The Scary Way US Navy Sinks its Own Billion $ Ships in Middle of Ocean

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 бер 2023
  • Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about where US Navy ships and submarines go after they’re no longer fit for duty.
    Fluctus is a website and UA-cam channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
    We publish 3 videos a week on our UA-cam channel and many more articles on our website.
    Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
    Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
    / fluctusofficial
    Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
    To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 236

  • @user-ty5ed2pf6b
    @user-ty5ed2pf6b 5 місяців тому +4

    The three ships that I served on are luckily still active duty and will be for decades more (USS Essex LHD-2, USS Momsen DDG-92 and USS Halsey DDG-97). The ships sunk in the various RIMPAC SINKEX's are in tens of thousands of feet of water, there are very few fish and no corral at those depths!

  • @chipps1066
    @chipps1066 Рік тому +8

    The training is invaluable,works for me.

  • @marksauck3399
    @marksauck3399 Рік тому +7

    I was so happy they made my ship a floating museum and large numbers of people see it everyday. I have a personal reason for this because I have my painted murals on the ship that I did 50 years ago.

    • @jimbobsable
      @jimbobsable 11 місяців тому

      Thank you for doing such an awesome job painting them. That's quite a pat on the back knowing that they kept those murals displayed for all those decades.

  • @Tomcatntbird
    @Tomcatntbird Рік тому +10

    I was in the US Navy for 8 years. My first and third ship were used as target practice. USS Guam LPH9 and the Peterson DD 969.

  • @moparsquid
    @moparsquid Рік тому +8

    The USS RACINE LST 1191 was my first ship 79 to 81 it was very hard to see her go down so unceremoniously

  • @mccoybyz1099
    @mccoybyz1099 Рік тому +37

    Fun fact - the US navy maintains a 50,000 acre forest in Indiana named Constitution Grove comprised of white oak specifically and exclusively for the maintaining of the USS Constitution! Pretty crazy, right!

    • @steven4315
      @steven4315 Рік тому +6

      Crane is a beautiful base. Hundred square miles of mostly forest. Until 9/11 it would host annual bike rides on it's traffic free paved roads.

    • @mikepainter3111
      @mikepainter3111 Рік тому +5

      Yes especially since our current government doesn’t try to follow it!!

    • @mccoybyz1099
      @mccoybyz1099 Рік тому +3

      @@mikepainter3111 what?!

    • @greggweber9967
      @greggweber9967 Рік тому +1

      ​@@mccoybyz1099 Obvious to me. Sorry.

    • @Canthus13
      @Canthus13 Рік тому

      @@mccoybyz1099 He's whining because he perceives some sort of civil rights violations by the current administration while simultaneously seeing no issue with the blatant violations by the previous one. He's a melty little snowflake and is probably mad about his gay beer.

  • @Canthus13
    @Canthus13 Рік тому +12

    What's crazy is just how hard it is to sink a naval vessel.

    • @moosefromsky3986
      @moosefromsky3986 Рік тому +2

      Look up the USS Nevada, it took two atomic bombs like a champ and still didn't sink.

    • @Canthus13
      @Canthus13 Рік тому +2

      @@moosefromsky3986 Exactly what I'm referring to. My grandfather was at bikini and talked about how a nuke couldn't sink many of the ships on the first try

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому +2

      Yes my ship took everything they had and it sunk in the night!!!

  • @samuelschick8813
    @samuelschick8813 Рік тому +4

    Correction about the U.S.S. Rancine. A Newport class LST is not heavely armored ship. It is a thin skinned ship. I was on LST 1189 for 3.5 years and Newport class LSTs do not have armor.

  • @Bob-xg8eq
    @Bob-xg8eq Рік тому +28

    The first ship at 3:37 was the USS McClusky (FFG-41), and the second ship at 4:29 was the USNS Kilauea (T-AE-26), I served on both during my Naval career and it's kind of sad to see them go that way.

    • @sailorddg9877
      @sailorddg9877 Рік тому +2

      Yes, the Kilauea. Did several ammo unreps with her and the glorious mail call.

    • @kevint2555
      @kevint2555 Рік тому +2

      They did the same thing to the USS Acadia, very sad to see them go

    • @reptar69
      @reptar69 Рік тому +2

      If you're serious that is awesome! Also thank you for your service.

