The Mark of the Beast in its Context

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @BlackJuck
    @BlackJuck 9 місяців тому +4

    666 most likely represented nero at a time when using his real name in disrespect was a criminal offense and since nero had a habit of murdering people, jews and christians alike used this to talk about him without being persecuted. But not even the romans liked nero, so this “mark of the beast” just became a reference to persecutory emperors of later years.

    • @talismanskulls2857
      @talismanskulls2857 9 місяців тому

      No, it was a key referring to king Solomon and his taxation of 666 talents of gold and so on more or less over taxing everyone and leading his kingdom to its own downfall. It was being used as a metaphor that Rome and its ruling families were following the same course (which it did) and would collapse under its own weight (which it did).

    • @mayanstevenson4829
      @mayanstevenson4829 2 місяці тому

      Here's the way I was taught to interpret 666. First and foremost, 666 is six hundred sixty, and six (600 60 and 6). Understanding is given through precepts. What book, chapter, and verses give more understanding to these numbers? 600 is when God floods earth to destroy man for evil thoughts. 60 is when man worships man as God (King of Babylon). 6 is when man was created. In other words, man worshipping man as God (idolatry) leads to divine wrath and punishment. Satan is the father of lies; therefore, an idol is a symbol of Satan. 600 60 and 6 ultimately sums up to the complete and total worship of Satan. 666 = Satan.

  • @TheLookingGlassAU
    @TheLookingGlassAU 9 місяців тому +6

    What if the call to solve the riddles of rev 13 and rev 17 was a dog whistle to gnostic Christians as if to say "you think you have nous? You think you have sophia? Ok false prophets work this out"

  • @Fix_Bayonets
    @Fix_Bayonets 9 місяців тому +1

    What are your thoughts on Walid Shoebats interpretation that it Arabic letters and not Greek numbers? He thinks it is the Islamic creed warriors of Jihad take on head bands as we have seen much of lately with Hamas.

    • @Fix_Bayonets
      @Fix_Bayonets 9 місяців тому

      ua-cam.com/video/GtquNNEO7Fw/v-deo.htmlsi=ZjwZjQV4y92fPKky

  • @paulmicks7097
    @paulmicks7097 9 місяців тому +2

    Pulled the good from the bible then put it aside and research and explore God's universe.

  • @thesupremekingdragonzarc7289
    @thesupremekingdragonzarc7289 9 місяців тому

    Use Gematria and you get Emperor Nero

  • @TboneWTF
    @TboneWTF 9 місяців тому +1

    In my entire life I have never seen this "mark of the beast" on any individual. Does that mean every one I have met is NOT under some demonic spell? Or does it mean that no such "mark" exists and you are sorely mistaken? Uhmm let me think. Which makes more sense? I will have to go with the latter idea. You are sorely mistaken. LOL. Good luck.

  • @NotNecessarily-ip4vc
    @NotNecessarily-ip4vc 9 місяців тому

    The Bible is about sons of El (Elohim).
    (not to be confused with Genesis 6 "sons of Elohim" which are sons of the false Elohim from Genesis 2)
    If you read or were told that the Bible is about God (El) that's...not wrong... but still has been altered/changed from the original Word which is Elohim.
    It's incredibly important that nobody alter or change scriptures so the meaning is not lost. Now everyone thinks the Bible itself is the Word of God instead of Elohim from Genesis 1. What a contradictory mess.
    Keep in mind that Elohim has two uses. One is in the plural context (gods) and one in the possessive context (God's). How do I know this? I just use the definitions of the Latin counterparts of God's titles which weren't "syncretized" by the harlot of Babylon.
    The Hebrews originally said "the Names of God are too Holy to be read or spoken aloud"...then, they altered/changed scriptures. Everyone's Bibles are copies of copies of altered/changed scripture from Babylon; inserting the Tetragrammaton in place of Yahweh’s stupid Name and syncretizing God's titles to just mean El (God).
    For millenia before the Old Testament the word Elohim always and only meant "sons of El".
    "In the beginning Elohim created heaven and earth"...(is what you should see in your Bibles if they cared about Truth). Use the NOG translation it's on Bible Gateway. Uncensored.
    The Bible originally introduced Yahweh as an Elohim (Deity), not El (Deus). Yahweh says "I am Yahweh your Elohim" like a thousand times in the OT. The "no two powers in heaven" argument was argued by people whose Bibles say "El" everywhere instead of "Elohim", nullifying the argument.
    Yahweh Elohim from Genesis 2 was adopted into the Bronze Age pantheon of Israel (Canaan) from the broader Levantine polytheism. That's the false Elohim.
    Please Google Yahweh’s historical religion called Yahwism its a polytheistic religion of Iron Age Israelites. The Mt Ebal curse tablet has YHWH "Yahweh" as just YHW "Yaw". This is the same as Yaw from the Baal Cycle who was originally named Yam (Canaanite word for Sea).
    The purpose of the Bible is knowing Good from Evil, Truth from the Lie and Genesis 1 Chosen (Christ in Latin) Elohim from Genesis 2 adopted, false Yahweh Elohim.
    The clever snake in Genesis 3 knew Elohim (title) from Yahweh Elohim (name)...

    • @k9ine999
      @k9ine999 9 місяців тому

      What point are you trying to make?

  • @truthbehindthelie7511
    @truthbehindthelie7511 9 місяців тому +1

    Try thinking A STRUCTURE!!! A FRAM, LUCIFER'S LEGS BROKE AND HE TOOK GOD WITH HIM RIGHT? AN APPARATUS!!! THE MOTHER HAD TWO SONS ONE MADE BIG THINGS THAT HARMED THE CHILDREN OF GOD, THE OTHER BROTHER SHRUNK THEM DOWN!! STOP PUTTING A GENDER TO THIS, A HUMAN TO THIS ,AND YOU MIGHT UNDERSTAND THIS!!!