An Introduction to Conditional Probability

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 203

  • @hemm2333
    @hemm2333 Рік тому +7

    Best explanation ever had. I love when he says, please do me a small favour and don't memorise the formula. That's how every teacher should be ❤

  • @barrowmeoct04
    @barrowmeoct04 4 роки тому +39

    I failed probability last year and retaking it this year. Your explanation of Pr (A|B) using the Venn diagram is so absurdly logical I am floored. It's 100 times easier to see than trying to use numbers and algebra. I've yet to learn how to understand concepts in this 'different' way.

  • @rafaelant
    @rafaelant 7 років тому +149

    Believe me, gentleman, you are really good at this!

  • @maestro_100
    @maestro_100 2 роки тому +8

    Informal definition + Formal definition + Intuitive explanation of the definition + examples + further insight on future topics=Amazing Video! ...Thanks so much!

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому

      You're very welcome! It's one of my faves.

  • @battlecrusecruse9155
    @battlecrusecruse9155 4 роки тому +9

    someone give this guy a medal. he is clearing my basics, from the past 3-4 years just confused with this topic and has avoided it .have no words for your efforts really thanks a lot for such awesome video

  • @Daniel-to5jd
    @Daniel-to5jd 5 років тому +23

    the best explanation I've found about this topic so far, thank you man

  • @Francois6048
    @Francois6048 4 роки тому +1

    people like you who put effort in helping others understand things are just great human beings. thanks

  • @Andynath100
    @Andynath100 4 роки тому +5

    Your explanation of conditional probability using the Venn Diagram just blew my mind. So much easier to grasp the topic when you get an intuitive explanation of the topic.

  • @veronikav8436
    @veronikav8436 6 років тому +2

    I watched lots of video on youtube but no one explains as clear then you, now i got conditional probability:) THANKS men

  • @bryonthestingily
    @bryonthestingily 6 років тому +85

    Such high quality content. You have a gift for deepening other human's understanding of this stuff :)

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому +23

      Well, I can't ask for a nicer compliment than that! Thanks so much for the very kind words!

    • @tonynikolaos3527
      @tonynikolaos3527 2 роки тому +2

      @@jbstatistics Indeed, i went through a lot of materiaql on YT- and find your elaborations the most natural, relaxed, intuitive and clear. Kudos! ... and BIG Thanks!

  • @cheezey3295
    @cheezey3295 Рік тому +1

    Failed my probability test. This is one of the best explanations I've seen on this topic.

  • @qulummmdov6572
    @qulummmdov6572 5 років тому +40

    High Quality content, well explained. You sir have my appreciation!

  • @angela2366
    @angela2366 5 років тому +1

    I have struggled and struggled with this and came across your video....wow....I FINALLY have it! Thank you so much!

  • @kousalyadevi5209
    @kousalyadevi5209 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you for taking the effort to explain the statistical concepts intuitively!

  • @exia124578
    @exia124578 7 років тому +6

    I'm having to retake Probability and Statistics this semester after dropping it last and seeing you upload has given me new hope for this semester. Thanks for the great videos man!

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  7 років тому +2

      You are very welcome! I'm not sure how many I'll be able to produce and upload this semester, but I'll see what I can do!

  • @hareemabdulrauf1746
    @hareemabdulrauf1746 3 роки тому +2

    this is the best lecture i have ever attended

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  3 роки тому

      Thanks so much for the kind words!

  • @Kisembobusiness
    @Kisembobusiness 3 роки тому +1

    this is the best explanation of conditional probability ever. I love how the explanation creates a foundation for what independent events are. thank you sir

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you so much for the very kind words!

  • @Cleisthenes2
    @Cleisthenes2 Рік тому +1

    I feel like the probability of me understanding statistics has increased given that I have now watched this video.

