Laurence Tribe: The Trump immunity case will ‘hurt the Supreme Court even more than Bush v. Gore’

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 кві 2024
  • Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker is back on the stand in Manhattan. This comes after the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on former President Donald Trump's immunity claim. Laurence Tribe and Joyce Vance join Andrea Mitchell to weigh in on Pecker’s testimony and the pending ruling from the Supreme Court.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
    Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/dow...
    Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
    MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
    ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
    MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
    Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
    #SCOTUS #supremecourt #immunity

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @darrylgoldsmith7107
    @darrylgoldsmith7107 12 днів тому +100

    SCOTUS has lost all credibility…

    • @petert3355
      @petert3355 11 днів тому +5

      They lost that months ago when they made women second class citizens.

    • @herballycorrect
      @herballycorrect 10 днів тому

      Even after weaponizing the federal government and attacking him with the DOJ, the FBI, crooked prosecutors, crooked judges, and the liberal media Trump's still beating the bark off of Biden in every poll. That's how badly Biden sucks! FJB

    • @brian-us6vw
      @brian-us6vw 10 днів тому

      Lost all credibility because of your unconstitutional opinion? Tell me you are not a traitor without telling me you are a traitor XD

    • @neal5068
      @neal5068 10 днів тому

      No it hasn't, it's just not joining the political persecution of Trump

    • @neal5068
      @neal5068 10 днів тому

      ​@petert3355 how did they do that?

  • @kimmyk1
    @kimmyk1 12 днів тому +153

    Supreme Court needs to stop all the bs on trump

    • @TwinGoats
      @TwinGoats 12 днів тому +5

      What bs

    • @lesliezammit3456
      @lesliezammit3456 12 днів тому

      Better still the American People need to stop those on the SC who have failed to honor their Oaths of office.

    • @bobquattrini1787
      @bobquattrini1787 12 днів тому +2

      😆

    • @wandaenman5630
      @wandaenman5630 12 днів тому +16

      They won't, they can't, he appointed three them with a clear quid pro quo. This was the plan from day one.

    • @simonpkiss1035
      @simonpkiss1035 12 днів тому +1

      Trump's lawyer is fooling around with regards to Trump plead for immunity.

  • @rexodeuce5035
    @rexodeuce5035 12 днів тому +119

    Let's be clear here...
    SCOTUS has already ruined their reputation.

    • @rebeccadavis794
      @rebeccadavis794 12 днів тому +8

      💯

    • @markdegloria4038
      @markdegloria4038 12 днів тому +1

      Because you didn't get your way 😭 what a little baby 🍼 keep the rabid DEI hires though of course.

    • @Jessecraft1954
      @Jessecraft1954 12 днів тому +5

      I've lost respect for them.

    • @keithosmond5730
      @keithosmond5730 12 днів тому

      @@markdegloria4038 Because they are putting their politics ahead of - or even in place of - the law, and rewriting the constitution on the fly.
      You're good with the clear, overt politicization of SCOTUS?

    • @markdegloria4038
      @markdegloria4038 12 днів тому

      @@Jessecraft1954 they are better than you. Even the one that doesn't know what on earth a woman is 🤣

  • @raistlinrodriguez5696
    @raistlinrodriguez5696 12 днів тому +53

    Unless they change the Constitution, the Supreme Court doesn't care about their reputation. Lifetime appointments need to be removed and these Justices need to be able to be held accountable for their corruption. The people in this country don't care about what the court does because it doesn't affect them until it does. No job in government should be a lifetime appointment, especially in the judicial system.

  • @eternalskeptic
    @eternalskeptic 12 днів тому +42

    The $upremely Corrupt Court.

  • @je8784
    @je8784 12 днів тому +59

    WE THE PEOPLE HAVE LOST FAITH IN THE SUPREME COURT'S ABILITY TO MAKE GOOD DECISIONS.

    • @Ohreallybro95
      @Ohreallybro95 12 днів тому +1

      Cry me a river

    • @davidwelsh8026
      @davidwelsh8026 12 днів тому +1

      What people ?

    • @neal5068
      @neal5068 10 днів тому +1

      No we haven't

    • @CherCherico
      @CherCherico 3 дні тому

      We the people? About 70 millions of us disagree with your diatribe. You want to charge President Trump for documents and not charge Biden. But the Supreme Court is the problem? Look in the mirror.

  • @Mr__Geno
    @Mr__Geno 12 днів тому +167

    The minute any SC Justice said they didn't want to look at any facts, the prosecutor should have told the Judge he needs to step down, rightfully so.

    • @hadtocheathimtobeathim6549
      @hadtocheathimtobeathim6549 12 днів тому

      The facts of Trumps cases aren’t what they’re debating here. And at no time did any justice say they didn’t want to look at any facts. Your TDS is on violist couding your hearing as well as your processing.

    • @user-oc2qk3er5r
      @user-oc2qk3er5r 12 днів тому +1

      yeah im sure he would just listen to the prosecutor and call her a day........grow up

    • @ronaldking1054
      @ronaldking1054 12 днів тому +10

      @@bike4jesus The Supreme Court Justices did not want to hear the exact facts of the case for this particular immunity claim. A narrow ruling would need these facts, but for some reason, they didn't want them.

    • @bike4jesus
      @bike4jesus 12 днів тому +1

      @@ronaldking1054 it wasn't a trial. It's about immunity. Facts against Trump don't matter because it's about immunity as president.

    • @ronaldking1054
      @ronaldking1054 12 днів тому +1

      @@bike4jesus It's an appeal on a motion to dismiss, and as such, yes, it is part of a trial. The Supreme Court has very limited options in terms of hypotheticals, and that is if the injury is imminent. There is no imminent injury to future Presidents unless you want to claim that Trump being elected is potentially bad for Biden because he wants to get revenge. Otherwise, SCOTUS should be doing what it legally must and handling the current motions on dismissal for the current indictments. Georgia and the Washington, D.C. indictments would be the only thing of matter because the Florida case is for his retaining documents during the obstruction of litigation on the classified documents, which happened after his Presidency.

