How did the Mongols Conquer China?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 3 роки тому +711

    This is the perfect example of how the enemy of your enemy isn't always your friend

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 3 роки тому +47

      You just need to know who the bigger enemy is

    • @IamAWESOME3980
      @IamAWESOME3980 3 роки тому +14

      your friends until your enemies fall

    • @jinskyjoyous
      @jinskyjoyous 3 роки тому +30

      before this, China allied with Jin to eliminate Liao. Jin was a friend (enemy of Liao), then became the biggest enemy. Almost identical story.

    • @MrPataca1000
      @MrPataca1000 3 роки тому +2

      所以我们中国人的历史时刻提醒我们不要相信那些北方人

    • @benlam496
      @benlam496 2 роки тому +3

      If it’s age of 3 kingdom, Son Quan would aid the Jin in fighting Mongolians, after defeating the Mongolian army, he would turn his back to fight the Jin with the weaker Mongolian troops. After Jin is done might face the Mongolian head on

  • @ty814
    @ty814 11 місяців тому +41

    It took great khans Genghis Khan, Ugodei Khan, Gayuk Khan , Mongke Khan and the last Kublai Khan (Nominal) various decades to conquer entire China using their military might. It shows how hard was to conquer China.

    • @rainnyday7614
      @rainnyday7614 7 місяців тому +6

      In total, these kings took 60 years to conquer all of China

    • @LaoAr234PastelGalaxy
      @LaoAr234PastelGalaxy 25 днів тому

      中国防御工事非常强大,蒙古的分裂是因为Möngke Khan打中国四川的钓鱼城战死,一个强大的蒙古帝国就这样分裂了
      China's fortifications were very strong. The Mongolian Empire was split because Möngke Khan was killed in the battle of Diaoyucheng in Sichuan, China. The powerful Mongolian Empire was split.

  • @parallel38
    @parallel38 2 роки тому +475

    Given how many decades it took them to take China who was right next to them vs how easy it took them to breeze through to Central Asia-Europe really showed how strong China was.

    • @YJSP893
      @YJSP893 2 роки тому +73

      however Song China had the weakest military...
      It had talented generals, but the emporor limited them so bad
      many times, Song China almost had a chance to take back lands but all oppotunities are lost

    • @bankrob9941
      @bankrob9941 2 роки тому +45

      mongol was the tributary state of jin dynasty. jin basiclly bully mongol for long time until mongol united

    • @bot01020
      @bot01020 2 роки тому +41

      @@bankrob9941 mongol wasn’t a thing before genghis khan, the Jin dynasty has minor tribes under them, but some how one man is able to unit all of it

    • @afdalridwan3813
      @afdalridwan3813 2 роки тому +6

      @@bot01020 the Sima family who rule Jin for 1000 years was just causing Suffers for Xiongnu tribes(Mongol's also)untuk Main character born named Chingghis

    • @Ayush-v2e6n
      @Ayush-v2e6n 2 роки тому +13

      Ehhh, Central asia just didn't have any centralised powers and its one of the least densely populated region of the world

  • @PrabirKrPal
    @PrabirKrPal 3 роки тому +197

    Genghis Khan united the mongol tribes to protect Mongolia from outside threats. But he ended up making the biggest land empire in history.

    • @michaelcooper9422
      @michaelcooper9422 3 роки тому +10

      Second great britian had the biggest

    • @michaelcooper9422
      @michaelcooper9422 3 роки тому +5

      @@StandTallFortress i know in which britian still held the most land at its peak.

    • @michaelcooper9422
      @michaelcooper9422 3 роки тому +3

      @@StandTallFortress take that back im wrong lol.

    • @DrDoomsd
      @DrDoomsd 3 роки тому +18

      @@StandTallFortress British invaded almost every country in the world. They defeated the central powers, Napoleon and the Axis powers. They defeated the Dutch, Spain and Swedes. They also subdued India and china. Apart from all the technological and political innovations they brought. You must be crazy

    • @shafqatishan437
      @shafqatishan437 3 роки тому +11

      @@michaelcooper9422 he said land empire not colonial empire.

  • @rj5848
    @rj5848 3 роки тому +146

    If mongols failed in conquering Xixia then mongols would never have gained confidence to conquer other lands and therefore we wont have the largest continuous empire this huge

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 3 роки тому +32

      He likely still would've expanded into central asia and would've used that to attack the western xia from multiple angles repeatedly until they submitted. That kingdom was not destined to survive due to its poor geography.

    • @Belioyt
      @Belioyt 3 роки тому +3

      I think if the Mongols did establish their empire, another group of people would have

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому +3

      @@Belioyt no

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому +6

      @Patrick Swan but mongols were an outlier. it’s not normal to conquer such a vast territory within 100 years during the middle ages

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому +7

      @Patrick Swan only british, russian empires can compare with the size of the mongol empire. the next largest empire, the qing, doesn’t even come close to half what the mongol empire ruled.

  • @HistoryOfRevolutions
    @HistoryOfRevolutions 3 роки тому +68

    "Pride and excess bring disaster for man"
    - Xunzi

  • @zheng1437
    @zheng1437 3 роки тому +180

    When we said the Mongol had 100 thousand armies, they really do have a hundred thousand armies that can fight. They settle camps anywhere they like and hunt the wild animals when they want to eat. When you said that the Chinese had 400 thousand armies, 80% of them are administrative, food transporters and units that do not fight. They bring and transport their own food to war. So it is only about 100 thousand armies that cannot fight as well as the Mongols.

    • @shiwuli5496
      @shiwuli5496 3 роки тому +2

      不完全是这样吧(๑ت๑)

    • @PrabirKrPal
      @PrabirKrPal 3 роки тому +24

      The Jin empire alone mobilised an army of a million (900,000 infantry and 100,000 cavalry) to fight against the mongols, but they were decimated by the mongols because of there superior mobility and tactics.

    • @sergiovastano5422
      @sergiovastano5422 3 роки тому +10

      Numbers alone don't won wars.When the Mongols fought,they put an entire army ready to fight.
      When the Jin called for war,the dressed as soldiers peasants and commoners.
      Having the outfit of a warrior doesn't make you into a real soldier.
      That's the difference.
      We must also say that the Jon had a professional militia and army as well,but Mongola were simply stronger.

    • @leitgongao6558
      @leitgongao6558 2 роки тому +19

      Mobility is another important thing. Actually Jin won many battles against the Mongols. But when Mongols lose, they can always retreat without big casualty. When Jin loses, they usually lose the entire army.

    • @PrabirKrPal
      @PrabirKrPal 2 роки тому +13

      @@leitgongao6558 Ghengis Khan's mongols didn't lose any battles against the Jin. But they lost quite a number of battles against the Song.

  • @austinreed5805
    @austinreed5805 3 роки тому +539

    The Rise of the Mongol Empire is one of the greatest conquests in human history.

    • @t3rm715
      @t3rm715 3 роки тому +29

      Clearly you've never heard of Alexander the Great

    • @ASh-oe9hm
      @ASh-oe9hm 3 роки тому +40

      @@t3rm715 and you surely you've never heard about Alexander the fake is not real lol

    • @thesoupmills1426
      @thesoupmills1426 3 роки тому +65

      @@ASh-oe9hm the fuck does that even mean

    • @michaelbohlen4762
      @michaelbohlen4762 3 роки тому +171

      @@t3rm715 Alexander the Great's conquests were meager compared to the Mongols. Alexander inherited a professional army, one of the first of its kind during the time period, from his father Phillip. Ghenghis Khan united the nomadic tribes of Mongolia, made them a professional army, and conquered a greater landmass.

    • @connor4955
      @connor4955 3 роки тому +40

      Both did great things. Plus, both lived at different time periods. What does this mean? different technology, different military tactics that worked and things like that. Also I can’t believe I have to say this but Alexander the Great ONE HUNDRED PERCENT IS REAL..
      @A Sh There are non-Greek, Babylonian texts mentioning him in Iran. Plus Zoroastrian texts as well. Stop being blinded by nationalism and take the time to look up facts. I get you love your country but you can’t deny an event happened, especially when people of that region at the time fighting Alexander are saying he was there.

  • @mukhtarsyajaratun1025
    @mukhtarsyajaratun1025 3 роки тому +103

    The benefits of the Mongols conquering China are massive, they've got skilled Chinese engineers that can build siege weapon, gunpowder, large wealth and gained many talented/skillful people around China. Its like Britain when they finally conquered India, which played a big part in the empire

    • @cs-mi8ur
      @cs-mi8ur 3 роки тому +10

      Britain conquered india with Indian banker money, same can't be said about the Mongols.

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому +4

      @@cs-mi8ur and then they used that money to buy indians to fight for them

    • @cs-mi8ur
      @cs-mi8ur 3 роки тому +3

      @@mint8648 yes and the bankers profited greatly. Few of those families still have a large wealth though they maintain obscurity. Even in the 7 years war they loaned a huge amt to the British.

    • @mukhtarsyajaratun1025
      @mukhtarsyajaratun1025 3 роки тому

      @@cs-mi8ur are the Indian currency at that time powerful compared to the British one?

    • @cs-mi8ur
      @cs-mi8ur 3 роки тому +5

      @@mukhtarsyajaratun1025 gold and silver were the most valuable of any currency.Indian bankers were to the southern,central Asia and arab peninsula in 18th century what the rothschild were to Europe in the 19th century.

  • @ScribaeEducantum
    @ScribaeEducantum 3 роки тому +60

    Success is nothing more than a few simple disciplines, practiced every day.
    Jim Rohn

  • @MrTTuguldur
    @MrTTuguldur 3 роки тому +71

    Mongols had genius military leaders that was born from the harsh time that made them tough and hardy people.

