What I love being catholic, the church doesn't to judge other people... doesn't not teach to debate with other churches but pray to God for them instead... remember and this was told by God, 'you don't know all the Heavenly Things'... from this, then why should we judge? We are all imperfect... God said to love one another as much as He loved us... God can even forgive criminals, drug addicts, etc. as long as they repent wholeheartedly... if we follow and obey His laws, in that way we could love God the most... even we are not perfect.
@@madelineaspuria8036 Have you ever seen the movie Constantine?.Its all FICTION of course. But Gabriel is mad at humans because of the deal of repentance.
I was born into a Pentecostal upbringing. But starting last year, I started to change in my heart after I starting watching these type of videos. I'm pretty sure I am a Catholic at heart now. Sure, I have to join the church, but inside I think I really am haha
1 Corinthians 14:33 ESV For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, Psalm 119:11 ESV I have stored up your word in my heart, that I might not sin against you. Jesus never said to return to the verbal traditional teachings of rabbis and Moses. He would always Harkin back to the teachings of the Torah with the phrase “it is written” contrasted, with “you have heard it said. “ Matthew 4:4 ESV But he answered, "It is written, "'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.'" Scripture is absolutely central outside of church, tradition, ceremony, or action. Scripture is ALWAYS first.
@@wesleysimelane3423 then how come every protestant comes to their own conclusion when they read it? I’ll assume you’re the only Christian who has the correct interpretation right?
Wow, coming out of protestantism I see the only disadvantage to having our own bible( though its a GREAT advantage) is we come up with our own personal doctrines and interpretations, therefore it comes with divisions because we interpret our own understandings of what scripture is saying. Though my protestant background has taught me so much that I am grateful for, looking to greater things as partaking in the Eucharist. Please pray for me.
Tim Staples! You are such a blessing to me. I bought your book 'Behold Your Mother' because even I wanted to increase my devotion to our Mother. @CatholicAnswers Thank you so much for your videos. God is really changing lives through your channel.
Greetings to all! Life long Pentecostal here. Born into it and raised heavily in that church’s theology/doctrine. However, I came across these Tim Staples videos a few days ago and find them highly fascinating. However, there was something Mr. Staples mentioned that I was hoping a Catholic could explain to me, please. He mentions a Bishop walking in the room settling a scripture debate would be the same as our Lord walking in and doing it. Respectfully, because I am genuinely curios to learn, why is this so? Apostolic succession? Would his interpretation be novel or something already debated and dialogued at prior councils? If novel, does apostolic succession give him the anointing to make that type of definitive call? Thank you and God bless!
➨ The Bible ITSELF Contradicts Luther's doctrine of "scripture alone" (solascriptura) The Bible tells us that the authority is THE CHURCH: ... ● 1 TIMOTHY 3:15 The pillar & foundation of TRUTH is the CHURCH. ● EPHESIANS 3:10 10 His intent was that now, THROUGH THE CHURCH, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms, ● 2 THESS 2:15 We are to hold fast to the TRADITIONS we have been given, either by WORD OF MOUTH or by the letter. ● 1 COR 11:2 I commend you because you remember me in everything, and maintain the TRADITIONS even as I have delivered them to you. ● JOHN 21:25 Jesus said & did Many other things that are too numerous to be recorded in writing. ● HEB 13:17 Obey the eldars in the CHURCH. ● MATT 18:15-17 15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. 16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. 17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto THE CHURCH: but IF HE NEGLECTS TO HEARTHE CHURCH let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. The True Church is a TEACHING Church: (to Teach means to impart knowledge that is not presently know....not in writing) ● JOHN 14:26-31 26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall TEACH you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. (To TEACH is to impart knowledge that is not presently known....not in writing) ● ACTS 8:31: And he said, HOW CAN I, (understand scripture) EXCEPT SOMEONE SHOULD GUIDE ME? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him. (The scriptures are not for individual interpretation. They need the guidance of the CHURCH. It is PROTESTANTS who are following the doctrines of a man.) nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Luther's doctrine of "Faith alone" is ALSO False: ➨ WORKS, PENANCE, & PURGATORY (All copied from the protestant version of the Bible by me) ➨WORKS: ● REV 20:12...The dead are judged BY THEIR WORKS. ● JAMES 2:18 Faith without works is dead ● MATTEW 19:17 Jesus tells us if we want to enter into Life, we must keep the commandments. ● MATTHEW 5:16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your GOOD DEEDSand glorify your Father in heaven. ● JAMES 2:24 A man is justified by works, and not by faith only. ● ROMANS 2:6 He will judge everyone ACCORDING TO WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. ● ROMANS 2:13 13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. ● MATTHEW 7:21 Not everyone who says to me: "Lord Lord will enter into the kingdom of heaven but only those WHO DO THE WILL OF MY FATHER. ● PHILIPPIANS 2:12-13 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, WORK OUT YOUR OWN SALVATION WITH FEAR AND TREMBLING; 13 for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure. ● MATT 25:35-40 JESUS tells us to feed the hungry & clothe the naked (good works). He further warns us that those who do NOT will be sent away into the eternal fire., but those who do these WORKS will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. ● LUKE 16:19-30 The story of Lazarus and the rich man shows us that the rich man went to hell for refusing to help Lazarus who was poor and hungry. (He refused to do good works) ● TITUS 3:14 KJV And let our's also learn to maintain good works for necessary uses, that they be not unfruitful. ● EPHESIANS 2:8-11 (KJV) Protestants "prove" their false doctrine of "faith alone" By quoting EPH 2:8-9 and they STOP before they get to number 10: 8 For by GRACE are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. (most protestants stop here instead of continuing on to 10): ➨ 10 FOR WE ARE GOD'S WORKMANSHIP, CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS UNTO GOOD WORKS, WHICH GOD HAS BEFORE ORDAINED, THAT WE SHOULD WALK IN THEM. ● 1 COR 9:27 (KJV) (Paul speaking) But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a cast away. ● MATT 12:36-37 36 But I say unto you, That every idle WORD THAT MEN SHALL SOEAK, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. 37 For BY THY WORDS THOU SHALL BE JUSTIFIED, and BY THY WORDS THOU SHALL BE CONDEMNED. (not by yout faith alone) ➨PENENCE: Protestants reject the idea that they must do "penence" (attempt to make up for the sins they have committed) ● Luke 19:8. Zacchaeus told Jesus if he has cheated anyone, he will repay them 4 times over. ● Mark 2:20 Jesus said (regarding his disciples): The days are coming when the Bridegroom will be taken away from them, and then they will fast. ● Matthew 6:16 When you fast, do not look dismal, like the hypocrits do ● Acts 26:20 RSV but declared first to those at Damascus, then at Jerusalem and throughout all the country of Judea, and also to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God and perform deeds worthy of their repentance. ● Acts 2:38-40: Do Penance and be baptized everyone of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you shall recieve the gift of the Holy Spirit. For this promise is to you AND YOUR CHILDREN, and to all who are far off who the Lord our God shall call. ➨PURGATORY:. ● 2 TIMOTHY 1: 16-18. Paul prays for the dead Onesiphorus. ● 1 PETER 4:6 The gospel was preached to the dead. ● 1 PETER 3:19 , Peter says that after the crucifixion and death of Jesus, that Jesus "went to speak to the spirits in prison", which means that there is a place people go to after they die that is a prison and not heaven nor hell. ● MATT 12:32 Whoever speaks a word against the son of man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will Not be forgiven, either in this world, nor in the "world to come" This implies that some sins are forgiven in the "world to come" (purgatory) ● also 1 COR 3:12-15 & more in the Catholic Bible: (2 Mace 12:46). “It is a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead, that they might be loosed from their sins” 1 Peter 1:17
The Church is not the authority. God is the authority. Even with all of these verses used out of context, the argument for the church to have the authority is not seen. Just look where Jesus was asked where His authority came from. Simple text search or google if not familiar. I love you all and mean this with love. God is the authority not man. We don’t make the laws we are to follow them. The traditions we are to keep are the commands that God has given us in His Word.
@@slavetoChrist JESUS (who is God) Founded the CHURCH And the CHURCH produced the bible....And no, these scriptures are not out of context. Anyone who reads through this can look these up for themselves.
@@simoncampos3943 sorry but, the bible came from the CHURCH, not the other way around. It supplements the church. The Church existed 4 centuries B 4 there was a written bible and even then most people could not read. JESUS founded a CHURCH. LUTHER, who never knew Jesus and recieved no a authority from Jesus started the protestant revolt in 1517 and invented the doctrine of "scripture alone" which he used to attack the CHURCH. Protestants follow LUTHER...not Jesus
Sola Scriptura is comically, NOT in the Scriptures. On the contrary, Scriptures say: "Now I praise you, brethren, that you remember me in all things and keep the traditions just as I delivered to you." (1 Cor 11,2) Reader of the Scriptures need to be able to discern between traditions of the Jews that Lord criticized and tradition of the Christianity that Lord delivered either directly or via apostles to The Church - Eastern Orthodox Chuch.
A great majority of Protestants are possessed by a d*mon of narcissism, they are very arrogant and egotistical the d*vil use them to bully and attack catholic, and when you have to debate with them you have to understand who you are debating with because that way you will know that it is better to leave them alone and better to pray for their convertion and that the will be done of God
Yes, we must love our Protestant brothers and sisters, but that fact does not change the Truth of the One Catholic and Apostolic Church, and the vast repository of Truth, Tradition and Scripture which She has been entrusted with.
