Not only is this feature a great addition to the program, but your analysis of Google's interpretation of AI content is spot on. I think more people should be paying attention to your analysis.
"answer the user´s search intent" is just one piece of the puzzle, we need to also show signals to Google that we´re in fact an authority on that field. Otherwise, despite effectively answering/addressing the search intent, our content won´t rank. But, this is a GREAT feature to have!
Hi Matt I saw in the video you used mimic style, is that what drives the way the whole article is structured? Like starting with a quick answer then table of content ... or is that the default structure regardless of mimicking the style?
Looks cool. I can still write for Bing at least heh. Also, be cool if the article linked out to the aquarium. Haven't been following as much as of late, maybe it can.
Great job Matt! Matt, would it be possible to "revamp" our old articles with a new search intent intro - only the new intro? (say, using only the H1 - in bulk even???? one day?)
Nice update! Good work with the tool. Was the both example articles written with GPT 3.5 Turbo? Do you see big difference in the article quality between 3.5 Turbo and 4.0 Turbo? Thanks
would adding a personalized video to each blog post that reinforces your post featured content as in the message you are trying to convey to your audience,,would that help in your post not being viewed as spam?
How do you know if your site got hit by a Google penalty? Is it just de-indexed pages or is there another clue? My site is fairly new so barely any traffic but I did notice a dip in indexed pages recently.
Great stuff,but still need proofreading because the article on Northern New Jersey does state visiting the Battleship in Camden County, which is in the southern part of the state.
100%. Editing is always strongly recommended. Some will not, and that’s fine. But to make the site unique and that much better, and edit is strongly recommended.
I break up intros longer than 700 characters in length into two paragraphs. What's your opinion? I think having a single paragraph over 700 characters is too long. But not all intros are that long.
@@rankingtactics Testing it out this morning, the first intro paragraph seems to come out 500 - 700 words on the posts I've done today. Personally I think that's too long. I prefer a short intro sentence to t-up an answer paragraph. 500 - 700 is a block of text, so I'm going in and splitting those intros up into smaller chunks.
One of the things I hate about Zimmwriter is its inability to generate short paragraphs and make the content more engaging by using casual transition phrases and/or asking questions.
I am confused about pricing for using our own API can you please explain it in detail, for example, how much it costs to write a complete 2000-word article with different gpt models and I suggest adding an option to use different models in one article, like use gpt4 to write the outline and then using gpt 3.5 to write article text this way, it will be way cheaper
The cost is entirely dependent on the model you choose (since OpenAI charges differently for different models) and the settings in ZimmWriter you choose (since the settings result in more or less prompting with OpenAI). So there is no bright line rule. But an example, with no extra settings that take extra passes, a 2,000 word article with 1,792 words using GPT-3.5-Turbo-0125 cost $0.016 (so a penny and a half). The same article using GPT-4-Turbo cost $0.195 (so 19 pennies). I hope that helps.
@@rankingtactics I purchased on the promise of the MAC Version as well and yes the friction (PC VS Mac) is real. Personally, ZW is on the shelf until you get there as promised. Following along and waiting for the Day - otherwise this looks awesome.
I never made a promise. It was my goal and it’s still my goal. But my point was, if you can make money now with ZimmWriter then go buy a PC. It would be foolish not to. But if you can’t make money with ZimmWriter, then no version will help. Not to sound harsh, but it’s just the facts. I hope to fulfill your wish this year though.
I bought a mini Windows pc on Amazon for $125 and I use it as my content engine w/Zimmwriter. It's so small I mounted on the back of my 3rd monitor and its seamless.
Not only is this feature a great addition to the program, but your analysis of Google's interpretation of AI content is spot on. I think more people should be paying attention to your analysis.
This is another reason Zimmwriter is the standard by which all other AI writers are measured.
Love the search intent work you've done. Not a "pretty good freaking good job", but an awesome job moving the bar for AI content.
Congrats on the release, Job well done Matt :-) Gonna dive into the features for sure.
I use AI far more than Google now. Websites will tank. So glad I got out last June
"answer the user´s search intent" is just one piece of the puzzle, we need to also show signals to Google that we´re in fact an authority on that field. Otherwise, despite effectively answering/addressing the search intent, our content won´t rank. But, this is a GREAT feature to have!
Backlinks.
Absolutely love it man. Excellent work as always
Well done Matt - Love your tool :D
Thanks for all the great work you do, really appreciated!
Hi Matt I saw in the video you used mimic style, is that what drives the way the whole article is structured? Like starting with a quick answer then table of content ... or is that the default structure regardless of mimicking the style?