    • @TheSuperhoden
      @TheSuperhoden 3 роки тому +9

      That does make you a good general. They were good because they got promoted on quality and not inheritance

    • @clez2
      @clez2 3 роки тому +5

      Yeah subutai is best general world history

    • @TheSuperhoden
      @TheSuperhoden 3 роки тому +3

      @@clez2 why? Hamical went undefeated against the roman empire during the first punic war while being completely isolated, after the war he conquered Spain. His son spent 20 years isolated and unbeaten in Italy. Amongst other accomplishments. Oda nobunaga had some of world's most amazing victories, including beating a 30.000 strong army with a 3.000 strong army and he did it in an open battlefield. Or Fredrick from Prussia who fought Russia, Austria, France and a lot of minor nations at the same time being extremely outnumbered. Or prince Eugene of savoy, even Napoleon called him the best at some point. Or Charlemagne, "the father of europe" who basically created a massive empire covering half of Europe out of nothing. Or Saladin, the one who allowed islam to conquer half the world and who beat the Christian armies. Or tamerlane, who started from nothing, with a handful of men and he basically conquered all from nowdays turkey to the border of China. Or Maurice of nassau, he allowed a nation of 1.000.000 people to fight against the greatest empire at the moment, the Spanish empire. And they won after 80 years.
      So many generals who can also be the greatest. And then we havent even covered Aztec or inca generals or some of the leading figures to fight colonists like Tecumseh.
      Calling one the greatest is the definition of arrogance.

    • @darrenjunior3576
      @darrenjunior3576 3 роки тому

      @@TheSuperhoden that is very true my friend. Spot on!

  • @Usausausahkhk
    @Usausausahkhk 3 роки тому +108

    Note that Mongol swept through Asia to Europe in 10 years, yet at the time of Gengis Khan’s death, he could only conquer the smallest Kingdom of Xixia of China. The City of Xiang Yan stood in front of the Mongol seige for 10 years and the City of Diaoyu Shan was never captured. It was at Diaoyu Shan that Monge Khan was killed by the Song army. Mongolian conquest of China took more than seven decades of a deeply split country, and in nearly 50 years Mongols were fighting Song Dynasty. This illustrates the fact often neglected in Western history book: the East had been militarily more advanced than the West until the rise of the colonial empires. That was the reason why China defeated the Huns, and the Huns defeated Rome. And China conquered the Turks and the Turks defeated the Byzantines. But the table turned gradually in favor of the West since the 16th century, when different elements of the modern society was born in the West. In the end the modern society took over the Earth.

    • @froglifes6829
      @froglifes6829 3 роки тому +10

      Thats not true. The Mongol empire tried to invade Europe but was pushed out because the Europeans were too powerful and advanced... They lost a whole army of 30k people against Croatia. Thats just one example. Go learn history. Also the Huns didnt defeat the Romans.. They had battles where yes the Romans did lose sometimes but the collapse of their empire was not because of the Huns. You have read too much propaganda

    • @ttt9618
      @ttt9618 3 роки тому +46

      @@froglifes6829 wrong. Subutai defeated Europe and Russia with just a scouting army lol. Your European pope, france, byzantine used to send gifts to Mongol khan hence maintaining diplomacy. But after Mongol empire split up Mongols became weak hence came there defeat but in height of power Mongols were the strongest.

    • @froglifes6829
      @froglifes6829 3 роки тому +3

      @@ttt9618 Go learn history. There is a reason why the Mongols couldnt make it to central or western Europe... Because they were not advanced or strong enough. Again over 30k mongols lost to Croats... You can say am wrong but you cant change history ;)
      go back to school and study instead of being stupid. if the Mongols were strong in the first place the empire wouldnt split up.. The mongols stood no chance against Europeans. They could only make it to ukraine... Again go learn history.

    • @giles4565
      @giles4565 3 роки тому +3

      @@ttt9618 The Venetian crossbow men and long bows of Central and western Europe were far more powerful and longer range than anything the Mongols had. They failed to conquire Europe because of this

    • @Usausausahkhk
      @Usausausahkhk 3 роки тому +48

      @@froglifes6829 The Mongols did not go further into Europe because Gengis Khan died at He lan mountain in conquering Xixia, and the sons need to go back and elect the new great Khan. They did not go back because the weak resistance of the Europeans. Just go back and read how they sacked Kiev Russia and defeated Hungary. No real and serious history will say that the Mongol stopped because the Europeans pushed them back, despite the Europeans, especially the Hungarians fought bravely but got defeated. The second great Mongol expedition were called First Sons expedition. Again, the Egyptian Mamuluke victory, the only major victory against the Mongols was not the reason why the Mongols stopped. The Great Mongol Khan Monge was killed by Song firepower at Diaoyu Shan city. And Holaku khan was one of the candidates for the Great Khan and that was why he pulled army back to East Iran to seek the great khan position. Geghis Khan’s death in conquering Xiaxia and Monge Khan’s death in the war with Song were the reasons why the two Mongol western expedition stopped. By then, the Golden Horde Khandate was already at war with Holaku khan, and the Mongol civil war stopped the Mongols from further invasion into Europe. In the East, Diaoyu Shan city stood in front of the Mongol invaders for 36 years and did not fall. In comparison, the Western great cities usually fall in less than a week when facing a major invasion.

  • @tongmu5881
    @tongmu5881 3 роки тому +16

    Mongolia is a historical accident. In 100 years, three powerful nomadic empires have emerged in the grasslands of northern China. The Han people (Song) lost the Great Wall and cavalry (horse-producing area) in continuous wars with them. After the rise of Mongolia, the army that concentrated in Arabia, Central Asia, and Europe destroyed Song in the war of attrition. (One city was besieged for forty years before surrendering). This is unique among nomads.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 3 роки тому +221

    you got to admire just how impressive the Mongol army was

    • @scintillam_dei
      @scintillam_dei 3 роки тому +15

      The Mongol Empire: "Knock knock."
      Dai Viet: "Who's there?"
      The Mongol Empire: "The mothertickling MONGOL EFFIN EMPIRE BEEATCH!"
      Dai Viet: "Oh. It's you. Go away."
      The Mongol Empire: "Are you DEAF!?"
      Dai Viet: "No. Yu is blind."
      The Mongol Empire: "I'm not blind. YOU blind!"
      Dai Viet: "That is what I just said!"
      The Mongol Empire: "You just said what!?"
      Dai Viet: "Exactly."
      The Mongol Empire: "All right, I'm tired of playing games! Prepare yourself to DIE!!!"
      Dai Viet: "Can't say Dai Viet without 'die'.... oh... wait!"
      The Mongol Empire: "You just jinxxed yourself, boi!"
      Dai Viet: "Whatever. Come at me with your best shot."
      The Mongol Empire: "My nerves are nervous from WRATH!" DIE!"
      Dai Viet: "Haha! You died in a filthy SWAMP!" ... oh... wait!"
      The Mongol Empire: "You got lucky thi time. NEXT TIME NOT!"
      Dai Viet: "Blah blah blah. Get lost!"
      The Mongol Empire: "I'm back!"
      Dai Viet: "Ha! You died in a stinkin' cesspool swamp AGAIN!"
      The Mongol Empire: "You have short-term memory. Stop dissing your country!"
      Dai Viet: "I have hordes of mosquitoes. You cannot defeat me!"
      The Mongol Empire: "Third time's a charm! OUr arrows will blot out the SUN TSU! See what I did there?"
      Dai Viet: "No. I' told you I'm blind. Regardles, we shall fight in the SHADE!"
      The Mongol Empire: "WAAAAAAAAAAA!!! WE DONE DIED A-GIN!!!!"
      Tune in next episode for when the mothertickling Mongol EFFIN Empire knocks on Egypt's door!

    • @carlneoh5843
      @carlneoh5843 3 роки тому +9

      @@scintillam_dei meanwhile Japan: typhoon go brr

    • @NightPhoenix.Y
      @NightPhoenix.Y 3 роки тому +10

      They were impressive militarilly mainly due to them excepting help from other ppl in their war efforts .wana break chinese walls recruit chinese ppl, wana move to and invade russia ally with the local nomads, wana make siege on european castles get some turkish engineers to built trebuchets.

    • @micahistory
      @micahistory 3 роки тому

      @@scintillam_dei lol

    • @Minadarling119
      @Minadarling119 3 роки тому +3

      @@scintillam_dei Bro the Mongol Empire was a hollow shell of what it was when it tried taking Vietnam.
      4- factors
      Disadvantage #1-Mongols wore heavy fur and in humid swamps with mosquitos and disease, considering the fact they come from cold climate it didn’t work in their favor
      Disadvantage #2-No clue of the region
      Disadvantage #3- No Genghis Khan
      Disadvantage #4- Mongol armies sent to Vietnam was only a small platoon and also shell of the what the empire once was
      If any one of those disadvantage was never there Vietnam sandal warriors would have easily gotten steam rolled like a dumpling 😂
      Imagine sending the armies of the Four Khanates during its might to Vietnam 😂
      Lol Viets think they tough because God gave them an inhospitable regional advantage.
      Viet: “We tough because of Jungle”
      Wait what if you don’t have jungle then what?
      Put a Viet on a flat plane of grass and let him fight a Mongolian, I wanna see who wins 😂
      The Mongolian would use the Viet as his personal toothpick when he’s on his daily high protein diet
      Mongolian would look like a bodybuilder and the Viet would look like a malnourished child 😂🤣🤣🤣

  • @panchokuan
    @panchokuan 3 роки тому +31

    Actually, historic official documents showed the Song knew they should aid Jin instead of corporating with mongols but the Song people refused to do so after many years war. And who raised aidding Jin in the court were attacked by political opponents…which left Song no choice as Jin would be conquered by mongols anyway.

