1) Yes, complex numbers have no evidence of existence in real world. That's why we call it imaginary. But religion says god exists when they have no evidence. Atleast math doesn't tell lies to mankind. 2) We still use imaginary numbers because it has many real life applications. But god has none.
@@anchitbose4151and there can be application of god to justify objective morality which is useful in lots of ways so saying it serves no purpose is too far. (Not saying that it does more harm or more good but it can have practical application)
That's the point take god not as an empirical claim but a metaphysical claim i.e used to address several philosophical problems. Also there are arguments of avicena which also supports the claim of a non-dual existence (if you're interested)
Viomh essentially contradicted his own facts and definitions. Also, Vimoh didn’t even reach out to him; in fact, he challenged Vimoh to a debate. Now, vimoh is lamenting rational thought and logical reasoning by posting Alex’s videos.😂😂😂
Bhai bring Mohit Gaud ( Vigyan Darshan ) on your podcast. He recently debunked Oxford University through his research paper and his research paper successfully peer reviewed 😊 His first podcast done on ABP Dharma live few days ago. He is just 23 year old but very knowledgeable. And best part is that he is against atheist and fake rationals😁
Idhar genuine unbiased Hindu Vaidik dharm ka gyan liya jata hai jo asal mein Vaidik Hindu dharm ka itihas hota tha. Sanghiyo ka overexaggerated nhi ki duniya ka har ek chiz Hinduism/Brahminism/Vedism se shuru hua hai, humare purvajo ke paas sab kuch tha etc. 😁
@@manaspratimdas707 Out of context baat na le ja. Jo bhi tumne bola wo sab ka mere iss comment se kya lena dena ? Lagta hai naye naye atheist bane ho iss liye garmi jade hai😁
This guy was bullying me two days ago 😂 Called 8 times on Instagram... Used foul language and all. What I did ? I commented on his reel. Asked him for a debate on a public platform, said no many times not to do it in Instagram DM. He insisted a lot so I just asked one question on his fear mongering reel of Muslim population growth and he had no answers, he was just pushing again and again this one pew research article. He clearly understood my point on fear mongering but had no answers. I pity people like him, after talking so much religion they don't have basic decency to talk and debate. And they ask where do atheists get their morality from
As expected in comment section nobody is interested in probing and dissecting the epistemological and metaphysical arguments and discussion being purported in the video, sab bas tu - tu mai mai kar rahe hai, its mostly because ye video dekhne ke baad they are probably going to watch some vacuous and reductionist political commentary which does nothing but instill a sense of antagonism in them and wisdom is antithetical to vehemence, anyways my personal takeaway is that from a materialist position you could have probed him about Daniel dennet and his views on consciousness, nature and problem of evil and the concept of hard empiricism since he subscribes to an analytical idealistic point of view. i think he is the most erudite guest on the show so far, i would personally wish that you invite people like nihilanand etc to know a bit more about antinatalism. All the best
@yoyo17356 this guy is worse.. Look for my comment in the comment section... What he did .This channel is restricting all my comment... Can't see my comment in this thread as well. And they talk philosophy and all
They are internet atheists. They want to project themselves as superior rational and free thinkers despite the fact that they cannot argue philosophically.
12:00 people dont have any problem Its just they oppose many festivals which contain many society problems U cannot support so called cultral hindu muslim christian marrige sabe me patriarchy hai its just an example of things So its a symbolic cristism against culture People who criticise also might celebrate some same cultural events which they find less harmfull
Mujhe na Theist banna hai aur na Atheist. Mai apni life full freedom aur happiness ke saath jeena chahta hu. Bina iss baat ki chinta kiye ki God hai ya nahi. Bina iss baat ko saabit kiye ki God hai ya nahi hai. 😊
23:26 i would like to correct that there exist mathematical proof for second law of thermodynamics through carnot cycle. (This proof essentially begins with proving that there exist no thermodynamic cyclic process that is more efficient than a carnot cycle for same state And from here we establish the clausius inequality thus defining entropy) Not to mention in statistical mechanics there also exist proof of it historically it was empirical tho later mathematical formulation was derived.
