'Are You Aware Of All That?': Lindsey Graham Questions Witness About Guns
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 бер 2023
- At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) questioned witnesses about gun statistics.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
Soft on crime means tough times for the citizens of this country
All part of the agenda
Cultural Marxism 101
Funny ----Adolph Hitler had said the exact same thing...!
The usa has more people in prison then any other country what makes you think thats soft on crime
@@williamlacentra2808 when, and to whom?
If a DA or AG is not going to follow the laws. They then need to be arrested and place in jail. As does a judge who given a soft sentence to a dangerous person
What if members of Congress and the POTUS dont follow the laws, then what?
The scariest thing you can hear is "I'm from the government and I'm here to help"
Wouldn't it be awesome is all hearings went this way...... everyone answering the questions asked directly and truthfully ?
Remind me again, how much time did Hunter and his girlfriend/wife get for illegal purchase and disposal of a pistol.
Yeah, that's what our country should be worried about right now. Such a "threat". LMAO
@@dutchdna If it was a ghetto thug and his bish who did the exact same crime, would that be a threat to society?
The law must be applied evenly. Besides, the issue here is gun crime and how to stop it. Enforcing existing laws would be a good start instead of making more laws criminals will ignore. If we stop disqualified, potentially dangerous people from having guns, that's good. If one of them is Hunter, good.
Hunter won't be charged just like thousands of other criminals allowed to run free to commit more crimes that won't be punished. Kind of a pattern there.
it was probably hunters GHOST gun the 6 year old found at school to shoot his teacher with.
@@dutchdna Hunter is a threat to national security. He's also proof that criminals don't obey gun laws.
@@dutchdna well if the "Presidents" son can get away with criminality why shouldn't everyone else, it's the examples that the Biden's show that is a problem here.
Kudos to the news reporter who told Gorie Litefoot to ,pack up your bags and get out of our town.
He spoke for the majority of that city's people.
When I saw that clip I couldn't help but laugh.
Litefoot’s face says it all!
Yes! And stay the hell away from mine!
@@geoffreysmommy a
Please, her name is BEETLEJUICE....
They treat these criminals with kid gloves and keep putting them back on the street. But when a citizen is forced to defend themselves with a firearm from these repeat violent criminals they are seriously charged.
They want to disarm America so the take over will be alot easier.
Just make the bodies disappear. No body, no charge. Don't do as I say, just saying
Here is my anecdote on police “morale”. I have three friends who were police officers. One quit and changed professions due to funding cuts. One retired early due to apathetic prosecutors who would not enforce laws on the books. One died because he was shot and killed in the line of duty responding to a false domestic dispute 911 call made with the perp sniping the first officer that showed up at the call. That is my view on police morale.
Your anecdote paints a tragic picture for America. I do not dispute it in any way. I was a law enforcement officer for over five years in both Mississippi and Alabama.
I would submit that humans evaluate their situation as an ongoing situation.
If or when someone perceives that they are moving into an untenable situation (where their safety is at risk) they would chose to avoid that.
Law enforcement officers often encounter situations where the risk is unknown (yet are required to proceed). Like traffic stops, like domestic calls, like alarms at buildings . . . . and so many other situations. Yet if something questionable occurs, then the LEO (law enforcement officer) is arrested, charged and tried for whatever, and the finder of fact (usually a jury of 12 people) is empaneled to decide based upon the evidence presented, and to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the person being prosecuted has done all of the elements of the crime or not. It must be highlighted that at trial the finder of fact has a relative infinite time to judge; while on the other hand, the LEO has a fraction of a second to decide upon their action.
Law enforcement officers occupy a unique position in society. They are thrust into situations more so than regular citizens where a continuum of force is required to prevail in their lawful actions and survival. Yet those lawful actions are vigorously opposed often by people they encounter.
The complexity of the infinite situations is discounted by the Left.
Because of that sniping attack many states send out swat units on domestic disturbance calls.
