China’s New Carrier - New Headache ?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 тра 2024
  • Whatsapp - whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4L...
    Telegram - t.me/AlphaDefenseOriginal
    Discord - / discord
    Our Web:alphadefense.in
    FB: / thealphadefense
    Twitter: @alpha_defense
    Instagram: @thealphadefense
    Alpha Defense Hindi: / alphadefensehindi​​​​​​​​
    #AlphaDefense​​​​​​​​ #IndianArmy #DRDO

КОМЕНТАРІ • 211

  • @K3ppa
    @K3ppa 25 днів тому +73

    The same was said about when Shandong was constructed. Its been 5 years. They still aren’t in Indian Ocean despite having the largest Navy. Although i Hope third carrier of India Should be same as Charles De Gaulle.

    • @AvijeetGupta
      @AvijeetGupta 25 днів тому +7

      Offcourse not as we've our own heroes

    • @dejikay2564
      @dejikay2564 25 днів тому +6

      I think the Chinese strategy to acquire ports around India is the same so that their subs can dock and restock there.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 25 днів тому

      Lol !
      Stupidity at its finest.
      Their carrier isn't in the Indian ocean because no need for that arises.
      Pick a fight against China and you will find their entire navy leveling India into a parking lot.

    • @abhilashkumar5661
      @abhilashkumar5661 25 днів тому +4

      Their 1st priority is covering both north and south China sea. They need the carrier for defense 1st. Now they have a better carrier and have a possibility to send any one of them to other offshore locations. Numbers do matter. They have multiple bases now across the indian ocean and can use these carriers on chokepoints too.

    • @technicalad1013
      @technicalad1013 24 дні тому

      Bro he was taking a out nuclear powered catbar carrier charles de gaulle of french navy ​@@AvijeetGupta

  • @cyruslovesindia
    @cyruslovesindia 25 днів тому +41

    2011 China zero aircraft carriers. 13-14 years later. 3 Aircraft Carriers. Hmm okay

    • @hiteshrohra2991
      @hiteshrohra2991 25 днів тому +14

      Yup here everthing is stuck on government approvals release of fund and frequent delays but thats not the case for china

    • @dejikay2564
      @dejikay2564 25 днів тому +5

      The first aircraft carrier bought as junk from ex-soviet country for scrapping... but....

    • @dejikay2564
      @dejikay2564 25 днів тому +6

      While India junked it's Vikrant which could have been saved and refurbished the same way

    • @Rishabh-ty3gr
      @Rishabh-ty3gr 25 днів тому +3

      @@hiteshrohra2991 well you don't want to go that path initial days for china were tough nothing India has seen in decades the military had a great amount of control in the government. Currently everything they have is on the back of Brute force application of policies somewhere we have to understand that a dictatorship turned into a single party democracy is somewhere better in defence than a multi party weak democracy turned into a single party democracy. Want good defence? Choose the nationalists you have 60% chance of being the defence powerhouse, or a beggar.

    • @r185ya
      @r185ya 25 днів тому +1

      ​@@Rishabh-ty3gr economy matters, on which china is focusing from 80's

  • @bbhattacharya2010
    @bbhattacharya2010 25 днів тому +21

    Our scotch loving military leadership is busy scouting European locations for AIP subs while DRDO can produce them domestically.
    Jab tak iss desh mai Chandigarh Gang hai, hum kabhi serious pole nahi bna payenge!
    Ab toh Turkish Navy bhi IOR enter karne wali hai

    • @iimcrandomgamer711
      @iimcrandomgamer711 25 днів тому +4

      I think we already had plans to integrate Drdo Aip in kalvery class submarine.

    • @vishaldeka5298
      @vishaldeka5298 25 днів тому +3

      If we had a serious military leadership, Tejas naval variants would have by been flying from INS Vikrant by now. But now we have to wait another 5 years for Rafales to arrive and not even God knows when TEDBF will be ready. If they had any vision at all, the 26 rafales would have been ordered 5 years back so that they could be integrated with Vikrant as soon as it is ready,

    • @TheFreelancer007
      @TheFreelancer007 25 днів тому +2

      @@vishaldeka5298 Benchmarking and evaluation is being conducted by using Tejas NP 1 and database from the process will be used for more advanced Tedbf aircraft. And that is time consuming process 2-3 years and maybe more.