    • @josephpadula2283
      @josephpadula2283 Рік тому +3

      Better to go down helping training and intact rather than getting cut up to pieces as scrap !

    • @user-pq7ym7cd5l
      @user-pq7ym7cd5l Рік тому

      @@josephpadula2283 maybe the U.S. Navy has many retired warships that are more suitable for training naval personnel

  • @RealMTBAddict
    @RealMTBAddict Рік тому +66

    Plays better at 1.25 speed.

    • @colesherman6849
      @colesherman6849 Рік тому +2

      it actually is kinda nice!! love the videos just would like to seem em sped up a bit

    • @UnicornMeat512
      @UnicornMeat512 Рік тому +1

      Thanks 😂

    • @tiltonevans8901
      @tiltonevans8901 Рік тому +1

      u the goat for this

    • @RealMTBAddict
      @RealMTBAddict Рік тому

      @@tiltonevans8901 thanks G

    • @tuitutgshab
      @tuitutgshab Рік тому

      @@colesherman6849 ឹាសងាាាាាាសាាាសងសាសាសសាសឹឆាឆាឆាឆាសាសាឆាាាាាាឹាាឹាាសាសសាសាសាស្តាសេដេសងេសដដេតងដដងងងងងងសដដដាាាាសសសសសសសសសសសសសាសសសសសៃដាសសសសសដដាសសរៃសាសសអៃដដដដងដដដដងដាំឃអងងអេះវឋវឍវវវវឌអឌអឌអអអឍខដវងងងឋ

  • @hardworkerforlife4081
    @hardworkerforlife4081 Рік тому +3

    Remember if you work hard 40 plus hours a week it'll pay off in the long run.

  • @TheWorldsGreatest024
    @TheWorldsGreatest024 Рік тому +6

    so they talk about pollution and global warming but still sink ships on purpose in the sea lmfao the irony

    • @qwertyuhi8221
      @qwertyuhi8221 Рік тому +1

      What does that have to do with anything

    • @tychos872
      @tychos872 Рік тому +1

      Please educate yourself on ways people are building artificial reefs. This is done the world round and is proven to help marine life. The navy just adds the step of getting an real world fire exercise out of it.

    • @charlesosbun3642
      @charlesosbun3642 Рік тому

      Sunken ship can serve as underwater marine habitat!

    • @TheWorldsGreatest024
      @TheWorldsGreatest024 Рік тому

      Y’all believe everything y’all read?

    • @tychos872
      @tychos872 Рік тому

      There are hundreds of articles about ships purposely sunk to build marine habitats. From all over the spectrum of sources. So pull your head out and look around.

  • @SupTim1
    @SupTim1 Рік тому +4

    No wonder fish are full of heavy metals

  • @ankitagrawal4979
    @ankitagrawal4979 Рік тому +4

    Why can't this be recycled???
    rather than just polluting the waters!!!!!

    • @XVNRX
      @XVNRX 10 місяців тому +1

      It’s not pollution
      The sea life benefit from it

  • @1XX1
    @1XX1 Рік тому +5

    Gotta Love The Navy's LCS's! Great big jet-skis which would be more appropriately named the "YUGO of the Seven Seas."

  • @Tonetwisters
    @Tonetwisters Рік тому +18

    In the early 1950's, the US NAVY was smart enough to mothball their ships way up a river that was close to me. It was really cool to drive by them on the way to a fun day, and see all that gray floating close to shore. They don't seem to be smart enough to do that now. Sinking them is a waste of a lot of steel, in my humble opinion. And you never know when 1/2 your fleet will be bombed into oblivion as they were somewhere in Hawaii once upon a crime ...

    • @andyhastings5950
      @andyhastings5950 Рік тому

      If you'll do a bit of research on the Reserve Fleet and how it works I'll be glad to trade comments. In the mean time you sound like a fool

    • @ajobdunwell2585
      @ajobdunwell2585 Рік тому +2

      They still have a lot of ships mothballed. The sinking gives a chance for live fire exercise.. they also do less exciting sinkings to form artificial reefs. I don't think the later are combat ships tho.

    • @jamesplymire5342
      @jamesplymire5342 Рік тому +4

      They create training exercises and reefs for marine life, not "stupid" at all.

    • @objuan6
      @objuan6 Рік тому +2

      Things that aren’t used go to pieces even faster than when they are used.

