Nuclear Chemistry: Crash Course Chemistry #38

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @crashcourse
    @crashcourse  4 роки тому +73

    Pssst... we made flashcards to help you review the content in this episode! Find them on the free Crash Course App!
    Download it here for Apple Devices: apple.co/3d4eyZo
    Download it here for Android Devices: bit.ly/2SrDulJ

  • @TobyKidMajor
    @TobyKidMajor 11 років тому +694

    All hail Crash Course. Please don't stop making videos at least until I'm out of high school.

    • @onontochowdhury7337
      @onontochowdhury7337 5 років тому +53

      graduate yet?

    • @qaseemtak9368
      @qaseemtak9368 5 років тому +26

      graduate yet?

    • @nicole4502
      @nicole4502 5 років тому +26

      crazy to think ur out already. i’m a sophomore smh

    • @loltrqll
      @loltrqll 5 років тому +1

      @@nicole4502 junior

    • @shelbiej94
      @shelbiej94 5 років тому +6

      Why are you learning about this in high school? Lol

  • @basseenergie
    @basseenergie 11 років тому +474

    Nuclear physicist here, two quibbles with your video. First a small one : at 6:21 you say that beta decay has "higher energy" that alpha decay -- It hasn't. It does have higher range, or ability to penetrate matter, which is due to the electron being 8000 times lighter, and faster than an alpha for roughly the same energy. Second: GAMMA RADIATION IS NOT CAUSED BY ELECTRONS but by changes in the internal state of the nucleus (protons and neutrons jumping shells much as electrons do to emit light). X-rays can be emitted by core electrons following electron capture decay by the nucleus, but that's different and a very specific process. Gammas are emitted by the nucleus. It would be nice to correct this vid, to keep it up to the standard of previous ones. Thanks !

    • @twistiicuber1055
      @twistiicuber1055 5 років тому +119

      Fascinating to see a nuclear physicist, I’m only an 8th grader working on a nuclear chemistry project lol

    • @SpenexOCE
      @SpenexOCE 5 років тому +9

      K

    • @aroveranalysis9978
      @aroveranalysis9978 5 років тому +35

      You probably cringe at fallout lol

    • @e46matt7
      @e46matt7 5 років тому +6

      @@twistiicuber1055 Im 12 in 7th grade, I'm just interested in this because it seems cool, which it is.

    • @twistiicuber1055
      @twistiicuber1055 5 років тому +1

      @Loading_101 cool

  • @ragnkja
    @ragnkja 11 років тому +75

    6:54 An error: Xe is element 54. Element 91 is Protactinium, which has an average mass of 231.03588 g/mol, which means that Pa-234 is an isotope which is heavier than average (meaning I suspect it will pretty soon decay as well).

  • @ScareSans
    @ScareSans 5 років тому +434

    if you think about it, radioactivity is just...
    *S P I C Y A I R*

    • @ScareSans
      @ScareSans 5 років тому +4

      @MAHALAKSHMI PERUMAL why thank you.

    • @changename9728
      @changename9728 5 років тому +5

      this is the greatest thing ive ever read

    • @gizlanabbas7115
      @gizlanabbas7115 4 роки тому +5

      You made me laugh so hard! Thank you!

    • @ScareSans
      @ScareSans 4 роки тому +1

      @@uniqhnd23 Does it count that I'm dead *inside?*

    • @drabberfrog
      @drabberfrog 4 роки тому +1

      wowzers

  • @rettavelle13
    @rettavelle13 11 років тому +16

    Not only have all of these awesome chemistry videos caused me to fall in love with Hank, but they have also effectively prepared me for my chemistry semester final! THANK YOU CRASH COURSE!

  • @message3381
    @message3381 11 років тому +17

    This is awesome. More evidence that we are living in exponential and information rich times. Keep the knowledge coming!

  • @ShellPointe
    @ShellPointe 11 років тому +12

    I've been hoping we would cover nuclear chemistry!!! This is my all time favorite topic. Nuclear pharmacy is like my dream job.