Imagine a new church WITH no bible from the time Luther was around until now. And not understanding that the details outside any future bible had to be sancrosanct. 400 years!
hebrews 13:17 * Obey your leaders and defer to them, for they keep watch over you and will have to give an account, that they may fulfill their task with joy and not with sorrow, for that would be of no advantage to you. never says submit, just obey. in definition there is a difference. neither definition implies blind submission.
I have the COMPLETE INFALLIBLE HOLY SOLA SCRIPTURA KING JESUS BIBLE. A BORN AGAIN BELIEVER WITH A RELATIONSHIP WITH MY FATHER GOD, MY SAVIOUR AND KING JESUS AND MY SWEET COMFORTER....JOHN16:13..15...HOWBEIT WHEN HE,THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH,IS COME,HE WILL GUIDE YOU INTO ALL TRUTH:FOR HE SHALL NOT SPEAK OF HIMSELF;BUT WHATSOEVER HE SHALL HEAR,THAT SHALL HE SPEAK:AND HE WILL SHOW YOU THINGS TO COME.HE SHALL GLORIFY ME:FOR HE SHALL RECEIVE OF MINE,AND SHALL SHEW IT UNTO YOU.ALL THINGS THAT THE FATHER HATH ARE MINE:THEREFORE SAID I, THAT HE SHALL TAKE OF MINE AND SHALL SHEW IT UNTO YOU.CHRIST IN ME AND I IN CHRIST.
If one carefully reads 2 timothy 3:17 we find the New Testament Scriptures are enough .... "that the man of God may be complete, furnished completely unto every good work." exartizó = "furnished completely" for "every" good work. That the New testament Scriptures are included here in this passage is confirmed in 2 Timothy 3:15 where St Paul makes reference to the wisdom that the Scriptures provide concerning salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. The Old Testament only gives us shadows and types of the coming Messiah. Only in the New Testament do we have his name manifested. Jesus. 2 timothy 3:17 makes it perfectly clear that the man of God has been furnished completely through the Scriptures (Old Testament and New Testament) for EVERY GOOD WORK. St. Paul does say that the man of God has been “partially furnish” … or “somewhat furnished,” but rather the man of God has been exartizó = "furnished completely" for "every" good work through the Scriptures of the 1st century. Likewise, Jesus told His Apostles that He would send them the Spirit of Truth, who would guide them in ALL TRUTH, (See John `16:13). Hence, the 1st century Apostles of Jesus were guided by the Spirit of Truth into ALL TRUTH as related to the faith. Jesus never promised His Apostles that New Revelations of Truth (that is, later traditions) would come centuries later through the Roman Catholic Church. Of course the following Scripture is the corker that slams the door on the traditions of the Romans Catholic Church: Jude wrote the following inspired Words: “... earnestly contend for the Faith that was ONCE FOR ALL DELIVERED UNTO THE SAINTS.” Jude 1:3 makes it clear that the Christians Faith-the body of Christian Doctrines necessary for obtaining life and godliness-was completed and delivered unto the Saints of the Church before the end of the 1st century. And guess what? Our dear Apostle Peter echoes this same sentiment in 2 Peter 1:3, 4 when he writes: “His divine power HAS GRANTED to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he HAS GRANTED to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature …” (2 Peter 1:3, 4) St. Peter makes it clear to his readers of the 1st century Church, that God “HAS GRANTED” (past perfect tense) everything they need to experience life, godliness, and the divine nature. Neither St. Peter nor any of the other Apostles ever stated that there would be subsequent writings, traditions or revelations that would enable us to experience life, godliness, and the divine nature. No, the writings of 2 Peter 1:3, 4 both declare and confirm the writings of our brother Jude who makes it clear that the Faith of the Church has “once for all been delivered (past tense) to the Saints” of the 1st Century.
Teaching, reproving, quoting, reading scriptures is not authority. 2 TIM 3:16 just states that ALL Scripture is useful, it does not say that ONLY Scripture is useful. Paul never said scripture is the only thing needed for a Christian's approval and doctrine. That is erroneous, because if that is the case, then he (Paul) would not have participated in the Council of Jerusalem and the decisions of the church to replace Judas and the dogmatic truths declared by Peter in the council. The operative word is "ONLY" and nowhere in that verses says the word "ONLY". If Paul did say that, then that would be a contradiction of his very own words in 2 THESSALONIANS 2:15 that says that it is through Sacred Tradition that we learn our beliefs. 2 THESSALONIANS 2:15 -Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle. FYI: The Holy Bible itself came from the Sacred Tradition of the church, not the unbiblical sola scriptura. Paul only states that scriptures are good for instruction and teaching (teaching tool). Paul's letter (epistle) to Timothy was not Scripture when he wrote it, so Paul was referring to the Greek OT (Septuagint, again books that protestant rejected and refuse to call Scripture), so they are not obeying Paul), since Timothy did not read Hebrew. So Paul was saying, "All the Septuagint is inspired by God and profitable for ... " But the next, even bigger, point is that Paul was acting out Tradition when he wrote this to Timothy - he was not an original Apostle but was added to the Church (baptized) by Ananias of Damascus, and finally confirmed by the Apostles in Jerusalem, granting him authority and apostleship. And Paul, using his apostolic authority made Timothy a bishop also. If Paul's writing carries any weight or validity, it is because he is the Authority of Tradition in Action and in Person. This makes Paul's statement to Timothy really say this: "Timothy, I, Paul, by my Authority to define what teaching you follow say to you that you must also give authority over yourself to all the Septuagint like you have me as an authority over you in Christ, since it is profitable for ..." Every bishop, that acts in accord with this Tradition carries the same authority today as Paul did. We trust the Bible BECAUSE WE ARE OBEDIENT TO OUR BISHOPS, OBEDIENT TO THE MAGISTERIUM, OBEDIENT TO OUR HOLY FATHER, AND THESE LIVING PEOPLE TELL US WHAT SCRIPTURE WE CAN TEACH FROM, CORRECT WITH, AND TRAIN IN RIGHTEOUSNESS WITH. We trust the Bible because the leadership we trust gives it to us, not because of some stand-alone idea about a book that came from the sky. Even scriptures say that not everything is found in scriptures JOHN 21:25 JOHN 21:25 But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written. This is the reason why Jesus gave the AUTHORITY to Peter and the church He established in MATTHEW 16:18-19 not to a book.
God is so much more than what is written in the Bible. The God that I know is infinite, what is written in the Bible is finite. How can there be an infinite God and His word be finite?
@@timharris2291 I'm not sure if you're disputing what I wrote or not. To further my statement, God's "Word" does not just pertain to verbal literature. God's "Word" does include verbal literature but it goes further. God's "Word" includes His works and His ways. This is consistent with St. John's Gospel, "In the beginning there was God's Word. In the beginning is speaking of creation. There was no verbal literature at the onset of creation. God's word includes the continual balance of nature and all that one can witness in nature. One example is that no two snowflakes are exactly alike and this phenomenon will continue to occur infinitely. This is just one example of an infinite amount of examples (or possible examples, since all things are possible with God).
@@johnp388 Apart from God himself incarnate, the only referent to "God's word" in scripture is the God-breathed scripture itself. All these other speculative additions only have the effect of reducing the power and authority of that which is truly God-breathed.
“He [Pope Frances] can say thus saith God and it’s just as if Jesus is here” So Jesus would say “If someone is gay and is looking for the Lord, who am I to judge him?” Or “God has the heart of a father, your father [an atheist] was a good man, he is in heaven with Him, be sure. God has a father’s heart and, would God ever abandon a non-believing father who baptize his children?” I wholeheartedly disagree.
