I will record "Aphex twin formula" or "everything they fear is you" in my brain so the doctors could listen to some music at the next check. Imagine their machine does analyze brain waves and just in case these waves would be converted to audio 💀
unironically, that is one of his only tracks that I have very salient memories of. The others being afk 237..., Windowlicker, and Come to Daddy... because of their videos.
Honestly, it sounds similar to heavily damaged phonographs. If we can restore them, it's only a matter of time before our thoughts can be reconstructed coherent enough.
It’s tech that will inevitably be refined. I don’t look forward to this. China would be the first to fund this probably and no matter how many people protest it, they’ll end up perfecting it
these aren't thoughts, these are the brain's reactions to the sounds as the person is hearing them. it's like taking a recording of the data going down the wire from a microphone to a computer, the brain is the computer that receives and then stores the information, the researchers are recording the process of the computer doing this. it's kind of like a capture card that streamers use to get video and audio of their console into their pc so they can stream it
That's presumably how the brain works - shelved pieces that can be slapped together to reform any shape, like Lego bricks. The same brick can show up in a car or a house
I would bet that's a small part but I think a large amount of the reconstruction is just mimicking the way our brains process noise because a lot of post-processing goes on with all stimulus, Jesus I sound like a pretentious cocksucker
Thankfully it's so far away still and most likely it won't ever work because there simply isn't enough data in the brainwaves to reconstruct the thought. These neural networks are probably trained on the exact sound clip and the brain waves associated with it over and over and then tasked with reconstruction and that's the only reason it even gets close to sounding somewhat reminiscent. Same with the "telepathic" controllers that read your brainwaves and communicate with computers. There just isn't enough data in those for any fidelity. That's why Neuralink is implanted inside the brain.
@@mariobatguy I mean, sure, given enough time to develop, but this just isn't promising. Tbh I see it like people working on developing teleportation, FTL travel or holograms projected in thin air, the technology is just not there and we have no idea which physical principles to even use.
@mrkiky I’m confident we’ll figure it out eventually, we literally have AI generated images, voices, music and art, and they seem pretty decent atm, give it a couple decades and it’ll be as accurate as it gets.
I sometimes dream songs that I never heard in real life but sound extremely beautiful, but every time I try to memorize it I will always forget it immediately when I wake up. This technology may help me to find those songs lost in dream I guess
I do something similar. Songs I haven't heard in a while sound so much better in my brain, and when I listen to them in real life it feels like something is missing.
What I think is happening: In most of these the subject is listening but is also having their own thoughts, which may interfer with the analysis depending on how profound it is. The rooster one is pretty clear because there is no background noise and is very strident, which focuses the brain into listening and focusing into it, eliminating backround processing and interferences
Things like Language ARE contextual, so the stimuli are likely causing the brain to 'fetch and compare' along side the usual audio processing. Probably why the reconstruction of the speaking parts sounds like someone 'put the tape in reverse'. Meanwhile, the music seems to invoke memory of music they either like, or what the instruments remind them of. I mean, that harpsichord almost sounded like it went METAL. The takeaway though, in my opinion, is that the reconstruction did get approximate tones right, even if everything else is a garbled mess. If the clarity of the rooster call is any indication, the most fundamental parts of the information, the frequencies, are easier to process and store. Which makes sense, as that would be a more primordial function. You'll recognize the tone and timbre of your parents' voices long before the rest of your audio processing catches up.
@@atigerclaw You have a good comment, especially the "fetch and compare" concept. Our brains don't actively pick up and record everything they sense in the first place, so it would be hard to create a reconstruction of a stimulus at all. Most of the time there are huge shortcuts being taken because much of the experience is already stored in long term memory. Then it's just a matter of recall to fill in the sensory blanks. This happens a ton with visual processing. I'd be interested to know whether brains of different ages (baby vs. older adult) interpret sounds and input differently, and I'd venture that they do.
this is exactly what i was wondering. If I could ever make music directly using my mind. Then this comes up in my recommended. This is really cool but probably also not the best to listen to at 3 am right before going to sleep after a long day lol
wow I can't wait for corporations to start imposing mind reading devices to their employees, in order to "increase productivity" and get "business intelligence telemetry", what a time to be alive.
i hear theres been trials for technology that records brain activity and determines whether it is focused and productive or not and they would only pay for that productive time recorded
0:45 is where serenity and the ability to recall singular memories gives way to confusions and horror. It's the beginning of an eventual process where all memories begin to become more fluid through entanglements, repetition and rupture
Post-Awareness Stage 4 is where serenity and the ability to recall singular memories gives way to confusions and horror. It's the beginning of an eventual process where all memories begin to become more fluid through entanglements, repetition and rupture.
I literally cannot thank you enough. I got entirely sidetracked with trying to figure this out for the past hour. My last Hail Mary was looking in the comments for someone like you who thought to share it. Thank you!
good to know I am literally not hearing the person in front of me when I do that "whatd you say" thing. It's because inside my head they are saying "Aajsiken gbbbh aspdkkg glurbo"
I have audio processing disorder and the first audio is pretty close to what voices can sound like to me if I'm not putting every brain cell into listening to someone
On top of my listening ability being worse than others for years due to headphones and since birth I guess, due to emotional trauma, I don’t always fully listen to someone talking to me especially when they start mentioning something I currently don’t wanna hear. My memory retention of what a person just told me about is also worse now after losing my friends. Edit: so yeah, it either sounds like what’s in the video, complete silence, or something coherent yet entirely incorrect
@@tonypatino1765no way, at least a few groups of nerds are in the process of getting a PhD from studying things related to this specifically right now for sure.
this is so fascinating. i ve been learning for a year about brain and perception but actually hearing these processes, and seeing the huge processing power of the brain is truly amazing
I wonder if this is really what the voice in our head sounds like. I wonder if we've gotten so used to it that its actually understandable for only us and not someone else.
