Support me at: Buymeacoffee: buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope Patreon: www.patreon.com/scienceisdope_ Nas IO: nas.io/scienceisdope (For joining my whatsapp community) YT Membership: ua-cam.com/channels/g--ENXdDpXh5LyLigolg2g.htmljoin UPI: scienceisdope@icici (QR Code available on www.scienceisdope.com/support )
Bhai bas bohot ho gaya ab me bhi mera yt channel kholke pseudoscience failane walo ki lunga 😢 kab tak bas dekhta hi rahu. Haa bas pehle iit bombay chala jau 😂
Why everything in India is anti science 😂 Not gonna lie this gives Us huge Eage Over them through scientific thinking we can make our life better, richer etc whereas they will be fooled around.
Desperately proving a religion scientific means that people are losing faith over that religion, so one tries to fit science in a particular "faith" to make it sound modern. Unfortunately, this is the case of India.
Sorry, can't talk of other religion but in this land science and religion always coexisted with eachother. There is a reason why our land was called devabomi - the land of knowledge. I often see people telling science made us think logically. If not all, the science which was already discovered as a part ancient science was supposed to be rediscovered by the modern science and who knows there are more which are written in Sanskrit which are yet to be decoded from the scripts. Not all great things which are known to the world are discovered by Indians but all great things which are discovered by Indians are not known to the world.
@@Comicscene.7289 "Religion" and "science" are modern concepts, in fact this lexicon entered the English language during British colonialism. These words are not found even in Shakespeare's English.
Bhai actually tera comment stupid hai tu zara dubara padh usey. Aur compare kar uska actual content dekh ke. Vo spiritual, deep meaning behind mythology, unki life me significance, etc ki baate karta hai. Ye sab nahi jo tu bak raha hai
Aise hi log hote hai IITs me jo rational mindset rakhte hai naki tumhare jaise jo bina sir per ki baatein maan lete hai Edit: I am very sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about Pranav that he wasted an IIT seat but then I realised he is from NIT Calicut and you are talking about that Hyper quest guy who is actually from IIT Patna and yeah you are right he wasted an iit seat 😂. I did not know that the hyper quest guy is from an IIT. Man even IIT graduates are shitposting nowadays! I thought you were talking about Pranav wasting an IIT seat. Sorry for confusion
Why these creaters are trying to combine religion and science... I am always fascinated by our ancient Indian scripters. That doesn't mean I should believe every thing written... I like the fact they were able to think so deeply about so many things.. I practice my rituals because it connects me to my roots, to my culture... it doesn't mean I can't Question it...and modify it if necessary.. because that is our tradition.... Science is not about believe. It is about proofs and facts.. we need it to survive in the real world.
@@akshaymudia5421 no , one who is curious about true science will never watch them, but people who is of a certain religion, popularise it and will try to be liberal in front of world
As Richard Feynman said "You can't prove a vague theory wrong". This is the reason these influencers exists in the time of internet where there is only consumption and 0% processing.
Why is this Hindi heartland so so fanatic even phd guys speak polemics and half cooked conspiracy theories of Indian superiority and innocence whereas people from South are mostly chill friendly and non communal
@@maaz87Have you ever been to Northeastern states or the far northern states like Himachal? Its not Hindi, its the number of people who live in that region. More people are harder to manage. (People from the south are not chill btw that's a bit of an over generalization. Humans are humans at the end of the day.)
@@maaz87 A good chunk of these states's population lives in Poverty. Religion combined with poverty can create a very dangerous environment. These people have nothing to stand on except religion and so they cling to their religion and get very insecure about it, I am talking about Muslims here as well. One good thing the southern states have achieved is their low poverty percentages. They give me hope that one day the same can happen in other states as well.
HyperQuest is a creator who knows how much money one can earn in convincing Indians of pseudoscience. He is a product of a people blindly believing in stuff that keeps their faith relevant in modern times.
I'm an atheist but most of the translations of the verse "Asato Ma Sadgamaya" are what Hyperquest mentioned. Yk that "In the beginning, there was existence and non-existence". I might stand corrected but I looked up some relatively unbiased sources for the translations, and all of them pointed towards what Hyperquest translated to. Even Wikipedia does. Not that it determines anything lol cuz it's pretty obvious, but I'm just saying. Didn't find anywhere about the "from ignorance, lead me to truth".
Check declassified document by US state intelligence : Hemi Sync. Research on technology induced meditative states. Corroborates with experiences mentioned in ancient Hindu and Buddhist texts. The research towards the end explicitly states "Expect encounters with non corporeal intelligent beings".
I know how to read sanskrit and the translation is असतो मा सद्गमय तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय मृत्यो: मा अमृतं गमय O God lead me from untruth to truth . Asto असतो means untruthful. Ma means to me. Sat means truth Gamay means lead. ( Lead me from fraud and deception to a life based on truthfulness .) तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय Tamaso means darkness Jyoti means light O God lead me from darkness to light ( Help me to get rid of the darkness , the bad qualities with in me ) मृत्यो: मा अमृतं गमय Mrityo means from death Amritam means eternity O God lead me from death to immortality. ( Guide and assist me to achieve eternity). Let there be peace, peace and peacefulness ओम् शान्ति: शान्ति: शान्ति:
bro no hate but however goofy HyperQuest's videos are, the translation of Satt and Asatt he did is right, you are comparing two different words. In Sanskrit the sentences are formed differently then you might in English grammar, often times just like in English language Sanskrit too has words with multiple meanings that only could be understood when read with its context
@@smellyfut4277Welcome to agnosticism. Just like nothing is fixated in science similar things can be said about religions. Science had good teachers for proof,
8:17 brother sat means existence and sat is the word used for the nirgun(without any qualities) nirakar(without form) nirvikar(that who doesnt change) bramhn and knowledge of this sat is considered as the topmost knowledge in Sanatana dharma thats why in asato ma sadgamaya sat and asat were used as knowledge and ignorance.
Even if it not scientific but it's still astonishing that some people thousands of years ago wrote that thing which matches these concepts philosophically.
Nope! They are trying to forcefully match it . Everything written in scriptures is just like predictions made by astrologers which can apply to anything.if you will read those scriptures without thinking that anything is encoded there then then it will make more sense and you will find that it was based on old people's thinking and portray their imagination. People like hyper quest try to intentionally interpret those words in wrong sense to fill false pride to his subscribers. It itself is amazing that people at that time were imaginative
But these are really vague reference which just seem to match the modern scientific theories in the hindsight, that too only if you look at them that way. If you read them directly (without knowledge about Science) you won't be able to figure it out and would assume that they are using metaphors for something that happens and is useful in our day to day life.
I searched on Google nasadiya sukta first shloka and it showed exact same meaning as hyperquest. Then why is Pranav is saying that he choose meaning of those words according to his narrative?
Respected Pranav, I am one of the rare visitors to your UA-cam channel. I will be very much obliged to know that you carefully went through this message upto the conclusion, and apprehended my words. In this video you exemplified a video from the channel Hyper Quest, and tried to explain how the claims from that content creator about Vedas to be scientific is kind of a hoax. Your basic arguments were, » The failed theory of Big Crunch » The liberal interpretations of verses » The oversimplified descriptions First let me inform you that I am a theist, and you can rely on my words to be “slang free". First of all, the theory of a Big Crunch is a failed theory indeed. And the Vedas, especially the Rigveda states that the world operates in cyclic order. Now, if the Big Crunch theory doesn't go with this, then it can be believed that the cycle in Vedas refers to the cycles of life & death, or rise and demolition of civilizations rather than a universal cycle. And some of the philosophies describe the origin of the universe as non-cyclic as well. Some say the universe is one of the bubbles in the multiversal ocean. Some say it's made up of two pre-existing components. Some of them state that a universe dies and gives birth to a daughter universe, and according to some it is just what it is, forever existing. These are just some hypotheses, all had the same preciousness, and none of them were like “this is the only truth”. They were flexible. Also, the verses, both of you are onto, are from the part of the Rigveda named “Nasadiya Sukta". And I think at least verses from that part don't deserve the adjectives “mystical aspect" or “divine creation" etc. Because the “Nasadiya Sukta" later itself asks the reader “Who created the world?” “Is there a creator at all?” It literally doubts the existence of God. Well, let's move on. You quoted the part where he says “Sat” means existent and “Asat” the opposite, and argued back that it's a liberal interpretation. According to you, Sat and Asat as per “Asatō Mā Sadagamayaṁ" (in the movie Matrix) probably mean honesty (or knowledge) and dishonesty. It made me real upset. After all, an irrelevant Hollywood movie caption cannot be an authentic translation of an Indian or Sanskrit phrase. What would it cost to Google it? Sat literally means existence, reality, truth. And Asat the opposite. And yes, “Asatō mā sadagamayaṁ” means “Promote me from non-existence to existent reality”. And the Vedic verse as well, says that neither existence nor even non-existence prevailed before the world. After that, you doubted about the description of no day and night being existent. You asked the reason, if it was meant to convey the information of no light and no darkness, why was it so oversimplified like “no day and no light". As much as I tried to go through the context, kids were sent to Gurukul at that time at the age of five to six. And this part of the Rigveda is one of the starting chapters. So, if a teacher or Guru wanted to make the students understand about the pre-BigBang ambience, he just couldn't say that there was no light and no darkness. Because that 5-6 years old kid was never going to get what it was like. He/she didn't even know what the properties of light are! So, as a simile, the phrase “no light no darkness" was used. I think I am able to make clear what my arguments are. I also tried to be as civil as possible for me, and I would like people in the reply to behave the same.