  • @pintogallo
    @pintogallo 12 днів тому +61

    Corruption and incompetence without accountability is dangerous, a spoiled brat getting his way

  • @soniastuart9476
    @soniastuart9476 12 днів тому +141

    Get rid of Clarence Thomas😊

    • @davidcribbs2
      @davidcribbs2 12 днів тому +22

      And Alito. And Gorsuch.

    • @TikTuirey
      @TikTuirey 12 днів тому +1

      Back to his rootsafrica

    • @Foolish188
      @Foolish188 12 днів тому +2

      Time and junk food will do it.

    • @madeintexas1213
      @madeintexas1213 12 днів тому

      Of course you want to remove a black man from the Supreme Court? Racist. Because he won’t do what you want he’s no good? Hmmm

    • @OSnoopySnoop1
      @OSnoopySnoop1 12 днів тому +4

      NO,MASSA SAID THAT HE'S A GOOD "BOY"😅😂

  • @antiquemechanic1
    @antiquemechanic1 12 днів тому +190

    Justice delayed is justice denied.

    • @nascarnut18
      @nascarnut18 12 днів тому +3

      Indeed, this ruling from the Supreme Court is justice, 2 years delayed. We'll take it, though! Have fun gnashing your teeth over this!

    • @roadwarrior6039
      @roadwarrior6039 12 днів тому +4

      Cry cry cry 😢😢😂

    • @hiltonwatkins6750
      @hiltonwatkins6750 12 днів тому +1

      @@nascarnut18
      I wonder how many germans who supported Hitler died before his final suicide…. Just something to think about for those voters who want a violent solution for America.

    • @Gglsucksbigballz
      @Gglsucksbigballz 12 днів тому

      Why?

    • @maysville3815
      @maysville3815 12 днів тому +4

      @@roadwarrior6039 Every democracy in history has been tested. This is just the current freak. Or should I ask how the weather is in Polyarny, comrade?

  • @cyrilmocine6452
    @cyrilmocine6452 12 днів тому +102

    We have a major problem with the Scotus. Who thinks this can continue without reform? This needs to be urgently addressed.

    • @kevinambrow7688
      @kevinambrow7688 12 днів тому +7

      No reform needed. The Constitution stands.

    • @nascarnut18
      @nascarnut18 12 днів тому

      "Reform" - Democrat speak for "This didn't go in my favor, so it must be destroyed"
      You people are so fascistic and toddler-like at the same time.

    • @Huntinghogs
      @Huntinghogs 12 днів тому +1

      Why, because they don’t rule lock step with your agenda, comrade?

    • @im2tweaked
      @im2tweaked 12 днів тому

      OP let me make sure i understand your comment fully..... "SCOTUS is following the laws and i dont like it so they need to change"...... did i miss anything?

    • @Cornpop-N-DaBoyz
      @Cornpop-N-DaBoyz 12 днів тому +3

      Because they follow the constitution and won't help prosecute your political opponents. Waa😢

  • @cherylbarrett3443
    @cherylbarrett3443 12 днів тому +292

    I was very unimpressed with the Justices who cut off any discussion of the facts of the case. They did not even want information about Trump's crimes to be spoken out loud. There is a total lack of a moral compass on the Roberts court, and a clear disrespect for the law and the Constitution.

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 12 днів тому +5

      @@wethepeople720 Morals on the Supreme Court.

    • @spiceyhotpot
      @spiceyhotpot 12 днів тому

      SCOTUS was there to delay it, and to offer some cover for the Dump, not have an actual finding of facts which don't exist in this case.

    • @bobcob3362
      @bobcob3362 12 днів тому +7

      You tube lawyers are funny

    • @mydrouno
      @mydrouno 12 днів тому +27

      I was appalled after listening to it. In 44 years, I've never felt true hopelessness until now. They were supposed to be the last line of defense, and they are compromised.

    • @jnagarya519
      @jnagarya519 12 днів тому

      The spirit of arrogant right-wing crank Scalia hovers over this Court.
      They are "originalists" and "textualists" except when they aren't. They elevate "states' rights" above the SUPREME law Constitution -- except when that is contrary to their political goals.

  • @seth8629
    @seth8629 12 днів тому +189

    I'm amazed how little they care about their reputation

    • @paulkern7229
      @paulkern7229 12 днів тому +27

      Why should they care? They've got lifetime appointments and no ethics rules to worry about.
      Our system is broken, perhaps irreparably.

    • @erock736
      @erock736 12 днів тому +14

      Money talks

    • @annettes7460
      @annettes7460 12 днів тому +14

      Who thinks that the SC cares about their reputation? They answer to no one.

    • @Dingleberry777
      @Dingleberry777 12 днів тому +4

      Who MSDNC ?

    • @robyoung-pl1gq
      @robyoung-pl1gq 12 днів тому +6

      they're employed for life

  • @funkymonkey65
    @funkymonkey65 12 днів тому +86

    In a world of deceipt telling the truth is a revolutionary act!!

    • @TwinGoats
      @TwinGoats 12 днів тому +2

      This place never tells the truth

    • @M1ster.Fr3sh
      @M1ster.Fr3sh 12 днів тому +2

      Thank you Orwell!

    • @markbauer909westend
      @markbauer909westend 12 днів тому +2

      Deceit

    • @CherCherico
      @CherCherico 3 дні тому

      Like Biden saying we have the best economy in the last 60 years? That his son died in Afghanistan in combat. His uncle was eaten by cannibals? He attended a black church?