    • @andyhastings5950
      @andyhastings5950 Рік тому

      @@ajobdunwell2585 the US Navy has dramatically reduced it's stock of Mothball fleet. Do a Google search for locations of these storage location. Then use Google Earth and look at them.
      Secondly, The Navy has Reef-Exed ships. It is extreamly expensive to do so. The Oriskany wood deck covering cost several million dollors to clear EPA mandated hazardous material. The reason
      this particular ship needed the deck removal was that it was saturated with PCBs. For a sink-Ex the requirements are considerably less. The Oriskany had to have all asbestos removed for the same reason.
      In the last several decades the Navy hasn't even tried to Reef-Ex any other ship, this applies to All ships even cargo ships.

  • @Agent77X
    @Agent77X Рік тому +5

    It is much cheaper to sink a ship then to scrap it for metal and parts!😮

  • @carlcantrell4781
    @carlcantrell4781 Рік тому +7

    There are 2 things about this. 1) it shows the crews how hard it is to sink their ships and 2) shows how hard it is for the weapons to sink other ships so they better shoot straight.

    • @gilbertnadeau7181
      @gilbertnadeau7181 Рік тому +2

      They are empty, no fuel, no explosives, so of course they hard to sink.

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому +1

      Also a manned ship would be a moving Target and it would be fighting back!!!

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

      @@gilbertnadeau7181 The fuel and bombs are in armored places on the ship and they won't go off anyway from being hit by missiles and bombs!!!

    • @gilbertnadeau7181
      @gilbertnadeau7181 Рік тому

      @Kirk Kirkland, that is a bit of bullshit. Many examples of ships who's magazines have blown up after the ship took hits.

  • @kyles5513
    @kyles5513 Рік тому +2

    Can't salvage all that metal to reuse for other shit?

  • @jimw1615
    @jimw1615 Рік тому +1

    I went aboard the USS Racine in 1974 for an Amtrac landing exercise off Camp Lejeune. I must be getting old. We are all "going down". Some sooner than others.

  • @astronorthwet636
    @astronorthwet636 Рік тому +1

    Not going to be an artificial reef at 15,000 feet.😅 Hardly a living thing at that depth.

  • @atinoteintunovas9969
    @atinoteintunovas9969 Рік тому +2

    Is a wonderful experience to see all of these equipment Commision or Decommission! No matter what is always a great experience. Thanks!!!

  • @johnpritchard5410
    @johnpritchard5410 Рік тому +4

    I served aboard Flint (AE-32) and Gray (FF-1054). Both went for flatware and razorblades in TX.

    • @KevinS3928
      @KevinS3928 Рік тому +2

      I was on they Grey, I'm going to have to quit watching these videos, they're depressing the shit of me!😢

    • @michaelb.8953
      @michaelb.8953 Рік тому +3

      Haven't heard the name of the USS Flint in a long time as I was quite familiar with that ship. I was on the USS Mount Hood (AE-29) it's sister ship as some of my A school classmates went to the Flint. My son is currently on the USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) in Jacksonville, FL and his twin sister is on the USS Harry Truman (CVN-75) Norfolk, VA. My son gave me a tour of his ship fairly recently and it was quite an enjoyable experience. Have yet to tour my daughter's ship as its been in the yards for awhile and then was on deployment for almost 10 months last year, hopefully this year I'll get that tour.

    • @johnpritchard5410
      @johnpritchard5410 Рік тому

      @@michaelb.8953 Michael, was Mount Hood an East Coast ship? I'm about ten miles from the tidal area of the ex-NWS Concord, now run by the army. Flint was out of Concord. All the AEs went to MSC. Flint was scrapped about ten years back in south TX.

    • @michaelb.8953
      @michaelb.8953 Рік тому +2

      @@johnpritchard5410 Mount Hood was home ported out of Concord, CA and scraped in Texas in 2012.

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

      I'm glad that mine is on the bottom of the ocean!!! USS BADGER FF 1071!!!

  • @onlythaclonessir2525
    @onlythaclonessir2525 Рік тому +2

    I AM REALLY BOTH PISSED AND SCARED

  • @robertoguerra8143
    @robertoguerra8143 Рік тому +1

    No quiere que nadie copie su inteligencia poreso es el número 1 en el mundo Dios bendiga a América.

