Is quantum computing overhyped? Leave your thoughts in the comments. To watch the full talk, head to iai.tv/video/the-truth-about-quantum-computing?UA-cam&
REALLY ANNOYING. You don’t find out til the end of this clip that the actual talk is NOT HERE. Went to your link to hear the actual talk and of course it is broken and wants you to register, sign up, something but why would you? Trust already broken
I really like how he’s able to explain this difficult topic in a simple way! I instantly like him, such a smart and friendly person! Could listen for hours! 👌👍
it's still very stochastic yoo hoo woo uncertainty physical mystification and idealistic notion of forces. The very common factory workers in anything precision machining scraps a part invokes hidden variables and moves on when Cos/ sin A cutting speed & B feed rates fail even though it has no explanation why. Its stressful on our approximate formulism so we make up excuses of environment, molecular structures & bonds or thermodynamical systems. We don't send it back up the chain of comand to say your equations are wrong . Sigma 6 testable repeatable peer review is ran a few times maybe tested enough to name it even if it can't become a profitable excersize
Its just an Intellectual step singular , A richard finneman logic specific question about steam engine1 textualized, factory step2 method 3 specific objective prediction industrial revolution = new market eqaul measure. Qauntom compute new market imput justified output freeing servitude . Profit $ input paid for family freedom output
About what Scott say's at 8:15 so if only one slit is open and the amplitude is only negative what does that mean? So we take get the probability - we first let the amplitudes interact and then take the square of the result? Or if only positive or only negative is present - after taking the square it will give be positive even if the amplitude was negative?
Approximating complex systems and simplifying it into intellectual bits and pieces like artificial intellectualism would be much better in a more fludlike dynamical lattus structure and body but that's not what the qauntom key #2 to the cosmos is. Its still a stochastic approach on the bottom end of order. One good step specific like Richard finneman logic , we asked about steam engine textualized, then factory tested method , specific prediction industrial revolution = new market eqaul measure that how justfied freeing the servitude and created a specific profit to buy one family freedom, then one tribe ,then entire nations. In this factory cos/sin equations A of cutting speed vs B feed of cut in materials work perfectly but once you add A & b together it's no reason why it fails so we scrap parts & invoke hidden variables then fabricate profitable solutions without wasting the time of pushing the equation back up to educators who don't work but one repetition or so which is good enough to throw a sigma 6 on. It works enough but you are witnessing the exact same behavior on classical scaled epochs orders of magnitude larger more ordered. As a tool & die precision machinest useing the ultimate precision instrument ✝️ xyx man made time hierarchy knowledge of good evil equations Your dealing in it everyday its no yoo hoo woo that's just making up excuses to try and preserve top down form & shape.. ignoring frame of reference space/motion Is 1 body cresting a 4 body problem not a 3 body solution triangulated measure that's both a blessing and a curse.
@@DonG-1949< butthurt much ? Now why would a common everyday individuals intelligence be upset over gaining the ability to maintain full knowledge about any frame of reference your heart desires? You don't want to be the owner of artificial intellectual property ? Or is it that we can never reach the astronomical energy density required to build out intelligence that hurts your feelings? Eltrodynamical defibrillator of life encoded blueprint is but one of many perfect alignments required but we do have alot of molecular structure down . Anthrosphy cults get all butthurt about this also. Maybe that's your sensitivities here..
Об интеллектуальных поисках квантовых компьютерщиков при помощи Сферы Блоха. На мой арифметически простой взгляд, Сфера Блоха - это *не* физический объект. Можно сказать, что это условное вспомогательное мнемоническое представление о характере взаимодействия физических объектов. Природа не оперирует в соответствии с подобными трансцендентными представлениями. Поэтому на их основе невозможно строить логически правильные умозаключения о практической реализации этих представлений. 14.09.2024.
На интуитивном уровне предполагаю, что Природа оперирует квантовыми процессами в первую очередь в соответствии с симметричными кристаллографическими соотношениями. 14.09.2024.
