Josephine Teo apologises over anxiety caused by unmasking of NRIC numbers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @dd-dd2co
    @dd-dd2co 4 дні тому +18

    We don't want your apology, we want your resignation!

    • @Hs5687
      @Hs5687 10 хвилин тому

      Own Goal Season… Reeks of Coalition Government Underway…

  • @michael8372
    @michael8372 3 дні тому +4

    ACRA may have violated PDPA. The Minister for Law and Home Affairs should address this issue in parliament.

    • @jasminewong9023
      @jasminewong9023 День тому

      If ACRA really violated, there would be legal action and sacking. So, where is it?

    • @michael8372
      @michael8372 День тому

      @@jasminewong9023 good question.

  • @kobenson1479
    @kobenson1479 4 дні тому +18

    You should resign automatically. What's the point of apologising.

  • @jltheking3
    @jltheking3 4 дні тому +5

    In an exact identical way to the Allianz-Income fiasco, this shitstorm also shows that our G departments are siloed and not talking to each other at all

  • @ewmurphy
    @ewmurphy 4 дні тому +6

    I find it extremely confusing with the new revelation unheard from 60 years of independence that NRIC card and NRIC no serve different purpose - former for authentication, latter as identifier. Such nuanced demarcation is unacceptable explanation. Should the GOV say the same for passports then and do away completely with physical NRIC and passports? Some organizations that Josephine Teo alluded to include agencies like SPF for "authenticating" purpose as a "legacy" practice. Back to first principles, what is the primary purpose of these official documents - to IDENTIFY AND AUTHENTICATE, no? Any revamp comes with Whole of GOV legacy housekeeping and alignment first and adequate communication of rationale to public. Execution is extremely poor, no denial.

  • @seahxinbeicorrina8189
    @seahxinbeicorrina8189 2 дні тому +1

    So are you staying our system is not strong enough and some IC/ personal details have leaked out? To unknown companies w/o our knowledge?

  • @dutchmilk
    @dutchmilk 3 дні тому +1

    if this was done by small potato or a non PAP members, they would seek blood. Double standard.

  • @stevenheng8956
    @stevenheng8956 4 дні тому +1

    In the nric system, the year of birth is identical to the front 2 nric number. With the year of birth known, many things can be manipulated.

  • @jasonlai1892
    @jasonlai1892 4 дні тому +2

    Mrs Josephine. I appreciate your apology but thats not what i need. I just need the govt to be on the side of the majority views and be the voice for us since we voted PAP to be govt. So far so good govt has listen to the public outcry and u turn good no. of policies such as ezlink card, Income Allianze and for the time being unmasking incident. You need executives who are sensitive to the ground instead of making unpopular policies from ivory tower.

  • @SamShama-m8g
    @SamShama-m8g 4 дні тому +14

    This is not accepted beingna miniter.we have lostnthe trust

    • @Hs5687
      @Hs5687 3 дні тому

      Intentional Regime Change Underway 😊

  • @stevenheng8956
    @stevenheng8956 4 дні тому +2

    Do u know why foreign companies come here? Privacy. When you make such data public, it defeats the purpose. In business, privacy is key.

  • @eddieang761
    @eddieang761 4 дні тому +2

    Ya...gov pay you so much money to say sorry 😂

  • @hannah5245
    @hannah5245 11 годин тому

    Eh. We all make mistakes. She is apologising. How now will she make the corrections?

  • @tonykwok9763
    @tonykwok9763 4 дні тому +1

    👎👎👎👎👎PAP GOV.....👎👎👎👎👎🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬 GST.....CPF.....CASINO LEVY.....MRT.....TAXI.....BUS.....COL....👎👎👎👎👎PAY AND PAY GOV🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬

  • @jasminewong9023
    @jasminewong9023 День тому +1

    Then why the Year of Birth is not removed in those NRIC since it makes us vulnerable? Talking so much but makes no sense.

  • @tommyGeylang1637
    @tommyGeylang1637 4 дні тому +1

    Use last 4 digits ? Can't use ?

  • @flowertowerrr
    @flowertowerrr 4 дні тому +1

    Tan ah gao

  • @dhamol4497
    @dhamol4497 4 дні тому

    Okay... the nation is wrong 😅

  • @hiroyukishinichi9873
    @hiroyukishinichi9873 4 дні тому +2

    PAP ministers are capable of apologising, WP Prata Singh? Never ONCE apologise in person for AHTC loss of public money, covering up Khan’s lie👉 dare to say “I only answer to Aljunied residents”

  • @kennethgoh7198
    @kennethgoh7198 День тому

    Seriously this lady apologises way too many times … can you do something right or at least don’t do anything …. Wa Lao eh ..

  • @harmanakil6792
    @harmanakil6792 3 дні тому

    who the person liabity to this incopetency ?....lol
    blunder,should resign,hara kiri,waste taxpayer $$

  • @lamws41
    @lamws41 4 дні тому

    Smart nation 😂😂😂

  • @rylee4383
    @rylee4383 4 дні тому +1

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @mrtienphysics666
    @mrtienphysics666 4 дні тому

    Why are they saying sorry?

  • @nikkicherry6559
    @nikkicherry6559 4 дні тому +2

    All Singaporeans always trust in PAP.

    • @michael8372
      @michael8372 4 дні тому +3

      Only 61 percent. Probably lower this coming GE.

    • @nomanisanisland2109
      @nomanisanisland2109 3 дні тому +1

      Nonsense. What is your nric please? Care to share?

  • @anziar3038
    @anziar3038 4 дні тому +1

    That's a first-world PAP which is the only responsible and self-accountable party in s'pore.❤