  • @foodtips8515
    @foodtips8515 2 роки тому +1

    Your explanations are very good. Real life saver

  • @Luke-nh5tu
    @Luke-nh5tu 4 роки тому +2

    This is by far the best explanation I have seen, the visualisation of the notation applied on diagram is really helpful because it tells you the whole story. Thank you (one more subscriber)

  • @sonwabilecira37
    @sonwabilecira37 4 роки тому

    Hallelujah!
    Thank you. The first video to actually make me understand instead of assuming that the logic of conditional probability is inherent

  • @jorgegonzalez-ec5fl
    @jorgegonzalez-ec5fl Рік тому +1

    Amazing explanation!!! I like that you explain the formula and don’t just tell us to memorize it

  • @alvaromiro2931
    @alvaromiro2931 7 років тому +7

    Cristal clear. I love concepts stepping on top of formulae!!!

  • @BatterflyHigh
    @BatterflyHigh 5 років тому +1

    This is the first time this has ever made sense to me!! Thank you so much!!!!!

  • @roy601912008
    @roy601912008 5 років тому +1

    Thank you so much for making this video! I just started learning statistic on Coursera, but the teacher there makes it complicated and way too difficult to understand. And then I found your video! You are a life saver. Keep up the good job!

  • @Joe-km7xi
    @Joe-km7xi 4 роки тому +1

    This is an amazing video, my professor rushed through this in like 2 minutes. Thank you!

  • @cococnk388
    @cococnk388 2 роки тому +1

    This is what i had at first:
    S= (0,1,10,100)
    A=S1(10,100)
    B=S2(10)
    P(B/A) = P(A n B)/ P(A) = (1/4)/ (2/4)=1/2 =0.5
    What I did above works if an only if they (payouts) do have the same probabilities.... but the probabilities differ according to the payout.
    Thanks alot sir

  • @spicyornot1787
    @spicyornot1787 4 роки тому

    Made perfect sense. Watched several ones before.. but none made it this clear.

  • @niconetz2008
    @niconetz2008 4 роки тому

    I'm 20 years old, i've studied this topic like 4 times and i thought that i had understood it. Now I really understand it

  • @Rsingh1
    @Rsingh1 6 років тому +2

    Out of other videos this is superbest and at the top level because of sooo clear explaination i have imediately subscribed it..... Fabulous... Instead of focusing only on solving Qs through formulae .. Explaination of those is also provided.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому +1

      I'm glad you've found this video helpful!

  • @Lil-lc2di
    @Lil-lc2di 4 роки тому +3

    Thank you this video really helped! I've already watched several videos on the topic but they just confused me more :'). Really appreciated the diagram around 4:30 personally.

  • @onurcam34
    @onurcam34 7 років тому +3

    Thanks a lot for these great videos. I'm learning a lot more than I did in college lectures.

  • @monczokapplehelp
    @monczokapplehelp 7 років тому +3

    Your are the best statistics channel out there, thank you!
    Could you please do a video about equivalence testing? In a world of data sites getting bigger and bigger good old hypothesis tests are not enough anymore

  • @alexmorton5556
    @alexmorton5556 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much! I finally understand the conditional probability formula.

  • @emporia100
    @emporia100 4 роки тому

    The best video for introductory conditional probability!

  • @presmompatigilbert5515
    @presmompatigilbert5515 4 роки тому +1

    I am enjoying this more than I do with my lecture, thank you Sir

  • @rishabhsharma329
    @rishabhsharma329 3 роки тому

    Whatta legend. Helping my masters sail through !

  • @predatox1779
    @predatox1779 5 років тому +1

    I have a prob and stats quiz tomorrow and this helped me immensely! Thank you very much!

  • @sakshichawla8236
    @sakshichawla8236 4 роки тому +1

    This video helped me understand the answer to the question I was looking in all the videos .... thank you

  • @siddhantbajpai5889
    @siddhantbajpai5889 4 роки тому

    The best video on Bayes theorem!
    Kudos to you brother!

  • @Ujamama
    @Ujamama 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you so much for this video! It was really clear and well-explained.

  • @123XTSK
    @123XTSK 4 роки тому

    A High level clarity has been provided....with intuitive values.

  • @machinelearning2578
    @machinelearning2578 3 роки тому

    Most brilliant and super explanation of conditional probability.