चलो भाई अब physics पढ़ना छोड़ दो,philosophy पढ़ो ,भार्गव philosophy को ज्यादा महत्व का बता दिया हे इससे ही दुनिया चलेगी अब, हमें केवल logic लड़ाना हे evidence की कोई जरूरत नहीं ,logic से ही proof हो जायेगा अब सब
@@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536 meri nahi sabki,physics se hi chal Rahi gravitation law,electromagnetism,quantom etc इन सबके evidence है अगर इनमें कोई theory हे तो testified हुए बिना वो accepted नही मतलब logical बोल बच्चन accept नही
Yes vedas me ethics hai. Kabhi vedas ko padha bhi hai ? Ashtadhyay, Nirukt, Alankar, Vyakaran ki knowledge ke bina vedas pe muh utha ko hagne aa jate ho 🤡 Abhi vedas ke ek mantra ka padartha ka ashtadhyay se bashya puch lunga tho fatt ke 4 ho jayegi. You seems like, you don't basics of multiply, addition, division and wanna talk about Integration. Go learn vedic vyakaran than talk about vedas. Glory to vedas 🗿
अवर्त्या शुन आन्त्राणि पेचे न देवेषु विविदे मर्डितारम् । अपश्यं जायाममहीयमानामधा मे श्येनो मध्वा जभार ॥ 13 ॥ भूख से पीड़ित होकर हमने अभक्षणीय श्वान की अंतड़ियों को भी पकाया, तब हमारे निमित्त देवताओं में इन्द्र के अतिरिक्त कोई अन्य सुख देने वाला नहीं हुआ। जब हमने अपनी पत्नी को अपमानित होते हुए देखा, तब इन्द्र ने ही हमें संरक्षित करते हुए मधुर रस प्रदान किया।
Triangle is abstract entity of maths. But we can observe things that are approximately equivalent to triangle in nature. So, not 100% equivalent but for practical purposes yes its fine. As, nothing is 100%, as whole world could be in matrix. But we believe what evidence our senses tells us and verify with other people. Similarly, if abstract concept and laws of triangle allow methods for real world calculation of trigonometry whith quite accuracy. But god is not the same. God doesn't come with a methodology, nor can you prove existence of god in real world with evidence. If people claim that god is just experience in senses then, but not in real world. Then god is very pleasurable hallucinatory experience. At this point why call it god (as it is misleading) just call it a psychological/hallucinatory experience. In conclusion - Existence of god claim is misleading Experience of very pleasurable hallucinatory experience isn't misleading. So, more honest seeker would call it an psychological state not "god being real" claim.
@@anchitbose4151 hm we can not presuppose what we are trying to prove. If you are going to say "we presuppose laws of logic also". That's because we can verify them when we apply it in real world. We studied real-world found common patterns refined them into laws of logic. (Descriptive laws). What real world observations leads to idea of god? Also, the only commonality between god and maths is both concepts are abstract. But subtle difference is utility. Maths has utilised in understanding and predicting behaviour of phenomena. But god doesn't. The only utility idea of god was to bind people in stories and make tribe more close and strong to drive cooperation, binding in a certain motility that god/religion preaches. I.e. social cohesion. But as time passed we also became aware of bad sides religion/god. i.e. appeals to authority. A single person could easily gain power. Thats why we came up with better imaginary constructs to organise society i.e. democracy. Thus god even as an imaginary construct doesnt have value in my opinion. For some people it might provide emotional value. But so can therepy, meditation etc that are not based on supernatural claims.
Hindu atheist hi kyu bolna hai ? Indian Culture hai toh "Indian atheist(Bhartiya Atheist)" ya fir "Indian Agnostic(Bhartiya Agnostic)" bolo na bhai... Simple hai... Baki fir agar nahi toh Yeh toh wahi baat ho gayi tunniyo wali...
Bro this bhargava is such a lame guy he abused vimoh and strawmanned his atheist definition to show himself superior or more intellectual 😂 ,watch his that video from somewhere
About the evidence, science, phil. of Science (basic level) you can take "Philosophy of Humanities" mini lecture series, from Leiden University. Whoever reading the comments✌️
This @ProjectSatyaloka is such a lame guy , he straw-manned Vimoh's atheist definition and abused him , such a loser , i wont even watch this podcast, but i have watched all yr podcasts and liked most of them
Lol! He has logically criticized Vimoh on his Instagram reels. Secondly, since when you guys have a problem with so called abuses? Isn't vimoh abused many theists and religious practices in his videos? Khudh pe aata hai tho problem kyu hai?
