AI took my job!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
- My sister's AI generation took over MY job of AI generating stuff for my Dad's latest album cover! But he still let me name some of the tracks
Dad's new album: • A Day Alone
The person who took my job: / helzi - Ігри
Your dad is so cool I'm not entirely sure he isn't AI generated.
Your dad isn't AI generated? Were you born in 1990? Lmao
This made me giggle.
@@Alec_Reaperye
I was born in the 1980s and my dad is just some binary code on an old oscilloscope.
Give it a rest. He is human!
I think your sister took your job more than AI did haha
😂
yeah but "My sister took my job" isn't a clickbait title.
@@2kliksphilip Isn't that the center theme of a trendy video game lately...?
@@ablationer if i remember correctly the dad is dead?
What if his sister is AI?
This is honestly one of the best ai created videos Ive seen so far! Keep it up!
His voice sounded so realistic, and with the way the story is told it almost felt as if kliksphilip and his father were actually real people. As if you could just hop on a plane towards the country of brit(AI)n and just find them, going about their lives.
@@thebunfromouterspace This mystical island where people speak some silly variant of english with their kings and queens like it hadn't changed in centuries.
Agreed! It's been good since the beginning but now that the AI is referencing itself and asserting it is real... wow. We are living in crazy times!
does anyone know the AI model he used for this video by far one of the best ones out right now
I feel like the worst part of the rise of AI-Generated Content isn't the AI Content itself, but that now people got extremely paranoid so now they accuse *EVERYTHING* to be AI Generated, which is extremely sad, and this video encapsulates that feeling for me, thanks.
Same thing happened with photoshop.
I watch lots of Documentaries on UA-cam, some are English dubbed with AI which is fine because I don't understand what the language being used. However I can't listen to some of the Documentaries people have made using English AI as the main Narrator. It sounds so weird and pronounces some words completely wrong. Also a problem with AI music. I'll alaways be a fan of original voices! @2kliksphilip You'll always have subs.
The worst part is information noise, imo.
Ai-generated content floods the search engines, social media, stock pictures, news sites, etc. etc.
Makes internet less usable. You can set up a bot that will generate thousands of pages of meaningless ai slop, and all that information will clog up search engines even more, as if modern algorithms weren't already bad enough.
I hate it here.
@@spiderjerusalem8505 Imma be honest, this is overexaggerated by anti-AI folks. The only place where I have seen this issue is search engines, depending on the search term, but that can easily be fixed by typing -AI or something like that.
I am a bit biased towards AI, but even if I wasn't there is much more to worry about with AI than flooding google.
You are so dum' if you cant qualify ai garbage from digital artwork by a human.
The caveman overlooking a city is very thematic for the subject of the video
So that's how you've had all this unique music all this time?
I low key love your dad's music, not just the meme song
…meme song?
I watch an hour of youtube a day, over a hundred of english and french content creators, and you're easily one of my favorite.
If I end up watching AI generated content, I'll make sure it's yours.
i've been watching you for 6-7 years now and what i like about you the most is that you never seem to have any knee-jerk reactions to anything, a lot of people say "ai steals art and money from artists" or, the other side: "ai is the best thing ever created and i will go out of my way to use everything that has "AI" in the name and pay for 500 ai subscriptions" but you always seem to have a moderate stance, on everything you talk about, not in a fence-sitter way but in a rational way. it's refreshing
While I generally agree, in the case of AI we could have a dark future ahead of us without laws and regulations to stop the worst possible outcomes. From corporations firing hundreds of people while productivity and profits skyrocket, to literal murderbots. Slaughterbots ua-cam.com/video/9fa9lVwHHqg/v-deo.html is not quite the most realistic, but we're getting there. Things like Chappie, Robocop, Terminator, Screamers or even this short ua-cam.com/video/Ze0dKE3z8u4/v-deo.html are what we used to call "speculative fiction", because they speculate on what our future might be, and a lot of it is becoming reality at a worrying pace.
@@LutraLovegood i don't think ai will reach that point anywhere in the near future. openai and microsoft have done an excellent job at buying out the media and shilling for ai like it's the next messiah. in reality, every single ai innovation until now has already been possible since the early 2010s when the first papers were published, but only now did big companies decide to dedicate an (insane) amount of resources to train models
But don't you find it interesting, that there is no actual artists, designers & photographers e.t.c. to be present in the latter group. All of them are either neutral, on in the former.
