AK47 VS. AR15 - SPEED SHOOT

[@goodmantruth8185]

In Hungary we shot with AR under under 18 years of age. Once we become a man we get a Ak for birthday.

[@user-pr3fd9zh1x]

ㅈ

[@vulcanrider2446]

What if you become a woman?

[@enriquebarrera4037]

5xNFLMVP PeytonManning never

[@Tikii_9]

@@enriquebarrera4037 AK is garbage.

[@enriquebarrera4037]

Cccc_los yea sure

[@Touhid]

In a zombie apocalypse you need three things, Nokia 3310+ A Toyota +AK47 ( Russian made)

[@Zadjelly]

Fax

[@guillermoespinoza9548]

El mejor fusil ak47 de asalto soviético en Vietnam fue el mejor y mortal

[@getemkell]

Dat part

[@AntiFakeJewsRev2-9-0Zach9-6]

😁

[@paudiebennett826]

This test isn't accurate, he clearly favors the AR-15. He clearly slowed down for the AK

[@cuaysborja1000]

Amen... He clearly favors the AR and he slows down intentionally on the AK.

[@mahdavimail]

He thinks by saying America repeatedly makes ar-15 a better gun lol

[@AK-47ISTHEWAY]

@morbidlu obese Nope

[@PenguinNoodleSoup]

@@Winner85274it’s really personal preferences they have pros and cons

[@roccosavedra9650]

I noticed that

[@sicosidd2350]

You definitely slowed down for the ak

[@somalistars1320]

I agree

[@kannan-sar1758]

Recoil

[@WackRusDud]

@@kannan-sar1758 The recoil is not THAT significant. (The difference would be 3 seconds max)

[@rawdog314]

No two ways about it

[@vulcanrider2446]

@@WackRusDud You should try and see.

[@charly4323]

The ak is much better, but u dont know how to shoot, a woman or a child could use an AR but only a real man can use an AK correctly

[@Bradgilliswhammyman]

+Goat Man you are being silly. Each weapon is great and very dependable. They will stop a target equally.

[@nightelf494]

+Goat Man and you're saying that because what? you have played so much cs:go? h1z1? grow up kid.

[@abualfathelali8233]

agree

[@Finn-li8hz]

I'm aure

[@Unmedicated_Moments]

ISIS uses AKs and NONE of them are real men

[@user-on9kz7pf2e]

АК47 должен быть русской сборки тогда он будет надежен, если другие страны собирали то качество сомнительное. и не забывайте что АК47 был разработан в 1947 году. и был лучшим. сейчас на вооружении российской армии стоит АК74м, улучшенная версия ак 47 в 1974 году. ну а теперь вышел новый автомат Калашникова АК12 разработанный в 2012 году. у него меньшая отдача и выше точность при той же мощи. так что м16 нервно курит в сторонке)))

[@user-gv4ch6bv4h]

Полностью поддерживаю! Настоящий АК только русский АКЮ а остальные сборки - гадость. И для сравнения можно было взять или, как ты сказал, АК074м или АК-103 (У него калибр 7.62).

[@michaelshitov9161]

М16 может и нервно курит в сторонке, а вот HK 416 смотрит на все АК как на гавно.

[@zerg5206]

Хуле вы несёте? АК 12 - говно без задач, которое ещё хрен знает примут ли на вооружение. АК47 это если что ранний прототип, который в серию так и не пошёл, на вооружение приняли АКМ под тот же патрон. Откуда у здешних диванных вояк данные о ттх АК 12 мне вообще не ведомо. Короче, сравнение AR системы с калашоидами - дело пустое, особенно когда сравнивают люди, ничего тяжелее члена в руках не державшие.

[@michaelshitov9161]

Zerg сказал как отрезал.

[@user-on9kz7pf2e]

Zerg я стрелял с ак 74м и могу его разобрать. а ты то держал его в руках? или только в БФ4 играл?

[@astrofrk]

The AR 15 is a good gun as is the AK47. The AR 15 is harder to properly clean and the AK 47 can be fired through the mud and is easier to clean. The AR 15 is somewhat more accurate. In a SHTF situation, I would still take the AK 47.

[@ChristheCEO1]

but ar15 is lighter

[@gavinization2225]

exactly ar15's are for wimpy men

[@aurasushii3676]

Ak 47 failed in mud test ar passed a mud test...your comment is bullshit

[@user-ck5zx6yo7u]

Your comment is bullshit ak is better then ar specially when it's made in RUSSIA. I am Russian, so stop writing bullshit. and it passed all tests including the mud.

[@xolo2282]

MANIAK. CHALLENGER and more accurate 😏"

[@jrc99us]

Just make sure you don't get a speck of dirt in your AR.

[@amzarmimieamzar698]

Why

[@bobbyraejohnson]

Haha that's funny considering it's the opposite

[@vulcanrider2446]

This AR15 mud test was performed right after last week's AK47 test: the same exact mud, the same wheelbarrow, at the same location, a mere 10 minutes later.
ua-cam.com/video/YAneTFiz5WU/v-deo.html
AK47 Mud Test
ua-cam.com/video/DX73uXs3xGU/v-deo.html

[@vulcanrider2446]

AR vs AK mud test
ua-cam.com/video/9APzYqwXckw/v-deo.html
“Practical” AK Mud Test
ua-cam.com/video/htkYVB4LaDM/v-deo.html

[@wynwilliams6977]

To be fair the shooter was obviously more hesitant and less experienced with the AK

[@washedupsand1019]

yeah

[@wynwilliams6977]

***** well, the design on the two is very very different, the AR15 will always have less recoil (not because of the round) andthe AK is very inaccurate and hard to control on auto, more so the the AR15 due to that big fucking hunk of metal flying back and forth, easy to shoot and maintain and great in fucked up conditions - between the two I would go with the AR15 .308 in a hostile situation purely because of accuracy, single shot however if you are not in a hurry no real diffrence

[@willamestrada1121]

agreed

[@MrMartinio]

Also, tbh, comparing two different types of ammo, (dunno if the AR uses .223 or 5.56) compared to 7.62x39 is completely useless

[@themanwithnoname1381]

lesd experienced with the AK??? have you seen this guys AK videos? hes incredible

[@Harikusa]

Why then your special forces leave your gun on a sholder and use AK? AK shoots after being drowned, after a sand storm, in arctica and in heat of a desert, in heavy rain and after being crushed by heave vehicle and still nicely performs. M 16 or any such rifle like one you using is good only till certain extent, it's simply not reliable as AK. Just stop comparing AK with your guns, it's pittyful.