It was a nice lecture about Quantum computing. I think Mathematics without Quantum Physics is like empty box. Quantum Mechanics interact with Mathematics to make It up in a beautiful way. It took Terence Howard 36 pages to prove that 1×1=2 either. Maybe 1+1=2, and 1×1=2 simultaneously in 2 different states at same time which is a beautiful example of Quantum Mechanics in Mathematics. In this case 1×1=2 or A×B=ab^2. Great Albert Einstein also calculated 3 English Alphabets to build the most beautiful equation of all time E=mc^2, that Scientists used It to detect Neutrinos and to build Nuclear Fusion. I love to learn Philosophy of Quantum Physics from Great Minds.
Scott Aaronson is incredibly talented! And his sense of humour defeats any attempt of a theoretical explanation. It would be nice to find generous sponsors, so this outstanding content can be made available for everybody.
so tired of these IAI advertorials for their subscription service.. there are plenty of other descriptions of this/these topic(s) online what's so special about yours that you feelk you have to basically cheat your audience? do you not understand that even 1 full video would be a much more effective marketing tool for the quality of your content than any number of videos that cutoff just as the content is about to discuss anything meaningful?
Is quantum computing overhyped? Leave your thoughts in the comments.
To watch the full talk, head to iai.tv/video/the-truth-about-quantum-computing?UA-cam&
REALLY ANNOYING. You don’t find out til the end of this clip that the actual talk is NOT HERE. Went to your link to hear the actual talk and of course it is broken and wants you to register, sign up, something but why would you? Trust already broken
Really terrible for an "Institute of Art and Ideas"...
I agree, this is a waste of time. I clicked the 3 dots under the video thumbnail and chose: don't recommend this channel.
@@rdubeau imagine your disappointment ! 😆🤣😂
THeir shitty IAI site is a scam
I tried watching the full video but your website is broken AF. I can’t sign up for a free trial
I really like how he’s able to explain this difficult topic in a simple way! I instantly like him, such a smart and friendly person! Could listen for hours! 👌👍
Hands down the best explanation I've ever seen not just for Quantum Computers, but also Quantum Mechanics.
it's still very stochastic yoo hoo woo uncertainty physical mystification and idealistic notion of forces.
The very common factory workers in anything precision machining scraps a part invokes hidden variables and moves on when Cos/ sin A cutting speed & B feed rates fail even though it has no explanation why.
Its stressful on our approximate formulism so we make up excuses of environment, molecular structures & bonds or thermodynamical systems.
We don't send it back up the chain of comand to say your equations are wrong .
Sigma 6 testable repeatable peer review is ran a few times maybe tested enough to name it even if it can't become a profitable excersize
Its just an Intellectual step singular ,
A richard finneman logic specific question about steam engine1 textualized, factory step2 method 3 specific objective prediction industrial revolution = new market eqaul measure.
Qauntom compute new market imput justified output freeing servitude .
Profit $ input paid for family freedom output
because he didnt actually explain quantum mechanics
Scott is the best. I kind of want to buy him a belt.
LOL
About what Scott say's at 8:15 so if only one slit is open and the amplitude is only negative what does that mean? So we take get the probability - we first let the amplitudes interact and then take the square of the result? Or if only positive or only negative is present - after taking the square it will give be positive even if the amplitude was negative?
This is actually very well explained!
Quantum computers sounds more like sci-fi than science.
@@JarkkoToivonen so did the internet
Believe what you want
That’s sweet! Feel free to reach out.
THE BEST 😮
Say uh one more time bleep bleep 😂
Bleep
Approximating complex systems and simplifying it into intellectual bits and pieces like artificial intellectualism would be much better in a more fludlike dynamical lattus structure and body but that's not what the qauntom key #2 to the cosmos is. Its still a stochastic approach on the bottom end of order.