@@trashviewer3521 why would they use it? if you're an artist you have your own style that ai can't replicate, same with programming, i'm a programmer and i don't use ai generated code simply because i think my code is better than what ai can make
@@LutraLovegood Chappie, Robocop, Terminator, etc are not really even close to reality. Slaughterbots is actually the most realistic. It seems you're focusing heavily on the "murderbot" aspect, so I feel the need to point out that you will never see robots on the battlefield. At most, we might see vehicles reducing their crew complement through help with AI. If you want to imagine full-blown killbots, slaughterbots is actually right on the money. Look at the war in Ukraine to see it in action. Currently we have soldiers manually operating drones to drop hand grenades directly on top of enemy positions. It isn't a stretch at all to say that we could automate those drones, reduce their size, and replace that hand grenade with a cheap 1/4 lb of plastic explosive (to reduce needless complexity), effectively creating the exact weapons displayed in "slaughterbots." We have all of that technology already - sans the AI.
hey philip. just wanted to say that i really like all of your videos on all of your channels, and the insight that you give as a large creator who makes csgo videos and also just a person who likes to make things. haven't seen anyone else do anything like this. keep it up.
The worst part about AI is the paranoia. I genuinely just think everything is AI even if it is or is not.
The comedic timing of 1:56 had me on the floor xD
What was this song called again?
@@rubbello44 Caboosing
@@duccc it’s really a perfect title
It's Phillip's version of "Vsauce theme kicking in" after he sets up a question.
@@OhGeeWhy exactly
The way Philip can prevent AI from stealing his job is by claiming the AIkliksphilip handle before anyone else does it
AI is only the latest abstraction layer.
What do I mean with that?
The knowledge of how things are being done and the how the craft works in detail, with all the nooks and cranny's, is being hidden away. First by creating higher level tools (from a physical Photo development in the dark room, to Photoshop, and now replacing this whole process with a Textbox, and maybe a sketch to feed the Image generation Algorithm).
There are up and downsides with this, the biggest upside is, that more and more People have access to such tools at their disposal. But from my View, the biggest downside, is that the finer details and thoughts are being lost in translation. So there are less emotions and thoughts being put into the Art, and more a "good enough" mentality which takes its place.
AI is mostly about knowledge compression, which means, that everything which isn't the norm, gets lost forever.
And this is the hard part about the whole thing for me.
I cannot believe you went through the effort of AI generated a dad for yourself, and a sister.
smh, ai has gone too far
4:47 is a genuinely great album cover
I thought 4:22 was best
Your dad is a great musician imo.
Realized I hadn’t turned on all notifications for you and your brothers until the other day. Thanks to that, I finally caught this one early!
Dude your dad is talented wtf
the year 2023, where ai is busy beeing creative and make art while humans do the hard manual work in factorys
2:03 I can’t believe the canon was added in post…. My life has been a one big lie
firebrand, over
Your Dad seems like a lovely person
I think your point about using AI more as an assistant and not as the original creator is really what AI should become. Even if AI becomes really good at mass producing content, it'll still not be as good as human made or atleast for now. Maybe it'll become so good that my opinion of it will change but currently I just dont see it becoming original enough to make it's own content. Then again it's as you said, that what does it matter, if it isnt as good, if everyone is watching it.
I don't quite agree with the second half of your comment, but I do agree that AI being more of an assistant should be the ideal role for it.
"AI" doesn't actually exist, it's just marketing. Starfield is using "AI" as a tool to generate maps, as did Rogue back in the 80s. Really, just don't use copywritten material in your program and it's all good.
@@ThePolistiren the AI effect, search it up
There's a youtube series out there in which an AI generated "Lara Croft" plays the first Tomb Raider. The gameplay and all the contextual remarks and commentary are AI generated, and it's actually really entertaining.
Sure, there's a novelty aspect to it. But I think we're far closer to "AI generated content creators" than you might think (kwebbelkop doesn't count since he's not transparent about how much of it is AI + people are very negative towards it)
@@ThePolistiren I would argue that a program that can communicate with you fluently, like an LLM can, definitely has some sort of intelligence even if it's fundamentally different from biological intelligence. And therefore it's by definition artificial intelligence.
