Thank you for this video! I recently found what I could only characterize as a Cache of very early stone tools in a small localized area next to a dried up creek run which leads into a river nearby. I found these tools close together within a few inches or a few feet of each other eroding out of an embankment that is below the floor of the current wooded area. I believe this relatively long flat area would’ve been a good place for someone to settle or build a camp. The tools I found look very much like tools I have seen In both Britain and France which are listed as middle and upper Paleolithic period. I was absolutely stunned to find them in South Carolina. I haven’t contacted the state archaeologist yet because I want to be sure but based upon things I have seen and flint knapping I have done myself, These are very old. The shape, size, and proximity to a flat area next to the confluence of a spring fed creek and river bed, and the patina all convince me I need to go back and take some measurements and see if I can get permission to dig a small test pit to see what else I can find because they were eroded out of the soil near where a retention pond has been put in by a land developer. I want to make sure I rescue any more evidence before it is gone. I’m glad people are starting to cover this material and talk about it more now. I think we have been misinformed about the history of our country and North America in general.
I feel like im in the same boat being close to the southern edge of the tennesee river. These tools are nearly exactly what ive found hundreds of within 500 ft probably.
@@thechronic555 American history is much older than we have been led to believe. In fact, I have spoken to a number of people who work in different scientific fields that have encountered some anomalies that completely contradict what we have thought was set in stone, previously, out of the water. the field of archaeology and anthropology in general is being constantly updated now, and it is scaring the hell out of some of them.
@@thechronic555 you are going to find a lot of stone tools in the Tennessee river area my friend. There are some of us who already know that area was heavily inhabited over a long period of time all the way back to the archaic time. We also know that there were Hopewell people that lived along the Tennessee river among other places, and of course, down into the Mississippian culture there were people living along the Tennessee river, and the various large creeps. Tennessee gorge is a very interesting place. You should check that one out. Also the Pindon mounds. I got my original training in Archaeology many years ago when I was living in England. I visited sites in England, Scotland, Cornwall, and France. The similarities were striking. I have also found stone tools in North Carolina, and South Carolina, and Georgia that are similar to the ones I found in Britain. That really blew my mind. Don’t stop looking.
I’m here from the same situation. Was fishing and found a bunch of rocks in a pile along a creek bank. even found a trout carved in stone. Have been down a lot of rabbit holes trying to understand what I have
I see artifacts like the ones shown in Alabama with an elderly landowner who spent countless hours rescuing them from the plows. Club heads, hand axes. The ages range from Mississippian to Woodland to what appears to be acheulean. All mixed on a wide flat creek bottom 10ft above a wide swamp. The acheulean spear points and hand axes aren't heat treated..which turns our white Ocala chert into the purple and pink artifacts some here call real flint. Some of the oldest has a crust on the facets of the tool. The hand axes found look like calico teardrop and mussel shell style. The stuff he didn't treasure was the oldest non- heat treated. Once he found out, he placed it inside among his other treasures of pink, purple and greenstone.
It’s already getting more interesting, let’s prove and challenging is just getting mainstream academics to accept what is being found. Instead, some of them are running away, others are putting their head in the sand, and still others are at least trying to engage this, but it’s difficult for themto get their head around the possibility that all they have been taught by generations of repetitive academic methodology may not actually be applicable anymore.
@@slapshot1x Copy of my perspective: 🔺This reflects Academic Ethics and Higher Minded confidence, speaking on video to a subject that can assist in a "Potential Paradigm Shift". 🔺Outstanding subject content, and Academics involved in the exploration of this subject. ☀️The "Mainstream Academic Paradigm" has to shift, as the DNA studies reveal data that does not support their "19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline" + countless finds and "Peer Reviewed and Journal Published Science Findings" also contradict the Paradigm. "Authentic Academics" adhere to the "Standards of Science and Research" which prohibits using a Theory as Fact. "Mainstream Academics" overwhelmingly are enforcing a "Belief based Theory Paradigm" used as fact, and they have rejected countless finds and lab based data that doesn't support their "Paradigm". I know there's fresh fact based energies flowing through the subject and the next 2 years will see an unfolding of facts that will be the Beginning of a "Conscious and Higher Minded Authentic Academic" experience. "Discernment rather than Judgemental." It is a beautiful Now reality. 🏹☀️ Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian ... an "Authentic Academic" .
Fantastic! As always, extraordinary explanation. The similarities are so close- its crazy, and should, by any logical person, be accepted as what you say they are.
if you are not looking for something, you will not find anything. If you assume that there are no humans here before a certain time, you will not look for humans before that time.
It's obvious that they are all scared because they'd expect being ridiculed or canceled. I am following the US prehistoric finds on youtube and soon I got the idea that the "First Nations" have strong interest on hiding the reality. It is one thing not to know and quite another to intentionally twist and hide from the point of the accepted dogma. I agree with you, but that road won't be easy.
Good luck with that. You’re going to have to get the entire field of archaeology and anthropology in North America, which has its roots in organizations, like the Smithsonian, to first admit that they don’t know everything. I think they are starting to come around a little bit now, but they are very slow to give up ground on this, new information and evidence that is being discovered.
@@billsadler3 lol… would that be under follicularly challenged persons of large stature ? it’s too bad. They totally remain silent about the mummified remains and extraordinary artifacts that defy any explanation being found in caves in the Midwest and southwestern states. I’m just biting my time before I bring forward the collection of artifacts I have. No point in bringing it forward now. It’s all about timing and getting the right person at the right time to see.
I found a cache of tools after the hurricane. About 100 pieces; mostly hammerheads- a hammer for everything- different sizes and shapes; but also reflectors, scrapers, bone knife; and arrowheads. Tools for fine work.
My daughter and i have seen the faces for a long time , people just call us crazy. They say our imagination is to big. But albert Einstein quoted "an imagination is more valuable than knowledge. " so we roll with it.
Whatever it is you have been drinking, injecting into your arm or snorting has only fueled your imagination to take the wrong fork in the road. What is claimed to be old world lower Paleolithic artifacts are not . The assumption the film maker makes about archaeologists only studying new world artifacts it totally false.
I live in lansing Mi, I have thousands of tools like this! I've been actively looking for this stuff in fields and river banks. Hand held axes,aterian like stemmed points.three sided arrowheads,hand held hammer stones.
Make sure you keep track of the locations you find your items (GPS phone app). It might be important in the future. You're very very lucky to live in such a historic area 👍
I have almost 200 tools they were in some kind of melted kind of Meteorito, Some tiñe of (SCORIA) a geologist told me that those bobles on the metal magnetic rock that was surrounding those tools could be because Meteorito that hits( IOWA) long time ago but I have found those tools right in the City of KC MO. I will like to send you pictures just do not know how to do it.
Thank you so much!!! Finally there are some scientists who are taking the claims of the Cerutti Mastodon scientists seriously. For me your work is so convincing!