    • @averagestudent5223
      @averagestudent5223 23 дні тому

      liquor quota se teri jalti kyu hai

  • @rohandwivedi8141
    @rohandwivedi8141 25 днів тому +50

    The reason why Chinese military shipbuilding is so powerful is because they have a humongous civilian ship building infrastructure that they can rely on to build extra capacity this is very important as us which is current largest Navy in the cannot match plan in shipbuilding tonnage also

    • @piyushmoond6850
      @piyushmoond6850 25 днів тому +4

      Paisa bhai paisa thats all

    • @rohandwivedi8141
      @rohandwivedi8141 25 днів тому +4

      Bhai paisa us ke pass bhi hai , ye bat efficiency and cost pe ati

    • @viveksorathiya2057
      @viveksorathiya2057 25 днів тому

      USA already building 2 Gerald class carrier. Their ship building ain't no less , 10s of destroyers , subs

    • @rohandwivedi8141
      @rohandwivedi8141 25 днів тому +6

      @@viveksorathiya2057 yes they are , but their biggest issue is thier ship building industry is completely dependent on us Navy for orders as they don't have any civilian ship building industry cause they can't compete with china and Korea on labour cost

  • @bean-dg7jp
    @bean-dg7jp 25 днів тому +32

    Good night kaise bolu abh 😅

    • @deltaandD7516
      @deltaandD7516 25 днів тому +7

      Average night... 👍😐

    • @rohandwivedi8141
      @rohandwivedi8141 25 днів тому +4

      The reason why Chinese military shipbuilding is so powerful is because they have a humongous civilian ship building infrastructure that they can rely on to build extra capacity this is very important as us which is current largest Navy in the cannot match plan in shipbuilding tonnage also

    • @povlife7024
      @povlife7024 25 днів тому

      Chinese femdom videos dekho and kush raho
      goodnight

    • @jayrajput6629
      @jayrajput6629 25 днів тому +1

      Sleep tight

    • @AsifAli-nb7ix
      @AsifAli-nb7ix 25 днів тому

      Why..? Are u scared bro 👀
      We have the indian navy for our protection so sleep calmly💯🤍

  • @bebyfun
    @bebyfun 25 днів тому +25

    फाइटर जेट से फाइटर जेट,
    कैरियर से कैरियर,
    सबमरीन से सबमरीन
    तो बराबरी कर नही सकते चीन जैसे फास्ट मैन्युफैक्चर देश से..
    बचाव सिस्टम में ही निवेश सुरक्षा का आखरी उपाय है

    • @deltaandD7516
      @deltaandD7516 25 днів тому +1

      Love from bhutaan 🇧🇹

    • @rohandwivedi8141
      @rohandwivedi8141 25 днів тому +1

      The reason why Chinese military shipbuilding is so powerful is because they have a humongous civilian ship building infrastructure that they can rely on to build extra capacity this is very important as us which is current largest Navy in the cannot match plan in shipbuilding tonnage also

  • @sanjeetsingh9063
    @sanjeetsingh9063 24 дні тому

    bhaiya video nahi aai counter option ka?

  • @Tsarthak
    @Tsarthak 24 дні тому

    Conventional powered hai to bhaiyya ye bataye ki emals aur range pe kya effect padega

  • @ashokirkal5850
    @ashokirkal5850 25 днів тому

    I was thinking about this and got this video 🙏😊

  • @akashsahani7746
    @akashsahani7746 25 днів тому

    Right.

  • @tashiyann3262
    @tashiyann3262 12 днів тому +1

    बेगाने शादी मैं अब्दुल्ला दीवाना ......वह अपने पैसा है और अपना पैसे से ही बनाया तुमको क्या खुजली हो रहा है

  • @adityaroy1590
    @adityaroy1590 25 днів тому

    Kya IAC 2 pe catapult nehi use Kiya ja sakta??

  • @tashiyann3262
    @tashiyann3262 12 днів тому +1

    बेगाने शादी मैं अब्दुल्ला दीवाना

  • @anshkashyap5880
    @anshkashyap5880 25 днів тому

    What is the payload capacity and fuel capacity of mig 29 k from Vikrant and Vikramaditya?

  • @Chingping9043
    @Chingping9043 25 днів тому

    can carrier launched Hale uav like Cats Warrior or ghatak provide similar capabilities like carrier-launched aewcs? and can it(uav) be operated from a stobar carrier without any compromise? (which will be better as more number of uavs can be placed in a carrier than bulky aewcs)

  • @animeshkarjee1827
    @animeshkarjee1827 25 днів тому +1

    Eagerly waiting to know Nosena ka options...

