DECtalk DTC01 - 1984 Speech Synthesizer
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 лип 2024
- The DECtalk is a feature packed voice synthesizer and this model, the DTC01, was the first DECtalk released in 1984.
DECtalk DTC01 Emulator: archive.org/details/dectalk
If you want to use any of the examples from this video, I've uploaded the entire script here with some light formatting: gist.github.com/AkBKukU/dba8d...
Chapters:
0:00 Intro
0:46 Speech Synth History
3:33 A Closer look at the DTC01
5:05 Using the DTC01
9:34 Dennis Klatt's Work
11:54 Other Uses of the Speech Model
12:50 DECtalk over the Phone
16:58 Phonemes and Singing
19:55 DECtalk Express
21:08 Closing Thoughts
Here are some ways to help me make more videos!
Buy some Merch:
Merch: tech-tangents.creator-spring....
Leave a one time tip:
Paypal one-time: paypal.me/AkBKukU
Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/techtangents
Amazon Wishlist for Production Gear:
www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls...
Become a monthly supporter:
Patreon: / akbkuku
UA-cam Membership: / @techtangents
Paypal Monthly: techtangents.net/support/
Other Links
UA-cam: / akbkuku
Twitch: / techtangents
Github: github.com/AkBKukU
Thingiverse: www.thingiverse.com/AkBKukU
Discord: / discord - Наука та технологія
My apologies to F- *r* -ail Frank, the Fail was on my part there with that typo in the original script that I didn't catch until it was already uploaded.
John Madden
Fail Frank is so much better, though ;D
You could say that was a Fail Frank moment you had!
"If you can hear this, there's a good chance your DECtalk is working"
I love how this is phrased. "It's probably working, but don't get too excited just yet"
Typical engineering. Don't overpromise.
Perfect Paul was the voice used by NOAA Weather Radio when they replaced human-read recordings of weather forecasts with speech synthesis in the late 1990s. In 2002 they began replacing him with more natural-sounding voices, but Paul could still be heard giving station IDs for many years after that.
I thought it sounded super familiar!
I think my local station still has the ID spoken by a DECTalk of some sort. I'll have to check tomorrow.
@@mllarson Here's Paul giving the forecast in 2016: ua-cam.com/video/4wcjlBtdi_E/v-deo.html#t=32s
@@mllarson if it does let me know what station it is
You would also sometimes hear stations switching to Paul as a fallback whenever the other systems would get overloaded. I miss the multi voice setup, because of course we don't have that with the BMH anymore.
As a blind nerd I can say that we still talk about these fantastic things. Many a skit has been made with them by a bored kid (blind or not) with access to an emulater. And a lot of us still prefer klat synthesis over more modern solutions because of how much more response (I.E. lower latency) it can be, and sometimes because it's clearer at higher speeds. Neural voices might sound really good, but when your main interface to a system is by speech, you don't care how beautiful the voice sounds, you care about how fast you can interact with it, and how much information it can tell you per second. What good is a nice sounding voice if you have to wait even 0.2 seconds after you press any single key for it to start telling you what control is now focused?
That’s a great point! I hadn’t really thought about the “nicer” voices having lower intelligibility at high speeds.
Even though I’ve got blind folks in my family and were aware of more things than most sighted people, there’s still a lot that goes over my head! (Which I shouldn’t be surprised by - when I started using a wheelchair I realised I’d only previously noticed 10% of the obstacles my sister navigated in hers.)
I actually prefer to listen to a distinctively artificial voice rather than a nearly-human voice. The nearly-human voice has an "uncanny valley" effect on me. It's disturbing at some level. I can't bear to listen to those AI-voiced UA-cam channels.
I guess I'm in the blind minority because I really can't stand the older voices and the way they speak and pronounce things. I guess this might come from having a name that was never pronounced right, with a silent vowel. I can understand Vocalizer and Siri voices just fine at high speeds. I remember jumping ship from Eloquence to RealSpeak as soon as those voices were available. However, I'm still quite picky. I really only like Nuance voices, and only if I can't use an Apple Siri voice. However, I'm sure some people are glad to have the old Mac voices on, say, iOS, or the eloquence voices.