Don't try it bro. He's too egoistic and straight up a con man. Half his "refutations" can be refuted with a little bit of research and pre study and knowledge of Sanskrit. These are the same ppl who equate Vedic Texts with Harry Potter. He simply wants to be an internet meme. Let him be so
@@vishnusankeerth9436 I m a believer as well as a seeker. Few days back I used to feel like atheists r genuinely seekers who r ready to accept the truth. But from last 2-3 days I have noticed they r just like orthodox who don't want to be questioned (even humbly). Like there r 80-100 replies on the comment where this pranav is being praised but not even a single so called atheist replied this guy, and I feel this is the time for me to accept that actual atheists r really in small number in INDIA and a large chunk of them is just 'muhchor'.
@@SWAYAM_HAI_HAM Exactly my words bro. They will oppose each and every thing in religion till their last breath. They just don't want to look at the other side. I am agnostic but I feel that most people who proclaim themselves as rational atheists are actually not rational.
As someone who has read the vedas , people need to understand that they are and were never science books . They just contain hymns and lores of ancient elemental gods like Agni etc . And Some philosophical questions and ideas ....Nothing else . Vedic society was a primitive and somewhat tribal society . That hyperquest guy completely takes those hymn out of context .
Do some research on Indian grammarians you won't be able to say that Vedas have only philosophical ideas and no one tries to merge science and religion the very core of learning concepts of Sanskrit is to ask yourself how it's possible that's the only reason why still Astadhayi stands out even morden linguistic's around the world cannot match the work of panini
@@brijeshtripathi3607the thing is they are the subscribers of the cult named science , Filled with prejudices , believe random paper written by random person , but believing scripture is unscientific
Lol you are speaking like a professor and age old preacher of vedas, let me ask you just one question about vedas - who or which rishi proponded most brahmanas or shakha branches in recent time? If you cant answer this then you can try for this: What it means about a mention of rishi on every specific ved mantra, what contribution that rishi gave about the particular mantra?
I just love science and sometimes i doubt myself if i am wrong for disagreeing so much of the myth going around me or if i am wrong and the myth as it could be correct. But listening to you gives me so much reassurance and i just keep loving science more. Thank you.
I was waiting for this. My friend once showed his channel to me saying see how scinetific our hindu relgion is. I immediately told him science and philosophies are two different things. Science is evidence based and we also can apply it on our practical life for variuos things but not same for philosophies.
Hinduism doesn't discuss life but it does discuss the beginning of the universe and it is right There is no liberal interpretation here, sat refers to reality the brahm and asat is non reality and brahm is only true existence
"Nah, that guy's smart, exploiting and pandering to sheep. Like, what do you think our general populace wants to see and hear? Things that challenge their views or thing's that reinforce them?"
He's actually a smart guy, he used to do book reviews, but once he made a video about some scripture, his video gained around 10x more views than average and for money and views he sacrificed his integrity.
lol you need to learn the difference between grha and planet both aren't same.. sanatan reveals and vigyan darshan (streamed with an IITian) has already explained that difference.
Nah not a good argument. Grah or planet had different definations before, it comes from grahm means "one that meander" so whatever was meandering in sky too fast, was Planet for them. With modern definations we have better defination. Just like just some decades ago Pluto was a planet too, defination was updated then it was not.
@@Sanatani_Atullthen tell your sanatani brothers to not say all 9 plants were discovered by india when it had only discovered sun, moon as planet (as they claim it as planet), and visible planets at that time (no light population)
I am so glad I found this. I continue to tell people that lot of credibility to Indian science and mathematics ia there historically. But claiming that we knew airplane mechanism, aerodynamics, quantum physics or calculus its like saying I know how to run a Michelin star restaurant just because my forefathers said they knew how to boil water and they wrote a vague letter hypothesising the boiled water idea. 😒
Reservation in present form is actually hypocrisy. Why do you think if somebody's parents have already got reservation and uplifted their economic status still needs reservation? Why does the opposition opposes the creamy layer concept in sc st reservation? That is opposition's minority appeasement. If you still support the 'present form' of reservation then either you are a hypocrite or an ignorant of social justice.
I'm so glad you made a video on this guy. He does need to be called out. While you made a video on only Rig Veda, I can assure you that he does the same thing in all of his videos. Also, he is a testament of the changing attitudes of the audience. He did make some rational topics in his earliest videos, but he soon turned to pandering to the majoritarian preferences. Unfortunately, I still continue watching his videos for guilty pleasure.
Its honestly frustrating when these religious unintellectual people make very vague claim that can't be disproved but also use the same vague claim to correlate with actual scientific discovery.
Religion has nothing to do with science; religion is the way to know oneself. Those who are claiming "my religion has something to do with modern science" are totally wrong. If science does not interfere with religion, religion should not interfere with science. (The religion that I'm talking about is totally different from what we call religion in today's sense.)
@@jaisharma2837 The science that I'm referring to is related to the physical world. Yes, I agree that knowing oneself is also a science but is not related to modern science. Psychology is a part of the social sciences not modern science.
I personally think there are many factors attached to Indian people believing in pages and videos trying to rationalise religion and spirituality from India without evidence. One I think is Colonial Inferiority which was created and carefully crafted by British and the education system they brought in which negated a lot of our evidence based and scientific discoveries as inferior. This was to an small extend even continued after Independence wherein our evidence based scientific and mathematic discoveries weren't given priority for example the lack of more study on the work of Aryabhatta or Kerala School of Mathematics. Second aspect is our cognitive biases which tends to discredit our scepticism of our religion perceived role in science. This is just my hypothesis and great work Pranav especially your main Channel Science is Dope and your revamped DD Rational
All they have to legitimise themselves is to show something that research is still going on, like quantum theory of gravity. I wonder why they can't do that, and only chose things that are already widely popular
Yeah that's what I am thinking, always big topics and and popular theory like multiverse, gravity, electricity, Atoms etc Never heard them talking about things that are not popular like fardays law, nuclear fission and fusion , Periodic table etc 🤔 🤔🤔
Dear Pranav: A beacon of reason! A stalwart of science and logic! A master of both the cosmos and ancient tongues... and a total UA-cam comments section heartbreaker !!! How could anyone neglect the profound insights offered by you dear Rationalist, Realist, Scientific, Non-Attention-Seeking, Respectful Representor, Astronomer and Sanskrit scholar. You must have been too busy pondering the mysteries of the universe while simultaneously translating ancient Sanskrit texts and calculating the trajectory of celestial bodies to bother with such trivial matters and respond to a UA-cam video dedicated in your honour by Sanatan Reveals. ua-cam.com/video/mI3SrNx1CKE/v-deo.html Why won't you grace Sanatan Reveals with your presence, oh Rationalist. Is it because you are too busy chilling in your logic lab, scoffing at the mystical like some kind of... Lion King Robocop. Come on, buddy or at least provide some entertainment for the peanut gallery. Your foresight is truly unparalleled, making you the Robocop of internet community. Last but not the least great creativity with the logo, Respect.
I have an opinion on why such videos get so many views. It is because most of the viewers of his (the hyper quest) channel haven't read the scriptures/texts from the primary sources, and are not very familiar with thd sanskrit language. Sanskrit uses many alankars like rūpak, upmā, which means it is very easy to misinterpret the text to mean something entirely different to what intended. I came to this conclusion after coming across Mr Nityānand Mṣra's channel.
@@日本語大好き DD stands For DoorDarshan. All the Channels belonging to DoorDarshan Starts with Initials DD Eg DD National DD News DD Bhakti etc So I'm asking can he Use DD in his Channel's Name ? isn't it Violation? Just like We Can't Use McD in Anything because It is Registered with McDonald's.
Amazing video! Great content! I learn a lot from you. Along with debunking pseudoscience, I suggest you to create more videos about different scientific discoveries and how scientists arrived at conclusions in those discoveries. This will help your viewers understand how scientists logically analyze evidence & data and think rationally to arrive at those conclusions.
8:30 Actually the literal translation of sat will be "that which is" and for asat it will be "that which is not" so when we say "asatoma sat gamaya" we in a sense mean "lead me from falsity to reality" since this world is said to be not actually existing/illusionary. The second verse "tamasoma jyotir gamaya" which means "lead me from darkness onto light" is often translated as "lead me from ignorance to the truth" As for them being based on context many words in many languages are based on context, like the hindi word "laga" it can mean "put" or brooming or lighting the cooker etc based on the sentence/context, "run" can also be an example. Context based words are part of language and don't really cause any problems. Also Sat and asat don't have loose meanings its just they are non-transaltables.
@@snehasingh4606In one of his most popular videos he says that hindu scriptures has concept of multiverse. Which in itself is false as they are connotations, nothing of value like orthogonality in phase space or probability density of wave function is mentioned in them. But the cherry on cake is that he himself says that in every universe dharma is established, which is absolute violation of the totalitarian principle. Their is your reasoning for why that statement is true.