  • @vishalchaudhary2710
    @vishalchaudhary2710 25 днів тому +7

    kabhi kabhi ye dekh ke khushi hoti hai ki kam se kam koi desh to hai jo American carriers ke kareem pohoch raha chahe vo china hi kyo na ho

    • @TheFreelancer007
      @TheFreelancer007 25 днів тому

      Americans have 6 Nimitz class ultra heavy Aircraft Carrier Battle group(fleet of ships along carriers), 3 Endeavour class Carriers, and a small carrier operating Harriers decommissioned around 2013 but kept in a ready to launch at sea mode as a heli carrier. Chinese are nearby in displacement of ship by quantity and quality of the carriers remains unmatched.

  • @me_shub_bhai
    @me_shub_bhai 24 дні тому

    Nice work brother 🚩🇮🇳🚩

  • @anirecapped.
    @anirecapped. 25 днів тому

    Options?? Deploy as many anti-ship missile batteries in the AN islets as money and space would allow along with some AWACS, MPAs and over the horizon radars for guidance, command and control.

  • @damayantideka5472
    @damayantideka5472 25 днів тому

    Jaihind.

  • @saurabh5991
    @saurabh5991 25 днів тому +2

    China ki speed bahut tej hai .. they commissioned their first carrier in 2012. Now they are launching 3rd carrier with in 12 years.. almost 2 times bigger than the 1st one...

  • @irfan5336
    @irfan5336 14 днів тому +1

    Big achievement at a big moment.

  • @rajatkumarmukherjee5437
    @rajatkumarmukherjee5437 23 дні тому

    And what is the status of project 75 alpha?

  • @suvarnanaam
    @suvarnanaam 25 днів тому

    Good Night... Jai Hind... Eagerly awaiting for morning.

  • @abhirammani3417
    @abhirammani3417 25 днів тому +4

    India should go for 75 ton carrier min with France. That’s better for India. Rather than repeat order than iac 1

    • @ianchen8582
      @ianchen8582 14 днів тому +2

      France’s new carrier is expected to begin construction in 2031 and enter service in 2038, so India is willing to wait for 15-20 years for a 3rd carrier?

  • @amarjeetbadhani3616
    @amarjeetbadhani3616 25 днів тому

    JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @SUMITSINGH-tf5tn
    @SUMITSINGH-tf5tn 25 днів тому +1

    Indians Kya pade ho chakkar mein Chinese navy + leadership k koi nahi hai takkar mein.........

  • @rushivyas3648
    @rushivyas3648 25 днів тому

    Can we use v22 osprey by converting it to AWACS???

  • @sudhir4274
    @sudhir4274 25 днів тому

    Does it's operational, Heard after launch it went for upgradtion.😢😢😢

  • @stevecrasto1054
    @stevecrasto1054 25 днів тому

    Jai hind sr

  • @Ashish-ip7kx
    @Ashish-ip7kx 25 днів тому

    Waiting for next video 📷📸

  • @user-km7is9yy3e
    @user-km7is9yy3e 25 днів тому

    Jai hind

  • @Challenging_bias
    @Challenging_bias 25 днів тому +1

    Within 6 years u will see fourth operational carrier

  • @irfan5336
    @irfan5336 14 днів тому +1

    See trail successful completed

  • @SpruceWood-NEG
    @SpruceWood-NEG 25 днів тому

    The 003 aircraft carrier is an experimental training ship. The combat capability is greater than the Eagle level and less than the Nimitz level. This aircraft carrier is just a part of the plan and has nothing to praise.

  • @EXPLORADVEN
    @EXPLORADVEN 25 днів тому

    🧐🧐🧐

  • @shubhamsaini4770
    @shubhamsaini4770 25 днів тому +2

    China has started buliding their 4th carrier

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 25 днів тому +1

      Incorrect.
      They are building twin carriers at once simultaneously.
      Type 004 and Type 005 are coming up in the next 4 years.

  • @aruunmenon
    @aruunmenon 25 днів тому +1

    All of this is valid IF this thing actually works, and that is a BIG IF.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 25 днів тому

      You must be pretty stupid to even think that a nation like China wastes so much resources, time and effort for IFs.

  • @rakesh9918
    @rakesh9918 25 днів тому

    INDIA DRDO SHOULD ALLOCATED MORE FUNDS FOR MORE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR FUTURISTIC WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT TO DEFEND INDIA AND ALSO TO INCREASE WEAPONS EXPORTS

  • @Shiva_kadam
    @Shiva_kadam 25 днів тому +1

    Sir aap google translator use karte ho kya?

