fantastic explanation. this is beyond obvious to those of us who have experienced such a tragedy. the moral of the story is- ANY CHOICE IS BETTER THAN NO CHOICE. Akin to the notion of "a good man doing nothing". this poem makes me weep everytime i think of it. its tragically beautiful. just like humanity.
Hes in the woods, road splits into two paths.Looks down one. Takes the other which looks quite similar, but its claim on it being chosen in his mind relied on it being grassy and wanting wear. Now roads dont have minds or think, so the idea that he sees the road as wanting wear(to be walked on) is in my eyes almost as if its calling or beckoning him to come walk on it(life calling/fate/whatever).But the two paths are really almost identical in theory.He takes one with the happy though that hell give the other a try some other time, but knows in reality hell get caught up in his chosen path and where that leads that he most likely wont come back or revisit this fork. In the future he imagines telling this story of how he took the road less traveled. He says so, no matter how freaking similar he states that he took the one less traveled.But thats just an identifying factor, doesnt necessarily mean he took the hard road in life or any other crud.and regardless of whatever road he takes, itll make all the difference because no matter what decision you make in life it changes everything that comes after. Theres a difference no matter what. But i do believe that this is more of a idea about how you make decisions in life regardless big or small, but still wonder what might of come from picking another choice at any given moment.
I understand why one would be lead to that interpretation (in the video) but I disagree.. I often wonder why this poem is hugely misunderstood, to me it is as clear as day. If we carefully read it, we can see that a choice was made, here is why: "Two roads diverge in a yellow woods." - Initially we see an individual faced with two important choices and has a desire to explore both, But it is physically impossible to simultaneously do so, as he explains, "Sorry I could not travel both and be one traveler." After that we see the author considering long and hard about the two options before him, although initially he understood that there were no discernible differences between the paths(which made them equally attractive choices), but the more he thought, the more he saw nonexistent justifications as to why he should take the one over the the other (Indicative of human nature). Through those nonexistent justifications, a choice was made. But you can also see that the author had an idea of physically and temporarily exploring his first choice and then coming back to explore the other, but also understood that as he started exploring one he would never come back to explore the other as he will be curious as to how deep the rabbit hole goes - this is indicated in the lines, "Oh, I kept the first for another day! Yet knowing how way leads to way, I doubted if I should ever come back." the latter statement of the last quote also indicates a person who is already down a path and is conflicted if he should turn back to go explore the second choice. The last part of the poem is the actual embodiment of the tittle, "THE ROAD NOT TAKEN" or a summary of what the author had been saying - "I shall be telling this with a sigh somewhere ages and ages hence, two roads diverged in a wood and I took the one less traveled by." Taking a road less traveled by in this instance is not a statement of nonconformity but reference to how he made the first choice.. in that very manner you can also see that the author is still conflicted about the road he didn't take, which gives the poem an element of regret , but he is standing firm in his initial disillusioned justification for making a choice - the Bottom line is that, he is a conflicted individual who is asking, "What if I had taken the other option(THE ROAD NOT TAKEN)?"
Yes, it's clear that the narrator made a choice and took one of the very similar roads. Even the title tells us he took on road. His dilemma is that he couldnt take BOTH roads. And he knows later in life he will give this BS justification about what he road he took, and yet there is no WAY he could have known what difference the "road not taken" would have amounted to.
That's a nice peom. It made me to remember my college time but the situation is different I can understand completely now what is said:) Thanks for the analysis Ahmed, Cairo, Egypt
We made a choice and thereafter realized That it was not a better or worse choice; Yet somehow we have that gut feeling that The choice made a difference, that it had Somewhat changed us for the rest of our life.
I completely agree with you! The traveler studied one path for a while and then definitely took the second. It is unclear whether he studies the second path beforehand but that's not really important. The narrator of this video lost me when he claims the traveler is so indecisive that he takes neither. So what did he do, stand at the fork for days on end? Turn back? That makes no sense. I believe the poem is about the regret of never knowing whether the other path was ultimately better or worse than the path he chose so in his old age he plans to falsely justify his choice even though, at the time, the 2 paths were virtually identical. I'm guessing he plans to do this because it is such an important decision that he doesn't want to second guess himself years later which would drive him crazy.
