Criminal Law - Elements of an Offence

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • GET THE MINI COURSE FOR $9 - go.thelawsimpl...
    For Private Tutoring: wa.me/94777037245
    Get Access to Courses & Webinars from $31/Month - go.thelawsimpl...
    SQE Prep Masterclass - go.thelawsimpl...
    SQE Prep for FLK1 - go.thelawsimpl...
    SQE Prep for FLK2 - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get FREE Criminal Law Books - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get the Comprehensive Lesson & Workshop for $29 -
    Homicide - go.thelawsimpl...
    Non-Fatal Offences - go.thelawsimpl...
    Theft & Fraud - go.thelawsimpl...
    Sexual Offences - go.thelawsimpl...
    How To Write First Class Answers: go.thelawsimpl...
    Join the WhatsApp Community - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get Access to Pre-Recorded Masterclasses, Courses & Webinars from $39/Month - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get The Spider Graphs for $3 - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get the Case Summaries for $5 - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get the Reference Q&A for $7 - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get the Mini Course for $9 - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get the Pre-Recorded Masterclass for $99 - go.thelawsimpl...
    Get the Complete Masterclass! - go.thelawsimpl...
    NEW! Criminal Law on Kindle - bit.ly/Criminal...
    Recommended Reading:
    Q&A Criminal Law by Norman Baird (Kindle Edition) - amzn.to/2gKV2YZ
    Q&A Criminal Law by Norman Baird (Paperback Edition) - amzn.to/2fmeiLQ
    Smith & Hogan's Criminal Law by David Ormerod and Karl Laird - amzn.to/2gtzpfc
    Buy Hold Me In Contempt: A Memoir by Dr. Shirani A. Bandaranayake
    bit.ly/HoldMeIn...
    Get the Spider Graphs for $3!:
    Criminal Law: bit.ly/Criminal...
    Contract Law: bit.ly/Contract...
    Public Law: bit.ly/PublicLa...
    Tort Law: bit.ly/TortLawS...
    Property Law: bit.ly/Property...
    Trust Law: bit.ly/TrustLaw...
    Get the Case Summaries for $5!:
    Criminal Law: bit.ly/Criminal...
    Contract Law: bit.ly/Contract...
    Public Law: bit.ly/PublicCa...
    Tort Law: bit.ly/TortCase...
    Trust Law: bit.ly/TrustCas...
    Property Law: bit.ly/Property...
    For complete courses, including Spider Graphs and Case Summaries for $10:
    English Legal System: www.udemy.com/l...
    Criminal Law: go.thelawsimpl...
    Contract Law: go.thelawsimpl...
    Constitutional Law: go.thelawsimpl...
    Property Law: go.thelawsimpl...
    Tort Law:go.thelawsimpl...
    Trust Law: go.thelawsimpl...
    Intellectual Property: go.thelawsimpl...
    Jurisprudence: go.thelawsimpl...
    Commercial Law: go.thelawsimpl...
    Company Law: go.thelawsimpl...
    Conflict of Laws: goo.gl/TVzZmj
    History of English Law: goo.gl/A22PDL
    GET ALL COURSES FOR $69!
    go.thelawsimpl...
    Pre-Recorded One-On-One Sessions for $99:
    Criminal Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Contract Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Public Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Legal System - go.thelawsimpl...
    Tort Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Trust Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Property Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Jurisprudence - go.thelawsimpl...
    Pre-Recorded Complete Masterclasses for $199:
    Criminal Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Contract Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Public Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Legal Systems - go.thelawsimpl...
    Tort Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Trust Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Property Law - go.thelawsimpl...
    Jurisprudence - go.thelawsimpl...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 49

  • @cormacboylan4937
    @cormacboylan4937 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you, this has simplified the points our lecturers should have so well.

  • @abdavis7214
    @abdavis7214 2 роки тому +1

    His description is full of money 💰 🤑

  • @huckfin8666
    @huckfin8666 8 років тому +4

    Fishing without a license,what facts/evidence would you rely to prove the codes apply to me don't you have to prove the code applies to me first before you can charge me with violating the code? just asking

    • @freetarian
      @freetarian 7 років тому

      Huck Fin Ahhhjh.....a Lysander Spooner fan I see....Haha Haha....same here my friend. I doubt you will get an answer.

    • @1infamous9
      @1infamous9 5 років тому

      The fact that you were caught fishing without a license?

  • @taketen1990
    @taketen1990 4 роки тому +1

    Prevention of Sexual Assault, Mandatory Classes, for boys 6th thru 12th, grade!!!!!

  • @osamashaaban2971
    @osamashaaban2971 5 років тому +7

    Thank you so much. You simplified a complex area of law in a very understandable way!

  • @s.f1439
    @s.f1439 4 роки тому +3

    So proud to be 🇱🇰🙌

  • @AMiah-jz8uu
    @AMiah-jz8uu 3 роки тому +1

    Actus reus + no mens rea) = can convict via strict liability. Would this include omission, possession and situational crimes?

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  3 роки тому +1

      Yes. The attributes of each offense remains the same. In other words, it will always be a combination of requirements between actus reus and mens rea.