I'm 100% with you. Give me a distinctly synthetic voice over concatenated speech sample voices any day. They're faster, lighter on resources, and generally more flexible. Dectalk and eSpeak (now EspeakNG) are my favorites of the formant and synthetic methods. Plus the flexibility and power of Dectalk make it a lot of fun.
Ah let's not forget Doubletalk if we're talking old tts. Another great lightweight solution. Hoping for a modern software interpretation of that someday.
I admit I prefer Eloquence over many other, arguably better voices. The voice has familiarity, true, but it is just generally more readable for me. I use mine at a rate, generally, of 80 to 90% of maximum, and while I can get that high with some other voices from time to time or in special circumstances, Eloquence is simply the best solution, for me personally, in terms of latency and intelligibility. I'm pretty sure it's also Klat based.
That being said, I think that, given the impetous to do so, a voice using more modern technology could probably be optimized for comprehensibility at higher speeds. Sharper consonants, short but defined pauses, and carefully non-truncated phonemes would definitely be nice to have. The problem is, as I said, in optimization rather than actual capability. As we all know, the modern voices are optimized to sound humanlike, including human speaking heuristics at human speech rates. It's all a question of priority and experience.
Let's give a brief example. I was very surprised to learn quite how fast the Windows OneCore voices can be made to go. But the comprehensibility, in my experience, of those voices falls off pretty sharply. The trouble isn't speaking rate. The trouble, instead, is an enhancement of the built-in speech errors that work to make those voices, such as they are, sound more natural. I did run into that a little, even with DECTalk, it has certain errors in pronunciation to make it sound more natural.
The point is, with modern voices, we have technology optimized to function best at typic human speech parameters. The older tech is more robust using different parameters specifically because it wasn't optimized for anything in particular. Specialization limits general utility.
In other words, it's an old, true saying that the jack of all trades is master of none.
I would expand that by saying, the master of one trade is good for little else.
I used to work for DEC back in 1978-1981 as a Sr Field Service Rep in NYC & 1984-1987 As then a Field Engineer in Woburn, MA. I even met Ken Olson at the Mill At Maynard, MA
19:11 noooooo. You must make it sing "Daisy, Daisy give me your answer true, I'm half crazy with my love for you".
No no, it needs to sing John Madden.
I first learned about DECTalk from Moonbase Alpha. It's the in game text to speech engine and it is fully capable of all the commands. People would make it sing about John Madden and whatnot years ago. I also didn't realize the phone dialing commands had a use until you showed how it could be built into a phone system, that makes sense now. Thanks for covering this subject, I love the piece of history that surrounds DECTalk and not just because of the Moonbase Alpha memes.
That’s fascinating, for me it was just a neat easter egg, but I’m really really happy that it’s introduced more people to the culture of speech synthesis history :)
John Madden
@@zaremol2779 AIOUAOIUAOIUAOIUAOIU
@@s8wc3 holla holla get dolla
Mamma Mia. Papa pia. baby got the diarrheeeeeeeeeaaaah
It took me a moment to figure it out, but yeah Perfect Paul (or Variable Val) is the voice they used for the jacket in Back to the Future II: "Your jacket is now dry!"
I still think the Dectalk Speech Synthesizer is one of the very best real Computer Speech Synthesizers. I'm so glad to have 2 of them! I only hope that the source code to the software version of the Speech Synthesizer will one day be made open source
at least it's on github
@@rommix0 Do you have the github link so I can check it out?
Wow, that street/saint is VERY impressive - even with today’s more realistic speech synthesis, that abbreviation differentiation still trips-up Google’s webpage reader.
Can't help but love how your videos aren't just "look at how super cool this rare cool thing is!" (which would be great already) but "look at how super cool this rare cool thing is! Now I'm going to educate you on a metric ton of history and technical lore about it in an easily digestible format because I went out of my way to research the subject more in depth than you could ever ask for!"
For real, thank you.
My dad was a blind computer user back in the 80s (and from then on til he passed) and DEC talk was always the gold standard that his speech systems would be trying to meet. He couldn't afford an actual DEC but he did a really good immitation of perfect paul!
Fun fact: the "Dennis Klatt" speech synthesizer that was used in DECTalk is available as open source. It is a tiny but very elegantly written C program that takes a stream of 19 parameters to produce an audio wave output. All you have to do is feed it with the 19 parameters and it will vocalize it.
Wish someone would give that a proper GUI and release a lightweight standalone version for Linux and Windows.
