So she can't get through to her ex, and sees police tape on his street..... And she doesn't make sure her kids are okay? "Oh, I'll just go to lunch." Yeah, right.
So they just proved she drove by her ex husband house after he was shot and she lied on the stand! She definitely knew about the murder why else would she drive by! I hope this awful family get some kind of charges after this! They all plot his murder!
@@tinahernandez9374 one that works in a coffee shop, according to her LACASSE, her former boyfriend. He actually said that in his testimony: he taught during the day and she worked in a coffee shop. Unless that's a euphemism for something else.
Its time for perjury for Wendi. Plus murder for her and her family. I cant believe she got on the stand and lied like that. Then to change her kids last names, end the kids contact with his family.... that is pure evil.
That's a brilliant move by the prosecution! Put the Adelson's phone numbers out there so everyone can blow up their phones and make them change their numbers!
I think the 11:40 call and the drive to Danny's street is Wendi getting cold feet, only it had already happened. But she knew exactly what her brother set up.
@@terancetheindomitable9701 I do think she wanted to keep herself removed from it. She let her family know what needed to happen- she just couldn’t stand dealing with markel and not being able to move - so mom and brother took care of it for her. Now they’ll go down for her too.
The detective handled himself very well especially considering the juvenile antics displayed by the defense attorney he was dealing with. I mean really? The defense was mad because they were losing so what does he do? try and discredit the guy out the gate because he's married to a prosecutor, I believe the one prosecuting this case, ot sure what that has to do with the price of tea in China, but I guess he was trying to plant food for thought in the minds of the jurors. He came off like a disrepectful sore loser. LOL
I've been watching the trial from the beginning to this point. Maybe I'm dense but I'm having a hard time following the details. Is it just me or are they going all over the place? In other trials I've watched there was a much more coherent narrative and I understood what each side was trying to assert.
I find it strange that majority of the questions in this trial seems to be targeting proving involvement of Adelson's family and not to show that evidences against the defendants are void. The trial is about the defendants, no? What are the evidences against them at all? It looks like investigation of Adelson's family, not a trial, but shouldn't it all have been done prior to the trial - questioning all the witnesses about Adelsons' alibis, etc ? strange.. and the Garcia's attorneys do not look extremely professional to me as well.. It is hard to take this trial seriously to be honest..
I too was wondering that! I'm not sure, but I was wondering if the defense is trying to go after the adailson (sp) family, to get the focus of their clients? 🤷🤦 Make them take the blame... I am so glad that I'm NOT a juror on here... No way could I stay focus, geeze!
Love a judge that controls his courtroom...not the biggest complainer... go judge!!
This judge is phenomenal
Chris Corbett was fantastic - he is just great at his job and explaining things. He is also very personable with a lovely smile - with his eyes 😊
So she can't get through to her ex, and sees police tape on his street..... And she doesn't make sure her kids are okay?
"Oh, I'll just go to lunch."
Yeah, right.
Remember this stuff when Donna Adelson trial coming up 👍
Exactly
Sgt. Corbett is trying not to laugh at this stupid defense attorney’s ridiculous questions!!🤣
So they just proved she drove by her ex husband house after he was shot and she lied on the stand! She definitely knew about the murder why else would she drive by! I hope this awful family get some kind of charges after this! They all plot his murder!
Wonder what kind of a lawyer she is?
@@tinahernandez9374 The conspiratorial kind.
@@edwinlandmast255 Hahahaha
@@a.b.d.3974 Please proof read before posting your comment. I am left guessing the point you are trying to make.
@@tinahernandez9374 one that works in a coffee shop, according to her LACASSE, her former boyfriend. He actually said that in his testimony: he taught during the day and she worked in a coffee shop. Unless that's a euphemism for something else.
I love the telephone tracking, but what really gets me going are the cameras on buses.
Get this defense attorney a ladder because he’s reaching 😂🤣
haHAAA
It certainly sounds like they actually don't know much about cellphone information
Why hasn’t Wendi and her family not been charged?
Because it's Florida and they have money.