I don’t think so. There’s probably tons of noise from multiple fragments of thought or the reality of these sensors being on, not in your head. That’s an interesting idea though.
not quite, there have been things that "read your thoughts" by having a very acute sensor next to your mouth/jaw. basically, a lot of someone's thoughts (or at least their main line of direct thinking) is sent to the mouth as a kind of speech pattern that doesn't lead to actual speech.... probably why some people sometimes accidentally slip up and say their thoughts out loud when they aren't speaking. but it does go to show that thoughts are in some kind of language, or are at least output as such
also, this isn't reading or interpreting thoughts, it is simply taking how the brain immediately reacts upon hearing an external stimuli and then trying to recreate (or "decode" it). it is effectively reading your brain as your brain gets the sound information from the ear, rather than when the brain tries to recall sounds. if anything, this kind of tech would be a fascinating way of making a kind of "human bug", transmitting or recording exactly what someone hears through their ears without need of any kind of microphone - because the human *is* the microphone
I really don't think so. I think it's because the method of extracting the data is so primitive. It's like if you had a camera and wanted to display what it saw, but the only output method you had was a black crayon attached to a robot arm. What the camera is seeing isn't black and white and poorly drawn by one robot arm. It's just a limitation of the tech.
Would be funny if ADHD, Autism, Schizophrenia, and other interesting disorders that cause a lot of mental background noise, music, voices, etc, corrupt this experiment and prevent proper mind reading
@@nerv4316that literally makes no sense whatsoever 💀 schizophrenia has a specific diagnosis criteria and a normal level of hallucinations and/or delusions is not in that. yes, everyone can experience those things and probably will in their lifetime but it has nothing to do with schizophrenia lol. you cant be “a little” schizophrenic you either are or arent
well, as an autistic person myself, im actually very good and fast at processing sound and i have a knack for remembering them accurately as well. better than most neurotypical people actually. so i wouldn’t be surprised if it was somehow clearer for some autistic people
Wish they had tested the baroque music stimulus on samples with differing levels of familiarity with that type of music. Would it then be shown that classical musicians allow for more accurate so called "reconstructions"?
I would like to see what happens if a man listens to the reconstructed audio, and then we reconstruct that audio again from brain activity. And then do it over again and again. Will it get increasingly distorted or what?
These sounds are spooky. You can sense they're all human voices, but are out of tone and are gibberish or an unknown language, as if the souls of the dead are speaking.
Not to me. It's just garbled sound. Like a corrupted file or a broken instrument. It coming from an attempt at interpreting brainwaves attaches no special meaning.
If you weren't already worried about that, you're late to the party. Start by trying to log off the internet more. What you say and do online is a reflection of your soul.
@@Fattts It seems like you don't quite understand the gravity of the situation. I'm well aware about online privacy, if that's what you're implying here. What this technology will bring however is an entirely different ballpark. It is literal mind-reading technology. For all the privacy intrusions we have with modern information technology, to this day there has been no tech capable of directly listening to what's actually going on in one's mind. At best we can make really good guesses based on what someone lets out (words, actions, etc.). Throughout human history, it has been an immutable truth that no one but you and whatever God you believe in could possibly know what exactly goes on inside your mind. The mind is the last bastion of true privacy. When this tech matures, we won't even have that.
@@smuggymcsmugface2142 I do understand the gravity of this. My point is, between this scanning technology and the advancing of artificial intelligence, it won't be long before large companies are able to recreate your psyche digitally. It all starts with data, be it scans of your brain or logs of your behavior.
I asking chat gpt for reading mind because latery when I was thinking about something, then next on youtube showed me video in this exact topic or ads. I think they can read min in 2 options 1. by radio waves + wifi + satelites 2. nano technology we eat with bad food then it read our min and transfer it through wifi and satelites. In both options wifi and radio waves is needed to send it to someone. The only one material what block radio waves is aluminium foil, silver and copper. and I found that other devices what can create special radio waves (anti radio waves) can destroy real radio waves - "old radio receivers that generate signals + integrated circuit with microprocessor + microcontroller = programmed to emit beta and gamma waves, this device should deactivate radio waves"
Why is it all so... musical? As if there's haunting, eerie gramophone music hiding in the background of all these thoughts. It's got that same vibe to it as modern internet horror, y'know, the backrooms, analogue horror, and all that.
Yknow... maybe that's why humans enjoy music? Have you ever paused and wonder why sounds can just stimulate your mind in such a way and change your emotions? Maybe this is a hint to the literal compatibility of music to the normal interplay of brain regions. That, or maybe the training data just had too much music haha 😅
One more video before bed! The video: Not only does this sound creepy, it is creepy. The results and the experiment itself gives “oh sweet, man made horrors beyond my comprehension” vibes
To people wondering, this isn't literally reading thoughts or like, holding a mic up to someone's brain. It isn't even a route of technology that leads anywhere close to that. It's just an AI that's trained on the music, then trained on brain data recorded from people listening to that same music, then tasked with replaying the music from just the brain data. This couldn't reconstruct an image in your head or a thought you have, it could only theoretically reconstruct sounds you're hearing as you're hearing them if you were hooked up to one of those brainwave reading sensor cap things. Like all AI it's just glorified brute-forcing and pattern recognition.