  • @medich1985
    @medich1985 11 років тому +16

    Gamma rays are not generated by transition between electron levels.
    The energy difference is too small.
    Instead, they are generated by re-arrangement of protons and neutrons within the neucleus. They frequently modeled by shell model, too, although very different form the electric one.

  • @jdrevenge
    @jdrevenge 11 років тому +4

    As a Materials Scientist/Engineer, I just want to tell you how much I love these videos. They're so fun. Keep it up, Hank, the signed poster I got from Subbable goes up on the wall as soon as I can find a good frame!

  • @79thdriftwood
    @79thdriftwood 5 років тому +2

    This topic is not easy to process and for him to talk that fast makes it even harder to comprehend.

  • @Titanic-wo6bq
    @Titanic-wo6bq 5 років тому +3

    I love radioactive!
    And nice minecraft reference.

  • @TheAnachronist
    @TheAnachronist 11 років тому +5

    Gamma rays can occur from pure nuclear state transitions without involving electrons at all, when one isomer decays into a more stable one. Generally we talk about Gamma rays only when there's some sort of nuclear process taking place and X-rays when the process involves electrons.

    • @endimion17
      @endimion17 11 років тому

      True. Electrons giving off gamma photons aren't exactly something you hear when you learn about gamma radiation. Nucleus does that job.

    • @TehMuNjA
      @TehMuNjA 11 років тому

      It's true, electron transitions simply do not come in big enough energy intervals to emit gamma rays. A 6s->1s transition in Barium emits an x-ray 20 times less energetic than the gamma ray emitted by the nucleus associated with the 137Cs->137Ba beta decay

  • @lucashebberd353
    @lucashebberd353 8 років тому +53

    Love the Imagine Dragons reference!

  • @sociallyencrypted8522
    @sociallyencrypted8522 6 років тому +3

    0:09 WHOA-OH OH I’M, WHOA-OH OH I’M, RADIOACTIVE, RADIOACTIVE

  • @greenefieldmann3014
    @greenefieldmann3014 11 років тому +6

    In the nuclear industry and in school, they use californium-252 as a neutron source. Never seen 254Cf...
    Also, although you can excite electrons into the energy ranges of nuclear gamma radiation (and vice versa), gamma rays are pretty generally a nuclear phenomenon.
    I appreciate this episode, but it would really be worth doing over a few segments.

  • @15thakuranin2
    @15thakuranin2 9 років тому +244

    Please do Crash Course Physics!

    • @austinharning9148
      @austinharning9148 9 років тому +2

      Hole. y. Shit. YES!!!!

    • @abdullahnaeem2494
      @abdullahnaeem2494 9 років тому +2

      +Random Tech Videos You could go to khan academy

    • @rams6702
      @rams6702 9 років тому +6

      they have one now

    • @keklol88
      @keklol88 8 років тому +4

      +Random Tech Videos It just did *TODAY* FINALLY YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @danielhart5252
      @danielhart5252 7 років тому +1

      Random Tech Videos that would be sho helpful

  • @vishvakseenichamy
    @vishvakseenichamy 9 років тому +60

    At 6:53, how come it Xenon has a number of 91 when Thorium had 90 and when it released it's electron?

    • @twothousandcookies
      @twothousandcookies 9 років тому +3

      +Vishvak Seenichamy
      i think it should be Protactinium (Pa) because thats number 91.

    • @codybaker6423
      @codybaker6423 9 років тому +8

      +Vishvak Seenichamy no no no a neutron turns itself into a proton releasing an electron

    • @RaitoNg
      @RaitoNg 9 років тому +5

      +Vishvak Seenichamy
      There's actually an electron antineutrino wasn't shown in the beta decay equation.
      When the thorium atom decays, one neutron in the nucleus converts into a proton, an electron and an antineutrino. Hence after the decay the number of proton increases (the thorium atom turns into xenon atom) while the nucleon number stays the same (number of neutron reduces by 1).