  • @diegomendez5646
    @diegomendez5646 3 роки тому +31

    Absolutely magnificent. Please don't stop making these amazing content :)

  • @Himmel-nh5ws
    @Himmel-nh5ws 2 роки тому +55

    Interesting fact: When Kublai Khan was about to conquer the Southern Song Dynasty (China),he became emperor of China.And changed the Mongol Empire into the Yuan Dynasty, China.China has successfully survived in this way

    • @moozillamoo2109
      @moozillamoo2109 Рік тому +6

      That's just for the enslaved. Mongols didn't believe in this nonsense, as they ruled mostly from Mongolia. Bug apparently you do.

    • @hiyukelavie2396
      @hiyukelavie2396 Рік тому +19

      ​@@moozillamoo2109 But they did
      Kublai Khan and the Yuan dynasty became so Chinese that they were rejected by the other Mongols

    • @ganbatmunkhtur9048
      @ganbatmunkhtur9048 Рік тому +2

      @@hiyukelavie2396 not rejected due to being too chinese but they backed different people in the civil war. And killing of Most of Oguudei lineage is what made Tului lineage or Khublai khan rejected by other Mongol khanate. if you read into the history of Chingis khaans 4 sons family it's so clear.

    • @smartwatcherss5718
      @smartwatcherss5718 Рік тому +6

      The mongols became Chinese in the End

    • @dingleberry4234
      @dingleberry4234 Рік тому +6

      @@smartwatcherss5718anyone who tried to conquer them did 😅

  • @SupremeLeaderKimJong-un
    @SupremeLeaderKimJong-un 3 роки тому +191

    Nice going, Genghis! I bet that will last, a long time-
    *COLLAPSES*

    • @miliba
      @miliba 3 роки тому +17

      Glorious Leader Kim!

    • @lolsmo395
      @lolsmo395 3 роки тому +12

      shutup kim

    • @Sovnarkom
      @Sovnarkom 3 роки тому +11

      glorious leader posts glorious comment. Lol and Mongolia!

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 3 роки тому +18

      Longer than Alexander's

    • @kalebloshbough1551
      @kalebloshbough1551 3 роки тому +8

      Did your sister allow you to write that

  • @Internut1985
    @Internut1985 3 роки тому +53

    Mongols used Southern China against Northern China (Jurchens ) and when they succeeded they flip the script and used the North against the South. So basically the Chinese helped defeat each other. In fact during the wars , the Han Chinese banners who fought for the Mongols outnumbered the actual Mongols

    • @XuerLi
      @XuerLi 2 роки тому

      You are right, the major commanders sent by Yuan to conquer Southern Song were northern Chinese and even some defected southern Chinese generals, like Zhang Hongfan, Shi Tianze, because China is a culturally diverse vast land and peoples do not have a common national identity.

    • @Internut1985
      @Internut1985 2 роки тому +2

      @@XuerLi thank you ! And vice versa. The Southern Song helped the Mongols fight the “hated “ Jin dynasty in the North.
      Chinese history is fascinating. I am also very intrigued by the struggle between the settled “civilized” Chinese and the a “barbarian” nomads (Mongols, Turks ) .
      Greetings from Somalia 🇸🇴

    • @kentneiljumao-ascandido2409
      @kentneiljumao-ascandido2409 2 роки тому +3

      divided and conquer

    • @user-qwertyuiopasdfghj
      @user-qwertyuiopasdfghj 2 роки тому +6

      Northern China is not Jurchen just conquered by Jurchens. At that time Jurchens and Song are enemies. Song hated Jurchens more than the mongols and always try to take back its old home territory aka central plain.

    • @sideriteadamantium4300
      @sideriteadamantium4300 2 роки тому +3

      Back then, people did not have a strong conception of race or ethnicity. Also contrary to popular perceptions, the Mongols were not particularly brutal towards the Chinese. Most deaths in China occurred due to famine and disease (Black Death) during the Yuan dynasty

  • @maxsheng8215
    @maxsheng8215 3 роки тому +12

    The song Chinese fought well against the Mongols. Until the Mongols brought Trebuchet from the middle east to break their city walls at xiang yang. A major city on the Yangtze River.

  • @AXXXOLO
    @AXXXOLO 3 роки тому +47

    lmao the chinese literally thought they could use the mongols to deal with their enemies and then just simply deal with the mongols later

    • @Emilechen
      @Emilechen 3 роки тому +39

      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6ngke_Khan
      to be fair, Chinese deal with thr Mongols much better than many nations,
      at least Song Dynasty managed to killed thr Mongol emperor Mongke Khan in Diaoyu siege, dute to his death, Great Mongol Empire splits into four Khanates,

    • @eee9034
      @eee9034 3 роки тому +1

      @@Emilechen and one of that khagnates ruled over china, right?

    • @alvaro701
      @alvaro701 3 роки тому +1

      @@Emilechen The Kanates exist since the creation of the Mongols empire. The Mongols split into different kingdom because of the push of Kublai khan against the elect Great Khan.
      Shame on him!

    • @auburntiger6829
      @auburntiger6829 3 роки тому +1

      @@alvaro701 To be fair, most folks would’ve done the same. Kublai Khan did most of the dirty work of conquest in China, and what did the elected khan do? Why would you freely hand over someone something you worked so hard for over night, right? You would most likely take what you and your men fought and died for and keep it.

    • @bx9258
      @bx9258 2 роки тому +1

      You literally have no clue what you are talking about

  • @sixtails-
    @sixtails- 3 роки тому +32

    china did fall to mogolian eventually, but it took them 48 years to conquest. There were none a single country could hold on a resist against the mongolian that long, most of them fell within 2 months

    • @PrabirKrPal
      @PrabirKrPal 3 роки тому +13

      Just think, Khwarezmian Empire, was one of the strongest Empires at that time, with the cities of Urgench and Nishapur being some of the wealthiest cities of the world. But even with all that the Empire fell to the Mongols in three short years.

    • @SzHo-lz1rl
      @SzHo-lz1rl 8 місяців тому +9

      And this was based on the fact that China itself was in a state of division at that time. Otherwise, it would be impossible to be conquered so easily.

    • @ranjava5550
      @ranjava5550 5 місяців тому

      Korea held their own for around 40 years and they were way more weaker and poorer than China.

    • @justinwillingale2086
      @justinwillingale2086 5 місяців тому

      The only people to resist was Vietnam even the Mongols cut their losses

    • @jasonmai4771
      @jasonmai4771 5 місяців тому

      @@justinwillingale2086 Vietnam got a good geography location to resist the Mogols invasion that the mogol horse was really hard to adapt that area and all the mountains surrounding between China and vietnam...

  • @user-ausabc2024
    @user-ausabc2024 2 роки тому +11

    The biggest part is a lots of Han army surrendered and joined Mongols troop. Mongols also used Chinese dynasty name YUAN (元) to be part of China.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 3 роки тому +18

    it's crazy that the tiny Mongols were able to rule over such vast areas

    • @numeron509
      @numeron509 3 роки тому

      Nice tale

    • @micahistory
      @micahistory 3 роки тому

      @Ali Kılıç same

    • @arolemaprarath6615
      @arolemaprarath6615 3 роки тому +1

      @Ali Kılıç It didn't last a century but yes, they were very impressive. Greeks are the best!

    • @kerriwilson7732
      @kerriwilson7732 3 роки тому +3

      These weren't "tiny" Mongols. These were all "life-sized".

    • @micahistory
      @micahistory 3 роки тому

      @@kerriwilson7732 ok karen

  • @Clee-os6pv
    @Clee-os6pv 3 роки тому +23

    2:08
    I already knew about this and learned from this already. The key advantage why the Mongols conquer China was they were disunited. And the Mongols came at a perfect time when China wasn't as one. Also China wasn't very strong at this point.
    EDIT:
    China has defeated the Mongols before just look at the Han-Xiongnu War 漢匈戰爭 in 133 BC.

    • @auburntiger6829
      @auburntiger6829 3 роки тому

      Song China would never have entered an alliance with the Jurchen Jin again after the Rape of Jingkang.

    • @PrabirKrPal
      @PrabirKrPal 3 роки тому +7

      China wasn't strong at this point. Lol!!
      China was disunited yes, but they were far from weak. During the mongol invasion, The Jin Empire alone managed to raise an army, that outnumbered the mongols Ten to One.

    • @fybrogen7473
      @fybrogen7473 3 роки тому +7

      Disunited or not, Mongols were outnumbered all the time. Just look at the battle of yehuling. 100k Mongol cavalry vs 1.4m Jin various troops and the great wall at their side.

    • @beautifullife1881
      @beautifullife1881 2 роки тому

      Do you think Mongols are united? They are much more diverse than Chinese, but they know how to cooperate, not like Chinese.

    • @choikluivertchoi4635
      @choikluivertchoi4635 2 роки тому

      @@beautifullife1881 Mongols are Chinese too. Lol.

  • @powerbar1981
    @powerbar1981 3 роки тому +27

    Song : We have Mandate of Heaven
    Jin : We have a lot princess and bribes
    Xia : We have Xia Xia Xia...
    Mongols : Good, we have Chinese Engineers, European engineers, Specialists technologies. Advanced!! XIA XIAXIA first...
    Me : They did attack Xia Xia Xia LOL!!!

  • @davinciboimusic
    @davinciboimusic 10 місяців тому +4

    My heart breaks knowing how the little Song Emperor was thrown off the cliff to his death when the Mongols besieged their land... Much love to the Song Dynasty!

    • @rainnyday7614
      @rainnyday7614 7 місяців тому

      😂

    • @SamBrockmann
      @SamBrockmann 5 місяців тому +2

      The Song were just as barbaric as their Mongol enemies.