    • @Arcticdawn1093
      @Arcticdawn1093 24 дні тому

      Kyu spasht Hindi ka prayog kar rehe hein bhawata is Karan vash aapko Aisa prateet ho raha hai?

  • @Rahul_sharma...
    @Rahul_sharma... 25 днів тому +1

    🙄 china usa ko takkar dene me hai
    Hm indians to bahot pichhe hain 🙁

  • @abhisekdas4605
    @abhisekdas4605 25 днів тому

    Like no 100, Jai Hind Jai Bharat 🙏🏻🇮🇳🙏🏽

  • @aryanrathod4064
    @aryanrathod4064 24 дні тому

    is this the ship that made up with the help of AI Technology ?

  • @priyeshrajguru3946
    @priyeshrajguru3946 25 днів тому

    Humare pass bhi capability or experience he Aircraft carrier bnane ka hum ek conventional propulsion ke sath Electromagnetic launch system vala Air Craft carrier bna sakte he pr ab ye indian navy ko sochna pdega ki use agla Aircraft carrier Nuclear fuel vala he chahiye ye zidd chorkar conventional Aircraft Carrier bnaye kyo ki indian Ocean me challanges bad rahe he .

    • @user-hu1tj6xu1h
      @user-hu1tj6xu1h 22 дні тому

      With India's industrial base to build large aircraft carriers especially electromagnetic catapults is still a dream, especially nuclear aircraft carriers, China is already building 004 and 005, at least one of which is nuclear powered.

    • @user-hu1tj6xu1h
      @user-hu1tj6xu1h 22 дні тому

      It takes India more than 10 years to build a 45,000-ton aircraft carrier and it is not national production.

  • @user-nl3kf4iw7x
    @user-nl3kf4iw7x 25 днів тому

    Why can't we make iac 2 which is repeat order of ins vikrant to be flat top . china also has conventional proportion we can further make development into it

  • @Bishal_Goswami
    @Bishal_Goswami 25 днів тому

    हमें अभी शब्द भेदी बाण कि गति से डोरना परेगा, नहीं तो लेने के देने पर जायेंगे।🥹

  • @Chingping9043
    @Chingping9043 25 днів тому

    sir, can Ins Vikrant be upgraded to catobar type carrier in the future, if necessary, by replacing the angle deck with the flat deck? Why is the Navy not interested in a steam-powered catapult system?

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 21 день тому

      It is not economical to use steam power system on middle carriers. Steam propulsion system is heavy and it takes lots of space. But as the replacement grows its advantage in potential of power expand and thermal efficiency will crush diesel or gas turbine.

  • @swankyorc9842
    @swankyorc9842 25 днів тому +1

    @AlphaDefenseHindi
    Why can't we use Tejas for Jaguar replacement as a Fighter Bomber?

    • @Cannoli_JJ
      @Cannoli_JJ 21 день тому

      🤣👉🇮🇳🤡

    • @swankyorc9842
      @swankyorc9842 16 днів тому

      @@Cannoli_JJ 🇨🇳👉🤥🤥🤥

  • @WhatThisVideo-WTv
    @WhatThisVideo-WTv 24 дні тому

    Nuclear propulsion ka sabse bada fayeda hota h electricity generation jo ki EMALS system me use hoti h jise conventional engines ko bnane me bohat problems aati hai.
    I highly doubt inka EMALS kitna effective hoga.

    • @averagestudent5223
      @averagestudent5223 23 дні тому

      we're still living in the 1990s stereotype ki Chinese hai tu kharab hai ... they literally have 4, 4+ and now 4++ and 5th gen indigenous fighters in production and total over 1000+. They have a domestic airliner, they have more ships than US navy and have a scary pace of developing new generation of aircraft carriers.... we should all not see facts but trust a youtube commenter like you...

    • @WhatThisVideo-WTv
      @WhatThisVideo-WTv 23 дні тому

      @@averagestudent5223 try searching for the research papers on EMALS and reading, uske baad baat krte hai.

    • @yudogcome5901
      @yudogcome5901 15 днів тому +1

      Electromagnetic catapults only require 27-31KWH to launch a 30-ton aircraft. The energy is not large. A 3MW generator can generate such power in 30 seconds. The key is how to use it in a short time.