[@zxtmasmith9883]

Yes but it is far less accurate than the AR 15, especially after those tests.

[@Harikusa]

kevin kadisak It's ok as long as you believe in it.

[@mikec8086]

+Harikusa The standard soviet block Ak47 is accurate ( for suppressing/ hits on a mans body be it limbs or torso) up to 200-maybe 300 if the rifle is made very well. The 7.62x39mm cartridge is powerful however the ballistics are pretty bad at range, plus the ak47's sight system leaves something to be desired. Modern M16's and Ak74's's are about equal in terms of reliability (Ak is a bit more) and power. With the m16 taking the lead in accuracy at range. SF uses the ak47 because frankly they operate in enemy territory so they need to blend in or get ammo as they can't be easily resupplied.

[@capcom7794]

+Harikusa Sand jams the ak

[@wadopotato33]

+Harikusa There have been studies. The Ar jams about 2 rounds per thousand. The Ak-47 jams 1 time per thousand. There isn't that much difference in reliability. As far as the weapon goes the Ar-15 has a lot of advantages. Including (because it fires a smaller round and has better made barrels) 50,000 rounds before rebuild time compared to 6,000 to 8,000 rounds for an AK. Believe it or not the Ar-15 will last more rounds/longer... that is also reliability.

[@aajjaayyuk]

Hey dude, what about Vietnam war? 😂
When USA soldiers asked for AKs. 😂

[@enriquebarrera4037]

Ajay Singh Chauhan yes because the Ak never fail is most reliable than AR-15

[@vikaskaswan4817]

yeah 😂😂😂 after that US ordered AK .. and 500 dollars AK vs 1500 dollars AR lol ..still AK rocking

[@shindur]

It's obvious, he was delaying shots on AK 47

[@vulcanrider2446]

The AK47 is inherently inaccurate and inherently slow.
Short stubby bullets are not very aerodynamic and not very accurate.
5.56x45 is sleek and aerodynamic with a higher velocity. It is inherently more accurate.
The AK47's much larger bullet and high recoil means it takes longer to reposition for another shot.

[@yuniki5237]

AK47 was developed 10 years before AR. And AK is the most famous commonly used gun in the history

[@tmitchellw1000]

Your right. The AK was developed in 1947, but didn't actually see deployment until 1949. Only two years difference, but that's the facts. I think the AK 74 was the better of the two rifles. It was developed as the answer to the M-16. It also used the 5.56 rather than the overpowered 7.62. This is an argument for the ages. 7.62 has some good applications (like shooting through stuff to hit people). Then AR couldn't really do that, but the AK could. The AR's bullet would tumble, but the AK's would just slam through. It really just depends on what you need. The 5.56 was brutal on people if it hit them. If a person was hit in the trunk, the bullet would tumble, and destroy their innards. The 7.62 would just go right through them. If they missed a vital organ the soldier would survive. The 5.56 eliminated that risk because of it's tumble when it hit someone.

[@Jabroni_69]

AK47's are really and i mean REALLY CHEAP thats why it is used alot

[@antipolo-tobbypedraza9542]

The AR-15 was designed in 1956/57.

[@tmitchellw1000]

***** 
I think you misunderstood what I said. I said that the AK-47 did not see deployment until 1949. Not 1947. Usually the designation shows when a weapon is ready for action, In 1947 the AK was not in anyone's hands. You must have thought I was comparing the M-16 with the AK-47. I wasn't. I was comparing the ammunition. The AK-74 was the reaction to our more successful 5.56 round that the U.S. began using in Vietnam. Before that we had also used the 7.62 round in the M-1. It just wasn't the 7.62 x 39. It was a 7.62 x 51 or 30-06 round. We switched for Vietnam because we thought the 5.56 was better. The Communist's agreed with the introduction of their AK-74 during the Vietnam war. Unfortunately (for them), they waited too long, and the war was almost over when the AK-74 hit the battlefield. They probably would have creamed us if they had introduced that rifle a year earlier. They would have definitely killed more U.S. soldiers.

[@dlcc3960]

gun? Lol

[@EnPeeSee]

I can't believe people are actually arguing in these comments about the results of a completely unscientific test.

[@evanjfogg]

THANK YOU.

[@dmaxhd1]

ditto

[@vulcanrider2446]

Why does it have to be scientific?
He proved what most people already know to be true.
The AK47 is inherently inaccurate and inherently slow.
Short stubby bullets are not very aerodynamic and not very accurate.
5.56x45 is sleek and aerodynamic with a higher velocity. It is inherently more accurate.
The AK47's much larger bullet and high recoil means it takes longer to reposition for another shot.
The AK47 is inherently inaccurate and inherently slow to re-aim.

[@TheTruth-sd8ey]

@@vulcanrider2446 you're forgeting poor stopping power of 5.56

[@first4851]

u deff took ur time shooting the ak. not fair

[@jesusfloresirurzum9582]

AR-15 and AK 47 amazing rifles , but try in real battle scenario mud , sand ,water the AK is unstopable but both letal machines, el cuerno manda cabrones¡

[@RandomNamejagddjxuossn]

go look at test about the ak-47 in those conditions.

[@KulunuShashika]

wt happen in vietnam?..AK47 won

[@Amend-nr5wg]

Kulunu Shashika Vietnam won? tell that to the near million Vietnamese people who died in that war

[@KulunuShashika]

hahah.lol...this kid..there is no war without dead.