Is the gospel primary or is tradition primary? If tradition derives authority from its self then the argument becomes circular. If it derives authority from an infallible source then what source is that? If authority is declared by fallible men or counsels made of sinful fallible men then the argument remains circular. However if authority is declared by God then where do we get Gods words? Words of priests??? Tradition of councils???? Or, reliable trust worthy documents? Early church fathers???? But then this creates circular reasoning still. See the logic, or lack of??? This is why scripture as the single authority rule of faith unhinges the church. God is then only sovereign so long as men agree he is by reason of cooperating grace. Earning Moratoria grace. But theres a problem. Scripture doesn’t teach merited grace. Therefore the church declares its self infallible, uses the very series of manuscripts to say its infallible all the while ignoring those documents truth. A church cant declare authority on the basis of God then ignore Gods word from the very source they claim is irrelevant without its self. Circular thinking. God validates church, church declares its self higher than scripture, but Gods authority in written form is the churches main source, but the church ignores that source for its self. Truth is, catholicism today is apostate. Gods word is revealed in only one place. Rome discourages reading scripture without filters. Yet when people read scripture alone, God changes them. He brings light to them and brings them out of Rome and closer to him. Never once does Jesus speak in favor of traditions of men. And yes, church tradition is of men even today. Whether good or bad, it belongs to the creation and incarnation of man, not God. Salvation is found no other place than holy scripture. The church is the pillar and foundation of the truth. In other words, the church is the dispenser of the gospel. The steward of the gospel, but it is not the dispenser of grace, salvation, or forgiveness of sins. A priest cannot forgive sins, because the priesthood is not biblical. The priesthood is a later development hundreds of years later. In fact, Jesus is very explicit on the nature of those leader ship roles within the church. Matthew 23:8-12 Additionally, church pastors are to be married with a family. In fact, if their family life is not solid in the eyes of God, then their ministry within the church is illegitimate. 1 Timothy 3 The reason Rome today does not see this is because Rome does not read scripture. The full council of God is not the dogmatic inflation of micro versus. The full measured council of our Lord is in the Torah first, and then the New Testament, and how they enter twine together. Forgiveness of sins is with God alone. Isaiah 43:25 Psalms 32:5 Psalms 130:4 Isaiah 1:18 Psalms 25:18 Isaiah 55:7 Psalms 86:5 The passage, Rome twist is a result of inaccurate context. Forgiving the sins of others is not a contextual platform for church leadership to possess power to forgive sins The way God does. The passage in context within matthew is talking about forgiving those who sin against you. It’s a personal forgiveness against a vendetta or action or atrocity. It is not a unilateral decree of church power. In fact, the New Testament is riddled with the echo of the Old Testament with regard to the one and only one who forgives sins. it is about our confession to God, not Men. We only confess to men as brothers and sisters in Christ for the sake of growth and moving past corporeal consequences. We find refuge in Christ through the body of believers. James 5:16 1 John 1:9 Acts 5:31 The priesthood, besides the high priest which is Christ, are those who believe in Christ 1 peter 2:9 And more importantly, a priesthood irrelevant for the true believer in Christ. Romans 7:14-28, 8:1 Salvation is of the spirit, night of the declared flesh. 1 Corinthians 14:33 ESV For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, Psalm 119:11 ESV I have stored up your word in my heart, that I might not sin against you. Jesus never said to return to the verbal traditional teachings of rabbis and Moses. He would always Harkin back to the teachings of the Torah with the phrase “it is written” contrasted, with “you have heard it said. “ Matthew 4:4 ESV But he answered, "It is written, "'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.'" Scripture is absolutely central outside of church, tradition, ceremony, or action. Scripture is ALWAYS first. My issue is not with how our church started, but rather how Rome has perverted it over the last 1500 years. Rome supposes that verbal tradition is parallel to scripture just because verbal proclamation was first. It’s supposed itself can add to that which is already been established, which is in direct conflict with the teachings of the apostles. Irenaeus (AD 180): We have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith. (Against Heresies, 3:1.1) Athanasius (AD 296-373): The holy and inspired Scriptures are fully sufficient for the proclamation of the truth. (Against the Heathen, 1:3) Notice the careful riding here. Scripture was never written by Rome. Scripture was written by the original 11+ Paul. To know, God, is not to know his church, but you know God through the Torah first. The Torah is the culmination set up of Christ and you cannot understand Christ without it. Tim staples is in gross error
The issue is though Tim that not all Bishops agree with the Catholic faith for instance the ones in Germany and other countries even Pope Francis says some awful strange things at times you have to admit that, so that blows what you just said halfway through this video. The Catholic church is not all in agreement there are many schisms, you know that.
Please read John 17 :14 "I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world. 15 My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one. 16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of it. 17 Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth." Jesus gave us His word!! The foundation of the church is the word of God!!!! The Roman Catholic Church is build on the word of man.
JOHN 17:14 does not state sola scriptura. The church was given the authority to bind and loose in MATTHEW 16:18-19 ; MATTHEW 18:18 not on a book put together by the Catholic Church in the 4th century. Sola scriptura is false and divisive that has failed and erred for 500 years
@@Rainstorm121 in the Bible, the word “ Church” means followers of Jesus. So that’s where our church comes from… We follow Jesus. It’s only in your own heads that you think Jesus sanctified the Catholic Church. That’s just a bunch of baloney. Jesus asked that everybody follow him… Not a series of stupid old men that can’t make their minds up, much less a series of stupid old men that keep changing his and his father‘s words. One of them is lying, is it God or the pope?
@@edmundzou6199 The word “ protestant” simply means people who broke away from the Catholic Church. There are many different faiths and beliefs that fall under that category. To lump us all into one “ religion” just shows how uninformed and uneducated you are. For example… Joel Osteen, the largest “ protestant” Church in the United States… Complete heretic‼️ he’s a disgrace to the name of God and the sacrifice of Jesus. I could list many many many many more. And the Catholic Church falls right in line with him… Completely heretical‼️ not following the words of Jesus, but the words of man.
Read the bible as Martin Luther Did. Salvation is not sacramental based. it is based on grace by Faith. The pope is NOT biblical nor supported in biblical truth.
If the Catholic Church is the “infallible interpreter of Scripture” then why have they only “infallibly interpreted 7 verses?” source: Trent Horn, Catholic Answers). So, Tim Staples is wrong here. He is confusing several more Catholic DOCTRINES being infallibly interpreted vs. VERSES being infallibly interpreted.
Strong's From a compound of G1537 and a derivative of G2564; a calling out, that is, (concretely) a popular meeting, especially a religious congregation (Jewish synagogue, or Christian community of members on earth or saints in heaven or both): - assembly, church. Not the RCC.
Clearly, there was a Christian congregation/ church before there was a NT. It was around 10 -20 years after Jesus before any of our NT documents were written. But where do we read about Priests? In Acts 15, we read about Apostles, Elders and the whole church/ congregation. But where are these Priests and Bishops?
@Charles : I think you are projecting a later Church ecclesiastical system back into the first century. There was no clergy laity distinction among the first Christians. The only priests were those who had been Jewish priests before their conversion.
@@zacharyvandress1120 : What is your scriptural support for this claim ? Indeed, how do you understand the term "apostle/" Are you thinking just of "The Twelve" (plus Paul?) or in the wider sense. We must be careful not to impose much later ecclesiastical systems back on the first believers.
acts 1:20 Catholic Bible 20 For it is written in the Book of Psalms: ‘Let his encampment become desolate, and may no one dwell in it.’ And: ‘May another take his office.’o 21 Therefore, it is necessary that one of the men who accompanied us the whole time the Lord Jesus came and went among us, 22 beginning from the baptism of John until the day on which he was taken up from us, become with us a witness to his resurrection.”p 23 So they proposed two, Joseph called Barsabbas, who was also known as Justus, and Matthias. 24 Then they prayed, “You, Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which one of these two you have chosen 25 to take the place in this apostolic ministry from which Judas turned away to go to his own place.” 26 * q Then they gave lots to them, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and he was counted with the eleven apostles. there's no mention of catholic structured Bishops here. its mearly a teacher replacement. The catholic church again incorrectly assuming and filling in what is not biblical. even from their own bible. Acts 20 NEVER makes refence to a Bishop designation. AGAIN, made up by this idiot of a teacher. Peaple, i am READING the bible for my self. I am challenging this man to tell the TRUTH rather than continue to lie to the others. what i think happens with this man is he left the protestant church but not before making a pack with Satan in doing so. This man pulls nonsense out of his butt continually from scripture that indicates Nothing of what his points are. this man is Purposeful in trying to mislead others. Read his Biblical Call outs. Theres NOTHING supporting his viewpoints. he's a cherry picker False prophet and i call him out as a lier and a deciever and a Lucifer worshiper
Is the New Testament not scripture? Also what is the point of having popes, bishops and such. I get pastors who are people who live a normal life, usually married with kids, financial problems and such but I do not get the point of having the Pope and such. I have always tried to keep an open mind but listening to this has made me more and more Protestant
APOSTOLIC CHURCH-THE LORD JESUS IS IT'S ONLY BUILDER AND HEAD.THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST HIS CHURCH (MATT.16:18.).IT IS MADE UP OF BORN AGAIN CHRISTIANS WHO ARE IN CHRIST AND SANCTIFIED BY THE TRUTH OF GOD'S WORD. APOSTATE CHURCH- THE POPE IS THE HEAD AND SPIRITUAL LEADER OF HIS EARTHLY CATHOLIC CHURCH AND ALL HIS BELIEVERS ARE SUBJECT (SUBMISSIVE) UNTO HIM.
Catholic Bible - again lol,...i mean man this guy is too easy to fight. 20 But as it is, there are many parts, yet one body. 21 The eye cannot say to the hand, “I do not need you,” nor again the head to the feet, “I do not need you.” 22 Indeed, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are all the more necessary, 23 and those parts of the body that we consider less honorable we surround with greater honor, and our less presentable parts are treated with greater propriety, 24 whereas our more presentable parts do not need this. But God has so constructed the body as to give greater honor to a part that is without it, 25 so that there may be no division in the body, but that the parts may have the same concern for one another. 26 If [one] part suffers, all the parts suffer with it; if one part is honored, all the parts share its joy. 27 Now you are Christ’s body, and individually parts of it.i 28 Some people God has designated in the church to be, first, apostles;* second, prophets; third, teachers; then, mighty deeds; then, gifts of healing, assistance, administration, and varieties of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work mighty deeds? 30 Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret? 31 Strive eagerly for the greatest spiritual gifts. Context is key again with this guy, wrong wrong so wrong. Read the bible and scrutinize this man heavily people. vrse 31 say it perfectly 31 Strive eagerly for the greatest spiritual gifts.are all this and that, it never says no. its not about declaration of that. its answer the path of that answer vs a declaration of what you process.
No one is infallible not even the Pope and if a doctrine does not agree with the Bible, then it is a false doctrine. There are many false doctrines in the Catholic Church. Even a Catholic Priest spoke out against them, lets see what was his name? Oh yes Martin Luther, well done Martin. May God's spirit reveal the truth to all Catholics.
