the racquets they sell us are different then the ones the players use. I went into a store and the guy knows I play with the K factor 90. He says to me "want the new Fed racquet? It's got more power. Why do you think Federer likes it?" and I said "Fed's racquet is different then the consumer racquet." He didn't know what to say because he knows I am right. The point is, don't choose a racquet because of who uses it. Choose a racquet that's right for you.
I love it too, but in the 3:22 point Federer reverses and wins the point from a backhand duel, with a single top-spin backhand. I wonder if Gasquet's backhand is as good as it was a few years ago.
WTF. You showed ONE side of the match!!! I love Gasquet esPESCIALLY when he and Fed play. They are VERY similar in style and THIS was a match you should HIGHLIGHT. It was GORGEOUS!!!!Aren't YOU the Tennis people?? You should educate future generations on this. Both of their styles are almost antiquated yet they remain in the top of the field. Why is that? Why is Gasquet's backhand so powerful and accurate? Why is Federer 36, not muscular, #2 in the world with a ONE handed back hand?? DO IT!!!!
Well..!! I am seeing & have a feeling that NEO backhand is on its way..!! 👌👌 He will ✨ start those neo backhand machine that he was..!! Go roger Fed20..!! 🎾🎾 🎾
2:40 I was REALLY hoping for that ball to be in so it would interrupt Federer mid bite LOL Wanted him to put the snack bar on hold and be like *sigh*...
The highlights are pretty one sided favouring Roger. They showed Gasquet win like a couple of points and completly ignored the points where Gasquet broke back in the third. Please post more impartial highlights for future matches.
Manish Babu winners 27-42. UEs 16-30. That's +11 gasquet and + 12 Roger, many from lopsided aces count. Australian Open TV please present more balanced highlights.
I've been thinking the same .. its like they only show the winning shots of the winner and TOTALLY never show any winning shots of the match loser for most of the matches .. thats really quite disrespectful to the losers who deserves at least some highlight moments too ..
Tons of unforced errors from the backhand wing... but something really admirable... stepped up another gear when he got broken in the 3rd set... finished the third set when he wanted to rather than taking it to tb... I think that extra gear in the end of the third should be sufficient to take the trophy home!!
Gasquet's main problem lies in his playing style. Just sticks to the baseline and keeps hitting topspin on forehands. That's not gonna hurt any of the top guys. His backhand is good but the serve and forehand lets him down. Anyways, another great win for the G.O.A.T. Grand Slam No. 20 on the cards
I am a roger fan, but I don't like watching this highlights. It's one sided. Richard played some amazing points as well. The match was much closer than what they depict in this highlights.
So basically Richard had only 1 good winnner during those 3 sets right? Comon guys, can you do more objective highlights and not just highlighting the best shots of Roger please? You know I mean...
So this is the second highlights video I am seeing (the first official one). Both of their comments section had one thing in common, something along the lines that Nadal will beat Federer in a possible encounter in the near future. I am a big fan of both of them, but here's the thing. The same has been said during every tournament where there was a chance of a possible encounter, right from AO 2017 to Indian Wells to Miami to Shanghai, but it never happened. Roger can and does easily step up his power game when he needs to, the entire previous season is a hint to that. By the time the Miami final was conducted, Roger was completely exhausted with continuous tournaments (quite visible from the dip in his form), yet he beat Nadal in the final. I don't know man, these absurdly wild and pretty much the same predictions that people make on every video that has Federer's name on it, has really made me question people's ability to comprehend statistical data. But yeah, may the best player win.
Ethan istanforCBE I absolutely agree with your point of no favourites. And it's good to have opinions that aren't biased, so yeah I appreciate your view. Though I feel, Federer is in sublime form, taking it easy in the early rounds.
Best to ignore those. People sometimes were so negative towards tennis players and full of hatreds coming out of nowhere. They have no appreciation to this beautiful sport.
I agree but this time i feel Nadal has the game to beat fed this Year and maybe already at AO but they have to beat many other great players still to give us a dream final again....
To be fair, at the AO, and especially at IW and Miami it was constantly Roger who was playing better tennis. Now that's not the case, Nadal is playing the best tennis atm by far. The glimpse of hope I like to cling onto is the 2017 Shanghai final, because that was real footage of Roger stepping up his game. Nadal was on fire all week, hadn't dropped serve once. Roger was struggling, lost a set to Delpo. Yet in that final Roger just stepped up his game like a madman and blasted Rafa off the court.