[@Amend-nr5wg]

Kulunu Shashika Vietnam lost near a million people in that war and there's still people in Vietnam being affected by agent orange today Vietnam got butt fucked in that war America might not have won but you can bet your ass America was not beaten

[@johndoe-qw4wu]

ak is more powerful and its almost impossible to jam. u can fire it in rain,sun,snow or sand.

[@cinnreds18]

try that sometime. You ak will make u sad as all other guns will in the
sand :)

[@MrDFRH]

Sun?

[@cinnreds18]

Mr. DFRH think you ment to comment on the guy above, but yea Sun... as in heat can cause alot of problems with you rifle. Same as if you in a fire fight in the Artic the elements wreak havoc on your wepons system.

[@MrDFRH]

cinnreds18 my bad bro. I meant to tag the other guy. I didn't know the sun could effect your rifle. but thanks for letting me know

[@cinnreds18]

Mr. DFRH LOL np np. I didnt mean to say the SUN is the total cause just the heat from the sun.... I doubt its rays have much effect other than that :)

[@rikthdcruze5847]

AK is more reliable and fires bigger rounds.... AR jams easily.... AK RULES baby... not AR...

[@g40rific]

indeed

[@Scatch85_YT]

The AR jam issue was something from decades ago, its just not true today with todays ARs. An NP3 Coated bolt and piston drive is just as reliable as an AK. As the owner of BOTH ARs and AKs as well as many other rifles I really hate the reliability fall back of AK fanbois. The AK does fire a larger, cheaper, less accurate bullet but the AR is way more ergonomical which allows for faster mag changes and slinging more lead down range. I also own, fired and fought with many DI ARs and have never had a weapon fail, ive had bad ammo.

[@Scatch85_YT]

USMCSurvivalist85 Modern day Russian issue AKs do not even fire the 7.62x39 they went to the 5.45 x 39 mm back in the 70s for the same reason the US did, more ammo capacity, flatter trajectory, better accuracy at range. The AK was originally developed 1 for tank operators, 2 under the walking line battle tactic where accuracy didn't really matter you just got on line and sprayed the shit out of everything to keep the enemy pinned and hoped you hit something. That said I love my AK but I also love my AR.

[@rikthdcruze5847]

Russia got more advance Ak type assault rifles, this is like compairing a seige cannon to a bowforts artilary gun...
even so, the AK will stay a formidable opponent to the M type rifles all the time like it always was... "simplicity is power"

[@Scatch85_YT]

They Adopted the AN-94 but it was too expensive to refit everyone with them so Russia still has the AK-74M as the standard issue battle rifle... which has not been advanced in 40 years.

[@KPAH100]

AK-47 was created as a weapon for total war. Low price and reliability of the weapon, that's what the developer wanted.
In 1989, I accidentally found out how much the Soviet Army pays for one AK. The price of the assault rifle was then 32 rubles.
What would you understand ... With this money in the USSR, you could buy 4-5 liters of vodka. 10 liters of the most expensive gasoline in the USSR then cost 3 rubles! And, 10 rubles then changed to 11 dollars!
I hope that I have clearly explained to you

[@aguy3664]

polskie prawda so how much is that in usd

[@ber5598]

32rub= 8usd in 1950s.

[@lazaroeliasruizhernandez8511]

polskie prawda u

[@djlobo5458]

What is the difference between an AR15 and an M4A1?

[@sentenza5766]

M4A1 is capable of semi and full automatic firing, it's an assault carbine.

[@rfnfreitas6211]

ak 47 the best weapon in the world
100% Reliable

[@user-xg2ei6cy9h]

👍

[@husseinelshelemy9035]

👍👌

[@dinobambino7526]

No, the nuclear bomb is...

[@antanassmetona1144]

Stupid

[@machineshop2029]

Best of rebel

[@sam.energym]

You took some time removing the magazine, then your hand slipped off the gun clip..... Ofc... You're not used to the AK

[@Spurrr]

And honestly I would rather have that AK as opposed to the AR tbh

[@Spurrr]

***** Yea like you said he wasnt used to the AK. Also the sights arent very for someone not used to it. Also a bigger round= more recoil but more stopping power

[@sam.energym]

***** Well a guy who uses an AK alot, would get used to the recoil and the sight of the AK (maybe recoil but I don't see any reason to hate the sight)
Take a look at the Russian infantry as example....

[@Spurrr]

Samuel Grimm
Yea. And the sights arent terrible. Just bad for someone used to the AR

[@sam.energym]

***** Those are people who don't use AK... Let me give you an example, I play Airsoft and Paintball, in the both games I use AK guns, they simulate the real life sight, but I dislike the M4 sight, its kind of harder when it comes to place the fork in the center of the ring (M4 sight), specially when the ring is bigger than the fork, but some people don't like the russian sight because of the too far sight from the eye as you said.... but really you wanna compare AR15 you don't compare it with AK47, you could compare it with AK74M, which has a bit reduced Recoil, and also has a better sight, it looks the same, but the sight is bigger, which makes you more accurate.

[@kovacmordus8899]

This test have nothing to do with how fast the rifle is, it's more about how fast you can pull the trigger...

[@tallen4520]

+Kovac Mordus Killing is done better with only the FIRST shot.

[@syukrykirry3473]

Kovac Mordus yeah right bro..

[@vulcanrider2446]

How fast you can re-aim and shoot after each shot has everything to do with the rife.
The AK47 is inherently inaccurate and inherently slow.
Short stubby bullets are not very aerodynamic and not very accurate.
5.56x45 is sleek and aerodynamic with a higher velocity. It is inherently more accurate.
The AK47's much larger bullet and high recoil means it takes longer to reposition for another shot.
The AK47 is inherently inaccurate and inherently slow to re-aim.