    • @fpjodfasjfjifapjiaspfjspaf3513
      @fpjodfasjfjifapjiaspfjspaf3513 9 років тому +4

      +Raito Ng I find it a neccesity to correct the typo here. It says "One proton in the nucleus", but I know you meant "One neutron in the nucles converts into..". This was so that people reading your comment will be able to understand what was wrong and what's right. :)
      EDIT:
      According to this information the atomic number should increase by one from the original atomic number. So it should increase from Thorium-234 to Proctactinium-234. This is because the protons increase by 1 and 90+1=91, and the atom with 91 protons is Proctactinium and not Xenon. This was probably just a typo from the guys who made the video and they probably just forgot to do something about it. xD

    • @RaitoNg
      @RaitoNg 9 років тому

      Didn't realize it. Thanks a lot xP

  • @mtchllBarrett
    @mtchllBarrett 10 років тому +81

    If Thorium-234 loses a beta particle, shouldn't it become Protactinium-234? Xenon only has 54 protons.

    • @ugs574
      @ugs574 5 років тому +12

      I think it's a mestake too. besides wikipedia tells thorium dacay forms Ra or Pa (1 neutrom splitting in 1 proton + 1 electron). maybe they should have a nucrear phisic consultant beside a chemestry consultant.

    • @official_ebuddie-r7b
      @official_ebuddie-r7b 4 роки тому +10

      You are correct. This is a mistake.

    • @rahulpakkala4757
      @rahulpakkala4757 4 роки тому +6

      Yes, it is an error

  • @camillejohnson9705
    @camillejohnson9705 8 років тому +426

    dude you're incredibly helpful but talk so so so fast I can't process what you're saying.

    • @Matt-ye2hg
      @Matt-ye2hg 8 років тому +43

      put it at 0.5 speed

    • @isaiahm99
      @isaiahm99 7 років тому +18

      putting it at 2 speed is hilarious

    • @magadzhabraftw6157
      @magadzhabraftw6157 7 років тому +9

      I put it at 1.25 so i can understand xD

    • @quinngruner6549
      @quinngruner6549 7 років тому +14

      I had the same problem but 0.5 speed is too slow so put it 0.75 speed

    • @amoora2235
      @amoora2235 7 років тому +3

      wow thats hilarious

  • @sebastianchem978
    @sebastianchem978 7 років тому +2

    This is the branch of chemistry that I find the most exciting.

  • @manend2
    @manend2 9 років тому +49

    Omg. I've finally seen someone make a reference to the Mutant Zombie from Minecraft!

  • @jasonpatterson9821
    @jasonpatterson9821 6 років тому +1

    Gamma radiation is released directly from the nucleus, not from excited electrons. It's called ionizing radiation for a reason - a gamma ray is powerful enough to knock any electron out of the atom entirely.

  • @GabeNewellDFTBA
    @GabeNewellDFTBA 10 років тому +74

    DID SOMEONE SAY HALF-LIFE!?

    • @Andrew-Graham
      @Andrew-Graham 10 років тому +2

      yes half-life refers to the time it takes for an element to reach half of it's lifespan

    • @tinsheep700
      @tinsheep700 10 років тому +17

      an g I don't think you got the reference

    • @superyoshigo
      @superyoshigo 10 років тому +11

      A HALF-LIFE OF 3 SECONDS?

    • @mrchangcooler
      @mrchangcooler 10 років тому +8

      halflife 3 confirmed

    • @FROPDESAI
      @FROPDESAI 9 років тому +2

      Lord GabeN Lord Gaben, enlighten us by Confirming Half life 3.

  • @zeips9835
    @zeips9835 5 років тому +1

    this guy knows everything

  • @DehimVerveen
    @DehimVerveen 9 років тому +3

    At 7:25, you say that gamma decay is the transition of an electron in the shell to a lower energy state, but it's not. It's the transition of the core, to a lower energy state formation.

  • @BlockrealmMC124
    @BlockrealmMC124 11 років тому +1

    That intro was the single best thing I have ever seen or imagined seeing ever

  • @topkis7398
    @topkis7398 11 років тому +14

    I had a test on this on friday, looked everywhere for a radioactivity video and of course its posted just 3 short days later -_-

  • @Wardrage
    @Wardrage 8 років тому +2

    Thank you for your great work! This is my go to channel for any chemistry subjects I need help with. I really enjoy your random dry humor it definitely helps me stay attentive! Keep it up!

