: The effect obtained by Schmidt and others is very small, at most a 2% deviation from the 50% chance level. Because of the very large number of trials that can be run with the REG in a short period of time (each trial lasts only a second or less), the odds against even such minuscule deviations range from 100 to 1 to several billions to 1. When, in addition to assessing the statistical significance of the results, their clinical or practical significance is also assessed using the appropriate statistics, it turns out to be practically zero... It can be assumed that the smaller the absolute size of a measured effect, the greater the likelihood that the effect is due to some extraneous, uncontrolled variable. In the REG experiments, statistical significance of the results is achieved only against a background of a very large number of trials, and the practical significance of the results is concomitantly zero. It can be, therefore, also assumed that such results are probably the outcome of one or more uncontrolled variable
I doubt the wave-function is being collapsed -- or even if there is ever a collapse? However, it looks to me like something else is being affected -- something in nature and reality. Reality is responding to thought in some way. That is, the "information" formed in the mind. A simple way of looking at it is "inducing synchronicities to happen". What would be more interesting would be knowing exactly how or why this happens. Although, there are several theories out there none of them really satisfy me. However, the best one is that reality is actually one big information system, and that the human mind can get information from it and put information into it. I'm going to go with that for the time being.
I really don't know how this video ended up suddenly becoming multiple several years old when I only remember it being first uploaded/released like a couple of years ago (perhaps a Mandela-Effect, but, not by Wiki's obviously fake/convoluted/far-fetched definition), but, you may be interested to know about the Steven Hawkings bet about black-holes, and, that he later on admitted to losing the bet, eventually describing the Black-Holes as not being masses of extreme-gravity that suck everything into itself, but, rather, information-leaks, that essentially release information into «the universe» (perhaps a sources of from/where all of the «structures/designs» manifest into their various physical-forms, like how trees take shape, rather than everything just being scattered about randomly).
@@aeiuscercle5010 ... Interesting. ... For me it's just easier to think of the Universe as a big information system that one can psychically get information from it (clairvoyance), and put information into it (like inducing synchronicities to happen or manifestation effects, and perhaps even healing effects are related to the phenomena). Certainly physical formations would be part of the system also.
@@aeiuscercle5010 (2) ... The Mandela Effect is part of "Reality Shift" phenomena. Alternations in physical reality are rare (if they happen) and different people may experience slightly different realities. The exception to this seems to be when two or more people experience the shift at the same time and place. Here, everyone there will have a memory of the same experience while the rest of the world has a different memory of things. In an information system, one would expect the occasional glitch or over an overwriting, of parts of the past.
[Sorry for my english im still learning.] Matter is not that we can understand in very good preception ... We call it matter cause it looks like matter for us, we can say ok so my hand is not able to move trought the wall so wall is matter and my hand too... When you will be able to somehow control vibrations of your body and get it on higher level then that we call matter it would just pass over it like nothing and then lower your vibrations your body will be fine. I mean if you take it as it, we are talking only about energy and what frequency it have. If mind is that what is able to control energy then we can say mind can go over matter or better say over lower vibrations of energy.
In psychology research, an effect with 20 to 1 odds of it happening by chance is considered 'statistically significant'. An effect with 10000 to 1 odds of it happening by chance is seen as a FACT in science. Most of our technology is based on those odds. So an effect with 1,000,000,000,000 to 1 odds of it happening by chance is simply an undeniable fact. EDIT: I will add that this only tells us that one thing is certain: these results are not just happening by chance. What it doesn't tell us however, is what causes these results. Only if paranormal explanations for these effects are the only possible explanation left can we say that the evidence for paranormal events is conclusive enough. However, since these researchers have gone to incredibly great lengths in order to rule out all other "normal" explanations, I'd say the evidence is indeed conclusive enough. It's not just one experiment either: there's a whole host of different types of experiments performed by different people in different parts of the world showing great evidence for the existence of paranormal events. If you're curious, check out things like PEAR labs or Dean Radin's talks, or better yet, work on gaining your own direct, personal experience and evidence. EDIT: Furthermore, in my opinion the statement "incredible claims require incredible proof" is not really valid anymore in the case of these paranormal events. Paranormal events are only "incredible claims that require incredible proof" from the perspective of a materialistic model of reality. But materialism has failed as a good model of reality. We have much better models of reality now, in which all these "incredible" paranormal events, are just "normal" and to be expected.
