شكرا على هذا الفيديو الرائغ - كثير ما يحصل لي بعض التعقيدات في الدفاع الصقلي ولكن بعد هذا الفيديوا اعتقد ان كثير من مشاكلي قد وجدت لها الحلول الرائعه - Thank you for this excellent video - often gets me some of the complications in the Sicilian defense, but after this section I think that a lot of my problems have found wonderful solutions
Nice video, but strange that you discuss this as if this is unusual. The night maneuvers are very standard against this line and were not started by Kasparov. I'm just a 2000 player but have employed this often.
Nice video. Thanks for sharing. If I may suggest here; the Najdorf 6.Be3 line is just so large that maybe you could another part to it. Perhaps a plan where White short castles or does not castle at all. Just a suggestion. Again, great great video and I think you have done an excellent job on it, just asking for part 2.
Great video>> Please try not to analyze so fast.... e6 that Kasparov played is not so unusual, i would say that it is more common than e5. I would also prefer that you note a little bit more the opening moves and not move so quickly.. Thanks for the videos
bobby and kasparov never faced each other, but it would have been the hottest game of all times. But both the legends were extremely similar in their playing style n openings. The mystery of who would have won remains a mystery.
good to hear you are winning games with the Najdorf! i´d be glad to offer you a 50% off coupon for my DVDs on the Najdorf and Endgames - shoot me a personal message if you´re interested. Cheers, Will
@@thenpguy5852 Nfd7 can't go as the other knight is occupying that square. This entire opening seems dubious One needs to look at time 3:27. Note ichess.net did not reply. Stockfish shows -1.5 after the knight is pushed to the rim.
Kasparov's games are really too advanced and complex for most people. If you want to improve study players with clearer more classical styles, people like Capablanca, Fischer and Karpov.
No, Karpov is known for clarity and simplicity. He's a disciple of Capablanca. It is Kasparov who is known for complexity. Kasparov is a student of Alekhine who was interested in venturing into the unknown.
Karpov is very strong and plays in a profound way, but his play is still conservative, non-sacrificial. In general players agree that complications or complex play is associated with gambits and sacrificial attacks. These are found in Tal, and Alekhine, two of the main players Kasparov studied.
Mr. Punisher - thanks for checking us out and glad to hear yo like our videos. i´d be happy to offer you a 50% off discount for all digital items in our online shop. just send me a personal message and i´ll get back to you with the coupon code. Thanks again, Will
Hi Zach, the series is an in depth look at the Sicilian Najdorf, focusing particularly on the contributions made by Kasparov and Fischer and how they used the Sicilian Najdorf to their advantage in some of their most famous games.
Oh, great. Another mad zealot of the deranged Fischer. While he may have had chances against Karpov (not particularly high as Karpov rose further in the chess world), Kasparov and especially Magnus would have run circles around that madman.
Thanks for the feedback! I´ll keep that in mind for the future. Cheers, Will
awesome series. i know alot about the sicilian now and have been VERY succesful with it in some of my blitz games. thanks will!
Brilliant analysis, Will. This series is really instructive and you've selected a wonderful set of games to illustrate your point!
Thanks! 🤓
Thanks for watching - glad you found these videos helpful!
thanks Ryan - I think in a few months I´m going to produce a similar series on the King´s Indian Defense
Excellent analysis Mr Ryan I am like kasprov queenside attack by knight thanks Mr ryan
Thanks! I really like Kasparov's queenside play with that e6 system. Cheers, Will
Thank you for explaining each move patiently sir
You're welcome! :)
Excellent analysis. Thank you for sharing. We want more !
شكرا على هذا الفيديو الرائغ - كثير ما يحصل لي بعض التعقيدات في الدفاع الصقلي ولكن بعد هذا الفيديوا اعتقد ان كثير من مشاكلي قد وجدت لها الحلول الرائعه - Thank you for this excellent video - often gets me some of the complications in the Sicilian defense, but after this section I think that a lot of my problems have found wonderful solutions
الدفاع الصقلي hhhhh
My compliments for this good video though! Its very clear and not too deep into theoretical knowledge. Thanks for these vids
Nice video, but strange that you discuss this as if this is unusual. The night maneuvers are very standard against this line and were not started by Kasparov. I'm just a 2000 player but have employed this often.