  • @ashishprasadverma9428
    @ashishprasadverma9428 3 роки тому

    thankyou soo much , before this i was never able to understand conditional probab

  • @zineddine
    @zineddine 5 років тому +7

    Fantastic! Especially when you said: do me a favour, don’t try to memorize the formula

  • @marcosandoval7260
    @marcosandoval7260 6 років тому

    Great Job!. The best statistics channel on UA-cam!.

  • @marcoventura9451
    @marcoventura9451 5 років тому

    Good content, good explanation. The calmness of te logic before the formulas.

  • @leili1910
    @leili1910 4 роки тому

    it is the best one i have even see explaining the content thank u !

  • @Shumayal
    @Shumayal 6 років тому +1

    That special notice at @4:57 is amazing. Here in the Indian education system unfortunately everything is rote based learning :(

  • @SaadShah1133
    @SaadShah1133 2 роки тому +1

    Great video, i hope this helps me in the quiz today

  • @lynnseto6004
    @lynnseto6004 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for making this video. It is so helpful!!

  • @hammadullahshaikh4735
    @hammadullahshaikh4735 Рік тому

    Good explanation.plz if u have ha time can u explain 6:36 that how p(A) = 5/6 and p(A/B) = 3/4 have relation 5/6 is the probability of {1, 2, 3, 4,5} elements out of six {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} but 3/4 is the probability of {3, 4, 5} elements out of { 2, 4, 5, 6} when we reduced it's sample space .
    Finally I want to ask when we reduced sample space then every element of A is not in reduced sample space

  • @LK-wv3xv
    @LK-wv3xv 5 років тому +1

    this is really probably redundant from other videos but you explained what my math teacher tried to do in two weeks

  • @NoahNathenael-v8n
    @NoahNathenael-v8n 6 місяців тому

    I wish I could touch the like button under this video 1000 times!

  • @ShadrackKimutai
    @ShadrackKimutai 4 роки тому

    Everything Just Clicked... You are amazing

  • @cleanestboi5854
    @cleanestboi5854 5 років тому

    i like that you promote logic and intuitive understanding, its the best way to be prepared if you have a deep understanding

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  5 років тому

      Thanks for the kind words. This is definitely not a "how to" channel -- I try very hard to help students develop a deep understanding of the concepts.

  • @MinhHaNguyen05
    @MinhHaNguyen05 2 роки тому +1

    Hi Jb, great videos like other has joyfully pointed out. I’m a bit confused by the wording of example of rolling a dice at 6:19 tho, would you mind clarifying if you had time please?
    You see the P(A|B) with event A ={1,2,3,4,5,6}, I would interpret it as what is the probability of rolling 1->5 given we have already rolled 3->6. So when the answer is 3/4, which you only took a part that overlap between 2 events, it confuses me a bit.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому +2

      We are given that event B happens. So the number that comes up on the top face is a 3, 4, 5, or 6. That is our reduced sample space, or, in other words, the little universe in which we now reside. So we're sitting in a universe in which the number is a 3, 4, 5, or 6. What is the probability that A occurs if we are in such a universe? Well, there are 4 equally likely possibilities in this universe, and 3 of them (3, 4, and 5) are in A. So P(A|B) = 3/4. (Since A occurs if the number is a 3, 4, or 5, and doesn't occur if the number is a 6. There are no other possibilities.) When we condition on an event, we are taking as a given that it occurs, so our universe reduces down to the universe in which that event occurs.

    • @MinhHaNguyen05
      @MinhHaNguyen05 2 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics oh gosh, that makes so much sense, and so speedy!. I’m sorry if this bothers you because you have already explained it in the “Intro vid for conditional probability”. Thank you JB, big help!
      P/S: Are you coming up with new videos? If you had a course that teaches statistic somewhere, I would totally support it.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому +1

      @@MinhHaNguyen05 You're very welcome. I'm always happy to help when someone is trying and can't understand something. Conditional probability can be a little tricky, and there aren't many others that explain it in the fashion I do (there are some, to be sure, but most folks on youtube know just enough to jam things into the formula so you don't typically get this take). The conditional probability formula is just a formalization of the logic used in this example.
      New videos are always part of the plan. Time for new videos is always another story. I'm currently doing a big rewrite of my notes/text and mapping out in my brain what new videos I'd like to make. I'll likely be able to roll new videos out starting in the summer. I don't have an online course anywhere, other than through my university.
      Thanks for the kind words. I'm happy to be of help.