No, not at all. It's a fun thought, but that's as far as it goes. Here is a quote from SkepDic about one of the psychic-studies: "According to John McCrone, "Operator 10," believed to be a PEAR staff member, "has been involved in 15% of the 14 million trials, yet contributed to a full half of the total excess hits" (McCrone 1994)." Sounds fishy....
Dan Brown's Lost Symbol was so heavily influenced by this. I was awed when I read the book...
Why does this video have not more views? I love how you show your sources straight in the video and especially your editing. Keep up the good work!
The further man gets from Nature, the less we are able to feel.
Die Rekt what are you on about? The nature is beautiful.. its humanity that makes this world dangerous and scary.. nature has and always will be beautiful, it’s the only beautiful part of this world.
@@deadphilix1671 you misunderstood them i think.... They mean if we leave nature then we will feel less....whereas if we are in nature..the more we feel
Yeet
Consciousness affecting matter: No amount of experimentation will cause people to stop calling it mysticism if they so like.
Consciousness affecting matter is fake, it has been debunked many many times. People still believe in magical woo using quantum physics as an excuse.
Raffaello Fratini provide your sources please..
@@GreatOldOne999 Sorry dude but nobody and no one ever attempted to debunk a massive amount of evidence behind mind's affect on matter. If you actually have your arguments against it then present them.
@@GreatOldOne999 there is an absurd amount of scientific evidence for psi phenomenon. Even some materialists who ACTUALLY look at the research are accepting it- and what's ironic is that the ones who say "it's quantum!!" while they shake their hands is those materialists who try to fit psi phenomenon into their materialist philosophy by using absurd mental gimnastics.
If I ask you how "it's been debunked", I can bet my ass off that you will say some cheerypicked things about uri geller, or something along those lines.
Psi phenomenon is beyond proven (scientifically) and it has better numbers that some FDA approved meds you see at your local drugstore
Hundreds of years into the future, this will be “common sense”.
And I do not know why I feel that I am so important for the future.
I have had hundreds or even over one thousand of experiences that convinced me that there is a connection between my mind and my outside world. Because those experiences later began to frighten me, I repeatedly sought help of psychiatrists and shamans. Many of the doctors said that I don´t have hallucinations and that they couldn´t explain my experiences themself.
One could could call my experiences synchronicity phenomena (my first psychotherapist mentioned this word when I told him about my early experiences - which I experienced not as threatening but rather as a gift and as a godsend. He introduced me to the concept of synchronicity, which I haven´t heard of before.
Things became problematic when I started to have three to ten such phenomena a day and to consider them to be signs, warnings of dangerous energies which surrounded me.
I will give you an example. An phenomena I´ve experienced this year. It was at a time when I had only very few of such experiences: I was reading the novel "One Flew over the Cuckoo´s nest". Suddenly, I thought, if I read the word "world" in the text, that would have a meaning. I´ve forgotten which meaning that was. I assume it was a meaning such as that something in my flat is contaminated by a dangerous energy or something. I usually thought such phenomena should be signs of that kind. - On the next few pages the word "world" appeared three times.
And I simply can´t believe that something like that can be explained by probability. And it definitely wasn´t the case that I have scrolled through the book before, so that my subconscious may have registered the word "world", which is why I have agreed it as a sign. I haven´t scrolled through the book and I can´t imagine that the human subconscious would be able to do such things.
But this event hardly frightened me, compared to similar experiences I had in the past.
For the past few months I hardly had any such experience any more. My explanation is that these events happened because I wanted them to happen. My will focused very intensly and manifestated itself in the outside world. Now, I almost never want that such things happen- so they don´t.
But of course it could also be possible that there was an outside force or power or entitiy which was receiving my thoughts and desires and which has shaped the outside world accordingly.
I am sure for many people all that sounds crazy. For me it doesn´t. For me it is crazy to imagine that all connections between the mental and the material world are just coincidences.
Be happy if synchronicity appears, it is the way the universe works, why be afraid? Most people don't see it.
@@t.m.8339 Thank you for the reassurence. By the way, for some years I experience much less synchronicities. I have the feeling that is because I hardly want to experience something again.
@@howardpope3932 I guess you're right, there are - as you know - theories according to which we csn influence and / or create them. I still have them now and then and enjoy them :-) take care!
@@t.m.8339 Thank you! You too!
It seems to me that those theories are true.