    • @davinciboimusic
      @davinciboimusic 5 місяців тому

      @@SamBrockmann they all have barbaric nature

  • @watchman835
    @watchman835 3 роки тому +35

    Based on how weak Mongol is today, how brutal Mongol was when they conquered and slaughtered their enemies, and how well they are perceived by people 1000 years later. I have reached a conclusion. That is *end justify means, history only favour winners.*

    • @gkdlmlnl7697
      @gkdlmlnl7697 3 роки тому +3

      China today is basically base on the Mongol n han assimilation

    • @Emilechen
      @Emilechen 3 роки тому +7

      event a the peak of Mongol Empire,
      Mongol warriors are powerful but thir economy in their homeland is still weak,
      so in their empire, Mongolian steppe's economy get marginalized by other region,
      once Mongol rulers and warriors lose and go back to heir homeland, thry will become poor agains, such is the question :s

    • @Emilechen
      @Emilechen 3 роки тому

      @@gkdlmlnl7697 not really, Mongol Yan dynasty didn't stay longtime in Chinese core land,

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 3 роки тому +3

      That's because back then almost all men and boys between age 13 and 50 were trained and equited to fight. They all had horses, armor, spears, and most importantly bows. They lacked heavy infantry and most importantly engineers and skilled Smith's but China was weak and has always been willingy to serve anyone who sits on their imperial throne so when they rolled over so easily when the mongols invaded it provided the mongols with top quality enginees to build siege weapons, build siege works, build bridges, perform logistics, and it gave them Smith's to make top quality armor and weapons.
      Mongolia went into the war with China as a half decent army with many weak points but China rolling over so easily gave them everything they needed to March across the continent.
      Much like Rome during the western half of their empire collapsing; China was more focused on internal fighting then on external threats and it caused a global ripple.

    • @alvaro701
      @alvaro701 3 роки тому +2

      Maybe because there was a lot of propaganda against them. The Mongols weren't worse than any Chinese Muslim or European Kingdom

  • @prrfrrpurochicas
    @prrfrrpurochicas 3 роки тому +5

    Love that you covered this topic and such other topics.

  • @khalee95
    @khalee95 3 роки тому +20

    The Mongols may not have ruled long, but they did rule over kings, queens, princes and princesses. The king of kings.

  • @googane7755
    @googane7755 3 роки тому +7

    The Song's fear of their military wasn't unfounded. As this video stated, there was a real fear of rebellion and there was a huge number of chinese already defecting to the mongols which only fueled this paranoia.

    • @りんごT-i3t
      @りんごT-i3t 2 роки тому +1

      Central Asian countries, Europe and India were vulnerable, China resisted Mongolia for 70 years, the emperor and ministers of the Song Dynasty committed suicide

  • @sinoroman
    @sinoroman 3 роки тому +7

    why did you choose those portraits for western xia and jurchen jin? those are qing pictures

    • @NightPhoenix.Y
      @NightPhoenix.Y 3 роки тому

      yeah this 'documentary' is poorly written. Try this list instead ua-cam.com/play/PLaBYW76inbX6rwW39kRuJ-DvG4hE7vEFC.html

  • @ElBandito
    @ElBandito 3 роки тому +13

    Bunch of steppe nomads with bows and arrows took on nations which had 100 times their population, huge defensive cities, as well as early gunpowder weapons? The size of Mongols' balls! That feat was comparable to modern day Mongolia somehow defeating modern day Russia--impossibly amazing.

    • @kharlmichaelpura371
      @kharlmichaelpura371 Рік тому

      You realize that Mongol empire is a gun empire that can easily defeat and conquer Russia in a minute

    • @kharlmichaelpura371
      @kharlmichaelpura371 Рік тому

      Amazing how Russia is backward

  • @lerneanlion
    @lerneanlion 3 роки тому +16

    And to think this can be traced to Western Xia's refusal to give the military aid to Genghis Khan when he was going to invade Central Asia. I wonder what will happened if they actually willing to become allies instead.

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 3 роки тому +2

      And if genghis died in childhood when his family was abandoned then his empire also wouldn't of been possible. Such is the butterfly effect...

    • @lordInquisitor
      @lordInquisitor 3 роки тому +7

      He would have thanked him right before invading his lands , look how he treated the other Chinese allies

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 3 роки тому

      @@lordInquisitor It's so funny to me that everyone at the time was so eager to go to war as they each had their own plans of dominating the area. The khwarezm shah, the jurchen jin, the song, etc. What set the mongols out was that they were just better at it.

    • @lordInquisitor
      @lordInquisitor 3 роки тому +3

      @@googane7755 well better as in they were masters of tactics that the other powers had little knowledge off . I would bet that the biggest factors in Mongol success was the horse archer , fear and the fact that the open plain is basically custom made for horses and horse riders

    • @syhossp
      @syhossp 3 роки тому +2

      Genghis Khan will still invaded Jin. While Mongolia was not united, Jin raid the Mongol all the time. One of the Genghis Khan ancestor was murder by Jin. So Genghis Khan hate Jin and is determined to payback on what Jin done to his people.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 3 роки тому +77

    It's crazy that such an old and massive civilisation was completely conquered by some nomads

    • @ephraimboateng5239
      @ephraimboateng5239 3 роки тому +40

      well, it makes sense when that civilisation was divided on itself while the mongols took their time to conquer bits of territory AND the locals were supporting them AND the Song Dynasty and a weak army while being attaked on 3 sides. If china would have been united, the mongols would've never conquered them, and if the song dynasty wasn't so paranoid of its own army, they probably wouldv'e resisted longer and even survive until the inevitable collaspe of the Yuan Dynasty

    • @sjohn1186
      @sjohn1186 3 роки тому +22

      Not some nomads, the strongest nomads in the whole human history.

    • @fromfareast3070
      @fromfareast3070 3 роки тому +2

      @@sjohn1186 Follow by the jurchen Qing

    • @micahistory
      @micahistory 3 роки тому +2

      @Regular dude on internet. but the vikings didn't create a massive continent wide empire

    • @micahistory
      @micahistory 3 роки тому +1

      @@ephraimboateng5239 yes

  • @jrexx2841
    @jrexx2841 3 роки тому +19

    8:00 Ah yes, Mongke

    • @scintillam_dei
      @scintillam_dei 3 роки тому

      Mongke Khan was the recinarnation of a Chinese general. China conquered China. Not the Mongols. Genghis Khanwas the preincarnation of Mao Zedong, obviously.

  • @cdab3192
    @cdab3192 2 роки тому +7

    Nice work totally but some mistakes:
    1,the appearance of the king of Xia and JINN is wrong,the video showed the clothes and hairstyle of Qing dynasty,the last chinese dynasty.
    2,the position of Xiangyang is wrong.
    3,the last battle between Song and Mongol empire happened in Yashan ,not Yamen

  • @mayazmahmud1740
    @mayazmahmud1740 3 роки тому +10

    a really great topic to watch before using hui hui pao on song dynasty in Age of Empires 4

  • @papazataklaattiranimam
    @papazataklaattiranimam 3 роки тому +37

    Happy Mongolic noises
    Sad Tungusic, Sinitic and Tangut noises

  • @云君-b2w
    @云君-b2w 2 роки тому +3

    1.1. The Jin people were the female real people who lived in the Heilongjiang region, a fishing and herding civilization, and were a subordinate tribe of the Khitan (Liao) in the early days. These female real people were not from the Joseon region. Because today's Korea and Korea in fact belonged to the Three Korean tribes during the Tang Dynasty, they joined forces with the Tang Dynasty to fight against Goguryeo (the successor of Wei's Korea, a nation of local tribes and Yan exiles) eventually forming Silla, which is the ancestor of today's Koreans and Korean people.
    2. Before the rise of the Mongols, it was the Turkic people, the enemies of the Tang Dynasty, who controlled the Mongolian plateau, but after Li Shimin, Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, wiped out the Eastern Turkic and Western Turkic peoples, a vacuum period arose in the nomadic plateau region. This land was successively contested by the Hui falcons, the Shatuo Turks, the Dang Xiang Qiang (also the ancestors of the Western Xia), and the Khitan. The final victors were the Khitan, who established the Liao Kingdom, but the Khitan, who already controlled northern China, did not want to return to nomadic areas. The Mongols emerged from this process, and Genghis Khan's great-grandfather, Hepbul Khan, united the various tribes and gave rise to the concept of the Mongols. Hebure Khan defeated the Khitan several times, but was forced to submit due to the huge power gap between the two sides.
    3. AD1236-AD1242, the Mongols attacked the then many principalities of Rus' and defeated their allied forces.
    In AD1240-AD1241, this army led by Battuta, Speedy, Mongol, and Guiyu was divided into two groups and took amazing high speed maneuvers to surround and tempt the enemy deeper in the Battle of Legnica and the Battle of Tisza River to annihilate the main Hungarian and Polish armies. They also created false king's documents to deceive the nobles all over Hungary after attacking Hungary and occupying Pest and Bra.
    In AD1242, the Mongols invaded the Second Bulgarian Empire and Bulgaria became a vassal state of Mongolia.
    4. Genghis Khan died before defeating the Southern Song Dynasty, and AD 1258, the Mongol Khan Mongol died in the Battle of Diaoyu Castle. In fact, the Mongols' fighting power was the most amazing in this period. The unique geography of Vietnam can also be seen here indeed while the battle of Ilkhanate against Mamluk, which represents the rapid decline of Mongol fighting power, took place in AD1281.
    It is important to mention here that the geography of the Vietnamese region and the strength of their resistance were equally impressive. AD 1257, AD 1284-AD 1288, the Mongol invasion of Vietnam, the Vietnamese Chen dynasty defeated the forces of the Yuan dynasty several times (this period saw a Mongol heir crisis after the death of Mongol, but at least nominally Kublai defeated the other contenders for the position of Mongol Khan, but except for The khanates outside Ilkhanate were not actually subservient. (At the same time he crowned himself Emperor of the Great Yuan.) . In war after war, the Yuan dynasty was surprised by the tenacity of Vietnam and began to increase its leverage. The Vietnamese Chen dynasty eventually became bitter at this endless invasion and was forced to choose to become a vassal state. The Mongols, on the other hand, turned their attention to Burma.
    5. The Mongols are divided into many branches, the western Nai Mongols are Christian and followers of Nestorianism, while the eastern Muroves are descendants of the Xianbei people left over from the Han dynasty. The central and southern Mongols were under the command of Genghis Khan's Golden Family. The northern Mongols, on the other hand, were known to them as the Khalkha Mongols, and these northern Mongols were made up of tribes affiliated with the Mongols. This continues to this day, and since the secession of Mongolia from the Republic of China since World War II, their main population is the Khalkha Mongols.
    6. We have to understand in any case that the rise of the Mongols in the 13th century was essentially a cataclysm. He was in no way inferior to the destruction of Arab civilization by the Turkic Ghulam, or to the destruction of Western Rome by the Huns and Goths and Vandals. Every civilization that resisted them should be proud of it.

