CELESTRON POWERSEEKER 114EQ TELESCOPE | UNBOXING | SPACE ARCADE | MARS | JUPITER | SATURN

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @scoutisabelle
    @scoutisabelle 2 роки тому +12

    Wow, the planets look great! Very detailed, especially Mars with the dark markings.

  • @donaldfiesta8666
    @donaldfiesta8666 Рік тому +1

    I have an older version ota which I replaced the secondary with a 1/16 wave mirror . Very nice knock about scope now.

  • @RakibulIslam-rm4ym
    @RakibulIslam-rm4ym Місяць тому +1

    great video!

  • @doomlord2014
    @doomlord2014 Рік тому +1

    Wow, I am going to buy this. I love how you have cheapest price! Please also show me deep sky objects if possible. Thank you! space arcade fan forever. I love the website which made me knowledgable about astrophotography equipments

  • @heitor3763
    @heitor3763 Рік тому +3

    if you are going to analyze your photograph mainly of the gas giants, I notice a chromatic aberration probably given by the excessive magnification as the opening of your telescope is 114 x 2 = 228x of maximum magnification, as you used a 4 mm eyepiece dividing by the focal length if has the zoom used approximately 900mm/4= 225x of amplification that is, it arrived very close to the limit of its telescope causing its chromatic aberration

    • @SpaceArcadeIND
      @SpaceArcadeIND  Рік тому +2

      Yes agreed. Thanks for the details.

    • @creeperjackcraft
      @creeperjackcraft Рік тому

      People said that the eyepiece that came with the telescope were not very good so they buy a better one so the results are better

  • @banuv4695
    @banuv4695 Рік тому +2

    Sir can you show deep sky objects through this telescope please

  • @VHSLemon-1
    @VHSLemon-1 Місяць тому

    Hey do you know where to find replacement parts for the little screw knobs that connect the telescope to the eq mount?

    • @SpaceArcadeIND
      @SpaceArcadeIND  13 днів тому

      Difficult to find exact knobs and screws. But you may reach out to local hardware stores for similar screws

  • @Pige0n13
    @Pige0n13 Рік тому

    What size are the nuts you put on the circles to hold the telescope

  • @SunilSharma-wl5op
    @SunilSharma-wl5op 2 роки тому +3

    Nice👍👏

  • @AnkahiTales
    @AnkahiTales 9 місяців тому

    Does it have tracking features

  • @seapupocean4799
    @seapupocean4799 Рік тому +1

    In your opinion, what is the absolute BEST quality telescope for under $350?

  • @alberteinstein8835
    @alberteinstein8835 7 місяців тому

    Did you buy some expensive eyepieces for that??

  • @BenArda10
    @BenArda10 Місяць тому

    80 eq or 114 eq Which one do you recommend

    • @SpaceArcadeIND
      @SpaceArcadeIND  Місяць тому +1

      Larger Aperture always pays off. Should choose 114EQ

    • @BenArda10
      @BenArda10 Місяць тому

      @SpaceArcadeIND thank you

  • @martinhronec
    @martinhronec Рік тому +1

    Celestron 'Patience' seeker 114 is a great telescope, but the mounting was probably made by Shakiras choreographer 😉

  • @Haydn_2005
    @Haydn_2005 2 роки тому +3

    Why does everything I zoom in on look terrible unlike yours.
    I have have the exact same telescope as you. Any tips??

    • @MOLLEJA117
      @MOLLEJA117 2 роки тому +4

      Get other eyepieces, a 2x or 3x barlow (Svbony makes great and relatively affordable products), don't go beyond the 270X magnification this telescope has to offer and collimate your telescope that will certainly help!

    • @Haydn_2005
      @Haydn_2005 2 роки тому +1

      @@MOLLEJA117 Ok I’ll look into that thanks

    • @SpaceArcadeIND
      @SpaceArcadeIND  Рік тому +1

      Hi... You need to first start with photography with the help of Smartphone Adapter and using all eyepieces interchangeably. Also phone optical zoom, plays an important. Sky conditions also matter, clear and transparent skies are needed for good quality planets photograph.

  • @matiasval7333
    @matiasval7333 4 місяці тому +1

    Why is my view upside down?? 😩 does anyone know??

    • @SpaceArcadeIND
      @SpaceArcadeIND  2 місяці тому

      Hi. Reflector telescopes by default have an inverted image view. It is normal in all telescope. Some telescope come with erecting eyepieces or erecting diagonal to erect (straighten) the image.

  • @staticmadness6643
    @staticmadness6643 Рік тому

    Are you saying that we need to use phone camera zoom to view planets ? It's not much of a telescope then is it ?

    • @SpaceArcadeIND
      @SpaceArcadeIND  Рік тому +1

      Hi. Not just phone camera, any camera DSLR or any other with a setting to vary exposure (ISO, Shutter Speed etc) and zooming capabilities , can give you better details and results. The same is also achieved by using planetary filters, which blocks certain colours to enhance the contrast of the planets.

  • @syckeehai1535
    @syckeehai1535 Рік тому

    how did u capture mara

  • @radbaron007
    @radbaron007 2 місяці тому

    looks like anti-tank guided missile :D

  • @crooked-halo
    @crooked-halo Рік тому +5

    Saw a used model of this for $75 and, thinking it’s a bargain, have been researching this reflector telescope. 95% of what I’ve read from telescope people is that the 114 EQ is a very low quality, almost unusable scope! I literally have a hard time finding anything positive, except from those selling or promoting it. Do your research before buying any telescope!

    • @crooked-halo
      @crooked-halo Рік тому

      @user-ro6lq9ce9z "do YOUR research, BUD." I did, as can be inferred by the words in my comment "have been researching this.."

    • @creeperjackcraft
      @creeperjackcraft Рік тому

      astromaster 114eq and powerseeker 114eq is a different telescope

    • @seapupocean4799
      @seapupocean4799 Рік тому +2

      Have you found one that was better quality (for under $1000)? I thought I’d finally found a good one, but it seems I hit a snag every time I think that

    • @creeperjackcraft
      @creeperjackcraft Рік тому +1

      @@seapupocean4799 this guy only says 114eq. He didn't say whether if its astromaster 114eq or powerseeker 114eq. Astromaster 114eq is far worse than Powerseeker 114eq because the astromaster 114eq is a bird jones telescope, avoid the bird jones telescope.

  • @pedroosvaldoramirezmurguia8554
    @pedroosvaldoramirezmurguia8554 10 місяців тому

    Esté telescopio tiene sus defectos el enfocador es de muy mala calidad trae mucho juego lo que provoca una desalineacion entre el ocular y el espejo secundario el buscador es muy difícil alinearlo

  • @AstroRVe
    @AstroRVe 9 місяців тому

    My F70060 can do way better than this