Those who have even preliminary acquaintance with the structure and laws of the inner spheres of existence know that the isolation of human beings is a fiction. Whether they desire it or not, all persons constantly act and interact upon each other by their very existence, even when they have not established contact on the physical plane. There are no limits to the influence of man. The magnetic influence of the subtle spheres knows no barriers of frontiers or distance or any other conventional limitation. Good thoughts as well as evil, cheerful moods as well as gloomy, noble and expansive feelings as well as petty and narrow ones, unselfish aspiration as well as selfish ambition, all influence others, even when not expressed in words or deeds. Thus, the world of mental life is as much a unified system as the world of matter. The physical world as a vehicle of spiritual life has its own importance; but the connections existing between different persons is by no means fully realised by considering only the contacts of the physical world.
Meher Baba
Excellent comment and way of putting thing as a possible theory. I don't understand why any of this is taboo to many. If much of everything is indeed empty space and we transmit and give off measurable signals. it is highly likely that we can effect the outcomes of our surroundings. Also scientifically proven ala double slit as mentioned. This was researched by some of the brightest minds already, the likes of Bohr and Einstein they also came to a rather stunning conclusion that we even have an effect on the universe.
The double slit experiment doesn't require you to observe the event in order to collapse the wave-function. It is enough that something without consciousness (let's say a computer) records it, and the wave-function of whatever you send through the slit will collapse.
Theories are alright by themselves, but you have to admit it's destructive when they twist and distort facts.
Markus, Until someone reads the results, they are still unknown.
NO COMPUTER THE ABILITY TO "KNOW" ANYTHING. It just provides data, no deeper meaning beyond this.
I think mind over matter works but some of these comments sound like people who are trying to hard to sound smart.
If physics can't explain this, physics is incomplete or broken.
It's just people pretending to be scientists when they are not. They talk about quantum physics and double slit experiments while being clearly ignorant or fraudolent. Double slit experiment doesn't show any effect of consciousness over matter, and PK was debunked long ago as just magician tricks. These people just clutches onto RNG because it is easier to debunk.
They fail to see that consciousness created and is everything. The double slit experiment isn't even part of it.
@@GreatOldOne999 cite your sources buddy!
Can you experience physics outside of awareness?
Has anyone with extreme empathy every found their energy either being fueled or drained based on the collective support or lack there of the surrounding peers?
The new world my friend. Welcome
Some of the «intention» experiments described in this video remind me of some of Dr. Steven Greer's descriptions/explanations of thought-controlled technologies (but that such types of technologies are apparently very highly censored and suppressed from clandestine forces of collusion/conspiracy/monopoly). I think there are additional terms besides thought-controlled prosthetics/computing but there have already been basic versions of such technologies (referencing Dr. Greer's explanations for «alien-level» technology) demonstrated back in the early 2000s with thought-controlled mouse cursors (something to do with electrodes connected to the brain for the mind to move the cursor on a screen).
Whilst putting in this comment, I now «see» why the materialism-oriented «pharmaceutical» industry always seems to want to prevent this kind of information from getting out into or believed by the public, and I will just state that it is factual that «thoughts» _can_ and *do* have an influence over one's emotions; why would anybody buy «anti-depressants» (psychotropics are neuro-toxic poisons) when one can instead use their own thoughts to control and regulate their own emotions (although psychotronic mind-control technologies are another issue that I won't go into too much detail over at the moment).
The «mind» also has the capability to literally solve every single problem in existence, the end of all diseases (Dr. Royal Raymond Rife), the elimination of poverty (Nikola Tesla), the many cures for cancer (investigated and discussed by Sergeant Rick Schiff of the San Francisco Police Department), abolishment of tyrannical/oppressive de facto corporate governments (pending global movement), etc. The mind is certainly a powerful tool if developed properly to fully use. ;o
Hello !
Kindly could you share with me some studies that prove the attraction law and mind over matter by a scientific proof such as quantum physics of others?
And if have books you recommend to read ill be glade to you
Thanks a lot .
@@aeiuscercle5010 many thanks for your reply and for sure i’ll make sure that your words will be under revised and to be assured , sharing experiments with me is really help because am also not believe too much in attraction law , appreciated your help .
Mind and matter are two halves of the same coin.
I manifested £0.16p today.
I was holding a 2p piece (the one I always use) and doing my affirmations (this time regarding money).
To my right I found a 5p, to my left I found 2x5p's and then in front of me I found a 1p.
All where I was sitting.
They were probably there all along, but I'll stay optimistic :-)
Just flipped a coin 10 times, thinking heads. 8/10 heads. Same again, thinking tails. Again 8/10. Also, the times it wasn’t what I was thinking, I didn’t catch the coin. Your go!