  • @steveamiaga2327
    @steveamiaga2327 Рік тому +10

    USS Constitution doesn't "move around the country" except to flip it around every year so it weathers evenly... Other than that, it's permanently in Boston.

    • @RealMTBAddict
      @RealMTBAddict Рік тому +2

      True. I've never heard that before lol

    • @marioncobaretti2280
      @marioncobaretti2280 Рік тому +3

      Its true I've lived in the area for years. They take it out about 8 miles just outside the harbor turn it around and return. I've been on it back in the 70,s. The lower deck were the cannons are is about 5 1/2 ft. High. People were so small back then. Most avg men stood 5 ft tall in the 1800,s. Must of been the same in the 1700,s. Boat was called iron sides because it was covered in copper sheeting over the white oak and the cannon balls would bounce off it

  • @lancecharlson6935
    @lancecharlson6935 8 місяців тому

    Crew members are warriors and warriors are a special breed. The men and women under command are a special piece of the whole. Each sailor warrior needs to polish their skills to maintain the edge required of a part of a team. The team is only as strong as it’s weakest part. Each warrior must no only sharpen their edge but the edge of fellow warriors. The cook is first a warrior and second a cook. The sonar operator is a warrior first and always, even when scrubbing a toilet! No one is less a member of the whole no matter the task assigned! When a warrior first and always the task assigned is secondary but no less significant. When the toilet doesn’t work the warrior who’s job is to fix toilets becomes a significantly important warrior!
    When trained to be a warrior first and always a warrior they are no matter what task they are assigned. No one is any more or less important than the next, just a different task! A warrior is trained to be a fighter first and always. Their task is to be the best warrior they can be. One of the missions of a warrior is to master whatever task assigned. The ship’s clergyman is every bit the warrior as the sailor who’s job is running a weapon system. You see, being a warrior and maintaining a warrior mind set is simple, be the best you can be no matter what you are doing! The warrior mindset is not just an attribute of a combatant, it’s a mindset that transcends all tasks. You can be an expert in any assignment but if not a warrior first and always, your expertise and expert qualifications will fail to rise when it’s needed. It’s the warrior in your heart that will take through the storm and survive as well as assure the survival of all the warriors you fight with! Being a warrior is a mindset that applies to all and all a warrior may be assigned to do! Serve, sacrifice, fight with all you are, only scratches the surface of a true warrior. A warriors heart is the driving force each warrior reaches into when the going gets tough! The warrior gets going!

  • @BdogFinal14
    @BdogFinal14 18 днів тому

    The training benefit from the SINKEX exercises are invaluable to our Navy crews.

  • @seangelarden9543
    @seangelarden9543 Рік тому +5

    Was feeling bad my ship was sold for scrap and a buddy pulled up pictures of his ship being shot to pieces, RIP FID

    • @samuelschick8813
      @samuelschick8813 Рік тому +1

      My first ship ( LST 1189) was given to Chile, then scrapped due to damage. My second ship ( BB 63 ) now sits in Pearl Harbor. Gotta love how he said LSTs were heavely armored. LOL

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

      I'd much rather have my ship on the bottom then made into razor blades!!!
      She will always be there!!!

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

      @@samuelschick8813 How lucky to have been on the Mighty Mo!!
      That would have been a fantastic experience!!!
      It's to bad they still aren't sailing the oceans!!!

  • @RetiredSailor60
    @RetiredSailor60 Рік тому +1

    My 3rd ship, USS Kinkaid DD 965, was used as a target in 2004. I toured USS Constitution in 2001 and USS Wisconsin in 2003.

  • @22SAMURAJ
    @22SAMURAJ Рік тому +1

    I'm just love these kind of movie's 😊

  • @kirkkirkland7244
    @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

    My ship the USS BADGER FF 1071 ended up being a target ship and I'm glad it's on the bottom of the ocean instead of being scraped!!!
    GO NAVY!!!!

  • @jamesplymire5342
    @jamesplymire5342 Рік тому +2

    I'd love to work at a dry dock.

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

      I'd love to be back in the Navy but they won't take a 63 year old man!!!

  • @orgorg239
    @orgorg239 Рік тому +4

    Sometimes they sell them to lesser nations.

