Day 7 HW Conditional Probability + Independent vs Dependent Events

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 148

  • @lisakinney3747
    @lisakinney3747 3 роки тому +3

    This is so helpful! I really needed something to help me understand so I can help my daughter with her homework. Thanks!!

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  3 роки тому

      Helping your kids with their math is tough! I’m glad I could help. I have full courses worth of videos through calculus. Use my channel as a resource. 😎

  • @kirollosmagdy275
    @kirollosmagdy275 6 років тому +2

    thank you , you're the only one who made it clear that p(A and B) = p(A) . p(B) only when they are independent

  • @nabilahdfah5827
    @nabilahdfah5827 3 роки тому +1

    thank you so much! watching this as my final revision for my exam tomorrow

  • @Sholtzeee
    @Sholtzeee 6 років тому +5

    "target over total"..been struggling and as soon as you said that it made sense. and those tests of independence, thanks ! i get it. finally

  • @aubreybanguis3616
    @aubreybanguis3616 7 років тому +33

    Thank you so much! So direct and straight to the point! I love you for this!!

  • @ElizabethMartinez-nq4co
    @ElizabethMartinez-nq4co 7 років тому +13

    Thank you ! I have been struggling with these type of problems for 3 days.

  • @thewoodhouse1
    @thewoodhouse1 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you. In just the first two minutes, you have given me the answers I have been searching for.

  • @robloxvempor
    @robloxvempor 2 роки тому

    I hate how I found these after my school semester finished. The time where I don’t wanna study lol… AND THEN I GET THESE! Such good ones alos

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  2 роки тому

      I wish you had found them sooner! Look around the channel to see what else is there. I have playlists by subject and unit. Find your next unit and watch the videos ahead of time. 😎

  • @christopherokine5910
    @christopherokine5910 6 років тому +1

    So exited to have this. You make teaching very practical and real. Thanks

  • @yvonnekiogora9942
    @yvonnekiogora9942 6 років тому +1

    Your illustrations have been clear and hence made my studying easy for my exams. Thank you all the way form Kenya

  • @princebull8730
    @princebull8730 7 років тому +1

    excellent, maths weigh over my head is now solve by your step by step system

  • @jabulanincube5910
    @jabulanincube5910 5 років тому +2

    Excellent,well understood

  • @farheenyousuf6199
    @farheenyousuf6199 5 років тому +1

    V clear and made simple,thanks

  • @76Rita76
    @76Rita76 7 років тому +18

    Great review before my quiz thanks!

  • @faisala.2827
    @faisala.2827 4 роки тому +1

    hi, thank you for the video. in 18:39 (problem 6) I am not sure how are these events are dependent on each other? they seem pretty independent to me. Same goes to problem 5, how are these events independent if they share the outcome "3"... Sorry I am struggling with understanding this but I do understand the calculation.

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  4 роки тому

      Faisal Alfaiz I think you are confusing the concept of dependent vs. independent with overlapping vs. mutually exclusive. When you are trying to judge whether events are independent, you are not meant to use your intuition to figure it out. The definition is based on the calculation. You are just meant to do the calculation and trust the result.

  • @jhonen32629
    @jhonen32629 6 років тому +2

    Very straightforward presentation. Thank you!

  • @moseschabala1377
    @moseschabala1377 5 років тому +2

    very helpful and i have learnt

  • @saqlainhaiderkazmi2378
    @saqlainhaiderkazmi2378 7 років тому +9

    Great for my exams preparation !!

  • @hanaasalih4900
    @hanaasalih4900 6 років тому +1

    Thank you so much for your time!

  • @israelwikech8332
    @israelwikech8332 6 років тому +1

    Thank you so much. For sure I will pass the exam!

  • @victoryk.1354
    @victoryk.1354 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you🤗

  • @rikhilchilka2846
    @rikhilchilka2846 4 роки тому

    Thanks a lot! I figure out the answer to the question I was stuck on with the first minute of your vid.

  • @puterinuruljannah9271
    @puterinuruljannah9271 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much! This is super good :)

  • @bunmichukwu1602
    @bunmichukwu1602 4 роки тому

    Great!!! Blessings from Nigeria.