  • @coffeemanx
    @coffeemanx 9 місяців тому +2

    Mongols were united. China was fragmented. Unity is true strength.

  • @tritium1998
    @tritium1998 3 роки тому +19

    A glaring omission about the Mongols invading Europe and the Middle East first, acquiring engineers and technology from there to fight in China.

    • @leogogo7041
      @leogogo7041 3 роки тому +14

      At that time, Europe's military and technology was just rubbish.

    • @jamesray1439
      @jamesray1439 3 роки тому

      @@leogogo7041 ok lol

    • @ost8123
      @ost8123 3 роки тому +2

      不!实际上是蒙古人掠夺走中国的工程师和武器,包括火药和枪炮,征服了西方世界。

    • @young-t6u2m
      @young-t6u2m 11 місяців тому

      Mongolia's rise is in the northern part of China, okay?

  • @DGronki
    @DGronki 3 роки тому +6

    I am interested in how Mongols conquer Lhasa and how/if they fight in such high altitude?

    • @6principlesforcartography61
      @6principlesforcartography61 3 роки тому +1

      No they didn't. Tibet surrendered before Mongols enter their land

    • @sansan2591
      @sansan2591 3 роки тому +3

      @@6principlesforcartography61 nope Tibetans actually fought against Mongols. Mongols sent Turko-Mongolic soldiers to defeat them

    • @6principlesforcartography61
      @6principlesforcartography61 3 роки тому +4

      @@sansan2591 It was a border conflict, yet the Tibetan Lamas realized the strength of Mongols and chose to surrender before Mongols reached the the inner land. They made a treaty in Liangzhou (modern Wuwei in Gansu Province), where the Tibetans agree to pay taxes and allow Mongols to field army in their land.

    • @6principlesforcartography61
      @6principlesforcartography61 3 роки тому +3

      By the way, Lhasa was not the pollical center of Tibet though. It was Saskya, where the Pandita Lama lives. He was one of the religious leaders in Tibet. At that time, Tibet had been scattered into many small feudal lands and was not unified for centuries, with each feudal lords had only a few hundred soldiers.

  • @hassanabdulsalam1000
    @hassanabdulsalam1000 3 роки тому +45

    Just like how Rome conquered Greece

    • @dabome4001
      @dabome4001 3 роки тому +1

      How Rome conquered Greece? Im asking for real

    • @erik5303
      @erik5303 3 роки тому +25

      @@dabome4001 By being allies with one greek city state and make them turn on another until they all were under Romes influence. Very simplified ofcourse.

    • @papazataklaattiranimam
      @papazataklaattiranimam 3 роки тому

      Sad Hellenes

    • @GlaciaDay
      @GlaciaDay 3 роки тому +8

      Also just like Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece, some Mongols adopted Chinese culture as well then formed the Yuan Dynasty.

    • @papazataklaattiranimam
      @papazataklaattiranimam 3 роки тому

      @@GlaciaDay Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic and Para-Mongolic nomads adopted Sinitic culture who ruled China

  • @KR-uq2ns
    @KR-uq2ns 2 роки тому +7

    Yeah, only took mongols 45 years to conquer southern song with help of Chinese military adviser and scarification of one khan, who’s death stop its army march further into Europe.

  • @00jack80
    @00jack80 11 місяців тому +2

    China's geographical location is relatively closed, and ancient Chinese believed that the world was composed of the Central Plains civilization world, northern nomadic peoples, southern tribes, and the distant West. Mongolia has played an important role in Chinese history and has always been a powerful opponent of the Central Plains dynasties

  • @brokenbridge6316
    @brokenbridge6316 3 роки тому +10

    A nicely informative video. Details pretty well how the Mongols were able to do what they did.

  • @elijahjohnson601
    @elijahjohnson601 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this video!

  • @yesyes1842
    @yesyes1842 3 роки тому +5

    To be more accurate, the "Song" dynasty is considered the Han chinese state at the time, with the Jin dynasty being foreign invaders. So the video showed the conquest of people that were ancestors to manchurians, other northern central asian states and then "China" during the Song battles. The Song did not team up with mongolians to fight other Chinese states, they considered the Manchurians to be invaders and thought they would be able to gain more of their homeland back by teaming up with the Mongols, in which they did accomplish initially....

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah they were all considered foreigners by the Han Chinese which explains their unwillingness to co-operate and may have thought the Jin were just another barbarian state no different from the Mongols so the Song didn't care who they were screwing over.

    • @yesyes1842
      @yesyes1842 2 роки тому

      Googane Your post reflects some deep stereotypes on the Han Chinese race. Keep in mind their country is being invaded by Manchurians and Mongols. There is no cooperation when your country is being invaded. Lol. They were making decisions based on what they feel is best to protect their country and Manchus arent chinese, that land isn’t theirs. Get it? Mongols promised (they lied) we’ll take our the manchurians and you’ll get your state back.
      Alot of ancient civilizations thought of outsiders as barbarians just like Rome did of the Germans. Youre saying the han chinese were wrong for being invaded and not cooperating, lol. Funny stuff.

    • @svdvan8797
      @svdvan8797 Рік тому

      Yes, Song is Han Chinese state, but Yuan is not. And then Ming is Han Chinese state but Qing is not. So that you can undrstand why there were so many rebels from civilians after Ming dynasty fell down.

  • @damnedcarrot
    @damnedcarrot 3 роки тому +9

    Divide and conquer. Classic.

  • @hyltoniali257
    @hyltoniali257 3 роки тому +2

    How Mongols united Gobi steppe: Temujin exploited OngKhan of Keraits, his orth father's strength
    How Mongols defeated Jin main force at Yehuling: Jin troops didn't use their advantage in numbers, too dispersed, HuShahu ran with his reinforcement
    How XiLiao (Kara khitai) got annexed: Exploited internal conflict: Kuchalug overthrowal
    Why Tangut populations are mostly wiped out: XiXia concubine bit off Temujin's genital...jk, they failed to aid Mongol with reinforcement on their Western conquest & Temujin's benefactor: Heda'An was killed by XiXia border guards
    Why did Song's last stand fail? Chinese attacked by more surrendered Chinese

  • @agathonchristianto9580
    @agathonchristianto9580 3 роки тому +25

    The most logical explanation of why the mongol can conquer chinese dynasty which have plenty of heavily fortified city is that the mongol is waging a war of attrition.
    First, the mongol army (that consist mostly of lightly armored cavalry archer) can easily harrassed the chinese army while also avoiding pitched battle with the chinese army by doing hit and run tactic. The chinese army that have no answer to that will become demoralized and will seek shelter behind walled city to avoid being harrassed further.
    Second, the mongol will pillage and loot the countryside and lightly fortified/defended city not only to obtain loot and food supply for themselves but also to drive/herd the mass populace to take shelter inside a walled city.
    After that they just need to wait for those city that was overpopulated by the refugee to either starve themselves to death simply surrender. That would explain why a lot of city defender easily surenderred against the invader. Because by the time they open their gate to invite the masses their fate was sealed. Instead of the mongol they will face food shortages and the possible threat from starved soldier and civilian mutiny instead.

    • @leexingha
      @leexingha 3 роки тому +9

      @Ali Kılıç "lack of true combat skill and physical stamina was their biggest weakness" - you must be high on drugs

    • @froglifes6829
      @froglifes6829 3 роки тому +6

      @@leexingha What he said isnt completly false. China has relied on the fact that they have more men many times in history,and when it does not go their way countless of men die. Not to mention the Chinese were lacking combat experience and skill when fighting the Mongals.

    • @leexingha
      @leexingha 3 роки тому +4

      @@froglifes6829 having more numbers in war is always an advantage exploited by anyone

    • @froglifes6829
      @froglifes6829 3 роки тому +2

      @@leexingha Yes and do you know which country on Earth has had and has currently the most people? China even now exploits its people. Thats how China stays rich. But its not exploited by everyone. Thats where you are wrong.

    • @NightPhoenix.Y
      @NightPhoenix.Y 3 роки тому +2

      Pretty much after the collapse of the xixia the mongols already have access to chinese ppl who are knowledgable in siege warfare. And after many chinese and proto-machu ppl defected from the jin, they had a substantial amount of infantry and siege engineers to back up their light calvalry and after the fall of Kaifeng, they have access to gunpowder. Arabic and european scholars at the time the ones to survive the mogols raids into europe staited that the mongols used 'greekfire' and 'chinese arrows' in their battles to burn anyone and everything in their way. Only castles on high up mountains were safe. The mongols were effective mainly due to them using the enemy against the enemy as they recruited almost anyone to fight with them from koreans to turks.
      Tho they do have their short comings it took them 44 years to break Song defenses (the song lasted longer than anyone else) and they took the worse time to invade Japan, when the seas and weather was calm which is a sign a typhoon is coming ya know calm before the storm.

  • @FirstLast-di5sr
    @FirstLast-di5sr Рік тому +1

    3:55 I guess that guy never heard of the concept of an existential threat 😂

  • @aminyt8742
    @aminyt8742 3 роки тому +11

    They have Huge balls

  • @ty814
    @ty814 11 місяців тому +1

    2 bloods I love most Emperor Charlemagne and Genghis. 1 pinch of blood from them you become a emperor material. Although Babur got most of his domains from being the descendant of Amir Timur also his legit claim on India was to have Lahore which his ancestor Timur conquered, Babur got his real legitimancy from being the descendant of Genghis .