Very good discussion, very informative. "Clovis first" is dead and has been for a while now. Should have been declared dead decades ago. I'm finishing up Christopher Hardaker's book, The First Americans (2007), dealing with the no longer "controversial" finds at Hueyatlaco, an archeological site in the Valsequillo Basin near the city of Puebla, Mexico. He makes it very clear: Clovis first is dead.
This is great! I’m glad that someone else has noticed this as well. I recently was taking my dog for a walk and being the little Indiana Jones hound that she is she found an artifact for me. Actually I think she smelled something next to it and I actually looked down to see what she was sniffing and saw the artifact protruding partially out of the clay. I had to wiggle it around a bit to get it out. It was about 5 inches long with one curved edge with some retouch along that age and it looked like both ends had fractured or broken off at one point. It was a good weight and profile and thickness and fit nicely in the hand. I wasn’t 100% sure but it reminded me an awful lot of artifacts that I found when I was living in Britain years ago. I went along as a volunteer on a few digs and did quite a bit of field walking. I was mentored by a Lithologist to help me learn how to identify the different time periods and styles. This looked like a very old style and did not fit the normal local Catawba Indian or south eastern American Indian artifact typologies. So I took it to a local archaeologist that worked for the University of South Carolina and he did confirm that it was human made (possibly) from a natural piece of broken quartzite. Beyond that he couldn’t tell me much because as I said it didn’t fit the normal types. It reminded me of something I found in England that was definitely Paleolithic but that is the word that you dare not speak over here and I definitely got shut down when I found those artifacts over there because it didn’t fit with the story that they had already written about the local history and prehistory of the area where I lived either. It would be great to know how many people are finding these anomalous artifacts and where they are being found. I have a theory that history and prehistory are not what we have been told. I also know how to do a bit of flint knapping myself because it helps me to understand the mindset of the tool maker. Good video.
Tell me about it! I think Neanderthals or Denisovans made it over here, possiby to Michigan. Of course you dare not say that where too many can hear because well, you know...there is a vested interest in the Clovis First narrative.There are those who don't want to give up the od paradgm.
@@harrietharlow9929 I agree! I think they made it a lot further than Michigan. We haven’t even touched upon Canada yet. The Canadian government is sitting down hard on any evidence of past and invitation because they still have a lot of indigenous people that live in Canada that will not let them disturb the Archaeology. I think there is something very sinister going on, and there has been for decades, but I’ll just leave it at that. As for the argument against all of this, I say they traveled across mountains and valleys and deserts and small salt water bodies and rivers? What if they traveled up and down rivers? What if they had the means and the ingenuity to make small boats and they could do this? Then once the continents began to separate seismically, which was possibly caused by a larger event that triggered the underground water to break loose and ice sheets to melt… Do you see where I’m going with this? What if prior to all of that happening, mankind was able to travel from place to place and trade goods, and mingle with each other? So, what if Neanderthal is actually a combination of human beings and a less evolved hominid? What if those Neanderthals then intermingled with a more advanced species of mankind, which then went on to become who we are now? These are all theories, of course. No one can prove them 100% to be true. science is not the answer to everything. It is just a tool. It comprises what we know so far and what we think we know. Sometimes you have to take a leap of faith and use your imagination to speculate” what if… “ But It doesn’t mean that the speculations are wrong. It doesn’t mean that a lot of things we take to be facts are complete. sorry this was a bit much to throw out all at one time. I’ve been waiting for years to say something, and I keep getting shut down by “classically “trained archaeologists. I think Archaeology and anthropology are in dire need of an overhaul and update.
@@csluau5913 I can't believe I'm reading this, haha. This is precisely the conclusion I arrived at earlier in the week! I've been pulling truckloads of tools from a creek in the last week since I started realizing what was there. Man I wish we could compare notes.
@@designisnigh , I just had a friend of mine who has access to LIDAR imaging all over the state send me some imaging of an area that I have been researching and what I have seen is amazing. There are layers of things in certain places around South Carolina. It shows that what we are being told about the history of North America, and the different states is incomplete to say the least. I have my own personal views about North America, but I won’t go into that here. I found a very old pebble tool at this location that is almost identical to a Paleolithic tool bound in Wyoming. I suppose here they call it Paleo Indian but I think that’s a stupid term.why does everybody think that only the Indians lived in North America? They are selling a narrative and I’m no longer buying it.
@@harrietharlow9929 I agree. Here’s something else to think about. This will really cook your noodle. What if… Neanderthals did not immigrate here. What if it was the other way around? What if they date back to a time period. Where the landmasses were much closer together, and somehow they made it from what is now, North America over into what is now, Europe? This is the rattlesnake that everyone runs away from. There are a lot of very strange things in the last 20 years that have come up that are scaring the hell out of a number of archaeologists, and anthropologist. They keep saying to themselves this can’t be right, this can’t be right. But what if it is?
I live along a creek in the panhandle of Montcalm Co just north of you and have found tools here. They are definitely worked by hand but don't match anything I see online. Mostly grinding stones and some type of hammer stones, some are real nice. Just found your channel and plan on watching all your videos. Keep up the good work.
I've been curious. The theory is the deeper you dig, the older the artifact. The glaciers dug hundreds of feet holes making the great lakes and depositing possible artifacts on the shores, that could be very old. It appears the native Americans knew rocks a lot more than us, could they have picked them up and moved some of them around to their home sites and or trade them, making it look like it was made more recently, yet very old?
I think our distant ancestors were a lot more clever than we give them credit for being. I see no reason why Erectus or Hiedelberg Man couldn't have made boats and crossed the ocean.
I think a great many assumptions have been made about classifying and quantifying levels of human adaptation. They’ve all been lumped into “evolution “ instead of adaptation. So many assumptions have been made about how we came to be what we are now, and really, there isn’t enough comprehensive evidence to show that the assumptions are based upon truth or fact. Human beings are incredibly smart, and they always have been able to adapt repeatedly to changing circumstances and conditions around them. In truth, we are still adapting or evolving if that’s how you would like to frame it. A study was done a few years ago, showing that a human being which practices the technology of stone toolmaking or lithic production is actually as smart as a modern human being that engages in playing chess regularly. Why? Because both activities involve using the brain to predict And execute a number of steps in order to achieve a result ahead of time in their brain before they actually physically do it. So, It is the same as tactical or strategic thinking, several steps in advance. Also, the hand to eye coordination fires the synapses of the brain more quickly. This boosts the intelligence by improving the mental speed and cognitive ability of the person doing it. Additionally, the consumption of red meat which contains a lot of amino acids and other building blocks which ultimately lead to a higher rate of Neurological cell production is key. This is why the Paleo peoples hunted and consumed a lot of meat. It literally fed their brains making them smarter so they were able to make Leaps in technological evolution periodically. It also made the men masculine and the women feminine, which created very clear, social, divides, and specific roles within that society. We called them primitive, but they were anything but primitive. In someways, they had to be smarter than we are now in order to create literally everything they needed from whatever was around them. I don’t think the timeframe we have been given is nearly as long. I think they made leaps over thousands of years not tens of thousands of years or millions of years. I don’t agree with the origins of humanity being millions of years old. I think that timeframe is far too long.