I still have one of the 90s vintage Dectalk devices. It's the size of a paperback book. Was one of a box of a thousand units that were going to be destroyed by the state, if nobody asked for them. I was lucky to get one, for free!. Most of my other blind friends jumped on that deal. By the way, you really need to be working in commercial broadcasting. Your voice is the kind PDs look for, in both radio, and television. I know, because I've worked in commercial radio. Thanks for the video. Really enjoyed the history of this device.
DECtalk DTC-01 v1.8 units are VERY RARE, I only know of one other unit with that firmware in it.
Beware if you try to update the unit to DECtalk DTC-01 v2.0, you not only need to replace the 16 EPROMs, you also need to replace the two bipolar PROMs which hold the firmware for the TMS32010 DSP, since if you run DECtalk v2.0 68000 code with the DECtalk v1.8 DSP code, the speech output will be very quiet, maybe 1/2 or 1/4 of the volume it should be.
(BTW, do you have high-res pictures of those EPROMs and PROMs? I want to be sure MAME has the EPROM labels correct for them in their DECtalk emulation driver.)
Unless there is something major like a fix for the screeching when singing I don't anticipate updating it to 2.0 because it works. I'm imagining the one other 1.8 unit is probably the one that the MAME ROMs came from?
That's good to know it would be more complicated than I anticipated if I tried though.
I did put a picture of the entire mainboard up on my device repair site here: caps.wiki/wiki/DECtalk_DTC01#/media/File:DTC01_Mainboard.jpg
If you need more specific detailed shots or something else feel free to ask! If email is better you can also reach me at akbkuku@akbkuku.com . I'm happy to help preserve this device through emulation!
@@TechTangents Yes, that's where the MAME ROMs came from.
Hell, those youtube channels that use AI speech bots can't even get half the pronunciations right. This is truly impressive.
As a blind person I even hate those poor-quality voices they use. If you're going to stick a TTS voice on your channel, at LEAST use a Nuance or Siri voice, or something that doesn't sound like total garbage.
I don't think that's AI, just a python script and a traditional voice engine.
But the voice used in those video is iconic itself, so I doubt it'll be changed.
I my self still to this day use a Klatt based synthesizer last updated in around 2003 called ETI Eloquence. That particular synth has-been through lots of owners, to the point where untill june this year I wasn't even sure which company owned it. If you've ever worked with IBM ViaVoice in the 90s and early 2000s, you've probably heard it, as it was briefly forked by IBM and went by ViaVoice TTS.
Many blind people, including me, adore this synthesizer to this day simply because of how responsive it is at fast speeds. Synthesizers like DECtalk tend to slurr at fast speeds which makes them hard to understand. Eloquence is so widely used by the blind community to the point where Apple has introduced this 20 year-old synthesizer to iOS 16 and mac OS 13. That choice was widely applauded by people like me as I just can't stand using natural synthesizers for longer than a few days without missing my trusty Eloquence at this point.
Very clear and intelligible speech, especially for something from 1984!
Growing up near the DEC campus, I would love a history of DEC. As a kid, many of my friends parents worked there and also Wang. So hard to believe these giants are gone.
RIP Alta Vista. They were googed to death.
RIP Wang Computers.
John Madden John Madden John Madden.
10:03 "Like earlier speech synthesizers, the DECtalk uses Linear Predictive Coding" - This is entirely wrong.
DECtalk uses a formant-based cascaded vocal tract engine, developed by Dennis Klatt around 1977-1980 at MIT and called "KLSYN" (later 'KLSYN80' to differentiate it from a later version he made around 1988 just before his death). The Fortran source code for an early version of KLSYN was published in the article "Software for a cascade/parallel Formant Synthesizer" in the volume 67 issue 3(March 1980) of the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. It does not use LPC coding at all!
Klatt himself ported this Fortran code to C (you can find versions of this on github) and also ported it initially to hand-made assembly code for the TMS32010 in DECtalk DTC-01 v1.8; DECtalk DTC01 v2.0 has a later version of the DSP code with a number of bugs fixed, which was ported from his C version in 1983-ish.