    • @MinhHaNguyen05
      @MinhHaNguyen05 2 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics you are unbelievably kind! Rooting here to learn more from you, JB!

    • @riahmatic
      @riahmatic Рік тому

      I was confused by this at first as well. Key realization for me was (being rusty on probability) that the event occurs if any of its numbers are rolled, not if all of them are rolled. Doh

  • @sarcastitva
    @sarcastitva 6 років тому

    Sir, believe me, you are God of statistics.

  • @2radix774
    @2radix774 Рік тому

    4:54 BUT why isn't the probability P(A|B) just equal to P(A intersection B)? why do you need to divide it by P(B)?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  Рік тому

      Because "given" means something very different from "and". In the roll of a fair die, the probability of getting a 2 and an even number is 1/6. The probability of getting a 2 *given* it's an even number is 1/3, since we are given the information that the number is a 2, 4, or 6. The probability that a meteorite strikes your house tonight and you die as a result of getting struck by a meteorite is tiny. The probability that you die as a result of a meteorite strike tonight, given a meteorite strikes your house tonight, is pretty high.

    • @2radix774
      @2radix774 Рік тому

      @@jbstatistics ok, I understand that they are different, but why divide by P(B)? how youi go from not knowing the formula to knowing it, and knowing that you have to divide it by P(B), why not by P(A)?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  Рік тому

      @@2radix774 It's from the reduced sample space argument. The sample space has been reduced to B; we know (or are assuming) we are in B. Since B is now our sample space, we need to rescale everything by the probability of B (this will, for example, make the maximum possible conditional probability 1, as it should be).
      Imagine the probabilities are represented by areas in that Venn diagram. If a dart lands randomly in the sample space, what is the probability it lands in A? B? A n B? P(A), P(B), P(A n B), respectively. Now, if we have the information that the dart landed randomly in region B, what is the probability that dart is also sitting in A?
      Look at the example I started off with, P(2|Even) when rolling a fair six-sided die. Intuitively, we can see that this conditional probability is 1/3, right? What gets us there, in terms of P(2), P(even), and the probability of their intersection? It’s definitely not P(2 n Even)/P(2), as that turns out to 1 and we know that’s not correct. P(2 n Even)/P(Even) gets us what we know to be the correct value.

  • @shirshak6738
    @shirshak6738 5 років тому

    i never swear but u are fucking awesome. I never understood this formula. I watched like 1000 video from making tree to everything. Now i can say i understand this formula. Thanks a lot. If i havent watched this video i wonder how many year i would have struggled

  • @miguelfonseca1104
    @miguelfonseca1104 4 роки тому

    you did well, the division part of the conditional probability really threw me off, but the way you explain just made me realize in non-conditional probability, the probability in a sense has a denominator of 1 which signifies "from the whole sample space", when you add given, you must divide to specify its a part of which (partial whole). Thank you. Other videos dont make that clear.

  • @Thobanatif
    @Thobanatif 4 роки тому +1

    If i was able, I would definitely give this person a, "NOBEL PRIZE" 🏆🏆🏆

  • @jaja22-11
    @jaja22-11 Рік тому

    This is amazing. Thanks for sharing.

  • @firstkaransingh
    @firstkaransingh 3 роки тому

    Please... Please... Do Bayes theorem . It's a critical follow up on conditional probability.

  • @samsungandandroidguy9796
    @samsungandandroidguy9796 Рік тому

    Thank God for your channel !

