What's so CRAZY about this - it just look like it's floating in space, but both ISS & Dragon are traveling at 17,500 miles per hour at the time of docking!!!
SexyWellness If both are moving at the same speed, then the speed is neutralized from the equation. What would really be impressive would be if dragon were stopped and the space station was moving at 17,500 miles per hour....and then they would have to shoot dragon into dock as the space station came wizzing by. I'd pay to see that once.👍
MARSHAL BAEK really? So two cars driving down the highway have their speed cancelled out? Try passing an object from one vehicle to another at 20 mph. You don’t grasp the difficulty in what was just achieved.
Ed S I was thinking the 2 cars going down the Hwy were traveling at the same speed side by side going in the same direction - you could veer slightly over and easily bump the other car side by side because you're both going the same direction at the same speed. Did I not word that with enough detail?
Born in 61 and remember as a young child sitting in front of t.v. watching all missions. Fascinating watching this that we can keep progressing in our space ventures. I congratulate elon musk and EVERYONE involved. You are ALL true pioneers .😊
Most of people continue ignoring space missions and universe exploration. Imagine if everybody would put their own effort in these objectives, mankind would be very technologically advanced
@@tyreemitchell5174 That's the point Mitchell. Don't you think if they were faking it they would remember to put the stars in? (You don't really think that they CAN'T fake stars, do you?) --- Put some minimal effort into researching 'photography exposure'. It's a really, really simple factual concept. All you have to do is look it up. --- you can reproduce it with your own cell phone. Go outside at night and look up and see the stars. Now stand next to any remotely lit object like this white Dragon capsule, and take a picture of yourself and see if there are any stars in YOUR picture. There won't be. The camera exposure is designed to pick up the subject in the foreground of the photograph. The subject in the foreground is well-lit enough that the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time. And when the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time, it's not open long enough to pick up dimly-lit things in the background, like the pinpricks of light that stars are. ---- Of course, that is for 'still' cameras. Video cameras like this one are designed to utilize the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground that it's recording. The video camera's automatic exposure is NOT set for recording the things in the background that are dim.
Bs. Still no stars in the background?! Just dark background! Whoever is recording the docking can not record the earth and space? BS ALWAYS. Elon you’re bs too now
Truly awesome to see. Been watching since lift off yesterday. Incredible achievement. Great to see the USA launching again from the Cape with their own Spacecraft. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
mike gallimore The main reason why they don't want to spend billions on solving world problems is because all the money is being spent on military/wars which only makes the problems worse.
Not only the docking is autonomous, but also all the mission is, which includes ascending, orbiting, first engine's landing procedure(reorienting, entry stuff, landing), "of course i still love you"s route, ect.
@@camtjies_9716 Yeah I took it for granted when I was young. I was a child during the Apollo program. And we could see every launch. FROM OUR HOUSE. I think because I was a child it never occurred to me that everybody couldn't see the launch from their house. And I mean everybody on the planet. -- In my twenties, during the shuttle program, I happen to live in the same town as NASA. And of course I could see the launches from my house then too. But I could also get in my car and drive 10 or 15 minutes and be REALLY close. ---- it was awesome. And I love the space program. And I'm more grateful, now that I'm older, of the childhood I was privileged to have. I didn't realize then how lucky I was.
@@kathleenr4047 Same for me I used to live in the North Pole, and every Christmas Eve I was watching Santa in his sleigh with his Dears Departing to go around the World and bring all those Gifts to the Children who Deserved it. Still so Gratefull for this Unique Privilege. I din't realized that children were sleeping when he was going around, and I was AWAKE to see him Leaving. Justice is not of this World.
You will be banned from UA-cam for that sexist comment. I’ll leave it for someone else to turn you in because they don’t pay enough for snitches, not yet. Do you think UA-cam hires XKGB agents to monitor Their platform?
@@creamwobbly There was nothing 'sexist', or even disparaging, about his comment. If you read it like a regular normal human being you will see that his comment is simply a description of the caution and care his wife takes while parking. Parking slowly, with patience and care is something many people do, so as not to scratch or dent their vehicle.
@mike gallimore You make an excellent point. 👍 I'm inspired to go bake a cake in your honor. ♥️♥️ ( I will though, be eating it without you, so that sucks for you.)