The Pope is like the supreme court chief justice that once the decision has been rendered, there is no more debate. As a person, the pope is fallible. The best example for this is the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15. Although Peter was rebuked by Paul for being hypocrite, he is the one who preside the Council since he is the first Pope. In verse 11 " No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”, Peter decide that circumcision is not required. There is no new testament at that time and the scripture they knew was the old testament that requires circumcision to be saved. In Matthew 16:19 Jesus said "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." It only proves that the heaven will conform to the decisions of the church. Of course, you will not believe that even coming from the mouth of Jesus because you believe your pastor rather than Jesus Christ. In 1 Timothy 3:15 says that the church is the pillar and foundation of truth. You do not believe in the bible because you believe Martin Luther over the church that founded by Jesus Christ. You also believe that the church that Jesus established was fallen even though Jesus said that the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matthew 16:18). If you do not believe in the words of Jesus Christ, how much more in me.
The Catholic Church compiled the Bible in 382 in the council of Rome under pope damasus the 1st. Show me where in the Bible it says you can leave the church established by Christ and establish your own church? Show me where in the Bible it states where you can remove books from scripture?
@@footballtraininganddevelop1522 To believe that the Catholic Church is the church that Christ established needs quite a stretch of one's imagination. The rock upon which the church is built, is Jesus, not Peter. In 1 Peter 5:1, Peter says of himself that he was a fellow elder, no sign of primacy there. Also, he denied his Saviour three times and Jesus in Matthew 16:23 said, "Get behind me, Satan! You are an offence to Me, because you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men". How could Jesus have built the church upon sinful man? The answer is, it wasn't! The church was built upon Jesus, as scripture recognises Jesus as The Rock in a number of places....Duet. 32:18, Isa 17:10, Ps 31:3, 1 Sam 2:2, and others. In Matt 21:44, 1Pet 2:4-8, Peter refers to Jesus as the chief cornerstone. The Catholic Church need to rethink Matt 16:18. God is calling people out of the Catholic Church into His Marvellous Light. Come join us! Blessings!
@@josephwells8699 explain to me one simple thing if you may. Why did Jesus change Simons’s name to Cephas/Kepha/Peter which means rock, if Peter is not the rock? And if the Catholic Church isn’t the church establish by Christ why do you use the Bible compiled by the Catholic Church? Also would you be kind enough to name a single Protestant pastor who before the year 500 AD?
@@footballtraininganddevelop1522 The Apostles were Christians but were not Catholics, like many more Christians, before those who first called themselves Catholics and hijacked the word of God. The Catholic Church is wrong regarding.... Hell......Purgatory......Praying to images.....Praying to dead saints, and Mary.....Confessing to priests.....praying for the dead.....Penance.....The Sabbath. The Catholic Church is hemorrhaging members, and it is not surprising. In a small county near where I live, and used to live, three Catholic Churches closed in recent years and the sites now have houses on them. Christ is the Rock, not Peter. Chrysostom another church Father of the early centuries, says that Jesus promised to lay the foundation of the church upon Peters CONFESSION ( not on Peter), but elsewhere calls Christ Himself truly our foundation. Its the only thing that makes sense.
Despite major differences, I still love my Protestant brothers and sisters as I know many many Catholics also do!
Awwwwwwwwwww
Yes
@@carolenelake688 hey dont knock it. The alternative is war.
What I love being catholic, the church doesn't to judge other people... doesn't not teach to debate with other churches but pray to God for them instead... remember and this was told by God, 'you don't know all the Heavenly Things'... from this, then why should we judge? We are all imperfect... God said to love one another as much as He loved us... God can even forgive criminals, drug addicts, etc. as long as they repent wholeheartedly... if we follow and obey His laws, in that way we could love God the most... even we are not perfect.
@@madelineaspuria8036 Have you ever seen the movie Constantine?.Its all FICTION of course.
But Gabriel is mad at humans because of the deal of repentance.
I was born into a Pentecostal upbringing. But starting last year, I started to change in my heart after I starting watching these type of videos. I'm pretty sure I am a Catholic at heart now. Sure, I have to join the church, but inside I think I really am haha
Welcome back home Rico. Show the others the same thing. They have to do their research.
1 Corinthians 14:33 ESV
For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints,
Psalm 119:11 ESV
I have stored up your word in my heart, that I might not sin against you.
Jesus never said to return to the verbal traditional teachings of rabbis and Moses. He would always Harkin back to the teachings of the Torah with the phrase “it is written” contrasted, with “you have heard it said. “
Matthew 4:4 ESV
But he answered, "It is written, "'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.'"
Scripture is absolutely central outside of church, tradition, ceremony, or action. Scripture is ALWAYS first.
Tim Staples is awesome! And so is his conversion story
He is a charlatan
@@wesleysimelane3423 how on Earth is he a charlatan? Don’t be a hateful clown
@@FadeRunner13 read your own Bible for yourself on your own. & Compare it to this charlatan's rumblings. Bible is is not quantum physics
@@wesleysimelane3423 then how come every protestant comes to their own conclusion when they read it? I’ll assume you’re the only Christian who has the correct interpretation right?
@@FadeRunner13you got it wrong. the Catholics are the only ones who have twisted the Bible to fit the catechism and their (T)traditions
It surprises me how so many that probably watch this and do not understand sacred oral tradition came before the bible itself did
They don't want to understand.
@@sketchartist1964 yeah so sad
Yes, some three hundred years before there was an actual canonical bible
Si claro la tradición oral es la excusa para crear todas las nuevas doctrinas que el romanismo le dé la gana
The Catholic church is blessed to have former protestants explaining the Catholic truth. Thanks, Tim .
Wow!
I'm former AofG, been Lutheran for 25 years, now looking seriously at the Orthodox Church.
Very good argument for the Historical Church.
Wow, coming out of protestantism I see the only disadvantage to having our own bible( though its a GREAT advantage) is we come up with our own personal doctrines and interpretations, therefore it comes with divisions because we interpret our own understandings of what scripture is saying. Though my protestant background has taught me so much that I am grateful for, looking to greater things as partaking in the Eucharist. Please pray for me.
Thank you for your comment! I’ll pray for you. I came out of 26 years of Protestantism myself.
Tim Staples! You are such a blessing to me. I bought your book 'Behold Your Mother' because even I wanted to increase my devotion to our Mother.
@CatholicAnswers Thank you so much for your videos. God is really changing lives through your channel.
Greetings to all! Life long Pentecostal here. Born into it and raised heavily in that church’s theology/doctrine. However, I came across these Tim Staples videos a few days ago and find them highly fascinating. However, there was something Mr. Staples mentioned that I was hoping a Catholic could explain to me, please.
He mentions a Bishop walking in the room settling a scripture debate would be the same as our Lord walking in and doing it. Respectfully, because I am genuinely curios to learn, why is this so? Apostolic succession? Would his interpretation be novel or something already debated and dialogued at prior councils?
If novel, does apostolic succession give him the anointing to make that type of definitive call?
Thank you and God bless!
Amen!
➨ The Bible ITSELF Contradicts Luther's doctrine of "scripture alone" (solascriptura) The Bible tells us that the authority is THE CHURCH: ...
● 1 TIMOTHY 3:15 The pillar & foundation of TRUTH is the CHURCH.
● EPHESIANS 3:10 10 His intent was that now, THROUGH THE CHURCH, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,
● 2 THESS 2:15 We are to hold fast to the TRADITIONS we have been given, either by WORD OF MOUTH or by the letter.
● 1 COR 11:2 I commend you because you remember me in everything, and maintain the TRADITIONS even as I have delivered them to you.
● JOHN 21:25 Jesus said & did Many other things that are too numerous to be recorded in writing.
● HEB 13:17 Obey the eldars in the CHURCH.
● MATT 18:15-17
15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto THE CHURCH: but IF HE NEGLECTS TO HEARTHE CHURCH let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.
The True Church is a TEACHING Church: (to Teach means to impart knowledge that is not presently know....not in writing)
● JOHN 14:26-31
26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall TEACH you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
(To TEACH is to impart knowledge that is not presently known....not in writing)
● ACTS 8:31: And he said, HOW CAN I, (understand scripture) EXCEPT SOMEONE SHOULD GUIDE ME? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
(The scriptures are not for individual interpretation. They need the guidance of the CHURCH. It is PROTESTANTS who are following the doctrines of a man.)
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Luther's doctrine of "Faith alone" is ALSO False:
➨ WORKS, PENANCE, & PURGATORY (All copied from the protestant version of the Bible by me)
➨WORKS:
● REV 20:12...The dead are judged BY THEIR WORKS.
● JAMES 2:18 Faith without works is dead
● MATTEW 19:17 Jesus tells us if we want to enter into Life, we must keep the commandments.
● MATTHEW 5:16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your GOOD DEEDSand glorify your Father in heaven.
● JAMES 2:24 A man is justified by works, and not by faith only.
● ROMANS 2:6 He will judge everyone ACCORDING TO WHAT THEY HAVE DONE.
● ROMANS 2:13
13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
● MATTHEW 7:21 Not everyone who says to me: "Lord Lord will enter into the kingdom of heaven but only those WHO DO THE WILL OF MY FATHER.
● PHILIPPIANS 2:12-13 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, WORK OUT YOUR OWN SALVATION WITH FEAR AND TREMBLING; 13 for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure.
● MATT 25:35-40 JESUS tells us to feed the hungry & clothe the naked (good works). He further warns us that those who do NOT will be sent away into the eternal fire., but those who do these WORKS will enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
● LUKE 16:19-30 The story of Lazarus and the rich man shows us that the rich man went to hell for refusing to help Lazarus who was poor and hungry. (He refused to do good works)
● TITUS 3:14 KJV And let our's also learn to maintain good works for necessary uses, that they be not unfruitful.