  • @paulgoudfrooij6561
    @paulgoudfrooij6561 12 днів тому +26

    But how will this hurt the Supreme Court, really? They will happily remain in office, not caring at all what we think about them.

    • @dlewis895
      @dlewis895 12 днів тому +1

      IMPEACH. TRAITORS. IN THE SUPREME COURT TX ABBOTT REFUSED TO OBEY SC ABOUT WIRES IN THE BORDER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CAN ALSO CHOSE TO REFUSE THE DISHONORABLE INJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT

    • @michaelhuppertz6738
      @michaelhuppertz6738 12 днів тому +4

      The Supreme Court has no inherent power, its power derives from the fact that the other branches of government pass laws and execute laws and these are accepted by the people. With the gradual loss of the court's reputation, some Republican states are already refusing to implement Supreme Court rulings, see recent decisions on violation of the Voting Rights Act. Republican legislatures have refused to implement the court's decisions against stategic gerrymandering which has resulted in disenfranchisement of minority voters.

    • @paulgoudfrooij6561
      @paulgoudfrooij6561 12 днів тому

      @@michaelhuppertz6738 well if someone defies Supreme Court precedent, they can be sued. But their power is to make decisions on issues that aren’t written in stone in the constitution and brought up to their level.

    • @michaelhuppertz6738
      @michaelhuppertz6738 12 днів тому +1

      @@paulgoudfrooij6561 We see in realtime the erosion of judicial and legislative system in the US and starts with the SC. Suing is actually only an option, but the legislator ignored the SC rulings two times.

    • @kikitoo9374
      @kikitoo9374 12 днів тому +3

      Even tho we already knew about Thomas crimes, the beginning of the downhill slide, when the states defied SCOTUS, it still felt shocking. Now it's shocking that they're openly partisan and actually thinking of giving the gd traitor what he wants.
      Alito & Thomas want to retire. The only way to assure 2 new conservative judges are put in to replace them... IS by helping the traitor win. 😮😢

  • @user-ec9sj6ku5m
    @user-ec9sj6ku5m 12 днів тому +30

    I’ve lost faith in the court

    • @madeintexas1213
      @madeintexas1213 12 днів тому

      First time being here? You just have never been in any court in your life I assume 😂

    • @nancydouglas8772
      @nancydouglas8772 10 днів тому

      I think scotus has lost millions of people's faith especially since the Trump appointees.

  • @peterjeffery8495
    @peterjeffery8495 12 днів тому +332

    Anything but a 9-0 repudiation of Trump's Immunity claim will be a disgrace to this court beyond measure.

    • @DarthSailorMoo
      @DarthSailorMoo 12 днів тому

      It's Trump's Supreme Court. They don't care about America's constitution.

    • @DrakeSmith-tn6ij
      @DrakeSmith-tn6ij 12 днів тому +18

      What’s wrong with putting a criminal like Trump in prison?

    • @DarthSailorMoo
      @DarthSailorMoo 12 днів тому +4

      @@vertigohayes5001 I have been getting tired of seeing Trump constantly lose his court cases.

    • @user-ei8do4uq4j
      @user-ei8do4uq4j 12 днів тому +1

      There is always someone who loses in a court decision. Someone will cry, but the other will smile.

    • @eb1247
      @eb1247 12 днів тому +21

      unless guess what..the charges are bogus...

  • @juanitasilva4220
    @juanitasilva4220 12 днів тому +134

    Having judges that were appointed by the defendant is an injustice to America.

    • @renerodriguez2134
      @renerodriguez2134 12 днів тому +2

      Definitely

    • @teresalegler2777
      @teresalegler2777 12 днів тому +3

      All three plus Clarence Thomas should recuse themselves. But that’s not going to happen.

    • @bobevans9955
      @bobevans9955 12 днів тому +6

      You're okay with the ones Obama appointed though aren't you

    • @BHShaman
      @BHShaman 12 днів тому +7

      @@bobevans9955 None of the other Justices were appointed by an individual ever brought to Criminal Court.

    • @jamesrandolph6021
      @jamesrandolph6021 12 днів тому

      ​@@bobevans9955yes

  • @user-cv8hj2cs9f
    @user-cv8hj2cs9f 12 днів тому +58

    The fact that the SC even took this case has already hurt it's reputation further.

    • @HeywoodJablowme-ro5ut
      @HeywoodJablowme-ro5ut 12 днів тому

      So you're putting yourself above the Supreme Court. The audacity of your arrogance is astounding!

    • @michaelhuppertz6738
      @michaelhuppertz6738 12 днів тому

      Because of impeachment rules, lack of oversight by the Supreme Court chief justice and no enforceable code of ethics, right wing judges can do what they want. Neither lying under oath, years of bribery or spousal interference in the presidency led to consequences.

  • @arussellhart
    @arussellhart 12 днів тому +87

    The Supreme Court is a subsidiary of the Federalist Society. Thomas can look forward to more luxury vacations.

    • @bambiclark8861
      @bambiclark8861 12 днів тому

      Not if we vote Biden into the 2024 presidency and Biden taxes the wealthy their 20% as Biden said he would do.

    • @wesleywashington1251
      @wesleywashington1251 12 днів тому +1

      Yep. Great to see an informed person in the comments

    • @edblasingame8139
      @edblasingame8139 12 днів тому

      What a FOOL BELIEVES!!!

  • @chuckhall5347
    @chuckhall5347 12 днів тому +80

    This case is on the level with Dred Scott and Plessy v Ferguson. It shows the Supreme court is captive of right wing special interest.

    • @nonya.bizness
      @nonya.bizness 12 днів тому +6

      that's exactly what i came here to say.