DNA has proven they were mobile in deep antiquity. Artifacts exist that have been ignored, but they can not ignored Lab based repeatable Science. David Reich, PhD, Geneticist Harvard, Mapping Worldwide Ancient Migrations using DNA. Data exists, and he unintentionally proved the "All out of Africa Theory" Inaccurate. circa 2019 if memory serves me accurately. It's a New Now in Academia. The next 2 years will be abundant in Peer Reviewed and Journal Published Science facts causing a return to the "Standards of Science and Research" which prohibits using a Theory as Fact. "Authentic Academics" adhere to the "Standards of Science and Research" and they support "Freedom of Thoughts", it's required to be Ethical. Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian .
@@csluau5913 Linear Evolution just isn't supported by the DNA data. That's why it isn't factoring in your minds Logic. There's obvious questions we've been trained to ignore. The greater facts and truths are emerging. It is a most positive and exciting time. See my previous reply on this thread. Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian .
It is interesting to note that indigenous peoples, homo sapiens, have stated, claimed, told, drawn, carved and danced that they: a) emerged from the earth here (Southwest), were formed here from the soil and rocks (Northwest) or found humans already here (Northwest). These are gross oversimplifications, but the fossil record keeps revealing older specimens in places previously ASSUMED to be impossible. Hominids migrated in Waves and Trickles... the latter most likely along coastal routes where artifacts are now underseas. But, hominid presence in N America has to be pre ice age at least. We shall see.....
Denisovans were in east Asia for hundreds of thousands of years. Could easily have walked to North America via the Bering Strait when the sea level was lower....
Hi girl! so do I and I've been dying to talk to somebody and show somebody my pictures nobody wants to see them. I think I found story rocks creation rocks and I just want somebody to look at apparently no museums and nobody online but I'd love to see yours if you want to show them to me !
The same face and buffalo that is on the Creator stone meteorite in Canada is on the stones. Creator stones, Manitou image stones, Native American spirit stones.
I live in Central maine and have found hundreds of tools exactly like in this video. And hundreds of animal carvings. No one gives me the time of day - don't even want to see them.
I am turning many friends and family members into believers. It needs to go mainstream to sink into the minds of the masses. Our world and it's straight lines and flat surfaces blind your minds eye.
I have found some stone hand tools that resemble the stone tools that were found in tbe bombay caves in africa.. the same type of techniques were used to create them and similar stone material..
We should keep in mind that a lot of stone tools we find are unfinished, discarded, broken while attempting to work them. We look at those things as a finished piece and try to determine a certain technology. But people were surely experimenting, making mistakes, failing altogether. Flintknapping is hard work. It was one strategy out of several to acquire food. Clovis, Folsom and Solutrean took it to extremes. Some researchers think their points were for showing off because they invested so much time. Actually over invested their time and energy...while thriving. In difficult times people would probably make simpler stuff. They needed to eat and be efficient at getting the meat.
the problem with looking for faces in ancient tools is that it is subjective and immediately ignored by mainstream archeologists. What we need to do is use actual scientific methodology to show what we are finding. My research indicates that there was a large group of people in the Americas and around the globe that used pecking and grinding as their primary method for making tools. Flaking was used but looks very rudimentary. I suggest documenting repeating features like similar sized concave grooves, polished areas, residual material and striations from use. If you are interested, I can show you many examples of what I am talking about. If you are interested in a more technological approach I would recommend, Ground stone tool analysis, a technological approach by Jenny Adams.
I find "worked" rocks all the time between S.E. Idaho and S.W. Utah that look like normal to totally different tools. People tell me I'm full of it but I know better and have saved some cool stuff.
I have a theory that maybe the stories from the Native Americans about giants, and the stories of the bones of giants being dug up are from the last of some Denisovans that came to the Americas. And maybe they used those tools.
Yes!!! I find these exact kinds of artifacts in MN. I love looking at them and turning them different ways and am absolutely blown away by their complexity. One thing that I notice in my finds is that all of them have a single 'magic eye' near the business end, created by two blows leaving behind a hollow eye-shape. The opposite end has a decorative oval hole worked in. It's as if these beings practiced a type of spirituality that could enter their tools through the oval hole and see out of the magic eye in order to help the tool work better.
Totally! The "magic eye" is always there. It is so strange. I have started noticing a bunch of these same tools and art over the past couple of years. The fractal patterns that are used for the images and tools also occur naturally but I believe the patterns are exploited and accentuated. Also it seems that there is a certain state of mind required, or induced maybe by the images, almost like 3D art and other optical illusions This is truly strange and undeniably intriguing.
I am not an archeologist or a knapper. However, is it not possible that knapping "schools" were interupted with the demise of a knowledgable individual, with knapping technology being reinvented, time and time again? Also, in what context were these artifacts found?
AT LAST!!! I have entertained these very thoughts for quite some time. I kept noticing patterns and started separating them accordingly. Some of the pieces are too redundant to dismiss. Why the Archeological society doesn't accept them is beyond me. Arrogance is keeping important doors closed. Sad...
Love this subject, i come at it from a different position and try to see through a lens of capital and money tokens, interested in the value of tools and different stone materials in general, and of course the history of tools making in conjuction with the development of money and trade in all types of resources. I just see it all connecting in a multitude of ways.
I've tossed some of these aside thinking they were just coincidence but definitely gonna keep the next ones. I live on an old native american campground
Nothing will change in academia regarding archaeology...Too many professors and chairs of Universities, afraid to discount their degrees, which are also their very living and mortgage payments...All the stuff they offer, is neatly packaged answers, at their core, based on speculation and a desire to show the mere mortals of this world, that they KNOW...Great video and info though and thanks...
Very interesting ,only problem is we have in Northeastern Ohio, the same designs in Stone -Ceramics - & Glass ? send contact info, I will send care package or pictures !
Those are all virtually identical to the tools I find in my neck of the woods.Western new York.Ive always believed that people were here during the Ice age,or at least hunter gatherers traveling the open corridor between the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets.as far as tools resembling animals, well kind obvious isn't it..... they had no other frame of reference to anything except natural forms.I see so many websites with so called effigies, and most of the shapes are the products of the geologic forces that formed the stone, most people don't even know the basic types of stone,if it's metamorphic, igneous, conglomerate etc. I have many artifacts that are obviously inspired by the only world they knew.Is it an artifact or geofact,,it has to pass a number of specific criteria that can't be explained by the effects of natural ground action.