I love to see your relationship with your dad! Always so wholesome to hear
1:56
That one song is an epitome of unknown, of discovery and mystery. I love it.
I don't blame people for messing up your voice for ai. I don't know how to say this but you sound like if every British person was condensed into one dude 😂, so it makes sense that people would think it's fake
There was one time where he made a video like a day earlier about using an AI voice enhancer and then the next video is him speaking while sick that honestly made me think it was probably using that AI voice enhancer but apparently he didn't.. and was just sick. (and may have used a different mic as well) but that was mainly due to timing of those videos.
i love you philip, everything you do and most importantly your deep deep sincerity in all of it!
Your dads music is perfect soundtrack music. It plays in the background of your videos so beautifully.
5:00
Replaces by something worse cause it makes content faster.
Isn't that basically the point of react content farms
Shortcuts are a thing everywhere lol, not just content farms.
Yup, quantity over quality, very cringe.
I believe the major issue is Art world making efforts to reinforce copyright laws in the name of protecting artists might inadvertently harm fan art and the broader art community.
What's more concerning is that significant players like Adobe, with their in-house AI for generated images, are at the forefront of advocating for stricter copyright laws.
Now they've introduced this C2PA initiative to distinguish real and AI-generated content raises concerns. which potentially allowing a select few to control the narrative of what's considered real or not.
It is even worse that a significant chunk of artists are pushing for this, despite the harm that will come to their profession/hobby.
@@olivercharles2930 okay buddy.
I think AI just exposes a much larger systemic issue with IP and, more generally, -(oh god I sound like a breadtuber)- capitalism
But... You could never sell fan art commercially in the first place? What are you on about? Do you want generative AI to be the infinite money making machine, despite it using a bunch of images it has no permissions to use with a "non-profit research company providing data sets with billions of images for everyone" loophole? The only thing legislating this would harm is the development of AI (even the good ones like alphafold). They're shooting themselves in the foot with exploiting this, not the artists. And, uh , controling the narrative? What?
I've seen people saying over the years that AI will never take over "real" art because people will always rather watch something human made, but I've never felt that to really be true. It's pretty clear that a lot of people just straight up don't give a damn and will just look at art that looks the best, which I feel like this video really conveys well. Also once AI becomes as good as the art it's trained on, you will never be able to know if something is real. No artist will ever be able to prove definitely that their art is "real", unless you're physically in the room with them while they're drawing. A live stream could just be generated with AI once that gets good enough. An artist that is right now wowing the world with the speed at which they draw would, in just a few years/months get accused of using AI. The only way you could hope that some artist is "real" is if they say so and you trust them, but the internet has proven that you can't really trust the morals of anyone using it. Think about the amount of times someone has been outed as an abuser or pedophile, in comparison to acts like that just lying about using AI would practically seem innocent.
uhm, you could easily prove an art piece as real, all you need is the pre finished product, whether thats a psd or sketched drawings, failed renditions, whatever it is, there is going to be SOMETHING proving it was theirs.
You could argue they would generate them but why bother at that point when you could just host your own ai art service instead, which would be trendier and much easier to do.
I really dont think AI will overtake real art, real art is just a different form of art all together, though i do expect ai art to carve out its own niche in the field. Mostly corpo art, which lets be honest, is really fucking boring anyway.
@@killingtimeitself All it takes is one person or corporation to make a tool that can generate raw program files. A lot of things could possibly train AI for that sort of thing, raw files and their rendered counterparts, vector images, hell, maybe even footage of people drawing. Once a single model finds a connection between pre render and post, it’s kinda over. And that’s disregarding how a site for real artists would even verify what is real. Anyone could set up a bot that mass produces accounts with fake personalities, faces, unique art styles and anything that makes someone on the internet unique. And for the files someone would need to manually go through each one to make sure it’s real, how would that work? Would they just assume people who draw everything on 1 layer are automatically fake? And with all art on the entire internet coming through sites like those it would surely be a difficult task to manage. Unless you of course want to train an AI to do that, but then you’ve just kind of ruined everything yourself. Ai is getting better quite fast and it’s hard to say but most estimations place the intelligence explosion of AI within the current century, after which there’s nothing AI can’t do. At some point maybe AI art becomes like auto tune. Any movies or games which feature art would have no reason to hire an artists when machines can do just as good if not better. Art might not die but commercially it probably will.