JUST FOLLOW THE EXISTING LAWS ALREADY IN EFFECT! Keep the person who is a threat to the public from being in the general public population and keep them behind bars. We do not need more "gun control" laws. We need better prosecutors and judges to follow the laws.🤷♂️
P 3 D 0_ Lindsey_RINO_🗑️
But in Texas he could still get a gun with a domestic violence charge on his record. Not once was that brought up.
@@jmswillow5969 I don’t live in Texas, but that sounds ludicrous!! 😮
@@jmswillow5969you cant legally buy or possess a firearm if you've ever been convicted of domestic violence. Thats a federal law and is specifically asked in the NCIS background check.
You sir hit it spot on you are absolutely correct.
Shall not be infringed! Period
Who's infringing on your period? That's your private business and no one shall infringe on your period! That's just not right!!!😊
@@amiehulscher7156 the government is infringing on the second amendment !
What other constitutional rights do you need a background check and pay for a permit ???? None
Lindsey voted for "the safer community's act" one of the most anti bill of rights pos bills i ever saw it directly opposes no less then 4 different sections of the bill of rights. It should go before the supreme court and be voted down by it as unconstitutional and thrown back to congress.
@@amiehulscher7156 P 3 D 0_ Lindsey_RINO_🗑️
@@amiehulscher7156 ..control your spoon before blabbing nonsense
Nothing short of suing Judges and or Prosecutors for letting Offenders out to offend again will it stop.
😢 I believe they have qualified immunity from lawsuits resulting from their decisions.
They need to have a hearing why politicians don't up hold their oath to the Constitution?
When you only have one police officer for every 10 Square miles in many states. When the response time is measured in hours, you are an instant victim if you are not armed.
cops dont stop crime. they dont prevent crime either. All they do is respond to it and in the US at least where everything is constantly ass backwards often make the situation worse off than it would be without them involved at all for any and all parties involved.
Don’t worry, they will thoroughly document where your body was found.....
@@jeffhicks8428
The prevent crime by being present and doing their job.
Democrats have halted that.
You don't cover "empty land" where there's hardly anything to police. You cover populated areas. Using square miles is ridiculous. We have plenty cops in this country.
@@dutchdna I'm sure that women kidnapped and murdered jogging along the farm road agrees with you.
NFL, targeting gets the player removed from the game.
NBA, after a certain amount of fouls the player is removed from the game.
Society should remove the multiple offenders from the “game”.
Well said, I agree!
What good is a law if no one enforces nor punishes one for breaking it?
Thanks to the far left as they have zero respect for law & order..
“The criminal fears neither the police, judge or the jury and must be taught to fear his victim”
This is a simple societal equation. When the criminal feels his action will cost him more than he stands to gain, crime will all but ceased to exist
Exactly which is why in all the states that have gone constitutional carry violent crimes have gone down not up.
You used the wrong word felon is not necessarily how you should describe a person criminal would be better as I can attest to the fact just because you are a felon does not mean you are a criminal I have a felony from when I was 17 years old and am now 51 never been in trouble with the law again and as far as being a felon you can be convicted of a felony for the most ignorant bullshit you can imagine make no mistake
@@mikeedwards320 Great point! I will make the correction
If you don’t mind me asking, for what was your conviction ?
Well said! Enforce current laws. Don’t make more laws that criminals IGNORE anyway.
Laws that the system ignores...
You mean like donald trump & republicans ignoring the law to testify under oath, subpoena or no?
@@ddylla85 You mean like adultery?
@@jaynedoe1959 Look! A red herring!
You all hate L. Graham, stop the hypocrisy.
The biggest change that needs to happen in the justice system is judges and lawyers need to lose immunity and prosecutors need to be motivated by upholding the law instead of ONLY putting wins on their record.
WOW well said. !!!
Remember how Miss Heals Up abused her appointed office in LA?
And where is she now?
Police as well. Qualified immunity has RUINED their attitude towards the job. No need to learn the law when you’re immune from breaking it.