@@rafickilewis8185 I mean... They are on a orbit, basically they are falling without reaching the point, basically having an infinite fall, so ofc the speed is high
Imagine the calculations and the physical tools and machines required to make all of that happen. To be able to launch, find the space station, match speeds and then dock as if both bodies appear to be almost motionless. What a fantastic achievement.
Imagine setting up future space stations orbiting different planets in the future that you can transfer between. But idk if its possible to dock an interplanetary spacecraft on a station like that because it would probably be much larger.
Thanks for the video. I planned on watching the docking at the predicted time of 10:29am Eastern, but they docked about a dozen minutes early, so I missed it.
I always think of the flower waltz when I see docking. I dont know if its because of stanley kubrick or because the waltz fits so well in a weightlessness
Thanks for sharing. I had the opporunity to witness a rocket launch in 2018. Memorable experience. I uploaded a pretty solid clip of the experience on my channel.
Actually, there were no touch screens, hi-resolution monitors, microprocessors, large capacity memory, no graphic capability. Apollo used relays and switches, some integrated circuity, but sill in its infancy, along with the first suitcased sized computer on the planet, and it all worked just fine. Since then The miniaturization of transistors down to the nanometer has given current technology the ability to use those fancy touch screens and storage and processing capabilities.
There were several dockings and undockings in Apollo - once when the CSM had to turn around and dock with the LM and pull it out of the third stage, then when the LM left for the moon and then the upper stage of the LM separated from the landing stage and returned back from the moon to dock with the CSM. Then when the LM was ditched before departing the moon and finally when the command and service modules were explosively separated just before reentry.
@@HomebrandFishfood 👍 That is true, you CAN contact the International Space Station with a ham radio. But BE AWARE! IF you contact the ISS with a ham radio, it will STILL not leave a trail of light. --- just sayin'
Certainly not the first automated docking, but it sure was smooth and accurate. All of this automation opens the door to getting more real scientists to the space station and less test pilots.
What a bummer leaving this modern masterpiece and going into that old tin can masterpiece.... Now musk should launch a fleet of these that would interconnect and create a new cool Touchscreen enabled Sci-Fi style station!
Don't be too exicited by the new delicate touch screen and cosmetic touch of SpaceX. Space is a dangerous place to be and the rigged ISS works well for now.
@@alberthenriette8976 i think you meant to say rugged but got auto corrected to rigged? I'm not excited about the touch screen itself, more about the simplistic controls. Besides touch screens are pretty robust and i bet they have redundancy.
Imagine, the speed of them relative to each other looks so slow but relative to earth, the speed is heck fast. Technology really have gone so far. Just hundred years ago we don't even have efficient communication then now we're combining objects in the orbit.
Absolutely incredible, that being said... the Dragon had a nose/cone camera, would have been nice to watch from that head on angle as it connected with the ISS. Houston were tuned into that camera when Chris was organizing the hatch to be opened, he even waved into it. Curious why they wouldn't show that camera on the above video.
Soooo cool! Thanks for this. I worry about COVID... I would think that they have done everything to ensure that the Dragon capsule and 'em astronauts are COVID-free...
Kind of done all this 50 years ago oh and landed on the sodding moon and returned without any fatalities 5 times!!! This should have been a video of a docking to a MARS space station.
About 28000 km/h relative to earth. But in what way to you expet to see it here? You have absolute no reference in the background. So it could be also 28 km/h or 2800000000 km/h and would look the same.
Honest question. How come we can't see any stars? We can see them from earth at night but not here. Is it being washed out from all the light being reflected from the earth?
They're too faint in relation to the light reflected off the ISS/Dragon to be picked up. The camera adjusts it's sensitivity to light to ensure the object in focus is not too dim nor too bright and washed out. If the camera adjusted to capture the stars, the ISS/Dragon would just be bright white glaring objects in the image. Same reason that when you take a photo of a person in front of a sunset, you get a silhouette and no details of their face.
Dustin Murray --- Sam Horton is correct.--- They are not washed out because of the light reflected by the Earth. The stars are being washed out because the camera is designed for the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground. Which is the Dragon capsule. It's automatically set for the right exposure to film The Dragon capsule in the foreground and that exposure is not enough to pick up the dim stars, way in the background.