I was Travelling by a Train few months back and there were 3 NIT*ians with me and we started to converse on few topics ranging from science to Social issues. They themselves accepted that they were miles away understanding many things in those aspects. Studying in IIT, NIT doesn't guarantee you knowledge, Scientific Temper and critical view on Society. I am not saying i am wiser than them academically but yes in critical viewing of things it's different.
Asato ma sadgamaya Tamasoma jyotirgamaya Mrityorma amritam gamaya🌹🌹 This verse was also in a Malayalam movie called Chintamani kolacase This stayed in my head all the time.
Yes i just check the translation of the nasadiya sukta from kramer's translation of the rv it says something like this There was neither non-existence nor existence then; Neither the realm of space, nor the sky which is beyond; What stirred? Where? In whose protection? There was neither death nor immortality then; No distinguishing sign of night nor of day; That One breathed, windless, by its own impulse; Other than that there was nothing beyond. So hyperquest was right in this regard
I do not support hyper quest but every translation i can find on internet translate it as "non-existence" and "existence" like from vivekananda. So it might be correct for hyper quest to translate those words as such but that does not mean those hymn talks about big bang.
@@DDRational_ can you explain how is it an interpretation rather than translation? I checked 3 translations of well known scholars 1) Kramer 2) Griffith 3) al balsham. All of them has translated them as existence and non existence
Might have been pretty hard for you to talk about Sanatan Reveals. Well, we do understand your pain. Since Our(atheist) buttocks has been stuffed pretty well by him. Take care of yourself my brother in science. Wait..... but science doesn't have the boundaries to differentiate brothers and sisters from others. Let's goooooooooooo babe.
Dude don't hate anime just because some religious blind person used it. It doesn't have anything to do with anime. don't hate like anything btuh@@kartik6023
I'm hundred percent sure you have not read any sutras. Take Surya siddhanta for example, they have poems in place of formulas that aid to calculate earth's rotation speed. It even gives a calculation to find earth's tilt (granted it's not the exact number as we know today, to have an accurate number thousands of years ago is an amazing achievement). सत् & सद् have different meaning when used in a sentence. How are you even comparing a Shanti mantra to a sutra? You ignore to dwell deep into the shloka because you don't understand it. Lastly, hyperquest didn't claim "scientists are discovering it now" crap, he simply says that this is seen in modern science as well. Vaisheshika sutra talks about atomic particles, obviously not as scientific as we know it today, but imagine someone actually having conversation on things like अणु ! It's clear you have a bias, do spend some time understanding what others are saying before you crap on them. Half of your video was your view and interpretation than showing the "truth"
I partially agree. But the credit shud not go to vedas. As vedas themselves mention civilisations that existed previously. (Dont come up with apaurusheya non sense as it has another meaning)
he isnt showing truths and stuff or claiming anything, he just targetted hyperquest and proved him wrong, he didnt even say anything about the religion also सत् & सद् dont have different meaning when used in that case, because it's a rule of sandhi where a vyanjan changes to the third vyanjan of it's own varg when a third vyanjan comes after it, which is why when doing sandhi सत् changes to सद् (d is third in tavarg)
@@smellyfut4277 again don't try it bro. This guy's simply a liar and a hypocrite All he knows is to scream evidence repeatedly without properly examining them. One should debate only when he's fully knowledgeable in both his and his opponents view, this guy's only knowledgeable in his own but doesn't think he should spent time studying other pov's before refuting them And then he has the Audacity to call himself a "free thinker"😂😂😂
@@vishnusankeerth9436 he isn't debating, he's debunking the other guy's claims. He's only analyzing the fallacious interpretations and analogies made by the other guy, for which he isnt required to be knowledgeable, only logical
@@smellyfut4277 He isn't being logical : Scientsists think a closed universe will behave in much the same way. Its expansion will slow down until it reaches a maximum size. Then it will recoil, collapsing back on itself. As it does, the universe will become denser and hotter until it ends in an infinitely hot, infinitely dense singularity. Or the Big Freeze scenario could happen, as the Universe keeps expanding on forever, and ever, and ever, and ever, until nothing but sub-atomic particles remain. So Science cannot prove what happened before or after this, cause they aren't this advancement. It’s funny how humans think they know about the universe. Who knows how the universe came to be. It could have always existed, an infinite plane of time, that never started, nor ever will end. It’s an idea people can’t even wrap their heads around. The whole Big Bang thing was a mere theory, calculated based on the universe’s expanding rate. We don’t even know if the Universe is infinite or finite, and there is no way to find a “starting point” on an infinite plane. Hell, the real answer is probably something humans can’t even begin to imagine, let alone theorize and figure out with science. And the funny thing is, no matter which theory you believe, all of it breaks current science anyway. If the Big Bang was real, then what was before it? Another universe? Nothing? Either way, there is no scientific explanation for why another universe would suddenly condense into the big bang, nor why matter would pop into existence. In other words, its either a never ending cycle with no beginning/ending, or a beginning that started from pure nothingness. Science cannot explain either. So neither can they disprove the Cyclic Universe, nor can they prove it. Some scientists accept it and some don't. He said how can words that are loosely translated give rise to anything scientific🤣. Welcome to sanatan dharma. He cannot accept that maybe we were right and he is wrong. This nasadiya suktam was translated literally thousands of years ago and passed down, when your science was still in its renaissance period🤣. He is trying to suggest that we copied science. Now who is older, the vedas or science? He says it is a liberal translation. He says why didn't we learn about the big bang from that verse🤣. Maybe cause you ignorant scientists were more foucsed on burning and trying to ruin the vedas and actually learn from them. If they actually tried to learn from them, the world would be quite different wouldn't it. Those who have studied the vedas, have actually verified how scientific it is. Just because it provides the answer without your scientific workings doesn't mean it is wrong. It is not a maths book where you must show working to score a mark. it is a religious book, which causally mentions some parts of science whilst trying to teach us about the glory of God. So he has completetely misunderstood religion. Next he starts waffling about the vedas was written by humans. He doesn't understand sanskrit. The verse is talking about God, and saying how he has always existed, and how before God created immortality and death, he was there. This verse is saying how before life and death, God was there. So where is he including science? This talks about God, not science. He doesnt look at the rest cause he knows it it true. He doesnt try and make it fit the big bang. He is explaining the commentary of rishis from thousands of years before. So if anything, the big bang is trying to fit this. We don't care about the big bang. We reject the big bang, so wtf is he saying about we are trying to fit the big bang. All religious people reject the big bang, we believe god made the universe, not two particles. Their modern science is based on observation. However what is in this sukta is not science. We don't care about science. This is religion. We don't need your equations and working out to prove something. Just because someone wrote something about the universe and people agree with it, doesn't mean it is science. THEY ALL COME FROM PRAYERS YOU FUKING IDIOTS, THEY ARE MEANT TO PRAISE GOD, NOT YOUR FUKING SCIENCE. All science eventually leads to the existence of God, so go home and live your life peacefully without tryna stress whether something correct is written in the vedas. This guy said scripture was learned from evidence, then written down. I don't think he even understands religion. You don't even need to Hindu to realise that this guy is chatting so much BS. He is boasting about what Science has done, with predictions. Well what do you think Sanatan Dharma has done? It is not a prediction because Hinduism believed this before science existed, thousands of years back in the vedic period. This bruddah talks about predictions. It is not a make a wish book. It is a scripture. Read the Surya Sidhanta, or other ones. It is not that because there is no working, the answer is discredited. So overall you are just an Ignorant being who is not aware of sanatan dharma. Nice
Pranav I would suggested u , make a whole length video on bang bang theory and how this universe came to an existence ....there's a hell lot of misconceptions buzzing on it 🤔
He is not wrong when he translates सत् as existence. सत् is the present participle of the verbal root अस्, which means "to exist". Thus, existing or existence. But often in Sanskrit and in every language around the world, semantics of a word can shift based upon context, in which case, सत् can also be translated as wisdom. But OF COURSE, that in no way validates Vedas being concurrent to modern science. 🤦♂️
The meaning of Sat and Asat hasn't changed in both the sholkas. The meaning of Sat and Asat is Real and unreal respectively so "Asatoma sadgamaya" means lead me from the Unreal to the real. And in Nasadiya suktam the meaning is also Real and unreal as Real means that which exists and unreal means that which doesn't. So the verse says there was no reality nor non reality. Pls consider replying
@@A_n.t_i.s_o.c_i.a_l engineering is not concerned with studying about diseases either. You can't make a steam engine with the knowledge of biology. Chemistry won't help you find the mass of sun. Philosophy thus, is not concerned about steam engines. Don't expect something to work in every field.
Also, these pseudoscientific creators will never give a rational explanation as to how the ancient people came up with conclusions by modern science. It is because the ancient people never had the technology to arrive at those conclusions. The truth is that without modern technology humans would have never arrived to those conclusions by modern science.