    • @JohnPublic-dk7zd
      @JohnPublic-dk7zd 12 днів тому

      No, but it is amazing this exact topic has never come up before...leave it to the communist democrats to force the issue, and cry when it doesn't go their way...

    • @awtodor
      @awtodor 12 днів тому +8

      In my opinion also Citizens United. In fact it's very likely given the gifts to the justice Citizen United directly has led to this speculative questioning.

    • @MikeLee-df5gc
      @MikeLee-df5gc 4 дні тому

      Chuck, I thought we were past that. I guess not. This SC has been compromised. The fact that they have lifetime appointments is so outdated.

  • @onequestion2059
    @onequestion2059 12 днів тому +8

    I suggest 10 justices at all times, 5 Republicans and 5 Democrats, with a term limit of 4 years. Let's see if that focuses them on the law instead of politics!

  • @adrianjameSASbury
    @adrianjameSASbury 12 днів тому +54

    Scotus needs a full audit by all security agencies, find out who is pulling their strings.

    • @DalhiaSun
      @DalhiaSun 12 днів тому +1

      The Federalist Society who else?!

  • @michaelreid7469
    @michaelreid7469 12 днів тому +68

    No president or men are immune from the USA justice system 😢

    • @chrishagreen3988
      @chrishagreen3988 12 днів тому +4

      Wanna bet?

    • @kevinambrow7688
      @kevinambrow7688 12 днів тому +2

      Neither is Biden.

    • @RespekfulFungus
      @RespekfulFungus 12 днів тому

      So when are we charging Obama with murder? Biden of aiding and abetting illegal immigration? Clinton for lying under oath. They aren’t saying total immunity, think for yourself and actually look at the law. If he were successfully impeached, then he could be charged. That’s why impeachment exists.

    • @cindypyle7047
      @cindypyle7047 12 днів тому +3

      That is what we thought

    • @Foolish188
      @Foolish188 12 днів тому

      ​@@kevinambrow7688Duh, only Trump and his goons believe in unlimited Presidential power. Biden can't even take the action he wants on the border because Republicans have refused to let him.

  • @ngcastronerd4791
    @ngcastronerd4791 12 днів тому +32

    I think Clarence Thomas ruined the supreme courts image all by himself!

    • @sherrillthomas7645
      @sherrillthomas7645 12 днів тому +1

      Racist!

    • @ngcastronerd4791
      @ngcastronerd4791 12 днів тому +2

      @@sherrillthomas7645 why bring skin color into this? Who's being racist?

    • @catbranchman01
      @catbranchman01 12 днів тому +3

      @@ngcastronerd4791it’s not just Clarence Thomas though. It’s Alito. In fact, in today’s hearing, Alito said the worst things

    • @SocialismSucks
      @SocialismSucks 12 днів тому

      Ukraine bot🐑

    • @ngcastronerd4791
      @ngcastronerd4791 12 днів тому

      @@SocialismSucks Ad hominem.

  • @paulinelobbestael3206
    @paulinelobbestael3206 12 днів тому +49

    Go out and vote 💙 We need to preserve our Democracy!!

  • @melodylovesepe
    @melodylovesepe 12 днів тому +11

    What a joke!

  • @andresmiguelcervantes4818
    @andresmiguelcervantes4818 12 днів тому +51

    Who would have thought that our SCOTUS would be so lawless?

    • @generalputnam2990
      @generalputnam2990 12 днів тому +4

      Tdfg - who appointed three of them

    • @LydiaStarz
      @LydiaStarz 12 днів тому +4

      I had a bad feeling about Gorsuch and Barret...now I know why.

    • @HeywoodJablowme-ro5ut
      @HeywoodJablowme-ro5ut 12 днів тому

      So you're putting yourself above the Supreme Court. The audacity of your arrogance is astounding!

    • @anthonyrussell4888
      @anthonyrussell4888 12 днів тому

      😂 You're joking, right?

    • @Gglsucksbigballz
      @Gglsucksbigballz 12 днів тому

      Democrats seem more like a cult than A party these days.

  • @programmerdave9893
    @programmerdave9893 12 днів тому +13

    What does it matter if it hurts the Supreme Court’s reputation? It’s not like we can vote them out, and it’s not like Congress will pass any constitutional amendments to overturn any SCOTUS decision. They can be universally hated, but it doesn’t matter. Their reputation is effectively meaningless.

    • @greenbrain8725
      @greenbrain8725 12 днів тому

      I think members of SC can be impeached.. if the House flips, and it might soon.

  • @m.d.grimes1622
    @m.d.grimes1622 12 днів тому +52

    We need to impeach at least 2, probably 3 of the justices on the Supreme Court.

    • @glennabaugh856
      @glennabaugh856 12 днів тому +4

      They lied under oath, you try that see what happens.

    • @goettling
      @goettling 12 днів тому +1

      And who has the authority to do that? Just want to know.

    • @johnnyfreedom3437
      @johnnyfreedom3437 12 днів тому

      Justice Thomas And Justice Alito accept money from billionaires having business before the court on a regular basis! But don't forget about the three justices Trump placed that lied under oath to get their jobs for the sole purpose of taking the abortion right from women! That's five justices that need replacement!!

    • @kac2868
      @kac2868 12 днів тому

      NO! ALL 6 "CONSERVATIVE" Judges Have to be "IMPEACHED" and "REMOVED" IMMEDIATELY!!! To say "ANYONE" has "IMMUNITY" from Prosecution is TOTALLY ABSURD and should NEVER have been heard!!!!

    • @Ohreallybro95
      @Ohreallybro95 12 днів тому

      That’s facism

  • @seymourbutts4654
    @seymourbutts4654 12 днів тому +160

    The justices on our court have accepted gifts from people who had or will have cases before them. They idea they're being impartial is a sick joke.