  • @شروقعامرطارشعلي
    @شروقعامرطارشعلي 4 роки тому

    Can you help me please
    1-A company has three machines B1, B2, and B3 for making 1 k resistors. It has
    been observed that 80% of resistors produced by B1 are within 50 of the nominal
    value. Machine B2 produces 90% of resistors within 50 of the nominal value. The
    percentage for machine B3 is 60%. Each hour, machine B1 produces 3000 resistors,
    B2 produces 4000 resistors, and B3 produces 3000 resistors. All of the resistors are
    mixed together at random in one bin and packed for shipment. What is the probability
    that the company ships a resistor that is within 50 of the nominal value?
    2-Suppose that we have two bags each containing black and white balls. One bag contains three times as many white balls as blacks. The other bag contains three times as many black balls as white. Suppose we choose one of these bags at random. For this bag we select five balls at random, replacing each ball after it has been selected. The result is that we find 4 white balls and one black. What is the probability that we were using the bag with mainly white balls?

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  4 роки тому

      Sherouk Taresh This is a bit over my head I’m afraid. What class is this for? I teach geometry to HS sophomores. We don’t go very hard core.

  • @noudie7305
    @noudie7305 5 років тому +1

    Thank you so much the best explanation ever !

  • @annakarinina692
    @annakarinina692 5 років тому +1

    So helpful! Thanks for sharing this.

  • @kasayekelkay6579
    @kasayekelkay6579 6 років тому +1

    Extremely very helpful explanation!!!....thanks a lot!!!!

  • @LindsayHuh
    @LindsayHuh 7 років тому +8

    thank you for making this video! very helpful:))

  • @chrisortiz2640
    @chrisortiz2640 5 років тому

    My teacher is horrible at explaining and teaching us, and it is especially more frustrating when I go and ask him for help. It is like he can give me the answer, or show the process to me and hooe I understand it, or I endlessly guess on how to do something I have no clue what so do.

  • @zabrinnamariel
    @zabrinnamariel 6 років тому +2

    fantastic. awesome explanation. best teacher ever. thanks a lot :)

  • @lyh07749
    @lyh07749 7 років тому +2

    For question 1, is it should be a conditional probability problem? Let's define A=winner win the gold medal and B=winner from the United States, my understanding is that the question is asking P(A|B).
    P(A)=301/928=0.324; P(B)=97/928=0.105; P(A and B)=39/928=0.042. Therefore, P(A|B)=P(A and B)/P(B)=0.4.
    Please correct me, thank you!

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  7 років тому

      Notice that your answer (0.4) and my answer (0.4021) are very close. The bottom line is that your answer is a tiny bit off because you are rounding and I am not. You say that P(B)=97/928 = 0.105, but it does not because 97/928=0.104525862… You say that P(A and B)=39/928=0.042 but it does not because 39/928=0.042025862… Let’s do the problem using your method, but without rounding.
      P(A|B)=P(A and B)/P(B)
      P(A|B)=(39/928)/(97/928)
      P(A|B)=(39/928)*(928/97)
      P(A|B)=(39/97)
      P(A|B)=0.402061856…
      P(A|B) is about 0.4021 or 40.21%
      I think the method that I used in the video is a lot easier though.

    • @lyh07749
      @lyh07749 7 років тому

      That makes sense! Thank you!!!

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  7 років тому

      You are very welcome my friend. :-)

    • @mohanadhamed8140
      @mohanadhamed8140 7 років тому

      P(A/B)=p(A and B)÷p(B)
      2400/4000 ÷1600/4000

  • @sidbeb
    @sidbeb 6 років тому +1

    extremely helpful, will definitely subscribe!

  • @tobewritten4853
    @tobewritten4853 4 роки тому

    You so Good...Respect!!

  • @chikomboreromushati7121
    @chikomboreromushati7121 4 роки тому +1

    great indeed

  • @aungkyawkyawhtun2872
    @aungkyawkyawhtun2872 6 років тому +1

    how could i solve in case of mutually exclusive which probabilities are P(A); (0

    • @zakfor111
      @zakfor111 5 років тому

      It is 0 as their intersection is zero because of mutually exclusive charactiristic

  • @replyanand9
    @replyanand9 6 років тому +1

    Thanks for your video

  • @luyandangutyana7275
    @luyandangutyana7275 5 років тому +1

    Thank you alot for your explanation, it's helped me

  • @sabrinaalam6055
    @sabrinaalam6055 6 років тому +2

    May God bless you .

  • @gursharnsekhon07
    @gursharnsekhon07 4 роки тому

    Is it necessary to put answers always in percentage. Does it effect marks if we put them in decimels. Thanks

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  4 роки тому

      Gurr e Sekhon That will vary by teacher. I personally accept all forms unless I specify otherwise in the directions.

  • @chrisortiz2640
    @chrisortiz2640 5 років тому

    I hate that nothing really helps me unless someone is helping me one one. It I don't understand something that is most likely the only way it will help, and I tried tutoring it doesn't help me as well. It must be the exact style of problems I am Doing, and go though every variation for me to understand it pretty much.

