Kirchhoff's Laws - A-level Physics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 сер 2024
  • scienceshorts.net
    Please don't forget to leave a like if you found this helpful!
    ---------------------------------------
    00:00 Kirchhoff's 1st & 2nd laws
    02:11 2nd law worked example -
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I don't charge anyone to watch my videos, so please donate if you can to keep me going! bit.ly/scienceshortsdonate

КОМЕНТАРІ • 179

  • @mrpages6384
    @mrpages6384 2 роки тому +189

    How the hell is a 7 minute video more informative than 4 days of studying?

  • @cowbelly1540
    @cowbelly1540 3 роки тому +91

    sometimes i think why do i go into my a level lessons when i have this guy? im deaddd. But thank you so much, electricity is (was) so hard for me and my teacher didnt explain it well at all but now I can answer questions well and get full marks! Tyyyyy

    • @Drifterz
      @Drifterz 3 роки тому +3

      I feel your pain, honestly. So much better explained than in class

    • @beastdultragaming
      @beastdultragaming Рік тому +1

      I actually always think the same thing!! I learn way more with him! Pls come to The Latymer School in North London and be my teacher😢😂. Mine is awful compared to you…

  • @honeycog9328
    @honeycog9328 4 роки тому +238

    Actually I watched your first video on Kirchhoff (I refuse to pronounce it ‘keerkoff’) and it taught me a lot more than the multiple lessons at school. This video was great too though!

    • @ismailm7883
      @ismailm7883 4 роки тому +6

      If that aint fax

    • @teinili
      @teinili 2 роки тому +4

      Why would you pronounce it Keerkoff anyway ? :D He was german so it’s more like kirshoff or keershoff depending on your dialect.

    • @namename3130
      @namename3130 2 роки тому

      @@teinili ch is a harch c in german, sch is sh

  • @reemismail777
    @reemismail777 4 роки тому +60

    .You have explained it very well by covering all from simple to complex on electricity. This video was so helpful to turn my negative idea that electricity is difficult to positive.THANKS A LOT SIR.

  • @vincentroyce6666
    @vincentroyce6666 4 роки тому +20

    With a whole bunch of videos about kirchoff rules, the only video i understood to the deep. Thanks a lot

  • @angelo6082
    @angelo6082 4 роки тому +60

    Much better explanation than before, thank you.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +18

      The number of dislikes disagrees! 😥

    • @lfcforever
      @lfcforever 3 роки тому +6

      @@ScienceShorts 79 haters behind 79 failed attempts to make better video on this topic.

    • @mehiamawesome0609
      @mehiamawesome0609 2 роки тому +2

      @@ScienceShorts what do you mean, this video is perfect it literally has no dislikes, I can't see any

  • @luamyohannes8456
    @luamyohannes8456 3 роки тому +8

    This was so easy to understand. Thank you so much!

  • @beastdultragaming
    @beastdultragaming Рік тому +11

    Your videos are such a great refresher - they remind of what I’ve learnt and then teach me extra details that my teacher forgets

  • @usayededu614
    @usayededu614 2 роки тому +5

    I am going to give my CIE exam tomorrow pray all goes well.

  • @Lexyvil
    @Lexyvil 24 дні тому

    0:53 that is so relatable. I'm always stuck on every circuit when it comes to solving them :(
    I'm doing this course where we're learning Op-Amps which seems even harder.
    Thanks for the tutorial! I wish most professors I had and videos I found online were teaching the way you do! It's the right amount of detail with the right pacing I was looking for.

  • @Demi305
    @Demi305 Рік тому +1

    We can't thank you enough for all your help! Liked and Subscribed!

  • @Haunted.01
    @Haunted.01 3 дні тому +1

    my teacher took 80 mins, this dude here 7min.

  • @heroben1079
    @heroben1079 Рік тому

    You've explained better than all my teachers!

  • @ethanwrightson5586
    @ethanwrightson5586 3 роки тому +1

    Very helpful, thank you!

  • @jasmeetbasra6201
    @jasmeetbasra6201 4 роки тому +7

    So informative and very helpful especially for mocks tomorrow

  • @bobbyjeffsupremelordofcraz3532
    @bobbyjeffsupremelordofcraz3532 4 місяці тому

    This explanation has defnitely saved me one hell of a headache.