At Calico Hill they had to have a test pit to prove that lithics were not just a natural process depositing what looked to be assemblages. Within the test pit, they found nothing which proves that what was found at the dig site is indeed lithic and not geofact. Interestingly, I read or heard somewhere that when Hueyetlaco was discovered it was quickly overshadowed by Leaky's discovery in Africa about a month later so for Leaky to be torn apart over Calico Hill, unusual scholarship and discovery indeed!
Interesting - I have a site in West Kent (UK) producing very similar looking artefacts in local quartzose (a quartz cemented sandstone). Based on pottery and imported flint tools the site covers the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Bronze Age periods. However I also believe we have much older artefacts, including zoomorphic portable rock art and stone tools that may well be much older? Here in the UK mainstream archaeology often overlook non-flint lithics in favour of more diagnostic flint tools. As such they are often dismissed as 'road stone ' or simply a by product of post-medieval quarrying of the parent rock - in our case Tunbridge Wells Sandstone. However on further examination tell tale evidence of being 'worked' can often be observed in the form of bipolar knapping techniques, flaking and edge re-touch. Combined with numerous examples of morphological parallels to more commonly recorded flint tools it would seem that quartzose (and other local stone alternatives) tend to get overlooked in archaeological research.
Man you're so lucky. Earlier I was just dreaming how cool it would be to live in Europe and Asia and have a slight chance at finding Neanderthal fossils and artifacts. How amazing if you just happened to uncover something that could contribute to our understanding of early humans.
Ive a theory on this. 1 is that we have had natives here forever. I have found stuff with signs of intelligent chipping but on the wrong type of rock. Many grinding instead of flaking. My other thoughts are the natives trading with french and others that have traveled here. They brought stone and old points found that they thought useless but thought would trade well. I found a couple danish flint scrapers in WV
Thank you. I am new to learning about these things. I have gone through some of my rocks i collected without knowing why i liked them. Many are covered with pictures i didnt see before. I realized that 1 stone i have sanded a lot as i was trying to figure out the type of stone was something really special as it is different from the rest and so hard it would have been a masterpiece. I have ruined it but can still make out mammoths etc. I cant stop feeling like throwing up and crying.
@DJWESG1 Michigan was under ice until 16000 years ago. Even if they were here before the ice everything would have been destroyed by glaciation. They are going to have to go digging around in Mexico if they want to prove otherwise.
We arent supposed to know about this and some of our keepers are trying to keep it secret. I have thousands of pieces. We all need to join together to get our artifacts recognized and straighten out the timeline. Admittance of this time period will rewrite history and change what we have been taught. Puts a unique twist on what the bible says as well. Suddenly the religious lies will be clear. We deserve to know the truth
I’m an artifact hunter and always find things that are definitely worked but look like nothing I have ever seen!! There were definitely humanoids here with the dinosaurs!!
You lost me when you talked about seeing faces. Wasn't the northern part of North America covered in ice for 100.000 years? Also, genetic evidence disproves humans being here more than 100,000 years ago.
1. You’re really reaching. 2. Faces? You’re really really reaching. What other explanations did you consider? You have way to much invested in this theory to see reality.
Unfortunately, context is only valid when it serves the purpose of those who control the sole narrative endorsed (mandated) by the current archeo community.Pebbles and cobbles. Cobbles and pebbles. There is nothing there.
I believe I have found evidence of different types of people from the early stone ages here in North America . I appreciate you for agreeing with me that there may have been people from that time here then . It's a big thrill to hold something that a different species made . It brings me closer to the past and they are trying to tell everyone their story the best way they knew how with rock art !
How can I contact you... ?????You need to see what I found in KCMO have a few tools just like that... You don't believe me just give it a try.... If you interest on helping me analyze them stone age tools , I might have some tooths, have few figures, ...you the one with knowledge.. Please let's talk... You will change history..... Thank you... For sharing...
Thank you for this video! I recently found what I could only characterize as a Cache of very early stone tools in a small localized area next to a dried up creek run which leads into a river nearby. I found these tools close together within a few inches or a few feet of each other eroding out of an embankment that is below the floor of the current wooded area.
I believe this relatively long flat area would’ve been a good place for someone to settle or build a camp. The tools I found look very much like tools I have seen In both Britain and France which are listed as middle and upper Paleolithic period. I was absolutely stunned to find them in South Carolina. I haven’t contacted the state archaeologist yet because I want to be sure but based upon things I have seen and flint knapping I have done myself, These are very old.
The shape, size, and proximity to a flat area next to the confluence of a spring fed creek and river bed, and the patina all convince me I need to go back and take some measurements and see if I can get permission to dig a small test pit to see what else I can find because they were eroded out of the soil near where a retention pond has been put in by a land developer. I want to make sure I rescue any more evidence before it is gone. I’m glad people are starting to cover this material and talk about it more now. I think we have been misinformed about the history of our country and North America in general.
I feel like im in the same boat being close to the southern edge of the tennesee river. These tools are nearly exactly what ive found hundreds of within 500 ft probably.
@@thechronic555 American history is much older than we have been led to believe. In fact, I have spoken to a number of people who work in different scientific fields that have encountered some anomalies that completely contradict what we have thought was set in stone, previously, out of the water. the field of archaeology and anthropology in general is being constantly updated now, and it is scaring the hell out of some of them.
@@thechronic555 you are going to find a lot of stone tools in the Tennessee river area my friend. There are some of us who already know that area was heavily inhabited over a long period of time all the way back to the archaic time. We also know that there were Hopewell people that lived along the Tennessee river among other places, and of course, down into the Mississippian culture there were people living along the Tennessee river, and the various large creeps. Tennessee gorge is a very interesting place. You should check that one out. Also the Pindon mounds. I got my original training in Archaeology many years ago when I was living in England. I visited sites in England, Scotland, Cornwall, and France. The similarities were striking. I have also found stone tools in North Carolina, and South Carolina, and Georgia that are similar to the ones I found in Britain. That really blew my mind. Don’t stop looking.
I’m here from the same situation. Was fishing and found a bunch of rocks in a pile along a creek bank. even found a trout carved in stone. Have been down a lot of rabbit holes trying to understand what I have
I see artifacts like the ones shown in Alabama with an elderly landowner who spent countless hours rescuing them from the plows. Club heads, hand axes. The ages range from Mississippian to Woodland to what appears to be acheulean. All mixed on a wide flat creek bottom 10ft above a wide swamp. The acheulean spear points and hand axes aren't heat treated..which turns our white Ocala chert into the purple and pink artifacts some here call real flint. Some of the oldest has a crust on the facets of the tool. The hand axes found look like calico teardrop and mussel shell style. The stuff he didn't treasure was the oldest non- heat treated. Once he found out, he placed it inside among his other treasures of pink, purple and greenstone.