Most of the atheists miss out on heavy Contexts and leave the burden of proof on religion. The nasdiya sukt he mentioned was such a gem of sukt in Rigveda, which shows how humble a scripture can be in saying that we don't know the ultimate reality, we can guess and the biggest problem with atheists is trying countering religion solely on the basis of science which is actually not possible, bcs science and religion are different things, there r many things in religion which science doesn't deal with, like emotions stuff, morality, spirituality, Philosophy, etc then there are Yogic sciences, ppl would easily call it pseudoscience but that's the worst they can, pseudoscience is the most misused word today used to counter any spiritual teaching which has some element of science. Science is amazing definetly but doesn't hold the sole authority otherwise there won't have been any other subject. If you think or any atheist thinks religions don't have science that's true but that's not in the case of Hinduism. One has to give up their biases to understand what hinduism is. I have debated with sooo many ppl soo many atheists and i feel pity about their knowledge, most of the ppl who hop on the name of science are those who know it the least also same with the religious ppl, those who hop on the name of religion are mostly those who don't know religion. Tho your video is good but it has a lot of mistakes and falls out of context and place like the translation part that how do we know the right meaning, than u tried comparing with Quran, that's manipulation. Won't talk much about Big Crunch but i'd suggest learn about Vedant and if u r gutsy go expose it.
Yeah if some one believes so much in science then science doesn't have any cure for autoimmune diseases. They don't even know why exactly these diseases happen. Science doesn't believe in a person's emotions. Does that mean a person does not have any emotions? Even most of the calculations in science are based on assumptions.
@@humanbeing1551 that's y i worry about atheists, they come up with these logics. They don't know what god is, thry don't have idea about philosophy, they just straightaway reject things with flawed logic. L rationality
Hey pranav make a playlist of aall those videos on Indian geniuses , or mention that in description if it already exists. Itll be easy for us to watch them all
Absolutely wrong my dear. "Om tat sad iti nirdesho Brahmanas trividhah smrtah" bg 17.23 Om - the transcendental vibration Tat - that is Sat - eternal/ ultimate truth. These three are the names attributed to brahman. "Asato ma sadgamaya" Asat - which is not true (ignorance) Sat - true Lead me from ignorance to truth.
Bro again you didn't completely translate the Nasadiya Sukta. I think you need to learn vyakaran of the Sanskrit which is complicated and organised before debunking. I can post you the genuine link of translated Nasadiya Sukta. Regarding the same word with different meanings, these homographs exist in English Language too Eg: Space, Sow. Half knowledge is dangerous
Can you please make the video more elaborate, I get your point but you are finishing the things in a very shallow manner the topic on which Hyperquest has made the video is way different and in his video he is trying to make logical arguments about a philosophy instead of scientific argument. If you can understand the philosophy discussed in the video and present the counter arguments, that will be appreciated.
Thanks at least somebody tried to debunk him. He speaks whatever pseudoscience he wants and his followers (so called sanatani scientists) appreciate him daily for recovering their old-age heritage of science. Nobody to check whether they r right or wrong and also, they don't want to be. They're have debate in my house and at the end they quoted him with his video (which had no meaning but they're adamant that if he's providing from Hinduism only). Now I'm gonna quote your and Neil de grease Tyson's video as my reference 😁
Every religion deserves a tiny space for irrational beliefs. This helps people connect to something greater than themselves. If religions weren't irrational Jesus wouldn't have been able to walk on water, Quran wouldn't be the literal word of God and Krishna wouldn't have lifted the govardhan. Your videos seem very pointed only towards Hinduism because it is the easiest to criticize with little to no resistance or repercussions to what you say even though whatever you say might be scientifically sound. Also seems to fit the narrative of you being against political Hinduism which is taking India by storm (and rightfully so).
His videos are NOT about "Hinduism".. His videos are concentrated on India where Hindu superstitions prevail. If the video made by hyper quest would have been about Islam, I don't think he would step back from criticizing it..
Support me at:
Buymeacoffee: buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope
Patreon: www.patreon.com/scienceisdope_
Nas IO: nas.io/scienceisdope (For joining my whatsapp community)
YT Membership: ua-cam.com/channels/g--ENXdDpXh5LyLigolg2g.htmljoin
UPI: scienceisdope@icici (QR Code available on www.scienceisdope.com/support )
Poli video sirr.
Sir it's invite slaash physics
They too know they are reinterpreting thing to support science they do it to gain views and money that's it
@@ahmedmohiuddin4567yeah
Bhai bas bohot ho gaya ab me bhi mera yt channel kholke pseudoscience failane walo ki lunga 😢 kab tak bas dekhta hi rahu. Haa bas pehle iit bombay chala jau 😂
Pranav's day 100000000 of telling people what is the meaning of scientific😂
I swear
@@DDRational_ua-cam.com/users/shortsu8j5xB_KuC4?si=78K33UTnUS7oVfTs
Literally.
Exactly 💯
Damn
I was waiting for hyperquest to be awarded by modiji but fortunately, India's future is not that dark yet.
But ranveer and abhi&niyu got it
So it is in the dark
Why everything in India is anti science 😂 Not gonna lie this gives Us huge Eage Over them through scientific thinking we can make our life better, richer etc whereas they will be fooled around.
Yeah, still not at the level of Ranveer, bro needs to take his BS to the next level.
wait till he invites some cons to his podcasts.
@@bhupenderjangra7111abhi and niyu should be jailed
Desperately proving a religion scientific means that people are losing faith over that religion, so one tries to fit science in a particular "faith" to make it sound modern. Unfortunately, this is the case of India.
This is the case in whole world
This is happening everywhere people are justifying religion with science
Sorry, can't talk of other religion but in this land science and religion always coexisted with eachother. There is a reason why our land was called devabomi - the land of knowledge. I often see people telling science made us think logically. If not all, the science which was already discovered as a part ancient science was supposed to be rediscovered by the modern science and who knows there are more which are written in Sanskrit which are yet to be decoded from the scripts. Not all great things which are known to the world are discovered by Indians but all great things which are discovered by Indians are not known to the world.
@@Comicscene.7289
"Religion" and "science" are modern concepts, in fact this lexicon entered the English language during British colonialism. These words are not found even in Shakespeare's English.
@@parjanyashukla176there was not a lot of science during shakespeare's english, or ways to share knowledge.
Bhai actually tera comment stupid hai tu zara dubara padh usey. Aur compare kar uska actual content dekh ke. Vo spiritual, deep meaning behind mythology, unki life me significance, etc ki baate karta hai. Ye sab nahi jo tu bak raha hai
iit patna seat wasted successfully
Lots of IIT seats are getting wasted nowadays and lack of oppurtunities even for iitians now are making them do this pseudoscience stuff
Aise hi log hote hai IITs me jo rational mindset rakhte hai naki tumhare jaise jo bina sir per ki baatein maan lete hai
Edit: I am very sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about Pranav that he wasted an IIT seat but then I realised he is from NIT Calicut and you are talking about that Hyper quest guy who is actually from IIT Patna and yeah you are right he wasted an iit seat 😂. I did not know that the hyper quest guy is from an IIT. Man even IIT graduates are shitposting nowadays! I thought you were talking about Pranav wasting an IIT seat. Sorry for confusion
@@sire_99rational aur 😂 udat bandar 😂 religion mein Maan ne Wale 😂 lol
IITians are not scientific fanatics or robotic machines.
@@emotionaldamage5072 hehe
Why these creaters are trying to combine religion and science... I am always fascinated by our ancient Indian scripters. That doesn't mean I
should believe every thing written... I like the fact they were able to think so deeply about so many things.. I practice my rituals because it connects me to my roots, to my culture... it doesn't mean I can't Question it...and modify it if necessary.. because that is our tradition.... Science is not about believe. It is about proofs and facts.. we need it to survive in the real world.
They are doing it because it gives them views as audience loves to believe that we are superior one.
@@akshaymudia5421 no , one who is curious about true science will never watch them, but people who is of a certain religion, popularise it and will try to be liberal in front of world
@@ojassrivastava5066no one is trying to be liberal, it's now a derogatory term in India which everybody hates.
@@MohanPurohit-vp8hj rightist love to get western certification , they love to act liberal , like CAA
@@akshaymudia5421 so true
Just imagine this channel actually gets broadcasted nationwide calling out all the BS.
Half of the Indian youths become Atheist.
What is BS?
@@stepup6620 sand ki tatti (bullshit)
@@stepup6620bias
@@stepup6620 Baengn Sabji
As Richard Feynman said "You can't prove a vague theory wrong". This is the reason these influencers exists in the time of internet where there is only consumption and 0% processing.
The thing is that they speak in Hindi and hence audience from Hindi heartland. Please collaborate with someone like you from Hindi region.
Why is this Hindi heartland so so fanatic even phd guys speak polemics and half cooked conspiracy theories of Indian superiority and innocence whereas people from South are mostly chill friendly and non communal
@@maaz87Have you ever been to Northeastern states or the far northern states like Himachal?
Its not Hindi, its the number of people who live in that region. More people are harder to manage.
(People from the south are not chill btw that's a bit of an over generalization. Humans are humans at the end of the day.)
vimoh is making such content in Hindi
@@khanshiranyor3974 Humans are humans but there is so much communalism and cow lynching in Hindi cow belt and it rarely happens in other states ?
