Not at all. Kuyper simply clarifies Christian teaching. People who don’t like Kuyper are scared of “theonomy” but there is no reason to be critical. He only carries out the idea that there is neutrality. Unfortunately, people like yourself think there is such a thing as neutrality and probably you are Arminian in your stance about some things as well.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
We all miss Chuck! Thanks for sharing this....
Love Kuyper! Common grace books are my intro to him
Shared on Facebook
Kuyper was disaster on common grace and his teachings have led to errors like theonomy, the federal vision and dominion theology.
Not at all. Kuyper simply clarifies Christian teaching. People who don’t like Kuyper are scared of “theonomy” but there is no reason to be critical. He only carries out the idea that there is neutrality. Unfortunately, people like yourself think there is such a thing as neutrality and probably you are Arminian in your stance about some things as well.
There are some overlaps between theonomy and Kuyperianism, but they are not one and the same, and Kuyper was definitely not FV.