Weightlessness is achieved by flying G-FORCE ONE through a parabolic flight maneuver. Specially trained pilots fly these maneuvers between approximately 24,000 and 34,000 feet altitude. ... Next the plane is "pushed over" the top to begin the zero-gravity segment of the parabola
Just because you don't understand orbital mechanics, it doesn't mean it's fake. You honestly have no no clue how ignorant and idiotic y'all sound, do you? I was going to say, "child-like", but then I remembered that children have the capacity to assimilate new information and make logical sense of it; something you Flat Earthers seem to have somehow lost along the way. Tell me, was it blunt force trauma? Stroke? Oxygen deprivation, perhaps? Edit: Somehow managed to misspell 'something' as 'comething'. Fixed.
I assume you mean music. --- real space flight doesn't need background music. And the reason I know this is, there's a great shuttle launch video online where the guy added background music. And the most common complaint is that the music is annoying it distracts from the awesomeness of the video. And he even comments at one point and agrees that he's going take out the music and repost the video. ---. I'll send you a link if you're interested.
1. How does the crew Dragon know where the station is? 2. Who's filming? I kind of know answers to both of these questions but I'm not sure so that's why I'm asking
The dragon capsule is fully autonomous so its flight computers do everything from catching up to the station to the entire docking process, and they are using remotely operated cameras on the outside of the station
*Stupid Question* Does the capsule move both forward and sideways to match with the speed and rotation of the ISS while docking ? it all looks stationary in this video .
joeskis for someone like elon he should be proud for what he is doing because no matter if it’s been done before it’s still a step towards going further through space
@@TheGameCamer360 A rocket booster that is able to launch and land back safely to be re-used whilst delivering humans to space.... no its not been done before.
I don't understand, if someone could explain, if the ISS is orbiting the earth constantly, how come they can slowly move Dragon and manage to dock it to the ISS while it is oribiting???????
It only looks slow because bot objects are flying at relatively the same speed and there is no other object to give a reference for the speed. The ISS circles the earth every 90 minutes at 17,500 mph. If you notice the speed on dragon yesterday during its flight into space, it reached over 22,000 mph.
I think you are pulling our legs. No need to answer you, You already know the answer, playing a little bit of games, OK, got a little thrill down your leg by Chris Matthews now?
Caustic Chameleon and you want me believe they docked in that speed? If the spacecraft has 22000 mikes speed imagine how far up it would go within 15 minutes. I don't buy this CGI space show
How much light does your camera need to see by? Fancy cameras can adjust sensitivity by opening and closing the aperture that lets in the light. Human eyes do the same thing, automatically, all the time, by dilating and contracting their pupils. If you're a sighted person walking from a brightly lit to a dark outdoor area, you won't see stars in the sky either, at least not right away. As your eyes dial up their sensitivity by opening up your pupils, you slowly notice fainter and fainter stars. Most space cameras actually can't adjust their aperture in this way. Instead, scientists predict the light levels that a camera will encounter through its mission, and design their instruments to have an aperture that's an appropriate size for the range of targets they expect to encounter. This can be a challenge if your spacecraft will encounter a wide range of target brightnesses, but you make your camera to work on the intended science targets and don't worry if it isn't ideal for any fun extras you may photograph along the way. From a quick search...questions? Stop looking for fallacies. This is actually happening.
Can someone explain we can easily see plenty of stars from earth at night however pitch black for the Falcon 9 Dragon docking to Iss surely be some stars 400kms up. 🤔🤔
The focus and light exposure of the camera doesnt show the stars. You can try this yourself. Take a photo of a fully lit building during the night with the sky as a background. Result will only show the building with no stars.
-Cooper, What are you Doing?
-Docking.
This is no time for caution !
@@arisconstantinou no its necessary
On the way down I hope there’s no “need to shed weight I agreed 90%”
"The Rotation is 67-68 RPM!"
*intense theme plays*
What's so CRAZY about this - it just look like it's floating in space, but both ISS & Dragon are traveling at 17,500 miles per hour at the time of docking!!!
We all are traveling around the Sun at 60000mph+ and with the Sun around the galaxy center at 450000mph and with the Milky Way etc etc...
Yes but relative to each other they are fairly still.
SexyWellness If both are moving at the same speed, then the speed is neutralized from the equation. What would really be impressive would be if dragon were stopped and the space station was moving at 17,500 miles per hour....and then they would have to shoot dragon into dock as the space station came wizzing by. I'd pay to see that once.👍
MARSHAL BAEK really? So two cars driving down the highway have their speed cancelled out? Try passing an object from one vehicle to another at 20 mph. You don’t grasp the difficulty in what was just achieved.