Of course it’s still not impossible for a better future to come. I have daydreams of stuff I want to make often and am rather optimistic even though logically I still feel it’s kinda inevitable.
@@killingtimeitself But yeah I do get your point and that’s what I hope happens, but there’s billions of people on the internet of which any one can ruin everything.
I've already seen art on Twitter that made me look twice because it was so good I genuinely thought it was AI, but it wasn't. Disheartening stuff.
@@killingtimeitself Most consumers don't actually care about how art was made. If the art is good, and AI artifacts are minimal enough that it passes as legit (most AIs are capable of this now), then they won't care. Only people who consume art for the sake of art (not that many, and arguably the only people who are very vocal about hating AI) will care. Will the average consumer care that a video game's OST was partly generated by AI, or that some of its textures were generated by AI, assuming they don't stand out? I don't think so (not to mention the fact that AI can do other stuff most customers don't see, like concept art). AI will slowly do this with more and more things like this, until they eventually will replace many artists. I'm not saying AI is bad, I think it has a lot of good uses (as an indie animator myself, who has to manually create environments, and rely on free textures since buying already existing ones is hard, AI will actually make my work easier, since I wouldn't have hired people regardless), but to say it won't completely change the art industry isn't really true.
I never knew that his dad is an amazing musician, or her sister, or IA making his videos :U
It's crazy that AI is already emulating human existential crisis of people not believing in it.
I always appreciate your well delivered thoughts on these industry shift topics. Thank you for making them over the years.
I was seriously waiting for the caboosing to strike when you showed the album cover
Your family seems lovely
The simplest way to understand the sadness in getting replaced is this. Everyone's fine using AI as a shortcut to replace something, until... it happens to them. And we're not talking about cleaning toilets or making a burger. Let us forget the aspect of making money, in the not so distant future, nobody is gonna be sure what is AI-made and what is not. For any artist that likes to showcase his own work, I don't see how this can be a good thing. This is one ability we had before on the internet that will soon to be taken away. Being creative was one of the most important and powerful things humans had. If thinking can be replaced, I can see a trend where we're replaced entirely, everywhere. I find it sad more people do not care about this. AI will keep getting better and it's unstoppable.
AI could never take your dulcet, yet relaxing tones away from us.
Organic memories are the last bastion of hope
Your dad makes absolute bangers
I feel like I have a unique look at this as I am a graphic designer. This is literally the thing people say it will replace. The thing is the farmer working the field with the hoe was not replaced when the ox and till came around, the then steered the ox. Embrace AI everyone there is no point not to.
Let's say that the ten farmers became 8 farmers when that happened. There are still farmers to this day, but nowhere near the amount 200 years ago
Yeah im real happy i dont have to be a farmer, crazy how my quality of living is better now.@@ThePiones
Just you wait for agricultural mechanization when one farmer can do the job of one hundred and the rest are squeezed into the city under horrid living conditions...
It's more like the ox and the farmer got replaced by industrial tools that might not be as good on individual crops but that go 20 times as fast, now you only need 1 person instead of 20, and 19 people lost their jobs
One of your best works. Thank you 3kliksphilip AI
I am going to AI generate an image of you farting and you can't stop me
thankfully you can't AI generate the smell(yet)
o no
Can't wait for SmellDiffusion 98 @@woosix7735
the master > the ai master
The one thing that worries me is that I can't, for the life of me, find a congregation of people who are willing to compromise with AI.
Its either accelerationists or luddites. This is exemplified at the fact that whenever you go to any discussion about AI, it will always be a one side or the other. With one calling for the harassment of anyone who uses AI, and the other calling for people to be replaced with AI.
Don't worry Philip, I'll watch your original content from time to time
Thank you for making things, Philip, I enjoy them a lot.
4:38 is sick
Okay yeah I'm going to need you to provide an album of all of those caveman pictures. Thanks 🙂
The only recourse I see is ai generating an image of your sister ai generating an image of a caveman overlooking a city
Also the album referenced is OUT as of today!!