Aren't the two like, indistinguishable, though? If you play a sound in your head while hooked up to one of these things, it _would_ pick up on the sound you imagined, although the AI would be useless at deciphering what it was since it won't have a reference.
No one is afraid of AI playing brain-music. The problem is: If AI can play music through a scanner, can AI be trained to recreate mental images? Thoughts?
@@MentalidaddeDelfin The thing is, it can't. Images are even harder and contain far more information. And thoughts intertwine with all your senses, making it even more hard.
Last part is dumb. You can describe anything in a dismissive way. Including humans. We are just glorified meat computers with pattern recognition on steroids.
Jokes aside, the power of music In our brain Is incredible. Compared to other sounds stimuli, the reconstructed music was the closest to the original sound.
Imagine being hospitalized for suddenly thinking people can hear your thoughts, you're told you're delusional, then you see your then irrational fear is actually true.
Yes that is a very common delusion indeed. I think it is funny because given advanced enough technology it is possible. But this still required people to be inside an MRI scanner, and being recorded for 3 hours to gather enough training data. Not something that happens to you unnoticed.
@@kedrednael of course. Delusions are still less than reasonable. I mentioned fear that some stuff I see might be ai and they wrote doem "thinks ai is in his brain"
I wonder if there would be a difference how music sounds through the brain of the average person and the brain of a musician, or even someone with perfect pitch. Would it be clearer? More complicated?
it's almost as if the reconstruction is our brain attempting to simulate what it just heard, but it can't get it right, which is why we need to listen to music more than just once, it's never just perfectly in our heads ready to be replayed by our imaginations whenever we want
So this sort of suggests that if we interpreted sound fully, we would hear it very differently. What would it be like to do this with a musician? I know i hear way more than a normal person because i practice and produce music. I wonder if that affects the activity produced
Despite the actual sound not sounding too similar, I'm still fascinated at how similar the wave forms look on some of these. We're getting closer to reading minds than we think.
you know how everyone has intrusive thoughts that no one ever acts upon? ... you know how many people will ignore this fact in a court of law when thought surveillance starts being used as evidence that you were plotting to throw a baby off a building?
Every says this sounds creepy but this is prolly what it actually sounds like on a raw level and we just create a lot of guesswork and fill-in with our mind to do the rest.
В удивительное время мы живëм, научились "читать мысли". Это ж скольким людям можно помочь, готорые не могут говорить или находятся в параличе. Уникальная технология
I'm sure it varies from brain to brain. I'm sure there are some brains that would yield reconstructed output almost identical. Or perhaps even more intersting phenominon are possible. What if you heard music as a respinse but it sounded different, or you just heard internal screams.
this fascinating! always wondered haw our brains interpreted sounds wonder what the brains interpretation of sounds would sound like reconstructed in this manner, and then played back for the same brain to interpret again?
Perhaps the sound mystery has to do with fidelity of standard sounds. Human voices seem to be the best bet. Most voices sound different input compared to output but that could be due to how much of communication is nonverbal. Language in humans is very new and the amount of languages implies diversity. The average human exposed to the "english" wouldn't hear the audio as the input. There are very many unconscious events that humans talk about when describing "other human languages": how words sound like other words, pitch, tone and frequency of sounds and rhythm of speech. The prompt for the experiment is: recreate the vibration. That's what sound is. One thing I do think about is how "scientists" go about these experiments because the technology to record this is so new. It's the same criteria as the visual machine - recreate the ______. If I gave the same output as the test subject I would deem myself mentally unwell and "sick". The implication is that the mind is unable to recreate sound, vibration. Literally, if the person gets the output extremely wrong then it implies delusions. The "symphony" gets changed timbre and instead sounds like marimbas playing out of tune. The rooster would still be scary. I mean the "human" speech could have altered timbre in other outputs. It is a personal experiment, the person's thoughts are put on display and fidelity is tested
I feel like this is showing how our brains are big memory banks and every input we receive is compared to every input we had already received and is remembered, and the brain decides what our response is to the input by comparing it to past input. Everything gets quantized down and squished together until its big mess of recognition and emotive responses.
0:32 making a beat at 11 PM vs what it sounds like the next morning:
LMFAO
so real bro
chi pfp
@@hello-rq8kf Chi pfp indeed :D
I will record "Aphex twin formula" or "everything they fear is you" in my brain so the doctors could listen to some music at the next check. Imagine their machine does analyze brain waves and just in case these waves would be converted to audio 💀
My ears: hears classical music
My brains: aphex twin
ventolin:
unironically, that is one of his only tracks that I have very salient memories of. The others being afk 237..., Windowlicker, and Come to Daddy... because of their videos.
😭😭😭
EXACTLY
Tell me you haven't listened to much aphex twin without telling me you haven't listened to much aphex twin lol
Pirating songs is going next level
People are gonna have to copywrite their brains. 💀💀💀
@@jsmithy643 r/boneappletea
FR, I've had this idea for years, like remixing songs, making SiIvagunner rips, making your own music, it will be so easy when it happens.
Mozart was the first one with this method. Literally heard a song and then transcribed it from memory.
@@derp2397 People been doing it for years.
The reconstructions sound genuinely spooky, just unnerving as hell
So mangled. Truly they're so eery, like something trying and failing to be human
Unnerving hahahaha
@@ariannasv22 i mean it's true?
@@ariannasv22re-nerving 💯
@@concreteflavour woosh
Everywhere at the end of time has never sounded more realistic then ever
Never than ever?
thinking the same thing
Except these memories aren't burning, they're literally being peeled apart...