  • @shayanali7672
    @shayanali7672 4 роки тому +3

    Much more helpful than the previous video. Thanks a lot ♥️

  • @joebrooks1994
    @joebrooks1994 4 роки тому +4

    Another great video, please keep up the good work for the sake of me and my friends' a levels

  • @motivationformuslims1214
    @motivationformuslims1214 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the great explanation

  • @ZaidAkasha
    @ZaidAkasha 2 місяці тому

    Thank you very much you made this way simpler than my physics teacher tried to

  • @sankarpa3581
    @sankarpa3581 3 роки тому

    EXCELLENT MY DOUBT IS CLEARED

  • @cfrancisgaming8548
    @cfrancisgaming8548 2 роки тому

    Really helpful video Godspeed

  • @aqeelharoon251
    @aqeelharoon251 4 роки тому +9

    I understood the theory very well and the example also gave me a better understanding. can we have another video with more of these examples please.

  • @sparkyjackson7025
    @sparkyjackson7025 4 роки тому +9

    Always appreciated and great video! Could you manage to do a video on Viscosity (AS) if you can manage? Thanks a million!

  • @federicopinto9353
    @federicopinto9353 3 роки тому

    This channel is great

  • @clement_jacob
    @clement_jacob 2 роки тому +3

    from around 6:35 your statement is wrong , pd across that resistor would actually increase, still good video none the less

  • @humayunrashid8351
    @humayunrashid8351 4 роки тому

    Great video

  • @saharshanand2595
    @saharshanand2595 3 роки тому

    Amazing video

  • @kittyissu
    @kittyissu 3 роки тому +2

    What if we didn`t have the 10 ohm resistor? In one loop it would look like the voltage across the 30 ohm resistor is 10 V and in the other loop it would look like the voltage across the 30 ohm resistor is 12 V

  • @crystaljohns4163
    @crystaljohns4163 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much 😭

  • @jonathana9236
    @jonathana9236 Рік тому +1

    where can I see the calculation example where you add the extra 10 ohm resistor on the left side?
    I have a problem similar to that so I'd like to know how the calculation look like and how to get the power of both batteries.

  • @DapaChrons
    @DapaChrons 4 роки тому +7

    I'm still learning, but is it possible to say that the the capacitor and the resistor (both 10V) are also 10V, because for capacitors in parallel or resistors in parallel, the voltage stays the same? Or is that something we could not assume?

    • @libaanomer1812
      @libaanomer1812 6 місяців тому +1

      damn 3 years and still no response? my fault man wish i knew the answer to help u

    • @DapaChrons
      @DapaChrons 6 місяців тому

      @@libaanomer1812all good! I still don’t know 😂

  • @Issy035beats
    @Issy035beats 3 місяці тому

    Perfect video

  • @user-ok8zi8ur1p
    @user-ok8zi8ur1p Місяць тому

    Amazing thnks

  • @tufty1370
    @tufty1370 4 роки тому +39

    How many Sharpies do you have?!?!

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +44

      Like 20 different colours. £10 on ebay. Bargain.

    • @amnazar9348
      @amnazar9348 3 роки тому +1

      @@ScienceShorts i can smell the sharpies

  • @nagimka986
    @nagimka986 3 роки тому

    can you add the emfs to get the total voltage across the curcuit? 4:41

  • @vjamie2280
    @vjamie2280 2 роки тому

    This guy is the real goat

  • @petrahrabakova752
    @petrahrabakova752 3 роки тому +1

    Great video! Thank you ☺️

  • @Shreddies31
    @Shreddies31 Рік тому +1

    Hello, thank you! Also could you please explain why it doesn't work at 6:32?