● EPHESIANS 2:8-11 (KJV) Protestants "prove" their false doctrine of "faith alone" By quoting EPH 2:8-9 and they STOP before they get to number 10:
8 For by GRACE are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. (most protestants stop here instead of continuing on to 10):
➨ 10 FOR WE ARE GOD'S WORKMANSHIP, CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS UNTO GOOD WORKS, WHICH GOD HAS BEFORE ORDAINED, THAT WE SHOULD WALK IN THEM.
● 1 COR 9:27 (KJV) (Paul speaking) But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a cast away.
● MATT 12:36-37
36 But I say unto you, That every idle WORD THAT MEN SHALL SOEAK, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
37 For BY THY WORDS THOU SHALL BE JUSTIFIED, and BY THY WORDS THOU SHALL BE CONDEMNED.
(not by yout faith alone)
➨PENENCE: Protestants reject the idea that they must do "penence" (attempt to make up for the sins they have committed) ● Luke 19:8. Zacchaeus told Jesus if he has cheated anyone, he will repay them 4 times over.
● Mark 2:20 Jesus said (regarding his disciples): The days are coming when the Bridegroom will be taken away from them, and then they will fast.
● Matthew 6:16 When you fast, do not look dismal, like the hypocrits do
● Acts 26:20 RSV but declared first to those at Damascus, then at Jerusalem and throughout all the country of Judea, and also to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God and perform deeds worthy of their repentance.
● Acts 2:38-40: Do Penance and be baptized everyone of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you shall recieve the gift of the Holy Spirit. For this promise is to you AND YOUR CHILDREN, and to all who are far off who the Lord our God shall call.
➨PURGATORY:.
● 2 TIMOTHY 1: 16-18. Paul prays for the dead Onesiphorus.
● 1 PETER 4:6 The gospel was preached to the dead.
● 1 PETER 3:19 , Peter says that after the crucifixion and death of Jesus, that Jesus "went to speak to the spirits in prison", which means that there is a place people go to after they die that is a prison and not heaven nor hell.
● MATT 12:32 Whoever speaks a word against the son of man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will Not be forgiven, either in this world, nor in the "world to come" This implies that some sins are forgiven in the "world to come" (purgatory)
● also 1 COR 3:12-15 & more in the Catholic Bible: (2 Mace 12:46). “It is a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead, that they might be loosed from their sins”
1 Peter 1:17
The Church is not the authority. God is the authority. Even with all of these verses used out of context, the argument for the church to have the authority is not seen. Just look where Jesus was asked where His authority came from. Simple text search or google if not familiar. I love you all and mean this with love. God is the authority not man. We don’t make the laws we are to follow them. The traditions we are to keep are the commands that God has given us in His Word.
@@slavetoChrist JESUS (who is God) Founded the CHURCH And the CHURCH produced the bible....And no, these scriptures are not out of context. Anyone who reads through this can look these up for themselves.
@@cynthiax56 God inspired his text FIRST. The Church SECONDLY compiled God GIVEN testament.
@@simoncampos3943 sorry but, the bible came from the CHURCH, not the other way around. It supplements the church. The Church existed 4 centuries B 4 there was a written bible and even then most people could not read.
JESUS founded a CHURCH. LUTHER, who never knew Jesus and recieved no a authority from Jesus started the protestant revolt in 1517 and invented the doctrine of "scripture alone" which he used to attack the CHURCH. Protestants follow LUTHER...not Jesus
@@simoncampos3943 Funny how "bible believing Christians" always argue with and reject what the bible says. :)
Tell me you don't know Protestantism without telling me you don't know Protestantism.
Tim Staples was a card carrying Protestant arguing against the Catholic Church for many years. Through much study and prayer he’s now Catholic.
@@faithofourfathers yeah, he's demonstrated that he's either ignorant of Confessional Protestantism or is being dishonest.
Sola Scriptura is comically, NOT in the Scriptures. On the contrary, Scriptures say: "Now I praise you, brethren, that you remember me in all things and keep the traditions just as I delivered to you." (1 Cor 11,2) Reader of the Scriptures need to be able to discern between traditions of the Jews that Lord criticized and tradition of the Christianity that Lord delivered either directly or via apostles to The Church - Eastern Orthodox Chuch.
UA-cam babylon is alive and well by David Assherick
UA-cam babylon is alive and well by David Assherick
A great majority of Protestants are possessed by a d*mon of narcissism, they are very arrogant and egotistical the d*vil use them to bully and attack catholic, and when you have to debate with them you have to understand who you are debating with because that way you will know that it is better to leave them alone and better to pray for their convertion and that the will be done of God
Why misquote Scripture? Or what translation is used? Just wondering?
What did he misquote?
Yes, we must love our Protestant brothers and sisters, but that fact does not change the Truth of the One Catholic and Apostolic Church, and the vast repository of Truth, Tradition and Scripture which She has been entrusted with.
What do they do? Let's get our Bibles out and ague? No they don't! Lmho
Imagine a new church WITH no bible from the time Luther was around until now.
And not understanding that the details outside any future bible had to be sancrosanct.
400 years!
hebrews 13:17
* Obey your leaders and defer to them, for they keep watch over you and will have to give an account, that they may fulfill their task with joy and not with sorrow, for that would be of no advantage to you.
never says submit, just obey. in definition there is a difference. neither definition implies blind submission.
Why Shepherd of Hermas?
I have the COMPLETE INFALLIBLE HOLY SOLA SCRIPTURA KING JESUS BIBLE. A BORN AGAIN BELIEVER WITH A RELATIONSHIP WITH MY FATHER GOD, MY SAVIOUR AND KING JESUS AND MY SWEET COMFORTER....JOHN16:13..15...HOWBEIT WHEN HE,THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH,IS COME,HE WILL GUIDE YOU INTO ALL TRUTH:FOR HE SHALL NOT SPEAK OF HIMSELF;BUT WHATSOEVER HE SHALL HEAR,THAT SHALL HE SPEAK:AND HE WILL SHOW YOU THINGS TO COME.HE SHALL GLORIFY ME:FOR HE SHALL RECEIVE OF MINE,AND SHALL SHEW IT UNTO YOU.ALL THINGS THAT THE FATHER HATH ARE MINE:THEREFORE SAID I, THAT HE SHALL TAKE OF MINE AND SHALL SHEW IT UNTO YOU.CHRIST IN ME AND I IN CHRIST.
If one carefully reads 2 timothy 3:17 we find the New Testament Scriptures are enough .... "that the man of God may be complete, furnished completely unto every good work." exartizó = "furnished completely" for "every" good work. That the New testament Scriptures are included here in this passage is confirmed in 2 Timothy 3:15 where St Paul makes reference to the wisdom that the Scriptures provide concerning salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. The Old Testament only gives us shadows and types of the coming Messiah. Only in the New Testament do we have his name manifested. Jesus.
2 timothy 3:17 makes it perfectly clear that the man of God has been furnished completely through the Scriptures (Old Testament and New Testament) for EVERY GOOD WORK. St. Paul does say that the man of God has been “partially furnish” … or “somewhat furnished,” but rather the man of God has been exartizó = "furnished completely" for "every" good work through the Scriptures of the 1st century.
Likewise, Jesus told His Apostles that He would send them the Spirit of Truth, who would guide them in ALL TRUTH, (See John `16:13). Hence, the 1st century Apostles of Jesus were guided by the Spirit of Truth into ALL TRUTH as related to the faith. Jesus never promised His Apostles that New Revelations of Truth (that is, later traditions) would come centuries later through the Roman Catholic Church.
Of course the following Scripture is the corker that slams the door on the traditions of the Romans Catholic Church:
Jude wrote the following inspired Words: “... earnestly contend for the Faith that was ONCE FOR ALL DELIVERED UNTO THE SAINTS.” Jude 1:3 makes it clear that the Christians Faith-the body of Christian Doctrines necessary for obtaining life and godliness-was completed and delivered unto the Saints of the Church before the end of the 1st century.
And guess what? Our dear Apostle Peter echoes this same sentiment in 2 Peter 1:3, 4 when he writes:
“His divine power HAS GRANTED to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he HAS GRANTED to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature …” (2 Peter 1:3, 4)
St. Peter makes it clear to his readers of the 1st century Church, that God “HAS GRANTED” (past perfect tense) everything they need to experience life, godliness, and the divine nature.
Neither St. Peter nor any of the other Apostles ever stated that there would be subsequent writings, traditions or revelations that would enable us to experience life, godliness, and the divine nature. No, the writings of 2 Peter 1:3, 4 both declare and confirm the writings of our brother Jude who makes it clear that the Faith of the Church has “once for all been delivered (past tense) to the Saints” of the 1st Century.
Teaching, reproving, quoting, reading scriptures is not authority. 2 TIM 3:16 just states that ALL Scripture is useful, it does not say that ONLY Scripture is useful. Paul never said scripture is the only thing needed for a Christian's approval and doctrine. That is erroneous, because if that is the case, then he (Paul) would not have participated in the Council of Jerusalem and the decisions of the church to replace Judas and the dogmatic truths declared by Peter in the council. The operative word is "ONLY" and nowhere in that verses says the word "ONLY". If Paul did say that, then that would be a contradiction of his very own words in 2 THESSALONIANS 2:15 that says that it is through Sacred Tradition that we learn our beliefs.