Ed S I was thinking the 2 cars going down the Hwy were traveling at the same speed side by side going in the same direction - you could veer slightly over and easily bump the other car side by side because you're both going the same direction at the same speed. Did I not word that with enough detail?
I am so glad my sons and I were able to watch this launch yesterday and dock with iss today. Watching history unfold in front of our eyes.
Edward Hill cross our fingers that well be able to witness another moon landing in our lifetime like our parents.
pay your taxes
@@Puppy_PuppingtonThere’s the Artemis program! Moon landing in 2024
.1 meters per second? So you’re telling me my practice of docking kerbals at 15 M/S isn’t right? Oh man Jeb’s Gonna be pissed!
*cough* what did you say?
Its a game kerbals space program
So how many craft have you destroyed just by docking?
COME ON TARS
Lol
LOOOL!!!
@@kgosimookodithemechanicale2988 Laughing Out Out Out Loud
Interstellar black hole was crap.
Initiating spin😊😊😊
Born in 61 and remember as a young child sitting in front of t.v. watching all missions. Fascinating watching this that we can keep progressing in our space ventures. I congratulate elon musk and EVERYONE involved. You are ALL true pioneers .😊
This is one of bad influence produce by tv.brainwashing machine..
@@syamnakmuay89 and you, sitting in your bubble of ignorance?
@@syamnakmuay89 Stop drinking the bleach man.
Keep wishin kid. This is all computer magic
@Josh A They didn't
What an amazing view. A wonderful breakthrough in space transportation
Houston: Dragon what are you doing?
Dragon: Docking
I watched it with the song hahahahaa
At least they didn't have to initiate spin...
Like an old man easing in to a hot bath...
DabbaYabbaDo Disturbing...
Like an old man easing in to a young lady!
So So true!!!
Yeah like an old man slowly
Yup. The Left wrinkly ball always dips in first slowly.
Most of people continue ignoring space missions and universe exploration. Imagine if everybody would put their own effort in these objectives, mankind would be very technologically advanced
Stars?? Cant fake stars
Tyree Mitchell what?
@@tyreemitchell5174 I don't get it
@@tyreemitchell5174 That's the point Mitchell. Don't you think if they were faking it they would remember to put the stars in? (You don't really think that they CAN'T fake stars, do you?) --- Put some minimal effort into researching 'photography exposure'. It's a really, really simple factual concept. All you have to do is look it up. --- you can reproduce it with your own cell phone. Go outside at night and look up and see the stars. Now stand next to any remotely lit object like this white Dragon capsule, and take a picture of yourself and see if there are any stars in YOUR picture. There won't be. The camera exposure is designed to pick up the subject in the foreground of the photograph. The subject in the foreground is well-lit enough that the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time. And when the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time, it's not open long enough to pick up dimly-lit things in the background, like the pinpricks of light that stars are. ---- Of course, that is for 'still' cameras. Video cameras like this one are designed to utilize the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground that it's recording. The video camera's automatic exposure is NOT set for recording the things in the background that are dim.
Not morally though. Thats what we need
Amazing, what a delicate docking. So cool being able to watch this from outer space.
Not to be knit picky, but we're watching this from Earth...- agreed it's an incredible thing to see this happen.✌️
How come are you in the outer space and where do you have your Internet connection from?
Kacper Ogórek you make no sense.
Bs. Still no stars in the background?!
Just dark background!
Whoever is recording the docking can not record the earth and space? BS ALWAYS. Elon you’re bs too now
bcuz u What do you think is gained by faking this?
Did anyone have the Han Zimmer score to Interstellar playing in their head when they saw this?
No.
Here 🙌🔥🔥
haha - totally!
Me me me
Blue Danube waltz
i've been watching space flights since Gemini. We used to watch launches and recoveries on TV at school. Still a thrill. Way to go Space-X!!!!!
Wow !what a perfect docking Viva Dragon and Brilliant astronauts Godspeed.
Thank you Spacex
Truly awesome to see. Been watching since lift off yesterday. Incredible achievement. Great to see the USA launching again from the Cape with their own Spacecraft. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
South African?
Funny to see some adults still believing in Santa.
Great to see the human race achieve. Regardless of nationality!
From Australia 👍👍👍👍
What a stupid nationalistic comment. 🤮
Its not possible
No. Its necessary
Interstellar 😍
i played No Time For Caution in the background. start it basically right when this video starts, the timing is on point.