  • @abhijeetbanerjee7649
    @abhijeetbanerjee7649 25 днів тому

    Nausena ke options honge Agni prime, brahmos ER, brahmos ng on aircrafts, SLCM.. and now the SMART too..😎 baki choti moti harrasments to Malacca strait par hoti rahengi mitro..😂

  • @rajasekarjayavel
    @rajasekarjayavel 25 днів тому

    Alpha defence: could you talk about radar of this carrier. It looks different. Why?

  • @gf-ek9ps
    @gf-ek9ps 25 днів тому

    Type 004 is under construction.

  • @bestvideoselected8362
    @bestvideoselected8362 25 днів тому +4

    Chinese piolet unable to land on carriers. 😅

    • @mogambogaming567
      @mogambogaming567 25 днів тому +1

      indian will keep living in their inflated ego while chinese are slowly taking over the world

    • @subasthapa4839
      @subasthapa4839 25 днів тому

      😒

    • @HashiramaSenyu
      @HashiramaSenyu 25 днів тому +5

      Yaas saar. Onli indea poojeet fiter poilets land on anything except the runway.

  • @dkq986
    @dkq986 25 днів тому

    Absolutely not needed. We need Vikrant class carriers. Oil tankers and AWACS roles can be performed by drones and CATS systems.
    What India needs the most is more missile carrying boats and submarines and our own marine engines.
    😢

  • @--PrathmeshHatolkar
    @--PrathmeshHatolkar 25 днів тому

    waiting for kaal 😅🤤

  • @ahamasmiarinm
    @ahamasmiarinm 25 днів тому

    Well, as far as IOR is concerned, I guess Bharat is already developing two unsinkable aircraft carriers, the Andamans and Lakshadweep. 😅🤣😂

  • @sudipmukherjee3204
    @sudipmukherjee3204 24 дні тому

    A conventional aircraft carrier cannot generate enough power to operate the catober system.Practically it's just a showpiece like other mean Chinese machines.

  • @bastabbiswas7734
    @bastabbiswas7734 25 днів тому

    18 trillion vs 4 trillion dollars economy.
    China is way ahead of us. We must do a "hard march" to catch up. We are on the right path, but need more speed, especially in taking decisions.

    • @subasthapa4839
      @subasthapa4839 25 днів тому +4

      21 trillion Vs 3.8 trillion economy

    • @yudogcome5901
      @yudogcome5901 15 днів тому

      China's actual production costs are lower than any other country, which will further widen the GDP gap

  • @vishaldeka5298
    @vishaldeka5298 25 днів тому

    You have to give China credit for their planning and vision. India cannot touch them in these areas.

  • @rakesh9918
    @rakesh9918 25 днів тому

    INDIA SHOULD REPLACE INDIA OLD FIGHTER PLANES AND REPLACE IT WITH MODREN FIGHTER JET WITH 4.5++ GENERATION

  • @subrataroy8133
    @subrataroy8133 25 днів тому +1

    Humare pas Mig21, hai.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Hum log agle 1million year Tak Mig21 hi service me rakhenge.
    AMCA zindagi me taiyar nahi hoga.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @tomcatkewell
      @tomcatkewell 17 днів тому

      Maybe can change into FTC-2000G, latest version of Mig-21 🤔

  • @VVVedic
    @VVVedic 25 днів тому +1

    तुम बस चंडीगढ़ इम्पोर्ट लॉबी की तरह ये नही चाहते कि,भारत मे रक्षा उपकरण का उत्पादन हो ।😑

  • @nrprabhu555
    @nrprabhu555 25 днів тому

    All the videos are of US carriers. China will use generative AI to create some videos for us.

  • @jainswarankit
    @jainswarankit 25 днів тому

    Chinese aircraft carrier are not more than a show piece made for power projection.
    But Bharat needs to make its navy, completely blue water navy.
    Bharat Mata ki Jay

  • @2MaulaJatt01
    @2MaulaJatt01 25 днів тому +1

    Bhai l&T ko aircraft carrier ka blue print banake dedo bus 3-5 saal me aircraft carrier khada kar denge

  • @dk1064
    @dk1064 25 днів тому

    No we indian chuper power

  • @moneyshman
    @moneyshman 25 днів тому

    If u hear the veterans from Indian navy u will understand that China faces real problem n manpower its middle range of hierarchy is always n question u can make hi-tech weapons but man behind machine is the most imp part of any armed force also here the machine quality will also n problem sir sorry to say but u must also speak about this and give holistic view instead of myopic view

  • @bluedevil8426
    @bluedevil8426 25 днів тому

    Chinese work on their project.. And we only talk on our project..