You lost me at 3:03. What are they measuring? How are they measuring it?
I've always seen and heard of Dean Radin doing experiments like this.. I'm surprised you didn't mention him
The Vedas have been saying this for 15000 years +
Still much more science that has yet to be brought forth from them.
It is unfortunate that Italy is still withholding this information, albeit the world is about to change.
Andrew Stang-Green what is this about Italy withholding information. please tell me about it
don't feel bad, in America I never heard of the Vedas until I was 50 yrs old.
now I love reading them. They only want you to eat hot dogs ,Cheetos, drink, watch sports and go to work here.
Vedas are just books to oppress dalits and women stop sniffing glue then read them carefully
When humanity stops eating animals that will be the transformational time when the human mind becomes calm and able to manifest miracles
All is possible! But not to everyone!
For those who are criminally insane psychopaths and are possessed by Satan will never experience the "good-light"
This is a step closer to proving Roger Penrose right. He actually states that consciousness comes from the quantum level of the universe. So you could say that the part that makes us uniques is also a part of the universe but in the background
1:15
Hit or miss, Huh?
Human consciousness is controlling the groth (evolution) of A.I. , that's how A.I. was intended to be. It was programmed to listen and learn with each interaction.
And when the 911 event happens it triggers a collective awareness.
The evidence here was small but great topic and video!
I don't mean to sound condescending here but the idea that the mind exists in reality itself isn't at all a massive revelation.
Perhaps this mind over matter thing and what we traditionally view as magic are one and the same.
Sounds familiar to the guy from metaRising
Intellect Mind Over Matter is the philosophical book on this topic.
There is no such thing as a "truly random" generator. What we perceive as random is simply an unknown cause or a cause too small to measure or a series of causes too complex to be traced back to its origin. This is not just personal opinion. It is based on 5000 year-old Hermetic wisdom, which states that Chance is but a name for Law not recognized.
When you think about it, you realize that mind could not affect a RNG if the numbers were indeed random. Otherwise the numbers would simply ignore the attempted influence. That mind can affect the outcome clearly demonstrates that the numbers _can_ be influenced. If they can be influenced by mind, then they are _always_ influenced by Universal Mind. If they weren't, then they would be independent of Universal Mind. If that were true, then Consciousness would not be One, it would be Two; and order could never arise from chaos.
Yes there is it's called RNG in games and can be applied to real life as well. Anything can be random including this comment.
The mind over matter can never be explained using 3D scientific theories because mind over matter mainly exist in 4D world. .
What?
what if 2 people have concentrate on a specific opposite result, their will collide and then what? an experiment should have made and if so, mentioned.
in the real world there are endless conflicting thoughts and needs between humans. A wants money, B wants A money, and so on.
The psychologists Leonard Zusne, Warren H. Jones supported Hansel and also noted:
The effect obtained by Schmidt and others is very small, at most a 2% deviation from the 50% chance level. Because of the very large number of trials that can be run with the REG in a short period of time (each trial lasts only a second or less), the odds against even such minuscule deviations range from 100 to 1 to several billions to 1. When, in addition to assessing the statistical significance of the results, their clinical or practical significance is also assessed using the appropriate statistics, it turns out to be practically zero... It can be assumed that the smaller the absolute size of a measured effect, the greater the likelihood that the effect is due to some extraneous, uncontrolled variable. In the REG experiments, statistical significance of the results is achieved only against a background of a very large number of trials, and the practical significance of the results is concomitantly zero. It can be, therefore, also assumed that such results are probably the outcome of one or more uncontrolled variable
What about others people affecting other people's life?
The balance of reality:
Satin = the destroyer
God = the creator
Another abrahamitic dwarf mind, who needs some bad guy for things that he does not like.
Satin and his glitter army
Thank you, great video!
Well spoken. No rush rush.
yes very well done video, it deserves more views. What happened to empiricism in this world :*(
I doubt the wave-function is being collapsed -- or even if there is ever a collapse? However, it looks to me like something else is being affected -- something in nature and reality. Reality is responding to thought in some way. That is, the "information" formed in the mind. A simple way of looking at it is "inducing synchronicities to happen". What would be more interesting would be knowing exactly how or why this happens. Although, there are several theories out there none of them really satisfy me. However, the best one is that reality is actually one big information system, and that the human mind can get information from it and put information into it. I'm going to go with that for the time being.