"There are goods ( or roads in Frost's case) so opposed that we cannot seize (or walk) both, but by too much prudence (or contemplating in the case of Frost), We pass between them at too great a distance to reach either, This is often the fate of long consideration; he does nothing who endeavors to do more than is allowed to humaity." Samuel Johnson: from "Rasselas, The prince of Abissinia."
I watched you for Data Structures videos, I’ve been finished with English for a long time now, but I find this poem interesting. But I loved how you use the x = y logic. 😆😆😆😆😆
My mom doesnt believe this analysis and it could be wrong or true . But if we're going in that direction. ... my mom like.. but it says "and I - I took the road less traveled by" indicating that he had to take a road . BUT WHAT IFFFF . The road that was less traveled by was when he turned around and decided not to take that road ? Or nah ..
Thank you so much for sharing this analysis. I think it highlights why this has been a classic poem to use to assist learning how to interpret and showcase the succinct meaningfulness of prose writing, especially by Robert Frost. But of course the complexity of an explanation for this prose writing is more complex than the metaphoric imagery expressed in the poem itself, don't you think?
But it does seem that the author of that poem analysis seizes well the central idea that "there is a fear of regret of not succeeding in making the choice of a path less traveled, and in fact not making a choice at all," as they demonstrated mathematically, which is a tragedy. I don't know if this a psychoanalytic form of analysis, or just an offshoot of it, but I think whatever reason it has an effect, that it is a powerful poem.
You are incorrect, if you read the poem Frost says, "Though as for that the passing there, had worn them really about the same." Meaning that both roads were in fact the same, redundant, inconsequential route at the time of his choosing. It is about the regret of missing out of the other road, which is what the author of this video points out.
i think he did take a road beaucse he says then took the other, as just as fair and haveing peeeerhaps the better claim beaucse it was grassy and wanted wear the road he just came along must have been worn beacuse he just walked on it ???
I have to disagree wholly with your analysis here. Poems are very subjective in the first place. I believe this poem has more about Frost's choice to become a writer and not take the standard career path that was offered him. Autumn has no meaning of death at all. It's just an evocative imagery. Why would he be saying in the poem that he will be telling this to people ages and ages hence if he was at the end? I think what you're doing is over analyzing something with a more simplistic meaning.
Wow this poem just made me start thinking hard about life.. and some decisions I need to make, I want to make but I don't know which road to take. My choices are take the new road or continue down this road, so the new road would be the less traveled one. But I can't come back to the other road after. So I am not sure what my decision will bring, happiness which I think it will, or just change everything for the worse..
It is a satire he is making fun of a friend,one Thomas Edwards he use to go walking with , who went on and on about the road they didn't take Frost said so in a letter he wrote.
i think he said that one road looked like it had more grass and nobody gad stepped on it and want it wear and then he said" i i took the one less traveled by" doesnt that mean he took that one?
To be honest, I think this poem is about when someone comes to a choice in their life like what career to take. It was grassy and wanted wear because not many people had gone down that path in life for example, priesthood. And telling this with a sigh ages and ages hence, two roads diverged in a wood and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference. I think this poem is about going down the religious career choice because not many people go down that road in life.
Most of your analysis is good, but he did decide on a road. "The Road Not Taken" is the road is the life choices that he wish he made, but didn't. Frost is talking about human nature and how people tend to make their life seem more important than they really are to help their ego when in actuality they are full of regrets. His sigh in the end indicates his regrets.
I believe that is a very under-read interpretation of this poem, as backed up by all the examples given by xoax, and my English teacher agrees; however, as no meaning was given by frost himself, this poem can, of course be taken in any way, even the most literal way that he was in a forest and took a path that wasn't quite as taken and it could well be correct.
At the time they were the same to HIM, whether they were really the same or not. He does not regret it at the time of his choosing of the road he takes, but it is later in his life that he regrets not revisiting the path he did not travel.
my interpretation: he regretted going to the woods he should have kept his life in the city where there are many roads to life of hapiness... the first step he made going to the woods is the biggest mistake in his life for whatever road he took the ending is still a sigh... : > )
to my understanding, he took the road less traveled by, and ill give an example in real life alot of people will do "mainstream" things, and want to do them because other people are doing them, while other chose their own path because it has more real meaning to themself so what he is saying is he took the road wich has more meaning, then the road wich is more popular thats my understanding, my FIRST poem ever read so i may be wrong, im trying to get into reading this type of stuff though.