@@maaz87 A good chunk of these states's population lives in Poverty. Religion combined with poverty can create a very dangerous environment. These people have nothing to stand on except religion and so they cling to their religion and get very insecure about it, I am talking about Muslims here as well. One good thing the southern states have achieved is their low poverty percentages. They give me hope that one day the same can happen in other states as well.
HyperQuest is a creator who knows how much money one can earn in convincing Indians of pseudoscience. He is a product of a people blindly believing in stuff that keeps their faith relevant in modern times.
But Hyperquest guy is an IITian broh woh kaise galat ho sakta hn aur yah 2 Kodi ka pranav sahi kaise ho sakta hn 👹
@@SteveBreaksASMRsarcasm?
"Belief in Rebirth" is there in Buddhism right😅 its pseudoscience then remove the photo of Lord Buddha then
@@SteveBreaksASMR binladin bhi engineer tha 😂😂😂 aur billionaire bhi iit kya hi tha uske aaage
Lekin religious 😂shit kabhi baaz aa sakte hai kya😂
@@sumitdutta7043 your statement is false according to neo buddhists 😂
I'm an atheist but most of the translations of the verse "Asato Ma Sadgamaya" are what Hyperquest mentioned. Yk that "In the beginning, there was existence and non-existence". I might stand corrected but I looked up some relatively unbiased sources for the translations, and all of them pointed towards what Hyperquest translated to. Even Wikipedia does. Not that it determines anything lol cuz it's pretty obvious, but I'm just saying. Didn't find anywhere about the "from ignorance, lead me to truth".
Yes I pointed out the same thing.
But Pranab is ignoring my comment.😅
@@sumitdutta7043 pranav a missonary agent in India
Check declassified document by US state intelligence : Hemi Sync. Research on technology induced meditative states. Corroborates with experiences mentioned in ancient Hindu and Buddhist texts.
The research towards the end explicitly states "Expect encounters with non corporeal intelligent beings".
@@prasantapandaprasanta8824and you know that how?
I know how to read sanskrit and the translation is
असतो मा सद्गमय
तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय
मृत्यो: मा अमृतं गमय
O God lead me from untruth to truth .
Asto असतो means untruthful.
Ma means to me.
Sat means truth
Gamay means lead.
( Lead me from fraud and deception to a life based on truthfulness .)
तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय
Tamaso means darkness
Jyoti means light
O God lead me from darkness to light
( Help me to get rid of the darkness , the bad qualities with in me )
मृत्यो: मा अमृतं गमय
Mrityo means from death
Amritam means eternity
O God lead me from death to immortality.
( Guide and assist me to achieve eternity).
Let there be peace, peace and peacefulness
ओम् शान्ति: शान्ति: शान्ति:
Finally we have our Batman of rationality 😎🍿...... Great work Pranav in DD Rational... very creative
batman 😭😭😭😭
bro no hate but however goofy HyperQuest's videos are, the translation of Satt and Asatt he did is right, you are comparing two different words. In Sanskrit the sentences are formed differently then you might in English grammar,
often times just like in English language Sanskrit too has words with multiple meanings that only could be understood when read with its context
but the context can be distorted to mean anything that way which is how people like hyperquest even exist
@@smellyfut4277Welcome to agnosticism.
Just like nothing is fixated in science similar things can be said about religions. Science had good teachers for proof,
8:17 brother sat means existence and sat is the word used for the nirgun(without any qualities) nirakar(without form) nirvikar(that who doesnt change) bramhn and knowledge of this sat is considered as the topmost knowledge in Sanatana dharma thats why in asato ma sadgamaya sat and asat were used as knowledge and ignorance.
Different interpretations .One can debate about saanatana but others ???? Sar tan se judaa
that is satt, not sat
Even if it not scientific but it's still astonishing that some people thousands of years ago wrote that thing which matches these concepts philosophically.
@@Lmao-truth-5670 but there is mention of earth in those texts and they are talking about brahman (universe) in this so that can't be true.
This is something we need to appreciate, not try to shove science in places where it doesn't belong.
@@jamunaprasad5093you are assuming their concept and scope of our knowledge about universe is similar to ours.
Nope! They are trying to forcefully match it . Everything written in scriptures is just like predictions made by astrologers which can apply to anything.if you will read those scriptures without thinking that anything is encoded there then then it will make more sense and you will find that it was based on old people's thinking and portray their imagination. People like hyper quest try to intentionally interpret those words in wrong sense to fill false pride to his subscribers. It itself is amazing that people at that time were imaginative
But these are really vague reference which just seem to match the modern scientific theories in the hindsight, that too only if you look at them that way. If you read them directly (without knowledge about Science) you won't be able to figure it out and would assume that they are using metaphors for something that happens and is useful in our day to day life.
I searched on Google nasadiya sukta first shloka and it showed exact same meaning as hyperquest. Then why is Pranav is saying that he choose meaning of those words according to his narrative?
Respected Pranav,
I am one of the rare visitors to your UA-cam channel. I will be very much obliged to know that you carefully went through this message upto the conclusion, and apprehended my words.
In this video you exemplified a video from the channel Hyper Quest, and tried to explain how the claims from that content creator about Vedas to be scientific is kind of a hoax. Your basic arguments were,
» The failed theory of Big Crunch
» The liberal interpretations of verses
» The oversimplified descriptions
First let me inform you that I am a theist, and you can rely on my words to be “slang free".
First of all, the theory of a Big Crunch is a failed theory indeed. And the Vedas, especially the Rigveda states that the world operates in cyclic order. Now, if the Big Crunch theory doesn't go with this, then it can be believed that the cycle in Vedas refers to the cycles of life & death, or rise and demolition of civilizations rather than a universal cycle.
And some of the philosophies describe the origin of the universe as non-cyclic as well. Some say the universe is one of the bubbles in the multiversal ocean. Some say it's made up of two pre-existing components. Some of them state that a universe dies and gives birth to a daughter universe, and according to some it is just what it is, forever existing. These are just some hypotheses, all had the same preciousness, and none of them were like “this is the only truth”. They were flexible.
Also, the verses, both of you are onto, are from the part of the Rigveda named “Nasadiya Sukta". And I think at least verses from that part don't deserve the adjectives “mystical aspect" or “divine creation" etc. Because the “Nasadiya Sukta" later itself asks the reader
“Who created the world?”
“Is there a creator at all?”
It literally doubts the existence of God.
Well, let's move on.
You quoted the part where he says “Sat” means existent and “Asat” the opposite, and argued back that it's a liberal interpretation. According to you, Sat and Asat as per “Asatō Mā Sadagamayaṁ" (in the movie Matrix) probably mean honesty (or knowledge) and dishonesty. It made me real upset. After all, an irrelevant Hollywood movie caption cannot be an authentic translation of an Indian or Sanskrit phrase. What would it cost to Google it?
Sat literally means existence, reality, truth. And Asat the opposite. And yes, “Asatō mā sadagamayaṁ” means “Promote me from non-existence to existent reality”. And the Vedic verse as well, says that neither existence nor even non-existence prevailed before the world.
After that, you doubted about the description of no day and night being existent. You asked the reason, if it was meant to convey the information of no light and no darkness, why was it so oversimplified like “no day and no light". As much as I tried to go through the context, kids were sent to Gurukul at that time at the age of five to six. And this part of the Rigveda is one of the starting chapters. So, if a teacher or Guru wanted to make the students understand about the pre-BigBang ambience, he just couldn't say that there was no light and no darkness. Because that 5-6 years old kid was never going to get what it was like. He/she didn't even know what the properties of light are! So, as a simile, the phrase “no light no darkness" was used.
I think I am able to make clear what my arguments are. I also tried to be as civil as possible for me, and I would like people in the reply to behave the same.
Spot on! 👍👏
Don't try it bro. He's too egoistic and straight up a con man. Half his "refutations" can be refuted with a little bit of research and pre study and knowledge of Sanskrit. These are the same ppl who equate Vedic Texts with Harry Potter. He simply wants to be an internet meme. Let him be so
@@vishnusankeerth9436 I m a believer as well as a seeker. Few days back I used to feel like atheists r genuinely seekers who r ready to accept the truth. But from last 2-3 days I have noticed they r just like orthodox who don't want to be questioned (even humbly). Like there r 80-100 replies on the comment where this pranav is being praised but not even a single so called atheist replied this guy, and I feel this is the time for me to accept that actual atheists r really in small number in INDIA and a large chunk of them is just 'muhchor'.
@@SWAYAM_HAI_HAM Exactly my words bro. They will oppose each and every thing in religion till their last breath. They just don't want to look at the other side. I am agnostic but I feel that most people who proclaim themselves as rational atheists are actually not rational.
@@utkarshninawe97 I agree
Well, being out of the subject, I'm genuinely curious, what actually an agnostic is?
Thanks!
Thank you!
As someone who has read the vedas , people need to understand that they are and were never science books . They just contain hymns and lores of ancient elemental gods like Agni etc . And Some philosophical questions and ideas ....Nothing else . Vedic society was a primitive and somewhat tribal society . That hyperquest guy completely takes those hymn out of context .
