Closereads: Paul Grice's "Logic and Conversation" (Part One)

Mark and Wes go line by line through the 1975 ordinary language philosophy paper. What are the assumptions behind everyday conversation? When someone violates a conversational norm by, e.g., giving too much information or stating something literally untrue, what are the strategies by which we try to make sense of what they're saying as still a sensible contribution to the conversation? Read along with us: partiallyexami....
This also serves as part three to The Partially Examined Life's episode 325. Here's part one: • Partially Examined Lif... . However, this is a standalone analysis and should be understandable without listening to any of that.
Thanks for watching Closereads: Philosophy with Mark and Wes, a new podcast by the creators of The Partially Examined Life. Do you want to hear (and watch) all previous and future installments, including (soon) a second and third part to this reading? Sign up at patreon.com/closereadsphilosophy.
Note that any ads you see here are added by UA-cam in exchange for hosting this file; we make no money off of them. Subscribing to our Patreon feed will allow you to see these ad-free.