  • @history_people
    @history_people 3 роки тому +17

    Exelent animation, thanks

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 3 роки тому +1

    Nicely explained.

  • @kamiljan_ashiri
    @kamiljan_ashiri 2 роки тому +5

    8:36 Territory of Chaghatai khanate is wrong there, it was much bigger

  • @AverytheCubanAmerican
    @AverytheCubanAmerican 3 роки тому +8

    When you had so many children that 16 million people are related to you:
    *I am aware of the effect I have on human population*

    • @pottsie_era
      @pottsie_era 3 роки тому +1

      those 16 Million people should start a new dynasty.

    • @scintillam_dei
      @scintillam_dei 3 роки тому

      I cringe whenever I see the gay US of AIDS flag. See my video proving the US funds ISIS. The US should fall, and will, thank God.

    • @arolemaprarath6615
      @arolemaprarath6615 3 роки тому

      I'm one of them.
      Sending regards to my 16 mllion relatives and in counting!

  • @victorye7150
    @victorye7150 3 роки тому +7

    In short ! The Chinese assisted mongols conquer their own nation.

  • @mr.wilson9941
    @mr.wilson9941 3 роки тому +6

    As someone Who played total war medieval 2 i know why they were so formidable.

  • @userwsyz
    @userwsyz 3 роки тому +3

    The Mongol empire probably is the largest empire in human history. No other empire has conquered so much land areas as the Mongols did. The closest to it probably is the Russian empire, which was also part of the Mongol empire in the thirteenth century.

    • @zyanego3170
      @zyanego3170 3 роки тому +3

      The British Empire was bigger.

    • @zuzudernegger9721
      @zuzudernegger9721 3 роки тому +15

      @@zyanego3170 The British had guns and fought aborigines with boomerangs and stone axes. The Mongols fought equal and more advanced civilizations. The British never had much success conquering anything in Europe even when fighting agains lesser European countries. The British were really good at piracy not so much at warring but against Australian aborigines and Eskimos they were great!

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому

      @@zuzudernegger9721 they did conquer more advanced civilizations like india, but only with banking money

    • @userwsyz
      @userwsyz 3 роки тому +1

      @@zyanego3170 the British empire occupied 25%of the land areas of the earth. Mongol empire occupied at least 1/3 of the land areas of the earth.

    • @zyanego3170
      @zyanego3170 3 роки тому +3

      @@userwsyz Wrong.

  • @efficient64
    @efficient64 2 роки тому +2

    Basically the entire mongol army: bunch of dudes riding horses

  • @markocroatia7630
    @markocroatia7630 3 роки тому +13

    And now China revenge to them historically when they took Inner Mongolia.

    • @limhock604
      @limhock604 3 роки тому +8

      Except majority of china are illegitimate spawns of Temujin

    • @yeshiyangzom8532
      @yeshiyangzom8532 3 роки тому +6

      Inner Mongolia is just a name, historically, 80% of Inner Mongolia territory belongs to Chinese.

    • @markocroatia7630
      @markocroatia7630 3 роки тому +2

      @@yeshiyangzom8532 Which Chinese federal state (Inner Monglia is a federal state or autonomy province but which dinasty)? Which Chinese dinasty historically rule under Inner Mongolia and from which city? Are they declare as Mongol or Chinese?

    • @yeshiyangzom8532
      @yeshiyangzom8532 3 роки тому +4

      Marko Croatia There is a mountain called “Yinshan” in Inner Mongolia, which is the real boarder between China and normad dynasty. You can still see the older Great Wall there.

    • @VicmundLim
      @VicmundLim 3 роки тому +4

      @@limhock604 don't forget about India. Where majority are illegitimate spawns of Persian, Greeks, Arabs and Brits

  • @pl510_
    @pl510_ 2 місяці тому

    There is a story passed down in my culture that back in the day we were forced out of our region in china. I believe that it might’ve have been khan or a descendent of khan

  • @iskambillordu
    @iskambillordu 3 роки тому +3

    How mongol empire builded:
    Mongol: we going to raid wes-
    Turk: im in before u say it
    - Mongol empire established -

  • @meghna6223
    @meghna6223 3 роки тому +1

    Nice Video ^_^

  • @messier8379
    @messier8379 3 роки тому +8

    Mongols invasion of Jin and Song is like the Eastern Version of Arab invasion of war torn Sassanid and Byzantium

    • @williamrobert9898
      @williamrobert9898 2 роки тому

      Idk about that tbh

    • @messier8379
      @messier8379 2 роки тому +1

      @@williamrobert9898 Jin and Song Dynasties were in War for Centuries.....both Dynasties can't cooperate when the Mongols Invaded..
      The Mongols promised Song Alliance in exchange of helping attacking Jin..
      But 40 years later the Mongols Still invaded Song .also Song Military are very Neglected by their Emperor

  • @cianmannion1752
    @cianmannion1752 3 роки тому

    Im early yay love the videos and the lore learn more than i ever did in school

  • @BritskNguyen
    @BritskNguyen 3 роки тому +3

    Q in chinese pinyin is not pronounced /k/ . Its closer to ch in english word "church". So Qin dynasty is pronounced like Chin, not Kin

    • @scintillam_dei
      @scintillam_dei 3 роки тому

      Pinyin is dumb, or whatever that system is.

    • @BritskNguyen
      @BritskNguyen 3 роки тому

      @@scintillam_dei agree. Cant be helped because China gonna chine, potato gotta potate

    • @svdvan8797
      @svdvan8797 Рік тому

      Qin is not easy to pronounce for whoese mother language is English.

  • @Saleemtruth
    @Saleemtruth 2 роки тому +1

    No mention of many details. Though Mongols brought all China under one control, which would be very useful for coming Chinese Dynasties. Same as Mughals have done in India, a near relatives of Mongols. Babar the founder of Mughal empire was direct descendent of Genghis Khan, numerous spelling of his name, western and Muslims , since they became Muslims, so spelling of name.
    The original story told & read of Mongols first penetration into China was very superhuman. The Mongols use to ride for 6 hours form their camping area to China , where they would shut gates of fortress on early warning system.
    It was estimated that Mongols who ride horses bear, meaning without any seat or other cushioning material. The Chinese has estimated that it would take in such condition of riding Mongols 6 hours to come to gates of fortress.
    The Mongols then did extra human fleet, they rode to their camps and return immediately back, thus riding continuously for 12 hours, and they took China with complete surprise .
    In all history, except for post modern, where fire power is winning factor, in past it was often poor, tough people , who organised and became much feared invaders as Mongols and Mughals & other numerous horseback militia did as Golden Hordes etc. The Crimean much feared Muslim Turk militia, which kept Crimean a vessel state of Ottoman Empire.
    .

  • @vibarva
    @vibarva 3 роки тому +16

    Meanwhile Russia started growing at the mongols’expense

    • @NyangisKhan
      @NyangisKhan 3 роки тому +1

      Muscovy using loan sharking tactics to unite Russia is one of the most underrated feats in history tbh.

    • @giles4565
      @giles4565 3 роки тому +2

      Exactly, mogols did not stand a chance against European heavy calvelry. They did not even have knowledge of iron working.

    • @tuguldursooyo4685
      @tuguldursooyo4685 3 роки тому +3

      @@giles4565 Facts say otherwise,
      Mongols had Lamellar armor which is iron working.
      battle of Legnica and Mohi proved Templar Knights, Teutonic Order and Hungarian heavy cavalry a failure against Mongols.
      Death of Ogedei Khan saved Central Europe.
      Subutai steamrolled Teutons in their steel heavy armor lol
      Subutai freaking used Gunpowder weapons against the Europeans at Mohi ffs.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mohi
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Legnica

    • @sansan2591
      @sansan2591 3 роки тому +4

      @@giles4565 hahahaha what ? read some history broo Mongols literally butcherd Poles and Hungarians.

    • @PrabirKrPal
      @PrabirKrPal 3 роки тому

      @@giles4565 Please learn history. Mongols butchered the combined armies of Rus principalities of Russia at the Battle of Kalka River even though the mongols were outnumbered three to one.
      They also massacred Poland's army at the Battle of Legnica. After the battle they captured and killed Henry The Pious (leader of the polish army) and displayed his severed head on a spike in the town of Legnica.
      They also destroyed the Hungarian Army at the Battle Of Mohi. And massacred more than 500,000 of Hungary's civilian population, after King Bella fled.

  • @Opmium
    @Opmium 11 місяців тому +1

    Mongol was a great lesson that unification and unity among states could gain you support and freedom

    • @amaerukaoru
      @amaerukaoru 8 місяців тому

      But a funny thing is that, after mongols conquered China, they ruled Chinese in an inadvertent way, which provided more freedom than a despotism in many Chinese dynasties 🤣🤣🤣
      In Song dynasty's China, the status of women were much lower than Mongolian society...
      In Ming and Qing dynastie, people were not entitled to criticize the authority, but people could do this in Mongol's Yuan dynasty 😂

    • @神可汗
      @神可汗 5 місяців тому

      @@amaerukaoru Because the Mongolian royal family basically did not know how to govern an empire, they had never had the experience of ruling such a large country and people. Therefore, the Yuan Dynasty was essentially governed by the Han elites. The Mongolian royal family only needs to collect taxes on time. The Han officials who govern the country don't care what you say

  • @armchairwarrior963
    @armchairwarrior963 3 роки тому +4

    China had better tech, but Mongols had better warriors and strategy.

    • @观点反方
      @观点反方 3 роки тому +7

      @Cengez han actually, it was richest dynasty of China.it was also golden age for tech, like gunpowder,printing.Song dynasty fall because of corruption

    • @Clee-os6pv
      @Clee-os6pv 3 роки тому +1

      +@Cengez han :
      Are you for real? Pretty sure Gunpowder, Compass, Printing Press, and Paper. The 4 great inventions came from China.