  • @andrealiu5106
    @andrealiu5106 10 років тому +37

    There was a typo! At 5:55, it should not be Xe, it should be the element Pa.

    • @GriffinReda
      @GriffinReda 6 років тому +1

      Grammar Nazi

    • @odey_340
      @odey_340 6 років тому +4

      No
      Chemistry nazi

    • @hectichive889
      @hectichive889 6 років тому +1

      Andrea Liu, There isn't even an Xe in there, Idk what you're talking about... Helium (He) is in there! But there's no Xenon (Xe) in there.

    • @greennitricoxide2706
      @greennitricoxide2706 6 років тому

      Wrong time. It is 6:39

    • @shahvez.2610
      @shahvez.2610 6 років тому

      I KNEW SOMETHING WAS WRONG I WAS SO CONFUSED

  • @danielbass5507
    @danielbass5507 4 роки тому +6

    When your teacher just asigns videos for you to watch during online school and you break your computer because the video is worse than your actual teacher

  • @thanpalo
    @thanpalo 11 років тому +16

    I literally just had a chemistry exam about this on Friday... this would been so helpful! ._.

  • @jakestine1521
    @jakestine1521 Рік тому +1

    It feels somber learning about radioactivity now.....best wishes with your treatment ❤❤❤

  • @SparlsOfficial
    @SparlsOfficial 4 роки тому +25

    So, the half-life of Bismuth is 7.7 Septillion years. (‭7,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000‬)
    BRUUUUUHHHH

  • @mslv2jmp
    @mslv2jmp 11 років тому +4

    Hi guys, I love the videos! One issue is you're not on the mark for gamma decay. This is similar to excited electronic state de-excitation but it is actually nuclear energy levels of protons or neutrons falling to the ground state in the nucleus. I am a professor of nuclear chemistry btw

  • @Kante0
    @Kante0 11 років тому +1

    Good video, guys. Many people have pointed out, that gamma rays originate from transitions within the nucleus. I agree with that but one should still mention that electron capture reactions, which are a variant of beta decays, lead to energetic photons being emitted by an electron. Nevertheless those photons are referred to as x-rays.

  • @mynameismatt2010
    @mynameismatt2010 11 років тому +3

    Thank you for making it seem way less crazy when I tell my coworkers that I learned how to make yellow cake at home. :)

  • @TheHarmse
    @TheHarmse 11 років тому +1

    Literally just about to write a paper about Arsenic 74. This really helped me understand the concept of nuclear chemistry! Thank you!

  • @georgethomas4889
    @georgethomas4889 10 років тому +32

    You missed out the anti-neutrino in the beta minus decay equation.

  • @mabeckca
    @mabeckca 10 років тому +1

    @ 3:40
    "Hello Gordon!"

  • @alessiodore96
    @alessiodore96 11 років тому +8

    Hello mr.Green,
    Could you make some videos about volcanos, earthquakes etc when you finish the chemistry? It'd be very helpful, you're a very good teacher. Greetings from Italy.

  • @claudiavandenbroeck
    @claudiavandenbroeck 7 років тому +1

    These videos are just amazing. I've been amusing myself quite a long time now with binge-watching Crash Courses on all kinds of subjects. It truly answers a lot of interesting questions that don't get enough attention in class!

  • @GreenGiant400
    @GreenGiant400 9 років тому +6

    While electrons do emit photons when changing energy levels, this is simply fluorescence not gamma radiation. Gamma radiation is created when the nucleus relaxes from an excited state.

    • @kathrynstone9904
      @kathrynstone9904 9 років тому

      YESSSS. Glad someone else caught that.