Do some research on Indian grammarians you won't be able to say that Vedas have only philosophical ideas and no one tries to merge science and religion the very core of learning concepts of Sanskrit is to ask yourself how it's possible that's the only reason why still Astadhayi stands out even morden linguistic's around the world cannot match the work of panini
I generally don't reply to anyone on UA-cam but here I want you to reply me with good evidence that whatever I'm saying is not true😂
@@brijeshtripathi3607the thing is they are the subscribers of the cult named science , Filled with prejudices , believe random paper written by random person , but believing scripture is unscientific
@@brijeshtripathi3607hope u know there were better civilizations in this bhaarath before ithihasas & Vedic grammarians😂
Lol you are speaking like a professor and age old preacher of vedas, let me ask you just one question about vedas - who or which rishi proponded most brahmanas or shakha branches in recent time?
If you cant answer this then you can try for this:
What it means about a mention of rishi on every specific ved mantra, what contribution that rishi gave about the particular mantra?
I just love science and sometimes i doubt myself if i am wrong for disagreeing so much of the myth going around me or if i am wrong and the myth as it could be correct. But listening to you gives me so much reassurance and i just keep loving science more. Thank you.
I was waiting for this. My friend once showed his channel to me saying see how scinetific our hindu relgion is. I immediately told him science and philosophies are two different things. Science is evidence based and we also can apply it on our practical life for variuos things but not same for philosophies.
Hinduism doesn't discuss life but it does discuss the beginning of the universe and it is right
There is no liberal interpretation here, sat refers to reality the brahm and asat is non reality and brahm is only true existence
@@huklo6331nice one 😂
@@astro8833 uh? thanks dude anyways
Aaj hi le aate episode.😂
Chlo wait krte hain. 🍿
Man, what tf we need a video on weekly basis.
This was a much needed video
This guy from iit ? Might as well put the tax payers money in pothole
"Nah, that guy's smart, exploiting and pandering to sheep. Like, what do you think our general populace wants to see and hear? Things that challenge their views or thing's that reinforce them?"
He's actually a smart guy, he used to do book reviews, but once he made a video about some scripture, his video gained around 10x more views than average and for money and views he sacrificed his integrity.
Probably rss member from childhood
iit seems wasted.
This Hyperquest guy is a big pseudoscience fabricator.
@@mayb8876RSS does not teach you to spread BS. It is in fact a very big effort to unite Hindus removing casteism from people.
OP video as always keep going we'll never stop supporting you
Challenge : I am supporting Pranav until he gets famous.
I think I'll have to make my own videos bcuz it's very tough for Pranav to get viral.
🥺 thanks for the like Pranav bro
Thank you for this precious presentation❤❤
veda considered moon sun rahu ketu as a planet 😂😂😂😂
lol you need to learn the difference between grha and planet both aren't same.. sanatan reveals and vigyan darshan (streamed with an IITian) has already explained that difference.
Nah not a good argument. Grah or planet had different definations before, it comes from grahm means "one that meander" so whatever was meandering in sky too fast, was Planet for them.
With modern definations we have better defination. Just like just some decades ago Pluto was a planet too, defination was updated then it was not.
@@Sanatani_Atullthen tell your sanatani brothers to not say all 9 plants were discovered by india when it had only discovered sun, moon as planet (as they claim it as planet), and visible planets at that time (no light population)
@NiceUsername why bro? Mahabharata mentions all 8 planets
@@user-32-567 they don't. Not all plants are visible to human eyes. It also contains the sun & moon as planets.
I am so glad I found this. I continue to tell people that lot of credibility to Indian science and mathematics ia there historically. But claiming that we knew airplane mechanism, aerodynamics, quantum physics or calculus its like saying I know how to run a Michelin star restaurant just because my forefathers said they knew how to boil water and they wrote a vague letter hypothesising the boiled water idea. 😒
How this person got admission in IIT. I come from general category but i support reservation.
Because he was intellectual, pranav always tries to dumb down everyone
@@huklo6331 religion ko science banane me kahe ka dimag laga
@@vikashpal4875 he understands scriptures that you can't even comprehend
@@huklo6331 I don't need to comprehend them as these scriptures were meant to be treated as philosophical books, not science textbooks.
Reservation in present form is actually hypocrisy. Why do you think if somebody's parents have already got reservation and uplifted their economic status still needs reservation? Why does the opposition opposes the creamy layer concept in sc st reservation? That is opposition's minority appeasement. If you still support the 'present form' of reservation then either you are a hypocrite or an ignorant of social justice.
I'm so glad you made a video on this guy. He does need to be called out. While you made a video on only Rig Veda, I can assure you that he does the same thing in all of his videos. Also, he is a testament of the changing attitudes of the audience. He did make some rational topics in his earliest videos, but he soon turned to pandering to the majoritarian preferences. Unfortunately, I still continue watching his videos for guilty pleasure.
Its honestly frustrating when these religious unintellectual people make very vague claim that can't be disproved but also use the same vague claim to correlate with actual scientific discovery.
Religion has nothing to do with science; religion is the way to know oneself. Those who are claiming "my religion has something to do with modern science" are totally wrong. If science does not interfere with religion, religion should not interfere with science. (The religion that I'm talking about is totally different from what we call religion in today's sense.)
The process of knowing oneself is also part of science. Is psychology not science?
@@jaisharma2837 The science that I'm referring to is related to the physical world. Yes, I agree that knowing oneself is also a science but is not related to modern science. Psychology is a part of the social sciences not modern science.
I personally think there are many factors attached to Indian people believing in pages and videos trying to rationalise religion and spirituality from India without evidence. One I think is Colonial Inferiority which was created and carefully crafted by British and the education system they brought in which negated a lot of our evidence based and scientific discoveries as inferior. This was to an small extend even continued after Independence wherein our evidence based scientific and mathematic discoveries weren't given priority for example the lack of more study on the work of Aryabhatta or Kerala School of Mathematics. Second aspect is our cognitive biases which tends to discredit our scepticism of our religion perceived role in science. This is just my hypothesis and great work Pranav especially your main Channel Science is Dope and your revamped DD Rational
All they have to legitimise themselves is to show something that research is still going on, like quantum theory of gravity. I wonder why they can't do that, and only chose things that are already widely popular
Yeah that's what I am thinking, always big topics and and popular theory like multiverse, gravity, electricity, Atoms etc
Never heard them talking about things that are not popular like fardays law, nuclear fission and fusion ,
Periodic table etc 🤔 🤔🤔
Dear Pranav: A beacon of reason! A stalwart of science and logic! A master of both the cosmos and ancient tongues... and a total UA-cam comments section heartbreaker !!!
How could anyone neglect the profound insights offered by you dear Rationalist, Realist, Scientific, Non-Attention-Seeking, Respectful Representor, Astronomer and Sanskrit scholar.
You must have been too busy pondering the mysteries of the universe while simultaneously translating ancient Sanskrit texts and calculating the trajectory of celestial bodies to bother with such trivial matters and respond to a UA-cam video dedicated in your honour by Sanatan Reveals. ua-cam.com/video/mI3SrNx1CKE/v-deo.html
Why won't you grace Sanatan Reveals with your presence, oh Rationalist. Is it because you are too busy chilling in your logic lab, scoffing at the mystical like some kind of... Lion King Robocop. Come on, buddy or at least provide some entertainment for the peanut gallery.
Your foresight is truly unparalleled, making you the Robocop of internet community.
Last but not the least great creativity with the logo, Respect.
I have an opinion on why such videos get so many views. It is because most of the viewers of his (the hyper quest) channel haven't read the scriptures/texts from the primary sources, and are not very familiar with thd sanskrit language.
Sanskrit uses many alankars like rūpak, upmā, which means it is very easy to misinterpret the text to mean something entirely different to what intended.
I came to this conclusion after coming across Mr Nityānand Mṣra's channel.
Pranav is it legal to use DD Word in your Channel name ?
Isn't it Infringement?
Genuinely Concerned
Why is there DD in his name? I don't know the concept
@@日本語大好き DD stands For DoorDarshan.
All the Channels belonging to DoorDarshan Starts with Initials DD
Eg DD National DD News DD Bhakti etc
So I'm asking can he Use DD in his Channel's Name ? isn't it Violation?
Just like We Can't Use McD in Anything because It is Registered with McDonald's.
@@SamSpeaks09 You're correct. Thanks for the information.
Amazing video! Great content! I learn a lot from you. Along with debunking pseudoscience, I suggest you to create more videos about different scientific discoveries and how scientists arrived at conclusions in those discoveries. This will help your viewers understand how scientists logically analyze evidence & data and think rationally to arrive at those conclusions.
I do that on my other channel - science is dope
Chettande biggest fan anu sirrr
The quality has improved so much!
Great Work Pranav!
hope to have a more youtube channel like your and hyper quest which clear our concept
i was waiting for this...😅😅
great job! your videos are really great.
(you should get awarded for a good achievement ngl)
Love your work thank you for sharing your work 🎉❤
8:30
Actually the literal translation of sat will be "that which is" and for asat it will be "that which is not" so when we say "asatoma sat gamaya" we in a sense mean "lead me from falsity to reality" since this world is said to be not actually existing/illusionary.
