Nice vid and I had a question, is it better qbcore or esx to build a server and the scripts? and also wouldn't be more easy if the tittle of the videos are the main thing you are doing? I got confused trying you search for when you made the minigame.
Thanks for the feedback and kind words I appreciate that! Noted, and from now on I'll make an effort to do just that and provide some more info in the titles and possibly the descriptions. In an honest opinion, I believe both have their strengths and weaknesses, so when it really comes down to it it's purely personal preference. The biggest difference between the two is that ESX depends on databases whereas QB-core and alike mostly rely on tables within LUA itself. Therefore, if you prefer databases over the table setup then ESX is for you. On the scripting side, I can't tell you which core is better and to me they both seem equally simple and complex because at the end of the day they all rely on functions to execute certain tasks and give certain results and it's up to you as scripter to utilise that. My opinion is however that QB is more malleable and allows more freedom regarding scripting and features which I prefer both as server manager and scripter. Thanks for the question, you really made me think and right now I'm actually really curios about it myself.
Learning how to debug is a very important lesson so i think this is great because this is how it goes in coding you run into problems and then have to find solutions to fix them.
Nice vid and I had a question, is it better qbcore or esx to build a server and the scripts? and also wouldn't be more easy if the tittle of the videos are the main thing you are doing? I got confused trying you search for when you made the minigame.
Thanks for the feedback and kind words I appreciate that! Noted, and from now on I'll make an effort to do just that and provide some more info in the titles and possibly the descriptions.
In an honest opinion, I believe both have their strengths and weaknesses, so when it really comes down to it it's purely personal preference. The biggest difference between the two is that ESX depends on databases whereas QB-core and alike mostly rely on tables within LUA itself. Therefore, if you prefer databases over the table setup then ESX is for you.
On the scripting side, I can't tell you which core is better and to me they both seem equally simple and complex because at the end of the day they all rely on functions to execute certain tasks and give certain results and it's up to you as scripter to utilise that.
My opinion is however that QB is more malleable and allows more freedom regarding scripting and features which I prefer both as server manager and scripter.
Thanks for the question, you really made me think and right now I'm actually really curios about it myself.
@@b0thatv Thanks for the response! i'm trying to built a server of my own
@@JkaynTV You are most welcome! That's pretty awesome, building your own server is quite the journey. What are your goals with it?
@@b0thatv Learn scripting and try to make a playable server
@@JkaynTV I dig it. Really plausible. If you have any question you're welcome to ask in the DC.
Learning how to debug is a very important lesson so i think this is great because this is how it goes in coding you run into problems and then have to find solutions to fix them.
That's exactly that XD