I really don't know how this video ended up suddenly becoming multiple several years old when I only remember it being first uploaded/released like a couple of years ago (perhaps a Mandela-Effect, but, not by Wiki's obviously fake/convoluted/far-fetched definition), but, you may be interested to know about the Steven Hawkings bet about black-holes, and, that he later on admitted to losing the bet, eventually describing the Black-Holes as not being masses of extreme-gravity that suck everything into itself, but, rather, information-leaks, that essentially release information into «the universe» (perhaps a sources of from/where all of the «structures/designs» manifest into their various physical-forms, like how trees take shape, rather than everything just being scattered about randomly).
@@aeiuscercle5010 ... Interesting. ... For me it's just easier to think of the Universe as a big information system that one can psychically get information from it (clairvoyance), and put information into it (like inducing synchronicities to happen or manifestation effects, and perhaps even healing effects are related to the phenomena). Certainly physical formations would be part of the system also.
@@aeiuscercle5010 (2) ... The Mandela Effect is part of "Reality Shift" phenomena. Alternations in physical reality are rare (if they happen) and different people may experience slightly different realities. The exception to this seems to be when two or more people experience the shift at the same time and place. Here, everyone there will have a memory of the same experience while the rest of the world has a different memory of things. In an information system, one would expect the occasional glitch or over an overwriting, of parts of the past.
over matter? don't think so
connected in some way? sure thing
[Sorry for my english im still learning.]
Matter is not that we can understand in very good preception ...
We call it matter cause it looks like matter for us, we can say ok so my hand is not able to move trought the wall so wall is matter and my hand too... When you will be able to somehow control vibrations of your body and get it on higher level then that we call matter it would just pass over it like nothing and then lower your vibrations your body will be fine.
I mean if you take it as it, we are talking only about energy and what frequency it have. If mind is that what is able to control energy then we can say mind can go over matter or better say over lower vibrations of energy.
the reason why the double slit experiments do what they do
So far in my life(22 year) nothing unbelieveable has ever happened everyhing happened was only logical.
is the evidence conclusive enough ?
A trillion to one odds of it being chance is far far more conclusive than most of the normal experiments you hear about from psychology.
In psychology research, an effect with 20 to 1 odds of it happening by chance is considered 'statistically significant'. An effect with 10000 to 1 odds of it happening by chance is seen as a FACT in science. Most of our technology is based on those odds. So an effect with 1,000,000,000,000 to 1 odds of it happening by chance is simply an undeniable fact.
EDIT: I will add that this only tells us that one thing is certain: these results are not just happening by chance. What it doesn't tell us however, is what causes these results. Only if paranormal explanations for these effects are the only possible explanation left can we say that the evidence for paranormal events is conclusive enough. However, since these researchers have gone to incredibly great lengths in order to rule out all other "normal" explanations, I'd say the evidence is indeed conclusive enough. It's not just one experiment either: there's a whole host of different types of experiments performed by different people in different parts of the world showing great evidence for the existence of paranormal events. If you're curious, check out things like PEAR labs or Dean Radin's talks, or better yet, work on gaining your own direct, personal experience and evidence.
EDIT: Furthermore, in my opinion the statement "incredible claims require incredible proof" is not really valid anymore in the case of these paranormal events. Paranormal events are only "incredible claims that require incredible proof" from the perspective of a materialistic model of reality. But materialism has failed as a good model of reality. We have much better models of reality now, in which all these "incredible" paranormal events, are just "normal" and to be expected.
No, not at all. It's a fun thought, but that's as far as it goes. Here is a quote from SkepDic about one of the psychic-studies: "According to John McCrone, "Operator 10," believed to be a PEAR staff member, "has been involved in 15% of the 14 million trials, yet contributed to a full half of the total excess hits" (McCrone 1994)." Sounds fishy....
I think therefore, I am 🤔
Soo... Shmidt is RNGesus. Mind Blown
WIND....TREES... NATURE
No.
I will be happy if science come somehow to the state and able to confirm that hermetics have truth... but it will take some time.
Peter Quad as max planck said: science progresses, one funeral at a time" 😉
Believe me you will know when you break Matter 😉😉
Ordo ab Chao
Just think of the boost we got when Trump got elected,if obamas was that big President Trumps must be massive!!
Well, sure. 9/11 was huge. Disasters get people's attention.
Has anyone else mentioned "crock of horseshit?"
Nope because you are wrong