I am a Japanese person who uses poco f6 pro.This smartphone has gaming performance comparable to the iPhone 16 at this price.The camera is also excellent.Xiaomi's HYPER OS is not only very similar to the APPLE OS UI, but also has the excellent customizability that is typical of Android.The build quality is also very high, and the cost performance is probably the best ever.The only thing it's inferior to compared to APPLE is its waterproof performance.
U seem to forget that the phone is performance oriented and not a camera centric phone . Like u said it's definitely a mid ranger and unfair to compare it with a 999$ phone
@@Hajang538 But… they’re selling it at $999 AUD, which is why I feel the comparison is fair. And as noted, the performance is good; if that’s all you want it is worth considering.
Fake review. Main camera on the Poco F6 Pro is better than main camera on Pixel 8a, in night conditions sometimes even better than 15 pro max, Alischan review, end of story.
@@emulzn87 No, nothing faked here, but thanks for your input. Everything presented here is as the Poco F6 Pro shot it, end of story. I’d certainly take the 8a over it for camera (my review here: ua-cam.com/video/jjR2T7v0XHc/v-deo.htmlsi=mWNybJa6YmIwKR9u) though clearly the Poco’s processor is nippier - as noted in this very review you decry as “fake”. Which it is not, but I guess slinging mud is easier, isn’t it?
@@AlexKidman 1. Alischan review: F6 Pro vs 15 pro max, live comparison, same conditions. 2. TechEdit: Pixel 8a vs Poco F6 Pro Dual Review. ;) 3. POCO F6 Pro review - $499 Flagship Killer! Versus review ;)
You’re under no obligation to agree with my review, that’s fine. But calling it fake is just insulting to the work put into it, and I’m standing by my conclusions and the results I got during my testing. That’s what my response was discussing.
Thankyou for your three meaningless words. As below, I stand by my review, done honestly and openly, but this is the Internet; a certain amount of cheap mudslinging is to be expected.
Hmm. Not exactly true though -- the phone's always in shot when I am -- but i'll try to turn what can't help but feel like a personal attack (if you have to open with "no offense but..." then you KNOW you're actually being offensive) into a positive: What more would you like to have seen? The phone is shown, tested, I give my assessment of it. But I am open to constructive criticism where it's constructive.
@@AlexKidman of course the product, don't get me wrong i like your channel! plus I have gained absolutely Nothing by attacking you (personally) but a shot back from you though. lol
I am a Japanese person who uses poco f6 pro.This smartphone has gaming performance comparable to the iPhone 16 at this price.The camera is also excellent.Xiaomi's HYPER OS is not only very similar to the APPLE OS UI, but also has the excellent customizability that is typical of Android.The build quality is also very high, and the cost performance is probably the best ever.The only thing it's inferior to compared to APPLE is its waterproof performance.
Omae wa mo shindeiru
@@xwjkzuasuazkx-03829 🙄🩸
11:30 to be correct Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS
Is this phone working after telstra 3g shutdown? Thanks
U seem to forget that the phone is performance oriented and not a camera centric phone . Like u said it's definitely a mid ranger and unfair to compare it with a 999$ phone
@@Hajang538 But… they’re selling it at $999 AUD, which is why I feel the comparison is fair. And as noted, the performance is good; if that’s all you want it is worth considering.
it is $999 in Australia you pay that much here so you should compare it to the same price range of the phone what don't you get here?
@@1saak1 well too bad for you than. Out here it's priced decently around 400+$ only
Fake review. Main camera on the Poco F6 Pro is better than main camera on Pixel 8a, in night conditions sometimes even better than 15 pro max, Alischan review, end of story.
@@emulzn87 No, nothing faked here, but thanks for your input. Everything presented here is as the Poco F6 Pro shot it, end of story. I’d certainly take the 8a over it for camera (my review here: ua-cam.com/video/jjR2T7v0XHc/v-deo.htmlsi=mWNybJa6YmIwKR9u) though clearly the Poco’s processor is nippier - as noted in this very review you decry as “fake”. Which it is not, but I guess slinging mud is easier, isn’t it?
@@AlexKidman
1. Alischan review: F6 Pro vs 15 pro max, live comparison, same conditions.
2. TechEdit: Pixel 8a vs Poco F6 Pro Dual Review. ;)
3. POCO F6 Pro review - $499 Flagship Killer! Versus review ;)
You’re under no obligation to agree with my review, that’s fine. But calling it fake is just insulting to the work put into it, and I’m standing by my conclusions and the results I got during my testing. That’s what my response was discussing.
in the middle of buying a phone now, replacing an S9 ive had for years now
Fake review indeed
Thankyou for your three meaningless words. As below, I stand by my review, done honestly and openly, but this is the Internet; a certain amount of cheap mudslinging is to be expected.
no offense but we see more of your face than the phone itself.
Hmm. Not exactly true though -- the phone's always in shot when I am -- but i'll try to turn what can't help but feel like a personal attack (if you have to open with "no offense but..." then you KNOW you're actually being offensive) into a positive: What more would you like to have seen? The phone is shown, tested, I give my assessment of it. But I am open to constructive criticism where it's constructive.
@@AlexKidman of course the product, don't get me wrong i like your channel! plus I have gained absolutely Nothing by attacking you (personally) but a shot back from you though. lol