2 THESSALONIANS 2:15 -Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.
FYI: The Holy Bible itself came from the Sacred Tradition of the church, not the unbiblical sola scriptura. Paul only states that scriptures are good for instruction and teaching (teaching tool). Paul's letter (epistle) to Timothy was not Scripture when he wrote it, so Paul was referring to the Greek OT (Septuagint, again books that protestant rejected and refuse to call Scripture), so they are not obeying Paul), since Timothy did not read Hebrew. So Paul was saying, "All the Septuagint is inspired by God and profitable for ... "
But the next, even bigger, point is that Paul was acting out Tradition when he wrote this to Timothy - he was not an original Apostle but was added to the Church (baptized) by Ananias of Damascus, and finally confirmed by the Apostles in Jerusalem, granting him authority and apostleship. And Paul, using his apostolic authority made Timothy a bishop also. If Paul's writing carries any weight or validity, it is because he is the Authority of Tradition in Action and in Person. This makes Paul's statement to Timothy really say this: "Timothy, I, Paul, by my Authority to define what teaching you follow say to you that you must also give authority over yourself to all the Septuagint like you have me as an authority over you in Christ, since it is profitable for ..."
Every bishop, that acts in accord with this Tradition carries the same authority today as Paul did. We trust the Bible BECAUSE WE ARE OBEDIENT TO OUR BISHOPS, OBEDIENT TO THE MAGISTERIUM, OBEDIENT TO OUR HOLY FATHER, AND THESE LIVING PEOPLE TELL US WHAT SCRIPTURE WE CAN TEACH FROM, CORRECT WITH, AND TRAIN IN RIGHTEOUSNESS WITH. We trust the Bible because the leadership we trust gives it to us, not because of some stand-alone idea about a book that came from the sky.
Even scriptures say that not everything is found in scriptures JOHN 21:25
JOHN 21:25 But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written.
This is the reason why Jesus gave the AUTHORITY to Peter and the church He established in MATTHEW 16:18-19 not to a book.
God is so much more than what is written in the Bible. The God that I know is infinite, what is written in the Bible is finite. How can there be an infinite God and His word be finite?
“I love you”
Is finite and infinite
Infinite = not limited by anything outside himself.
Not limited --> is able to communicate verbally with his creatures.
@@timharris2291 I'm not sure if you're disputing what I wrote or not. To further my statement, God's "Word" does not just pertain to verbal literature. God's "Word" does include verbal literature but it goes further. God's "Word" includes His works and His ways. This is consistent with St. John's Gospel, "In the beginning there was God's Word. In the beginning is speaking of creation. There was no verbal literature at the onset of creation. God's word includes the continual balance of nature and all that one can witness in nature. One example is that no two snowflakes are exactly alike and this phenomenon will continue to occur infinitely. This is just one example of an infinite amount of examples (or possible examples, since all things are possible with God).
@@johnp388 Apart from God himself incarnate, the only referent to "God's word" in scripture is the God-breathed scripture itself. All these other speculative additions only have the effect of reducing the power and authority of that which is truly God-breathed.
“He [Pope Frances] can say thus saith God and it’s just as if Jesus is here”
So Jesus would say “If someone is gay and is looking for the Lord, who am I to judge him?” Or “God has the heart of a father, your father [an atheist] was a good man, he is in heaven with Him, be sure. God has a father’s heart and, would God ever abandon a non-believing father who baptize his children?”
I wholeheartedly disagree.
Is the gospel primary or is tradition primary? If tradition derives authority from its self then the argument becomes circular. If it derives authority from an infallible source then what source is that? If authority is declared by fallible men or counsels made of sinful fallible men then the argument remains circular. However if authority is declared by God then where do we get Gods words? Words of priests??? Tradition of councils???? Or, reliable trust worthy documents? Early church fathers???? But then this creates circular reasoning still.
See the logic, or lack of??? This is why scripture as the single authority rule of faith unhinges the church. God is then only sovereign so long as men agree he is by reason of cooperating grace. Earning Moratoria grace. But theres a problem. Scripture doesn’t teach merited grace.
Therefore the church declares its self infallible, uses the very series of manuscripts to say its infallible all the while ignoring those documents truth. A church cant declare authority on the basis of God then ignore Gods word from the very source they claim is irrelevant without its self. Circular thinking. God validates church, church declares its self higher than scripture, but Gods authority in written form is the churches main source, but the church ignores that source for its self.
Truth is, catholicism today is apostate.
Gods word is revealed in only one place. Rome discourages reading scripture without filters. Yet when people read scripture alone, God changes them. He brings light to them and brings them out of Rome and closer to him.
Never once does Jesus speak in favor of traditions of men. And yes, church tradition is of men even today. Whether good or bad, it belongs to the creation and incarnation of man, not God.
Salvation is found no other place than holy scripture. The church is the pillar and foundation of the truth. In other words, the church is the dispenser of the gospel. The steward of the gospel, but it is not the dispenser of grace, salvation, or forgiveness of sins.
A priest cannot forgive sins, because the priesthood is not biblical. The priesthood is a later development hundreds of years later. In fact, Jesus is very explicit on the nature of those leader ship roles within the church.
Matthew 23:8-12
Additionally, church pastors are to be married with a family. In fact, if their family life is not solid in the eyes of God, then their ministry within the church is illegitimate.
1 Timothy 3
The reason Rome today does not see this is because Rome does not read scripture. The full council of God is not the dogmatic inflation of micro versus. The full measured council of our Lord is in the Torah first, and then the New Testament, and how they enter twine together.
Forgiveness of sins is with God alone.
Isaiah 43:25
Psalms 32:5
Psalms 130:4
Isaiah 1:18
Psalms 25:18
Isaiah 55:7
Psalms 86:5
The passage, Rome twist is a result of inaccurate context.
Forgiving the sins of others is not a contextual platform for church leadership to possess power to forgive sins The way God does. The passage in context within matthew is talking about forgiving those who sin against you. It’s a personal forgiveness against a vendetta or action or atrocity. It is not a unilateral decree of church power.
In fact, the New Testament is riddled with the echo of the Old Testament with regard to the one and only one who forgives sins. it is about our confession to God, not Men. We only confess to men as brothers and sisters in Christ for the sake of growth and moving past corporeal consequences. We find refuge in Christ through the body of believers.
James 5:16
1 John 1:9
Acts 5:31
The priesthood, besides the high priest which is Christ, are those who believe in Christ
1 peter 2:9
And more importantly, a priesthood irrelevant for the true believer in Christ.
Romans 7:14-28, 8:1
Salvation is of the spirit, night of the declared flesh.
1 Corinthians 14:33 ESV
For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints,
Psalm 119:11 ESV
I have stored up your word in my heart, that I might not sin against you.
Jesus never said to return to the verbal traditional teachings of rabbis and Moses. He would always Harkin back to the teachings of the Torah with the phrase “it is written” contrasted, with “you have heard it said. “
Matthew 4:4 ESV
But he answered, "It is written, "'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.'"
Scripture is absolutely central outside of church, tradition, ceremony, or action. Scripture is ALWAYS first.
My issue is not with how our church started, but rather how Rome has perverted it over the last 1500 years.
Rome supposes that verbal tradition is parallel to scripture just because verbal proclamation was first. It’s supposed itself can add to that which is already been established, which is in direct conflict with the teachings of the apostles.
Irenaeus (AD 180): We have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith. (Against Heresies, 3:1.1)
Athanasius (AD 296-373): The holy and inspired Scriptures are fully sufficient for the proclamation of the truth. (Against the Heathen, 1:3)
Notice the careful riding here. Scripture was never written by Rome. Scripture was written by the original 11+ Paul.
To know, God, is not to know his church, but you know God through the Torah first. The Torah is the culmination set up of Christ and you cannot understand Christ without it.
Tim staples is in gross error
The issue is though Tim that not all Bishops agree with the Catholic faith for instance the ones in Germany and other countries even Pope Francis says some awful strange things at times you have to admit that, so that blows what you just said halfway through this video. The Catholic church is not all in agreement there are many schisms, you know that.
Please read John 17 :14 "I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world. 15 My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one. 16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of it. 17 Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth." Jesus gave us His word!! The foundation of the church is the word of God!!!! The Roman Catholic Church is build on the word of man.
@@Rainstorm121 The teachings of Jesus Christ and His apostles.
@@marolson2 I'm sorry your church sprang up because of luther
JOHN 17:14 does not state sola scriptura. The church was given the authority to bind and loose in MATTHEW 16:18-19 ; MATTHEW 18:18 not on a book put together by the Catholic Church in the 4th century. Sola scriptura is false and divisive that has failed and erred for 500 years
@@Rainstorm121 in the Bible, the word “ Church” means followers of Jesus. So that’s where our church comes from… We follow Jesus. It’s only in your own heads that you think Jesus sanctified the Catholic Church. That’s just a bunch of baloney. Jesus asked that everybody follow him… Not a series of stupid old men that can’t make their minds up, much less a series of stupid old men that keep changing his and his father‘s words. One of them is lying, is it God or the pope?
@@edmundzou6199 The word “ protestant” simply means people who broke away from the Catholic Church. There are many different faiths and beliefs that fall under that category. To lump us all into one “ religion” just shows how uninformed and uneducated you are. For example… Joel Osteen, the largest “ protestant” Church in the United States… Complete heretic‼️ he’s a disgrace to the name of God and the sacrifice of Jesus. I could list many many many many more. And the Catholic Church falls right in line with him… Completely heretical‼️ not following the words of Jesus, but the words of man.
Tim Staples clearly loses this battle. He wasn't able to come anywhere near refuting the caller's thesis.
I disagree, he answered is at 2:20… maybe not the answer you’re looking for but he did… nor was it a battle but a simple question…
Read the bible as Martin Luther Did. Salvation is not sacramental based. it is based on grace by Faith. The pope is NOT biblical nor supported in biblical truth.