    • @BlakeLyon-xw7of
      @BlakeLyon-xw7of 12 днів тому

      And the daughter of the judge in Trumps criminal case, has clients that have made millions off the prosecution of Trump. He didn't step down.

    • @iGoldenWax
      @iGoldenWax 12 днів тому

      Joe Biden took money from China, does you logic still apply? Or is your preferred party excused?

    • @anacorreia8058
      @anacorreia8058 12 днів тому

      No they just don’t support Communist insurgents, sweetie

    • @davidwelsh8026
      @davidwelsh8026 12 днів тому

      Did you see the gifts ?

    • @louiseporter8148
      @louiseporter8148 11 днів тому

      ​@@davidwelsh8026Oh please. Get your head out of maga disinformation sites. We know about Thomas ill gotten gains on the other side of the world. Your supreme court is of the most corrupt in any western nation. All republicans of course.

  • @jeffbecker5148
    @jeffbecker5148 12 днів тому +123

    Vote Blue, expand the Supreme Court, and impeach Thomas.

    • @user-gd7ho3yv4s
      @user-gd7ho3yv4s 12 днів тому +6

      Great option!

    • @Blacks4trump2024
      @Blacks4trump2024 12 днів тому +14

      Ok fascist

    • @winstonsmith6607
      @winstonsmith6607 12 днів тому

      Vote for theSenile warmonger who thinks his uncle was eaten byCannibals? Are you nutz?!

    • @jeffbecker5148
      @jeffbecker5148 12 днів тому +1

      @@Blacks4trump2024 , you can't even correctly define "Fascism." You have no clue, troll. Now go cry elsewhere, Skippy.

    • @jeffbecker5148
      @jeffbecker5148 12 днів тому +10

      @@Blacks4trump2024 , you can't even correctly define "Fascist." You speak words you know nothing of.

  • @dvhughesdesign
    @dvhughesdesign 12 днів тому +17

    Gee... I wonder if the SC will wait until the end of the term to decide? What a mystery!!!!

  • @lancejordan2561
    @lancejordan2561 12 днів тому +22

    Most of SCOTUS is quite comfy and secure in their judicial bed of corruption.

    • @SEPTEMBERMAN
      @SEPTEMBERMAN 12 днів тому

      As are the Democrats.

    • @goettling
      @goettling 12 днів тому

      You betya!

    • @MikeLee-df5gc
      @MikeLee-df5gc 4 дні тому

      Septemberman, the justices that have clogged this trial are not the Dems. They were paid for by the Republicans.

  • @paulwashington8938
    @paulwashington8938 12 днів тому +5

    You know that they won't act quickly. They are who we think they are.

  • @onequestion2059
    @onequestion2059 12 днів тому +5

    They can't even decide that any Presidential candidate should not also be an insurrectionist and think they are writing law for the ages. They seem foolish at best.

    • @nancydouglas8772
      @nancydouglas8772 10 днів тому

      It's disgraceful

    • @CherCherico
      @CherCherico 3 дні тому

      What? Trump was an insurrectionist against himself. Imagine how foolish these "insurrectionists" were they went to an insurrection and brought only their cell phones? Just because you sit in front of the TV and hear the Media types plant this nonsense in your head doesn't mean you have to repeat it.

  • @charliebrown1828
    @charliebrown1828 12 днів тому +18

    Corrupt

  • @cindypyle7047
    @cindypyle7047 12 днів тому +18

    They need to replace this Supreme Court. They have forgotten what justice is.

    • @peterdarr383
      @peterdarr383 11 днів тому

      They get replaced when they die - - that's Justice.
      Or do you want Biden to pick 9 new Judges ??

  • @johntuel2375
    @johntuel2375 12 днів тому +10

    They have already totally tarnished their reputation

  • @stevenf7683
    @stevenf7683 12 днів тому +3

    They are hoping that they can delay this until after the election so they will never have to make a decision.

  • @AndyM_323YYY
    @AndyM_323YYY 12 днів тому +8

    I am confident their various "close personal friends" will be satisfied with the pantomime being played out by the puppets in SCOTUS.

  • @jb4688
    @jb4688 12 днів тому +24

    SCOTUS should be abolished, there is no accountability and since it picks and chooses the cases that it hears it proves to be a non-essential entity!

    • @guapochico69
      @guapochico69 12 днів тому

      And completely unelected with lifetime appointments and compete authority to repeal any progressive legislation it doesn't like

  • @575HI
    @575HI 12 днів тому +5

    GUILTY!!!!!

  • @edwardyang9377
    @edwardyang9377 12 днів тому +27

    Don't let him play around with laws.

  • @patsysouthern5245
    @patsysouthern5245 12 днів тому +3

    I would like to know. can a supreme court justice be inpeached. Thanks.

  • @barbellebracht7553
    @barbellebracht7553 12 днів тому +12

    Joyce Vance is so wise and measured in her responses. Love seeing her on your show!

  • @lauragroce3816
    @lauragroce3816 12 днів тому +2

    Why is this even an issue with SCOTUS? No one is a love the law. Period

  • @user-mo4od9zt9h
    @user-mo4od9zt9h 12 днів тому +3

    FJB
    !!!!

  • @Kentavious444
    @Kentavious444 12 днів тому +3

    Why would they care about reputation. They answer to NO ONE!!

  • @brendajones8251
    @brendajones8251 12 днів тому +21

    Trump won't need the Supreme Court if reelected he'll abolished this branch.

    • @JohnPublic-dk7zd
      @JohnPublic-dk7zd 12 днів тому

      Lol, take a deep breathe...! this exact topic has never come up before, and the justices would like to get it right...I predict some immunity will be the verdict, about 8-1...if no immunity, Carter, Bush, and Obama better lawyer up, they have blood on their hands, too...this ain't solely about DJT, it is about the office, and the president (any party), needs to have flexibility...