@@joaquina.fineline8893
That because of police unions. Abolish them all, especially for protecting bad cops who abuse their authority.
And officers who have shown a propensity towards violent behavior towards citizens and have numerous complaints. Like a driving license is a privilege, qualified immunity should also be a privilege. Not a right.
The number of gun purchases is directly related to the lack of justice in our country.
Exactly the Democrats want to limit what assets the police departments have then can’t understand why people The people feel the need to arm themselves
We already have laws, get good judges that follow the laws and get rid of the criminal judges and lawyers. Prosecutors need to be changed .🙏🇺🇸❤️
That last statement was the hammer hitting the nail right on the head.
"nealjolly5434," 5:15 - 5:42 [Here it is, in text form, worth repeating] Sen. Graham: "What I would hope this Committee could do is END to the extent possible the revolving door of policies that allow people TIME AND TIME AGAIN to come back out on the streets [and] hurt their fellow citizens. . . . In conclusion, the reason so many people are buying guns is that they've lost faith in their government to protect them."
Ed. - Spot-on and "Bravo!"
Just use the existing laws?
The law is the law get these lawyers to adhere to the laws on the books
The revolving door of justice releases these monsters back into the community that imprisoned them. Do you feel safe?
No
And we wonder why the crime rate has gone up.....
In California, shoplifting is practically decriminalized if the sum total of items is equal to or less than $950 (misdemeanor charge).
@@AdderTude It used to be a misdemeanor if the value was greater than $49.99. And some folks wonder why crime is skyrocketing.....
That last statement of the public has lost faith, you are 100% correct.
Back in the 80's and in NJ, one of my cousins was a prosecuting attorney for close to 10 yrs and he told he that he NEVER prosecuted a "first time offender"...it was always a criminal that he prosecuted previously, it was the whole so called "justice system of revolving door" that allowed the bad guys back out on the streets in a pretty quick manner. BTW, his conviction rate was pretty darn high.
DA conviction rates are so high because they pick the cases they know they can win.
Wow! I actually find myself agreeing with the RINO-in-Chief, Senator Graham.
Yes, I am a Conservative Republican, but there are a handful of politicians in Congress who are literally their stated party affiliation "In Name Only". DINOs and RINOs... relics of a uniparty or "the swamp" are still in Congress. Sen. Graham is one of those and I cannot recall the last time I fully agreed with anything he says.
This is historic on a personal level. I am amazed he isn't trying to wiggle himself into some neutral agreement with his DINO buddies.
When Graham is good, he’s very very good ,but when he’s off. He’s off……
I agree with what he is saying in this clip, but I've seen Graham flip flop on things in the past. I suspect he's up to something nefarious again. I'm never surprised to hear of him violating his oath to uphold the US Constitution
Oh, he is. Trust me, no RINO is slimier than Lindsey Grahamnesty. Hes the kind of creature who could survive a nuclear fall-out.
Lesley is one of the worst John McCain establishment Republicans in the Senate. He should have been voted out of office years ago. No one benefits from his re-election except him.
Graham could be so much more. RINO when it's convenient to him.
According to many men and women in law enforcement, " Laws do not protect people from being stupid or dealing with stupid people.
No It does not. We need to defend ourselves
It's actually suspicious to me on why they're suggesting gun control when those mass shooters could not be stopped by cops in time before they murdered all those kids
@@Havik_86 P 3 D 0_ Lindsey_RINO_🗑️
No, laws only provide punishment for crimes AFTER the crime has been committed.
Future crimes is unconstitutional as you would ve punished for a crime you haven't committed yet, or if you do commit a crime.
That is the best reason our government is not keeping us safe. Excellent point.
The GUN ISNT THE DARN PROBLEM ITS THE PERSON Behind the gun
Punish criminals not the law biding people.
It is a no brainer that violent offenders get incarcerated and not turned loose, and while being incarcerated they should do penance, not be mollycoddled, they are a menace to society so treat them as such
Capital punishment is a deterrent. Instead of Red Flag laws how about Smoking Gun Laws. Reduce the amount of appeals . Set into law term limits for politicians and prosecute the criminal ones.