That is fascinating to know! I was basing this off of the Popular Science article I read which phrased it in a way that wasn't entirely clear throughout the article but made me think it was LPC.
books.google.com/books?id=f2_sPyfVG3AC&pg=PA42&dq=dectalk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjJlvqtgZz6AhUbJUQIHfD2BGAQ6AF6BAgDEAI#v=onepage&q=dectalk&f=false
@@TechTangents I can confirm this -- and the weird artifacts you heard in "Let It Be" were overloads in the vocal tract model.
This brought back memories of my high school days. I was given a TRS-80 speech synthesizer by a high school teacher. I thought it was a loan and gave it back. He later told me he intended for me to keep it, but i was too young and stupid to do so.
That device was way simpler than the DEC talk, but it worked similarly, and probably had some of the same tech in it. But you HAD to send phonemes to it for it to work, and it could not sing. But still, for the time it was amazing tech.
What a fantastically thorough and entertaining look at DECTalk. In the summer of 1984 I worked on porting the precursor software of DECTalk; MITalk or KlattTalk, from a VAX computer system to a PDP-11 (or vice versa. It has been a very long time). I was able to hear DECTalk sing that summer in a speech lab at Indiana University. The song I remember most was Tom Lehrer's Poisoning Pigeons in the Park. Speech synthesis was very exciting to me then and still is interesting to me. Prior to that I had an Echo II speech synthesizer in my Apple II+. Thanks for posting this!
I'd love to know if any source code to either MITalk or Klattalk has actually survived, I've been unable to find anything myself.
I haven't even been able to find a binary copy of either MITalk nor Klattalk, so if you have any leads...
Strange urge to go and watch the 1986 classic movie, Short Circuit...
We just need it to start singing covers of the GlaDOS songs from Portal 🤓
There's one setting that's very culturally relevant to a much wider swath of people than it would, at first glance, appear.
I've seen DECTalk in a variety of movies, mostly or entirely from the 80s. It's in Back To The Future II and also the first Short Circuit movie, just to name a couple. It's also featured in some music, both from the time and from later.
But the most lingering cultural heritage DECTalk gave us is its singing. Listen to some of the early Vocaloids. Notice anything familiar? Even the vibrato patterns they use are similar to those found in singing DECTalk. I don't know if they give credit or not; that kind of thing doesn't appeal to me as a topic of research, but there's some pretty elaborate stuff to be found which was sung by DECTalk. I happen to know some of the pioneers in that field, so to speak. It's little wonder that someone would want to capture the amazing novelty of that and package it in a much more user friendly form. I have never personally made Hatsune Miku or her relatives sing, but I can't imagine it'd be so popular if it took the effort DECTalk's interface does. I've definitely used the DECTalk singing manual a time or two, and it's mentally rather taxing, as the video creator can easily confirm.
And there's one more piece of heritage. Again, I can't confirm who borrowed from whom or to whom credit was given, but several of the Macintalk or Plaintalk voices owe their inspiration, if not their existence, to the DECTAlk and the work of Mr. Klat. The easiest example to locate for most of the populace is going to be on iOS or iPadOS. The recent update to iOS 16 gives us more examples, but even older iOS versions have access to Fred, a voice that's been around for a long time. Giving Fred a listen certainly elicits strong DECTalk vibes, if nothing else. I wish we had a voice more like Perfect Paul, whereas Fred is a bit more like Frail Frank, but honestly, even having Fred around is a nice bit of nostalgia.
DECTalk is a serious icon of computer speech synthesis technology, and I'm glad people are starting to remember how amazing it really is and what a truly inspiring legacy and lineage it has.
Thank you for the wonderful video.,
4:38 I love how YT's automatic subtitles thinks that it's saying "d/ck talk version 1.8"
Hearing this say sharp instead of pound instead of hashtag made me experience a brief, yet intense, temporal dislocation.
One of those used to rat people out for skipping classes at my highschool by calling parents at home. I think the only time it called my house, I was the one who answered the phone, luckily. Just before I dropped out, I had a summer job at the school district datacenter writing a program used to validate the attendance records from a printout after the cards were scanned. Digital made some cool stuff.
Dang. All the robots in the movie Short Circuit musta been voiced by this fella. As you were going through the list I was like "yep, that one's in the movie too". Very cool!
Yup, that's what they used for them. At least in the original. In the german dub they got voiced by actual humans with robotic sound effect.