[@frankatchison1617]

Did anyone else notice he hit more of th targets w the A.K. ? Also I would like to see the test after 750 rounds to see which functioned better filthy as if in a battle situation!!

[@MrGoranPa]

I don't get this. Are we measuring speed of shooter or rounds? WTF?

[@iLikeC00kieDough]

shooter

[@vulcanrider2446]

Why would you measure rounds?

[@ssdivizion]

Latest AK-12 is one of the best assault rifles in the World!

[@connoroflynn1750]

+Miki Mecov AK 107 is the best though

[@Algoll66]

+Miki Mecov это да, 12-й просто охуительная штука. Но я бы и от АКМ в хозяйство не отказался. Простой, надёжный, смертоносный.

[@APF2K11]

this guy clearly wanted the AR to win

[@nicholasquintero1080]

+yujin nikiporets agree. If he had a Russian soldier shooting that AK I think the time would have been the same, if not an edge to the AK.

[@LTD.Edition]

Higher calibre can't be shot on target as quickly. It's about recoil and getting a proper sight picture before firing.

[@nicholasquintero1080]

+LTD Edition it's about training for a specific goal and having an understanding of your opponents capabilities. In this hypothetical case, an American with an AR. I own both. I can't shoot the AK as fast accurately it's hard to find reasonably priced, range friendly 7.62 so I don't train enough on the 2 stage trigger. Caliber doesn't make any difference to me.

[@اااعجاز]

Because he is American

[@shadwashington3403]

John M.
amen and thank you for your comment

[@tommiemanic76]

lol , the AK was far more devastating and accurate!

[@jjwrx8]

ar didn't miss the ak did.

[@tommiemanic76]

And if it was a Russian made video I bet the AR would have come off second best lol .

[@vulcanrider2446]

The AR and the 5.56 is better, by far. It's a "no brainer".
All things being equal, 2 armies, one armed with AR-5.56 will defeat an army armed with AK47-7.62 every time.
The AR-5.56 has 2 major advantages. It is more accurate, and you can carry significantly more rounds.
The AK47 has 2 major disadvantages. You have to fire more rounds to hit your target, and you can't carry nearly as many rounds. Throughout the course of the battle, the army armed with AK47's will lose troops at a faster rate due to having less accuracy and less effective range. Soon, the AK47 army will find itself outnumbered, and they will be dropping at an even faster rate.
The guys with AK47's will run out of ammo far sooner due to the fact that they started with far fewer rounds and having to fire more rounds in order to hit their target. The first army to run out of ammo or troops loses. With the AK47, you lose on both counts.
Let's say each soldier in both armies carry 28 pounds of weapon and ammo. The AK47 weighs 1.3 pounds more than the AR-556. A fully loaded AR-15 weighs slightly less than an empty AK47. That weight difference alone means the AR-556 army can carry an extra 40 more rounds per soldier. If you run out of ammo and I still have 40 rounds left, YOU lose. But since I also fire fewer rounds to hit my target, I'll probably have more than 40 rounds left.
The ammunition of the AK47, the 7.62 x 39 weighs 63% more than the 5.56. Both armies are carrying 20 pounds of ammo per man. The AR-556 army will have 540 rounds per man + that 40 mentioned earlier. The AK47 army will have only 330 rounds per man. The AR army has 250 rounds per man advantage. But once again, since the AR army fires fewer rounds to hit a target, they will have more than 250 rounds advantage, maybe a 300 or 350 round advantage per soldier.
The AK47's accuracy problem . . .
Even a quality AK has the same problem as a cheaply made AK, which is more typical and what you find on the battlefields across the world. Expensive or cheap, they both use the same short stubby bullet with less velocity, which is inherently less accurate. It's not very aerodynamic. It's more like a pistol bullet. The 5.56 is sleek, aerodynamic, and very fast. It is inherently more accurate.
Now add in the fact that the 5.56 has less kick. You have better control and better aim in rapid fire situations, not necessarily fully automatic. This adds additional accuracy to the weapon system. And because there is less kick, getting off follow up shots in rapid succession is quicker. If you can fire more rapidly with better aim, you will kill more of your enemy at a faster rate. This is really what makes the big difference in accuracy.
I was going to say . . .
The AK47 is more reliable, almost never jams. If you keep your AR15/M4 clean, it is just as reliable. But the AK47 is the clear winner here, since keeping your weapon clean might be difficult to do in real world situations.
But then, I found several videos testing out this apparent myth . . .
AR vs AK mud test
ua-cam.com/video/9APzYqwXckw/v-deo.html
This AR15 mud test was performed right after last week's AK47 test: the same exact mud, the same wheelbarrow, at the same location, a mere 10 minutes later.
ua-cam.com/video/YAneTFiz5WU/v-deo.html
AK47 Mud Test
ua-cam.com/video/DX73uXs3xGU/v-deo.html
But the biggest reason why everyone loves the AK47 so much is because of it's power compared to the "wimpy" AR15/M4. It fires a much bigger round, with a lot of kick, and a lot of punch. Macho guys love that. All that power is great for shooting through cars and knocking down a cinder block wall, but for shooting human targets, they are both equally lethal. In my opinion, the 5.56 is more lethal. The AK47 round will punch a hole right through you. But, so will a 5.56. However, the 5.56 will do it in a more destructive nasty way. As soon as it hits flesh, or anything actually, it will start to tumble and little bits of the bullet will start to break off and go in different directions causing a lot of collateral damage. It doesn't punch a clean hole through you. It will tumble through you and break up into little pieces. The 5.56 is a very small diameter bullet, but not when it is going through you sideways.
The 5.56 is also a much faster bullet. When it hits flesh it causes your body to explode, in a way. Ever seen a water jug hit by a bullet? A human being is 70% water. It doesn't just punch a hole in the jug. It causes the jug to explode. The faster the bullet, the bigger the explosion. That explosive effect adds to the trauma of the wound. It will rupture internal organs and sever arteries. The 5.56 makes up for it's smaller size by hitting you harder with it's speed. I think you are more likely to die getting hit by a 5.56. In my opinion, the 5.56 is a more lethal round.
All things considered, I think the AR15/M4 is a much better weapon system than the AK47.