  • @jamesmoore3694
    @jamesmoore3694 Рік тому +3

    we can build ships, and but we cant build housing for the people who paid for them

  • @KawsarAhmedVlogs1
    @KawsarAhmedVlogs1 Рік тому +2

    Why can't this be recycled???

    • @tychos872
      @tychos872 Рік тому

      Did you not watch the full thing? Recycle when its worthwhile and when its not use the hulls for helping build artificial reefs after they get gutted, cleaned and towed out. And of course sunk. Both ways are getting some good out of it.

  • @anandpant4940
    @anandpant4940 Рік тому +3

    No one asking to us that, why the ruining maritime nature, creature,and ruining the balance of salt water...

  • @dohyunbarg
    @dohyunbarg Рік тому +2

    좋은 철분 공급원이 되는군

  • @toddsimone7182
    @toddsimone7182 Рік тому +2

    They sink them with the gun turrets still on board? Seems wasteful but I'm sure there's a reason.

  • @user-pp1ni2jy3f
    @user-pp1ni2jy3f 2 місяці тому

    Saddens me they couldn't save the Kitty Hawk. Would of made a great floating museum.

  • @carlseiz1266
    @carlseiz1266 Рік тому +7

    I don't understand why they sync these ships why can't they just reuse the metal for new ships

    • @j.3m.857
      @j.3m.857 Рік тому +1

      That’s easy!. They own the money and the power to do so

  • @jamesbeemer7855
    @jamesbeemer7855 Рік тому +1

    Why can’t they recycle them ?
    Huh ? Look at all that scap they could build something else out of .

  • @CC-iq2pe
    @CC-iq2pe Рік тому +14

    the cost of wasting the steel is reason enough that they should recycle the ships rather than use them as target practice.

    • @drekelley2352
      @drekelley2352 Рік тому +2

      They wasted more than steel. People are homeless. They could have turned that into a shelter

    • @RealMTBAddict
      @RealMTBAddict Рік тому +4

      @@drekelley2352 Giving people housing won't make them responsible citizens.

    • @jimgiordano3613
      @jimgiordano3613 Рік тому

      Where are the green people when you need them?

    • @robertwillis4061
      @robertwillis4061 Рік тому +1

      ​@@jimgiordano3613 At trans rights demonstrations being green isn't that cool anymore

    • @jamesplymire5342
      @jamesplymire5342 Рік тому

      ​@@jimgiordano3613 Fisherman pollute the waters more than any of these ships.

  • @prokastinatore
    @prokastinatore Місяць тому

    For combat training it might make sense to destroy old navy ships wich are out of order. But I wanna make sure that this is a heavy kind of pollution and that's not okay!

  • @brownsboy23
    @brownsboy23 Рік тому +1

    How they guard that 90th parallel doe

  • @29obbie29
    @29obbie29 Рік тому

    Chill with the music bro

  • @lisalynnn
    @lisalynnn 8 місяців тому

    Why am I sitting here feeling sorry for a ship being fired upon while defenseless? 😅

  • @sanjayrao8090
    @sanjayrao8090 Рік тому

    What about the brave sailors&crew🌝

  • @Rexluna1
    @Rexluna1 Рік тому +4

    Why does he talk so slow

  • @MinhNguyen-nl1gm
    @MinhNguyen-nl1gm Рік тому

    Người Mỹ họ phung phí quá trời luôn. Sao không mang đi bán ve chai hi hi 🤗👍

  • @bhhyilmaz
    @bhhyilmaz Місяць тому

    YEAH SHOW THE PIRATE SHIP BUT NOT THE SINKING MOMENT YEAH YEAH 15.00 MINUTE VIDEO YEAH GREAT!

  • @benjaminthistle6637
    @benjaminthistle6637 Рік тому

    I'd like to see the metal recycled an create other target that mimick vessel the most inexpensive way,

  • @alexnet8943
    @alexnet8943 Рік тому +4

    Кто может испугать такую страну с таким народом !?🙂☝

  • @lunamaria1048
    @lunamaria1048 Рік тому +2

    Such a waste of resources😟

  • @keithroy9217
    @keithroy9217 Рік тому +2

    Don’t these guys recycle?

  • @kirkkirkland7244
    @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

    We still could be using the battleships that we have and they are almost a hundred years old!!!

  • @uchungnguyen7686
    @uchungnguyen7686 Рік тому

    Quá Sợ Luôn

  • @historybricksbyd
    @historybricksbyd Рік тому +2

    Cool!