    • @TheRealPidid
      @TheRealPidid 9 років тому

      Gamma radiation is a wave, just like light is. Photons are force carriers that act like waves and particles. So depending on the element and energy level, an electron could give off Gamma radiation. Plus, if you think photons are just visible light(fluorescence), you're an idiot. All EMR (electromagnetic radiation which is carried by photons) can be emitted from electrons falling down a level state, which includes all the types said in the video but also includes radiowaves, and X rays. Just depends on initial energy state of electron and where it rests. Please, educate yourself before making mindless comments like you did

    • @kathrynstone9904
      @kathrynstone9904 9 років тому +2

      Alex is referencing the part of the video that explains gamma decay as the release of photons from electrons as they transition to lower energy states. While electrons can release gamma photons, the problem is that electrons are not the source of gamma photons during gamma decay--Alex is correct in stating that the gamma photons originate in the NUCLEUS as it relaxes from an excited state. Plus, fluorescence does not only refer to visible light--it's just refers to things that can only emit light by absorbing light first. And the term can be applied to what happens when electrons absorb and then release photons. More specifically, it's called resonance fluorescence when referring to atomic spectra, but it's still a type of fluorescence.

    • @GreenGiant400
      @GreenGiant400 9 років тому +2

      Parker Stromberg I am well aware of what the electromagnetic spectrum is. Although they historically have been differentiated by wavelength, the modern convention actually is to distinguish between x-rays and gamma rays based on their source. This means there is some overlap between the energy ranges of x-rays and gamma rays.
      But to be clear the video is talking about gamma decay which occurs in the nucleous, and has nothing to do with the energy levels of electrons.

    • @TheRealPidid
      @TheRealPidid 9 років тому +1

      +Kathryn Stone I see what you guys mean now. Sorry about that

  • @kaviamudhanvenkateshkumar3327
    @kaviamudhanvenkateshkumar3327 6 років тому +4

    For Those Who Dont Know The First Song Actually Was Radioactive-Imagine Dragons

  • @whiskerstreetbakery
    @whiskerstreetbakery 11 років тому +1

    Omg I just happened to need this for next Monday's task!:O THANKS!

  • @reaper4812
    @reaper4812 5 років тому +4

    He didn't say Nucular. I'm so happy.

  • @toasted_mello
    @toasted_mello 4 місяці тому

    I got covid and had to miss a whole week of university chemistry lectures, you're saving my butt once again, Hank!

  • @hudsonhovil1621
    @hudsonhovil1621 11 років тому +8

    Since when did Thorium decay straight into Xenon via Beta radiation? Thorium decays to Protactinium this way, and Xenon's atomic number is 58. Not quite sure how this happened, but it's a brilliant video anyways.

  • @RajeetSinghTVr
    @RajeetSinghTVr 4 роки тому +1

    These videos are brilliant

  • @mrgoedhart
    @mrgoedhart 11 років тому +3

    John, you made a little mistake: Gamma-decay comes from nuclei changing states. When electron emits high energy radiations because they change states its called x-rays,

  • @prophecypitch
    @prophecypitch 11 років тому +2

    "You seem to have brought your clever pants today" That sass lol

  • @chris80988
    @chris80988 11 років тому +3

    Perhaps a video of the industrial uses, and the types of sources used would be a good idea.

  • @dangrene617
    @dangrene617 8 років тому +2

    When you discuss gamma radiation, you talk about electrons being in an excited state. I know that's how much visible and near-visible light is emitted, but for nuclear gamma radiation isn't it that the nuclear arrangement of protons and neutrons is in a higher-energy excited state?

  • @tnttiger3079
    @tnttiger3079 8 років тому +4

    HANK GREEN MADE AN IMAGINE DRAGONS REFERENCE
    my life is literally complete

  • @aimeverrier5720
    @aimeverrier5720 8 років тому +1

    0:30 I bring you peace! I bring you love!
    ITS BRINGING LOVE DONT LET IT GET AWAY
    BREAK ITS LEGS

  • @MaggieDiMenna
    @MaggieDiMenna 9 років тому +5

    Half way through this video i hear the crash course theme playing from my kitchen. I pause and shout, "MOM ARE YOU WATCHING A CRASH COURSE VIDEO?!?" She replied with, "YEAH I'M WATCHING ONE ON THE DIGESTIVE SYSYEM." To which I replied with, "I'M WATCHING A CRASH COUSE ON NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY!"