The poem says the roads were equal, so there is no road fewer people have taken. The roads were the same, but he is trying to convince himself he took a road less traveled.
"Because it was grassy and wanted wear." Yes, there WAS difference, apparently the poster was not listening. Fear!!!!!!!!! Not at all. Poster seems to be putting his own thoughts and FEARS into his analysis. Yellow? Cowardice? You are so deep in your own self that well, let me not speculate like YOU HAVE! I have been to over 70 countries. I am offended by by your analysis. I have never posted before but you pissed me off royally!!! (BTW I do live in Silicon Valley and am a computer consultant.)
Or "He does nothing---who does nothing at all; who, out of the fear of regret of making the bad choice or wrong decision, fails to do anything and remains irresolute.
As commentary is cheap, it should be a criminal offense for a poet or author to fail to state clearly the meaning of his work. Around the 04:00 mark, the analyst calls the use of "shall" 'archaic'... the poem was written 100 years ago: at that time "I shall" was the standard use, and "I will"would have been considered wrong. (Even today, we can discern a difference...)
Your point is perhaps supported in that "I shall" occurs 11 times in the book 'The Poems of Robert Frost' and "I will" 8 times. I haven't gone through every occurrence but the use here of 'shall' is perhaps used for assonance and alliteration: look at 'sigh,', 'somewhere', the s- sound in 'ages' and 'ages' and in 'hence'. Regarding the latter/last Frost uses 'hence' in 4 times in his poems.
@@r-a-c-h-e-l *Ahem* I am making social commentary on the fact that some people would rather point out the inconsequential mistakes make as their interlocutor makes their argument as opposed to countering the point itself. A common example of said inconsequential mistakes is the misuse of a pronoun, as was displayed is the original post in the sentence "As commentary is cheap, it should be a criminal offense for a poet or author to fail to state clearly the meaning of HIS work", his being the offending word. The commentary being made here is done employing satire, mimicking the inanities of a person who would be offended by such minutia as a misused pronoun. Ultimately, as it needs to be explained word for word, it is stupid that a person would be so insecure about their own intelligence that, instead of conceding a point to their interlocutor, they would attack their character, both a logical fallacy and an embarrassing sight, and this is displayed using both the font and a lack of spaces, to show that the character I was playing was mindless and enraged.
fantastic explanation. this is beyond obvious to those of us who have experienced such a tragedy. the moral of the story is- ANY CHOICE IS BETTER THAN NO CHOICE. Akin to the notion of "a good man doing nothing". this poem makes me weep everytime i think of it. its tragically beautiful. just like humanity.
❤
And for saying that, I love you. I really do. I wish I could cry with you listening to that poem.
Who else is here from online school?
Me lol
Me: Laughs from the future
@@jazmineee9683 me: Laughs from the past
And now is me
Best analysis of this poem on UA-cam! Bravo good sir, bravo.
Its all fun and games until he puts math into it.
Hes in the woods, road splits into two paths.Looks down one. Takes the other which looks quite similar, but its claim on it being chosen in his mind relied on it being grassy and wanting wear. Now roads dont have minds or think, so the idea that he sees the road as wanting wear(to be walked on) is in my eyes almost as if its calling or beckoning him to come walk on it(life calling/fate/whatever).But the two paths are really almost identical in theory.He takes one with the happy though that hell give the other a try some other time, but knows in reality hell get caught up in his chosen path and where that leads that he most likely wont come back or revisit this fork. In the future he imagines telling this story of how he took the road less traveled. He says so, no matter how freaking similar he states that he took the one less traveled.But thats just an identifying factor, doesnt necessarily mean he took the hard road in life or any other crud.and regardless of whatever road he takes, itll make all the difference because no matter what decision you make in life it changes everything that comes after. Theres a difference no matter what. But i do believe that this is more of a idea about how you make decisions in life regardless big or small, but still wonder what might of come from picking another choice at any given moment.
BillyShakesWorld thank you
There's not ONE interpretation of the poem, there's several, and as long as they relly on the text, it's ok :)
Right, and I mean, yes, the poem makes it clear CONTRA this video, that the narrator made a choice.
BRILLIANTLY PLANNED . VERY GOOD ANALYSIS! IT'S ALL ABOUT MAKING CHOICE IN ONE'S LIFE . WHEN ONE IS CONFUSED WHICH PATH IS THE BEST TO OPT.