"They've lost faith in their government to protect them." - Sen. Lindsey Graham. Besides which, Senator, we've pretty well lost faith in our government, PERIOD!
Can’t count on anyone to protect us
Thats why you gotta protect yourself
Usually best way is with a firearm
We shouldn't need our government to protect us, Senator. That's what the second amendment is for.
The government IS there to serve and protect us. The Bill of Rights is there to protect ourself when the government fails to do so. It is also there to protect us against a government gone bad. The Constitution states what gov. can do to you, the Bill of Rights states what the government can NOT do to you. WE need to return to those ideas.
The reason I buy guns is I no longer trust our government.
Amen
Ask those who were at ground zero on 9-11 how government protected us.The then members of the house got out of DC quickly too bad the people in the World Trade Center did not have the same chance.
A N D when seconds count the police are minutes away!!!
When the police make an arrest.These people need to be kept in jail and go to court.
What actually stops repeat offenders? Good grouping center mass
Release criminals back out in the public to harm is the same as reelecting politicians
You are always your best advocate and defender first responder.
The police and law makers are never coming to save you . They are the after thoughts when you have been a victim of a crime already.
We must protect our 2A at all costs!
Cops will go to the power, not the helpless; see Canada for example.
@A-Plus Computer Services Now it's Minute non- binary persons.
how long we put up with these useless politicians
How long so far? Since approximately Teddy Roosevelt. How much longer? That's scary to think about. Which is a big freaking problem, because thinking is being severely denigrated these days. The results of which are also scary to think about.
Meanwhile, the people who most desperately Need to be thinking are claiming that exposing them to things, or thoughts or academic disciplines they dislike is at the vey least a "micro aggression" and a 'hate crime'.
4 years is the term. Don't be a sore loser!
If they are not tracking gun purchases, how do they get the stats?
Excellent question. Senator?? Care to respond??
Thank you so much for your respectfulness and how you ask things even though you’re trying to get your point across you’re never came across as rude or fanatical. It’s much appreciated.
What he said at the end is absolutely true! A repeat criminal broke into my son's home, took his rifle off the wall & my son was awakened by the rifle pointed at his head. Thank the Lord that my son was able to talk him down to the point he could over-take the guy. He chased him diwn the street; cops were called by neighbors & they got him.
First, they let him bond out for 3% of a $50k bail. Then he didn't show up for his trial. Surprise, surprise! Eventually he was arrested again & finally stood trial, found guilty & was sentenced to less than 1 year.
The consequences have to match the crime! Just like President Trump said, "Everything woke goes to sh*t."
Hope he learned not to keep one in the chamber of a gun hanging on the wall.Then the robber would only be able to use it as a club while your son got his stashed loaded one from under the mattress let's say.
He broke into your son's home and threatened him with a firearm! He should at least get locked up for a decade. If I had my way he would've been executed.
deejo 2 What you said at the end is absolutely true!!
@@johnpoole8321 Yes, I'm sure he did.
@@harrylongabaugh7402 I was thinking at least 5 to ten years would've been more appropriate. What's even crazier is at first the officer called my son & said he wasn't going to be able to charge the guy with any more than a misdemeanor because he didn't take anything.😱
I temporarily lost my right to carry due to dirty Pennsylvania State Troopers and a Maryland Carroll County sheriff's deputy. FORTUNATELY, unlike most others, I had videos to prove my innocents. But even with the videos, it was an uphill battle. Cops were never punished so my disdain for cops will never go away. Now, I cringe every time I holster my weapon and leave the house. Tread on this subject lightly.
Maryland is a Marxist blue state. (PA is blue too now) If you move to a red state, like Indiana, none of what happened to you would have happened.
Please understand this.
I have had the same in Phoenix AZ.
Ended up doing consecutive time.
