Native American Stone Tools And Artifacts ~ BEST ARTIFACT CLEANER !
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- After trying many cleaners, Murphy's oil soap is the best I have found. It adds some degree of conditioning and is very mild. The only drawback is it takes about three weeks for the artifacts to fully dry.
Awesome Stuff right here. Enjoying the critiques.
Ignorance is Bliss.
Thanks for all you share.
Awesome artifacts. I learn so much from your channel.
I have a tremendous area in Midwest Illinois to hunt. Hoping to start being more intentional about this hobby. hobby
Illinois is a great place to hunt! Artifact rich.
Great as always! Keep up the good work! Ignore the dullards. 😘💞✌
Rocks , no artifacts
You are partially correct. They are made of rocks!
You are wrong.
Agree, no artifacts.
Fantastic artifacts. It is leafy out there! Thx for sharing
5:43 beautiful full Duckhead left side portrait. That is a generational effigy.
15:57 I really like the Axe at the end. Compelling collection.
Great collection of creek stones,ill give ya that.just ridiculous.
Yup. They get pissy when told they are wrong. Embarrassing.
I'm sorry but you don't have indian artifacts. You need to do better research.
The last piece you can see a dog or bear head on one side and a bird when turned over . I have found Stone Age portable art similar to this depicting animal and human faces
There are no artifacts in this representation of natural worn and weathered stones. Any wear and polishing you are see in these is from natural erosion by nature. Plus any kind of conditioning with anything other then water of an actual artifact is frowned upon highly. Conditioning river rocks like these does make them prettier so no harm there.
Thought the same. Not one clearly recognizable artifact, only river pebbles.
A couple have possibly seen some limited use, but they are certainly not "museum worthy."
There are no stone artifacts that can't also be explained by natural processes. Man is also a natural processor.
Sooooo???
...mehhh..
Usually, it comes down to the level of symmetry or refining that makes it unquestionably shaped by humans.
What defines an artifact?
I have a a rock I regularly use as a hammer stone. The rock can be left outside, cost nothing, and is easily replaceable. Would it be considered an artifact 100,000 years from now?
Nope, but it actually is.
So, I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean, no artifacts that you recognize? Or maybe you don't accept the more average, run of the mill grinding and polishing stones as artifacts? It is hard to tell on things like this. I would have to put them in my hand and inspect for different textures on one ore more facets, but I'm no expert.
I mean exactly what I said. There are no artifacts displayed here. Only natural time worn rock. I am well familiar with the average use tool as I specialize in them. Absolutely no human alteration, use wear or typology present in any of these. There are plenty of them that could have served the purpose as speculated as they are shaped favorably to make them into a tool. But none show any signs of this. @@pareidoliarocks
To say it in other words you would agree that to be considered an artifact of human use it has to display some amount of human modification from shaping to suit or used wear. And the evidence of both surviving to analyze. @@leveljoe
At 9:20 is a little stone i call a mushroom stone. I found one just like it and wondered what it was for. It seems to be a tool but i also think it resembles a mushroom 🍄
@@lesjones5684 we have a friend nicknamed Mushroom soup
@@lesjones5684 Kerr? Is that you?!?!
At the 2:34 mark of video that one 🤔 I think it is a weapon of protection type. like when someone goes into woods wearing a knife not to ues to protect. Or like a baseball bat/golf club behind the front door for that just in case. So it could have been a women's or a man's. Not much wearing in ues for it may never been used just sitting there just in case. Got a few myself. 🤓 Looks like a 3 or 4 wood club 😁
Thank you for the video 👍👍
Could be? It's a bit small ,but they definitely used similar stones for clubs.
@@brentkuehne435 not so much on size matters. If war weapon yes. These they could have been a children weapon of protection. Dad going hunting for food, mom kids protect them self from wildlife, animals coming into camp types of protection.😏😁 Rodents removal "weapon"/tool. Thank you for the videos 👍
Thank you
Thanks
Unfortunately none of these are artifacts, I’ve very sorry. They are just cool river rocks, not used by man. I’ve been hunting for years and have display cases full of tools and arrowheads. Next time check for knapping marks or just google what tools look like
I would love for you to do a video showing how the knapping technique was used in making hardstone tools?
Awesome artifacts
No one seems to know what they were used for.
I also love stones, and your enthusiasm is infatuation, but......
It is all natural stones.... there are no artifacts in any of those pieces of rock..... Great imagination though...
Sorry, but no human being ever touched those before you did...
You have part of it right!
You are wrong.
He has it all correct.
@@brentkuehne435
@brentkuehne435 Brent, I'm sorry, but those are not artifacts.