Lol dbagggggg
I wanted to comment that
Come on Tars!
And all this is happening at 17000 miles per hour!! amazing what humans can achieve!!
"Less than 1/10 of a meter per second" is not 17000 mph
Kyle Pace Hes talks about how both objects are orbiting the earth.
@@CheeseburgerFrags oh, dang
Listening to 'no time for caution' from the movie Interstellar while watching this. Makes it even more epic ;)
Well that was dramatic docking when the whole spacecraft is rotating at 67 rpm
Impressive technology!!!!!!!!!!!!! Great to see our space program alive again.
Where are the cgi stars?
mike gallimore The main reason why they don't want to spend billions on solving world problems is because all the money is being spent on military/wars which only makes the problems worse.
Impressive work from the programmers (mathematicians?) behind the autonomous docking system thrusters.
We are all in a Simulation....
@@abyteuser6297 lololo lololo igjorant
DRACO THRUST
All this innovative engineering Elon made possible blows my mind. It’s the coolest event I’ve seen in my 30 years of living.
Not only the docking is autonomous, but also all the mission is, which includes ascending, orbiting, first engine's landing procedure(reorienting, entry stuff, landing), "of course i still love you"s route, ect.
this stuff excites me
You should live in Florida! Where you can SEE IT GO UP!!!! 😀😀😀
( greetings from the West Coast of Florida)
Kathleen R XD oh what I would do to live in Florida . Give me a couple of years and I’ll get enough cash to leave South Africa
@@camtjies_9716 Yeah I took it for granted when I was young. I was a child during the Apollo program. And we could see every launch. FROM OUR HOUSE. I think because I was a child it never occurred to me that everybody couldn't see the launch from their house. And I mean everybody on the planet. -- In my twenties, during the shuttle program, I happen to live in the same town as NASA. And of course I could see the launches from my house then too. But I could also get in my car and drive 10 or 15 minutes and be REALLY close. ---- it was awesome. And I love the space program. And I'm more grateful, now that I'm older, of the childhood I was privileged to have. I didn't realize then how lucky I was.
@@kathleenr4047 Same for me I used to live in the North Pole, and every Christmas Eve I was watching Santa in his sleigh with his Dears Departing to go around the World and bring all those Gifts to the Children who Deserved it. Still so Gratefull for this Unique Privilege. I din't realized that children were sleeping when he was going around, and I was AWAKE to see him Leaving. Justice is not of this World.
@@camtjies_9716 just want to say good luck, many blessings for cash to come your way. Leaving SA isn’t easy.
That’s how long my misses takes to back into a car space
You will be banned from UA-cam for that sexist comment. I’ll leave it for someone else to turn you in because they don’t pay enough for snitches, not yet. Do you think UA-cam hires XKGB agents to monitor Their platform?
Come on Donald! Give Melania a break! She doesn’t get behind the wheel that often these days. ;)
@@steveperreira5850 I can't tell if your joking or not. Are you seriously offended by his joke?
@@creamwobbly There was nothing 'sexist', or even disparaging, about his comment. If you read it like a regular normal human being you will see that his comment is simply a description of the caution and care his wife takes while parking. Parking slowly, with patience and care is something many people do, so as not to scratch or dent their vehicle.
@mike gallimore You make an excellent point. 👍 I'm inspired to go bake a cake in your honor. ♥️♥️
( I will though, be eating it without you, so that sucks for you.)
Amazing to think both the crew dragon capsule and the ISS are travelling at 17500 mph
The make it like real, huh...
yeah, sure looks like it's moving 5 miles a second.... not.....
@@rafickilewis8185 I mean... They are on a orbit, basically they are falling without reaching the point, basically having an infinite fall, so ofc the speed is high
they can't be falling if there is no up or down in space. space is fake
Imagine the calculations and the physical tools and machines required to make all of that happen. To be able to launch, find the space station, match speeds and then dock as if both bodies appear to be almost motionless. What a fantastic achievement.
Hello
It is apparent that we are the same 250 people ON THIS PLANET THAT PAY ATTENTION to Exploration.
Thank you.
It kinda hurts, doesn’t it?
You've come a long way baby. Dad took me and my family to watch the first moon launch at cape Canaveral. Now this WOW.
I wish I had that chance: but I did watch the last Delta IV Medium launch so I can’t complain.