CCTV. from a 7-11. Showed my innocence. I couldn't risk going to Trial. Ingot roped in on 5 bogus charges. The cops over charged me and the way Maricopa county sentences people is that if the defendant take their case to trial and loose say on one or two of the charges.
Then the sentences are maxed out. 18 years
VRS. 5.
1.5
2.5.
With some jail time served.
All that said.
The subject cop LIED ON THE REPORT. AND THE CCTV proved that. Yet it was never used in the arraignment.
@@RM-lk1so I'm truly sorry to hear that, I'm not sure how that happens in this day and age. My evidence was quashed by an assistant district attorney. My attorney told him repeatedly (or at least that's what he told me) I had these videos. Weeks before trial at behest of my attorney, I submitted my video evidence to DA's office. A few weeks later they offered a "deal". All of the possible jail time trickled down to a simple summary offense. A few hundred dollars. The last thing they wanted was evidence like that going before a jury. High definition stuff. Also in PA sitting on exculpatory evident often results in loss of law license, even jail time. Our judicial system is horribly broken, no accountability.
@@RM-lk1so just moved to Prescott Valley. Not sure what kind of cops the staties are yet but your story gives me no confidence. Thankfully our county’s sheriffs stand with us but being involved in a situation with a firearm scares me. You don’t need a permit to conceal or open carry but what’s the point if the cops don’t respect the constitution. Are they just looking for cases to win and quotas to fill?
Coming up in a small Mississippi, I know exactly what you mean. The last incident a local cop pulled me over and said that I smashed the 8" concrete curb at the intersection just up the road. I pulled over into the gas pump since I was going there anyways, plus I knew I'd be on camera. He walks up to my door with that, I was driving a hyundai sonata at the time and anyone with any sense knows doing that would destroyed the car, it for sure wouldnt be driveable. Told him I'm certain that I didn't hit it and said I want to look at it. Obviously I found no damage, he didn't walk around the car with me I might add. Then, he asks if I'd been drinking and that he smells alcohol. Told him no, and said the only alcohol I have is this hand sanitizer. I offered to do a sobriety test before he replied because I could tell something was going on with him. Passed just fine, and he left. I pumped gas and went back home. That's a fairly mild story out of all the experiences I've had down there. These days there's a lot of new faces on the force down there, young transplants from up north or out west, you name it. Hopefully the old ways will change.
Ever notice, that the net results of a typical Lindsey Graham snit du jour is a ZERO?!
We would all like to see this addressed!! The Harris County, Texas Revolving Door is a terrible tragedy!!!
Large prisons, filled with giant hamster wheels, linked to the energy grids, and then inmates put to work.
The energy generated would fund the project.
Wouldn't work. With all the people in prison you'd have a surplus of generation capacity with a lack of demand (electrical supply just doesnt work like that as it needs balanced generation/demand), especially if they follow through with ending the catch and release or revolving door policy as discussed.
Since every congress member takes an Oath to uphold and protect the Constitution, wouldn't that mean that the congressmen/woman that voted and passed a bill going against gun rights, Free Speech etc. would be in violation of the Constitution, meaning they broke their Oath. Thats not upholding nor protecting the Constitution. You violated your Oath and should be removed. IMO
What he said about the second amendment is all true , but he forgot the most important and main reason the second amendment was written and specifically states Shall Not Be Infringed , so the people of this great nation can protect ourselves from a tyrannical government , which is exactly what we have going on this very minute in our country .
Yes. Remember the King Of England. This is why the People have the 2 ADMENDMANT.
So the "People"can protect themselves from the Government.
Seems like its getting close to that time.
Replies deleted.
'Arms' doesn't entirely mean a gun either!
Tyrannical government wasn't a reason the 2nd was written either!
People just make excuses to suit themselves to what they think it means!
@TA29
Self defense was.the reason for the 2A. And that is defense from ALL.including a tyrannical government. Remember they had just finished fighting a war against that very thing.
@@johnc6738 Self defense ....for the 'security of a free state'. The US had NO standing army so 'the people' were to become the army 'the militia'.