  • @kalanibrandon2841
    @kalanibrandon2841 11 років тому +1

    I love chemistry

  • @JaketheBakedSsnake
    @JaketheBakedSsnake 11 років тому +8

    Hey anthony, if you drive a car every day, then you're risking your life. It's worth it though, just like nuclear energy. Don't you think if more people learn about nuclear science, we are more likely to make it safer?

  • @brycealley5457
    @brycealley5457 9 років тому +2

    (1:14) Totally wanted mutant Hank to be holding a mop in his hand a la Toxic Avenger.

  • @kingjadyn5669
    @kingjadyn5669 5 років тому +4

    bruh we’re watching you in class as classwork

  • @kennethisi7759
    @kennethisi7759 9 років тому

    Just want to say I've watched most of these videos for my ap test tomorrow and watching these has been most helpful.

  • @DafyddWillz
    @DafyddWillz 11 років тому +7

    Hold on. Thorium-234 decays into Protactinium-234m and definitely not Xenon-234, for two main reasons: Xenon-234 doesn't exist in any form, and Xenon's atomic number is 54 not 91, so the only way it would do that would be through trihextuple positron decay, which is completely impossible, since anything more than double is quite implausible, and would cause a huge amount of radiation. Also you should at least say that there are more types of radiation, but that you don't have time to talk about things like neutron decay, electron and neutron capture, and hypothetical things like proton decay. I knew this, and I'm only 15 (although I am the top of my class in chemistry), however it doesn't bother me much because the other episodes have been excellent, and I understand how difficult it is to explain everything in 10 minutes.

  • @romantheflash
    @romantheflash 11 років тому +1

    This was awesome, I think I finally starting to understand Nuclear Chemistry.

  • @aashnavaid6918
    @aashnavaid6918 8 років тому +14

    HANK mentioned Imagine dragons!!! my life is complete.

  • @joybarnes-johnson9727
    @joybarnes-johnson9727 5 років тому +1

    LOVE it for so many reasons but the biggies for me were Xe and at 9:10 should have 6 neutrons (along with a full notation showing mass and charge)

  • @whynot5331
    @whynot5331 2 роки тому +3

    Why is he racing 🏁😵

  • @waterr.333
    @waterr.333 8 років тому

    BEAUTIFUL OUTFIT JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT OUT THERE. SO CLASSY

  • @ThisIsMe1240
    @ThisIsMe1240 11 років тому +7

    Like if you think that a Crash Course/ Thought Cafe periodic table with the little elements doodles guys would awesome.

  • @Sb129
    @Sb129 11 років тому

    I love how this simplifies otherwise complex information, schools need to be taught like this

  • @Tesla_Death_Ray
    @Tesla_Death_Ray 11 років тому +8

    This is the most viewed episode since the first

  • @k.chriscaldwell4141
    @k.chriscaldwell4141 7 років тому +1

    Thanks for the video, but you should replace it with a corrected one that does not have Gamma radiation being emitted by excited electrons. Gamma radiation is emitted by the nucleus.

  • @jesse156
    @jesse156 5 років тому +9

    From what I’ve learned in school. I’ve had a discord conversation that taught me more than an entire semester.

  • @STalvacchia
    @STalvacchia 11 років тому +1

    It would be awesome if Crash Course made quizlets (google quizlet if you haven't heard of it) to accompany some of their lessons. Not that you don't already offer enough for free. Maybe viewers could help make quizlets for the videos.

  • @levochka3301
    @levochka3301 9 років тому +7

    OMFG IMAGINE DRAGONS REFERENCE THOUGH IM LAUGHING

  • @endimion17
    @endimion17 11 років тому +1

    I think this subject is a great idea to tackle because general population really has no clue about it.
    Just one tiny correction - gamma rays or any other photons aren't "pure energy". Energy is the ability to do work. Photons are particles that carry energy. The fact that they go at the speed of light and cease to exist after absorption is something different.
    Anyway, great work. I'm looking forward to see the second part.
    Suggestion - if you talk about uranium, or any other element or compound, bring it and show it to the camera.