  • @benlam496
    @benlam496 2 роки тому +2

    Song emperors were all stupid except the founder and first 2 generations. Son Gaozong had a chance to restore the Song Empire and make it the most powerful song empire under his reign, because he had legendary Yue Fei as his military commander.
    But then he is just a coward, scared that rescueing his daddy in Kaifeng city would mean the end of his reign. So after a victorious war by yue Fei he orders yue Fei to retreat. And made terms with enemy to negotiate peace by killing yue Fei.
    He could have just pushed on the conquest, rescue his father( make his dad the imperial father) have title but no political power.
    Emperor Gaozong of song could have wiped out Jin, then when Genghis comes, it would be 100k troops vs 1M+. Very difficult to fight.

    • @kihuu4055
      @kihuu4055 2 роки тому

      I like song empire

  • @Godsmith_YT2998
    @Godsmith_YT2998 3 роки тому +3

    Love you from india 🇮🇳

  • @zoranznidaric4518
    @zoranznidaric4518 2 роки тому +1

    China had an emperor that didn't give a shit for ordinary peasants. That is why Mongols were able to get upper hand.

  • @lt419
    @lt419 3 роки тому +3

    The secrets of only thousands of Mongolian nomads conquering country of millions such as China is in their nourishing good diet- meat and milk, which gave them good stamina, plus the harsh step climate coupled with extensive physical labour, such as horse riding since childhood.

  • @Papa_jon.geopolitik
    @Papa_jon.geopolitik Рік тому

    How about liao? Dynasty? U didnt mention liao ?

    • @ro0ster648
      @ro0ster648 5 місяців тому

      at this time period, Liao don't exist no more

  • @joshua_here5849
    @joshua_here5849 3 роки тому +7

    How Chinese cover Mongols conquering them
    "Mongols were Chinese"

    • @指鹿为马-s1h
      @指鹿为马-s1h 3 роки тому

      The Ming Empire destroyed the Mongolian Empire (Yuan Dynasty)

    • @joshua_here5849
      @joshua_here5849 3 роки тому +1

      @@指鹿为马-s1h so?

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому +1

      they don’t cover

    • @joshua_here5849
      @joshua_here5849 3 роки тому +1

      @@mint8648 there's a whole Inner Mongolia that China captured from Mongolia, also CCP claims Mongols are Chinese

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому

      @@joshua_here5849 they say mongols are one of 50 something ethnic groups of china

  • @LakshmiPraveenDiaries
    @LakshmiPraveenDiaries 3 роки тому +2

    Sir, would you like to make video on Achaemenid Empire series after this Mongols Empire series, please Its my huge request...

    • @babak-shah5005
      @babak-shah5005 3 роки тому +1

      Hello sir, are you Indian? I wonder why you are so interested in the Acheamenid? Peace from Iran.

    • @LakshmiPraveenDiaries
      @LakshmiPraveenDiaries 3 роки тому +1

      @@babak-shah5005 Because I love Cyrus II and Darius I, Achaemenid Empire is one of the Greatest Empire all time, My favourite Ancient city was Persepolis which was build by non slave. because as you see the Cyrus cylinder which consider as first Human rights, they are done many beautiful projects like Royal road, second Jewish temple, Canal of the Pharaohs (Suez Canal) and many more..., its an Diversed Empire with Multicultures and with Multiple peoples. I love Achaemenids!!!

    • @LakshmiPraveenDiaries
      @LakshmiPraveenDiaries 3 роки тому

      @@babak-shah5005 Yes, I am Indian. you?

    • @babak-shah5005
      @babak-shah5005 3 роки тому +1

      @@LakshmiPraveenDiaries wow thats very nice that you know so much about my beautyfull country and history. I am from Iran sir. I want to visit the ruins of Persepolis. Since when are you intrested in Iran or Iran's history and how did that start? I am curious to know. Much respect

    • @LakshmiPraveenDiaries
      @LakshmiPraveenDiaries 3 роки тому +1

      @@babak-shah5005 When I was research Great Empires and Cultures, Only Achaemenid Empire has Infuenced me. because you people have Greatest and Successful Administration and Religions.

  • @In_Our_Timeline
    @In_Our_Timeline 3 роки тому +5

    Land:exist
    Mongols: you know the rules and so do i

    • @scintillam_dei
      @scintillam_dei 3 роки тому +1

      Water: Exit:
      Mongols: WAAA! MOMMY! I DON'T WANT TO TAKE A BATH!

  • @obiwankenobi5769
    @obiwankenobi5769 3 роки тому +2

    Remember to visit Mongolia before Mongolia visits YOU

  • @dragosstanciu9866
    @dragosstanciu9866 3 роки тому +12

    China has learned the lessons of history, keeping China strong and united is the top priority today.

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 роки тому +11

      @Free Speech cringe

    • @scintillam_dei
      @scintillam_dei 3 роки тому +1

      United under Satan the dragon isn't the answer.

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 3 роки тому +4

      The territories they consider Chinese and in need of being "united" is questionable. Today it is just used as a tool for aggression and expansion.

    • @dragosstanciu9866
      @dragosstanciu9866 3 роки тому +1

      @@googane7755 Exactly.

    • @beautifullife1881
      @beautifullife1881 2 роки тому

      Still PRC Vs ROC . And Chinese go around to provoke other countries. They have not learned much.

  • @ericwong4213
    @ericwong4213 5 місяців тому

    Kubilai was surprised as over than 60,000 Chinese Han actually joined his conquest to Southern Song. When Mongol occupied Song, the Han people celebrated it as they were subjected to heavy taxes and tortures from corrupt Song kingdom. Enriched by culture, wealth, and hardworking quality people, Kubilai declared himself as the Khan of Mongol and Emperor of China. Something that no other Mongol leader would do, as it mean the Khan has the same title as Emperor of China.
    Similar with the Mongol, when Manchuria conquered China, the Chinese welcomed them due to suffering under Ming corruptions. The Manchu Emperor Kanghsi declared every provinces leaders to host grand feast, combining culinary of Han chinese and Manchu. Years later, the Manchu Emperor at peak of Manchuria golden age, Xianlong declared himself as reincarnation of Liubang, the Emperor of Han dynasty. As he heavily fell in love with Chinese culture, he announced to his close ministers that he often dreamed of Guangong (Chinese general turned into deity) came to protect him. He then promised to uphold his mission and brought China to be superpower of Asia, which he did as his conquest including part of modern Russia, present Mongolia republic, entire Korean peninsula, northern vietnam, and further west including part of kazhakstan.

  • @cs_fl5048
    @cs_fl5048 3 роки тому +5

    I think this bit of history is, as you say, quite simplified, but ok. The bigger lack, maybe covered elsewhere? is that you didn't explain how the Mongols, also a collection of various tribal groups, were unified in the first place. They had been suppressed by the various Chinese dynasties for a few hundred years before they were able to effectively unite. This might be a good story as well. Further, how the FALL of this empire happened is another good story.

    • @protestantwarrior1516
      @protestantwarrior1516 3 роки тому

      Chinese never surppressed the Mongols. The Chinese paid tributes to Mongols and their predessors for centuries.

    • @QWERTY-gp8fd
      @QWERTY-gp8fd 3 роки тому +3

      @@protestantwarrior1516 nope they suppressed mongols. ambaghai khan was purged by jin.

    • @protestantwarrior1516
      @protestantwarrior1516 3 роки тому

      @@QWERTY-gp8fd jurchens are not chinese. China was invaded by them.

    • @ruiwang8024
      @ruiwang8024 3 роки тому

      @@protestantwarrior1516 Apparently the North Song dynasty was the dynasty in which China started pay tributes to Mongols and it in total lasted only two centuries.

    • @小鱼王-x4n
      @小鱼王-x4n 2 роки тому +2

      @@protestantwarrior1516 The Qing Dynasty established by the Jurchen is the first country in Chinese history to call itself China. Historically speaking, the country name of China came from the Qing Dynasty, and modern China continues to use this country name, so the Jurchen is of course Chinese.

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 3 роки тому +1

    division weakens a nation
    unity strengthens a nation.

  • @SzHo-lz1rl
    @SzHo-lz1rl 8 місяців тому +3

    The Chinese are undoubtedly the strongest in the world when it comes to resisting the Mongols.

    • @SimakSantana
      @SimakSantana 7 місяців тому

      china fell. countries like veitnam and japan actually resisted

    • @426mak
      @426mak 5 місяців тому +4

      @@SimakSantana True but they were facing a very different Mongol Empire, weakened by decades of being softened by 'civilsation', while China resisted a Mongol Empire at its military peak under legends like Subutai.

  • @anuragtumane5227
    @anuragtumane5227 Рік тому +1

    Mongols conquering China resulted in some historic implications there.

  • @cookieblue7797
    @cookieblue7797 3 роки тому +10

    Mongols never fully conquered China, Yuan dynasty only had 89 years, (1271 to 1368), and the Chinese never gave up fight back. Ming dynasty quickly beat up Mongolians and took over.

    • @protestantwarrior1516
      @protestantwarrior1516 3 роки тому +5

      If that's true, why did Ming dynasty emperor was kidnapped by Mongols during Tumu crisis.

    • @fromfareast3070
      @fromfareast3070 3 роки тому +6

      @@protestantwarrior1516 Because it was different emperor and age ,duh!

    • @protestantwarrior1516
      @protestantwarrior1516 3 роки тому +4

      ​@@fromfareast3070 Research Temu incident, and see how Ming dynasty failed with their border policies with Mongols.

    • @ruiwang8024
      @ruiwang8024 3 роки тому +7

      @@protestantwarrior1516 Every Chinese knows Tumu incident. But if you take it as a proof of the Mongol's complete conquest to China then it's weird. Also, the emperor that was kidnapped during Tumu is an emperor ranked last 3 (not official, but by history amateurs) and he was kidnapped due to his own incompetence. It was true that the Ming dynasty did not completely defeat Mongolians, but it was also the fact that Ming dynasty kicked Mongolians out of land of Chinese.