  • @simakhatri3102
    @simakhatri3102 Рік тому +1

    Thank you sir for information

  • @sheraman8379
    @sheraman8379 4 роки тому

    5 elements of Crime on Finger's tips, plz watch Sher Aman Law Classes- "Five Elements of Crime"

  • @jessebrettjames
    @jessebrettjames 4 роки тому +3

    Actually, technically there exists an exception to your formula and that is in the case of inchoate crime, such as attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation. In all these (Mens Rea) cases the actual physical component (actus reus) has not been carried out, but as they are related to a substantive crime, they are therefore indictable offenses under the law.

    • @jess142
      @jess142 Рік тому +1

      He mentioned inchoate crimes in the video

  • @LiveitupwithOmer
    @LiveitupwithOmer 4 роки тому

    These are not the elements of criminal law these are the elements of crime.. Dont propage wrong information

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  4 роки тому +1

      Hi Umer. The title of the video is ‘Elements of an Offence”.

  • @stevevoyles3816
    @stevevoyles3816 3 роки тому

    Remember you are guilty untill proven innocent..

  • @drjmapple5510
    @drjmapple5510 2 роки тому

    How do you go about discovering mens rea?

  • @santoshsinghsingh3645
    @santoshsinghsingh3645 3 роки тому

    Nice explanation
    Text should be used deep ink
    Thanks

  • @sabakhelashvili3124
    @sabakhelashvili3124 4 роки тому

    1. conduct; 2. wrongfulness 3. fault

  • @calvinpallangyo6639
    @calvinpallangyo6639 2 роки тому

    can yoy help us with commonlaw cases

  • @santoshsinghsingh3645
    @santoshsinghsingh3645 3 роки тому

    Not clearly visible thanks

  • @prontotherapper
    @prontotherapper 2 роки тому +1

    🙏🏽🙏🏽

  • @user-xg2dk7ff2k
    @user-xg2dk7ff2k 7 років тому +1

    way too fast for me.

  • @AMiah-jz8uu
    @AMiah-jz8uu 3 роки тому

    What do you mean by crime proper?

  • @santoshsinghsingh3645
    @santoshsinghsingh3645 3 роки тому

    Super lecture sir thanks

  • @junehaugen7394
    @junehaugen7394 4 роки тому

    First of all, thank you for these videos! I was just wondering, in one slide you mention that actus reus and mens rea both have to occur, but in another you mention that there can be a conviction when there is an actus reus even though there is no mens rea. How does that make sense?

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  4 роки тому +3

      Hi June. I’m glad these lessons have been helpful. Yes, whatever the offence my be, the elements will always be made up of the actus reus and the mens rea. However, the requisite of some offences may not need a mens rea to be present in order to be charged. For example, strict liability offences (where the commision of the offence itself is sufficient. You need not intend or have the knowledge to the fact). A good example would be a traffic offence or selling of adulterated food in a shop.

  • @lancefairbank3311
    @lancefairbank3311 5 років тому

    so a person can have an intent to kill someone and not actually kill them and not be convicted?

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  5 років тому

      Hi Lawrence. The absence of the actus reus or the physical act would negate any criminal liability. The mere 'intent' alone is insufficient to attract criminal liability, unless the defendant has gone so close to the actually commission of the physical act that it would be 'more than merely preparatory', thus establishing an 'attempt'.

  • @juliusochieng3302
    @juliusochieng3302 3 роки тому

    A good insight

  • @lehlohonoloweymers
    @lehlohonoloweymers 4 роки тому

    Thanks a lot!

  • @careair5516
    @careair5516 6 років тому

    Can a person representing an organization be sued for criminal offense due to a negligence of official duty on the part of the person? How is the evidence found?

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  6 років тому

      I believe that liability would fall within the ambit or Tort as opposed to Criminality.

    • @khalbello8394
      @khalbello8394 5 років тому

      I believe that would fall under Corporate Criminal Liability

    • @btrix1968
      @btrix1968 Рік тому

      It’s called “Moral Person’s Criminal Responsibility or Corporate Criminal Responsibility”:
      Many offenses in this context are committed by group/individual in the framework of enterprises acting as moral person(s).
      The organization will be held liable for offenses committed on their behalf by their representative(s).
      It’s important to note that the criminal liability of the organization with legal personality does not exclude the criminal liability of the representative, those who hold leadership posts or their co-offenders and accomplices.
      Such criminal liability is established when the offender(s) acted by virtue of: 1. Power of representation, 2. Decision- making power, 3. Power of supervision, etc.

  • @beatzzz01
    @beatzzz01 9 років тому +2

    At 4:30, The slide said that there can be no conviction if the "actus reus" is missing from the offence element. What I would like to know is, isn't that a complete contradiction to what happens in the case of a 'conspiracy' charge? Please clarify.

    • @TheLawSimplified
      @TheLawSimplified  9 років тому +7

      trump Hi. The actus reus is the physical act. For example, a person can be charged even for an inchoate offense or an attempt of a crime, if the 'actions' he has taken is more than preparatory. The same would apply for conspiracy. The actus reus is considered broadly here. Hope this clarifies it :)

  • @thasnimns8576
    @thasnimns8576 5 років тому

    This vedeo is alright.

  • @nishantkumar5741
    @nishantkumar5741 8 років тому

    thank you

  • @misheckchagadama2686
    @misheckchagadama2686 4 роки тому

    With the aid of relevant authorities, explain in detail the components of an offence

  • @bonniebachana5565
    @bonniebachana5565 5 років тому +1

    This is beautiful