  • @DracoMhuuh
    @DracoMhuuh 11 років тому +7

    Usually your videos are great Hank, but I think you've been iffy on the definition of gamma radiation. While everywhere gamma rays are just a form of EM wave with an energy higher than a certain energy and CAN be produced by electron transitions in this case the more relevant definition is (I think) that those are EM waves produced IN the nucleus given that you're talking about nuclear physics. You should perhaps also have explained beta plus and beta minus decay since they differ greatly. But otherwise, given the 10 minutes I think this is great!

  • @AwkwardHester
    @AwkwardHester 11 років тому +1

    yes gamma rays are the most dangerous in a way (especially when you arent coming into close contact with the form of radiation) because it can penetrate your skin, but if you ate something containing alpha particles it would be far more harmful, because they wont be able to escape your body and will just go around ionising your cells until you die
    nice
    and beta is also dangerous
    (and did you mention beta + decay? or the formulae for them? like how ß- is when n--> p + e- + anti electron neutrino and ß+ is when p --> n + e+ + electron neutrino)

  • @aeroscience9834
    @aeroscience9834 10 років тому +12

    What's the difference between nuclear chemistry and nuclear physics?

    • @vishvakseenichamy
      @vishvakseenichamy 9 років тому +12

      Aeroscience The answer is basically in the name. Nuclear Chemistry deals with the chemical components of the of the nuclear particles such as plutonium and uranium. Nuclear Physics really deals with how everything is going to work out. When building a nuclear reactor, you need both scientists working closely with each other to make sure everything runs smoothly and no incidents happen in the present or in the future.

    • @aeroscience9834
      @aeroscience9834 9 років тому +4

      I see. It's just, when I took chemistry, they had a unit on "nuclear chemistry", and when I took physics, they had a unit on "nuclear physics". But they covered the exact same material.

    • @vishvakseenichamy
      @vishvakseenichamy 9 років тому +8

      Aeroscience When you get into more complicated sciences, you will see that there are differences. A simple way to see the difference is this quote from yahoo answers which I strongly agree with."nuclear physics explain the components involved in nuclear reaction.
      nuclear chemistry explains how the reaction happens between the components."
      -v_chaitan

    • @aeroscience9834
      @aeroscience9834 9 років тому +4

      I see, thank you for clarifying.

    • @saintless
      @saintless 9 років тому +2

      Aeroscience Honestly, I'd call this nuclear physics, as presented.

  • @sandeepkumarabbugari1824
    @sandeepkumarabbugari1824 6 років тому

    Many people likes to learn things online. Please make sure there are no mistakes in it. In this one I observed two mistakes 1) Thorium when emits electron decays into Palladium. 2) Gamma rays are emitted not due to electron transition but when a nucleus gives out it's excited energy.

  • @MarielAbella
    @MarielAbella 11 років тому +3

    i just want to say, thank you crashcourse for being...well, crashcourse., you have no idea how much your videos help me understand chemistry better ; ^ ;
    i've got finals in a few days, and with the help of your videos, i think i'm going to ace it :>

  • @fred321cba
    @fred321cba 10 років тому +1

    In gamma decay, the nucleus goes from an excited state to a ground state, not an electron.

  • @rjr81
    @rjr81 11 років тому +5

    Aren't most gamma rays produced by nuclear transitions rather than electron transitions? 100 keV is a lot of energy for an electron transition.

    • @HalfgildWynac
      @HalfgildWynac 11 років тому

      Yeah, that's an inaccuracy. Though, "photons"/"gamma rays" are often used interchangebly, i.e. even when the photons are produced in ways other that nuclear transitions.

  • @AshTheHeroine
    @AshTheHeroine 11 років тому +1

    THANK YOU SO MUCH I HAVE AN EXAM ON THIS TOMORROW THX HANK

  • @GoodasGuilty
    @GoodasGuilty 11 років тому +4

    "Now You've heard of Half Life"
    a hahahaha ! Yes, i'm new!

  • @justarandomdude4
    @justarandomdude4 7 років тому

    Thanks man.....really helped.