The second verse "tamasoma jyotir gamaya" which means "lead me from darkness onto light" is often translated as "lead me from ignorance to the truth"
As for them being based on context many words in many languages are based on context, like the hindi word "laga" it can mean "put" or brooming or lighting the cooker etc based on the sentence/context, "run" can also be an example.
Context based words are part of language and don't really cause any problems.
Also Sat and asat don't have loose meanings its just they are non-transaltables.
HyperQuest is number one pseudoscience channel 😂
Please provide your reason if your statement is true😂
@@snehasingh4606In one of his most popular videos he says that hindu scriptures has concept of multiverse. Which in itself is false as they are connotations, nothing of value like orthogonality in phase space or probability density of wave function is mentioned in them.
But the cherry on cake is that he himself says that in every universe dharma is established, which is absolute violation of the totalitarian principle.
Their is your reasoning for why that statement is true.
For a 16 min video now creators need to give 3 min disclaimer just so the highly scientific people dont harass them. My India is great 😊
I was Travelling by a Train few months back and there were 3 NIT*ians with me and we started to converse on few topics ranging from science to Social issues. They themselves accepted that they were miles away understanding many things in those aspects. Studying in IIT, NIT doesn't guarantee you knowledge, Scientific Temper and critical view on Society. I am not saying i am wiser than them academically but yes in critical viewing of things it's different.
Connecting science with the scriptures of rishis who reached depth of life philoshically is genuinely making fun of them 😢
People nowadays have turned into English teachers, finding some meaning in a random "The" written by any famous author
Our society is high on the drug of religion and nationalism.
Asato ma sadgamaya
Tamasoma jyotirgamaya
Mrityorma amritam gamaya🌹🌹
This verse was also in a Malayalam movie called Chintamani kolacase
This stayed in my head all the time.
We know asato ma sadgamaya from this song named pulli vurumbuthu pulli vurumbuthu (vettaikaran)
There's is crow in Ramayana which hyper quest make a time traveller, on that day i hate that channel core from my heart
I don't think you really love his channel before fool 😂
@@MaharnaTech maybe
He can say anything, his muslim version guy can call flying carpet of aladin a spaceship 😂😂
Hyperquest is more scientific than science with dope❤❤
Yes i just check the translation of the nasadiya sukta from kramer's translation of the rv it says something like this
There was neither non-existence nor existence then;
Neither the realm of space, nor the sky which is beyond;
What stirred? Where? In whose protection?
There was neither death nor immortality then;
No distinguishing sign of night nor of day;
That One breathed, windless, by its own impulse;
Other than that there was nothing beyond.
So hyperquest was right in this regard
This is not a translation. This is an interpretation
I mean night and day is a concept for earth and planets going around a star. Here, the author seems to be just going on about some poetry.
I do not support hyper quest but every translation i can find on internet translate it as "non-existence" and "existence" like from vivekananda. So it might be correct for hyper quest to translate those words as such but that does not mean those hymn talks about big bang.
@@DDRational_ can you explain how is it an interpretation rather than translation?
I checked 3 translations of well known scholars 1) Kramer 2) Griffith 3) al balsham.
All of them has translated them as existence and non existence
"something like this"
Also vedas are filled with metaphors and other poetic devices you should not take it literally.
Thanks for calling this BS as is Pranav . Keep up the great work and pls don’t change .
If youth is following this then we are already screwed 💀☠️
The only UA-camr in India who is trying to make sense to all the dumb people. THANKS Pranav. Keep it up. You are doing a great job. Hats off to you. ❤
He is one of them who have ...has missonary money in his pocket ....😂😂😂😂😂
@@prasantapandaprasanta8824 thanks for watching his videos regularly
And calling others dumb is in you view a sign of intellectuality ?
Might have been pretty hard for you to talk about Sanatan Reveals.
Well, we do understand your pain. Since Our(atheist) buttocks has been stuffed pretty well by him.
Take care of yourself my brother in science. Wait..... but science doesn't have the boundaries to differentiate brothers and sisters from others. Let's goooooooooooo babe.
Anyone who uses an anime profile pic, their opinion is invalid
Dude don't hate anime just because some religious blind person used it. It doesn't have anything to do with anime. don't hate like anything btuh@@kartik6023
I don't hate religion until they try to enter in science
When religion needs to justify, appropriate and use science to solidify its stance,, it already means religion has lost,,,
I'm hundred percent sure you have not read any sutras. Take Surya siddhanta for example, they have poems in place of formulas that aid to calculate earth's rotation speed. It even gives a calculation to find earth's tilt (granted it's not the exact number as we know today, to have an accurate number thousands of years ago is an amazing achievement). सत् & सद् have different meaning when used in a sentence. How are you even comparing a Shanti mantra to a sutra? You ignore to dwell deep into the shloka because you don't understand it. Lastly, hyperquest didn't claim "scientists are discovering it now" crap, he simply says that this is seen in modern science as well. Vaisheshika sutra talks about atomic particles, obviously not as scientific as we know it today, but imagine someone actually having conversation on things like अणु ! It's clear you have a bias, do spend some time understanding what others are saying before you crap on them. Half of your video was your view and interpretation than showing the "truth"
I partially agree. But the credit shud not go to vedas. As vedas themselves mention civilisations that existed previously. (Dont come up with apaurusheya non sense as it has another meaning)
he isnt showing truths and stuff or claiming anything, he just targetted hyperquest and proved him wrong, he didnt even say anything about the religion
also सत् & सद् dont have different meaning when used in that case, because it's a rule of sandhi where a vyanjan changes to the third vyanjan of it's own varg when a third vyanjan comes after it, which is why when doing sandhi सत् changes to सद् (d is third in tavarg)
@@smellyfut4277 again don't try it bro.
This guy's simply a liar and a hypocrite
All he knows is to scream evidence repeatedly without properly examining them.
One should debate only when he's fully knowledgeable in both his and his opponents view, this guy's only knowledgeable in his own but doesn't think he should spent time studying other pov's before refuting them
And then he has the Audacity to call himself a "free thinker"😂😂😂
@@vishnusankeerth9436 he isn't debating, he's debunking the other guy's claims. He's only analyzing the fallacious interpretations and analogies made by the other guy, for which he isnt required to be knowledgeable, only logical
@@smellyfut4277 He isn't being logical :
Scientsists think a closed universe will behave in much the same way. Its expansion will slow down until it reaches a maximum size. Then it will recoil, collapsing back on itself. As it does, the universe will become denser and hotter until it ends in an infinitely hot, infinitely dense singularity. Or the Big Freeze scenario could happen, as the Universe keeps expanding on forever, and ever, and ever, and ever, until nothing but sub-atomic particles remain. So Science cannot prove what happened before or after this, cause they aren't this advancement.
It’s funny how humans think they know about the universe.
Who knows how the universe came to be. It could have always existed, an infinite plane of time, that never started, nor ever will end. It’s an idea people can’t even wrap their heads around.
The whole Big Bang thing was a mere theory, calculated based on the universe’s expanding rate.
We don’t even know if the Universe is infinite or finite, and there is no way to find a “starting point” on an infinite plane.
Hell, the real answer is probably something humans can’t even begin to imagine, let alone theorize and figure out with science.
And the funny thing is, no matter which theory you believe, all of it breaks current science anyway. If the Big Bang was real, then what was before it? Another universe? Nothing? Either way, there is no scientific explanation for why another universe would suddenly condense into the big bang, nor why matter would pop into existence.
In other words, its either a never ending cycle with no beginning/ending, or a beginning that started from pure nothingness. Science cannot explain either. So neither can they disprove the Cyclic Universe, nor can they prove it. Some scientists accept it and some don't.
He said how can words that are loosely translated give rise to anything scientific🤣. Welcome to sanatan dharma. He cannot accept that maybe we were right and he is wrong. This nasadiya suktam was translated literally thousands of years ago and passed down, when your science was still in its renaissance period🤣. He is trying to suggest that we copied science. Now who is older, the vedas or science? He says it is a liberal translation. He says why didn't we learn about the big bang from that verse🤣. Maybe cause you ignorant scientists were more foucsed on burning and trying to ruin the vedas and actually learn from them. If they actually tried to learn from them, the world would be quite different wouldn't it. Those who have studied the vedas, have actually verified how scientific it is. Just because it provides the answer without your scientific workings doesn't mean it is wrong. It is not a maths book where you must show working to score a mark. it is a religious book, which causally mentions some parts of science whilst trying to teach us about the glory of God. So he has completetely misunderstood religion.
Next he starts waffling about the vedas was written by humans. He doesn't understand sanskrit. The verse is talking about God, and saying how he has always existed, and how before God created immortality and death, he was there. This verse is saying how before life and death, God was there. So where is he including science? This talks about God, not science.
He doesnt look at the rest cause he knows it it true. He doesnt try and make it fit the big bang. He is explaining the commentary of rishis from thousands of years before. So if anything, the big bang is trying to fit this. We don't care about the big bang. We reject the big bang, so wtf is he saying about we are trying to fit the big bang. All religious people reject the big bang, we believe god made the universe, not two particles.
