SCOTUS Restores the 7th Amendment Right to a Jury Trial
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
- SEC v. Jarkesy is one of the biggest SCOTUS cases of this term. The Wall Street Journal called it "a blow to regulators that could have ripple effects across the U.S. government." This decision revives one of the most important liberty protections in the Bill of Rights: the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. Its logic applies to all federal agency proceedings, not just those at the SEC. The opinion is a historic declaration of independence from decades of encroachments by the Administrative State.
What will you learn from watching the discussion?
The legal strategy that led to the victory. NCLA has supported Mr. Jarkesy’s cause and collaborated with his counsel for many years. Others told them that a Seventh Amendment argument stood no chance. Nevertheless, they prevailed.
How the logic of the decision applies to other federal agency proceedings, not just those at the SEC.
How Jarkesy meshes with other recent SCOTUS rulings to curtail the runaway Administrative State-Relentless, Corner Post, and others.
Moderator:
NCLA President Mark Chenoweth
Panelists:
Peggy Little, NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel
Richard Samp, Seasoned constitutional appellate litigator and member of the NCLA Board of Advisors
Michael Showalter, Special Counsel, Wiley Rein
The right to a full jury trial never ended. It was abused and violated by bureaucracies at all levels of government for all sorts of excuses, and it still is. If anything, this decision was not general enough in its recognition that we are always entitled to a full jury trial any time the government wishes to take property, money, freedom, or lives. This is so even for seemingly minor offenses such as traffic tickets, and esoteric cases such as involuntary commitment. Without a full jury trial, there is too much opportunity for corruption to rule our courts at the expense of defendants.
When was it not in place? WTF!
No you don't know the 14th amendment and then saying they can change our birthright status to nothing more than a person born property of the government create the second class citizen. Americans are not federal class citizens are not supposed to be. Nothing that creates a second-class of citizenship is unconstitutional get in against a fundamental freedoms. But they did it anyways. Limiting us to whatever they feel like our constitution in the 10th and the Bill of Rights. According to them by the definition of a national born citizen. Which is. A person born property of the government. Can you tell me the difference between a person born property of the government and a person born property of the slave owner? It's the slave owners name! That's what's the difference is.
It was repealed? Who knew?
More clap trap from Leo's Federalist Society and the Koch brothers.
Judge still has discretion to block evidence
The higher Judges have told the lower Judges that they cannot use "contempt" to punish litigants who offend them. It seems that they are "Holier than thou", without need of the "Rule of Law". Local, Regional, State and National Judges must not imprison citizens without due process, within a trial, and a Jury of one's peers.
Yeah they don't want they tested in the court of law
Well most people don't understand or even comprehend the difference between public and private sectors.
Yep I wanted the jury trial and I was denied it
Yes and the government never had more power than any one of our states are states existed before the federal government
But we do have a right to legal binding contract it's called the consent of the governed you ever heard of the declaration of Independence.
Citizens of the states and citizens of the United States which would be citizens of the US Federal are two different citizenship classes under the 14th amendment..
We're not obligated though we're not supposed to be obligated to enter into a contract agreement with the government consensual agreement what's the legal binding contract with the government once you turn of age after you've learned what you need to learn to be able to consensually consent to one or not if you don't want to you don't have to. According to them somehow they can have our parents sign our freedom away even though they have no right to our individual freedoms only ourselves do
All gun laws are unconstitutional therefore illegal in violation of.
1.) the supremacy clause.
2.) article 4 section 2 paragraph 1.
The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.
3.) second amendment SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED clause.
4.)9th amendment enumeration clause.
5.)10th amendment nor prohibited by it to the states clause.
6.)14th amendment section 1
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause.
Congress, the justice department (courts),law enforcement have been operating illegally unconstitutionally for the past 100 years.
We have a natural right freedom of movement freedom to be able to move throughout any one of our states did to pursue our happiness as we see fit play some freaking literally infringing on our pursuit of happiness 100 on American
Yeah they're supposed to respect the Constitution and not try to interpret it because it's already been interpreted by the people that created it and the people back then and how they understand it is the exact same standing it has today there is no interpreting the Constitution
Yeah they're supposed to respect the Constitution and not try to interpret it because it's already been interpreted by the people that created it and the people back then and how they understand it is the exact same standing it has today there is no interpreting the Constitution