Mimic is just another prompt appended onto my list of prompts and applies anytime paragraphs are generated.
Hey saw your vid on zimmwriter for mac. Can i just use my android tablet?
Looks cool. I can still write for Bing at least heh. Also, be cool if the article linked out to the aquarium. Haven't been following as much as of late, maybe it can.
Great job Matt! Matt, would it be possible to "revamp" our old articles with a new search intent intro - only the new intro? (say, using only the H1 - in bulk even???? one day?)
Nice update! Good work with the tool.
Was the both example articles written with GPT 3.5 Turbo?
Do you see big difference in the article quality between 3.5 Turbo and 4.0 Turbo?
Thanks
I used 4 turbo. Mimic took out a lot the advanced language 4 is known for. I’d probably use 3.5 0125 though going forward.
I used to do the same with custom prompt, now it's in default 😊❤
Hi Matt -THX for Update - Great Feature - Could you please add in the "Google SERP Country" Greece ? Is there any plan to add it ??
would adding a personalized video to each blog post that reinforces your post featured content as in the message you are trying to convey to your audience,,would that help in your post not being viewed as spam?
Excellent stuff. I'm trying to keep up :) LOL!
A quiz, on Saturday, really sheesh
How do you know if your site got hit by a Google penalty? Is it just de-indexed pages or is there another clue? My site is fairly new so barely any traffic but I did notice a dip in indexed pages recently.
My sites are fine. But I’m also dripping out three articles a week.
Great stuff,but still need proofreading because the article on Northern New Jersey does state visiting the Battleship in Camden County, which is in the southern part of the state.
100%. Editing is always strongly recommended. Some will not, and that’s fine. But to make the site unique and that much better, and edit is strongly recommended.
Great update, but those intros need breaking up so they're not solid blocks of text.
I break up intros longer than 700 characters in length into two paragraphs. What's your opinion? I think having a single paragraph over 700 characters is too long. But not all intros are that long.
@@rankingtactics Testing it out this morning, the first intro paragraph seems to come out 500 - 700 words on the posts I've done today. Personally I think that's too long. I prefer a short intro sentence to t-up an answer paragraph.
500 - 700 is a block of text, so I'm going in and splitting those intros up into smaller chunks.
500 words is too long. I’m speaking of characters which is letters, spaces, punctuation, and numbers. Maybe you could PM some examples.
@@rankingtacticssorry I mistyped, I meant 500 - 700 characters, not words.
Congrats, could I have the your wallpaper?
Hi sir, Are you looking for professional UA-cam thumbnail designer and SEO expert?
Need content queue feature now even more 😢
One of the things I hate about Zimmwriter is its inability to generate short paragraphs and make the content more engaging by using casual transition phrases and/or asking questions.
Use a custom prompt for this as it will work wonders.
@@rankingtacticsI feel the same. Do you have any examples of custom prompts we could use for this?
Write paragraphs that are no more than x words… very simple.
I am confused about pricing for using our own API
can you please explain it in detail, for example, how much it costs to write a complete 2000-word article with different gpt models
and I suggest adding an option to use different models in one article, like use gpt4 to write the outline and then using gpt 3.5 to write article text
this way, it will be way cheaper
The cost is entirely dependent on the model you choose (since OpenAI charges differently for different models) and the settings in ZimmWriter you choose (since the settings result in more or less prompting with OpenAI). So there is no bright line rule. But an example, with no extra settings that take extra passes, a 2,000 word article with 1,792 words using GPT-3.5-Turbo-0125 cost $0.016 (so a penny and a half). The same article using GPT-4-Turbo cost $0.195 (so 19 pennies). I hope that helps.
Please just make a MAC version!!! Or a web version. Getting it to work on a Mac is very cumbersome.
Could ZimmWriter make you more money if you had a native version?
@@rankingtactics I purchased on the promise of the MAC Version as well and yes the friction (PC VS Mac) is real. Personally, ZW is on the shelf until you get there as promised. Following along and waiting for the Day - otherwise this looks awesome.
I never made a promise. It was my goal and it’s still my goal. But my point was, if you can make money now with ZimmWriter then go buy a PC. It would be foolish not to. But if you can’t make money with ZimmWriter, then no version will help. Not to sound harsh, but it’s just the facts. I hope to fulfill your wish this year though.
I bought a mini Windows pc on Amazon for $125 and I use it as my content engine w/Zimmwriter. It's so small I mounted on the back of my 3rd monitor and its seamless.
Parallels Desktop Business Edition✅
Please just make a MAC version!!! Or a web version. Getting it to work on a Mac is very cumbersome.
is AI?
I don't think guys should be using ai writers anymore.
Cool story