[@whisky_tango_fox503]

@@vulcanrider2446 you're right about the good pros about the 5.56, if you saw and invested the situation of Kyle Rittenhouse you can see that he killed 2 commies, pedophiles with not more than 2 shoots

[@midlifecrisisactor7655]

@@vulcanrider2446 outstanding!!!

[@warHawk1944]

run that ar over in a humvee then do the same to the ak and see which fires

[@devinmiller2329]

CerberesFang probably both

[@SVD88]

This is AKM not AK-47. This funny shooter even doesn't know the difference between..

[@user-ib4sk2uc3k]

+Razum +

[@user-gb6gw6cx9s]

+SVD88 AKM就是比47多个枪口斜角，减少点枪口上跳而已，没什么大区别

[@chengyihuang4691]

呵呵老子翻墙过来的 二吧基佬？

[@msabullet8239]

SVD88 this is Ak 47 no AKM You are ediat

[@braddekker2430]

Minus the 5 aeconds he wasted doeing a false mag release and charge and several of the shots he paused for no reason (he was still on target).

[@bencorrell7851]

I am a veteran of the 1st armored division. All of my army career involved an extensive knowledge of the M4. It is a fantastic weapon. HOWEVER, I am more comfortable with my AK. It is solid, it is weatherproof, it is idiot proof. Hickok45 put it this way: the ak is the hatchet in warfare, and the AR is the scalpel. This is very true. Each weapon has its place. The AR is much more accurate long range. I have bolt action rifles that are far superior to the AR. The ak is very accurate despite the current media portrayal of it being a prey and spray weapon. Ive hit targets with my ak that I am very happy with. Could I have hit further targets with my AR? YES. but if I had time to prepare for distance shots, id go with my 300 ultra mag any day.

[@Rauser142]

Everyone on the internet is a veteran.

[@aaronposteraro1986]

Fudd

5.56x45 vs 5.45x39 would have been a more interesting match.

[@sagarabags2692]

Iñigo Zapata s

[@massey-rn8mq]

I own both and really enjoy both but I do like the fact the 7.62x39 has a tapered case which helps w extraction and steel case is so much more affordable:

[@spartanecspartan5189]

you just can't shoot the AK

[@AlphaHeLIxCIA]

Yes you can

[@pastrano240sx]

U lagged on the ak47 from the start. You miss counted on shots and the ak47 reload was screwed up.

[@bdthray2141]

he lagged on purpose and ak is more powerful

[@taeyeung007]

BD Thray he kept trying to fire when there was clearly no more bullets at the end of the first round lol

[@bdthray2141]

taeyeung007 yeah he done that on purpose

[@bdthray2141]

***** Idk but i'm about to be ur step dad

[@SlyBoyKash]

The AK is trash compared to the AR lol. The AR 10 shits on it to. lol

[@antongranik]

My mama always says "Stupid is as stupid does".

[@mrpiratefox4497]

Simple:
AR15: more accurrate, less recoil, more ROF, but smaller rounds
AK47: more damage(7.62 mm cal.), less ROF( it was created in 1947, while the automatic version of the m16/m4a1/ AR15, was created almost 30 years later, with better technology)stronger, but more recoil and because of that, less accurate

[@grim7965]

an AK-47 is kind of like an AR-15 but it's for men.

[@The_best_Parker_ever]

This is one of the best things I've seen on the internet this comment made me laugh

[@grim7965]

+Bailey Keel (Yugioh_101) it's funny because it's true 😊

[@EVILSLAY]

there is nothing manly in guns, any coward can aim and shoot a gun. swords on the other hand, that's manly.

[@benmansourmahdi9097]

agreed

[@llbryant47]

I'm a women and I love it!

[@williamcarmine8868]

Hate to be this guy, but they are assault rifle, not battle rifles, Intermediate calibers are assault rifles. Now, for everyone who says that AK is better than the AR, you're dead wrong. The "M4" is beat out by the AKM-47 for reliability, but everything is faster with the "M4". HOWEVER, most people forget that the AR 15 has DI or gas pistol options, it can fire the 5.56x45mm AND the 7.62x39mm. The AR 15 is better by far. And for those who would like to test the AK vs M16A1, how about we test the M16A1 vs the AK-47 type 1.

[@imbrandon16]

BOOM.

[@Adriano0net]

Fast shoot is the best criteria for a comparison... -_-
Clearly not an Ak shooter to take so much time...

[@danielrhapael7461]

Adriano Müller you look like kwebblekop

[@Adriano0net]

fuck

[@vulcanrider2446]

Fast shooting should also take into account accuracy.
If it doesn't hit, it doesn't count. Anyone can rapidly squeeze off a bunch of rounds.
The AK47 is inherently inaccurate and inherently slow.
Short stubby bullets are not very aerodynamic and not very accurate.
5.56x45 is sleek and aerodynamic with a higher velocity. It is inherently more accurate.
The AK47's much larger bullet and high recoil means it takes longer to reposition for another shot.
The AK47 is inherently inaccurate and inherently slow.

[@robbierichardson6992]

He didn’t try as hard with the AK-47 you can see that

[@InsaneMetalSoldier]

I stopped taking the video serious after the "america for the win baby blablabla"

[@CajunRulez]

***** Too bad you don't like a winner. USA! USA! USA! God Bless America. Baseball, apple pie, V8 engines, and real football. There......take that you commie.