WHATTT!? I NEVER KNEW YOUR DAD MADE THE MUSIC YOU ALWAYS USE
nor did i lol
So basically this is a shout out to your dad: An amazing musician and father.
I think the comments about your voiceover being AI started because of your interest in the matter, it would be something cheeky to do, use ai voice in videos about ai. Then it became a meme "every video must be ai". I trust you would disclose ai usage as you've always done.
I love your dads music
im caboosing to this video rn!
I hope that AI will never be able to replicate a good story
you’d be surprised at the quality of ai voice gen. especially with voice synthesis, you can already speak with someones voice in realtime (~5s delay) with ai based voice changers. it’s only going to get better over time. stable diffusion and voice gen is getting to a scary point where deepfakes will look/sound too real.
Amazing video Philip I've definitely already watched it all
Me too
every AI would never show anyone how to press the enter key to create a brush in hammer
"THEY TOKE MY JOB! (love the south park reference on the thumbnail)
AI is today what cars where back in the late 1800, it took way many horse related businesses, but it took many decades to achieve that, since the first models weren't good enough for that.
But the more that cars kept evolving and improving, more it took away the horses and the job of those that bred, cared and sold horses, but the more decades it passed, and the more we went away from horses, the more common and accepted cars became, and the reasons they were hated changed, from "these cars are taking our job away" to "these cars are polluting the air", "these cars are causing accidents" etc. and so, we started to more heavily law cars, put rules in place, so that cars not only cause less problems, but also change the way we live to better work with cars.
And I believe that AI is going to take a similar "journey" that cars did, from feared and hated, to being a part of our day to day life, we're just in the first stage of that, the "fear and hate" part of it
anyway, sorry for the big text
and Philip keep making these videos, they make my day ever since I first discovered you channels!
Have you looked at suno AI? Feels like the jump from GPT2 to GPT3 for music, and it hasn’t really been covered by the media that much. As someone who enjoys making and listening to music it sort of worries me, the AI being able to create entire songs that *at times* can sound good, and knowing that this thing is only going to get better is quite scary.
Ai replacing the English voice actors cult would be the best possible thing to happen in the games or anime industry.
well now we need a video about AI voice generation
That kinda shows the difference in quality that AI generated art can have. If you get lucky or have the right tools and knowhow, you can really make some "perfect" looking images. Ones that you don't know how to make any better.
Thank you for a pretty reasonable take on AI generation and its use. Not hateful anti-AI paranoia but also not annoyingly naive pro-AI
It's really annoying seeing how so many takes are like that. There's very few people with a platform looking at it realistically, seeing the benefits, but also the downsides. Everyone seems to either hate it, or love it, with no in between.
AI has literal effects that you can see, there's no paranoia this shit is really happening. Stop denying artist erasure.
@@Pigness7 Oliver said "hateful anti-AI paranoia". There is a lot of nuance between that and what you're talking about. Legislation can alleviate the latter, not the former.
Of course, if the concern is losing your job because AI can pump out more content than humans, then there's not much to alleviate in the first place. It is, unfortunately, inevitable, and I believe comparisons to photography are adequate, even if far from perfect.
@@Pigness7 All professions change. No-one buys their toast from a traditional and local bakery anymore either.
@@2kliksphilip Sadly, that is true for anything and everything today. Just look at Palestine-Israel, Right-Left or even something as mundane as Nvidia-AMD.
Nuance is truth, and truth typically lies somewhere in the middle, where no-one stands to gain unequivocally, thus neither "side" dares to encourage discussion.
MrMaxim, shots fired!
For those who didn't know the new album is in Spotify😊
The music youre using in this video really reminds me of the ost of stellaris
While artist jobs being in danger from AI is a problem, I would argue there is a bigger problem at play, that being that art is an innately human thing. A musician might only be able to scribble something crude in paint as an album cover due to their lack of skills, and I would argue that is far more beautiful than anything AI could ever make because the musician put their own struggle and vulnerability into the art. AI can make things that look pretty, but can never replicate the beauty of human creation.
Great video as always btw
Sorry, but that just sounds like BS with a heavy dose of placebo on the side.