    • @fredbowerman1683
      @fredbowerman1683 12 днів тому

      That's an extremely bumb statement 😅😅😅

    • @DoSe420
      @DoSe420 12 днів тому

      Quit projecting. Packing the court and destroying the system, is what democrats want because they can't get their way

    • @fallonclouatre7934
      @fallonclouatre7934 12 днів тому

      I believe this is true. Why would Trump want oversight? If SCOTUS rules in his favor, he will destroy the Constitution and abolish them. After all he will have immunity😂

    • @tubefreeeasy
      @tubefreeeasy 12 днів тому

      Why would he?
      He’s got them in his pocket.

  • @ronabitz5156
    @ronabitz5156 12 днів тому +4

    One of the mosr disturbing things a Justice said yesterday was when he question the legitimaticy og Grand Juries. If the Justices do not think Hrand Juries are legitimate then what does that say about the state of the justice system?

    • @archieclement2977
      @archieclement2977 12 днів тому

      Prosecutors manipulate grand juries. That's something that adults understand.

  • @fjai2755
    @fjai2755 12 днів тому +54

    We need to vote Blue for all offices. If the supreme Court is compromised, then it's time to strip back their power.

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 12 днів тому +4

      13 justices.

    • @DoncasterLass
      @DoncasterLass 12 днів тому

      They won't exist if Trump gets back into office, as he will give the President total authority of the country.

    • @trumpisgoingtoprison177
      @trumpisgoingtoprison177 12 днів тому +2

      @@mile_high_topherexactly

    • @jamesswain2465
      @jamesswain2465 12 днів тому

      Law and order, don't change a thing.

    • @kmick8108
      @kmick8108 12 днів тому +1

      @Jamesswain move to Russia

  • @sherlockhomo-ph4su
    @sherlockhomo-ph4su 12 днів тому +46

    Clarence Thomas is someone who annoys me.

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 12 днів тому

      Clarence Thomas is someone who takes bribes.

    • @rebeccadavis794
      @rebeccadavis794 12 днів тому +3

      And rubs it on our faces.

    • @wesleywashington1251
      @wesleywashington1251 12 днів тому

      At least these right wing billionaires don't mind sharing their wealth with someone who isn't white. Obviously they don't need a token black man.

  • @instrumental5763
    @instrumental5763 12 днів тому +6

    They are gangsters

    • @unbehagen686
      @unbehagen686 12 днів тому

      Russian Mafia Gangsters/Russian Assets

  • @kento4177
    @kento4177 12 днів тому +18

    SCOTUS is paying us no mind.

  • @ngkahn7496
    @ngkahn7496 12 днів тому +3

    The amicus brief needs to be amended to include this:
    Pose a more extreme version of the SEAL Team 6 hypothetical to SCOTUS we heard in the Court of Appeals, where a judge asked if Trump’s theory would absolve him if he used the military to take out political opponents. Take it a step further and tell the Court that if Trump has the immunity he claims he does, a president would be free to order the assassination of Supreme Court Justices who disagree with him, and could not be prosecuted for doing that.
    Make the impact of Trump’s argument unmistakable. Let the examples of conduct that would be permissible under Trump’s view of immunity drive home how essential it is for the Court to reject his appeal and send this case back on its way to trial.
    No president and no one is above the law.
    Source: Article written by Joyce Vance

    • @unbehagen686
      @unbehagen686 12 днів тому

      Thank you!! And Thank you, Joyce Vance of Alabama!! I had not thought passed neutralizing Trump, but Right On!! Neutralized Trump Supremes goes hand in hand. Excellent thinking!!
      🇺🇸👍
      Hopefully Trump Court tells President Biden when to call Seal Team Six to save The United States Constitution, The United States Constitutional Republic and Many Law-abiding American Lives from Trump's promised Retribution Dictatorship BEFORE November 5 2024 potus election!
      🇺🇸⚖️🇺🇸

    • @nancydouglas8772
      @nancydouglas8772 10 днів тому +1

      Absolutely

  • @jamesgreenler8225
    @jamesgreenler8225 12 днів тому +22

    They should tell Trump that his new prison cell is 3x larger than it really is .

  • @nicasio1979
    @nicasio1979 12 днів тому +13

    No one is above the law don’t apply in the Supreme Court.

    • @JohnPublic-dk7zd
      @JohnPublic-dk7zd 12 днів тому +1

      This is about the law...not who is/isn't above it...

    • @nicasio1979
      @nicasio1979 12 днів тому +1

      @@JohnPublic-dk7zd absolute immunity is above the law.

    • @unbehagen686
      @unbehagen686 12 днів тому

      Any potus immunity is above the law.

  • @truthvsopinion
    @truthvsopinion 12 днів тому +9

    "How can we serve you, master?"
    "So look, all I wanna do is this...just find me 11,780 reasons to DELAY."

  • @CandyAppleBlack
    @CandyAppleBlack 12 днів тому +3

    the court isnt very supreme..doesnt even come with sour cream

  • @floydhutcherson1732
    @floydhutcherson1732 12 днів тому +3

    But..what about MY feelings!?

  • @virginiagrundman4012
    @virginiagrundman4012 12 днів тому +1

    The mere fact they heard it is astounding. I'm thoroughly ashamed of them.

  • @rhyslucero1400
    @rhyslucero1400 12 днів тому +12

    Tribe: Not only do criminals need be held accountable, misbehaving Courts and prosecutors must also be held accountable. And defendants that are improperly charged must be protected. The Supreme Court is not a criminal court, they are there to illucidate our Rights under the Constitution.

    • @silverman5707
      @silverman5707 12 днів тому +3

      Whose job is it to see that happens?