  • @The_Green_Man_OAP
    @The_Green_Man_OAP 4 місяці тому +1

    7:05 At the end with the 3rd resistor I get this with a circuit simulator:
    V1= 571.43mV, V2= -9.43V, V3= -2.57V
    The original values were:
    V2= -10V , V3= -2V
    I was able to figure out the original values, but I am flummoxed at the moment with problem including the 3rd resistor...
    Here's my solution for the original problem:
    5:26
    /---------V₂-------------\
    i₁ -/- i₂ \
    ___→______a__←__▭________ ....\
    |--Vᐩ₁₀ | \ R₂ | \
    ⨪±10v i₃↓ -\- | ----\-Vᐩ₁₂
    |--V⁻₁₀ R₃ [] V₃=Vb-Va ⨪±12v
    | | -/- | -----V⁻₁₂
    |__←i'₁ ___b/______________/
    Vb=V⁻₁₂ - V⁻₁₀
    Have:
    i₁=i₃-i₂ (or later at 6:08 , i₁=V₁/R₁ with R₁=10Ω)
    i₂=V₂/R₂ with R₂=10Ω
    i₃=V₃/R₃ with R₃=30Ω
    Also:
    10v+ (V⁻₁₀ - Vb) + (Vb - Va) + (Va - Vᐩ₁₀)=0
    V₃=Vb - Va
    Must have i'₁=i₁ as 10v battery must have charge conserved, with incoming=outgoing.
    This means the wire voltage from Vᐩ₁₀ to point "a" is the same as from as "b" to V⁻₁₀,
    Therefore: (V⁻₁₀ - Vb) + (Va - Vᐩ₁₀)=0.
    => -10v = Vb - Va = V₃
    Similarly,
    12v+(V⁻₁₂ - Vb) + (Vb - Va) + (Va - Vᐩ₁₂)=0
    But here:
    Va - Vᐩ₁₂=V₂=V⁻₂-Vᐩ₂, V₃=Vb - Va= -10v
    Also, any bare wire has zero resistance & the potential is the same on either end, so V⁻₁₂=Vb.
    Therefore, this is:
    12v+ 0v -10v+V₂=0
    => -2v=V₂

  • @ahmadghaffar6758
    @ahmadghaffar6758 4 роки тому

    Can you go over electromagnetic induction

  • @jugganot101
    @jugganot101 4 роки тому +4

    I have a question: isn't it true that E (EMF) is equal to the voltage drop from loads outside the battery plus the voltage lost within the battery itself? How is it then that the EMF is equal to the p.d across just the outer loads in the circuit?

    • @alexukrasin8425
      @alexukrasin8425 4 роки тому +3

      there is an assumption that internal resistance is negligible.

    • @amadif1793
      @amadif1793 2 роки тому

      I have the exact same question

  • @margaretmarh
    @margaretmarh 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much .I'm preparing for end of term tests and my as in exam in January next year .
    I'm glad I came across your channel

  • @Felmich
    @Felmich Рік тому

    can someone explain why the total EMF for the loop in the final question is 2V

  • @exceptionallydistinctivedi481
    @exceptionallydistinctivedi481 4 роки тому +2

    Does the direction of the loop matter??

  • @madagascar8794
    @madagascar8794 5 місяців тому

    Does internal resistence not affect the second law?

  • @umumuntuksemua9831
    @umumuntuksemua9831 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much! Greetings from a freshman from Indonesia!!

  • @chloetang6694
    @chloetang6694 2 роки тому +4

    For Kirchoff's second law, what is a pd drop?

    • @ReddoX30
      @ReddoX30 2 роки тому +3

      Potential drop or voltage drop. From my understanding, it's the voltage that gets used by the passive elements from the voltage source.

  • @billy-cg1qq
    @billy-cg1qq 8 місяців тому +1

    Dude!! Now I want the solution to when you added a third resistance T_T I found the voltage drop on the new resistance you added zero T_T Why? What did I do wrong? Or am I right?

  • @humayunrashid8351
    @humayunrashid8351 4 роки тому +8

    Could you go over astrophysics in more detail please

    • @brendawilliams8062
      @brendawilliams8062 2 роки тому

      If this is astrophysics, then chain me to the wall cause I ain’t going no further. Lol

  • @SirFancyPantsMcee
    @SirFancyPantsMcee 4 роки тому

    Do you have a bunch of these as problems that can be solved? Do you know a place that makes them if you dont? Also, What is PD drop. I am super knew trying to figure this out.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +2

      An emf is a pd rise. Pd 'drop' merely describes the opposite. It's just a drop in potential.

    • @SirFancyPantsMcee
      @SirFancyPantsMcee 4 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts thank you so much for your video. I just got into this and your content was pretty easy to understand thank you for the clarification.

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 роки тому +1

      @@ScienceShorts Does p.d. stand for potential difference? Sorry, I've never seen that shorthand/abbreviation used before.