  • @durgeshpatil8936
    @durgeshpatil8936 25 днів тому

    building an aircraft carrier is not the "rocket science". we need at least 6 securing trilateral.

  • @user-su4th5lp6f
    @user-su4th5lp6f 25 днів тому

    Rafale will induct in Indian Navy in 2040 😅

  • @HC_15819
    @HC_15819 25 днів тому +4

    I totally support make in India and it will be unpopular opinion but right now, the quickest option is to buy the HMS Queen Elizabeth and a complement of F-35 as a counter to Fujian. Royal Navy is desperate to sell one of it brand new carriers because of the funding crunch and all this can be accomplished in a span of 2 years.

    • @dreamhunter2973
      @dreamhunter2973 25 днів тому

      That was a fake report. The Royal Navy itself Clarified that it was not selling any of the carriers. And even if they were willing to sell, the US won't sell us F 35s, as we have S 400 Triumph.

    • @averagestudent5223
      @averagestudent5223 23 дні тому

      need to go for it

    • @user-ni9mj1km5j
      @user-ni9mj1km5j 17 днів тому

      agree

  • @shubhams5455
    @shubhams5455 25 днів тому +3

    And this will accelerate the development of hypersonic missiles.
    Why? Because you simply have no option.

    • @S_K_J
      @S_K_J 25 днів тому

      HSTDV is already there just need to integrate it into missile system. I think they might be working on it in the background

  • @achyutgawade1668
    @achyutgawade1668 25 днів тому +2

    Where is tedbf no ccs approval yet 😢😢 we need to fast track tedbf

  • @AbhinandanSingh-ir6wz
    @AbhinandanSingh-ir6wz 25 днів тому +8

    Don't worry India have agniveers 💪

  • @007DevilDare
    @007DevilDare 25 днів тому +4

    Chinese carrier with cracked dake 🤔

    • @soulop8274
      @soulop8274 25 днів тому

      Wo repair hogaya

    • @dk1064
      @dk1064 25 днів тому

      Oh crack deck nehi hai .
      Oh oil te satalite picture asa lagta crack hai​@@soulop8274

  • @humblenesss
    @humblenesss 25 днів тому

    paise la khel hai bhai

  • @TheFreelancer007
    @TheFreelancer007 25 днів тому +5

    Type 001 had been declared training purpose ship and had engine issues with it.
    Type 002 is compelled to use old and obsolete tech carrier landing enabled aircrafts because its a ski jump aircraft carrier. Thus, it is likely to be used in a defensive role in South Indo Pacific region (so called South China Sea by China).
    Type 003 will be the only threatening development needs to be taken care of by Indian Navy.

    • @user-hu1tj6xu1h
      @user-hu1tj6xu1h 22 дні тому +2

      China is also building the 004 and 005, at least one of which is a 100,000-ton nuclear-powered carrier, and the 076.

  • @ankursingh1962
    @ankursingh1962 25 днів тому

    Why headache, isn't it quite obvious.
    It's like saying a significantly richer person buying another bmw, and you have just a scorpio. Why this weeping??

  • @dinbarful
    @dinbarful 25 днів тому

    big fan of your effort and look forward to your videos every couple of days. Jai Hind

  • @HimanshuSingh-og3zn
    @HimanshuSingh-og3zn 25 днів тому +2

    Jai Shree Radhe Krishna 🙏🙏🧡
    Jai Bharat Rashtra 🙏🙏🧡

  • @shubhams5455
    @shubhams5455 25 днів тому +2

    Pehli baat ye batao ki ye itne saare iits kis liye banaye gaye the, jake ek teacher banne ke liye kya for heavy engineering karne ke liye.

    • @Ashokkumar-ux6zv
      @Ashokkumar-ux6zv 25 днів тому +1

      America, UK, Erupe and Australia me padhe-likhe gulam and majdoor supply karne liye hai ye sare IIT pichchhle 70 sal se yahi kaam ho rha hai. aab to IIT apna parchar bhi ye hi bol ke kar rhi hai ki humare student ko itne core ka package mila hai videshi company me.