It doesn't state 'all' as any means of defense from! That's an opinion of interpretation of what today's people what it to be!
The 2nd doesn't reference 'tyrannical government', that's an opinion. It doesn't mention 'self protection'..against a criminal, that's also an opinion. It doesn't mention any type or what type of 'arms'....
Interpretations of what the 2nd "could" have meant back in the day are just that!
It's an 18th century law that no other rich country has in their constitutions and to what this relic law has given the USA and it's division of people and the crime wave of what is .......the USA today!
It is not the duty of a government to protect citizens. It is the responsibility of the individual citizen to protect themself and their loved ones.
5:34 "The reason so many are buying gun is because they've lost faith in their government to protect them."
That is only scratching the surface.
It actually goes much farther than that.
The reason so many are buying gun is because they have a realistic fear that their government will cause them harm under color of law.
Stop punishing law abiding citizens and start enforcing the laws and lock up criminals.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!! PERIOD!!!
We need less laws. Yet, we need more criminals held accountable for their crimes.
Shocking how the Republicans allow full answers to questions even though it eats up their time.
Why does anyone have to say "thank you for the question"? The only reason they are there is to hear a question!
Sounds like common sense to me. To bad the common sense is being educated out of people by academics.
Absolutely!!!!!
Yes, the "revolving doors policy" is VERY MUCH A PROBLEM! DUH!!!🙄
I should remind everyone prision is supposed to be a place where people go and gain insight, abilities to further themselves. Not become a revolving door.
It should be a place of reform, it need to teach life skills and improve the incarcerated person. Not just be a place they can use for actual slave labour and incarceration for profit. Countries that have actually used prisons for reform are closing them down as they have prison populations so small it's only for the criminally insane types.
@@JosephKano most of these individuals here don’t get the point of prisions m
We should be so lucky to have as many car owners to be as responsible as the legal gun owners in America are!! Imagine how much safer our roads would be! Statistically we have far more injuries and deaths from car owners than we do LEGAL gun owners! If the judicial system would enforce the laws we all would be a lot safer!
"Statistically we have far more injuries and deaths from car owners than we do LEGAL gun owners!"
The guy next door to me asked me to tell you that you don't understand statistics at all.
He wanted you to know that he had taken is 5yo son on at least 2,000 car trips and the last one was only 10 days ago
When they got home he sat his son in front of the television and rushed to the bathroom
While sitting there he heard a loud gun shot
He ran out to where his son was and found him dead
In his haste to use the bathroom, he left his gun where his son was able to reach & grab it
His 5yo boy had taken 2,000+ car trips & survived
But only pulled ONE trigger, HIS LAST ONE
I tend to agree with him, you REALLY DON'T understand statistics at all!!
This little boys plight is not an anomaly as 2 children 5yo & younger blow their brains out every single day in the USA after finding daddy's loaded & unsecured gun.
@@extremeknucklehead3637 Makes sense that the guy named knucklehead wouldnt understand statistics.
@@extremeknucklehead3637 It is a horrible thing to have to bury a child. The guy next to you has my condolences.
The NRA put together a kid's gun safety program called "Eddie Eagle". It has four simple steps. It does not sanction the child handling the firearm or condone the child even touching the firearm.
The four steps are:
1) *STOP!*
2) *DON'T TOUCH*
3) Leave the area
4) Tell an adult
I am not a fan of the NRA. Their fundraisers tried to shame me, an unemployed unemployable disabled veteran with no money, into donating to them at an unsustainable level. I will give the devil his due and say that Eddie Eagle is worthwhile.
@@extremeknucklehead3637
Out of those 2,000+ car trips, how many times did the child drive? Zero? Regardless of statistics, those are two incomparable scenarios.
One involves the child never actually handling the machine in question - the only similarity between the two is that the child has no knowledge of how to properly operate the machine.
Yet the ATF bother people with no criminal record. 😂
I was just waiting for her to blame wHiTe sUpReMaCy.