I think that the history of the Americas is going to get a bit more interesting over the next few decades.
It’s already getting more interesting, let’s prove and challenging is just getting mainstream academics to accept what is being found. Instead, some of them are running away, others are putting their head in the sand, and still others are at least trying to engage this, but it’s difficult for themto get their head around the possibility that all they have been taught by generations of repetitive academic methodology may not actually be applicable anymore.
Thank you for your objectivity and insight. I think you could be right about this. Im going to re-examine my collection now!
Glad it was helpful!
@@slapshot1x
Copy of my perspective:
🔺This reflects Academic Ethics and Higher Minded confidence, speaking on video to a subject that can assist in a "Potential Paradigm Shift". 🔺Outstanding subject content, and Academics involved in the exploration of this subject.
☀️The "Mainstream Academic Paradigm" has to shift, as the DNA studies reveal data that does not support their "19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline" + countless finds and "Peer Reviewed and Journal Published Science Findings" also contradict the Paradigm.
"Authentic Academics" adhere to the "Standards of Science and Research" which prohibits using a Theory as Fact.
"Mainstream Academics" overwhelmingly are enforcing a "Belief based Theory Paradigm" used as fact, and they have rejected countless finds and lab based data that doesn't support their "Paradigm".
I know there's fresh fact based energies flowing through the subject and the next 2 years will see an unfolding of facts that will be the Beginning of a "Conscious and Higher Minded Authentic Academic" experience.
"Discernment rather than Judgemental."
It is a beautiful Now reality. 🏹☀️
Beth Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
... an "Authentic Academic"
.
Good video bud! Still chomping at the bit for the documentary coming soon! Keep up the great work
Awesome! Thank you!
I fully agree with you we have to be open minded for north america
Fantastic! As always, extraordinary explanation. The similarities are so close- its crazy, and should, by any logical person, be accepted as what you say they are.
Many thanks!
if you are not looking for something, you will not find anything. If you assume that there are no humans here before a certain time, you will not look for humans before that time.
From the comments, it seems like many thousands of probable artifacts have been collected already. Can somebody organize a study of all this material?
It's obvious that they are all scared because they'd expect being ridiculed or canceled. I am following the US prehistoric finds on youtube and soon I got the idea that the "First Nations" have strong interest on hiding the reality. It is one thing not to know and quite another to intentionally twist and hide from the point of the accepted dogma. I agree with you, but that road won't be easy.
Good luck with that. You’re going to have to get the entire field of archaeology and anthropology in North America, which has its roots in organizations, like the Smithsonian, to first admit that they don’t know everything. I think they are starting to come around a little bit now, but they are very slow to give up ground on this, new information and evidence that is being discovered.
Yup.....organize a 'study' and that'll be the end of it.....bound up in nonsense and red tape forever!!
@@csluau5913 The Smith does have a Sasquatch department. There is hope yeti!
@@billsadler3 lol… would that be under follicularly challenged persons of large stature ? it’s too bad. They totally remain silent about the mummified remains and extraordinary artifacts that defy any explanation being found in caves in the Midwest and southwestern states. I’m just biting my time before I bring forward the collection of artifacts I have. No point in bringing it forward now. It’s all about timing and getting the right person at the right time to see.
I found a cache of tools after the hurricane. About 100 pieces; mostly hammerheads- a hammer for everything- different sizes and shapes; but also reflectors, scrapers, bone knife; and arrowheads. Tools for fine work.
Very nice
My daughter and i have seen the faces for a long time , people just call us crazy. They say our imagination is to big. But albert Einstein quoted "an imagination is more valuable than knowledge. " so we roll with it.
Do you find animal faces? There is a formula of which animal lie on different axis of the rock.
4:34 :-)
Whatever it is you have been drinking, injecting into your arm or snorting has only fueled your imagination to take the wrong fork in the road. What is claimed to be old world lower Paleolithic artifacts are not . The assumption the film maker makes about archaeologists only studying new world artifacts it totally false.
I live in lansing Mi, I have thousands of tools like this! I've been actively looking for this stuff in fields and river banks. Hand held axes,aterian like stemmed points.three sided arrowheads,hand held hammer stones.
Amazing. It’s everywhere!!! Send some pics.
Make sure you keep track of the locations you find your items (GPS phone app). It might be important in the future.
You're very very lucky to live in such a historic area 👍
I have almost 200 tools they were in some kind of melted kind of Meteorito, Some tiñe of (SCORIA) a geologist told me that those bobles on the metal magnetic rock that was surrounding those tools could be because Meteorito that hits( IOWA) long time ago but I have found those tools right in the City of KC MO. I will like to send you pictures just do not know how to do it.
Thank you so much!!! Finally there are some scientists who are taking the claims of the Cerutti Mastodon scientists seriously. For me your work is so convincing!
I live in Indiana and can walk out and find these exact tools and different ones not shown here...thanks for sharing
Very good discussion, very informative. "Clovis first" is dead and has been for a while now. Should have been declared dead decades ago. I'm finishing up Christopher Hardaker's book, The First Americans (2007), dealing with the no longer "controversial" finds at Hueyatlaco, an archeological site in the Valsequillo Basin near the city of Puebla, Mexico. He makes it very clear: Clovis first is dead.
This is great! I’m glad that someone else has noticed this as well. I recently was taking my dog for a walk and being the little Indiana Jones hound that she is she found an artifact for me. Actually I think she smelled something next to it and I actually looked down to see what she was sniffing and saw the artifact protruding partially out of the clay. I had to wiggle it around a bit to get it out.
It was about 5 inches long with one curved edge with some retouch along that age and it looked like both ends had fractured or broken off at one point. It was a good weight and profile and thickness and fit nicely in the hand. I wasn’t 100% sure but it reminded me an awful lot of artifacts that I found when I was living in Britain years ago. I went along as a volunteer on a few digs and did quite a bit of field walking.
I was mentored by a Lithologist to help me learn how to identify the different time periods and styles. This looked like a very old style and did not fit the normal local Catawba Indian or south eastern American Indian artifact typologies. So I took it to a local archaeologist that worked for the University of South Carolina and he did confirm that it was human made (possibly) from a natural piece of broken quartzite. Beyond that he couldn’t tell me much because as I said it didn’t fit the normal types.
It reminded me of something I found in England that was definitely Paleolithic but that is the word that you dare not speak over here and I definitely got shut down when I found those artifacts over there because it didn’t fit with the story that they had already written about the local history and prehistory of the area where I lived either. It would be great to know how many people are finding these anomalous artifacts and where they are being found.
I have a theory that history and prehistory are not what we have been told. I also know how to do a bit of flint knapping myself because it helps me to understand the mindset of the tool maker. Good video.
