632/1050 HP SR20 Aluminum Block Pump Gas Engine. Robert Williams.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @josephpaige3614
    @josephpaige3614 4 роки тому +11

    632....... All ALUMINUM......PUMP GAS......FANTASTIC NUMBERS.

  • @Wildkat-1
    @Wildkat-1 4 роки тому +8

    Damn good for pump gas !

  • @Robert-mn8gc
    @Robert-mn8gc 2 роки тому +1

    What Fuel ⛽️ 2 do that HP 1050 . XCELLENT.
    The 632 from Chevy Performance is at 1004 @ 12.1 on 93 ⛽️ with 876 TQ .
    With Coil Packs & Crank Trigger Ignition.
    Love ❤️ Ur Engines, especially the 409/509 That u guys build . My fabulous uncle in Australia 🇦🇺 had a Genuine 409 Chevy Impala Convertible in baby yellow. He had approx 6-8 other Impala's & like me loves everything with Grunt out of the USA 🇺🇸. I'm especially in2 hot boats like the 19 & 21 ft Daytona jet boats from Eliminator in SOUTHERN California & Gullwing jet boat originally by a Chap called Youngblood & the mighty Beismeyer Flat Bottom & GN Rayson Craft both V-drives .
    Looking 4ward 2 more content from u folk.
    Cheers Scott .
    Robert Australia 🇦🇺

  • @rongravel4585
    @rongravel4585 5 років тому +6

    Wow. Nice piece. 1066hp is no joke for only 632ci

    • @cjcamp4871
      @cjcamp4871 5 років тому +4

      Ron Gravel ONLY your saying a 632 is small lol.

    • @VicinalElk44104
      @VicinalElk44104 5 років тому

      Well there is a 1005 ci engine floating around on UA-cam that makes like 2300hp naturally aspirated, so this 632 with 1050hp seems a little lower than what it could potentially make

    • @Ivan-lw2ux
      @Ivan-lw2ux 5 років тому +4

      Pretty standard for a pump gas 632 with sr20 heads....and ive heard this shops hp ratings are a tad exaggerated.

    • @imaginova88
      @imaginova88 4 роки тому

      Approx 100hp per litre, NA👌. Power aside, that torque👍

    • @maniacracingDTR
      @maniacracingDTR 4 роки тому

      Ivan how much exaggerated?

  • @stevesolo16
    @stevesolo16 7 місяців тому

    The compression would be good to know. Also, some of the internals. Other than that, inspiring.

  • @bonestock
    @bonestock 3 роки тому

    wish list

  • @davidleary823
    @davidleary823 Рік тому

    That’s pretty easy to do with that combo.

  • @TheKwod
    @TheKwod 4 роки тому

    How much weight?...454 vs 632..?

    • @AndyB718
      @AndyB718 3 роки тому +4

      632 is much lighter being its an aluminum block.

  • @chrisbryant1657
    @chrisbryant1657 3 роки тому

    🙄🙄

  • @andrewhunter6371
    @andrewhunter6371 3 роки тому +3

    I say "bullshit" to those numbers,, In reality its about 860-900 with those heads using 10.75-1 comp,, IF you went to 15-1 on the same heads you would hit that 1050-1100 number.....

    • @craighills2382
      @craighills2382 3 роки тому

      I have asked for an engine off other builders and used these numbers as a comparison,they say the Shafferoff dyno is to happy for the numbers ????

    • @andrewhunter6371
      @andrewhunter6371 3 роки тому

      @@craighills2382 NO way with low comp and pump gas,, isn't going to happen....

    • @daltonmajor8832
      @daltonmajor8832 3 роки тому +8

      @@andrewhunter6371 those SR20 heads flow really well, especially if they have been ported. i know of a 632 with dart pro 2 heads at about 10:1 compression with a mild cam that made 940hp, and i have no doubt with these SR20 heads that flow a good 60+cfm more and with a bigger cam that it would see 1000+hp

    • @AndyB718
      @AndyB718 3 роки тому +3

      I say you wouldn't know how to fill a tank on 1000 hp motor.
      Sr20 heads at 632 should make a 1000 on accident.

    • @AndyB718
      @AndyB718 3 роки тому +1

      @@craighills2382 not at all...motors run exaclty what they advertise as per track and Wallace calculators.