    • @guapochico69
      @guapochico69 12 днів тому

      Ope what do you know they just discovered that we all have no more rights and america was supposed to be a whites only Christian theocracy. Guess if they are our illucidators

  • @TheMamonti1
    @TheMamonti1 12 днів тому +18

    Seal Team ready Joe?

    • @JohnPublic-dk7zd
      @JohnPublic-dk7zd 12 днів тому

      Careful what you wish for...

    • @BHShaman
      @BHShaman 12 днів тому +1

      @@JohnPublic-dk7zd What would be the downside? Trump would get to test his theory, albeit in a position different than he imaged, and potentially Nikki Haley is elected?

    • @JohnPublic-dk7zd
      @JohnPublic-dk7zd 12 днів тому

      @@BHShaman and where does it end...? Nikki would be executed at the end of her term, the next person would be executed, and the person after that...Carter, Bush, Obama, put them up against the wall tomorrow, why wait...?

    • @TheMamonti1
      @TheMamonti1 12 днів тому +2

      @@JohnPublic-dk7zd the court isn't ruling on my wish... that they even are hearing insanity... is my nightmare!

    • @JohnPublic-dk7zd
      @JohnPublic-dk7zd 12 днів тому

      @@TheMamonti1 insanity...?? what insanity...? and a court is supposed to hear the arguments, not rush into summary judgement...you are skirting around the issue...

  • @mydrouno
    @mydrouno 12 днів тому +14

    How will this hurt the court when they will see zero consequences? Isn't it a lifetime appointment?

    • @unicorn73212
      @unicorn73212 12 днів тому

      Watch and find out this is new stuff we are learning they say you can't get your sources from the media but you can because they generally report what's actually going on with the government they would probably be fired if they published a false report.

    • @karennoble3795
      @karennoble3795 12 днів тому

      Yes. You are right. These pea brains here are hysterical. LOL

    • @ARichardP
      @ARichardP 12 днів тому +1

      Public trust. Public confidence.

    • @Rockinandwatchin
      @Rockinandwatchin 10 днів тому

      @@ARichardP They don't give a squat what the public thinks. And why should they, they will die on the bench or retire from the bench.

  • @katherinebuttigieg780
    @katherinebuttigieg780 9 днів тому +1

    Well said! its up to the voters .

  • @debhurd8898
    @debhurd8898 12 днів тому +1

    Scotus should be abolished. Is it really necessary?

  • @MrMisuma
    @MrMisuma 12 днів тому +3

    I’m beginning to have unhealthy thoughts about a certain person, which name I can’t say out loud, but it rhymes with Hump. When that day comes, I hope America will heal.

  • @user-xc8qu8fx7w
    @user-xc8qu8fx7w 12 днів тому +2

    Why do we have
    Justices Who were appointed by a corrupt politician sitting in judgment of the politician who appointed them?? A case like this is exactly what recusal is for.

  • @tannaorr4133
    @tannaorr4133 12 днів тому +1

    They never should have never took this up. No faith in that court at all.

  • @franklinjohn5067
    @franklinjohn5067 12 днів тому +1

    So, if the integrity of Supreme court Justices has become suspect, '"WHAT'S NEXT" ??

  • @user-sh6jg5bb5d
    @user-sh6jg5bb5d 12 днів тому +10

    The corrupt court needs to be held accountable for their actions. I hope Biden wins or refuses to step down. The Supreme Court deserves what they get. BIDEN needs to expand the court with as many judges he needs.

  • @scillyautomatic
    @scillyautomatic 12 днів тому +11

    I can't wait to see Biden try to debate Trump!! This will be the ultimate takedown!

    • @argentin3
      @argentin3 12 днів тому +3

      I can't wait to see Trump take the witness stand.
      Oh wait, he's to cowardly to do that.

    • @robyoung-pl1gq
      @robyoung-pl1gq 12 днів тому +1

      You have to score 70 -80 on an IQ test to be a trumper.

    • @Dingleberry777
      @Dingleberry777 12 днів тому +4

      Old Joe won't show.

    • @unbehagen686
      @unbehagen686 12 днів тому

      Old Trump didn't show for Republican Debates so why debate Terrorist Trump?

    • @davidwelsh8026
      @davidwelsh8026 12 днів тому +1

      Four more years…pause 😂

  • @teddyshea3921
    @teddyshea3921 12 днів тому +1

    Imagine Steven Miller as Attorney General-a terrifying prospect. I’ll be seeking asylum in the Bahamas.

  • @patbrennan6572
    @patbrennan6572 12 днів тому +2

    I wonder if this court realizes that Russia, North Korea and Saudi Arabia don't have a Supreme Court.

  • @timwhite7127
    @timwhite7127 12 днів тому +11

    Next statement from SCROTUS will probably be along the lines of "Hey country...nanny nanny boo boo"...

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 12 днів тому +1

      "Trump's immune but Biden isn't! Neener neener!"

  • @nicholasgallanis7539
    @nicholasgallanis7539 12 днів тому +5

    Entertaining the idea that any American is above the law is disgraceful, especially by the highest court in the land!

  • @GeneTurner-gg4yo
    @GeneTurner-gg4yo 12 днів тому +1

    Funny how all of the lower courts with the exception of judge Cannon have all held and have ruled without political favor. This version of the supreme court is pitiful!!

  • @MarkvanBuskirk
    @MarkvanBuskirk 11 днів тому

    Thank you for covering this

  • @7scientist
    @7scientist 12 днів тому +35

    The Korrupt Klown Kourt's reputation is secure

    • @Blacks4trump2024
      @Blacks4trump2024 12 днів тому +4

      Yes it's racist....with Thomas at the helm😂🤡😂🤡

    • @TimeLord675
      @TimeLord675 12 днів тому

      @@Blacks4trump2024 Ever heard of the phrase "Uncle Tom"?