Nice video. Thanks for sharing. If I may suggest here; the Najdorf 6.Be3 line is just so large that maybe you could another part to it. Perhaps a plan where White short castles or does not castle at all. Just a suggestion. Again, great great video and I think you have done an excellent job on it, just asking for part 2.
Peter Bodziony Thanks for your support. We'll consider your suggestions.
Thank you for the commentary. Title is wrong: it is Polgar, not Fischer. I too would like you to slow down on the opening, to allow us to digest it.
Those knight moves by black are crazy scary looking. great vid.
Great video>> Please try not to analyze so fast.... e6 that Kasparov played is not so unusual, i would say that it is more common than e5. I would also prefer that you note a little bit more the opening moves and not move so quickly.. Thanks for the videos
What if white plays g5 instead of Qd2 in the Polgar-game, kicking the knight?
Stockfish shows knight goes to the rim and is down -1.5, so it is a very good question.
awesome video, I liked
great analys
English attack is even very dangerous against scheveningen, althouth it is not mentioned in kasparov's book on scheveningen.
great clip!!
bobby and kasparov never faced each other, but it would have been the hottest game of all times. But both the legends were extremely similar in their playing style n openings. The mystery of who would have won remains a mystery.
+Tushar Dhore Yes, It would've been an amazing game!
nice explanation
good to hear you are winning games with the Najdorf! i´d be glad to offer you a 50% off coupon for my DVDs on the Najdorf and Endgames - shoot me a personal message if you´re interested. Cheers, Will
Instead of Qd2 what if white plays g5 attacking knight on f6???
Time stamp?
iChess.net 3:23 (the highlighted pawn) when kasparov played Nbd7 white played Qd2...Instead of Qd2 what if white pushed that pawn highlighted before
The knight can move to h5 for now, and the game is still pretty equal.
What if after Nbd7 white plays g5 right away. Then Nh5 and then f4. Doesn't look very good to me
tell me the exact min and i'll help you better :)
+iChess.net 3:12 , after Nbd7 , white can play g5 then what should black do
maybe think for yourself. Nfd7 obviously!
@@thenpguy5852 Nfd7 can't go as the other knight is occupying that square. This entire opening seems dubious One needs to look at time 3:27. Note ichess.net did not reply. Stockfish shows -1.5 after the knight is pushed to the rim.
Kasparov's games are really too advanced and complex for most people. If you want to improve study players with clearer more classical styles, people like Capablanca, Fischer and Karpov.
Daniel Gontar interesting point of view!
Daniel Gontar Karpov's style of play is much more complicated
No, Karpov is known for clarity and simplicity. He's a disciple of Capablanca. It is Kasparov who is known for complexity. Kasparov is a student of Alekhine who was interested in venturing into the unknown.
Daniel Gontar karpov plays prophylactic and thats so complicated
Karpov is very strong and plays in a profound way, but his play is still conservative, non-sacrificial. In general players agree that complications or complex play is associated with gambits and sacrificial attacks. These are found in Tal, and Alekhine, two of the main players Kasparov studied.
Mr. Punisher - thanks for checking us out and glad to hear yo like our videos. i´d be happy to offer you a 50% off discount for all digital items in our online shop. just send me a personal message and i´ll get back to you with the coupon code. Thanks again, Will
Ha I didn’t know they had clickbait 10 years ago
that would be cool beans
This is a fake Kasparov never played fisher
Hi Zach, the series is an in depth look at the Sicilian Najdorf, focusing particularly on the contributions made by Kasparov and Fischer and how they used the Sicilian Najdorf to their advantage in some of their most famous games.
i thought you were talking about booby fischer ? that guycan beat kasparov +magnus+kaprov
Oh, great. Another mad zealot of the deranged Fischer. While he may have had chances against Karpov (not particularly high as Karpov rose further in the chess world), Kasparov and especially Magnus would have run circles around that madman.
kasparov!
hi kasparov
anti sicilian