Oh thanks a million times.................. I needed it for my exam the day after tomorrow....... You just helped me.... God bless you abundantly....
I understand why one would be lead to that interpretation (in the video) but I disagree.. I often wonder why this poem is hugely misunderstood, to me it is as clear as day. If we carefully read it, we can see that a choice was made, here is why:
"Two roads diverge in a yellow woods." - Initially we see an individual faced with two important choices and has a desire to explore both, But it is physically impossible to simultaneously do so, as he explains, "Sorry I could not travel both and be one traveler." After that we see the author considering long and hard about the two options before him, although initially he understood that there were no discernible differences between the paths(which made them equally attractive choices), but the more he thought, the more he saw nonexistent justifications as to why he should take the one over the the other (Indicative of human nature). Through those nonexistent justifications, a choice was made. But you can also see that the author had an idea of physically and temporarily exploring his first choice and then coming back to explore the other, but also understood that as he started exploring one he would never come back to explore the other as he will be curious as to how deep the rabbit hole goes - this is indicated in the lines, "Oh, I kept the first for another day! Yet knowing how way leads to way, I doubted if I should ever come back." the latter statement of the last quote also indicates a person who is already down a path and is conflicted if he should turn back to go explore the second choice. The last part of the poem is the actual embodiment of the tittle, "THE ROAD NOT TAKEN" or a summary of what the author had been saying - "I shall be telling this with a sigh somewhere ages and ages hence, two roads diverged in a wood and I took the one less traveled by." Taking a road less traveled by in this instance is not a statement of nonconformity but reference to how he made the first choice.. in that very manner you can also see that the author is still conflicted about the road he didn't take, which gives the poem an element of regret , but he is standing firm in his initial disillusioned justification for making a choice - the Bottom line is that, he is a conflicted individual who is asking, "What if I had taken the other option(THE ROAD NOT TAKEN)?"
Yes, it's clear that the narrator made a choice and took one of the very similar roads. Even the title tells us he took on road. His dilemma is that he couldnt take BOTH roads. And he knows later in life he will give this BS justification about what he road he took, and yet there is no WAY he could have known what difference the "road not taken" would have amounted to.
That's a nice peom. It made me to remember my college time but the situation is different I can understand completely now what is said:)
Thanks for the analysis
Ahmed, Cairo, Egypt
We made a choice and thereafter realized
That it was not a better or worse choice;
Yet somehow we have that gut feeling that
The choice made a difference, that it had
Somewhat changed us for the rest of our life.
I am learning about this poem in my AP lit class! This was extremely helpful! Thank you!
It's kinda funny when someone explains a poem with "if x
Thank you for letting me know
It is difficult to agree that no choice was taken.
The poem clearly states that he took the second, and kept the first for another day.
I completely agree with you! The traveler studied one path for a while and then definitely took the second. It is unclear whether he studies the second path beforehand but that's not really important. The narrator of this video lost me when he claims the traveler is so indecisive that he takes neither. So what did he do, stand at the fork for days on end? Turn back? That makes no sense. I believe the poem is about the regret of never knowing whether the other path was ultimately better or worse than the path he chose so in his old age he plans to falsely justify his choice even though, at the time, the 2 paths were virtually identical. I'm guessing he plans to do this because it is such an important decision that he doesn't want to second guess himself years later which would drive him crazy.
math is everywhere to haunt me
"There are goods ( or roads in Frost's case) so opposed that we cannot seize (or walk) both, but by too much prudence (or contemplating in the case of Frost), We pass between them at too great a distance to reach either, This is often the fate of long consideration; he does nothing who endeavors to do more than is allowed to humaity."
Samuel Johnson: from "Rasselas, The prince of Abissinia."
This is a great poem that im studying in school
Great Job Sir,
loved the explanation. :)
Best explanation of this poem
Very good analysis!
What a good explanation
I watched you for Data Structures videos, I’ve been finished with English for a long time now, but I find this poem interesting. But I loved how you use the x = y logic. 😆😆😆😆😆
giving me another dimension of understanding,, tnx bro
As a poet I can say this wood
is a wood but not Frost's
wood of yellow~
I ponder what he would say
if Frost were today a live fellow!
It will help me to get good marks in my unit test.