Original Classical Music: Seger Eliss - Heartaches.
Recontruction: The Caretaker - F4 Burning Despair Does Ache.
@@U-A-FTAUTTPTAYFGAATZNTTPTUTTDi dont think that's classical, it's from 20th century
Honestly, it sounds similar to heavily damaged phonographs. If we can restore them, it's only a matter of time before our thoughts can be reconstructed coherent enough.
It’s tech that will inevitably be refined. I don’t look forward to this. China would be the first to fund this probably and no matter how many people protest it, they’ll end up perfecting it
@@seb1520
Switch out the US and you'd be 100% correct
Welp, I'm gonna be paranoid as hell once this tech is refined and widespread
It's worth stating that the limited data they have is what it looks like when they hear the sound, not what they produce solely in their mind.
these aren't thoughts, these are the brain's reactions to the sounds as the person is hearing them.
it's like taking a recording of the data going down the wire from a microphone to a computer, the brain is the computer that receives and then stores the information, the researchers are recording the process of the computer doing this. it's kind of like a capture card that streamers use to get video and audio of their console into their pc so they can stream it
The sounds that it gets from reconstructing sounds like its taking multiple memories and stiching it together to make a sound
That's presumably how the brain works - shelved pieces that can be slapped together to reform any shape, like Lego bricks. The same brick can show up in a car or a house
@@quantumblauthor7300 me trying to member the quadratic formula instead constructing the formula for a circle
bad reference but eateot moment
@@quantumblauthor7300 autistic brains take this to the extreme and can't really understand things without understanding each individual brick as well
@@MattSuguisAsFondAsEverrr Precisely.
The classical music sample reconstructs into every genre except classical
Went from classical to THERE BE TREASURRRE
So thats how Hate It Or Love It got made then
Therefore, we know it's classical.
J. S. Bach Harpsichord concerto.. amazing band from GERMANY :horns: :horns: :flag_de:
probably bc none of the sampled people listen to classical
It sounds like the "reconstruction" is just some crude pattern matching that recalls sounds the system was trained with.
I would bet that's a small part but I think a large amount of the reconstruction is just mimicking the way our brains process noise because a lot of post-processing goes on with all stimulus, Jesus I sound like a pretentious cocksucker
For most of you, this may sound like utter gibberish, but really, the brain simply reconstructed it into German for our German audience.
Bro that was my first thought was “this sounds like german”
The Story I Made Up In My Head: 0:32
The Story When I Try To Explain It: 0:36
True💀
😂
😅
Laughing a little to hard at this, def can relate tho 😂
It’s me especially with venting, lol.
“Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimeters inside your skull” - “1984”
“LMAO” - “2024”
underrated
"Telescreens? Room 101? P A T H E T I C."
of course, the point of 1984 was that you didn't truly own your own thoughts either. that was controlled by INGSOC as well.
@@G8tr1522 Well no, not yet, newspeak was not done in at the time of the book
MY FKING SIDES🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Jokes aside, we are literally developing mind-reading technology and this is fucking terryfying.
Thankfully it's so far away still and most likely it won't ever work because there simply isn't enough data in the brainwaves to reconstruct the thought. These neural networks are probably trained on the exact sound clip and the brain waves associated with it over and over and then tasked with reconstruction and that's the only reason it even gets close to sounding somewhat reminiscent. Same with the "telepathic" controllers that read your brainwaves and communicate with computers. There just isn't enough data in those for any fidelity. That's why Neuralink is implanted inside the brain.
@@mrkiky theres a possibility for anything to succeed. we just gotta wait for what the future holds
@@mariobatguy I mean, sure, given enough time to develop, but this just isn't promising. Tbh I see it like people working on developing teleportation, FTL travel or holograms projected in thin air, the technology is just not there and we have no idea which physical principles to even use.
Don't care, I'm still going to give it an aneurysm
@mrkiky I’m confident we’ll figure it out eventually, we literally have AI generated images, voices, music and art, and they seem pretty decent atm, give it a couple decades and it’ll be as accurate as it gets.
0:37 best quality hold music i've ever heard
I sometimes dream songs that I never heard in real life but sound extremely beautiful, but every time I try to memorize it I will always forget it immediately when I wake up. This technology may help me to find those songs lost in dream I guess
Same, the instrument were pianos in my dreams and the music sounds heavenly
That’s how music came to the minds of the greatest musicians. Your mind is like your body, it has to be exercised.
I do something similar. Songs I haven't heard in a while sound so much better in my brain, and when I listen to them in real life it feels like something is missing.
i have made a song that is similar to the song I heard in my dreams months ago, but the sound texture aren't the same
Surely this technology won't be used for any immoral purposes that might be intrusive
EDIT: Guys, chill in the replies gaddam. I'm half joking
Bet
*I am extraordinarily dubious about that.*
clearly
This should be illegal.
@@lemau8458 nuh uh
What I think is happening: In most of these the subject is listening but is also having their own thoughts, which may interfer with the analysis depending on how profound it is. The rooster one is pretty clear because there is no background noise and is very strident, which focuses the brain into listening and focusing into it, eliminating backround processing and interferences
From my understanding, it's also reconstructed audio based on a recognition model so the model won't be fully accurate.
Memories, emotion, reaction but there could be some way everyone’s brain parses audio uniquely
I want to cry our brains are this inaccurate
Things like Language ARE contextual, so the stimuli are likely causing the brain to 'fetch and compare' along side the usual audio processing. Probably why the reconstruction of the speaking parts sounds like someone 'put the tape in reverse'.