    • @daisy6392
      @daisy6392 3 роки тому

      @@epochseven4197 it does

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 2 роки тому

    Thx.

  • @raccoons_stole_my_account
    @raccoons_stole_my_account 7 місяців тому +1

    2:01 why does third one push in the opposite direction?

    • @The_Green_Man_OAP
      @The_Green_Man_OAP 4 місяці тому

      I believe he has something like
      this in the circuit shown:
      ⨪±
      ⨪±
      ∸∓

  • @xkl-physics7287
    @xkl-physics7287 4 роки тому +2

    6:17 looks like a fuse to me

  • @tylermcclenaghan7994
    @tylermcclenaghan7994 4 роки тому

    Quality video

  • @jacobb7379
    @jacobb7379 3 роки тому

    With the 2nd law, how can you call it a closed loop when there are other currents entering the system?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 роки тому +2

      Just means complete loop, no breaks.

    • @jacobb7379
      @jacobb7379 3 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts Oh right ok, thank you very much.

  • @relentz9011
    @relentz9011 3 роки тому

    Great video 👍

  • @maathalabdali3425
    @maathalabdali3425 3 роки тому +1

    Hi I really enjoy your videos can you do 2 more electricity videos one on mean drift velocity and one on electron Gun

  • @laurencereeves4990
    @laurencereeves4990 3 роки тому +1

    3:52 not explained why the right hand loop behaves differently to left

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 роки тому +1

      The right loop has two resistors so it's not straightforward to calculate their respective voltages. Therefore, solve for the middle resistor's voltage by analyzing the left loop first.

  • @user-id7kj7nl3e
    @user-id7kj7nl3e 3 роки тому

    so useful thank you!

  • @abd1x7
    @abd1x7 4 місяці тому

    How is there there the big blue current loop
    How is the current moving against the current direction on the left
    With the big loop

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 місяці тому

      The arrow drawn for the loop just shows the net direction of p.d., not the current (supposed to, anyway)

  • @fbdjwjflac
    @fbdjwjflac 3 роки тому +2

    6:48 Why can't you split the 10V emf 3:1?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 роки тому

      Because it's not the only emf involved!

  • @kanishkanicholas180
    @kanishkanicholas180 3 роки тому

    I got that....thanks mr....respect you!

  • @mattiapresti7295
    @mattiapresti7295 3 роки тому +1

    Do the word "Volt" take an "s" in english to describe its plural? On my every school book I always read that if a measurement unit is called after a scientist, its name doesn't change between singular and plural.
    1 meter and 20 meters exist because isn't existed a mr. Meter, but is an error saying 20 Watts, because Watt is the surname of the inventor of the steam engine. Volt comes from Volta, if a reader doesn't know, and Ampere its trivial. I'm curious because I always read a thing that is never respected by english native speakers acadamics

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 роки тому

      Interesting point. Yes, you're probably right, but it's something that is widely accepted.

  • @maxpayne5257
    @maxpayne5257 4 роки тому

    should the loop direction match the assumed current direction?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +3

      No - you don't know which way the currents are going, all you can do initially is assume. Then, if you end up with a negative current, you know you were wrong.

    • @maxpayne5257
      @maxpayne5257 4 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts Thanks for the answer much appreciated.

  • @MuhammadBilal-ns3tb
    @MuhammadBilal-ns3tb 2 роки тому

    Bravo!!!

  • @abdomuse9953
    @abdomuse9953 3 роки тому

    Why does the 30 ohm resistor only take the 10V cell into account, what about the 12V cell. Please reply this is really bothering me.

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 роки тому +1

      Because he analyzed the circuit by breaking down into loops. The example circuit he gave has three loops. One loop on the left, one loop on the right, and one big loop for the entire circuit. That's why you see him covering the right loop with his hand when calculating the voltage for the resistor in the middle.

  • @Ei5hipishi
    @Ei5hipishi 2 роки тому +1

    4:27 is it 2v because 10v + 2v = 12v ???

  • @generalaladeen9628
    @generalaladeen9628 3 роки тому

    Thanks mate!

  • @zakariadehache1235
    @zakariadehache1235 3 роки тому

    I love you Bro

  • @sakuranooka
    @sakuranooka 3 роки тому +2

    What is the "emf"? And what is a "p.d. drop"?