We love Nadal AND Federer--and both will be in god-mode at the final. Subscribe for daily (2-4/vids day) commentary. ua-cam.com/channels/jqBETkaPDmMhT2XP4yyvGw.htmlfeatured?view_as=subscriber
I'm a huge Federer fan, however, I must stay that he is looking far from his best at the moment. That being said, as age passes, he has become even more unpredictable. He has looked rusty so far, nothing compared to last year, however, as a champion, he has this ability to raise the bar every time when under duress. He proved that last year. The backhand needs to start firing as a major weapon again. So far, it has not. But still BEL20VE!!!!
The guys who compile these highlight videos are biased af !! Like comeon I know fed won but Gasquet must have hit a few winners to score those points ! The whole thing looks like a compilation by one of Federer fan boys !!!
AO really loves Federer arent they.... im not a hater and i like Roger but Why is AO ONLY putting him at night session and on RLA i mean he is the GOAT but Please give him a day match Because these night matches are really good for him for the next rounds.... (physically) and Nadal and stuff have to play day matches WHERE the weather is really hot.
Roy Boy AO gives Federer preferential treatment and people hate Federer for it..great logical minds. But think this - Federer has been and still is the biggest crowd puller over past 15 years now. When Federer plays, TV ratings are higher than other matches. Organisations have to make money obviously, its a business. Last year at AO he played in couple of day matches due to lower ranking.
K G as i said at the beginning of my comment i love fed.... but AO and other tournaments have to stop giving fed these kind of things, if we look at Novak as an example, he has ONLY played one match on RLA (i think correct me if im wrong) i know he is the number 16 in the world rn but come on he has won AO 6 times ffs
Roy Boy Nadal has to play matches early, which isn't much worse than Roger. It's Nole who has the right to complain, since he has to play at the worst times.
But i agree with you, that this is not all about Fed but aswell for money and stuf and indeed he played day matches last Year, but as it said, it is last year so Yeah...
Rodger knows exactly how to play the frenchman Gasquet. Richard serves to slow and makes to much lifts on hard court, such a damage for my countrie. But french men have never win a gran slam since 1983.
I'm not convinced by Federer's performance so far - Berdych, if he plays solid like he did today (and doesn't have a mental breakdown), will take him out in straight sets.
His backhand is suspect, a lot of UE errors today from that side, but noway Berdych is going win if they both meet at the quarters, Djokovic looks a lot more solid and would be the favorite if they met in the semi finals.
Roger Federer is playing avg tennis this year. He is committing lot of unforced errors. Backhand is worst. His problem is his conversion of Break Points. Percent of break point conversion is very less. He is not going to win AO this year. He will be out in 4th round or QF. Nadal will win AO for sure
Truth 2016 in the finals WITHOUT LOSING A SET. And don’t tell me the level of competition is down, cause going to the finals without losing a set is still a pretty damn good accomplishment
I thought NADAL got easy draw but look at Federer one of the easiest draw ever in tennis history....and night sessions play...wow cake walk wins for Federer another billion dollar money in his pocket.....
Roger could have had so many more titles to his name had it not been for Drug Novak Djkovic. Now that Novak Djkovic has stopped taking boost he is not competitive anymore. If he wins this one then drug test will reveal everything!!
everytime fed play well, wether it be wimbledon 2014, 2015.. us open 2015,, or aus open 2016. all know what happens in all those matches... djokovic is too good.
Roger could have had so many more titles to his name had it not been for Drug Novak Djkovic. Now that Novak Djkovic has stopped taking boost he is not competitive anymore. If he wins this one then drug test will reveal everything!!
I wouldn't have minded seeing more clips of Gasquet's winners. Still, thanks for putting this up.
Thomas Creeley yeah like more than one.
Fake. I have Federer's racket and it doesn't play like that.
neophytosdm Gold comment XD
Pornstar Federer
LOL, best comment ever
made in China?
the racquets they sell us are different then the ones the players use. I went into a store and the guy knows I play with the K factor 90. He says to me "want the new Fed racquet? It's got more power. Why do you think Federer likes it?" and I said "Fed's racquet is different then the consumer racquet." He didn't know what to say because he knows I am right. The point is, don't choose a racquet because of who uses it. Choose a racquet that's right for you.