Meanwhile, the music seems to invoke memory of music they either like, or what the instruments remind them of. I mean, that harpsichord almost sounded like it went METAL.
The takeaway though, in my opinion, is that the reconstruction did get approximate tones right, even if everything else is a garbled mess. If the clarity of the rooster call is any indication, the most fundamental parts of the information, the frequencies, are easier to process and store. Which makes sense, as that would be a more primordial function. You'll recognize the tone and timbre of your parents' voices long before the rest of your audio processing catches up.
@@atigerclaw You have a good comment, especially the "fetch and compare" concept. Our brains don't actively pick up and record everything they sense in the first place, so it would be hard to create a reconstruction of a stimulus at all. Most of the time there are huge shortcuts being taken because much of the experience is already stored in long term memory. Then it's just a matter of recall to fill in the sensory blanks. This happens a ton with visual processing. I'd be interested to know whether brains of different ages (baby vs. older adult) interpret sounds and input differently, and I'd venture that they do.
I am so glad that the reconstructed audio isnt going to keep me up at night.🎉🎉
Yeah literally like especially the fact it came from a human brain like
it will
such a funny comment, im dead
Very glad
Imagine hearing in it "I want your soul" and maybe seeing smth. like AphexTw1n's face in the spectrogram 😂
0:31 What the band teacher expects the band to sound like
0:36 What they actually sound like
0:52 The S3 rooster sounds are so funny, probably because it reminds me of a badly played recorder.
Nokia phone
That or the screams of the damned, can’t quite tell lol
0:37 music to my brain and ears
Gta 4 "mission pass" song recorder on nokia 3310
sound like some damn spongebob background music 😭
Better than DJ Khaled
Quite literally
@@mr.s4ndman TELL EM TO BRING OUT THE LOBSTER 🗣️🗣️
This technically means you can create the music that you imagine in your mind, just the way you imagined it.
yeah... that's how making music works
@@bestadd0they meant actually transcribing the music directly from your mind and nothing else, not even giving vocal instructions
it s stimulus receiving and then back into sound. Not made up thoughts and then into sound.
goated comment lmfao @sqyx93
this is exactly what i was wondering. If I could ever make music directly using my mind. Then this comes up in my recommended. This is really cool but probably also not the best to listen to at 3 am right before going to sleep after a long day lol
wow I can't wait for corporations to start imposing mind reading devices to their employees, in order to "increase productivity" and get "business intelligence telemetry", what a time to be alive.
i hear theres been trials for technology that records brain activity and determines whether it is focused and productive or not and they would only pay for that productive time recorded
You'll be safe then since they won't hear anything. 😂
?
It wouldn't just be corporate
you say "what a time to be alive" like it has already happened. are you so delusional that you think that because you said it that makes it so?
0:45 is where serenity and the ability to recall singular memories gives way to confusions and horror. It's the beginning of an eventual process where all memories begin to become more fluid through entanglements, repetition and rupture
she forgettin on my stage till my place in the world fades away🗣️💯
Post-Awareness Stage 4 is where serenity and the ability to recall singular memories gives way to confusions and horror. It's the beginning of an eventual process where all memories begin to become more fluid through entanglements, repetition and rupture.
@@Empty_blisses you got it
Lol, look at that, that's a caretakerhead
@@BanishedHand
kirby leyland
For those of you wondering, the classical music is J.S. Bach’s Concerto number 1 in D minor, BWV (Bach’s Works catalogue) 1052
Thank you
I literally cannot thank you enough. I got entirely sidetracked with trying to figure this out for the past hour. My last Hail Mary was looking in the comments for someone like you who thought to share it. Thank you!
we do not deserve heroes like you actually
thanks for the service
Thank You!
good to know I am literally not hearing the person in front of me when I do that "whatd you say" thing. It's because inside my head they are saying "Aajsiken gbbbh aspdkkg glurbo"
honestly sometimes i pretty much DO hear that
I have audio processing disorder and the first audio is pretty close to what voices can sound like to me if I'm not putting every brain cell into listening to someone
whenever im not actively listening that’s how talking sounds to me too. I recognise it as speech but can’t decipher it
I had similar issues in middle school because I almost didn't had any irl friends to talk with.
On top of my listening ability being worse than others for years due to headphones and since birth I guess, due to emotional trauma, I don’t always fully listen to someone talking to me especially when they start mentioning something I currently don’t wanna hear. My memory retention of what a person just told me about is also worse now after losing my friends.
Edit: so yeah, it either sounds like what’s in the video, complete silence, or something coherent yet entirely incorrect
When scientists reconstruct the noise in my brain: PENISPENISPENISPENISPENIS
I'M SUCTION CUP MAN
Nice pfp
@@dannydevito4184 thanks brother keep yourself safe 🙏
crazy world huh!
Gay?..
the implications of this are terrifying
There's no implications because this will never be thought of again
@@tonypatino1765 The CIA had this shit 40 years ago
We are literally studying our own brains, our own brains reacting to a video of a paper on reconstructing sound from the human brain.
@@tonypatino1765no way, at least a few groups of nerds are in the process of getting a PhD from studying things related to this specifically right now for sure.
Privacy will be gone for sure. But honestly privacy is already gone.