[@InsaneMetalSoldier]

Hahaha, who said I don't like USA? I just don't like when a video gets unbiased because American baby

[@umbertocantoro1786]

CajunRulez ahahahahah obesity,ignorance,mediocrity,a country that experiences lots of homicides into schools and is not able to influence the weapons business because of the infinite power of the lobbies.You are the 5th essence of capitalism,so the 5th essence of shit

[@InsaneMetalSoldier]

Umberto Cantoro Oops, time to mute this post

[@user-xi6bd1cj4m]

***** when did america babe win? just against poor country like iraq and ..! just iraq all usa wars was a loose xD looser ! but at last they wer kicked from iraq too xDD

[@TheUnpredictableJack]

Oh the smaller round is better! Can you admit the AK-47 is better but you cant just shoot? :D :D

[@AaronNazzy]

The Unpredictable Jack I was about to say that.

[@Datacorrupter234]

The Unpredictable Jack its heavy and its recoil system recoils more

[@Datacorrupter234]

The Unpredictable Jack everyone loves ar15 ergonomics. they are simple my fav

[@TheUnpredictableJack]

It has worse recoil but its much much stronger...the guy took more time reloading etc so its not a fair comparison

[@benkab6897]

Do you how much weight the Ak 47

[@ridingbeutifullplacesshera6353]

You know that Russian Weapons are never fails

[@vulcanrider2446]

You know that is a very popular myth.
This AR15 mud test was performed right after last week's AK47 test: the same exact mud, the same wheelbarrow, at the same location, a mere 10 minutes later.
ua-cam.com/video/YAneTFiz5WU/v-deo.html
AK47 Mud Test
ua-cam.com/video/DX73uXs3xGU/v-deo.html

[@noledelgado8111]

I have a question: What's the difference between AR-15 and M-16? They look the same and they're both automatic. Any answers?

[@dewhicular]

You sandbagged it with the AK dude, clear to see.

[@SlyBoyKash]

The AR is a far more better Gun. Its like comparing a mediocre chick to a dime piece.

[@David-mi3vx]

Ar15 is a peice of shit.

[@abcdaw22]

I own a AK, and plan too own a AR in the future when my budget lets. Both are great guns, but in a combat situation, I would pick the AR over my AK. Just the unbiased truth. Can't go wrong with both guns. AR and AK FTW

[@atanasmiltenov]

You don't understand of wepons so shut up

[@KingIrbisandComrades]

тест лажа. АК-47 намного лучше AR-15. в бою точно. доказано и не раз.

[@rjlee3112]

In what way would the AR be a better gun? Oh, because its American and so are you, right?

[@TommyCease-zd3qt]

AR-15 is a semi automatic civilian rifle
AK-47 Is a selective fire semi or fully automatic military assault rifle.

[@vulcanrider2446]

Is the civilian version, the ones we have access to, of the AK-47 fully automatic?

[@TommyCease-zd3qt]

Charles Wolf I agree

[@iampappu25]

AK-47 Legend of all Guns don't comparison with Legend made in soviot Union -Russia

[@sadiel2109]

PAPPU RAZ 👍

[@Hoveringpear]

It’s the peasant gun

[@adam-od7ow]

Not really.

[@xolo2282]

PAPPU RAZ Shut up and respect the precision and deadly ballistics of the M16 🤔"

[@xolo2282]

PAPPU RAZ The M16 will always be better then the retarded Ak"

[@eugenekalashnokov1525]

I think it would be a more fair assessment of these weapon systems to do a test with a standard AR like you did, but with an AK74 considering the 5.45 is much more similar to the 5.56. You'll generally shoot quicker with a lighter round, because you have better follow up shots. Anyways still a cool video.

[@kkuja78]

Q: What do you think this proves? A: Nothing. It only proves that you shoot slower with AK, not which is better. So, please, in future, have some quality in your work.

[@Exposinggoodandbad1]

nguyen danny yet the ar has more problems

[@chsims7032]

Have you ever thought that he might shoot slower with the AK is because: 1) the AK with the 7.62x39 round and inherent design gives it more recoil and induces some muzzle jump.
2) the sights are just terrible when compared to the M16 family of rifles. The open notch/post configuration coupled with a very short sight radius makes it harder to fire accurately and quickly pull off a follow-up shot without having to take some time to recover and regain your sight picture.
The M16 by design was made to fire a small round at very high velocities accurately. The AK was meant for mass volumes of fire.

[@wixte]

"have some quality in your work".
Go to Heckler & Koch (HK) and look at the xm8, and the other guns they've had in military.

[@ivanandreev1958]

Well, u proved that u cant shot with ak-47 :)

[@vulcanrider2446]

Nobody can.
The high recoil means it takes longer to reposition for another shot.

[@tacticalfall4505]

The reason he was slower with the AK seems more like because he wasn’t as experienced with it. You can see during the reload he froze a bit and also didn’t know where to grab the charging handle. Get some more experience on it then try again; you’ll get more accurate (no pun intended) results.

[@user-bg7vj1pw6j]

May be more correct to compare the АК74 and AR15? The AK74 have less recoil and have better accuracy vs AK47
imho

[@harvokgamer2651]

weird, despite firing the 7x62 and the ar15 firing 5x56, ak has less recoil

[@user-bj3it2zw5e]

объективность этого теста просто зашкаливает

[@hamzamahdi104]

Ak47 legendary and most killer gun ever In weapons history 💀

[@bobjohnson3175]

Now I understand why the AR is THE go to choice of school shooters, club shooters, and concert shooters!

[@GameCanalGeki]

AR 15 SHEAT, AK 47 WIN!

[@chris88331]

your shit

[@chris88331]

***** <
say the one with the stupid ass name lol funny kid nice name fucking douche i own a AR and have used ak all kinds of aks so stfu

[@nawleansboy]

A.K. is just spray and pray u get a american gun then u have accuracy M16... A.R. 15 nuff said

[@GameCanalGeki]

пойми если война начнется всем пиздец и ваша м 16 заклинит и не сможет вам помочь так как она говно

[@yanivelbaz100]

Shit*

[@mindtomachine]

Man look at that target dance with the AK, didn't even move with the AR

[@nikolayskvotsov3868]

AK47 was not designed by Kalashnikov, it was designed by Hugo Shmicer and he recieved Stalins Award fot it. I am from Russia but we should not lie. We should tell truth. It is not a russian rifle it is german nazi rifle. By the way, it is very good, but it was even better. But USSR factories were not good enough to produce it so developers made it simplier to produce and a little bit worse.

