Promotion policies concerning Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in India have been a subject of significant legal and constitutional development. Here’s a concise overview: Constitutional Provisions 1. Article 16(4): Enables the state to make provisions for reservation in appointments or posts for backward classes not adequately represented in public services. 2. Article 16(4A): Added via the 77th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1995, this allows the state to provide reservations in promotion for SCs and STs in public employment, considering their inadequate representation. 3. Article 16(4B): Ensures that the unfilled reserved vacancies are carried forward to subsequent years without affecting the ceiling of 50% reservation. Landmark Judicial Pronouncements 1. Indra Sawhney Case (1992): The Supreme Court ruled that reservations in promotions are not permissible under Article 16(4). This led to the 77th Amendment. 2. Nagaraj Case (2006): Upheld the constitutional validity of Article 16(4A) but introduced conditions: The state must demonstrate backwardness, inadequate representation, and administrative efficiency. Reservations should not breach the "ceiling limit" or "creamy layer" criteria. 3. Jarnail Singh Case (2018): Modified the Nagaraj judgment by removing the requirement to prove backwardness of SCs/STs, emphasizing their inherent disadvantage. Current Issues 1. Adequate Representation: States must gather quantifiable data to prove underrepresentation of SCs/STs. 2. Efficiency: Critics argue that reservations in promotions may compromise administrative efficiency, as highlighted in Article 335. 3. Creamy Layer Debate: Whether the creamy layer principle should apply to SCs/STs is still debated. Conclusion While the promotion policies for SCs/STs aim to ensure social justice and equal representation, they must balance these goals with constitutional principles like administrative efficiency and equality.
@@mayursadh2345 mai vo hu jo tum log bnne ki koshish krre 😂😂 khud ko rajput btake hmari or bezatti krate ye lodhdè. Jbse net free hua hai hr nich jaati ko apne baap bdlne hai
आशुतोष जी ने क्या कैरेक्टर पकड़ा है एकदम फिट और यकायक ही ऐसे किरदार करेंगे कि डर से रोंगटे खड़े हो जाये 👌👌
This type of character is what required to excel in govt organisation
Jativad desh ki barabadi hai
*और आरक्षण* 🤔🤔
Jativada ka wajah politics he
Jo Khatam nhi ho sakta
Yaha jatina par nokari scholarship or
True reservation in promotion should be removed
Promotion v jaat par 😂😂
It’s very normal in govt sector, in police ST/SC gets promoted quickly compared to general.
@@Mr_R.a.w.a.t aiyen baigan 😂 lmao majority wahan general lekin promotion sc st ka ho rha hain bc konse dimension se ho rawat...
@@Mr_R.a.w.a.tky ans kiye sir 😂❤
Netis ji jindabad Jai Shree Ram
Vinay Pathak and।Ashutosh ..both hv nice craft
Is movie ka naam kya hai please movie name bataye
Khakhee Bihar Chapter
Promotion policies concerning Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in India have been a subject of significant legal and constitutional development. Here’s a concise overview:
Constitutional Provisions
1. Article 16(4): Enables the state to make provisions for reservation in appointments or posts for backward classes not adequately represented in public services.
2. Article 16(4A): Added via the 77th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1995, this allows the state to provide reservations in promotion for SCs and STs in public employment, considering their inadequate representation.
3. Article 16(4B): Ensures that the unfilled reserved vacancies are carried forward to subsequent years without affecting the ceiling of 50% reservation.
Landmark Judicial Pronouncements
1. Indra Sawhney Case (1992): The Supreme Court ruled that reservations in promotions are not permissible under Article 16(4). This led to the 77th Amendment.
2. Nagaraj Case (2006): Upheld the constitutional validity of Article 16(4A) but introduced conditions:
The state must demonstrate backwardness, inadequate representation, and administrative efficiency.
Reservations should not breach the "ceiling limit" or "creamy layer" criteria.
3. Jarnail Singh Case (2018): Modified the Nagaraj judgment by removing the requirement to prove backwardness of SCs/STs, emphasizing their inherent disadvantage.
Current Issues
1. Adequate Representation: States must gather quantifiable data to prove underrepresentation of SCs/STs.
2. Efficiency: Critics argue that reservations in promotions may compromise administrative efficiency, as highlighted in Article 335.
3. Creamy Layer Debate: Whether the creamy layer principle should apply to SCs/STs is still debated.
Conclusion
While the promotion policies for SCs/STs aim to ensure social justice and equal representation, they must balance these goals with constitutional principles like administrative efficiency and equality.
Kaun jaat hai😂😂😂😂😂😂
Jai Brahman Jai Parshuram
बिहार पुलिस के इतिहास में सबसे करप्ट , नेता का चापलूस ऑफिसर ( गुप्तेश्वर पांडेय ) रणवीर सेना का एजेंट
💯% sahi bole
Yaha bhi jaat😂
Desh ka haal.. unpadh gawar ko sir bolna padta h IPS ko.. desh ka haal.. we need immediate change
Can anyone tell me movie name
Khaki
Someswa chotta hai😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 thanks per gher Jana hai 4 sall fir see ajjo ga
Name kya hai
Ips grand entry
Bas isi vajah se to aaj Bihar barbad hai
कौन जात है?
जाती है कि जाती ही नहीं
Duniya bhi tu dekhini hai or gher bhi jana jaruri ha 4 sall
जातिवाद
लोधा क्षत्रिय जाती है❤
😂😂 abe obc
tu kya h
tujhe kya problem h
Yahi jaati waad toh khatam karna ha desh se kshatriya sirf ranbhumi main ha . Ab woh koi bhe ho .
@@mayursadh2345 mai vo hu jo tum log bnne ki koshish krre 😂😂 khud ko rajput btake hmari or bezatti krate ye lodhdè. Jbse net free hua hai hr nich jaati ko apne baap bdlne hai
Movie bame
web series Khaki the Bihar chapter
Lodha ❤
मूवी का नाम बताओ यार भाई प्लीज
Webseries -: khakee the Bihar chapter
Yadav ko bus pandit se badal dia
Hahaaa pandit ji...
@@BabluYadav-dq7ex bhai ye yadav community par nahi chara chor Lalu parshad par sattire tha mera