Their modern science is based on observation. However what is in this sukta is not science. We don't care about science. This is religion. We don't need your equations and working out to prove something. Just because someone wrote something about the universe and people agree with it, doesn't mean it is science. THEY ALL COME FROM PRAYERS YOU FUKING IDIOTS, THEY ARE MEANT TO PRAISE GOD, NOT YOUR FUKING SCIENCE. All science eventually leads to the existence of God, so go home and live your life peacefully without tryna stress whether something correct is written in the vedas.
This guy said scripture was learned from evidence, then written down. I don't think he even understands religion. You don't even need to Hindu to realise that this guy is chatting so much BS.
He is boasting about what Science has done, with predictions. Well what do you think Sanatan Dharma has done? It is not a prediction because Hinduism believed this before science existed, thousands of years back in the vedic period.
This bruddah talks about predictions. It is not a make a wish book. It is a scripture. Read the Surya Sidhanta, or other ones. It is not that because there is no working, the answer is discredited.
So overall you are just an Ignorant being who is not aware of sanatan dharma. Nice
the countdown looks great
It's a youtube feature!
LOL
Pranav I would suggested u , make a whole length video on bang bang theory and how this universe came to an existence ....there's a hell lot of misconceptions buzzing on it
🤔
Bro didn't pass 8th 💀
Now we have Annamalai of wisdom really we are lucky to have you on UA-cam thankyou
He is not wrong when he translates सत् as existence. सत् is the present participle of the verbal root अस्, which means "to exist". Thus, existing or existence. But often in Sanskrit and in every language around the world, semantics of a word can shift based upon context, in which case, सत् can also be translated as wisdom.
But OF COURSE, that in no way validates Vedas being concurrent to modern science. 🤦♂️
The meaning of Sat and Asat hasn't changed in both the sholkas. The meaning of Sat and Asat is Real and unreal respectively so "Asatoma sadgamaya" means lead me from the Unreal to the real. And in Nasadiya suktam the meaning is also Real and unreal as Real means that which exists and unreal means that which doesn't. So the verse says there was no reality nor non reality. Pls consider replying
D.D. Rational. Love the rebranding, mate !
I am religional yet I fully support science and its progress in recent times we have come long way
With enough self growth you'll find yourself not needing purpose in life and end up seeing religion as myth.
But hyperquest is more rationalist and intelligent on philosophy
Philosophy cant make internal combustion engines or semiconductor based chips my guy 💀
@@A_n.t_i.s_o.c_i.a_l engineering is not concerned with studying about diseases either. You can't make a steam engine with the knowledge of biology. Chemistry won't help you find the mass of sun.
Philosophy thus, is not concerned about steam engines. Don't expect something to work in every field.
Also, these pseudoscientific creators will never give a rational explanation as to how the ancient people came up with conclusions by modern science. It is because the ancient people never had the technology to arrive at those conclusions. The truth is that without modern technology humans would have never arrived to those conclusions by modern science.
What happened to the old channel Science is dope?
Bruh you are damn good at expressing and explaining...
Love to see a dedicated channel from you in which you are teaching math and science
Most of the atheists miss out on heavy Contexts and leave the burden of proof on religion. The nasdiya sukt he mentioned was such a gem of sukt in Rigveda, which shows how humble a scripture can be in saying that we don't know the ultimate reality, we can guess and the biggest problem with atheists is trying countering religion solely on the basis of science which is actually not possible, bcs science and religion are different things, there r many things in religion which science doesn't deal with, like emotions stuff, morality, spirituality, Philosophy, etc then there are Yogic sciences, ppl would easily call it pseudoscience but that's the worst they can, pseudoscience is the most misused word today used to counter any spiritual teaching which has some element of science. Science is amazing definetly but doesn't hold the sole authority otherwise there won't have been any other subject. If you think or any atheist thinks religions don't have science that's true but that's not in the case of Hinduism. One has to give up their biases to understand what hinduism is. I have debated with sooo many ppl soo many atheists and i feel pity about their knowledge, most of the ppl who hop on the name of science are those who know it the least also same with the religious ppl, those who hop on the name of religion are mostly those who don't know religion. Tho your video is good but it has a lot of mistakes and falls out of context and place like the translation part that how do we know the right meaning, than u tried comparing with Quran, that's manipulation. Won't talk much about Big Crunch but i'd suggest learn about Vedant and if u r gutsy go expose it.
Yeah if some one believes so much in science then science doesn't have any cure for autoimmune diseases. They don't even know why exactly these diseases happen. Science doesn't believe in a person's emotions. Does that mean a person does not have any emotions? Even most of the calculations in science are based on assumptions.
😂😂😂thousands of religion are exist 😂
Mythology
Spiderman is also Mythology same as your god
@@humanbeing1551 that's y i worry about atheists, they come up with these logics. They don't know what god is, thry don't have idea about philosophy, they just straightaway reject things with flawed logic. L rationality
@@Zuddso psycology is a branch of science which deals with emotions and human behaviour
how much dumb can you be
@@njr7678 well what idea do we not have about philosophy ?
Hey pranav make a playlist of aall those videos on Indian geniuses , or mention that in description if it already exists. Itll be easy for us to watch them all
Keep doing bro..
We give awards..your followers are your awards🎉🎉🎉🎉
Since your followers are mature and are not blind. 💝
Didn't know until today that he was from nit Calicut, my college 😅
He long jumped in such a speed to hyperquest that he missed the actual quest 😂
Thanks UA-cam for suggesting me this channel
Love ur work
Thanks for giving unpaid advertisement to the channel.
SatChitAnandam Sat Existence Chit aware Ananda Endless (bliss)
Absolutely wrong my dear.
"Om tat sad iti nirdesho Brahmanas trividhah smrtah" bg 17.23
Om - the transcendental vibration
Tat - that is
Sat - eternal/ ultimate truth.
These three are the names attributed to brahman.
"Asato ma sadgamaya"
Asat - which is not true (ignorance)
Sat - true
Lead me from ignorance to truth.
Bro again you didn't completely translate the Nasadiya Sukta. I think you need to learn vyakaran of the Sanskrit which is complicated and organised before debunking. I can post you the genuine link of translated Nasadiya Sukta. Regarding the same word with different meanings, these homographs exist in English Language too Eg: Space, Sow. Half knowledge is dangerous
Abe a chomu ha. Isne kabhi koi kitab apri hi nahi ha, bas yt ma lamba lamba fekta ha aur uske leftist andbhakto khus karta ha
"maybe the great sages don't know maybe god themselves don't know where everything began" that's what it means right?
Love from Odisha. ❤
Can you please make the video more elaborate, I get your point but you are finishing the things in a very shallow manner the topic on which Hyperquest has made the video is way different and in his video he is trying to make logical arguments about a philosophy instead of scientific argument. If you can understand the philosophy discussed in the video and present the counter arguments, that will be appreciated.
Thanks at least somebody tried to debunk him. He speaks whatever pseudoscience he wants and his followers (so called sanatani scientists) appreciate him daily for recovering their old-age heritage of science. Nobody to check whether they r right or wrong and also, they don't want to be. They're have debate in my house and at the end they quoted him with his video (which had no meaning but they're adamant that if he's providing from Hinduism only). Now I'm gonna quote your and Neil de grease Tyson's video as my reference 😁
You really proselytised me.
He is selling just proud like our prime minister 😂
Every religion deserves a tiny space for irrational beliefs. This helps people connect to something greater than themselves. If religions weren't irrational Jesus wouldn't have been able to walk on water, Quran wouldn't be the literal word of God and Krishna wouldn't have lifted the govardhan. Your videos seem very pointed only towards Hinduism because it is the easiest to criticize with little to no resistance or repercussions to what you say even though whatever you say might be scientifically sound. Also seems to fit the narrative of you being against political Hinduism which is taking India by storm (and rightfully so).
You can check one of his videos on his another channel where he has given proper explanation why his videos are mostly around hinduism.
@@atinmittal5029 shut up Pranav is a Hinduphobic and he disrespect the emotion of dharmic people
His videos are NOT about "Hinduism".. His videos are concentrated on India where Hindu superstitions prevail. If the video made by hyper quest would have been about Islam, I don't think he would step back from criticizing it..
@@SteveBreaksASMRthen why is your religion always trying to cope hard with science? Can't see your own problems and doing whataboutary?
@@PobitroMon I highly doubt that but ok
Bro, asat and sat has not the meaning what you know... English transliteration never told you the real meaning of Sanskrit words.
let me know what sat and asat means
@@namandixit950 asat means experience through senses and divisions of mind, and sat means neither experience through senses nor divisions of mind.
You should exclude APJ Abdul Kalam if you are talking about scientists,yes if you are talking about engineers you can include him .
Half boiled 😂
He is an aerospace scientist.
@@explorelonelyplanet3696 Could you please tell me exactly what was his thesis paper during PhD ? I seriously don't know.
Yea you are right... He got honorary PhD... Not a real one...@@Avishek.Actuary
Please more Pseudoscience Police episodes 🙏
lines from intro 😢😢
Keep up the good work
Now it's time to eat the dinner served by HyperQuest and I think Pranav is ready to eat it eagerly!!
these people are amazing at seeing patterns they can relate any poem to a cosmic phenomenon in a second ...