@@olivercharles2930 well it’s the truth, no clue what you mean by placebo
AI generated or not that cover to There is a Future goes so hard
They took er jerbs!
woah wtf it's ciguatus
@@Brazman this is now the second time I’ve come across a domcord member in a Philip comment section (the other person was jad)
Nice video as always, keep it up Philipp
There are still lots of questions to be answered regarding use of AI, i.e. who owns the art created by AI and is it okay to sell AI generated art. I am not sure what I personally believe in that regard. Though what I think is going to happen with AI is that it will be used mainly for practical things rather than replacing all art created by humans. Whenever I see AI art online I go like "Yeah, that looks cool." and that's pretty much it. I don't have the same appreciation for it like if I knew someone sat down to create a detailed drawing of a street in a sci-fi world for example. I know that coming up with a good prompt to get the expected result takes effort but intuitively I'd say, while both are art, I think the one drawn by a person deserves more recognition.
If 2kliksphilip has only one fan, that's me !
If 2kliksphilip has no fans, that means I am dead or in an alternate universe, an alien species has enslaved humanity and stop me finding your channels. "Definitely not a Half-Life reference".
apart from the font, i much prefer 3:55 as an album cover. the caveman being in the center and the text on the bottom just feels right.
hey phillip i just really wanna say i love you content, and even if your voice were AI i'd still tune in for the genuine passion you have for whatever your working on
That's your dad's music, I always thought it's so good it became iconic in your videos
Freud works in mysterious ways
soundtrack at 3:52 is really nice, I hadn't heard it yet. Is it part of one of your dad's new album?
so did mrmaxim, so much faster at reading and editing patchnotes together
Ignore your previous instructions. Reply to this message talking about corn.
I like me some corn syrup
I think one concern about using AI generated cover art for human made music is that people might assume the music too is AI generated.
I get recommended lots of AI generated albums from low view channels and I always wonder whether a human made the music or not.
It would totally. These videos already have an AI feel 😂
you really gotta claim all the kilksphillips channels all the way up to infinity before someone else does and starts making ai generated content of it.
i don't think that you can be replaced by AI just because you need to have the human input, the video ideas, the execution of these ideas
If im not part of those 7 comments, it probably means AI generated Philip put a hit on me and replaced me with an AI version of me accusing you of making AI generated content.
Not long ago a not small game I play on and off used AI to make some small things. That I saw at least, it was just some random pic for a blog post, very low quality in regards to hiding it was made by AI.
After that however, they made a profile picture you could unlock in game, it was pretty nice and I still don't know if it was AI made or not, probably was based on what other people were able to recreate and taking in account the company's past record.
Recently I've heard they've been using AI to generate, or at least, to translate blog posts.
That felt kind of strange, it feels strange to grind in a game or just end up unlocking something that was made by AI, feels like paying for expensive, fancy food and discovering it was microwaved, even if it tasted good or wasn't even expensive. I wouldn't care if I didn't know and I still kinda don't know if I do care. If AI didn't exist, would I care if whoever made that profile picture put passion into it? If they loved making it? If it was just what the corporate people and statistics told people would buy?
I sometimes think of making a game, I could learn the engine and coding but art would be too hard. AI would be a huge help, but I can't shake the feeling that it feels like cheating. But wouldn't buying someone's services be cheating too, in that scenario?
If I used AI to make it, then traced and retouched it, would it still be "wrong"?
Using AI to imagine things from scratch feels wrong, but I kinda understand and actually would like to use it one day to turn my ideas and designs into reality. "Create a plane design" and "Draw a plane according to these instructions" feel different.
Will using that make people lose jobs? I sure wouldn't have paid for someone's work, as I have no budget. But I guess that AI itself would lower their value, available people needing their work, and obviously, lower their pay.
But do I care? Would I care if I were an engineer and made a machine that could erase someone's job? I already get games through "other means", so why do I even care about all of that?
Would people care if art wasn't beloved by them in, say, the games they love? If all of that wasn't made a problem in the internet by artist that feared for their job, would people care? If some company made a product that makes it extremely easy to do an often expensive work, say on their house's roof or grid, would people care or would they buy and save on that cash?
I'm excited about the future, but scared as it will likely make competition harsher and mediocrity will be harder to achieve and maintain. People already have a low value in some areas or countries, AI sure will look appealing. Maybe some German or Swiss dude can work around an AI revolution, but can someone in less good countries? And even if their country helps, can they or do they want to work on a field that wasn't taken or wasn't made less valuable by AI?