UA-cam does Jesus have a twin by David Assherick
If the Catholic Church is the “infallible interpreter of Scripture” then why have they only “infallibly interpreted 7 verses?” source: Trent Horn, Catholic Answers). So, Tim Staples is wrong here. He is confusing several more Catholic DOCTRINES being infallibly interpreted vs. VERSES being infallibly interpreted.
A meandering reply that does not address the question of ultimate authority.
This man is a charlatan with the gift of the gab
Peter was given authority from Jesus.
@@nosuchthing8 yep
Strong's
From a compound of G1537 and a derivative of G2564; a calling out, that is, (concretely) a popular meeting, especially a religious congregation (Jewish synagogue, or Christian community of members on earth or saints in heaven or both): - assembly, church. Not the RCC.
Does that make sense Timothy? Oh gosh Timothy... none of it does!!
Clearly, there was a Christian congregation/ church before there was a NT. It was around 10 -20 years after Jesus before any of our NT documents were written. But where do we read about Priests?
In Acts 15, we read about Apostles, Elders and the whole church/ congregation. But where are these Priests and Bishops?
@Charles : No !
@Charles : alter the fact? So the word for priest is the same as the word for elder? Elders were to be the husband of one wife.
Every apostle was a Bishop
@Charles : I think you are projecting a later Church ecclesiastical system back into the first century. There was no clergy laity distinction among the first Christians. The only priests were those who had been Jewish priests before their conversion.
@@zacharyvandress1120 : What is your scriptural support for this claim ? Indeed, how do you understand the term "apostle/" Are you thinking just of "The Twelve" (plus Paul?) or in the wider sense. We must be careful not to impose much later ecclesiastical systems back on the first believers.
acts 1:20 Catholic Bible
20
For it is written in the Book of Psalms:
‘Let his encampment become desolate,
and may no one dwell in it.’
And:
‘May another take his office.’o
21
Therefore, it is necessary that one of the men who accompanied us the whole time the Lord Jesus came and went among us,
22
beginning from the baptism of John until the day on which he was taken up from us, become with us a witness to his resurrection.”p
23
So they proposed two, Joseph called Barsabbas, who was also known as Justus, and Matthias.
24
Then they prayed, “You, Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which one of these two you have chosen
25
to take the place in this apostolic ministry from which Judas turned away to go to his own place.”
26
* q Then they gave lots to them, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and he was counted with the eleven apostles.
there's no mention of catholic structured Bishops here. its mearly a teacher replacement. The catholic church again incorrectly assuming and filling in what is not biblical. even from their own bible. Acts 20 NEVER makes refence to a Bishop designation. AGAIN, made up by this idiot of a teacher. Peaple, i am READING the bible for my self. I am challenging this man to tell the TRUTH rather than continue to lie to the others.
what i think happens with this man is he left the protestant church but not before making a pack with Satan in doing so. This man pulls nonsense out of his butt continually from scripture that indicates Nothing of what his points are. this man is Purposeful in trying to mislead others. Read his Biblical Call outs. Theres NOTHING supporting his viewpoints. he's a cherry picker False prophet and i call him out as a lier and a deciever and a Lucifer worshiper
Jesus is my shepherd and I will heard only his voice and word (Bible) because am still his sheep 🐑 because there are many wolves
Jesus said to listen to the church
@@PInk77W1 listen to the church holds the teaching of scripture not man
@@charnelallan7159 yes
the Roman Catholic Church.
@@charnelallan7159 the catholic church holds the teachings of Jesus Christ himself
@@andreeattieh2963 where in purgatory Mary the country redemptrix the Vatican world Bank
Is the New Testament not scripture? Also what is the point of having popes, bishops and such. I get pastors who are people who live a normal life, usually married with kids, financial problems and such but I do not get the point of having the Pope and such. I have always tried to keep an open mind but listening to this has made me more and more Protestant
Well Jesus passed on his authority to Peter, the first pope. The gates of hell shall not destroy the church, or some such.
IP
APOSTOLIC CHURCH-THE LORD JESUS IS IT'S ONLY BUILDER AND HEAD.THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST HIS CHURCH (MATT.16:18.).IT IS MADE UP OF BORN AGAIN CHRISTIANS WHO ARE IN CHRIST AND SANCTIFIED BY THE TRUTH OF GOD'S WORD. APOSTATE CHURCH- THE POPE IS THE HEAD AND SPIRITUAL LEADER OF HIS EARTHLY CATHOLIC CHURCH AND ALL HIS BELIEVERS ARE SUBJECT (SUBMISSIVE) UNTO HIM.
UA-cam does God have a church on earth by David Assherick
Jesus said
“I will build MY Church.”
UA-cam babylon is alive and well by David Assherick
Catholic Bible - again lol,...i mean man this guy is too easy to fight.
20 But as it is, there are many parts, yet one body.
21 The eye cannot say to the hand, “I do not need you,” nor again the head to the feet, “I do not need you.”
22 Indeed, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are all the more necessary,
23 and those parts of the body that we consider less honorable we surround with greater honor, and our less presentable parts are treated with greater propriety,
24 whereas our more presentable parts do not need this. But God has so constructed the body as to give greater honor to a part that is without it,
25 so that there may be no division in the body, but that the parts may have the same concern for one another.
26 If [one] part suffers, all the parts suffer with it; if one part is honored, all the parts share its joy.
27 Now you are Christ’s body, and individually parts of it.i
28 Some people God has designated in the church to be, first, apostles;* second, prophets; third, teachers; then, mighty deeds; then, gifts of healing, assistance, administration, and varieties of tongues.
29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work mighty deeds?
30 Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret?
31 Strive eagerly for the greatest spiritual gifts.
Context is key again with this guy, wrong wrong so wrong. Read the bible and scrutinize this man heavily people. vrse 31 say it perfectly 31 Strive eagerly for the greatest spiritual gifts.are all this and that, it never says no. its not about declaration of that. its answer the path of that answer vs a declaration of what you process.
No one is infallible not even the Pope and if a doctrine does not agree with the Bible, then it is a false doctrine. There are many false doctrines in the Catholic Church. Even a Catholic Priest spoke out against them, lets see what was his name? Oh yes Martin Luther, well done Martin. May God's spirit reveal the truth to all Catholics.
The Pope is like the supreme court chief justice that once the decision has been rendered, there is no more debate. As a person, the pope is fallible. The best example for this is the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15. Although Peter was rebuked by Paul for being hypocrite, he is the one who preside the Council since he is the first Pope. In verse 11 " No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”, Peter decide that circumcision is not required. There is no new testament at that time and the scripture they knew was the old testament that requires circumcision to be saved. In Matthew 16:19 Jesus said "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." It only proves that the heaven will conform to the decisions of the church. Of course, you will not believe that even coming from the mouth of Jesus because you believe your pastor rather than Jesus Christ. In 1 Timothy 3:15 says that the church is the pillar and foundation of truth. You do not believe in the bible because you believe Martin Luther over the church that founded by Jesus Christ. You also believe that the church that Jesus established was fallen even though Jesus said that the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matthew 16:18). If you do not believe in the words of Jesus Christ, how much more in me.
The Catholic Church compiled the Bible in 382 in the council of Rome under pope damasus the 1st. Show me where in the Bible it says you can leave the church established by Christ and establish your own church? Show me where in the Bible it states where you can remove books from scripture?
@@footballtraininganddevelop1522 To believe that the Catholic Church is the church that Christ established needs quite a stretch of one's imagination. The rock upon which the church is built, is Jesus, not Peter. In 1 Peter 5:1, Peter says of himself that he was a fellow elder, no sign of primacy there. Also, he denied his Saviour three times and Jesus in Matthew 16:23 said, "Get behind me, Satan! You are an offence to Me, because you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men". How could Jesus have built the church upon sinful man? The answer is, it wasn't! The church was built upon Jesus, as scripture recognises Jesus as The Rock in a number of places....Duet. 32:18, Isa 17:10, Ps 31:3, 1 Sam 2:2, and others. In Matt 21:44, 1Pet 2:4-8, Peter refers to Jesus as the chief cornerstone. The Catholic Church need to rethink Matt 16:18. God is calling people out of the Catholic Church into His Marvellous Light. Come join us! Blessings!
@@josephwells8699 explain to me one simple thing if you may. Why did Jesus change Simons’s name to Cephas/Kepha/Peter which means rock, if Peter is not the rock? And if the Catholic Church isn’t the church establish by Christ why do you use the Bible compiled by the Catholic Church? Also would you be kind enough to name a single Protestant pastor who before the year 500 AD?
@@footballtraininganddevelop1522 The Apostles were Christians but were not Catholics, like many more Christians, before those who first called themselves Catholics and hijacked the word of God.
The Catholic Church is wrong regarding....
Hell......Purgatory......Praying to images.....Praying to dead saints, and Mary.....Confessing to priests.....praying for the dead.....Penance.....The Sabbath.
The Catholic Church is hemorrhaging members, and it is not surprising. In a small county near where I live, and used to live, three Catholic Churches closed in recent years and the sites now have houses on them.
Christ is the Rock, not Peter. Chrysostom another church Father of the early centuries, says that Jesus promised to lay the foundation of the church upon Peters CONFESSION ( not on Peter), but elsewhere calls Christ Himself truly our foundation. Its the only thing that makes sense.
This sayith God? I find that heresy. You can not make a decision on behalf of God, that is straight up wrong sorry
History doesn't back, the bible! Lies and fiction!