Tell me about it! I think Neanderthals or Denisovans made it over here, possiby to Michigan. Of course you dare not say that where too many can hear because well, you know...there is a vested interest in the Clovis First narrative.There are those who don't want to give up the od paradgm.
@@harrietharlow9929 I agree! I think they made it a lot further than Michigan. We haven’t even touched upon Canada yet. The Canadian government is sitting down hard on any evidence of past and invitation because they still have a lot of indigenous people that live in Canada that will not let them disturb the Archaeology. I think there is something very sinister going on, and there has been for decades, but I’ll just leave it at that.
As for the argument against all of this, I say they traveled across mountains and valleys and deserts and small salt water bodies and rivers? What if they traveled up and down rivers? What if they had the means and the ingenuity to make small boats and they could do this?
Then once the continents began to separate seismically, which was possibly caused by a larger event that triggered the underground water to break loose and ice sheets to melt… Do you see where I’m going with this?
What if prior to all of that happening, mankind was able to travel from place to place and trade goods, and mingle with each other?
So, what if Neanderthal is actually a combination of human beings and a less evolved hominid? What if those Neanderthals then intermingled with a more advanced species of mankind, which then went on to become who we are now?
These are all theories, of course. No one can prove them 100% to be true. science is not the answer to everything. It is just a tool. It comprises what we know so far and what we think we know.
Sometimes you have to take a leap of faith and use your imagination to speculate” what if… “ But It doesn’t mean that the speculations are wrong. It doesn’t mean that a lot of things we take to be facts are complete. sorry this was a bit much to throw out all at one time. I’ve been waiting for years to say something, and I keep getting shut down by “classically “trained archaeologists. I think Archaeology and anthropology are in dire need of an overhaul and update.
@@csluau5913 I can't believe I'm reading this, haha. This is precisely the conclusion I arrived at earlier in the week! I've been pulling truckloads of tools from a creek in the last week since I started realizing what was there. Man I wish we could compare notes.
@@designisnigh , I just had a friend of mine who has access to LIDAR imaging all over the state send me some imaging of an area that I have been researching and what I have seen is amazing. There are layers of things in certain places around South Carolina. It shows that what we are being told about the history of North America, and the different states is incomplete to say the least. I have my own personal views about North America, but I won’t go into that here. I found a very old pebble tool at this location that is almost identical to a Paleolithic tool bound in Wyoming. I suppose here they call it Paleo Indian but I think that’s a stupid term.why does everybody think that only the Indians lived in North America? They are selling a narrative and I’m no longer buying it.
@@harrietharlow9929 I agree. Here’s something else to think about. This will really cook your noodle. What if… Neanderthals did not immigrate here. What if it was the other way around? What if they date back to a time period. Where the landmasses were much closer together, and somehow they made it from what is now, North America over into what is now, Europe? This is the rattlesnake that everyone runs away from. There are a lot of very strange things in the last 20 years that have come up that are scaring the hell out of a number of archaeologists, and anthropologist. They keep saying to themselves this can’t be right, this can’t be right. But what if it is?
We live in Northern Maryland, we have found ancient hand axe's and a lot other tools, scraper's.
Found the same tools in Philadelphia.
Me, too, Northern Baltimore Co.
Very interesting opens up a whole new way of thinking about artifacts
I live along a creek in the panhandle of Montcalm Co just north of you and have found tools here. They are definitely worked by hand but don't match anything I see online. Mostly grinding stones and some type of hammer stones, some are real nice. Just found your channel and plan on watching all your videos. Keep up the good work.
Please post videos we wanna see them
Thank you William. I’d love to see your finds.
I've been curious. The theory is the deeper you dig, the older the artifact. The glaciers dug hundreds of feet holes making the great lakes and depositing possible artifacts on the shores, that could be very old. It appears the native Americans knew rocks a lot more than us, could they have picked them up and moved some of them around to their home sites and or trade them, making it look like it was made more recently, yet very old?
I think our distant ancestors were a lot more clever than we give them credit for being. I see no reason why Erectus or Hiedelberg Man couldn't have made boats and crossed the ocean.
I think a great many assumptions have been made about classifying and quantifying levels of human adaptation. They’ve all been lumped into “evolution “ instead of adaptation. So many assumptions have been made about how we came to be what we are now, and really, there isn’t enough comprehensive evidence to show that the assumptions are based upon truth or fact. Human beings are incredibly smart, and they always have been able to adapt repeatedly to changing circumstances and conditions around them. In truth, we are still adapting or evolving if that’s how you would like to frame it.
A study was done a few years ago, showing that a human being which practices the technology of stone toolmaking or lithic production is actually as smart as a modern human being that engages in playing chess regularly. Why? Because both activities involve using the brain to predict And execute a number of steps in order to achieve a result ahead of time in their brain before they actually physically do it.
So, It is the same as tactical or strategic thinking, several steps in advance. Also, the hand to eye coordination fires the synapses of the brain more quickly. This boosts the intelligence by improving the mental speed and cognitive ability of the person doing it. Additionally, the consumption of red meat which contains a lot of amino acids and other building blocks which ultimately lead to a higher rate of Neurological cell production is key.
This is why the Paleo peoples hunted and consumed a lot of meat. It literally fed their brains making them smarter so they were able to make Leaps in technological evolution periodically. It also made the men masculine and the women feminine, which created very clear, social, divides, and specific roles within that society. We called them primitive, but they were anything but primitive. In someways, they had to be smarter than we are now in order to create literally everything they needed from whatever was around them. I don’t think the timeframe we have been given is nearly as long. I think they made leaps over thousands of years not tens of thousands of years or millions of years. I don’t agree with the origins of humanity being millions of years old. I think that timeframe is far too long.
DNA has proven they were mobile in deep antiquity. Artifacts exist that have been ignored, but they can not ignored Lab based repeatable Science.
David Reich, PhD, Geneticist Harvard, Mapping Worldwide Ancient Migrations using DNA. Data exists, and he unintentionally proved the "All out of Africa Theory" Inaccurate. circa 2019 if memory serves me accurately.
It's a New Now in Academia. The next 2 years will be abundant in Peer Reviewed and Journal Published Science facts causing a return to the "Standards of Science and Research" which prohibits using a Theory as Fact.
"Authentic Academics" adhere to the "Standards of Science and Research" and they support "Freedom of Thoughts", it's required to be Ethical.
Beth Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
.
@@csluau5913
Linear Evolution just isn't supported by the DNA data.
That's why it isn't factoring in your minds Logic. There's obvious questions we've been trained to ignore.
The greater facts and truths are emerging. It is a most positive and exciting time.
See my previous reply on this thread.
Beth Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
.