  • @lawrenceiverson1924
    @lawrenceiverson1924 Рік тому +3

    Why doesn't the Navy sell its 2nd hand ships to poor countries They could get paid for them , then goto war with the new owner and sink it anyway LOL!!!!! Crane Ops get paid REAL good money !!!

    • @gilbertnadeau7181
      @gilbertnadeau7181 Рік тому

      We do sell or lease ships that are still seaworthy or capable of serving. Many like the LST in the video are just to worn out for anyone to want.

    • @RealMTBAddict
      @RealMTBAddict Рік тому

      The video stated that all these ships are too far gone to repair. Pay attention

  • @Edgar77581
    @Edgar77581 Рік тому

    Sirvio tantos años a su país solo para terminar así, eso está muy mal. Es un crimen grave contaminar el océano, por qué no los reciclan?.

  • @JustReed
    @JustReed 29 днів тому

    The irony here is, our government provides more homes for the fishes than they do to it's peoples.

  • @georem57
    @georem57 Рік тому

    sick minds

  • @normanconnor
    @normanconnor Рік тому +2

    Selling for scrap would make more sense. Am sure America has many that can be trusted to scrap them

  • @ioannis69k
    @ioannis69k Рік тому +5

    Tha’s for the good of the planet 🤡🤪

  • @JavierHernandez-xs9pr
    @JavierHernandez-xs9pr Рік тому +4

    Stop pollution....

    • @hotrd91614
      @hotrd91614 Рік тому

      Do you take a bus daily?,,if not you're probably driving around with emissions coming from your car

    • @JavierHernandez-xs9pr
      @JavierHernandez-xs9pr Рік тому

      Go and ask your father who is your real papa

  • @DJcyberslash
    @DJcyberslash Рік тому +2

    They care more about the ship than everyday Americans.

    • @albedopiazzolla5129
      @albedopiazzolla5129 Рік тому

      To be fair, that ship has done, and is capable of far more than everyday Americans.

  • @starcrib
    @starcrib 10 місяців тому

    The Water Planet: EARTH. ♾️🌎🌍🌏♾️

  • @roostercogburn809
    @roostercogburn809 Рік тому +5

    Why not recycle???

  • @gewglesux
    @gewglesux Рік тому

    dunno what they pay those divers.... but aint enough

  • @shaneshepherd7753
    @shaneshepherd7753 Рік тому

    Australia has a Air force??? Wtf??? Lol

  • @-BigIi-
    @-BigIi- Рік тому +7

    Let's fill the ocean with our junk..? I know it's big, but....

    • @UnicornMeat512
      @UnicornMeat512 Рік тому +1

      It's actually proven to help revitalize coral reefs

  • @MultiMattman68
    @MultiMattman68 Рік тому +1

    What a waste of resources. Just sink the damn vessels,open the seacocks and let the ship sink along with help from a submarine

  • @harrykekgmail
    @harrykekgmail Рік тому

    Awesome

  • @andywilkerson4617
    @andywilkerson4617 Рік тому

    I did not see the Zumwalt as a target practice.....a disappointment..

  • @thomasecosse
    @thomasecosse 2 місяці тому

    These background sounds are a turnoff, gave up after 0:47

  • @GothicCinderz
    @GothicCinderz Рік тому

    Why wouldn't they dump them there? They have trash in space, trash in the ground, why not dump it somewhere where you can't see. It's the same thing as sweeping it under the carpet.

  • @kirkkirkland7244
    @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

    Why would they sink these ships so deep??? They should sink them in sallow water so divers can enjoy them!!!

  • @KevinS3928
    @KevinS3928 Рік тому +3

    Well shite, I hated to see this! I was on the Racine, I never knew she was used in a sink-ex, she was a great ship! This blows! 😢

  • @prokastinatore
    @prokastinatore Місяць тому

    Why can't the US sell navy ships who are out of duty to nations who wanna take control on pirates like Somalia?

  • @benjaminevans2422
    @benjaminevans2422 Рік тому

    I''m not an Expert, but it just seems like a Waste of Time and Money to Build a War Vessel that won't last long enough to make it to the 80-100 Military Service Year, before being Scrapped.