Totally amazing
Amazing stuff! 👍🚀
Loved it!!!!! 👍👍👍👍
i was on the edge of my seat, that rocket was going so fast!!!
Amazing
Imagens maravilhosas! Realmente muito emocionante! Parabéns à NASA E SPACE X! 😍😍😍😍
Imagine setting up future space stations orbiting different planets in the future that you can transfer between. But idk if its possible to dock an interplanetary spacecraft on a station like that because it would probably be much larger.
Mind blowing! Just like my Tesla driving autonomously!!
Thanks for the video. I planned on watching the docking at the predicted time of 10:29am Eastern, but they docked about a dozen minutes early, so I missed it.
I was planing on watching it but it was 2 am and I fell asleep watching the stream
loved it !!!
Great job 😙👍
I always think of the flower waltz when I see docking. I dont know if its because of stanley kubrick or because the waltz fits so well in a weightlessness
Obra perfeita, gostei de ver
Great work team endeavour
Thanks for sharing. I had the opporunity to witness a rocket launch in 2018. Memorable experience. I uploaded a pretty solid clip of the experience on my channel.
amazing
Cool!
love it
They finally cached up to 1960s technology !
Actually, there were no touch screens, hi-resolution monitors, microprocessors, large capacity memory, no graphic capability. Apollo used relays and switches, some integrated circuity, but sill in its infancy, along with the first suitcased sized computer on the planet, and it all worked just fine. Since then The miniaturization of transistors down to the nanometer has given current technology the ability to use those fancy touch screens and storage and processing capabilities.
@Prom _Ethium They did not need it !
Very amazing work!! Just a question. At the last few seconds of the video it shows about 7000 km/s. Should It be km/h ?
It says 7 km/s, not 7000. they use dots for decimal numbers and commas for thousands
the crazy thing is that they docked like this in the apollo missions, but manually, while hurtling twoards the moon. INSANE.
There were several dockings and undockings in Apollo - once when the CSM had to turn around and dock with the LM and pull it out of the third stage, then when the LM left for the moon and then the upper stage of the LM separated from the landing stage and returned back from the moon to dock with the CSM. Then when the LM was ditched before departing the moon and finally when the command and service modules were explosively separated just before reentry.
I've first hand seen the ISS with my naked eye - defo a humbling sight as it wizzes overhead, leaving a trail of light as it passes
If you had a ham radio you could contact it
@@HomebrandFishfood 👍 That is true, you CAN contact the International Space Station with a ham radio. But BE AWARE! IF you contact the ISS with a ham radio, it will STILL not leave a trail of light. --- just sayin'
EXCELENTE😍
Certainly not the first automated docking, but it sure was smooth and accurate. All of this automation opens the door to getting more real scientists to the space station and less test pilots.
I feel so bad for the people that believe this is fake. Their I.Q. is 20 and are so close minded. When we leave this rock leave them here
When are you leaving?
What a bummer leaving this modern masterpiece and going into that old tin can masterpiece....
Now musk should launch a fleet of these that would interconnect and create a new cool Touchscreen enabled Sci-Fi style station!
Don't be too exicited by the new delicate touch screen and cosmetic touch of SpaceX. Space is a dangerous place to be and the rigged ISS works well for now.
@@alberthenriette8976 i think you meant to say rugged but got auto corrected to rigged?
I'm not excited about the touch screen itself, more about the simplistic controls.
Besides touch screens are pretty robust and i bet they have redundancy.
I think the excitement of being in space overrules any need for a touch screen 😋
Imagine, the speed of them relative to each other looks so slow but relative to earth, the speed is heck fast. Technology really have gone so far. Just hundred years ago we don't even have efficient communication then now we're combining objects in the orbit.
So is this goodbye Soyuz/Baikonur?
Absolutely incredible, that being said... the Dragon had a nose/cone camera, would have been nice to watch from that head on angle as it connected with the ISS. Houston were tuned into that camera when Chris was organizing the hatch to be opened, he even waved into it. Curious why they wouldn't show that camera on the above video.
because it is all CGI
@@bretton_woods Proof?
Congratulations Bobby and Doug,,,, I believe,,this,,,,,really......(from Santo André- Sao Paulo- Brazil)
@monika laosi The only thing not actually occurring is your brain function.....
monika laosi You're the one who needs to wake up as you are still believing it's fake.