Gasquet backhand is a piece of art
I love it too, but in the 3:22 point Federer reverses and wins the point from a backhand duel, with a single top-spin backhand. I wonder if Gasquet's backhand is as good as it was a few years ago.
Federer - happily destroying 80s born players' careers since 2003. Roddick, Hewitt, Nalbandian, Tsonga, Gasquet, Berdych, the list goes on.... 2 notorious exceptions remain of course!
WTF. You showed ONE side of the match!!! I love Gasquet esPESCIALLY when he and Fed play. They are VERY similar in style and THIS was a match you should HIGHLIGHT. It was GORGEOUS!!!!Aren't YOU the Tennis people?? You should educate future generations on this. Both of their styles are almost antiquated yet they remain in the top of the field. Why is that? Why is Gasquet's backhand so powerful and accurate? Why is Federer 36, not muscular, #2 in the world with a ONE handed back hand?? DO IT!!!!
Effortlessly graceful
@Australian Open TV Put highlights from BOTH players. Then your HL will be top class.
0:55 I have probably tried that like 1000 times in my life, never nailed it that good.
ОТГОВОР
Teo The773 ×2
Well, he is the best of all times and you are nobody.
2:49 i have done this highlight many times
Well..!!
I am seeing & have a feeling that
NEO backhand is on its way..!! 👌👌
He will ✨ start those neo backhand machine that he was..!!
Go roger Fed20..!! 🎾🎾 🎾
I love this man name roger federer .Great inspiration
2:40 I was REALLY hoping for that ball to be in so it would interrupt Federer mid bite LOL
Wanted him to put the snack bar on hold and be like *sigh*...
Can you stop showing highlights of ONE player every time? For example, you showed Federer win his shot virtually every time.
GOAT!!!🙏🏽
Pas un seul point gagnant de Gasquet, pourtant remonté de 4/1 à 4/4 au troisième set. Des highlights plus équilibrées , c'est pas interdit....😁
3:56 マッチポイントがお互いに凄い
Gasquet is world class and Fed just toys with him.
Good job
Federer was lucky at the second set when the hawk-eye sistem broke on his second serve that looked way out,but anyway good match from him.
Go maestro
The highlights are pretty one sided favouring Roger. They showed Gasquet win like a couple of points and completly ignored the points where Gasquet broke back in the third. Please post more impartial highlights for future matches.
Manish Babu winners 27-42. UEs 16-30. That's +11 gasquet and + 12 Roger, many from lopsided aces count. Australian Open TV please present more balanced highlights.
I've been thinking the same .. its like they only show the winning shots of the winner and TOTALLY never show any winning shots of the match loser for most of the matches .. thats really quite disrespectful to the losers who deserves at least some highlight moments too ..
I thought the same when I watch the score, it was 4-1 and suddenly they where 4-4 without showing a single point from Gasquet.
Money talk!!! You can as they can ignore you.
I watched this highlights only because of Roger's Play. you too...?
Tons of unforced errors from the backhand wing... but something really admirable... stepped up another gear when he got broken in the 3rd set... finished the third set when he wanted to rather than taking it to tb... I think that extra gear in the end of the third should be sufficient to take the trophy home!!
Please show highlights not "Federer hitting Winners"
Gasquet's main problem lies in his playing style. Just sticks to the baseline and keeps hitting topspin on forehands. That's not gonna hurt any of the top guys. His backhand is good but the serve and forehand lets him down. Anyways, another great win for the G.O.A.T. Grand Slam No. 20 on the cards
0:55-sick inside out backhand down the line winner
Thats not inside put
Out*
I am a roger fan, but I don't like watching this highlights. It's one sided. Richard played some amazing points as well. The match was much closer than what they depict in this highlights.
Ladies &Gentlemen: THE GREATEST OF ALL TIMES ...
So basically Richard had only 1 good winnner during those 3 sets right? Comon guys, can you do more objective highlights and not just highlighting the best shots of Roger please? You know I mean...
AKA only Federer highlights and none from Gasquet
Gasquet moving like he always knew he'd lose
if roger can improve his back hand by 20% he will win.....scary times ahead for the aging superstar!!!