    • @BlueTsunami.2024
      @BlueTsunami.2024 12 днів тому +1

      I see what you did there. Excellent!

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 12 днів тому +1

      @@Blacks4trump2024 Uncle Clarence isn't at the helm, genius.

    • @varianfuller811
      @varianfuller811 12 днів тому +1

      Love what you did there.

  • @kateskeys
    @kateskeys 12 днів тому +9

    Fox hates the fact that CNN has intelligent guests on - I love it

  • @theresawolfson6501
    @theresawolfson6501 12 днів тому +1

    Thank You Mr Tribe &
    Ms Vance. Your information helps to understand the laws &
    how the courts process
    Legal matters.

  • @colleenlyons8617
    @colleenlyons8617 12 днів тому

    Absolutely Professor Laurence Tribe!

  • @buddymckimmey3545
    @buddymckimmey3545 12 днів тому +4

    Bush , Obama , Biden WHEWthat was close😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @matthewstearns289
    @matthewstearns289 12 днів тому +5

    Term limits.

  • @themystic1938
    @themystic1938 12 днів тому

    What do the words "hurt" and "reputation" mean to people who have lifetime appointments with zero accountability? Can they even be impeached?

  • @JJ-gg4xm
    @JJ-gg4xm 12 днів тому +6

    It’s all over if this goes sideways, and btw SCOTUS don’t care

  • @sircasm6578
    @sircasm6578 12 днів тому +4

    Can we please talk about the uncle and the cannibals?? 😂

  • @brettnelson6710
    @brettnelson6710 12 днів тому +1

    The highest court making a landmark decision on a case that would set a precedent for future presidents should give them extreme pause.

  • @athenaellis1902
    @athenaellis1902 11 днів тому +1

    The worst happened when Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away and her seat was available to unworthy judges. :(

  • @scillyautomatic
    @scillyautomatic 12 днів тому +8

    Biden: "Yes, I will debate Trump PAUSE."

    • @Dingleberry777
      @Dingleberry777 12 днів тому

      "Where's Jackie pause ?"

    • @robyoung-pl1gq
      @robyoung-pl1gq 12 днів тому +1

      You have to score 70 -80 on an IQ test to be a trumper.

    • @ChinkataVictoriaOkwudiri
      @ChinkataVictoriaOkwudiri 12 днів тому

      😂😂😂 pause... continue 😂😂😂

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 12 днів тому

      "Think of it, magnets. Now all I know about magnets is this: Give me a glass of water, let me drop it on the magnets, that's the end of the magnets." I'll take "lost a step" over THAT.

  • @Crash1025Bandicoot7
    @Crash1025Bandicoot7 12 днів тому +4

    Trump 2024 Save America 🇺🇸
    - secure borders
    - strong economy
    - strong military
    - pro 1st and 2nd amendment
    - pro bill of rights
    - pro democracy
    - pro America First
    - pro equality
    - pro world peace
    - helps our veterans
    - low inflation and interest rates for all Americans
    - supports poor and middle class Americans for success
    Tell your friends and family.

    • @BHShaman
      @BHShaman 12 днів тому

      - Republicans veto'd their own bill
      - Economy is the strongest in decades with low unemployment
      - Supplying Ukraine outdated equipment and saving billions in decommissioning cost, WHILE backfilling decades old equipment with shiny new stuff makes out military stonger and more modern.
      Sounds like you support Biden

    • @unbehagen686
      @unbehagen686 12 днів тому

      You spelled Roosevelt wrong

  • @kennyc6597
    @kennyc6597 12 днів тому +1

    No it won't, it has nothing in common.

  • @jamesrosser6298
    @jamesrosser6298 12 днів тому +4

    TRUMP for President 2024 the best choice!

  • @sandtrapwarrior
    @sandtrapwarrior 12 днів тому +4

    Deal democrats,
    Deal with it. 😎
    Signed,
    SCOTUS 🇺🇸

    • @endthegenocideingaza
      @endthegenocideingaza 12 днів тому +5

      lol, you think it’s funny ? As a dem, I promise the world you’re forcing on us won’t be fun for you. ❤

    • @sandtrapwarrior
      @sandtrapwarrior 12 днів тому

      @@endthegenocideingazacope 😎

    • @DarthSailorMoo
      @DarthSailorMoo 12 днів тому

      Your orange cult leader has no right to be immune from crimes. America's constitution says deal with it.

    • @arussellhart
      @arussellhart 12 днів тому

      Yeah, Democrats. Deal with corruption, lies and cowardice!

    • @DarthSailorMoo
      @DarthSailorMoo 12 днів тому

      @@sandtrapwarrior If it was a dem begging for immunity for crimes you would cry even harder.

  • @Sagey_p
    @Sagey_p 12 днів тому +1

    We protested in Washington DC after that decision... 25 years Later, and I will go protest again... might still have my sign "Supreme Court 5, the People 4."

  • @kennethquintini658
    @kennethquintini658 12 днів тому

    Thanks professor Tribe for your comment ⚖️🇺🇲

  • @user-gz2gu6dz9r
    @user-gz2gu6dz9r 12 днів тому +3

    May God bless and protect Donald Trump. Amen 🙏 ❤❤❤

    • @KNKLHEAD
      @KNKLHEAD 12 днів тому

      If you send him your money, God will bless him a bit more.

  • @IKRico-jg3ej
    @IKRico-jg3ej 12 днів тому +1

    America rise to the values of your forefathers and the ideals of your gods to ascertain what your soul recognizes as truth...and believe it!

  • @JGLy22086
    @JGLy22086 12 днів тому

    I absolutely agree with Professor Tribe!