  • @TH-im8kg
    @TH-im8kg 11 років тому +15

    Doesn't Xenon (Xe) have proton number of 54 not 91 which is Protactinium (Pa)?

  • @Tea.TBlock
    @Tea.TBlock 7 років тому

    I love Crash Course....all videos are fun and perfect....Love it.

  • @somesortofdeliciousbiscuit3704
    @somesortofdeliciousbiscuit3704 8 років тому +8

    Xenon 91?! - Do you really mean Protactinium 91?

  • @archiedollars8607
    @archiedollars8607 5 років тому

    lol this guy's everywhere props Hank

  • @swarburton24
    @swarburton24 11 років тому +17

    He said half-life multiple times, that's Half-Life 3 confirmed!!!!

  • @veedee_beast
    @veedee_beast 6 років тому

    Love Hank's t-shirt here

  • @Scott-ir5eg
    @Scott-ir5eg 9 років тому +47

    If you slow this video down he seems drunk.

  • @myNameIsEmanon
    @myNameIsEmanon 11 років тому

    Hank for President!

  • @thebestnameever7423
    @thebestnameever7423 8 років тому +5

    what happened to positron decay.....

  • @bobbieprice6371
    @bobbieprice6371 4 роки тому

    THANK YOU your videos really help me

  • @CesarCicero
    @CesarCicero 11 років тому +11

    Hi, I really love your show but as a physicist, I must point an error... The second type of radiation isn't an electron, is an anti-positron, this particle have all the proprieties of the positron but the sign of the charge and has the mass of -1 because it's necessary produce 1 proton to produce an anti-proton, so you gain 1 proton for each anti-proton
    Ps. I make a mistake changing the particles... anti-protons have mass of a proton, beta particle have a very tine mass... see the comments bellow...
    The beta particle is indeed an electron

    • @samuelshackleton6741
      @samuelshackleton6741 11 років тому +8

      A positron is just an anti-electron, so an anti-positron is another name for an electron

    • @CesarCicero
      @CesarCicero 11 років тому +7

      Ohhh, sorry, I made a mistake when I write the post. Every positron in my post change by proton... Any positron is created in an radioactive reaction

    • @samuelshackleton6741
      @samuelshackleton6741 11 років тому +3

      Beta radiation isn't anti-protons though - β− emissions are electrons, and β+ emissions are positrons. The proton number increases by one because a neutron becomes a proton in β− decay.

    • @PatrickMcDougle
      @PatrickMcDougle 11 років тому +1

      Cesar Cícero if I'm not mistaken, you can edit your comments now. Try it out!

    • @CesarCicero
      @CesarCicero 11 років тому +3

      You are right... If the beta particle was an anti-positron it should be mass, the illusion of knowledge is a dangerous thing. I should have checked this information before posting, thanks for correcting me... Indeed beta particles could be positrons as well when a proton decay into a neutron and a beta+ particle, but the beta- (electron) is more common, by the fact that a neutron have more mass than an proton.

  • @gallero7772
    @gallero7772 10 років тому

    I am very thankful for your help. Now i totally understand this!!

  • @tahasilat7394
    @tahasilat7394 6 років тому +5

    Recommendations for watching crash course:
    1. Take notes when you watch the video
    2. Pause the video and replay if you don't understand something
    3. Set the speed to 0.75. This makes it much easier to understand

  • @fitogarcia8
    @fitogarcia8 7 років тому

    I loved the Cake reference

  • @vaccumac
    @vaccumac 11 років тому +11

    Great series, but I'm disappointed at the mistakes in this episode:
    1) Thorium-234 decays into Protactinium-234m not Xenon
    2) Gamma rays are not produced by movement of electrons, but by nucleons. (Electrons produce x rays)
    3)Secondary gamma rays are not the result of the parent being in a exited state prior to decay (although it's possible), but by excess energy released as a result of the primary decay.

    • @MisterTutor2010
      @MisterTutor2010 11 років тому

      I did find it kind of odd hearing electrons returning to their ground causing gamma rays. Generally gamma rays are associated with nuclear transitions, x-rays are associated with core electronic transitions, and UV and visible light are associated with valance electronic transition.