    • @waynewoolfe981
      @waynewoolfe981 Рік тому +1

      emf means electromotive force but I don't know what pd drop is.

    • @The_Green_Man_OAP
      @The_Green_Man_OAP 4 місяці тому

      Potential difference drop = voltage drop caused by components of the circuit doing work, which ends up being converted to heat.

  • @archieadcock7277
    @archieadcock7277 3 роки тому +1

    What sort of application could this sort of circuit have, in a building for example?

  • @maricrisfurton637
    @maricrisfurton637 3 роки тому +1

    how did you get the 2v?

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 роки тому

      Which 2v? For the 10 ohm resistor on top or the overall emf for the circuit?

  • @theastuteangler
    @theastuteangler 4 роки тому

    Can you what is meant by "p.d. drop"? I know you mean voltage drop, but what is p.d.?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому

      Same thing!

    • @kevinanderson6754
      @kevinanderson6754 3 роки тому

      P.d is potential difference which is the voltage

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 роки тому

      I wonder if it's a regional thing because I've never heard or seen "p.d. drop" when I was in school. I'm guessing in Britain they use p.d. drop and in the U.S. they use voltage drop (which I'm more familiar with).

  • @mohamedgasim8330
    @mohamedgasim8330 3 роки тому

    very good explanation do you provide a private tutorial?

  • @chukz_ldn108
    @chukz_ldn108 3 роки тому +1

    Where's the 3rd law?

  • @QasimAli-nv3pc
    @QasimAli-nv3pc Рік тому

    i still dont understand why ontop of the 10 ohms is 2 voltage how did you work that out

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  Рік тому +2

      12-10

    • @BqqqBbq
      @BqqqBbq 4 місяці тому

      @@ScienceShortsyou can't just take away voltage by resistance

  • @alihamas1841
    @alihamas1841 3 роки тому

    Can someone explain why it's I1+I2=I3 and not I1= I2 + I3

  • @rebelraime2524
    @rebelraime2524 4 роки тому +1

    I'm confused, aren't you meant to use simultaneous equations? That's what I learned from your last video on this topic.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +3

      If you wanted to solve the last example, you would need to - but that is beyond A-level. All it did was confuse people!

    • @rebelraime2524
      @rebelraime2524 4 роки тому +1

      @@ScienceShorts Wait hang on, it's beyond A Level? Haha I've gone and learned how to do all that now

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +3

      Doesn't hurt! 😂
      You might have to use simultaneous equations when it comes to forces, but you won't have to in this situation.

    • @rebelraime2524
      @rebelraime2524 4 роки тому +3

      @@ScienceShorts Oh well I didn't think simultaneous equations here were that hard, I found it useful. I guess I know how to calculate current for my own personal knowledge lol

  • @bellaswipe295
    @bellaswipe295 3 роки тому +1

    In my school they said its always easier to draw all the loops clockwise, to the same direction.

  • @zeroitedono2547
    @zeroitedono2547 3 роки тому

    don't you mean potential drops/potential difference?

  • @ahlamamr4659
    @ahlamamr4659 2 роки тому

    why did he ignore the 10 ohm?

  • @khizarhassan4152
    @khizarhassan4152 2 роки тому

    Rad video brav

  • @devluhar6902
    @devluhar6902 3 роки тому

    could you tell me where you got that final worked example question from?

  • @abubakrahmed7909
    @abubakrahmed7909 4 роки тому +1

    what are p.d drops ?

  • @rachaelkenyon4712
    @rachaelkenyon4712 2 місяці тому

    Legend

  • @steveclarencesimo61
    @steveclarencesimo61 3 місяці тому

    Why have you taken different directions in boths loops

    • @boakyeo-a2455
      @boakyeo-a2455 Місяць тому

      Current flows from positive terminal

  • @shyamkanjee6409
    @shyamkanjee6409 3 роки тому

    Holy, I'm glad this isn't in my spec (AQA)

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 роки тому +6

      It is, dude.

    • @shyamkanjee6409
      @shyamkanjee6409 3 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts Oh dear, throughout the electricity specification, AQA does not mention Kirchhoff at all. However, I did find a little section on the AQA book that looks into Kirchhoff's laws.