  • @DebongZan
    @DebongZan Рік тому

    Uss Connecticut hit a big rock in South China Sea ..ha ha, 😄😄

  • @jamesplymire5342
    @jamesplymire5342 Рік тому +1

    Sorry, but it's not scary. It's good for training.

  • @andarilhoblackpillimortal4579
    @andarilhoblackpillimortal4579 Рік тому +1

    Andarilho 🐺😎🍿👣👣👣

  • @linsayhenry920
    @linsayhenry920 Рік тому

    The military will only show the breaking up of the hull not the actual removing the electronics. Do some research and your reporting will be believable..

  • @BlackJeepsMatter
    @BlackJeepsMatter Рік тому +2

    This is sooooooooooo fluctup!

  • @kevinwirth4767
    @kevinwirth4767 Рік тому

    I could never understand why ships would be sunk instead of scrapped and reused...seems like such a waste

  • @marcbrewster1169
    @marcbrewster1169 Рік тому

    Instead of sinking these ships, why not recycle the metals and save our resources for other things. So much waste of steel and iron and other metals.

  • @jamesfrancismchalejr7944
    @jamesfrancismchalejr7944 Рік тому

    " money down the drain "

  • @thomsghost769
    @thomsghost769 Рік тому +3

    how much money can we waste?

  • @denniswenrich261
    @denniswenrich261 Рік тому

    Wow they piss away your tax money this is how they keep begging for more the employees and their military industrial complex

  • @drekelley2352
    @drekelley2352 Рік тому +11

    They can care less about the fishes. They are putting a lot of pollution in the ocean with those ships sinking. I bet it's a lot of oil gas, antifreeze, and whatever other fluids that can be stuck with the ship.

    • @MrAkaacer
      @MrAkaacer Рік тому +7

      Do you know for certain or is it some BS guess? My understanding is they strip the ship which includes draining it of all fluids and then towed into position for target practice.

    • @raygunreagan2274
      @raygunreagan2274 Рік тому +10

      @@MrAkaacer it’s a bs guess. they drain the ships of all fluids then when the ship is sunk in a predetermined location so it can act as an artificial reef which is good for the marine wildlife.

    • @m.a.7308
      @m.a.7308 Рік тому +1

      This is exactly what came to my mind. Why all this pollution and sea life destruction

    • @daaz1911
      @daaz1911 Рік тому

      All of the ships are cleaned of petroleum products, toxins prior to sinking. Additionally, the military has a third party group inspect each prior to skinking

    • @drekelley2352
      @drekelley2352 Рік тому +2

      @Francis Hoang you can't get rid of absolutely all of the fluids and left over chemicals on a ship like that it next to impossible.

  • @Michael98721
    @Michael98721 Рік тому

    Basically they spew tons of toxic lead ammo and attack and sink ships covered in tons of tox paint! Also they don't seem to do a very good job of sinking ship either! The way they did the barge was cool!

  • @paganini1126
    @paganini1126 Рік тому +1

    Hay que ser bien WOM para no Reutilizar el Acero

  • @themixchannel1816
    @themixchannel1816 Рік тому +2

    Not good for the sea life😢

  • @saikousikikan
    @saikousikikan Рік тому

    Bermuda triangle

  • @ccameron777
    @ccameron777 Рік тому +1

    jumbled up mess.... what a waste of 15 minutes

  • @MZ-bl6wg
    @MZ-bl6wg Рік тому

    I’m still shocked that we invite China to participate in RIMPAC ? I want peace with China but it’s clear it’s not going to happen anytime soon with their threats to us about Taiwan but we still invite them to the exercise?

    • @tychos872
      @tychos872 Рік тому +1

      Its a political thing. 1st its an olive branch to keep relations and dialog going. 2nd its a big intimidating warning to not play stupid games for stupid prizes. Thats my view anyway. Oh and while they see our skill, doctrine and fire power, we get a peek at theirs. Nobody wants to come and look incompetent in front of all the the different navys afterall.

  • @rs2143
    @rs2143 Рік тому

    😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😮😮😮

  • @Jasona1976
    @Jasona1976 Рік тому +4

    What a waste of money all the way around. Criminal and wasteful.

  • @albertmarsh1796
    @albertmarsh1796 Рік тому +2

    What a waste to sink them why not cut them up in this country and melt them down put people in this country to work and build new ship's just like they do cars