Federer will win his 20th grandslam soon, just wait for it.
Don't jinx it.
Come on the third point
show some respect to the loserthere are many good points from Gasquet
Gasquet is a shadow of himself. Federer used used to admire his backhand
Just like 2017....Federer again.
So this is the second highlights video I am seeing (the first official one). Both of their comments section had one thing in common, something along the lines that Nadal will beat Federer in a possible encounter in the near future. I am a big fan of both of them, but here's the thing. The same has been said during every tournament where there was a chance of a possible encounter, right from AO 2017 to Indian Wells to Miami to Shanghai, but it never happened. Roger can and does easily step up his power game when he needs to, the entire previous season is a hint to that. By the time the Miami final was conducted, Roger was completely exhausted with continuous tournaments (quite visible from the dip in his form), yet he beat Nadal in the final. I don't know man, these absurdly wild and pretty much the same predictions that people make on every video that has Federer's name on it, has really made me question people's ability to comprehend statistical data. But yeah, may the best player win.
Ethan istanforCBE I absolutely agree with your point of no favourites. And it's good to have opinions that aren't biased, so yeah I appreciate your view. Though I feel, Federer is in sublime form, taking it easy in the early rounds.
Best to ignore those. People sometimes were so negative towards tennis players and full of hatreds coming out of nowhere. They have no appreciation to this beautiful sport.
I agree but this time i feel Nadal has the game to beat fed this Year and maybe already at AO but they have to beat many other great players still to give us a dream final again....
To be fair, at the AO, and especially at IW and Miami it was constantly Roger who was playing better tennis. Now that's not the case, Nadal is playing the best tennis atm by far. The glimpse of hope I like to cling onto is the 2017 Shanghai final, because that was real footage of Roger stepping up his game. Nadal was on fire all week, hadn't dropped serve once. Roger was struggling, lost a set to Delpo. Yet in that final Roger just stepped up his game like a madman and blasted Rafa off the court.
We love Nadal AND Federer--and both will be in god-mode at the final. Subscribe for daily (2-4/vids day) commentary. ua-cam.com/channels/jqBETkaPDmMhT2XP4yyvGw.htmlfeatured?view_as=subscriber
Le tennis français dans toute sa splendeur comme d'habitude... Tsonga est reparti vendre des buenos...
I'm a huge Federer fan, however, I must stay that he is looking far from his best at the moment. That being said, as age passes, he has become even more unpredictable. He has looked rusty so far, nothing compared to last year, however, as a champion, he has this ability to raise the bar every time when under duress. He proved that last year. The backhand needs to start firing as a major weapon again. So far, it has not. But still BEL20VE!!!!
4 hours
Rare match
so many come ons from Fed
weird
holy shi 0:55
I know thats a nice view to appreciate his backhand down the line 😍
RF the BEST!!!!
0:12 where was the line call on that serve? :)
That cracked me up
Ikr, first time i saw it i thought it was a serve and then i had to look at it again
haha...It was not a service, they were already in the rally.
yeah that was the joke lol
Yep! haha
The "serve" at the begining, bad cut guys haha
Richard played really good but federer played even better
Vamos nadal
W
why There ist federer goods points?
0:50 Wonderful
The guys who compile these highlight videos are biased af !! Like comeon I know fed won but Gasquet must have hit a few winners to score those points ! The whole thing looks like a compilation by one of Federer fan boys !!!
내가 본 페더러 경기 중에 가장 변칙적이고 화려한 경기
Federer the best!
I hope for Djokovic Federer SF but then Djoker must win from likely Thiem. Federer Nadal i expect will be final ao 2018 where Roger will win it again.
0:52 やばすぎる
these highlights are so biased, its like gasquet didnt play one nice shot
Jan verwendeman yesssss!
Lol. This was more like a federer highlight than a match highlight. It only showed 2 points won by gasquet, the rest was all federer.
AO really loves Federer arent they.... im not a hater and i like Roger but Why is AO ONLY putting him at night session and on RLA i mean he is the GOAT but Please give him a day match Because these night matches are really good for him for the next rounds.... (physically) and Nadal and stuff have to play day matches WHERE the weather is really hot.