  • @benjaminhowe8825
    @benjaminhowe8825 7 років тому +3

    Hey I’ve watched a few of your playlists and am just writing this to ask you a general question. What’s the best way to learn statistics stuff in r? I’m an actuarial student I’ve done statistics but I’m just unsure what the best way to learn r. Any advice would be most appreciated

  • @ghadiermatariek8955
    @ghadiermatariek8955 4 роки тому

    Awesome really, the best tutorial about the topic

  • @hookem3768
    @hookem3768 4 роки тому

    Why does Conditional Probability divide by the given event, but not subtract?
    When you describe Conditional Probability with the Ven Diagram, my thought about subtracting event B is reinforced. It seems like I would get the same answer by subtracting.

  • @fannyfan663
    @fannyfan663 3 роки тому

    So hight quality cours. Thanks alot!

  • @wardalafef5705
    @wardalafef5705 Рік тому

    in the red jacks example why aren't we saying that the probability of drawing a jack givin that the card is red would be : (1/13)/(1/2) wouldn't that be the correct representation of the conditional probability law the probability of the intersection 1/13 over the prob of the card being red 1/2 ? can you please explain.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  Рік тому

      The probability of getting a red jack is 2/52 = 1/26, not 1/13. The intersection of "the card is red" and "the card is a jack" is "the card is a red jack".

  • @quantabot1165
    @quantabot1165 4 роки тому

    finally found the right Channel,

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  4 роки тому +1

      I've been waiting!

    • @quantabot1165
      @quantabot1165 4 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics O wow, I thought You dont post videos anymore, I was sad to see your last video 1 year ago I thought maybe he left youtube, Now Im happy cause you are still here, probably you're busy with life thats why no new videos

  • @spectator5144
    @spectator5144 2 роки тому

    your videos are really good. great job!

  • @aditishikha8149
    @aditishikha8149 4 роки тому

    Great work sir. Keep going👍

  • @mxkep
    @mxkep 6 років тому

    Great videos. I wish I found your page earlier in the semester.

  • @arostudycircle5222
    @arostudycircle5222 4 роки тому

    great things sir. which software are you using for this video

  • @spectator5144
    @spectator5144 2 роки тому

    how to calc. the jack example by using the formula? i have P(J and R)/P(R), which yields 2/13. why is it wrong? thanks

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому

      There are 2 cards that are both a jack and red (the jack of hearts and jack of diamonds). P(J and R) = 2/52. P(R) = 26/52. P(J and R)/P(R) = (2/52)/(26/52) = 2/26 = 1/13.

  • @vatsal_gamit
    @vatsal_gamit 4 роки тому +1

    Can anyone explain me why he took p(A)=0.010 instead 0.009 at 9.23???

  • @L2.Lagrange
    @L2.Lagrange 2 роки тому

    Very helpful statistics videos

  • @ayanlodh6485
    @ayanlodh6485 6 років тому +1

    It's a really helpful thank you very much for this video 👍👌

  • @Rsingh1
    @Rsingh1 6 років тому +1

    Absolutely clear explanation

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому +1

      Thanks!

    • @Rsingh1
      @Rsingh1 6 років тому

      jbstatistics is there any video on multiplication theorem of probability

  • @levonkhojoyan6402
    @levonkhojoyan6402 6 років тому +1

    thank you so much,,your videos are very helpful
    ,,,,it would be nice if you create a playlist Probability theory for Machine Learning

  • @florentinosanchez3969
    @florentinosanchez3969 10 місяців тому

    REALLY NICE VIDEO. THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!

  • @loganbhamidipaty7279
    @loganbhamidipaty7279 3 роки тому

    This video is amazing!

  • @racinerobinson
    @racinerobinson 3 роки тому

    wouldn't the payout is more than $1 be event B as it is the 'given that' condition?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  3 роки тому

      A and B are just arbitrary labels on the events; it doesn't matter which event is called A and which is called B.