[@thebplate]

I just wasted 3:53 mins of my life ;c

[@jatinkarwasara9847]

PixelFalls 3.54

[@r1ckySV]

I want my minutes back

[@axiewine2730]

Crypse 👎

[@nightbot9823]

Crypse 👎 U wrong

[@bsalley76]

That was stupid!!! you can he deliberately took more time with the AK!

[@tawon1984]

He also tried to keep shooting when he was obviously out of rounds at the end

[@tallen4520]

+Brian Salley I saw it several times. The shooter was well rehearsed for this video.

[@xVictorDavidx]

Totally agree!!!

[@bsalley76]

Yep,,I own 3 ;)

[@shurka26]

Yeah..dumb ass promoting retarded AR-15...

[@CombatPerspective]

If that's the way you feel then look up larry vikers video on the STG-44 vs AR 15, Hes a huge AR fan and out performs himself with a 70 year old assault rifle. There really is no competition. The AR has a weaker round with less penetration, On a over priced lighter platform. If you get the correct version of the ak 47-112, they are the best assault rifles on the planet. Reliable, Powerful, Simple, and cheap. Just because somethingis made in America theses days doesn't mean quality, not anymore.

[@brahim9709]

+1

[@DemarticusStoneGaming]

You also have to take into consideration the 5.56/.223 was never meant to fully penetrate the target like a 7.62 will, the 5.56/.223 was designed to break apart upon entry of the target, thus creating more wound channels, 7.62 just passes through the target with little to no mushroom effect.

[@cig177]

When it come to lethality, dependability, cost, power and simplicity, you are correct, the AK is a better platform.
But the M4 is much, much more accurate. In every firing mode, semi, burst, auto...and that's why governments that have the option of choosing between the two platforms choose the M4/M16 platform.

[@cig177]

+Demarticus Stone what?! I'm a big fan of both platforms, but the 762 has mushroom effect, lol. It may not be as efficient of one as the 556, but when the 762 hits its target, from any range but especially medium-long, it tumbles, devastating that target. Doing much more damage on average than the AK.

[@WatDaMattaForYou]

Now don't get mad at the AR15.

[@GGGNVideos]

Boy, you certainly took your time with the AK.

[@letsbuilda4ort]

Bad day Russia. Lol. That was fun to watch.
What kind of AR is that? My favorite AR look.

[@Minn-Adventure]

i thought you were FPR russia until i didnt hear that accent and until i read the name LOL

[@coopercritchfield2968]

*FPS and that's also not his real accent

[@FlyTour69]

Apparently 667 and counting hard core AK fans are having a bad day.
They just can't accept defeat.

[@FlyTour69]

jozo masic Like I said, they (you) just can't accept defeat.

[@DrHavoc1]

The best part is that the AK that this guy is shooting is almost identical to the one the Soviets produced in 1948, while the M4 he is using is a long way from the AR15 of 1957. Modern AK's use the 5.45 round as you probably know and handle much better.

[@redflint7651]

i'm a big guy ... i'll stick with the AK the recoil is non existent !

[@redflint7651]

***** America owns you , bitch.

[@DrHavoc1]

*****
FAMAS is a horrible weapon.

[@aronafall550]

Was he on the army Us forces ??

[@indiaproperties2349]

its a masterpiece by Michael Kalashnikov in 1947 , and till today this gun is unstoppable & holds a record of manufacturing in different AK variants is about 200 million guns .

[@user-to1du9pk6o]

It is not AK-47, it is AKM!!!!!!!!!!

[@user-to1du9pk6o]

Max а че так?

[@andreylevenov2899]

+Игорь В. объяснить не можешь т.к. у тебя патриотизм в голове а знаний ноль. Это АКМ в обвесе, понять что за производитель НЕЛЬЗЯ на 100% с этого видео, и я тебя расстрою "копии" которыми ты их назвал, конструктивно ничем не отличаются, и теже болгары и особенно китайцы (как бы это не странно звучало) на рынке США - гораздо качественнее чем сайга российская, это факт. Я понимаю, что ТВ вещь сильная но времена СССР давно прошли, и то, что сейчас делает россия - говно, увы.

[@Max34557]

Andrey Levenov Do you wanna get a McBlyat ay McDonalds?

[@andreylevenov2899]

Max what? go to school, children.

[@Max34557]

Andrey Levenov Ayy lmao. Don't understand sarcasm? Kid.

[@franchi123]

RUSSIAN WEAPONS > us weapons

[@BloodofPatriots]

Why don't you run a AK-74 (not 47) vs. AR15?

[@scar-lmc9672]

*AK-47* ea *AR-15* duas armas de potência extrema em combate assim Como a *Machine Gun Shoot* que Admiro pra Caramba !

[@Skywalker1427]

How about firing an AK-74 with 5.45 instead of AK with 7.62? How can you compare weapons with completely different calibers?

[@najabatkamal]

sometimes somethings are not good but their beauty attracts us. i dont know which one is better but i like ak 47 beauty wise and assault wise :)

[@markowilson7423]

I’ve shot both guns. I prefer the AR over the AK anyday

[@-_Nuke_-]

The fact alone that the AK has no rails, makes it a no-go for me

[@KaskadeHD]

all these ak fan boys getting all pissy. hahahhhahahaha

[@oruwatching]

Try an AK 74 next time. :-)

[@a.w.w.728]

I bought a Sam7r-66 Arsenal AK-47 I recently did a carbine vitals course and I was the only AK guy there everyone else had ARs. Needless to say when we came to the jam drills and getting back up and running after a jam I'm glad I went with an AK-47. AK all day everyday. Nice ARs too. DD LWRC you name it.