They were primitive.
good stuff glad to see others are learning they exist
It is interesting to note that indigenous peoples, homo sapiens, have stated, claimed, told, drawn, carved and danced that they: a) emerged from the earth here (Southwest), were formed here from the soil and rocks (Northwest) or found humans already here (Northwest). These are gross oversimplifications, but the fossil record keeps revealing older specimens in places previously ASSUMED to be impossible. Hominids migrated in Waves and Trickles... the latter most likely along coastal routes where artifacts are now underseas. But, hominid presence in N America has to be pre ice age at least. We shall see.....
Denisovans were in east Asia for hundreds of thousands of years. Could easily have walked to North America via the Bering Strait when the sea level was lower....
Great talk. Asia and America were one land.
Yep mastadon sites and wooly mammoth sites in america with evidence of ancient man
I have sooo many effigy stones.. painted stones, carved rocks.. finding anyone who is actually interested has been challenging to say the least.
Hi girl! so do I and I've been dying to talk to somebody and show somebody my pictures nobody wants to see them. I think I found story rocks creation rocks and I just want somebody to look at apparently no museums and nobody online but I'd love to see yours if you want to show them to me !
5:00 IMO When looking at artifact designs it's important to do so in natural lighting. That's what the vast majority were created under
Awesome! Thank you for sharing this.
Wow. Thanks guys for making this video. Now everything makes so much sense.
is there anyway I could send some pics of some artifacts I've found on my property here in southern middle tennessee?😊
The same face and buffalo that is on the Creator stone meteorite in Canada is on the stones. Creator stones, Manitou image stones, Native American spirit stones.
I live in Central maine and have found hundreds of tools exactly like in this video. And hundreds of animal carvings. No one gives me the time of day - don't even want to see them.
I am turning many friends and family members into believers. It needs to go mainstream to sink into the minds of the masses. Our world and it's straight lines and flat surfaces blind your minds eye.
I have found some stone hand tools that resemble the stone tools that were found in tbe bombay caves in africa.. the same type of techniques were used to create them and similar stone material..
I'd love your opinion on something that was DUG up on accident while burying a pet. I have pics
They want everything to fit into their preconceived notions. Life isn't like that.
We should keep in mind that a lot of stone tools we find are unfinished, discarded, broken while attempting to work them. We look at those things as a finished piece and try to determine a certain technology. But people were surely experimenting, making mistakes, failing altogether. Flintknapping is hard work. It was one strategy out of several to acquire food. Clovis, Folsom and Solutrean took it to extremes. Some researchers think their points were for showing off because they invested so much time. Actually over invested their time and energy...while thriving. In difficult times people would probably make simpler stuff. They needed to eat and be efficient at getting the meat.
the problem with looking for faces in ancient tools is that it is subjective and immediately ignored by mainstream archeologists. What we need to do is use actual scientific methodology to show what we are finding. My research indicates that there was a large group of people in the Americas and around the globe that used pecking and grinding as their primary method for making tools. Flaking was used but looks very rudimentary. I suggest documenting repeating features like similar sized concave grooves, polished areas, residual material and striations from use. If you are interested, I can show you many examples of what I am talking about. If you are interested in a more technological approach I would recommend, Ground stone tool analysis, a technological approach by Jenny Adams.
I find "worked" rocks all the time between S.E. Idaho and S.W. Utah that look like normal to totally different tools. People tell me I'm full of it but I know better and have saved some cool stuff.
I have a theory that maybe the stories from the Native Americans about giants, and the stories of the bones of giants being dug up are from the last of some Denisovans that came to the Americas. And maybe they used those tools.
Some tools patinas from different retouches look thousand years apart 😊
Couldn't you look at what layer these are being found in to date them?
Dr. Leakey, the one who discovered Zinjanthropus?????
Lucy-Australopithecus afarensis
Homo Erectus made the clouds too since they all have faces in them.
Put this on a t-shirt. 👏
Hey I have a large collection found in north Georgia. How do I get C.O.A.'s on them.
Yes!!! I find these exact kinds of artifacts in MN. I love looking at them and turning them different ways and am absolutely blown away by their complexity. One thing that I notice in my finds is that all of them have a single 'magic eye' near the business end, created by two blows leaving behind a hollow eye-shape. The opposite end has a decorative oval hole worked in. It's as if these beings practiced a type of spirituality that could enter their tools through the oval hole and see out of the magic eye in order to help the tool work better.
I find this fascinating and it prompts me to take another look at my finds to see if mine have such on them also.
Totally! The "magic eye" is always there. It is so strange. I have started noticing a bunch of these same tools and art over the past couple of years. The fractal patterns that are used for the images and tools also occur naturally but I believe the patterns are exploited and accentuated. Also it seems that there is a certain state of mind required, or induced maybe by the images, almost like 3D art and other optical illusions This is truly strange and undeniably intriguing.
Search Homo erectus in the Americas and your video comes up first without any other good videos on the topic showing up in the suggested feed.
I just found this:
ua-cam.com/video/tBpcvKuYnWI/v-deo.html
Yes!!!! Question, what kind of microscope are you using to show such beautiful detail?
I am not an archeologist or a knapper. However, is it not possible that knapping "schools" were interupted with the demise of a knowledgable individual, with knapping technology being reinvented, time and time again? Also, in what context were these artifacts found?
Wow. This is mind boggling. So what do i do if i somehow came across these exact tools and artifacts?
I live on a site , very large and not known . Im in Virginia.
I have thousands. I've lookws for archeology reports for years to back this up. This is the first.
we are finding them here in the Niagara region, too but seemingly nobody wants to listen! have done a couple videos so far but a LOT more to share...
AT LAST!!!
I have entertained these very thoughts for quite some time.
I kept noticing patterns and started separating them accordingly.
Some of the pieces are too redundant to dismiss.
Why the Archeological society doesn't accept them is beyond me.
Arrogance is keeping important doors closed.
Sad...
Love this subject, i come at it from a different position and try to see through a lens of capital and money tokens, interested in the value of tools and different stone materials in general, and of course the history of tools making in conjuction with the development of money and trade in all types of resources. I just see it all connecting in a multitude of ways.
Chris, I have a horse head/bird combo effigy, although I'm betting it was meant to be a bird . I'd love to share photo
I've tossed some of these aside thinking they were just coincidence but definitely gonna keep the next ones. I live on an old native american campground
The oldest tools yet discovered are the Lomekwian tool (3.3 million years old), not the Oldowan tool.
I have a piece I would love to share with you . Tiny tool . But i would love to have you’re input on it
I have many very similar tools that I have found here in Missouri.
Thunder stones ⚡
👍Thank you for the video👍
My psychology professor in college did some work at the Calico site.
What was psych doing at a dig site?
Dude! I'm in north texas & have uncovered a HUGE amount of lithics that look exactly like what you have. I'm trying to get someone to look @ them.