I NEED a version of this with Interstelar docking theme!
Play No Time for Caution in anothrr tab, right at the start of the video. Timing is on point
Joshua Lee shhhh don’t tell them!!! Let the mouseyyy finish the lab test on its own lmao.
I knew there was gonna be interstellar comments here 😂 it’s a good thing really 😂
Human brain evolving towards space living ! Congrats! To Nasa and ISS , soacex , usa bob and doug
My God.... It's full of stars...
Well yeah someone should have played NO TIME FOR CAUTION at the time of docking.......... Would be pretty sick !!
Cool
Soooo cool! Thanks for this.
I worry about COVID... I would think that they have done everything to ensure that the Dragon capsule and 'em astronauts are COVID-free...
They wouldn’t send ill astronauts to space.
They have to quarantine
Kind of done all this 50 years ago oh and landed on the sodding moon and returned without any fatalities 5 times!!! This should have been a video of a docking to a MARS space station.
'5 times'?
You sure about that?
Humans have been to the moon and back 9 times....
Unfortunately, politics happened
Outstanding 👍👏👏👏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 God bless America 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👏👏👏
Meanwhile riots
@@HappyGhetto It's always something. If it's not one thing it's another. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna.
Does anybody know what happens to the capsule once it's on there?
It will keep parked there until these two astronauts go back to earth in a few months in it.
I have a question, in the background, there should be stars right? Or at least some other form of lighting in the background?
Do you know much about camera exposure settings when shooting in bright light conditions?
Stupid question!
Thousands of times, literally this has been explained on UA-cam alone
This is the outset of the 21st century era of space journeys, congratulations Elon, u proved what a brilliant mind can do. 😍😍😊
Brilliant minds* he didn’t do this alone 😋
@@EllieDaisy Thank you for pointing it out. its correct. :)
just curious, how fast is Dragon and ISS moving in space, they almost look stationary
About 28000 km/h relative to earth. But in what way to you expet to see it here? You have absolute no reference in the background. So it could be also 28 km/h or 2800000000 km/h and would look the same.
Can someone tell where r the stars plzzzzzzzzzz
No, because this has been explained thousands of times on UA-cam alone. It’s called research
Honest question. How come we can't see any stars? We can see them from earth at night but not here. Is it being washed out from all the light being reflected from the earth?
They're too faint in relation to the light reflected off the ISS/Dragon to be picked up. The camera adjusts it's sensitivity to light to ensure the object in focus is not too dim nor too bright and washed out. If the camera adjusted to capture the stars, the ISS/Dragon would just be bright white glaring objects in the image. Same reason that when you take a photo of a person in front of a sunset, you get a silhouette and no details of their face.
Dustin Murray --- Sam Horton is correct.--- They are not washed out because of the light reflected by the Earth. The stars are being washed out because the camera is designed for the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground. Which is the Dragon capsule. It's automatically set for the right exposure to film The Dragon capsule in the foreground and that exposure is not enough to pick up the dim stars, way in the background.
凄い
Weightlessness is achieved by flying G-FORCE ONE through a parabolic flight maneuver. Specially trained pilots fly these maneuvers between approximately 24,000 and 34,000 feet altitude. ... Next the plane is "pushed over" the top to begin the zero-gravity segment of the parabola
Just because you don't understand orbital mechanics, it doesn't mean it's fake. You honestly have no no clue how ignorant and idiotic y'all sound, do you? I was going to say, "child-like", but then I remembered that children have the capacity to assimilate new information and make logical sense of it; something you Flat Earthers seem to have somehow lost along the way. Tell me, was it blunt force trauma? Stroke? Oxygen deprivation, perhaps? Edit: Somehow managed to misspell 'something' as 'comething'. Fixed.
They should make the docking of 2 ships in Stat Wars more realistic
Just a quick "Dock and Stop"!
Have you seen Any UFO's out there on your journey?
There were actually two on the launch video. You can find the time stamps in the comments.
Wow just like 2001 a Space Odyssey!?
Others: watches video
Me: Zooms to the comments
So there was only 3 on board space station before spacex arrived
WOW! That was cool. Did msm cover this great American accomplishment?
Yes. Yes they did. --- America says, "You're welcome."
The camera man can hold his breath for ages jeez
Mantap luee....coeghhht
Sounds like an X game competition
Tell me when this dogging complete
8:00pm state panjab (india)dekha gya31-05-20👌👌
seen it all be for with apollo and the moon landings, they had to do it manually
Me TOO!