One good step specific like Richard finneman logic , we asked about steam engine textualized, then factory tested method , specific prediction industrial revolution = new market eqaul measure that how justfied freeing the servitude and created a specific profit to buy one family freedom, then one tribe ,then entire nations.
In this factory cos/sin equations A of cutting speed vs B feed of cut in materials work perfectly but once you add A & b together it's no reason why it fails so we scrap parts & invoke hidden variables then fabricate profitable solutions without wasting the time of pushing the equation back up to educators who don't work but one repetition or so which is good enough to throw a sigma 6 on.
It works enough but you are witnessing the exact same behavior on classical scaled epochs orders of magnitude larger more ordered.
As a tool & die precision machinest useing the ultimate precision instrument ✝️ xyx man made time hierarchy knowledge of good evil equations
Your dealing in it everyday its no yoo hoo woo that's just making up excuses to try and preserve top down form & shape.. ignoring frame of reference space/motion Is 1 body cresting a 4 body problem not a 3 body solution triangulated measure that's both a blessing and a curse.
quality schizopost
@@DonG-1949< butthurt much ?
Now why would a common everyday individuals intelligence be upset over gaining the ability to maintain full knowledge about any frame of reference your heart desires?
You don't want to be the owner of artificial intellectual property ?
Or is it that we can never reach the astronomical energy density required to build out intelligence that hurts your feelings?
Eltrodynamical defibrillator of life encoded blueprint is but one of many perfect alignments required but we do have alot of molecular structure down .
Anthrosphy cults get all butthurt about this also. Maybe that's your sensitivities here..
Об интеллектуальных поисках квантовых компьютерщиков при помощи Сферы Блоха.
На мой арифметически простой взгляд, Сфера Блоха - это *не* физический объект. Можно сказать, что это условное вспомогательное мнемоническое представление о характере взаимодействия физических объектов. Природа не оперирует в соответствии с подобными трансцендентными представлениями. Поэтому на их основе невозможно строить логически правильные умозаключения о практической реализации этих представлений.
14.09.2024.
На интуитивном уровне предполагаю, что Природа оперирует квантовыми процессами в первую очередь в соответствии с симметричными кристаллографическими соотношениями.
14.09.2024.
It was a nice lecture about Quantum computing.
I think Mathematics without Quantum Physics is like empty box. Quantum Mechanics interact with Mathematics to make It up in a beautiful way.
It took Terence Howard 36 pages to prove that 1×1=2 either.
Maybe 1+1=2, and 1×1=2 simultaneously in 2 different states at same time which is a beautiful example of Quantum Mechanics in Mathematics.
In this case 1×1=2 or A×B=ab^2.
Great Albert Einstein also calculated 3 English Alphabets to build the most beautiful equation of all time E=mc^2, that Scientists used It to detect Neutrinos and to build Nuclear Fusion.
I love to learn Philosophy of Quantum Physics from Great Minds.
Shouldn't have to pay a website to watch Educational videos like this..
Scott Aaronson is incredibly talented! And his sense of humour defeats any attempt of a theoretical explanation. It would be nice to find generous sponsors, so this outstanding content can be made available for everybody.
They can cost lots of money to produce. Who is going to fund this idealistic situation?
so tired of these IAI advertorials for their subscription service.. there are plenty of other descriptions of this/these topic(s) online what's so special about yours that you feelk you have to basically cheat your audience? do you not understand that even 1 full video would be a much more effective marketing tool for the quality of your content than any number of videos that cutoff just as the content is about to discuss anything meaningful?
It takes political correctness and irony to explain time travel💀
There is no Quantum Computing. There is only "what if..."
Who controls the quantum? Nature is controlled since its made by it. There has to be something who created it.
Content behind PAYWALL - I'm sure Scott Aaronson does not appreciate your shady click bait tactics
Still lots of good stuff available here. Which they've kindly made available on YT.
Another Jewish hustler