A great thanks
My mom doesnt believe this analysis and it could be wrong or true . But if we're going in that direction. ... my mom like.. but it says "and I - I took the road less traveled by" indicating that he had to take a road . BUT WHAT IFFFF . The road that was less traveled by was when he turned around and decided not to take that road ? Or nah ..
That can't be true ? Link?
the poem is meant to be read back-words.
Thank you so much for sharing this analysis. I think it highlights why this has been a classic poem to use to assist learning how to interpret and showcase the succinct meaningfulness of prose writing, especially by Robert Frost. But of course the complexity of an explanation for this prose writing is more complex than the metaphoric imagery expressed in the poem itself, don't you think?
But it does seem that the author of that poem analysis seizes well the central idea that "there is a fear of regret of not succeeding in making the choice of a path less traveled, and in fact not making a choice at all," as they demonstrated mathematically, which is a tragedy. I don't know if this a psychoanalytic form of analysis, or just an offshoot of it, but I think whatever reason it has an effect, that it is a powerful poem.
please wolud you do an analysis of The poem "what is life ?" by John Clare Clare
Great job!
You are incorrect, if you read the poem Frost says, "Though as for that the passing there, had worn them really about the same." Meaning that both roads were in fact the same, redundant, inconsequential route at the time of his choosing. It is about the regret of missing out of the other road, which is what the author of this video points out.
what i understand is that the poet lamented about the choice he made- not taken the road"...
i think he did take a road beaucse he says
then took the other, as just as fair
and haveing peeeerhaps the better claim
beaucse it was grassy and wanted wear
the road he just came along must have been worn beacuse he just walked on it ???
Exactly, He did make a choice and take a road. Even the title shows this, although it mentions the road he didn't take.
I love the background song😍
I have to disagree wholly with your analysis here. Poems are very subjective in the first place. I believe this poem has more about Frost's choice to become a writer and not take the standard career path that was offered him. Autumn has no meaning of death at all. It's just an evocative imagery. Why would he be saying in the poem that he will be telling this to people ages and ages hence if he was at the end? I think what you're doing is over analyzing something with a more simplistic meaning.
nice video and very information video
Thank you
I can't get through the intro music without giggling just a little bit.
If both roads are the same , why regret not taking the other? If they're the same you aren't missing much.
this was an unseen poem in my exam, i hope i wrote the right stuff...
Wow this poem just made me start thinking hard about life.. and some decisions I need to make, I want to make but I don't know which road to take. My choices are take the new road or continue down this road, so the new road would be the less traveled one. But I can't come back to the other road after. So I am not sure what my decision will bring, happiness which I think it will, or just change everything for the worse..
+8Baller1000 thanks the paragraph u wrote help me in the h.w answer
+Cyber _Tubing lol really? :-)
+Cyber _Tubing if I told you what I was talking about I don't think you would've used it
i used it on my test and it was correct
Cyber _Tubing thats awesome!! Making me feel good n shit lol
It is a satire he is making fun of a friend,one Thomas Edwards he use to go walking with , who went on and on about the road they didn't take Frost said so in a letter he wrote.
I just felt stupid that I didn’t realize yellow wood = fall
i think he said that one road looked like it had more grass and nobody gad stepped on it and want it wear and then he said" i i took the one less traveled by" doesnt that mean he took that one?
To be honest, I think this poem is about when someone comes to a choice in their life like what career to take. It was grassy and wanted wear because not many people had gone down that path in life for example, priesthood. And telling this with a sigh ages and ages hence, two roads diverged in a wood and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference. I think this poem is about going down the religious career choice because not many people go down that road in life.
Where did you get the religious career aspect?
Lol?
Joel Baxter it is except for the religous part
that's so helpful thanks!
Most of your analysis is good, but he did decide on a road. "The Road Not Taken" is the road is the life choices that he wish he made, but didn't. Frost is talking about human nature and how people tend to make their life seem more important than they really are to help their ego when in actuality they are full of regrets. His sigh in the end indicates his regrets.
the whole poem was literally just a joke to mess with his friend
I believe that is a very under-read interpretation of this poem, as backed up by all the examples given by xoax, and my English teacher agrees; however, as no meaning was given by frost himself, this poem can, of course be taken in any way, even the most literal way that he was in a forest and took a path that wasn't quite as taken and it could well be correct.
At the time they were the same to HIM, whether they were really the same or not. He does not regret it at the time of his choosing of the road he takes, but it is later in his life that he regrets not revisiting the path he did not travel.