Roy Boy AO gives Federer preferential treatment and people hate Federer for it..great logical minds. But think this - Federer has been and still is the biggest crowd puller over past 15 years now. When Federer plays, TV ratings are higher than other matches. Organisations have to make money obviously, its a business. Last year at AO he played in couple of day matches due to lower ranking.
K G as i said at the beginning of my comment i love fed.... but AO and other tournaments have to stop giving fed these kind of things, if we look at Novak as an example, he has ONLY played one match on RLA (i think correct me if im wrong) i know he is the number 16 in the world rn but come on he has won AO 6 times ffs
Roy Boy Nadal has to play matches early, which isn't much worse than Roger. It's Nole who has the right to complain, since he has to play at the worst times.
But i agree with you, that this is not all about Fed but aswell for money and stuf and indeed he played day matches last Year, but as it said, it is last year so Yeah...
John E so he gets a higher privilege than Rafa and Dimitrov then??
Rodger knows exactly how to play the frenchman Gasquet. Richard serves to slow and makes to much lifts on hard court, such a damage for my countrie. But french men have never win a gran slam since 1983.
Roger Federer makes it look so easy.
Only good points of federer
Federer’s legs
His pornstar leg
Similar type of tennis player.Federer always win.Poor Gasquet.
instagram brought me here
Yea lets make a highlight of federer double faulting. Everybody wants to see that right? 😒
I'm not convinced by Federer's performance so far - Berdych, if he plays solid like he did today (and doesn't have a mental breakdown), will take him out in straight sets.
hg82met no fucking way
His backhand is suspect, a lot of UE errors today from that side, but noway Berdych is going win if they both meet at the quarters, Djokovic looks a lot more solid and would be the favorite if they met in the semi finals.
you're a genius, NBC should replace McEnroe with you.
hg82met Genius.
Et genre Richard il a pas fait un point ? On montre même les fautes de Federer ... Nan mais WTF
Roger Federer is playing avg tennis this year. He is committing lot of unforced errors. Backhand is worst.
His problem is his conversion of Break Points. Percent of break point conversion is very less. He is not going to win AO this year. He will be out in 4th round or QF. Nadal will win AO for sure
Truth 2016 He will be out in the 4th round our quarterfinals! Are you for real? Get off here!
Truth 2016 in the finals WITHOUT LOSING A SET. And don’t tell me the level of competition is down, cause going to the finals without losing a set is still a pretty damn good accomplishment
Truth 2016 Yeah, whatever.
Federer never good, poor mans sampras
Trop facile pour Roger
I don’t think the courts are playing as fast as last year
they didn't change the surface, did they?
IAMSOUND99 it’s apparently the same surface but it’s obvious, from comparing highlights to last year, that it isn’t playing as fast.
ガスケ これ以上は なさそう
Gasquet's strokes are beautifully rounded but lacks much weight of aggression and his footwork is really bad, like really really bad ... sad ..
I thought NADAL got easy draw but look at Federer one of the easiest draw ever in tennis history....and night sessions play...wow cake walk wins for Federer another billion dollar money in his pocket.....
Roger could have had so many more titles to his name had it not been for Drug Novak Djkovic. Now that Novak Djkovic has stopped taking boost he is not competitive anymore. If he wins this one then drug test will reveal everything!!
Subsctibe
Even i have better forehand than gasquet. His fh is garbage
Federer's celebration makes me cringe so much
Abstar Galaxy why ??
Ertugrul Körpinar idk.
you must cringe at a ton of bullshit if a simple celebration "triggers" you.
you should see Cristiano Ronaldo celebrations for more cringe
IAMSOUND99 why did you have to swear?
come on fed, cheering for u. but djokovic will be too good for you.
Ethan istanforCBE based on novak's today performance. and based on previous years meetings..
Battle of pornstars. How far can Federer and Djokovic cum ?
neha chauhan You're not cheering for Roger. Fake fan. If you would actually watch the matches you would see Roger is playing better
Novak hasn't been tested yet you dummy. And Gasquet played stellar tennis at times.
everytime fed play well, wether it be wimbledon 2014, 2015.. us open 2015,, or aus open 2016. all know what happens in all those matches... djokovic is too good.
Roger could have had so many more titles to his name had it not been for Drug Novak Djkovic. Now that Novak Djkovic has stopped taking boost he is not competitive anymore. If he wins this one then drug test will reveal everything!!