    • @brittney0516
      @brittney0516 2 роки тому +1

      Still 89 years they lost their empire by Mongols, oh, don't forget Qing dynasty after that 😅

  • @tzl1117
    @tzl1117 Рік тому +1

    Another observation is rarely any Chinese think Jin or Liao is China, but thinks Mongolian’s Yuan is. The fact is culturally and ethnically Jin and Liao is much more China than Yuan.

    • @Justspinwin
      @Justspinwin 5 місяців тому

      Then u don't understand China at all. The Liao and Jin never conquered Song so many Chinese wouldn't consider them as a rightful ruler of middle kingdom. Yuan conquered Song and started the Yuan dynasty using Chinese system Writing and so on makes Yuan the successor of Song.

    • @神可汗
      @神可汗 5 місяців тому

      You are not a Chinese who grew up in China, right? Most Chinese people agree that Liao and Jin are part of Chinese history.

  • @animewatch4213
    @animewatch4213 3 роки тому +9

    Chinese learn a major lesson after this. No more small kingdoms fighting among themselves. Unify together or get conquered by a strong outside force. In WWII, the nationalist (Taiwan today) and Communist work together right away when Japan invaded even though they are super bitter enemies.

    • @michaelk4896
      @michaelk4896 3 роки тому +5

      "Working together" may be a bit of a stretch seeing how the communists (indirectly) benefited from the Japanese incursion, as the bulk of the fighting was done by the nationalists (+ Japanese materiel seized by the communists/Soviets in northern China at the end of the 2nd Sino-Japanese War; the communist forces did not receive German/US/Soviet materiel support or training like the KMT did).
      Frankly, Chinese republicanism (whether nationalist or communist) greatly benefited from Japanese aggression since the late 19th c. as the Qing dynasty lost its legitimacy to rule ("Mandate of Heaven"), stoking the fire of a republican revolution which eventually occurred in 1911. Heck, even Sun Yat-Sen was living in Japan in exile.
      Was there a Chinese "united front" formed in the face of Japanese aggression? Sure, but mostly on paper. Chiang Kai Shek had to be coerced into halting aggression against communist forces.

    • @TheJadedSkeptic
      @TheJadedSkeptic 3 роки тому +1

      Only front the Communist really fought at the time was the back side of the Nationalists. True traitors of the era.

    • @神可汗
      @神可汗 5 місяців тому

      @@TheJadedSkeptic The ruling party is not doing its job, so it blames the opposition for not protecting the country.

  • @therenomoregoodnames
    @therenomoregoodnames 3 роки тому +1

    Next video should be about an island nation for #TeamSeas

  • @Guardias
    @Guardias 3 роки тому +3

    No mention of the siege technology they imported from Europe? The siege tach that allowed them to conquer the most heavily fortified Song Strongholds?

    • @scintillam_dei
      @scintillam_dei 3 роки тому

      What exactly?

    • @zainmudassir2964
      @zainmudassir2964 3 роки тому +7

      A lot came from conquered Muslim territories especially Iraq

    • @bayanbatu6848
      @bayanbatu6848 3 роки тому

      @@scintillam_dei Borrowed trebuchets from kingdom of Antioch

    • @PrabirKrPal
      @PrabirKrPal 3 роки тому +1

      No! They already had siege engines and gunpowder weaponry after they sacked Beijing.

    • @jannusetan8306
      @jannusetan8306 2 роки тому

      They get from Jin dynasty cannon and grenade

  • @kkgc5760
    @kkgc5760 3 роки тому +1

    7:45 i read that in Oogway's voice lol

  • @leeben7605
    @leeben7605 3 роки тому +8

    蒙哥died in battle of dianyucheng nowadays sichuan. Thats triggered fall of Mongol empire. If 蒙哥 didnt die, Europe will be swiped away.

    • @jamesray1439
      @jamesray1439 3 роки тому

      Well that didn’t happen but European colonialism of China happened for several hundreds of years.

    • @DucaTech
      @DucaTech 2 роки тому

      @@jamesray1439 They did? How come the Chinese are not speaking English like other colonies?

    • @jamesray1439
      @jamesray1439 2 роки тому

      @@DucaTech are you drugs? Hong Kong until the 90’s was European colony, Taiwan is still ostensibly a colony. And there is no lack of English speakers in China.

    • @svdvan8797
      @svdvan8797 Рік тому

      ​@@jamesray1439 China not speak English bro😂, can you tell me anywhere in this world that there's no people can speak English?

    • @svdvan8797
      @svdvan8797 Рік тому

      Diaoyucheng not dianyucheng. My home town, toasted fish is famous, welcome to travel.

  • @Leonewn
    @Leonewn 3 місяці тому

    In fact, every dynasty in China has repaired the Great Wall and sent troops to confront northern nomadic tribes, which lasted for thousands of years. Until the Song Dynasty saw a turning point, allowing Mongolia to unify the grasslands and become a powerful warlord spanning across Europe and Asia. At that time, the Song Dynasty accumulated thousands of years of money and technology, which were used by the Mongols to conquer the continent, which is ironic.

  • @michaelflores6445
    @michaelflores6445 3 роки тому +7

    We can't blame China why they hate most other countries nowadays. They went through a lot in the past though

    • @ezwan7656
      @ezwan7656 3 роки тому

      China also destroy a lot of countries and people. Original china wasnt that big. Even southern china wasnt originally chinese. Search bai yue people.

    • @lx6461
      @lx6461 Рік тому

      It's America made other countries people hate China, not Chinese hate other countries

  • @eltonbritt1502
    @eltonbritt1502 Рік тому +1

    States then can field hundreds of thousands of soldiers because of mandatory conscription and abject poverty. People were so poor that being in the army meant eating at least twice or thrice a day; so it doesn't take much coaxing to enlist men into the army. Although irregular, soldiers were also paid meager salaries and a share in the spoils.

  • @rayleighs2840
    @rayleighs2840 3 роки тому +2

    Mongol, Western Liao and Jin Dynasty were derived from Liao Dynasty. In general Chinese history, nowadays, the Mongol's re-unification of China was regarded as the civil war of China, the later established Yuan Dynasty still using chinese empirical system by succeeding Western Liao, Jin, Western Xia and Song dynasty, chinese language was still the official language, Yuan Dynasty is an important chinese Dynasty, she made an excellent combination of chinese culture and normadic culture, importantlly, for the first time, Tibet was united into China. Based on the unification model established by Yuan Dynasty, in later 700 years, the Great China system (大中华体系) was continued in Ming Dynasty, Qing Dynasty, Republic of China and today's People's Republic of China.

    • @Gasolonfreestyle
      @Gasolonfreestyle 3 роки тому +2

      Beg to differ. What you stated is the official propaganda to consolidate the current multi ethnic country which mainly composed of Han ethnicity at the population of 92% or higher. But actually the notion of China in history was more cultural rather than geographical, referring to the adherence of Confucianism and sinicization. The so called “Yuan” dynasty or the mongols is a humiliation of Chinese history since it was fully conquered by an alien force that discarded Confucianism and Chinese language, while imposed a hierarchical society that placed Han people at the very bottom

    • @rayleighs2840
      @rayleighs2840 3 роки тому

      I guess you may not chinese, cannot totally understand Chinese 's mentalities for unification (culturally and more), if you have time, staying and living in China for 3 years, then come back to tell me your feeling. It is the time for our 5000 years China teaching the world in the next decades. Please just wait and see.

    • @Gasolonfreestyle
      @Gasolonfreestyle 3 роки тому +1

      @UC7B_y-cMhnHgWPcZoCMsCqQ the point I’m making is not to argue if western countries have biased views or try to provoke racial tensions in China. This is a way more complicated issue, if you take geo-political factors, partisanship and media propaganda into account. Rather, my point is, the notion of current China “中国” is actually proposed by 孙中山 after the collapse of Qing Dynasty. Before that, it is an academic consensus that China (in this case 华夏/中原) was a cultural norm to those who endorsed Confucianism and Chinese values. So arguably, Qing Dynasty, which also ruled by an ethnic minority group, is generally considered an integral part of Chinese history because of the sinicization process. Yet by any criteria, Yuan’s history was a humiliation in Chinese history, as Confucianism as well as traditional Chinese values and customs were not preserved during that era. I agree with you that the Opium War and the following 100 years have been a humiliation to Chinese history, but that doesn’t qualify Yuan to be a legit Chinese Dynasty

    • @rayleighs2840
      @rayleighs2840 3 роки тому

      @@Gasolonfreestyle In the future, China will making expansion and take back outer Mongolia and more of our lost lands, so it is not very important to emphasis the intra-chinese dynasties' difference. Hopefully you can understanding my meaning.準備中華文明的復興和擴張 😄😉 Sui-Tang-(Song-Liao-Jin-Mongol)Yuan-Ming-Qing-ROC-PRC-Big China. The real humiliation is the Anglo-Saxons and Japanese invasion, We should never forget, one day we will let them pay for the debts.

    • @Gasolonfreestyle
      @Gasolonfreestyle 3 роки тому +1

      @@rayleighs2840 when reviewing historical issues and discourses, we cannot use our current values and ideologies to judge upon wha happened in the past, that’s what most historians, including Chinese teachers would tell their students. From our current point of view, Yuan and the so called inner dynasties are Chinese domestic issues, as propagated by Chinese textbook and media, but assume China lost the second Sino-Japan War (1937-1945), the “successful” Japanese invasion would be considered “inner dynasties” in the mindset of people like you in the future, right? I’m a Chinese who was born in China and had been in the states for more than 10 years. Chinese domestic nationalism has somehow developed into a far right situation and I do hope it would not degrade into nazism and therefore cause World War III