Popes
1 Peter (33-67)
2 Linus
3 Cletus
4 Clement
5 Evaristus
6 Alexander
7 Sixtus
8 Telephonus
9 Hyginus
10 Pius
11 Aincetus
12 Soter
13 Eleutherius (175-189)
14 Victor (189-199)
15 Zephyrinus (199-217)
16 Callistus (217-222)
17 Urban l (222-230)
18 Pontian (230-235)
19 Anterus (235-236)
20 Fabian (236-250)
21 Cornelius (251-253)
22 Lucius l (253-254)
23 Stephen (254-257)
24 Sixtus ll (257-258)
25 Dionysius (258-268)
26 Felix (268-274)
27 Eutychain (274-283)
28 Caius (283-296)
29 Marcellinus (296-304)
30 Marcellus (304-309)
31 Eusebius (309)
32 Miltiades (311-314)
33 Sylvester (314-335)
34 Mark (336)
35 Julius (336-352)
36 Liberius (352-366)
37 Damasus (366-384)
38 Siricius (384-399)
39 Anastasius (399-401)
40 Innocent (401-417)
41 Zosimus (417-418)
42 Boniface (418-422)
43 Celestine (422-432)
44 Sixtus ll (432-440)
45 Leo (440-461)
46 Hilarus (461-468)
47 Simplicius (468-483)
48 Felix ll (483-492)
49 Gelasius (492-496)
50 Anastasius ll (496-498)
51 Stymmachus (498-514)
52 Hormisdas (514-523)
53 John (523-526)
54 Felix lV (526-530)
55 Boniface ll (530-532)
56 John ll (532-535)
57 Agapitus (535-536)
58 Silverius (536-537)
59 Vigilius (537-555)
60 Pelagius (555-561)
61 John lll (561-574)
62 Benedict (574-579)
63 Pelagius (579-590)
64 St. Gregory (590-604)
65 Sabinian (604-606)
66 Boniface lll (607)
67 St Boniface lV (607-615)
68 Adeodatus (615-618)
69 Boniface V (618-625)
70 Honorius (625-638)
71 Severinus (640)
72 John lV (640-642)
73 Theodore (642-649)
74 St Martin (649-655)
75 St Eugene (655-657)
76 St Vitalian (657-672)
77 Adeodatus (672-676)
78 Donus (676-678)
79 Agatho (678-681)
80 St Leo ll (681-683)
81 St. Benedict ll (683-685)
82 John V (685-686)
83 Conon (686-687)
84 St Sergius (687-701)
85 John Vl (701-705)
86 John Vll (705-707)
87 Sissinius (708)
88 Constantine (708-715)
89 St Gregory ll (715-731)
90 St. Gregory lll (731-741)
91 St Zacharius (741-752)
92 Stephen ll (752-757)
93 St. Paul (757-767)
94 St. Stephen lll (767-772)
95 Hadrian (772-795)
96 St. Leo lll (795-816)
97 Stephen lV (816-817)
98 St. Paschal (817-824)
99 Eugene ll (824-827)
100 Valentine (827)
101 Gregory lV (827-844)
102 Sergius ll (844-847)
103 St. Leo lV (847-855)
104 Benedict lll (855-858)
105 St. Nicholas (858-867)
106 Hadrian ll (867-872)
107 John Vlll (872-882)
108 Marinus (882-884)
109 St Hadrian lll (884-885)
110 Stephen V (885-891)
111 Formosus (891-896)
112 Boniface Vl (896)
113 Stephen Vl (897)
114 Romanus (897)
115 Theodore ll (897)
116 John lX (897-900)
117 Benedict lV (900-903)
118 Leo V (903)
119 Sergius lll (904-911)
120 Anastasius lll (911-913)
121 Lando (913-914)
122 John X (914-928)
123 Leo Vl (928)
124 Stephen (928-931)
125 John Xl (931-935)
126 Leo Vll (936-939)
127 Stephen Vlll (939-942)
128 Marinus ll (942-946)
129 Agapitus ll (946-955)
130 John Xll (955-964)
131 Leo Vlll (964-965)
132 Benedict V (965-966)
133 John Xlll (966-972)
134 Benedict Vl (972-974)
135 Benedict Vll (974-983)
136 John XlV (983-984)
137 John XV (984-996)
138 Gregory V (996-999)
139 Sylvester ll (999-1003)
140 John XVll (1003)
141 John XVlll (1003-1009)
142 Sergius lV (1009-1012)
143 Benedict Vlll (1012-1024)
144 John XlX (1024-1032)
145 Benedict lX 1032-1044)
146 Sylvester lll (1045)
147 Benedict lX (1045)
148 Gregory Vl (1045-1046)
149 Clement ll (1046-1047)
150 Benedict lX (1047-1048)
151 Damasus ll (1048)
152 St. Leo lX (1048-1054)
153 Victor ll (1054-1057)
154 Stephen lX. (1057-1058)
155 Nicholas ll (1058-1061)
156 Alexander ll (1061-1073)
157 Gregory Vll (1073-1085)
158 Bl Victor lll (1085-1087)
159 Bl. Urban ll (1087-1099)
160 Paschal ll (1099-1118)
161 Gelasius ll (1118-1119)
162 Callistus (1119-1124)
163 Honorus ll (1124-1130)
164 Innocent ll (1130-1143)
165 Celestine ll (1143-1144)
166 Lucius ll (1144-1145)
167 Bl. Eugene lll (1145-1153)
168 Anastasius lV (1153-1154)
169 Hadrian lV (1154-1159)
170 Alexander lll (1159-1181)
171 Lucius lll (1181-1185)
172 Urban lll (1185-1187)
173 Gregory Vlll (1187)
174 Clement lll (1187-1191)
175 Celestine lll (1191-1198)
176 Innocent lll (1198-1216)
177 Honorius lll (1216-1227)
178 Gregory lX (1227-1241)
179 Celestine lV (1241)
180 Innocent lV (1241-1254)
181 Alexander lV (1254-1261)
182 Urban lV (1261-1264)
183 Clement IV (1264-1268)
184 Bl Gregory X (1268-1276)
185 Bl. Innocent V (1276)
186 Hadrian V (1276)
187 John XXl 1276-1277)
188 Nicholas lll (1277-1280)
189 Martin lV (1280-1285)
190 Honorius lV (1285-1287)
191 Nicholas IV (1287-1292)
192 St. Celestine V (1292-1294)
193 Boniface Vlll (1294-1303)
194 Bl. Benedict Xl (1303-1304)
195 Clement V (1304-1314)
196 John XXll (1314-1334)
197 Benedict Xll (1334-1342)
198 Clement Vl (1342-1352)
199 Innocent Vl (1352-1362)
200 Bl Urban V (1362-1370)
201 Gregory Xl (1370-1378)
202 Urban Vl (1378-1389)
203 Boniface lX (1389-1404)
204 Innocent Vll (1404-1406)
205 Gregory Xll (1406-1415)
206 Martin V (1415-1431)
207 Eugene lV (1431-1447)
208 Nicholas V (1447-1455)
209 Calixtus lll (1455-1458)
210 Pius (1458-1464)
211 Pius ll (1464-1471)
212 Sixtus lV 1471-1484)
213 Innocent Vlll (1484-1492)
214 Alexander Vl (1492-1503)
215 Pius lll (1503)
216 Julius ll (1503-1513)
217 Leo X (1513-1521)
218 Hadrian Vl (1521-1523)
219 Clement Vll (1523-1534)
220 Paul lll (1534-1549)
221 Julius lll (1549-1555)
222 Marcellus ll (1555)
223 Paul lV (1555-1559)
224 Paul lV (1559-1565)
225 St Pius V (1565-1572)
226 Gregory Xlll (1572-1585)
227 Sixtus V (1585-1590)
228 Urban Vll (1590)
229 Gregory XlV (1590-1591)
230 Innocent lX (1591)
231 Clement Vlll (1591-1605)
232 Leo Xl (1605)
233 Paul V (1605-1621)
234 Gregory XV (1621-1623)
235 Urban Vlll (1623-1644)
236 Innocent X (1644-1655)
237 Alexander Vll (1655-1667)
238 Clement lX (1667-1669)
239 Clement X (1669-1676)
240 Bl. Innocent Xl (1676-1689)
241 Alexander Vlll (1689-1691)
242 Innocent Xll (1691-1700)
243 Clement Xl (1700-1721)
244 Innocent Xlll (1721-1724)
245 Benedict Xlll (1724-1730)
246 Clement Xll (1730-1740)
247 Benedict XlV (1740-1758)
248 Clement Xlll (1758-1769)
249 Clement XlV (1769-1774)
250 Pius Vl (1774-1799)
251 Pius Vll (1799-1823)
252 Leo Xll (1823-1829)
253 Pius Vlll (1829-1830)
254 Gregory XVl (1831-1846)
255 Pius lX (1846-1878)
256 Leo Xlll (1878-1903)
257 St. Pius X (1903-1914)
258 Benedict XV (1914-1922)
259 Pius Xl (1922-1939)
260 Pius Xll (1939-1958)
261 St. John XXlll (1958-1963)
262 Paul Vl (1963-1978)
263 John Paul (1978)
264 John Paul ll (1978-2005)
265 Benedict XVl (2005-2013)
266 Francis 2013-
@@PInk77W1 Try looking before, the goat herders wrote bible! Indian temples, from 40,000 years ago, but your god is right, wrong!
@@jjpmcc we have looked. I’ve been to India many times. Thx
@@PInk77W1 can't you see? Hyrogliths all around world?
@@jjpmcc nice and none of them can compare to Jesus. Not even close.