    • @Mihawk-zu9vy
      @Mihawk-zu9vy 25 днів тому

      Nahi tumne vote kis ko Diya tha bas khud ka kuch hua nahi toh IIT ko blame kar do abhi bhi 80 per cent se jyada research iit kar raha hai aur sun government ne r and d ka na budget is saal ghata diya hai aur iit hai hi kitne state 28 hai iit 23 aur kabhi private sector ko kiyo nahi kahte ho r and d ke liye ye reliance ,Mahindra ye khud ka kabhi kuch kiyo nahi banate bhai Maine toh kabhi nahi suna ki Tata ne koi 100 per cent indigenous vehicles banaya ho ya toh base vehicle drdo ka hota hai ya kisi foreign OEM ka bade aaye iit ko sawal karne kabhi govt ko bhi kar lo modi aur Congress dono hi soye hue the rafale ke baad bhi kisi ka order Dena tha Indian Navy 3 aircraft carrier chahti hai hum sirf do denge so called make in India ke liye beshak se time 7 saal jyada lag jaye duniya 5th gen operate kar Rahi hai hum abhi bhi 4.5 pe atke hue hai 40 f35 ya su 57 kharid lo for china but nahi hame toh amca hi chahiye chahe wo 2035 mein hi aaye usa mein private sector bhi risk leti hai but hamari private sector ko risk nahi lena isliye toh Tesla ko oppose kar rahe hai ye nahi Tesla jaisi hi koi car banaye

    • @Mihawk-zu9vy
      @Mihawk-zu9vy 25 днів тому

      Nahi tumne vote kis ko Diya tha bas khud ka kuch hua nahi toh IIT ko blame kar do abhi bhi 80 per cent se jyada research iit kar raha hai aur sun government ne r and d ka na budget is saal ghata diya hai aur iit hai hi kitne state 28 hai iit 23 aur kabhi private sector ko kiyo nahi kahte ho r and d ke liye ye reliance ,Mahindra ye khud ka kabhi kuch kiyo nahi banate bhai Maine toh kabhi nahi suna ki Tata ne koi 100 per cent indigenous vehicles banaya ho ya toh base vehicle drdo ka hota hai ya kisi foreign OEM ka bade aaye iit ko sawal karne kabhi govt ko bhi kar lo modi aur Congress dono hi soye hue the rafale ke baad bhi kisi ka order Dena tha Indian Navy 3 aircraft carrier chahti hai hum sirf do denge so called make in India ke liye beshak se time 7 saal jyada lag jaye duniya 5th gen operate kar Rahi hai hum abhi bhi 4.5 pe atke hue hai 40 f35 ya su 57 kharid lo for china but nahi hame toh amca hi chahiye chahe wo 2035 mein hi aaye usa mein private sector bhi risk leti hai but hamari private sector ko risk nahi lena isliye toh Tesla ko oppose kar rahe hai ye nahi Tesla jaisi hi koi car banaye

  • @chandrabahadurchauhan3732
    @chandrabahadurchauhan3732 25 днів тому

    Quality 😅

    • @Cannoli_JJ
      @Cannoli_JJ 21 день тому +5

      印度制造?🤣👉🇮🇳🤡

  • @BharathKumarThota-eg8jc
    @BharathKumarThota-eg8jc 25 днів тому

    As ususal chinese product..🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @bunnu2007
    @bunnu2007 25 днів тому

    What should I tell you now whereas you are defence anlyst and ex defence personel? India is very slow of because of our comparitatively small defence budget. Please dont shout much its going to deaf ears. Jai Hind. Thanks Bro. Good Night.

  • @junaid6829
    @junaid6829 23 дні тому

    What happened if russia silently give brahmos tech to china 😂😂
    This will be the biggest nightmare for indian navy.😂😂😂
    And Xian H20 is the biggest nightmare for rafale air bases 😂

    • @easonhuang7117
      @easonhuang7117 18 днів тому +1

      🤣Brahmos is merely Soviet 1980s P-800 tech. You think India will have something that leads the world? Not possible.

    • @isleephungry
      @isleephungry 16 днів тому +1

      China already has a missile very similar to Brahmos, its name is CX1😁

    • @huachen3836
      @huachen3836 13 днів тому +2

      How do you think we China needs a missile as rubbish as BrahMos?????🤣

  • @UppiliSridharan
    @UppiliSridharan 25 днів тому

    Dumb question. Why can you not take off with full weapon load off of a STOBAR with low fuel load and then do buddy- buddy refuelling? It's not an optimal solution but seems like it will bridge some gap to CATOBARs.