0:58 that one sound from uncanny mr incredible meme
this is so fascinating. i ve been learning for a year about brain and perception but actually hearing these processes, and seeing the huge processing power of the brain is truly amazing
0:37 nah it turned mozart into a rock band’s first rehearsal
That's Bach you pleb
that is bach not mozart
youre here again
Stop existing everywhere, it scares me
@@allroy_for_prezoh dear lord you’re here too
The problem with this, I think, is it's reconstructing brain activity from multiple things at once. The stimulus needs to be better isolated.
I wonder if this is really what the voice in our head sounds like. I wonder if we've gotten so used to it that its actually understandable for only us and not someone else.
I don’t think so. There’s probably tons of noise from multiple fragments of thought or the reality of these sensors being on, not in your head.
That’s an interesting idea though.
Penguins need HUGS
not quite, there have been things that "read your thoughts" by having a very acute sensor next to your mouth/jaw. basically, a lot of someone's thoughts (or at least their main line of direct thinking) is sent to the mouth as a kind of speech pattern that doesn't lead to actual speech.... probably why some people sometimes accidentally slip up and say their thoughts out loud when they aren't speaking.
but it does go to show that thoughts are in some kind of language, or are at least output as such
also, this isn't reading or interpreting thoughts, it is simply taking how the brain immediately reacts upon hearing an external stimuli and then trying to recreate (or "decode" it). it is effectively reading your brain as your brain gets the sound information from the ear, rather than when the brain tries to recall sounds.
if anything, this kind of tech would be a fascinating way of making a kind of "human bug", transmitting or recording exactly what someone hears through their ears without need of any kind of microphone - because the human *is* the microphone
I really don't think so. I think it's because the method of extracting the data is so primitive. It's like if you had a camera and wanted to display what it saw, but the only output method you had was a black crayon attached to a robot arm. What the camera is seeing isn't black and white and poorly drawn by one robot arm. It's just a limitation of the tech.
Ever thought of something random then immediately saw an ad for it on your device?
This kinda reminds me of that episode from Futurama when fry dreams of an ad and then it came true the next day
0:36 My sense of humor is definitely broken.
Literally same 😂
0:12
- "next time you have four gallon"
- "it's simply- it's simply beans and you st- stink"
This dude really needs to go easier on himself
Speaking German and French at the same time
I'm gonna shit myself laughing
LMAOOOOOOO
Reconstructed S5 (from the rooster sound) is really scary for some reason...
ALL his shit is scary.
No the classical music is funny af
It’s literally just Chinese music
It sounds like someone screaming
went from a rooster to a dog on fire running down the street 😂
1:09 is without description.
when the long decline is overrrrrrrrrr
@@beepbeepimasheep237beepbee3when a place in the world fades away
CIA aural torture methods
its a train departing, you can hear the acceleration. s-trains and subways sound similar here.
@@DieBlaueAgnes bro didnt understand the reference 😭
0:16 Simulation: What my wife tells me vs. what I actually hear
Do men even like women? Lmao
Well, I’m frightened. Anyway, when the brain went “sdguibhoygloGUCJJgfhkiGhib!” I felt that
Same
the last reconstructed audio of the woman and the reconstructed audio of the music were the clearest to me
Would be funny if ADHD, Autism, Schizophrenia, and other interesting disorders that cause a lot of mental background noise, music, voices, etc, corrupt this experiment and prevent proper mind reading
We all have a schizophrenia but a mild one.
I guess I’m safe for now then
No we don't, sentence like yours are a way to minimize the problems and pain it can cause @@nerv4316
@@nerv4316that literally makes no sense whatsoever 💀 schizophrenia has a specific diagnosis criteria and a normal level of hallucinations and/or delusions is not in that. yes, everyone can experience those things and probably will in their lifetime but it has nothing to do with schizophrenia lol. you cant be “a little” schizophrenic you either are or arent
well, as an autistic person myself, im actually very good and fast at processing sound and i have a knack for remembering them accurately as well. better than most neurotypical people actually. so i wouldn’t be surprised if it was somehow clearer for some autistic people
0:43 This is my brain when I just want to sleep
0:32 J.S.Bach - Keyboard Conerto in D Minor BWV 1052
The first movement is an absolute banger. Second is slow and third is energetic again.
0:36 Legit sounded like the seven seas by f-777 for a sec
REAL
Fr
Wish they had tested the baroque music stimulus on samples with differing levels of familiarity with that type of music. Would it then be shown that classical musicians allow for more accurate so called "reconstructions"?
I would like to see what happens if a man listens to the reconstructed audio, and then we reconstruct that audio again from brain activity. And then do it over again and again. Will it get increasingly distorted or what?
Seems kind of obvious, doesnt it?
I think it's distorted enough
Exactly 😂
like repeatedly google translating a sentence
@Waterbottlez_that's a good analogy lol
These would make banger horror game ambience sounds
I love how the person was listening to classical music and their brain turned it into funky jazz lmao
Not the brain but the neural network they are using to translate the brain waves.
@KamitaniLab thank you so much! I was struggling to find some truly unnerving sounds for my student horror film project, and these are beyond perfect.
0:32 the original vs. the cover
Original vs Karaoke version
Why did it turn a rooster crowing into the screams of the damned 💀
Low quality brain
Needs some grease
@@TheNuclearBolton my brain needs to add sum more quality
They would feel that way if they were trapped in my brain
These sounds are spooky. You can sense they're all human voices, but are out of tone and are gibberish or an unknown language, as if the souls of the dead are speaking.
It's the matter of time
Not to me. It's just garbled sound. Like a corrupted file or a broken instrument.
It coming from an attempt at interpreting brainwaves attaches no special meaning.
Huh that's conceptually cool but also fucking terrifying.