I have an original DECtalk Express from 90s. It was actually purchased new for a 286 DOS computer then used later with a 386 and Windows 3.11. It is still working today and after all these years, the original flat cell battery just recently failed. Can't say that for new products!
I still hear it in my head "DECtalk Express is running version 4.2c....external power on" or "internal power on" and gives you the percentage of life left. The DECtalk really is an outstanding piece of hardware.
Have you seen the "Type n Speak"? Those are really interesting computers without screens that have this same voice or simular chip built in. The deep voice on the type n speak is named Rocco "rock-oh" 😅
As someone who has messed around with the Variable Val voice, I can definitely say that those distortions/feedback in some scenarios are definitely frustrating, even in the native PC ports of the DECtalk software. (Which is much newer than the DECtalk units shown here - rather it’s the same version number that the first iteration of the NOAA Weather Radio automated speech synthesis system)
I can tell this problem's even worse in DECtalk 1.8 as compared to the PC port's version, since I customized _way_ more of Val's parameters before it glitched - 1.8 experienced issues just by changing the nasal resonator gain, which one of the songs did. Not sure if this glitch is triggered that easily in the 2.0 upgrade though, but I imagine it doesn't.
Great video, one of your best ones so far. I really appreciate the little skits with the DECtalk voice.
On another note, the 68k chip really went into everything. If you had a Mac, a DECtalk and a LaserJet back then, you had three of them. Imagine having a Threadripper in your printer nowadays...
Paul, Rita, Dennis, Frank, Ursula & Kit all still sound cooler than all the "natural" text to speech voices we have today. Dunno why but i just always preferred the robotic synthesized text to speech voices so much more but i do because i just love to hear a synthetic voice that does not hide its synthetic nature. For the same reason i love vintage CGI animations so much. I just wish there would be a modern multiplatform based software version for modern operating systems or even a standalone handheld Text to Speech computer that uses the DecTalk Speech Synthesis. Even the VOTRAX SC-01A would be great to have as a modern standalone Speech Computer module. However i still prefer DecTalk. There have even been SAPI3 Text to Speech voices from IBM that sounded almost like that. Same voice but in different languages. The german version of DecTalk sadly wasn't perfect and had a bit of an accent and some misspronounciations and wrong vowls but it was still kinda usable. But just not as good as the english one.
Love the voices of this thing, used in 1986's Short Circuit, specifically for the voice of the S.A.I.N.T.S (Possibly Paul or Harry with pitch modifications) & the Catering/Coffee Robot (Tweaked Betty voice).
Coffee service coming through. Please watch your step.
Yep, they mostly used Huge Harry (monotone, no inflection) but Perfect Paul was also used in introduction/demonstration scene.
@@adimifus interesting that during that entire demonstration, its only number 1 speaking, yet his voice changes lol. at least, the subtitles SAY its number 1, as he's the first to come on stage and speak. then the voice changes during the tonic scene.
@@ViewpointProd I guess its hard to say what robot is "speaking" when. Since the cocktail scene involves #2 and #3, I would assume its one of them talking during that part. Later on in the movie, all three of them use the Huge Harry voice, so I guess they do change.
Maybe they switch Perfect Paul when they're trying to be more "personable" like during the demonstrations at the beginning. Or maybe I'm just reading into it too much... 🤷
Your productions are quite remarkable, I particularly enjoy the way you speak. Great work!
Truly great stuff with all hard work you put into this video, but the moment I heard DECtalk speak It took me right back to watching Star Trek: TNG as a kid, and to the scene in the Holodeck where Steven Hawking guest stared, and was playing cards with Data, and Mr. Hawking smiles!! 👍👍
We had 16 of these units hosted on a pair of VAX VMS machines, that ran our automated payment and information systems at our council. The whole thing was in a pair of racks - and worked 24/7. It allowed you to pay parking fines, rates, everything. They needed constantly needed maintenance. I got very good at writing-out ROMS and swapping things over. We decomissioned the whole thing in 1998 and sold it all off - replacing it with a couple of Windows PCs and simpler modems.
As a side to this, I had a loner Bondwell portable CP/M unit for a while in 1986 and spent many hours with _that_ speech chip :)
Amazing video. I love 80's speech synth. Hopping over to the emulator, I enjoyed having it speak some highly intelligent phrases like "farts" and "butts". LOL
Inputing individual phonemes also unlocks other languages. I experimented with similar Commodore based program and learning it how to pronounce things in Czech language. It worked as a filter - I had Czech text written as normal, my magic filter which translated it into list of phonemes and original commodore program to turn it into sound. Impractical but very funny.