  • @sasankasasmal4676
    @sasankasasmal4676 25 днів тому +6

    India kuchh nahi kar sakta,only bad politics

    • @povlife7024
      @povlife7024 25 днів тому +3

      Na na bhai
      India App's ban krde ga
      and Kadi ninda kre ga

    • @gireeshkumar511
      @gireeshkumar511 25 днів тому +1

      Money matters

  • @rajarajendrarao8405
    @rajarajendrarao8405 25 днів тому

    Indian Navy will have a tough time in our Indian Ocean domain, yet our Indian Navy is more competent to handle the situation & Chinese domination in Indo Pacific & our East West & southern sea & our Indian Ocean.. Jai Hind ✊💪🚩🇮🇳

  • @Thomisshilbay
    @Thomisshilbay 25 днів тому

    Americans copy

  • @Ashokkumar-ux6zv
    @Ashokkumar-ux6zv 25 днів тому

    Bhai bura mat man na lekin tumhare har video me chinese ki badhi hoti hai or Bharat ki har mamle me galtiya nikalte rhate ho.

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  25 днів тому +1

      Well perception hai aapka!! Just that “Hum log china ko China ka maal ghatiya bol k discount nahi karte”.
      Else Tejas ki Tareef humse zyada koi nahi karta

    • @Ashokkumar-ux6zv
      @Ashokkumar-ux6zv 25 днів тому

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi ho sakta hai app ne ki ho but aapki lagbag video me maine ye note kiye hai. yha pe bat china ke maal ko ghatiya bolne ki nhi hai lekin India ke har kaam me kamiya nikal ke ek negative environment to banta hi hai.

  • @NA-di1oe
    @NA-di1oe 25 днів тому +5

    Why you Indian so feel proud??? I mean india 65% defence equipment from Russia, other 35% from Europe, US… even india didn’t invent one normal rifle gun… 😂

    • @hiteshrohra2991
      @hiteshrohra2991 25 днів тому

      Lol atleast there is a step in the direction not relying everything on your step father china 😂😂

    • @undertamker9606
      @undertamker9606 25 днів тому +2

      Ashirvaad chakki fresh atta chahiye kya

    • @subasthapa4839
      @subasthapa4839 25 днів тому

      Insas 2.0, Arjun MBT (new model), Tejas mk2, amca, brahmos, astra MK3 etc etc 🙄

    • @NA-di1oe
      @NA-di1oe 25 днів тому +2

      @@subasthapa4839all are made in Russia, Israel, France and US only assembled in India 😂

    • @undertamker9606
      @undertamker9606 25 днів тому

      @@NA-di1oe Pak wala kaam nhi hai ki junk fighter 17 blunder liya aur green paint karke made in Pak likh Diya

  • @piyushmoond6850
    @piyushmoond6850 25 днів тому

    Comparing the military capabilities as if we have the same defence budget

  • @snehasingh56
    @snehasingh56 25 днів тому

    Uss Nimitz class reverse engineering 😂

  • @Halz0holic
    @Halz0holic 25 днів тому +3

    आप देख रहे है अल्फा डिफेन्स, अल्फा डिफेन्स हिंदी में आपका स्वागत हैं

  • @baladkariallahrasoolno-bee5682
    @baladkariallahrasoolno-bee5682 25 днів тому +1

    Lets do some kadi Ninda or Bhatsana .....
    Not military structural Reforms or Tax Reforms ....
    Let government hold the PSU's and Public Chat Jai ho Modiji !
    There r thousands of Problems....
    Now lets go for Solution !
    Do Structural Reforms !
    Digitalize entire Currency driven Economy !
    Dedicate (0.1 percent of the Population) to Active Duty Force (who should always be on war in the frontiers like RR)
    Next the (0.2 percent of the population) Paramilitary forces !
    Then (0.7 percent of the population) on Reserve Military (mandatory free service for 2 consequtive years !
    Or else no further jobs or benefits to them ! )
    Dedicate 3 percent of GDP to Defense spending!
    Where 1 percent should be on salary ... And the rest 2 percent on New weapons Purchase Bill !
    NEXT ...
    (0.1 Percent ) Active soilders recieve 2 times the Per capita Income of Indian Economy !
    Next (0.2 percent) paramilitary should recieve the Half salary of Active Soilders !
    Next (0.7 percent) should only recieve pocket money ( one fourth money of Paramilitary) !
    Then see the magic of Indian Defense !

    • @hiteshrohra2991
      @hiteshrohra2991 25 днів тому

      The government is thibking about first three points as agniveer scheme was introduced for same reasons

  • @achyutgawade1668
    @achyutgawade1668 25 днів тому

    I m first 🎉 why the hell india don't have nuclear powered (engine)aircraft carrier???

  • @rakeshgogoi5158
    @rakeshgogoi5158 25 днів тому

    Koi fayda nahi 😂😂