Where's Hunter Biden?
who gives a rat's ass?
Who's Hunter Biden?
Where are your psych meds?
Someone who committed a felony with a firearm
He's trying to find his laptop.
Damn right for a change RINO Senator Graham. Now get us out of Ukraine.
Sorry you think thinking for yourself and not blindly towing a party line constantly and trying to work with the opposition which is a necessary evil is being a "RINO". Im sure being blindly loyal to one single politician and putting a party over the American people is way better. Sitting in congress getting nothing passed just drawing a fat paycheck because you have to argue and be confrontational for every single issue with the opposite side, just because theyre the enemy, so you automatically have to disagree instead of working together for the good of the people on the few issues you actually can come to agree on, is what you really want from congress? What happened to politicians actually having skills like negotiating, too much of a swamp for you? And btw ukraine is putting us in at extremely advantageous strategic position that normally would require trillions of dollars spent over decades to attain otherwise, that allows us to circumvent having a useless coward in office who normally wouldnt even have done a single positive thing for this country, at least we can get one win in between him allowing us to be humiliated constantly until we can get an actual leader in charge. So now we can focus on the big enemy without the eurocucks betraying us and getting stabbed while our back is turned fighting china. You understand that backing ukraine with all this money gives us massive global leverage and influence that benefits all Americans, and makes the europeans actually somewhat get their head out of their ass and stop leeching off us, for basically peanuts, right?
Why is there larpers from the US over there larping like Ukraine is? Jeez,just how big does a movie set have to be?
No new laws, get rid of BS laws, and use the ones you got that work!
Judges and Parole boards should be made criminally liable for offences committed by people they release from jail. That would immediately end this leniency.
The 2A is absolutely Absolute because when Tyrnnay becomes law rebellion becomes duty..
Stacie, a stolen election in Athens TN in Aug.1946 caused a 6 hour gun battle & use of dynamite at a police station to retrieve the stolen ballot boxes & brought justice in 1946 America. A 1992 movie on you tube titled An American Story about this true story incident!!
@@RonSafreed Thanks for the movie. Wow
Want to fix gun crime?
Fix social breakdown. Fix fatherless. Eliminate no-fault divorces. Encourage more men to go to college. Stop giving money to universities. Keep criminals in prison. Teach men to be men. Stop infringing on the 2A.
Unfortunately I don’t know how much college is an answer anymore
Nah b...can't teach a man to be a man when you're teaching him in kindergarten that he should be changing his gender...
I would argue "stem trades" because we will have to build our way out of this one. Everything else is correct, with the addition of mandatory paternity tests before signing and psych evals upon divorce for appropriate reason. 304 phase is gonna cry, so be prepared to have the community hold her responsible and report back. Never trust what a woman says. It's her nature to lie and cry to obtain her will.
It's been said that when seconds count, the police are only minutes away...
Nice to see young guys standing up. Well done.
Total truth in the very last statement. 🛡️
Enforce the laws that already exist, we don't need more laws!
"KEEP ON KEEPIN ON"
ANY law is only effective when "_enforced._ Therein lies the rub.
Good citizens are buying firearms because when seconds count LEO will be there in 15 or 20 minutes, maybe?
Great clip. Some reality coming to light
If you ever trusted the government at all, your history teacher failed you
Charge Judges and all involved in allowing criminals out!!
Note to the Justice system: if you people don't take care of the problem, and apparently do not care or can't take care of this problem, then "the justice system" is leaving the problem to "we the people"
Vigilantism is coming back! The problem will be dealt with one way or another!
My grandmother told me a story about city inaction on a murderer who put dynamite in firewood killing several people - he was swung from a tree limb and the problem was over, the town folk also burned down his house and barn after finding a box of dynamite in his barn. This was about c 1900, sad but true.
@@jamesmoore9511 sad that leaders weren't leading
Can't lose what you never had, Mr Graham.
...put simply. It is incredible that the right to defend oneself is questioned.