Wendi's brother was arrested and charged back in April and it's just a matter of time before the rest of the family are in court
Its time for perjury for Wendi. Plus murder for her and her family.
I cant believe she got on the stand and lied like that.
Then to change her kids last names, end the kids contact with his family.... that is pure evil.
Perjury!?
More like conspiracy.
Who else would fore plan to ensure safety of her kids and therefore have foreknowledge of Mr Markels routine?
I wonder what sedative the Adelson family takes.
"THE EX- WIFE, THE EX-WIFE...guilty as sin!!"
I agree!
This attorney asked the stupidest questions waist of time
Wendi has a problem........
Miss Wendi was obviously not a very good attorney she literally laid out the planning and her involvement to the T.
I've been watching this trial on here and did a double take when I saw this witness's name. My name is Chris Corbett!
😂
YRS! I LOVE THIS JUDGE!!
GREAT WITNESS...CONGRATS!!
When did her realtor call her and why is it not on the call list? Seems it was before the first call listed here.
That's a brilliant move by the prosecution! Put the Adelson's phone numbers out there so everyone can blow up their phones and make them change their numbers!
I think the 11:40 call and the drive to Danny's street is Wendi getting cold feet, only it had already happened. But she knew exactly what her brother set up.
That's ridiculous. Wendi was making sure the job was DONE. You really think Charlie was the driving force behind this? Those ain't his kids.
@@terancetheindomitable9701
You were saying?
Charlie was just arrested for murder.
@@terancetheindomitable9701 I do think she wanted to keep herself removed from it. She let her family know what needed to happen- she just couldn’t stand dealing with markel and not being able to move - so mom and brother took care of it for her. Now they’ll go down for her too.
So defendant Garcia called Harvey Adelson on July 1st. Timestamp 28:20.
Who else calling the Adelson family??
Diddo Diddo 😂😂
Only compete morons would.
Anyone who thinks the family is innocent is a complete idiot.
@17:10 … “move on, have a seat” 😅😅😅
The detective handled himself very well especially considering the juvenile antics displayed by the defense attorney he was dealing with. I mean really? The defense was mad because they were losing so what does he do? try and discredit the guy out the gate because he's married to a prosecutor, I believe the one prosecuting this case, ot sure what that has to do with the price of tea in China, but I guess he was trying to plant food for thought in the minds of the jurors. He came off like a disrepectful sore loser. LOL
Love Chris Corben
Corbett
I've been watching the trial from the beginning to this point. Maybe I'm dense but I'm having a hard time following the details. Is it just me or are they going all over the place? In other trials I've watched there was a much more coherent narrative and I understood what each side was trying to assert.
Well, I get your point.... There are two defendants.... So each defense attorney has different things that they want to focus on.
I don't want to say you are dense but....
I find it strange that majority of the questions in this trial seems to be targeting proving involvement of Adelson's family and not to show that evidences against the defendants are void. The trial is about the defendants, no? What are the evidences against them at all? It looks like investigation of Adelson's family, not a trial, but shouldn't it all have been done prior to the trial - questioning all the witnesses about Adelsons' alibis, etc ? strange.. and the Garcia's attorneys do not look extremely professional to me as well.. It is hard to take this trial seriously to be honest..
I too was wondering that! I'm not sure, but I was wondering if the defense is trying to go after the adailson (sp) family, to get the focus of their clients? 🤷🤦 Make them take the blame... I am so glad that I'm NOT a juror on here... No way could I stay focus, geeze!
It’s because the Adelson’s are the driving force in the murder, at this point they are just trying to lay out how everyone is connected for the jury
The guy defendant is already toast and everyone knows it. They really want the instigators of the murder, which is the family.
Why are Wendi and Donna smiling like it’s first day of school photos on the sign behind the Sargent? Those aren’t mug shots are they?
They're probably driver's license photos. No Adelsons had been arrested and had mug shots taken at the time of this trial.
Guess what?? This handsome witness is Georgia C husband! I think~ Listen to 44:08
No he is married to someone that works with the prosecutor