Constant tapping noise in the music is really distracting from your narrative ☹️
Nothing will change in academia regarding archaeology...Too many professors and chairs of Universities, afraid to discount their degrees, which are also their very living and mortgage payments...All the stuff they offer, is neatly packaged answers, at their core, based on speculation and a desire to show the mere mortals of this world, that they KNOW...Great video and info though and thanks...
I'm finding all these in Nashville 100 mi radius around Nashville was a heavy populated
Is this from a TV show? What is the guys name?
I am wondering the same thing. His name is Chris penny
Very interesting ,only problem is we have in Northeastern Ohio, the same designs in Stone -Ceramics - & Glass ? send contact info, I will send care package or pictures !
Those are all virtually identical to the tools I find in my neck of the woods.Western new York.Ive always believed that people were here during the Ice age,or at least hunter gatherers traveling the open corridor between the Laurentide and
Cordilleran ice sheets.as far as tools resembling animals, well kind
obvious isn't it..... they had no other
frame of reference to anything except natural forms.I see so many websites with so called effigies, and most of the shapes are the products of the geologic forces that formed the stone, most people don't even know the basic types of stone,if it's metamorphic, igneous, conglomerate etc. I have many artifacts that are obviously inspired by the only world they knew.Is it an artifact or geofact,,it has to pass a number of specific criteria that can't be explained by the effects of natural ground action.
At Calico Hill they had to have a test pit to prove that lithics were not just a natural process depositing what looked to be assemblages. Within the test pit, they found nothing which proves that what was found at the dig site is indeed lithic and not geofact. Interestingly, I read or heard somewhere that when Hueyetlaco was discovered it was quickly overshadowed by Leaky's discovery in Africa about a month later so for Leaky to be torn apart over Calico Hill, unusual scholarship and discovery indeed!
Interesting - I have a site in West Kent (UK) producing very similar looking artefacts in local quartzose (a quartz cemented sandstone). Based on pottery and imported flint tools the site covers the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Bronze Age periods. However I also believe we have much older artefacts, including zoomorphic portable rock art and stone tools that may well be much older? Here in the UK mainstream archaeology often overlook non-flint lithics in favour of more diagnostic flint tools. As such they are often dismissed as 'road stone ' or simply a by product of post-medieval quarrying of the parent rock - in our case Tunbridge Wells Sandstone. However on further examination tell tale evidence of being 'worked' can often be observed in the form of bipolar knapping techniques, flaking and edge re-touch. Combined with numerous examples of morphological parallels to more commonly recorded flint tools it would seem that quartzose (and other local stone alternatives) tend to get overlooked in archaeological research.
Man you're so lucky. Earlier I was just dreaming how cool it would be to live in Europe and Asia and have a slight chance at finding Neanderthal fossils and artifacts.
How amazing if you just happened to uncover something that could contribute to our understanding of early humans.
I have found those here in america
More than likely it's the kids learning how to nap
Ive a theory on this. 1 is that we have had natives here forever. I have found stuff with signs of intelligent chipping but on the wrong type of rock. Many grinding instead of flaking. My other thoughts are the natives trading with french and others that have traveled here. They brought stone and old points found that they thought useless but thought would trade well. I found a couple danish flint scrapers in WV
Interesting still not convinced specifically the face and animal
I have some that even the hardest of skeptics had to agree with me.
Thank you. I am new to learning about these things. I have gone through some of my rocks i collected without knowing why i liked them. Many are covered with pictures i didnt see before. I realized that 1 stone i have sanded a lot as i was trying to figure out the type of stone was something really special as it is different from the rest and so hard it would have been a masterpiece. I have ruined it but can still make out mammoths etc. I cant stop feeling like throwing up and crying.
How could there be tools like that in Michigan? It was under ice then.
Ever notice how early arrow heads look like sharks teeth?
I suspect that's on purpose.
@@DJWESG1 They do? I think it's the other way around. The early arrowheads were side notched. You don't see triangular ones until about 700 BP.
@DJWESG1 Michigan was under ice until 16000 years ago. Even if they were here before the ice everything would have been destroyed by glaciation. They are going to have to go digging around in Mexico if they want to prove otherwise.
I have something very significant to share with you. I’m going to try and find your email and send you some information and some photos.
Thank you for making this. How can I get similar stones from western NY identified?
We arent supposed to know about this and some of our keepers are trying to keep it secret. I have thousands of pieces. We all need to join together to get our artifacts recognized and straighten out the timeline. Admittance of this time period will rewrite history and change what we have been taught. Puts a unique twist on what the bible says as well. Suddenly the religious lies will be clear. We deserve to know the truth
i find the same stuff here in Va... i have a mastadon tooth i found on the site i hunt ..i have thousands of tools from there as well
When I got in to artifacts and got do research I said the same thing tools from Europe and American had same types of tools
None of these Michigan "tools" shown look like the much more sophisticated tools in europe, africa and asia from the periods claimed
Didn't all mammalians begin in the Americas, maybe a hint there.
Custom tools + kids gotta practice explains the odd variance.
Well. Your way outside the box with this one!
I’m an artifact hunter and always find things that are definitely worked but look like nothing I have ever seen!! There were definitely humanoids here with the dinosaurs!!
I find these objects very interesting. Neanderthals certainly could have reached North America, so who knows?
Well they were featured in the X-Files movie
I believe neaderthals were here
So do I. I find no arrow heads but I do find carved effigy stones everywhere. Mostly quartz, a very hard rock.
Consider: Prepared Core Flaking.
Perhaps young boys in the process of learning how to knap out raw rock.
You lost me when you talked about seeing faces. Wasn't the northern part of North America covered in ice for 100.000 years? Also, genetic evidence disproves humans being here more than 100,000 years ago.
So pretty much any piece a feller finds with a chip in it we can say it’s billions years old and it’s a tool. Sweet. Maybe trillions
I enjoyed this
Bruh
It's art.
Yeah. No one wants to especially say European. It doesn’t matter how ancient.
1. You’re really reaching.
2. Faces? You’re really really reaching.
What other explanations did you consider? You have way to much invested in this theory to see reality.
Denisovan artifacts.
Unfortunately, context is only valid when it serves the purpose of those who control the sole narrative endorsed (mandated) by the current archeo community.Pebbles and cobbles. Cobbles and pebbles. There is nothing there.
I believe I have found evidence of different types of people from the early stone ages here in North America . I appreciate you for agreeing with me that there may have been people from that time here then . It's a big thrill to hold something that a different species made . It brings me closer to the past and they are trying to tell everyone their story the best way they knew how with rock art !
You are correct. There were also giants. No joke. I have spears that would have to mounted on a four inch diameter log. No one today could weild them
How can I contact you... ?????You need to see what I found in KCMO have a few tools just like that... You don't believe me just give it a try.... If you interest on helping me analyze them stone age tools , I might have some tooths, have few figures, ...you the one with knowledge.. Please let's talk... You will change history..... Thank you... For sharing...