Wouldn't it be cool if when democrats were questioned they would just give factual replies just like the people did in this hearing instead of acting like they don't know the answers or just plain ol dodge the questions and ramble on about jibberish
Right he was a danger to others. Most Americans are not a danger to others ! Gun Control is not for You to decide. It is a GOD given right as all of our Rights are GOD given…..Not Man Given !!!!!
A vehicle in the wrong hands can lead to a death. What's your point? A fork can lead to obesity, a high contributor to death. Where does it stop?
I beg to differ! I believe more Americans are MOST DEFINITELY a greater dangerous threat WITH a gun then without one! 😂
Anyone that invokes "GOD" in the 21st century belongs in psych ward for the remainder of their natural life.
I agree but it looks like the admin is importing violence.
@@amiehulscher7156so hypothetically, a man breaks into your house with bad intentions towards you you’d prefer not to have the ability to protect yourself or your children, brilliant!
I for one never lost faith in the government ability to protect me and mine. I never entertained such an expectation.
My wife, who has never had any interest in firearms, but is smart enough to think for herself and to see what is happening in this nation, asked me a couple month ago to help her find an appropriate firearm for herself. We found one she felt most comfortable with and has been able to shoot it really well. She recently went to get her concealed carry permit and has signed up for her very first basic firearms training class. I could always teach her myself, but I know I will never be as good as an actual firearms instructor. Believe it or not, she is a registered democrat and I’m very proud of her for not allowing herself to be swept by the democratic current that is plaguing this nation.
I don't rely on the government to protect me....
Who cares about who owns how many gun? We all have the right to own guns!!!
Thank you!
How do you get the gun violence up if you don’t let violent offenders loose on society?
When help is minutes away, seconds count.
You almost got it😂
“ when seconds count, the police are just minutes away“
That last line. Boom. It's really that simple. If government won't protect us, we have to protect ourselves, and more people are waking up to that.
Law and Order. Can we bring that back? When or who said this is not necessary?
There are days when Graham makes sense then there are days when he says stupid things like We need to give the Biden crime family the benefit of the doubt that erases everything he said before !
Grahm is swamp, it will never matter how good his acting skills are, everyone knows!
He’s still better than the alternative of a democrat
One of my collateral duties as an E5 in the Navy was a job called "Prison Guard Escort" which meant I was taking my fellow shipmates to court for speeding tickets and what have you. In most cases the Judge would ask me what kind of sailor was so-and-so. I would always answer honestly. One Judge commented that he for once would like to hear the truth about a sailor and not just the "he is a good sailor" that he always seems to hear. Well the sailor I had with me that day was a good sailor, he worked in my shop and I could always rely on him when I needed something to get done. I told the Judge I will always tell the truth on the matter. Well fast forward a few months and I have another visit in front of the same Judge and with one of my not so reliable guys. He caused a 4 car wreck because he had to race a semi and merge in front of it, ran out of room and messed up the day of several people. Anyway when I was asked what I thought of this sailor, I told the Judge that I have seen better, this guy requires constant prodding to get work done, that is if he can be found on the ship and his work is usually substandard at best. 100% the truth. The sailor was pissed at me, and the Judge said something along the lines of you were not kidding last time I saw you. My shipmate got stuck with the fines, as he should have, and we went back to the ship. He tried to file a complaint about me, but the DIVO just told him that I told the truth and if he didn't like it, he needed to change.
Repeat criminals let out on small bonds or completely scotch free is a bigger threat than any individual hun could ever be. I train with my firearms not because I have an agenda, but because I have a will to live and if my government is going to give the criminals more freedoms than the victims…. I better make sure I’m well prepared
his last statement is the true reason !!!
I’ve always owned “weapons” for protection of my family, loved ones and property, for the simple fact law enforcement has been reduced to report takers *AFTER* a crime has been committed.
That’s exactly right. The police are nothing more than armed historians, who show up after the fact and record what happened
I have lost faith in our government to do much of anything that is good for the American people.