Baltimore Key Bridge Collapse: Aerials show work to clear debris

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 кві 2024
  • SKYFOX images show the wreckage of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge as crews work to clear debris from the collapse site on Tuesday, April 16, 2024.
    DETAILS: tinyurl.com/2coyrlsn
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    STAY CONNECTED AND STAY AHEAD WITH FOX 5 DC
    Subscribe to FOX 5 DC on UA-cam » ua-cam.com/channels/x5dc.html?su...
    Read the latest local and national news on fox5dc.com » fox5dc.com/
    Watch FOX 5 DC programming live » fox5dc.com/live
    Get your local forecast from the FOX 5 DC Weather team » www.fox5dc.com/weather
    Learn how to follow us on social media, download our news and weather mobile apps, find us on your Smart TV and sign up for our daily newsletter » fox5dc.com/connect-with-fox-5...
    Follow FOX 5 DC on Facebook » / fox5dc
    Follow FOX 5 DC on Twitter » / fox5dc
    Follow FOX 5 DC Instagram » / fox5dc
    Vote in the daily FOX 5 DC InstaPoll » fox5dc.com/instapoll
    FOX 5 DC, WTTG-TV and FOX 5 PLUS, WDCA-TV are owned-and-operated TV stations of the Fox Broadcasting Company. We are located in Washington, D.C. and serves the entire Washington metropolitan area (including Northern Virginia, Maryland, and the Martinsburg, West Virginia area). Our studio is based in Bethesda, Maryland.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @jefwisse1957
    @jefwisse1957 12 днів тому

    From above you can see how poorly the bridge is protected from collisions. I wonder what would happen if a ship would hit the high voltage power lines.

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 12 днів тому

      In hindsight it's poorly protected, but 47 years and thousands of ships passing safely brings complacency. Also, when the bridge was built, the channel was only 30 feet, so the ships were much smaller then. According to what I've read, while the electrical lines are protected, a 110,000 ton ship would severely damage them.

  • @milroybyrde1106
    @milroybyrde1106 12 днів тому

    Why did the ship come closer to the bridge and lose power to turn towards the beam post. Does it have to go sideways once the ship loses power and 🤔🤫🫣👈👉

    • @G6JPG
      @G6JPG 12 днів тому +1

      Once it loses power, it is driven by currents, wind, and anything else - both in direction and orientation. It didn't deliberately "turn" at all.

    • @stereolababy
      @stereolababy 11 днів тому +3

      because you like conspiracy

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 11 днів тому +2

      You're asking this now when it's been in the news since March 26?

  • @steveconnolly7129
    @steveconnolly7129 13 днів тому

    WOW!! Gettn it done and,safely get the rest done,get 3 tug boats to help get the boat out,is the lean getting worse!!!!!

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 13 днів тому +1

      I think the USACE knows what to do.

  • @smilsmff
    @smilsmff 13 днів тому

    Shows ship could have went through there completely sideways

    • @robertpalmer3166
      @robertpalmer3166 13 днів тому

      Wow. What a helpful and perfectly executed comment. Bravo to you good sir.

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 12 днів тому

      But it couldn't. The channel is 700 feet wide, the Dali is 984 feet long, so sideways wouldn't work.

    • @robertpalmer3166
      @robertpalmer3166 12 днів тому

      @@1972Ray But somebody on the internet said it would, so it will.

  • @comradeyuri8492
    @comradeyuri8492 13 днів тому +1

    Seems like this bridge was cheaply made from start to finish ? I'm surprised it lasted this long !

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 13 днів тому +2

      You'd be wrong on that.

    • @jefwisse1957
      @jefwisse1957 12 днів тому

      @@1972Ray Don't think so, I agree that the design is very poorly without any protection against collisions. Now they have to spent a lott more to reconstruct the bridge.

    • @G6JPG
      @G6JPG 12 днів тому

      Not so. You're not appreciating the scale of the thing. Look at some of the closeups, such as where it's resting on the bow of the ship, and the chunks of it being taken away.

    • @The-Real-Ando
      @The-Real-Ando 11 днів тому +2

      It wasn’t a cheap bridge, $60.3 million in 1977 equal to about $310 million today. The replacement cost is estimated at around $400 million but may well be a bigger better bridge. Bridges aren’t designed to be hit by ships.