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  5 років тому +1

      That sounds so frustrating. I'm sorry you have to go through this.

  • @geishelvalverde5405
    @geishelvalverde5405 7 років тому +1

    Question. Why are you dividing by 100 and 8, etc. on problem 2?

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  7 років тому

      (I think you meant problem 3 so I will answer based on that.) Probability can be written in three ways: fraction, decimal and percent. In this video I tried to show the answer in all three forms. For example: 2/3 = .6667 = 66.67%. If you want your answer as a decimal or a percent, you don't have to divide by 100, 8, etc. You can just divide the two numbers you have like 1600/2400 = .6667 = 66.67%. However, if you want to see the probability as a fraction, you need to reduce the fraction. You know for example that 6/10 reduces to 3/5; I divided the numerator and denominator by 2. Well, 1600/2400 can be reduced in a similar way. The 00 and the end of the numerator and denominator tells me that they are both divisible by 100. If you divide both by 100, you get 16/24 (you basically cross out the zeros). Again, I am just reducing the fraction. Now I need to reduce 16/24. Both numbers are divisible by 2, they are also divisible by 4 and 8. It is quickest to divide by the biggest number you can, so I choose to divide the numerator and denominator by 8. This gives me 2/3.This is the faction form of the probability we were looking for. I just divided by 100 and then 8 in order to reduce the fraction 1600/2400 down to 2/3.

    • @geishelvalverde5405
      @geishelvalverde5405 7 років тому +1

      Thank you so much for explaining with such detail. I sincerely appreciate it. From someone who is trying to become friends with statistics... Urgh! But anyhow, I think I just mastered the "Given that" problems with your help. Hahaha! Thank you again! ;) I look forward to your videos to get me through this semester.

  • @richardclark4383
    @richardclark4383 6 років тому

    I have a conceptual problem with the independent vs. dependent examples: Two consecutive rolls of a fair die (or a single roll of two fair dice) should be independent no matter what. However, whether the result of the second roll can satisfy both conditions is dependent on the conditions stated in the first event. I'm not sure how to reconcile these two views.

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  6 років тому +1

      Can you give me a problem or two quoted from a textbook or at least a teacher illustrating the contradiction you are trying to reconcile. When it comes to probability, it's all about the details. Your initial question is too vague. Let's nail it down with some concrete examples.

    • @banshee511
      @banshee511 6 років тому

      Sure, I was referring to 12:00 and onwards in this video. So for instance, the intersection between 5. These cannot exist simultaneously, so the question poses two disjoint outcomes, which are not independent. However, the dice rolls that produced them are independent events, since the outcome of one roll has no effect on the outcome of the second roll.

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  6 років тому +1

      Here is where I believe your mistake is. You are saying that 5 cannot happen simultaneously. However, you go on to explain that there are two dice (or two rolls). If there are two dice, one could be 5. Therefore the two events CAN exist simultaneously. The two events are independent.
      On the other hand, imagine that you only have one die and you only get one roll. Event A is rolling 5. Since we only have one die and one roll, these events are mutually exclusive (they cannot both happen). In this case Event A and Event B are not independent (AKA dependent).
      Even though there is a connection, do not make the mistake of simply thinking mutually exclusive = dependent, and not mutually exclusive = independent. They are two separate concepts that should be thought of individually. Here is a helpful video (not mine): ua-cam.com/video/0Vqmkpr1grA/v-deo.html

    • @banshee511
      @banshee511 6 років тому

      MrHelpfulNotHurtful thank you so much for your detailed reply! That makes sense

  • @daquandrejohnson9965
    @daquandrejohnson9965 5 років тому

    Genius! Made it simple.

  • @_valles3438
    @_valles3438 7 років тому +3

    Wish I could do my homework with you!

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  7 років тому

      I know. I wish you were in my class! I could use another self-motivated student. :-)

  • @kidistgirmawoldemariam3026
    @kidistgirmawoldemariam3026 7 років тому

    please give ansewer for this question a manager wants to assign 20 workers to four distinct construction job these jobs require 6 4 3 and 7 workers respectively. in how many different ways can the manager assign the workers?

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  7 років тому

      I made a video for you: ua-cam.com/video/boyg7-IcsFI/v-deo.html

  • @2012daffyduck
    @2012daffyduck 6 років тому

    This can't be right. (@ 1:30) you state the P(A and B) = P(A)*P(B) and you also state that P(A|B)=P(A and B)/P(B) which is the same as P(A|B) = (P(A)*P(B))/P(B) the P(B)'s cancel and you get P(A|B) = P(A); this is not correct.