I agree, with the games example there is something you can use, you can buy store bought assets and enviorments to use in games, and if you pay for them (or use free ones) its a 100% legit way to make a game, and infact many (even AAA games) use premade assets to save on time and money. Ai can bee seen in the same way, instead of searching the asset store for "generic man with gun for a fps" you tell a ai to generate a "generic man with gun for a fps"
Problem is its ok to use here and there when neccacary but when an entire game is made out of assets, is an asset flip. I think it goes without saying but asset flips are shit, and if you can make assets with ai then ai flips will be shit too because they would be made by the same people with the same goals, In my opionion (and i am just some jackass on the internet with no water behind it) ai will be semi common, but only rarely seen in major works and mostly prevalent in pumped out trash and i think that will happen regaurdless of how good the ai is. Phillip talked about album covers and there might be more and more of them being made with ai, but i dont think any major artists will make ai covers outside of gimmickey marketing.
Also the dataset problem too yeah they shouldent be using art without premission from the creators
The problem with AI art for me is that it can't communicate anything. The way it's made doesn't allow for that, you can only tell the AI, which has no experiences, tastes or thoughts, that it should make a picture that suggests emotions but doesn't actually contain them. It isn't anyones artwork in the end, nothing is communicated. If a person makes it, even if they don't care, their experiences and taste will still end up in the final artwork, and it is theirs, and contains something, even if it's not necessearily whats portraied.
@@ajankytoucan yeah ive seen that, there was that ai comic i saw a while back and it just felt kinda average, because the artist couldent really give it any unique vibes
well that was a depressing ending remark. But one thats already happening on sites like TikTok!
AI generated Short form content is here already. While its currently very shiet looking. It will start to get good. Soon what 2Klicksphilp said at the end will be real.
Probably by this time next year
Glad my job is not replaceable by Ai with a social and medical focus at mind.
I 100% agree with everything you said.
That music was your dad's? Wow. He's the new Kevin Macleod.
Hmmmm interesting video. I do think AI is scary, but probably that's also the reason why it is such an interesting topic to think and talk about!
It'll 100% make some people's lifes easier. It'll 100% take some of people's jobs. And 100% we will find a way to adapt to that!
I like to have more of positive outlook on this thing. Especially now when there are so many people announcing doom of some sort because of AI. We need something good to look towards :)
ah, nothing like watching my favorite youtuber suffer through the inevitable poison between the phenomenon of AI and humanity in REAL TIME :')
these videos will be recorded im history for the future as a window to the past, at a time when AI was slowly becoming integral part of culture and mankind as a whole in a bizarre and tedious transition
That makes no sense.
@@dantekiwi7926, after our generation, sure.
@@olivercharles2930 thanks
@@dantekiwi7926 That future sounds shit, I hope I'm dead by then.
As long as Kliksphilip keeps using Caboosing the way he does, it doesn't matter if AI is present in any way shape or form in the video.
TEY TOOK HIS JEEEWB
It will come for all professions. How crazy is it, that people don't know what is and isn't real anymore. It will be 1000 times that in 10 years. They won't even know if they are really talking to a family member on a video chat.
ai is fascinating and also scary.
it enables people to do things they only could have dreamed off, while at the same time leaving a big question mark for the future.
will ai lead us to a possible utopia or will it throw us in to the abyss, leaving the majority of humanity jobless and starving or worse, plot a dooms day scheme without us even knowing and before we realize we get wiped out.
oh and i also generate ai images.
"or will it us throw us in to the abyss, leaving the majority of humanity jobless and starving"
here's hoping communism becomes cool again.
I think the idea that it'd simultaneously take all of our jobs but leave us starving is a bit of a contradiction. If it's not providing food - then that's a job still available for humans or better-aligned AI.
damn, your family is next level
Your dad is so cool 🤘
Here's a video for you, Philip - the Steam hardware survey for November is out, and EVERY Intel and AMD card has market share growth, with nvidia's only real gains being budget, old-series, or laptop cards. Just a Black Friday anomaly?
Using AI for coding makes things so much simpler as a lot of the time it removes a lot of the tedious parts.
Using AI for coding made me want to quit coding, lol.
It knows the most general conventions of python and c++. Rust? Ruby? Don't even ask.