Apollo had a flight computer which did most of the flying. Pilots could take over manually if needed, just like today.
@@Heat3YT2 is correct.
There is a moment, 💥💥💥💥
Can someone edit it with Interstellar movie BGM?
YES PLEASE
I assume you mean music. --- real space flight doesn't need background music. And the reason I know this is, there's a great shuttle launch video online where the guy added background music. And the most common complaint is that the music is annoying it distracts from the awesomeness of the video. And he even comments at one point and agrees that he's going take out the music and repost the video. ---. I'll send you a link if you're interested.
Christ them it gave the opportunity of to-go to the space
4:02 what are the shadows on the left corner ?
From the ISS
1. How does the crew Dragon know where the station is?
2. Who's filming?
I kind of know answers to both of these questions but I'm not sure so that's why I'm asking
1. I believe theyre being guided by ground control (?) And monitors inside the dragon.
2. ISS cameras were filming.
The dragon capsule is fully autonomous so its flight computers do everything from catching up to the station to the entire docking process, and they are using remotely operated cameras on the outside of the station
*Stupid Question*
Does the capsule move both forward and sideways to match with the speed and rotation of the ISS while docking ?
it all looks stationary in this video .
International Docking Adaptor...eye roll...align the doors.
such a crazy advancement for space! Thanks Elon very cool...
What do you mean? It's all been done before.
joeskis my thoughts exactly! Why is everyone getting so excited. What’s different
joeskis for someone like elon he should be proud for what he is doing because no matter if it’s been done before it’s still a step towards going further through space
@@TheGameCamer360 A rocket booster that is able to launch and land back safely to be re-used whilst delivering humans to space.... no its not been done before.
@@joeskis Reusable boosters that land themselves? No, not done before.
I don't understand, if someone could explain, if the ISS is orbiting the earth constantly, how come they can slowly move Dragon and manage to dock it to the ISS while it is oribiting???????
It only looks slow because bot objects are flying at relatively the same speed and there is no other object to give a reference for the speed. The ISS circles the earth every 90 minutes at 17,500 mph. If you notice the speed on dragon yesterday during its flight into space, it reached over 22,000 mph.
@@causticchameleon7861 Ohh thanks man! It all makes sense now :)
I think you are pulling our legs. No need to answer you, You already know the answer, playing a little bit of games, OK, got a little thrill down your leg by Chris Matthews now?
Caustic Chameleon and you want me believe they docked in that speed? If the spacecraft has 22000 mikes speed imagine how far up it would go within 15 minutes. I don't buy this CGI space show
morad barfab The fact that you don’t understand what’s going on doesn’t mean it’s fake.
Look at all the stars!!! 19 hrs going 17,000 mph right?
That's exactly right. Do you have any other questions?
How much light does your camera need to see by? Fancy cameras can adjust sensitivity by opening and closing the aperture that lets in the light. Human eyes do the same thing, automatically, all the time, by dilating and contracting their pupils. If you're a sighted person walking from a brightly lit to a dark outdoor area, you won't see stars in the sky either, at least not right away. As your eyes dial up their sensitivity by opening up your pupils, you slowly notice fainter and fainter stars.
Most space cameras actually can't adjust their aperture in this way. Instead, scientists predict the light levels that a camera will encounter through its mission, and design their instruments to have an aperture that's an appropriate size for the range of targets they expect to encounter. This can be a challenge if your spacecraft will encounter a wide range of target brightnesses, but you make your camera to work on the intended science targets and don't worry if it isn't ideal for any fun extras you may photograph along the way.
From a quick search...questions?
Stop looking for fallacies. This is actually happening.
bblw1307 Thanks for explaining it to them. Then need to learn.
wheres the mouse?
Good one! Where is the mouse? LOL! Excellent! 🤣🤣🤣
Can someone explain we can easily see plenty of stars from earth at night however pitch black for the Falcon 9 Dragon docking to Iss surely be some stars 400kms up. 🤔🤔
The focus and light exposure of the camera doesnt show the stars.
You can try this yourself. Take a photo of a fully lit building during the night with the sky as a background. Result will only show the building with no stars.
Why do so many people not know this?
Dr Mann i repeat donot attempt dock😅😅😅
anyone got amateur footage of this from the ground?