Your jacket is now dry!
I love those old speech synthesizers. They really are the best. Also, I've still got your old channel name as the bookmark for your video page, I should probably update it, maybe make an addendum that it's now Tech Tangents. I keep thinking who's Tech Tangents every time I see it until I realize, oh yeah, he used to be AkBKukU.
I grew up with Perfect Paul from NOAA Weather Radio to the TTS on one of my first computers its associated with quite a few childhood memories. I occasionally let it read emails and articles to me just for nostalgia kicks.
Years ago I built a speech synthesiser from a chip-set sold by Tandy (Radio Shack)
For an idiotic project, I 'made' a telephone ringer out of it, as in the old land line phones, not the modern cell junk.
I connected a hayes compatible modem to the phone line (which solved any legal woes about connecting to the line). These modems send out the text 'Ring' when there is incoming ring/call. this was fed into the speech synth, then from there into a PA amplifier. So when the phone rang, a large horn speaker started yelling 'Ring, Ring Ring'
It worked, it was really bad, after the second call I pulled it down, the synth has not seen any use since....
Awesome overview. Well done!
Great video! I’m reminded of Short Circuit’s serving robots from the intro. One thing though, it seems there was quite a bit of low frequency noise that could be removed with something like Audacity.
It was also massively used for all the speaking 2015 gadgets in "Back to the Future Part II".
That is easily one of your best videos! Thanks for that insight into that chunk of a speech synth!
My mind is blown. Great video!
Concise and fun, can't ask for anything more. Thank you.
This is an excellent vid on Dectalk and speech synthesis. Appreciate all the history and research you did here. Great stuff!
i LOVE dectalk! wish i could get myself a working unit somehow 😭
This was the coolest intro I've seen in a long time!
Very cool piece of history! Thank you so much for sharing this.
I used to have modem access to work. We had a Dectalk. So it was pretty easy to type in who and see if anyone was there late at night. If there was, the fun began. As you could send commands to make it speak from home and know who to address.
I'm thrilled, what an enjoyable summary of DECtalk. Thank you!
Fantastic video, as usual. You're really good at discovering, showcasing and explaining some of the (now) obscure vintage stuff that I've either never heard of or never would have had the opportunity to play with back in the day.
The computerized voices in the movie Short Circuit.
Spectacular video. I LOVE old Digital-branded equipment.
Very good job on this presentation. Accurate history.
Great video on a very cool piece of kit that I had never heard of before.
Nice Weird Al reference.
'Don't go makin' phony calls
Please stick to the seven-digit numbers you're used to'
This piece of kit really speaks for itself 😆
Waa waa waaaaa ba doomp tisss
(I hope you're not listening to this on one of those old synthesizers that third wa might have sounded like the computer was gargling underwater, as it crashed)
Nice Bell Atlantic Phone, i have a little nostalgia for that company, it was the phone company from when i was a kid until i turned 11.
Command error in phoneme.
It is amazing just how much that thing can do.
Man, this is a great break down of what the DECtalk can do. Makes my old Votrax look like a toy by comparison.
this was super cool and its taught me a lot about how impressive old tech is even compared to something fairly recent. i work on utau a lot (which i have videos of, if you dont know what it is), and even after using paul's voice for a song, its made me realize something interesting-- his data is actually really small! a regular utau voice bank is almost double or triple the size, and is capable of far less on its own compared to this which can talk and even sing with relative ease. of course, the medium its used though is different, but i think thats what makes it more unique
I was thinking of vocaloid and utau the entire time watching this
That’s amazing. Thanks for the tutorial!
By the sound of it, British Telecom are still using this exact model to deliver text over land line.
What an AMAZING device. Love to learn about those technologies that were far ahead of their time. Thanks for the video!
Also: can it handle languages other than English? Did DEC release phoneme banks for that, or could it be done by careful manipulation of the existing ones?
@@rigues Other languages were released later, however they left a lot to be desired.