    • @shyamkanjee6409
      @shyamkanjee6409 3 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts,You're right, they don't mention Kirchhoff, but they expect you to just apply his principles

  • @myrie1
    @myrie1 3 роки тому

    Came here to verify if my vocabulary is enough to learn physics in english, and...no, it is not, I'm already bad at Py on my own language

  • @zohaibgulawan9070
    @zohaibgulawan9070 2 роки тому +1

    The real question is how you actually do the last question?🤔🤔

    • @The_Green_Man_OAP
      @The_Green_Man_OAP 4 місяці тому

      I cheated and used a simulation!
      (Answers above)

  • @geezer1024
    @geezer1024 6 місяців тому

    science shorts is the messiah

  • @dineshkurimilla6217
    @dineshkurimilla6217 2 роки тому

    i really love you sm xoxoxoxoxoox

  • @amadif1793
    @amadif1793 2 роки тому

    I have a test in less than an hour wish me luck boys

  • @hamzag9833
    @hamzag9833 4 роки тому +3

    Again, I don't know why am here
    Still doing GCSE's

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +3

      You still use the ideas at GCSE, you just don't know the definitions 😊
      You know that for a potential divider circuit, all the emf must be 'used up' by the two resistors, so it's shared between them according to their resistances.

    • @hamzag9833
      @hamzag9833 4 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts k thanks

    • @ubaidshah1910
      @ubaidshah1910 4 роки тому +1

      hamzy g basically all the stuff youve been taught about parallel branches having an equal potential drop is actually just a specific case of kirchoff's voltage law. i think knowing this at gcse would have helped me understand circuit analysis better tbh

    • @hamzag9833
      @hamzag9833 4 роки тому

      @@ubaidshah1910 thanks mate

  • @hamaadsiddiqui5480
    @hamaadsiddiqui5480 3 роки тому

    5:18 You said Ohm's instead of Ampere's

  • @tgribmx5454
    @tgribmx5454 Рік тому

    👍

  • @JordanIzay
    @JordanIzay 4 роки тому +2

    You confusing me .. i didnt get anything

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +1

      Where did I lose you?

    • @JordanIzay
      @JordanIzay 4 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts 3:44 forward ..
      You said the direction of the current will be given in any question but in trying to solve a question now with no direction of current flow ..
      And how did you get that 9 and 3 taking the right loop *time of video 3:46 ....
      Got exams tomorrow cant get it at all

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +1

      If you are not told, then you can assume the directions, and create an equation using Kirchhoff's 1st law (I1=I2+I3 for example). It doesn't matter in the end, because if you got the direction wrong, you'll just end up with a negative value, which just shows that it's going in the opposite direction to what you assumed.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +1

      The second bit: have you seen my potential divider video? If the right loop was an isolated circuit, the total p.d. (12V) would be shared across both resistors relative to the resistances. The ratio of their resistances is 3:1, so the 12V would be shared 3:1 too - that's 9V to 3V.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +3

      If you're not getting how the 12V is being split up, it's honestly a bit late to be wrapping your head round problems like this mate - just saying.

  • @ammarjaber7238
    @ammarjaber7238 4 роки тому

    its I1=I2+I3

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 роки тому +5

      So you're saying I'm wrong?

    • @ammarjaber7238
      @ammarjaber7238 4 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts sir i said if write or ur equation is write because in my book says what I told u

    • @Hamza-ef3uk
      @Hamza-ef3uk 4 роки тому

      @@ammarjaber7238 im confused, im p sure whatever you put it should be right

    • @ramaraonagireddi567
      @ramaraonagireddi567 4 роки тому

      @@ScienceShorts no sir you are never wrong

  • @lynsmith3154
    @lynsmith3154 2 роки тому

    Can you please talk slower and have pauses to allow us to digest the new information. Beginners like me are a bit confused to start with. There is no need to rush through.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  2 роки тому +4

      So you want *me* to pause, when there's a perfectly good pause button? 🤔

    • @The_Green_Man_OAP
      @The_Green_Man_OAP 4 місяці тому

      ​@@ScienceShortsI can slow it down in my yt app. Can't they all do that?

  • @dinomoviesnstuff
    @dinomoviesnstuff 2 роки тому

    Falsch eig aber egal...