With the possibilities this technology opens up we need to make privacy of the mind a human right
If you weren't already worried about that, you're late to the party. Start by trying to log off the internet more. What you say and do online is a reflection of your soul.
@@Fattts
It seems like you don't quite understand the gravity of the situation. I'm well aware about online privacy, if that's what you're implying here.
What this technology will bring however is an entirely different ballpark. It is literal mind-reading technology. For all the privacy intrusions we have with modern information technology, to this day there has been no tech capable of directly listening to what's actually going on in one's mind. At best we can make really good guesses based on what someone lets out (words, actions, etc.). Throughout human history, it has been an immutable truth that no one but you and whatever God you believe in could possibly know what exactly goes on inside your mind. The mind is the last bastion of true privacy. When this tech matures, we won't even have that.
@@smuggymcsmugface2142 I do understand the gravity of this. My point is, between this scanning technology and the advancing of artificial intelligence, it won't be long before large companies are able to recreate your psyche digitally. It all starts with data, be it scans of your brain or logs of your behavior.
I asking chat gpt for reading mind because latery when I was thinking about something, then next on youtube showed me video in this exact topic or ads. I think they can read min in 2 options 1. by radio waves + wifi + satelites 2. nano technology we eat with bad food then it read our min and transfer it through wifi and satelites. In both options wifi and radio waves is needed to send it to someone. The only one material what block radio waves is aluminium foil, silver and copper. and I found that other devices what can create special radio waves (anti radio waves) can destroy real radio waves - "old radio receivers that generate signals + integrated circuit with microprocessor + microcontroller = programmed to emit beta and gamma waves, this device should deactivate radio waves"
I love how English turns into German
Return to its origins
German? As a german it sounds like an alien speaking a mix of russian and chinese
@NilsTbrx it's a joke, it just sounds slightly like a stereotypical german to someone who doesn't speak it
You mean the first one?
Not really, first one sounded like arabic, hebrew, russian, and icelandic all mixed together
They turned that classical music piece into the average Beatles avant garde track 💀
numba nine numba nine
Why is it all so... musical? As if there's haunting, eerie gramophone music hiding in the background of all these thoughts. It's got that same vibe to it as modern internet horror, y'know, the backrooms, analogue horror, and all that.
_The Caretaker_ moment
Yknow... maybe that's why humans enjoy music? Have you ever paused and wonder why sounds can just stimulate your mind in such a way and change your emotions? Maybe this is a hint to the literal compatibility of music to the normal interplay of brain regions.
That, or maybe the training data just had too much music haha 😅
people like music because it communicates emotions so well and we like patterns
“Modern internet horror” you mean entertainment for 8 year olds
One more video before bed!
The video:
Not only does this sound creepy, it is creepy.
The results and the experiment itself gives “oh sweet, man made horrors beyond my comprehension” vibes
We are living in the f**king twilight zone!
To people wondering, this isn't literally reading thoughts or like, holding a mic up to someone's brain. It isn't even a route of technology that leads anywhere close to that. It's just an AI that's trained on the music, then trained on brain data recorded from people listening to that same music, then tasked with replaying the music from just the brain data. This couldn't reconstruct an image in your head or a thought you have, it could only theoretically reconstruct sounds you're hearing as you're hearing them if you were hooked up to one of those brainwave reading sensor cap things. Like all AI it's just glorified brute-forcing and pattern recognition.
Aren't the two like, indistinguishable, though? If you play a sound in your head while hooked up to one of these things, it _would_ pick up on the sound you imagined, although the AI would be useless at deciphering what it was since it won't have a reference.
No one is afraid of AI playing brain-music. The problem is: If AI can play music through a scanner, can AI be trained to recreate mental images? Thoughts?
@@MentalidaddeDelfin
The thing is, it can't. Images are even harder and contain far more information. And thoughts intertwine with all your senses, making it even more hard.
They want tp use for court and criminals stuff lije that but i have not heard of it after yrs so it went back hidding same bunch 90s stuff.😅
Last part is dumb.
You can describe anything in a dismissive way. Including humans.
We are just glorified meat computers with pattern recognition on steroids.
Just enjoy the time you have on earth
What an incredibly vague and somewhat ominous comment…
Yo this person knows something o-O
And then ******* m*s*lf when this technology developes. I better go get a g*n before mind reading is an requirement to get one
This planet sucks, why would anyone enjoy their time here.
Wha-
1:18 screams of pain.mp3
0:53 these 3 count too cus holy hell 😨
stage 4 post-awareness confusions
Kek
@@SlapStyleAnims phrog
I understood this reference
NO WAY EVERYWHERE AT THE END OF TIME REFERENCE!?!?!??!?? 😱😱🧠💀
in a dream‼
Jokes aside, the power of music In our brain Is incredible. Compared to other sounds stimuli, the reconstructed music was the closest to the original sound.
Can you make the thing captures video from the brain, i always have this movie stuck on my dream
0:04 half life 2 beta type shi
0:08 scary ahh captcha
0:12 scary ahh captcha 2: electric boogaloo
0:20 ratman from portal 2?!
0:24 scary ahh captcha returns
0:28 gnarpy after seeing rule 34 of himself
0:36 hood lobotomy ahh sound effect
0:40 hood lobotomy 2
0:44 hood lobotomy 2: episode one
0:52 "top 6 scariest sounds heard on baby monitors"
0:57 the trollge is coming
1:00 oklahoman hell noises
the rest of them sound pretty... normal.
are you from reddit
They are from yandex
Ahh
your reddit gold sir
Decent amount of references there
0:41 did i just hear a distorted version of the 'frog laugh'
Yeah you did😂
And on 0:36 7 pirate seas
Being a late 1990s kid, I never thought I’d live to something like this.