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  6 років тому

      The first formula is for independent events. The second formula is for conditional probability. You can't substitute one formula into the other because they are each used under different circumstances. If you give me an actual problem, I can explain which formula we use and how we use it.

    • @2012daffyduck
      @2012daffyduck 6 років тому

      @@MrHelpfulNotHurtful you should make this distinction in your video. Otherwise point states valid.

  • @tj-8422
    @tj-8422 Рік тому

    Thank you!!!

  • @awindaphilip
    @awindaphilip 6 років тому +1

    I was following till 15:40

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  6 років тому

      I just re-watched it to refresh my memory. If you can think of a specific question you have, I may be able to help. It is really tough to explain math in a comment. I fear that a general explanation here would be more confusing than the video was. However, something very specific is often doable. :-)

  • @Sabritelol
    @Sabritelol 7 років тому +2

    Hey man Honestly im really confused about probability can you make a video of explaining the rules of the conditional prob

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  7 років тому +1

      I don't actually know a set of rules for conditional probability. When I see a problem, I can figure out how to solve it and I can explain how I did it, but for conditional probability, I don't think in terms of rules.

  • @ron7202
    @ron7202 4 роки тому

    Made it so easy!

  • @Shamalwal
    @Shamalwal 5 років тому +1

    That was verygood

  • @wadzanayimarvellous1977
    @wadzanayimarvellous1977 5 років тому

    thanks!!!!!! this was so helpful

  • @lazaca
    @lazaca 6 років тому

    wouldn't the probability of A and B should be 1/5? because A has 3 events (1,3,5) and B has 2 (3,6). If not, can you explain why is it 1/6?

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  6 років тому

      Event A = rolling an odd number
      Event B = rolling a 3 or a 6
      Therefore Event A AND B = (rolling an odd number) AND (rolling 3 or 6) at the same time.
      The only way to roll an odd number AND roll a 3 or 6 is to roll a 3.
      Since there is only 1 winning value out of a total of 6 numbers on the cube, your chances are 1 out of 6 or 1/6.

  • @killeen2007
    @killeen2007 7 років тому +2

    Very helpful! Thanks

  • @kirollosmagdy275
    @kirollosmagdy275 6 років тому

    is there any other formula that applies for independent and doesn't apply for the dependent?

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  6 років тому

      To be honest, I haven't taught this for a few years so I don't remember the details anymore. Sorry :-(

    • @kirollosmagdy275
      @kirollosmagdy275 6 років тому

      never mind , you're still the only one who explained conditional and dependent and independent very clear

  • @Kierosey
    @Kierosey 6 років тому

    What if you already know what p(a) and p(b) is but you have to find p(a|b)

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  6 років тому

      Give me the details of the problem and i will work it out for you. If a chart is involved, take a picture of it, store it in the cloud and post a link to it here.

  • @boburkarimov8916
    @boburkarimov8916 7 років тому

    very clear explenation

  • @sollyrella4689
    @sollyrella4689 4 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @alioum7
    @alioum7 7 років тому

    well done thank you

  • @EditsByShady
    @EditsByShady 5 років тому +2

    You kinda sound like Chance the rapper.

  • @sircharles4690
    @sircharles4690 7 років тому

    Good one.

  • @daisyrodriguez8197
    @daisyrodriguez8197 7 років тому

    Thanks !

  • @gebretewele2021
    @gebretewele2021 6 років тому

    thanks

  • @guaryam311
    @guaryam311 7 років тому

    You ma friend are amazing. you made ne have an Aha!!! moment. thanks

  • @vampayor
    @vampayor 5 років тому

    Sooo hurtful

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  5 років тому

      Sowwy

    • @vampayor
      @vampayor 5 років тому

      MrHelpfulNotHurtful jk haha, i watched almost every probability video u uploaded. i was kinda confused but i think its easy now...
      i still have two chapters to study, i hope u have it in ur playlist...

    • @MrHelpfulNotHurtful
      @MrHelpfulNotHurtful  5 років тому

      @@vampayor Here is a whole other probability playlist that I made recently: ua-cam.com/play/PLUq8yM4tK_aXJQkVr6d-84R9AaAuwWYt2.html
      I did a few things differently, so check it out. You might like some of my new strategies better. :-)

  • @who-vx9ww
    @who-vx9ww 6 років тому

    When you copy an entire video from khan academy.

  • @gebretewele2021
    @gebretewele2021 6 років тому

    thanks