This is one of the problems with private schools. The children grow up with a sense of entitlement and the teachers have a deferential attitude towards them because their parents pay out of pocket. They don't want to bite the hand that feeds them.
Private schools have been targeted by the far left fanatics for many decades be a they are free from the national curriculum of indoctrination. And the far left despise that fact.
@@wolfiestreet6899 you're living in a belief system of your own making. Step away from the keyboard a bit and take a walk in the real world. Parents are free to indoctrate their childhood any way they want. Private schools harm meritocracy. It's not about philosophies, it's about equality of opportunity. You don't don't have to be left, right up or down, or a keyboard warrior to support it.
@@imrannazir6931 There are more than enough state schools in the country- private schools are an additional, optional opportunity for those who have very intelligent children (even if they don’t have money, there are still available spaces due to bursaries). And before you become outraged at the notion that pupils at private schools are generally more intelligent, just look at average GCSE and A level grades for each school for the past 10 years.
I would also argue that private school teachers certainly do not have a ‘deferantial attitude’ towards their students- your contention is that private schools are superior to state schools and so they do not provide ‘equal opportunity’. If this is so, then the disciplinary aspect of education at private schools must also be much better than that of state schools and, hence, teachers cannot have these attitudes towards their pupils. You can’t have it both ways!!!!!
@@Cam-ej4ew Entry is by money not by intelligence, but i am aware that they do have a bar. They have higher grades because they have a better standard of education and tend to come from families who can afford money on private tutors and other resources. My contention is that if so many politicians and elites send their own to private schools then there is less will to improve state schools. I studied at university alongside many who were educated privately, they were certainly not the most intelligent, had higher confidence and walked into jobs upon graduation with lesser degrees even with little work experience due to their connections. I came in with poorer grades then them but in the level playing field we were in I gradually surpassed them. There private educations gave them their head starts but once we were in the same room it didn't matter.
Those testimonies were the more serious ones?LOL Imagine how ridiculous the ''not serious'' ones will be... If the sexes were reversed, it would be ''business as usual'' during any ''womens talk show'' bashing men on national TV.
id like to throw in a story , perhapes not the right place it involves thomas victor ocarroll a teacher at caludon coventry and his activaties at the school covered up by the school caludon castle and coventry council , all confirmed by the teacher in his own book paedohila the radical case but the police dont want to do anything
This is rubbish. Do your research into social media acceptance. Being overtly sexual = more likes. More likes = more popular. More popular = given life purpose.
So true! and it's not just explicit porn, it's all the sexualized imagery that people are bombarded with in movies, advertising, magazines etc - we live in a pornographic culture.
Wow, doesn't the uk have laws about this? If they don't then they should have stricter laws about sexual abuse.
This is one of the problems with private schools. The children grow up with a sense of entitlement and the teachers have a deferential attitude towards them because their parents pay out of pocket. They don't want to bite the hand that feeds them.
Private schools have been targeted by the far left fanatics for many decades be a they are free from the national curriculum of indoctrination. And the far left despise that fact.
@@wolfiestreet6899 you're living in a belief system of your own making. Step away from the keyboard a bit and take a walk in the real world. Parents are free to indoctrate their childhood any way they want. Private schools harm meritocracy. It's not about philosophies, it's about equality of opportunity. You don't don't have to be left, right up or down, or a keyboard warrior to support it.
@@imrannazir6931 There are more than enough state schools in the country- private schools are an additional, optional opportunity for those who have very intelligent children (even if they don’t have money, there are still available spaces due to bursaries). And before you become outraged at the notion that pupils at private schools are generally more intelligent, just look at average GCSE and A level grades for each school for the past 10 years.
I would also argue that private school teachers certainly do not have a ‘deferantial attitude’ towards their students- your contention is that private schools are superior to state schools and so they do not provide ‘equal opportunity’. If this is so, then the disciplinary aspect of education at private schools must also be much better than that of state schools and, hence, teachers cannot have these attitudes towards their pupils. You can’t have it both ways!!!!!
@@Cam-ej4ew Entry is by money not by intelligence, but i am aware that they do have a bar. They have higher grades because they have a better standard of education and tend to come from families who can afford money on private tutors and other resources. My contention is that if so many politicians and elites send their own to private schools then there is less will to improve state schools. I studied at university alongside many who were educated privately, they were certainly not the most intelligent, had higher confidence and walked into jobs upon graduation with lesser degrees even with little work experience due to their connections. I came in with poorer grades then them but in the level playing field we were in I gradually surpassed them. There private educations gave them their head starts but once we were in the same room it didn't matter.
Those testimonies were the more serious ones?LOL
Imagine how ridiculous the ''not serious'' ones will be...
If the sexes were reversed, it would be ''business as usual'' during any ''womens talk show'' bashing men on national TV.
id like to throw in a story , perhapes not the right place it involves thomas victor ocarroll a teacher at caludon coventry and his activaties at the school covered up by the school caludon castle and coventry council , all confirmed by the teacher in his own book paedohila the radical case but the police dont want to do anything
This is rubbish. Do your research into social media acceptance. Being overtly sexual = more likes. More likes = more popular. More popular = given life purpose.
Internet porn fueling it all. Plain and simple.
So true! and it's not just explicit porn, it's all the sexualized imagery that people are bombarded with in movies, advertising, magazines etc - we live in a pornographic culture.
"No."