Very useful
@MrKevincito nevermind i see where he say the had wor about the same
Archie Andrews fave poem
thks. now i understand
my interpretation: he regretted going to the woods he should have kept his life in the city where there are many roads to life of hapiness... the first step he made going to the woods is the biggest mistake in his life for whatever road he took the ending is still a sigh... : > )
@mojacherox Yeah that's what I heard
your english teacher is entitled to his/her personal interpretation, but if i were you, id take him/her with grain of salt from here on out. :/
Blew it Made all the difference.
Great analysis. Makes me feel like a dope as I always thought of the poem as a peon to individuality. OPPS my bad!
Thumbs up if Mr. Shakely brought you here!
sorry buddy
to my understanding, he took the road less traveled by, and ill give an example in real life
alot of people will do "mainstream" things, and want to do them because other people are doing them, while other chose their own path because it has more real meaning to themself
so what he is saying is he took the road wich has more meaning, then the road wich is more popular
thats my understanding, my FIRST poem ever read so i may be wrong, im trying to get into reading this type of stuff though.
wait so which road did he take? I assume he didn't take any because the poem i feel was not based of a true event.
so what is the main theme in the poem?
I don't agree; I think he did take the road less traveled.
4:34 travelled*
who watching in 2017
But you explained it well so its okay :D
it help me under stand the movie
Actually there was a video analysis (lol), not movie, I must stop writing quips on UA-cam late at night while working.
I disagree. The Road Not Taken is the road fewer people have taken; not the speaker.
The poem says the roads were equal, so there is no road fewer people have taken. The roads were the same, but he is trying to convince himself he took a road less traveled.
"Because it was grassy and wanted wear."
Yes, there WAS difference, apparently the poster was not listening.
Fear!!!!!!!!! Not at all.
Poster seems to be putting his own thoughts and FEARS into his analysis.
Yellow? Cowardice? You are so deep in your own self that well, let me not speculate like YOU HAVE! I have been to over 70 countries. I am offended by by your analysis.
I have never posted before but you pissed me off royally!!!
(BTW I do live in Silicon Valley and am a computer consultant.)
but he said and both that morning equally lay
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the sameThere WASNT a difference.
That background music thoooo....lol
Hannah Liz darude - sandstorm
hiiii
Or "He does nothing---who does nothing at all; who, out of the fear of regret of making the bad choice or wrong decision, fails to do anything and remains irresolute.
henlo munsci
No he takes the one that most people don't usually take.
As commentary is cheap, it should be a criminal offense for a poet or author to fail to state clearly the meaning of his work.
Around the 04:00 mark, the analyst calls the use of "shall" 'archaic'... the poem was written 100 years ago: at that time "I shall" was the standard use, and "I will"would have been considered wrong. (Even today, we can discern a difference...)
Your point is perhaps supported in that "I shall" occurs 11 times in the book 'The Poems of Robert Frost' and "I will" 8 times. I haven't gone through every occurrence but the use here of 'shall' is perhaps used for assonance and alliteration: look at 'sigh,', 'somewhere', the s- sound in 'ages' and 'ages' and in 'hence'. Regarding the latter/last Frost uses 'hence' in 4 times in his poems.
SOYOU'REASSUMINGALLPOETSANDAUTHORSHAVETOBEMALE!?
@@elispangler812 what?
@@r-a-c-h-e-l
*Ahem*
I am making social commentary on the fact that some people would rather point out the inconsequential mistakes make as their interlocutor makes their argument as opposed to countering the point itself.
A common example of said inconsequential mistakes is the misuse of a pronoun, as was displayed is the original post in the sentence "As commentary is cheap, it should be a criminal offense for a poet or author to fail to state clearly the meaning of HIS work", his being the offending word.
The commentary being made here is done employing satire, mimicking the inanities of a person who would be offended by such minutia as a misused pronoun.
Ultimately, as it needs to be explained word for word, it is stupid that a person would be so insecure about their own intelligence that, instead of conceding a point to their interlocutor, they would attack their character, both a logical fallacy and an embarrassing sight, and this is displayed using both the font and a lack of spaces, to show that the character I was playing was mindless and enraged.
nice
Anyone here for COVID 19 online school?
f o boil
who thought it would be a good idea to add maths into peoms smh
.
100th comment