They had the dream machine back than that you can see your dreams on a tv screen in real time but its not perfect it needs yrs of work.
Imagine being hospitalized for suddenly thinking people can hear your thoughts, you're told you're delusional, then you see your then irrational fear is actually true.
Yes that is a very common delusion indeed. I think it is funny because given advanced enough technology it is possible.
But this still required people to be inside an MRI scanner, and being recorded for 3 hours to gather enough training data. Not something that happens to you unnoticed.
@@kedrednael of course. Delusions are still less than reasonable. I mentioned fear that some stuff I see might be ai and they wrote doem "thinks ai is in his brain"
We got sound reconstruction from human brain activity before GTA 6
Lmao the reconstruction of classical music sounds like something you'd hear in Delhi or Bombay.
I wonder if there would be a difference how music sounds through the brain of the average person and the brain of a musician, or even someone with perfect pitch. Would it be clearer? More complicated?
But WHO'S brain? That's a vital question inside the experiment .
it's almost as if the reconstruction is our brain attempting to simulate what it just heard, but it can't get it right, which is why we need to listen to music more than just once, it's never just perfectly in our heads ready to be replayed by our imaginations whenever we want
The music sounds so clear in my head. Interesting that this is the actual result you get...
the other videos are equally scary, the image recognition reminds me of the early dall-e AI generator
How do you even do this.
0:36 u play the game with a expired tv and the music sound very different:
expired tv..?
So this sort of suggests that if we interpreted sound fully, we would hear it very differently. What would it be like to do this with a musician? I know i hear way more than a normal person because i practice and produce music. I wonder if that affects the activity produced
Despite the actual sound not sounding too similar, I'm still fascinated at how similar the wave forms look on some of these. We're getting closer to reading minds than we think.
I feel like in the future this will be viewed like we currently view wax cylinder recordings.
you know how everyone has intrusive thoughts that no one ever acts upon?
...
you know how many people will ignore this fact in a court of law when thought surveillance starts being used as evidence that you were plotting to throw a baby off a building?
0:35 what's music
Every says this sounds creepy but this is prolly what it actually sounds like on a raw level and we just create a lot of guesswork and fill-in with our mind to do the rest.
The rooster recreation legit sounds like a mutated bird from a horror game, it gives me chills
I KNEW my brain would play entire songs note for note in my head even when I didn’t summon it to
В удивительное время мы живëм, научились "читать мысли". Это ж скольким людям можно помочь, готорые не могут говорить или находятся в параличе. Уникальная технология
и сколько чуваков можно посадить только за то, что они думают не то, что выгодно Большому Брату...
I'm sure it varies from brain to brain. I'm sure there are some brains that would yield reconstructed output almost identical. Or perhaps even more intersting phenominon are possible. What if you heard music as a respinse but it sounded different, or you just heard internal screams.
How did S4 and S5 add clear heartbeats to rhe rooster crowing?
This is as incredible as it is frightening!
what is this and how does this work
Hell, and tech
I'd like to hear if someone who could recall anything perfectly took this test
so can we just slow down development on this or at least put it on hold or what
I second this
so can we just not fearmonger or at least calm down or what
@@olivercharles2930 ok
@@olivercharles2930 fixed
@@olivercharles2930 this is about as much fearmongering as the development of nuclear weapons was fearmongering
this fascinating! always wondered haw our brains interpreted sounds
wonder what the brains interpretation of sounds would sound like reconstructed in this manner, and then played back for the same brain to interpret again?
I have been missing nightmares, but now they will come back for sure, thanksss guysss
Yup- Pandora's Box has been opened.
Perhaps the sound mystery has to do with fidelity of standard sounds. Human voices seem to be the best bet. Most voices sound different input compared to output but that could be due to how much of communication is nonverbal. Language in humans is very new and the amount of languages implies diversity. The average human exposed to the "english" wouldn't hear the audio as the input. There are very many unconscious events that humans talk about when describing "other human languages": how words sound like other words, pitch, tone and frequency of sounds and rhythm of speech. The prompt for the experiment is: recreate the vibration. That's what sound is.
One thing I do think about is how "scientists" go about these experiments because the technology to record this is so new.
It's the same criteria as the visual machine - recreate the ______. If I gave the same output as the test subject I would deem myself mentally unwell and "sick". The implication is that the mind is unable to recreate sound, vibration.
Literally, if the person gets the output extremely wrong then it implies delusions. The "symphony" gets changed timbre and instead sounds like marimbas playing out of tune. The rooster would still be scary. I mean the "human" speech could have altered timbre in other outputs. It is a personal experiment, the person's thoughts are put on display and fidelity is tested
you take this way too seriously. Its a shitty reconstructions not how your thoughts actually sound
@@lanius1084you prove that the average human thinks that it can play music. Those things can't
@@IlliaBright what are "those things"
Literally nothing you said made any sort of sense. It's a bunch of empty unrelated words strung together.
@@lanius1084 I hope you go deaf and have to remember how things sound. You don't deserve to have technology because of your impotent intelligence.
Excellent…
I feel like this is showing how our brains are big memory banks and every input we receive is compared to every input we had already received and is remembered, and the brain decides what our response is to the input by comparing it to past input. Everything gets quantized down and squished together until its big mess of recognition and emotive responses.
Love how clear the natural sounds are in our brain.