  • @shis10
    @shis10 5 років тому

    Excellent. Very helpful video

  • @keotshepilemandona9882
    @keotshepilemandona9882 6 років тому +2

    when i hear that voice i know that i will be productive......i didnt know that u have videos for conditional probability. i have 3 months strugling

  • @vd0321
    @vd0321 5 років тому

    Awesome explanation... Thank you

  • @nethrabhupathi5691
    @nethrabhupathi5691 5 років тому

    nice, very precise n clear. helpful video

  • @weiqiaocheng9185
    @weiqiaocheng9185 2 роки тому

    Hi there, is there a video on conditional random variable? I'm very lost on that particular topic when trying to understand the subject

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому

      I don't have a video on conditional random variables yet. There are likely some on UA-cam, but I haven't looked and I don't know of any.

    • @weiqiaocheng9185
      @weiqiaocheng9185 2 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics I did try watching the other videos, but theirs were not as sweet, short and concise as yours was :(

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому

      @@weiqiaocheng9185 I believe you :)

    • @weiqiaocheng9185
      @weiqiaocheng9185 2 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics is it possible to ask you questions? Maybe through an email or something? 😅

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому

      @@weiqiaocheng9185 No. I sometimes answer questions here if they're directly related to the videos, but I don't have time to offer general help.

  • @pisanghangus2
    @pisanghangus2 5 років тому

    thank you . can you make tutorial on other subject of math like calculus / geometry ?

  • @vaibhavrane8259
    @vaibhavrane8259 4 роки тому

    can anyone tell me how this gentlemen has calculated the value of P(A) in the second example, please can anyone tell me? how that value of 0.010 has came up as P(A)?
    please

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  4 роки тому +1

      I define event A to be the event the person wins more than $1. There are two amounts greater than $1: $10 and $100. Winning $10 and winning $100 are mutually exclusive events, where their individual probabilities are given as 0.009 and 0.001. The probability of winning more than $1, or, in other words, winning $10 or $100, is the sum of those two probabilities.

    • @vaibhavrane8259
      @vaibhavrane8259 4 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics get it thank you 👍🏽😎

  • @mehrosenasir3966
    @mehrosenasir3966 5 років тому

    p(b) must be greater than to zero, but when you said that the event in the denominator has already occurred and there is no chance of occurring it then why the P(b) >0 and not equal to zero.

  • @darshanrs491
    @darshanrs491 5 років тому

    In the formula why we have to divide p(b).... please answer to this question

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  5 років тому

      I go through a detailed explanation of that as best as I am capable of, using a variety of different approaches, including the Venn diagram representation around the 4:00 mark. I can't possibly do any better than that in a text response.

  • @akanksha7474
    @akanksha7474 4 роки тому

    Awesome video! Thanks

  • @consolejehong1258
    @consolejehong1258 5 років тому

    ty!! i understand where the formula comes from now!

  • @saichaitanyamaths8234
    @saichaitanyamaths8234 3 роки тому

    Sir you explained well,but what is mean that payout?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  3 роки тому +1

      The payout is the amount of money you receive. In the example, you get $1 back with probability 0.301, $10 with probability 0.009, and $100 with probability 0.001. "Payout" has a similar meaning to "winnings" here, but I didn't want to use that word as then there would be some ambiguity as to whether your original $1 purchase price was included in that.

    • @saichaitanyamaths8234
      @saichaitanyamaths8234 3 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics I understood sir thank you somuch 😊😊 ,by your explanation I understood sir ,you explanation is great and you explained my doubt too😊😊,I watched many videos but I not understood by them but you explained well sir,I'm new subscriber 😊,once again thank u so much sir🙏🙏🙏😊

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  3 роки тому

      @@saichaitanyamaths8234 You are very welcome!

    • @saichaitanyamaths8234
      @saichaitanyamaths8234 3 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics ❤❤❤

  • @richardadamwais9734
    @richardadamwais9734 4 роки тому

    who else watch this incredible video in covid19 pandemic that has ruied our daily school

  • @nkasecarter6295
    @nkasecarter6295 5 років тому

    Thanks for your video, this is awesome

  • @ramniwasswami5554
    @ramniwasswami5554 5 років тому

    Very nice vdeos in probability

  • @giovannicarmona1050
    @giovannicarmona1050 6 років тому +1

    I Love You