[@kirillvasilkov7150]

you forgot to mention the 2.5 second delay you took to shoot the AK47 "mericuh for the win"

[@Christopher408]

Kirill Vasilkov respectfully.... it's not the gun..it's the person shooting the gun...

[@rocdarjargm]

he did ok, I can run my AR faster than my AK, mag changes was the cause of 6 seconds.

[@shurka26]

Don't get cot by FBI with those weapons you have... otherwise have fun shooting in the deep woods

[@Mikkhailov]

That was a terrible reload you had on that Romanian AKM.

[@rudyratfinger9756]

Hes shooting the ak like a grandpa would drive a lamborghini

[@seppe6077]

That reload for the ak was sick

[@beantown_beatz4026]

obviously the AR is going to fire faster, its a much smaller round to cycle

[@ArtyomBlin7595]

GJ bro becasue it matters how big the round is ? And in fact the ar is made ot have a better firing rate...

[@beantown_beatz4026]

heero yuy Ya no kidding it is, that's good old American gunsmithing, which I do on the side. Yes the round length and width both play a role in firing rate. Take the SAW m249, Cyclic rate is 650 to 850 rounds per minute. Compaire that to the RPK which is around 600. I have built weapons and the larger calibur always fires slower. Only once or twice the performance of the platform surprised me

[@overgamer13]

justin overlie
And now compare with the 1500 rpm of the MG42.

[@kyleallison7106]

The mechanical difference is negligible, especially in semi automatic fire. The AK was fired more slowly because the individual in this video was far more comfortable and probably favored the AR. The AK recoil is not significant enough to produce significantly longer re-engagement times for a shooter with comparable experience on both platforms.

[@kyleallison7106]

justin overlie Incorrect. Cyclic fire rate has little to do with caliber, and nearly everything to do with design. The RPK has a slower fire rate than the (shitty-I say so because I was stuck with it on a deployment) m249 because of major design differences. The M249 fires from an open bolt, and is belt fed, the two primary reasons it has a higher rate of fire. The RPK is essential an AKM with a heavy barrel, receiver, and some minor differences to make it more suited to sustained fire. It has essentially the same bolt, gas system and bolt carrier group as an AKM and because a large BCG is part of the AK design this heavier weight and inertia give it its comparably slower fire rate. That being said, the 650 RPM+ fire rate of the AK is PLENTY for any shooter. Full Automatic has only two real functions in combat. Surpression of the enemy threat, and close quarters combat. More often the former than the latter.

[@redcat608]

AK all day, from an American.

[@n3green505]

*0:05** seconds into the video I could tell the outcome. Damn hill billy*

[@redstarr9roman]

What a great vid m8! While I agree that you can't deny the speed boost, damn, that ak round did a number on those targets when you landed them! Would not want to be hit with that down range. Like your show, good luck :).

[@jtguns88]

Why did you slow down your rate of fire with the AK on the 50 and 100 yards targets? Recoil? I can shoot both the same speed. I will get more hits on target with my AR.

[@TheUnpredictableJack]

LoL :D If it didnt take so much time for you to use the AK....this is the test of how bad you can shoot not how bad the AR-15 compares to the awesome AK-47

[@lumberjackagies5158]

The Unpredictable Jack absolutely correct

[@TheDroidekas]

The Unpredictable Jack Some american soldiers scavenged ak-47 from the viet kong for their reliability over their m16.

[@TheUnpredictableJack]

TheDroidekas Yep...the AK 47 is a very good weapon...as far as i know the recoil and the speed is worse than the M16...its not a big problem as its rocking a much stronger ammunition

[@jor.5031]

TheDroidekas Thats actually a myth. Very few did that for a couple of reason. First is very obvious. If a US soldier saw the tip of an AK sticking out of a bush, they would immidiately open fire upon the person, thinking it was the Viet cong. Second, AK ammo wasnt issued by the US army, and therefore they would have to scavenge it. USA had a program where they sabotaged AK round and placed them back in Viet Cong stashes, so they would explode inside the guns. That means that if US soldiers scavenged AK ammo from a place and got one of those rounds, they would probably die.

[@TheDroidekas]

So discovery channel is actually myth channel ?
I know about the sabotaged rounds so stories are misleading

[@bystormproductions5163]

I love both of these guns. I only have a video of me and a AR-15 but I have used the AK-47 numerous times.

[@andersonlee4099]

People always want to make the AK vs AR debate about the American rifle vs Foreign rifle but some of these same people wouldn't touch an American pistol

[@tmp1957]

i have used both, they will both kill just as effectively in the proper hands. trust me on this one.

[@najabatkamal]

thumbs up for ak 47.

[@Pahadi.Bhandari.]

Najabat Kamal be Dr hmm information financial FM uncomfortable original go all&gggj,j,bv@gžzZzzzzzzZzz zzz

[@nesgibaemiy3334]

These "bad" machine -based AK produced more than seventy million copies worldwide ! Many countries have caused his image on national flags ! But the main advantages : simplicity of design , reliability , dependability , and ease of maintenance make the best of the best ! AK47 - legend

[@albertojuarez8324]

The ar might have one the battle but the AK always wins the war 💪🏽

[@mestrebruno9015]

this is not ak 47

[@rusmor3318]

согласен

[@RivalCargo438]

а что у ак вначале с концом ствола?

[@realpavito]

Кириллов Петр yep we know

[@user-dw2ul2xu2h]

Кириллов Петр Раньше был такой компенсатор отдачи - направлял ствол во время выстрела вниз и влево. Сейчас стоит дульный тормоз-компенсатор.

[@realpavito]

Евгений Акопов of course, of course

[@goesohard]

cant compare the 2 in a speed drill just because of recoil. its ar vs 74

[@JamesKaret]

both good guns. but how you trained with them is more important.
if you trained enough with ak, ak could be faster than ar, i believe.

[@rsz90182]

Wow man you have a talent there.