You reminded me all i almost forgot about this lovely thing 😀
Our rare C64 thing sounded lovely with SID 😁
I saw an interesting video of something Bell Labs made in 1939 called the Voder. It used a combination of different sounds and filters, operated through a number of keys and foot pedals to make human speech. It required a bit of training however from the human operator, and was not easy to operate. The Voder was shown at the 1939 Worlds Fair. Back then it was just tubes and analog circuits and the operator had to shape each word using the right keys at the right time. Interesting how speech synths started, before digital stuff.
I really want one now. More than when I saw it on stream
DEC was on another level.
That is cool!
John Madden.
aeiou
Holla Holla Get Dollar!
The second most iconic use of this is that it is the tts in moonbase alpha
why is old digital technology so damn fascinating, I love it. I need a big house or storage facility, to buy ebay empty from this stuff
This absolutely blows my mind, most if not all features (barring the syntax itself) are ones I can find
in the commercial Text-to-Speech software I use, like. They function the exact same way.
DECtalk really walked so that the likes of Nuance (Formerly Loquendo) could run, truly amazing stuff
Thank you for showcasing it, and thank you Dennis Klatt and everyone who helped you make this a reality
68K processor, awesome. I like getting a voice synthesizer to sing.
I have a similar device with all of the same voices. Its a Words+ Commpac System 2000 I got with a touch screen equipped NEC Versa M75 486 Laptop. Words+ made the speech synths for Stephen Hawking. Words+ was founded in 1981 by Walter and Virginia Woltocz and worked with Hawking around 1985. The system 2000 unit is from the mid-late 1990s. Cool finally knowing who created all those voices. IIRC the internal synth uses a lot of DEC branded silicon. Got to wonder if DEC and Words+ had a close working relationship.
I've mentioned this on some other peoples videos about "speech synthesizers" - there is an article in Byte Magazine (is it May 83?) with circuit board layout for a Vortrax speech chip, connects to the printer port, and code to use it from GW-BASIC - I built one in around 1996, but it appeared the Vortrax chip I had was dead, and although I could buy one from Germany at the time, it was cost prohibitive for me (on the other side of the world, over 200 dollars in local currency, not including delivery).
That was pretty cool! Although you should've had the DECtalk do the sign off at the end to bring it back around to the setup at the beginning of the DECtalk presenting the video.
I picked up a software file for DECTalk 5 from some archive page somewhere. I very quickly realised it was no primitive program. It's nice to finally understand where it all came from. I also have a very large list of the various song I could find online (as well as replicating on of those Moonbase Alpha videos on this account from a few years back called _The Kerbal songs of Munbase Alpha_ )
Impressive device :)
I feel fantastic!
Now this is early voice synthesis!
General Instruments also had a successful set of voice synthesis chips called the SP0256, with several variants. The SP0256-AL2 was even available at Radio Shack. Its capabilities were similar to TI's chips.
Rough Rita is to blame for the excessive yellowing on 80s and 90s computer hardware
I have a TI-99 speech synth module, it's so fun to mess around with.
I had a Votrax VC02 once on my college campus. I had a terminal attached to it. It had a particular feature that if you typed for instance the F-bomb, it would not say that, but rather "Fudge!" If you wanted it to say that, you had to write it phonetically.
Ok I think this is the right time to ask. Does anyone remember a "Dr Sbaitso" text to speech demo in the 80s? I remember it so clearly. Sounded just like this device.
ב''ה, not sure the origins of the synthesis engine, but fairly certain that was packaged by Creative Labs to demo the SoundBlaster (possibly the now classic and venerable SB16) or at least named after it.
Dr Sbaitso was from the early 90s, and used a different speech synthesizer (Smooth Talker from First Byte).
Wow impressive.
wow the data about Hawkings switching to a RPi to emulate the original robot voice is 🤯
Well done with the comedy timing😁. It would be fun to do a short review, maybe of another speech synth and let the Dec talk do all the talking (you could take a nap!, a well earned day off 😁).
Probably not very common knowledge but this speech synthesizer was used for some of the voices of the Robots in Short Circuit during the beginning of the movie. And though I can’t confirm it maybe the scene in Bttf 2 during the “dry mode” scene.
The coffee robot uses the betty voice, no idea on the Others though, it seems they may have had the pitches changed
15:31 Nice touch with the extension number there
This is an amazing piece of tech from the old days which can put to shame even some contemporary products.
Phony Calls reference much appreciated. 😉