Bhai vimoh aur bhargava ki debate krba do mja ayga aap inn dono k friend hoto pls unko bolna kafi kuch saaf ho jyga... Bhargava debunk kr raha h vimoh ko but this is one way conversation counter m vimoh ne kuch nhi bola but dono sath m debate krenge to bht kuch samne ayga.... Bhargava khta h ki wo phd student h aur usne religion god atheism ka gyan h to vimoh se unki debate krvao taki pata chale ki really m h bhi ya nhi... Kyunki hum sab khud to ye sab book pd nhi skte kaam chhod so agar aap kr ske to krna ols
@yoyo17356 j Sai भी lawer है,california में पढ रहा,तो क्या कुछ भी बोलेगा और हम मान ले,ये बंदा का insta देखा मेने खुद bhraman हे और parshuram को ताकतवर बताकर anime बनाया हे,वो परशुराम जिसने सभी क्षतियो को मार दिया ये फर्जी कहानी जिसमे bhramano को society में क्षत्रिय बना दिया मतलब सबसे ऊंचा जिसने क्षत्रीय को भी मर दिया,और उनकी विधवा से विवाह कर लिया,उस परशुराम जिसने अपनी मां को मार दिया ये भी उसको philosoohy से defende करता हे ऐसे अनेतिक superiority से भरे काम को,और हम भोले लोग इसके फर्जी philosophy को सुनकर जिसका ना science को कुछ काम ना ही practical Life में, प्रभावित होकर इसकी हर बात मन लेते है,इसने जो भी बोला उसे कोई भी समझ सकता हे मगर जो बोला उसका काम कुछ भी नही,सिर्फ मौज हे एसी दिमागी मौज का क्या करे भाई,ये खुद indian religion superiority से biased है,
@@trueRationalThinker bhargav keval recorded video banata he,vimih live आता हे जिसमे दूसरा साइड उसके साथ debate कर सकता हे ,तो कोन दो साइड और कोन एक side हे इसका सबुत तो मेने दे दिया,अब इतना ही तुम भार्गव का दो साइड होने का मजबूत सबूत दो ,record video का मत कहना वो vimoh भी बनाता है,live की बात ही अलग हे,live के record में bakvas galti पकड़कर खुद को hero बनाना आसान हे,live में आना कठिन
@yoyo17356 तुम्हारी analogy सही नही हे,जब किसी मुद्दे पर अलग विचार रखने वाले debate करेंगे तो लोग decide करेंगे क्या सच क्या गलत,भार्गव ने पहले point उठाया था तो उसको विमोह के पास जाकर प्वाइंट रखना था record करने से चीज़े clear नही होती ,इसलिए vimoh ज्यादा हिम्मत वाला काम कर रहा हे मेने ये नही कहा की विमोह सही हों जायेगा मगर विमोह ने चीज खुली रखी हे और भार्गव केवल record video बनाता हे, वो भी पूरे context को हटाकर ,जो की रिकार्ड video में होता ही हे,व्यक्ति चालबाजी कर जाता हे,debate ,वो भी live में चालबाजी काम नहीं आती,तुम्हारे analogy में तुमने अब्दुल कलाम को लिया जो मिसाइल बनाना जानते थे मगर यहां ये confirmation नही हे की भार्गव जानता हे या वो जो बोल रहा वो सच हे
Bhai vimoh ne ek video jsai Deepak pr banaya hai aur uska reply ek kolkata college street channel Bengali creator hai usne Diya hai uska video bhi dekho Maine saare dekh liye usne vimoh ko 10 12 std commie bola hai mai neutral hoon dono dekhe vimoh ka j sai ke upar plus reply by Bengali creator channel name kolkata college street
He is wonderfully manipulating the words there is no god and creator of universe that is Atheism ⚛️⚛️ If you want to represent yourself culturally we can say we are INDIANS 🇮🇳🇮🇳
That's an interesting comparison. However, there's a key distinction between the acceptance of complex numbers in mathematics and belief in a deity. Complex numbers, though abstract, are defined within the framework of mathematics with clear rules and applications that can produce meaningful results. They solve equations like , and are used extensively in fields such as engineering, physics, and computer science, where they provide practical and consistent utility. The concept of God, on the other hand, tends to involve metaphysical claims about the nature of reality that go beyond empirical observation and experimentation. While complex numbers are a tool invented to solve certain problems within mathematics, the existence of God is a matter that goes beyond a self-contained system of definitions and rules and is instead a claim about the fundamental nature of reality.
2_2=4. There are two possible answers , either addition or multiplication. From Young's double slit experiment we know that electrons have wave like nature. Dual nature. Later on de broglie says every matter is associated with a wave. Since lambda is small due to higher mass, we see a particle as particle not a wave.
Culture is not the only constituent of any religion....but religion constitute culture into itself.....the way we celebrate festivals..... it's not written into any hindu text....diwali is not about diya and crackers and even ganesh and laxmi worship....holi is never about colours in any book..... There is no boundary of Hinduism or sanatan.....it has taken things from other places and which has no written text or anything..... When you call yourself hindu atheist or hindu agonist.....hindu must just be a identity but nothing else.....we can't refer to any text for the culture we practice.....and just practicing some culture cannot make you religious And chal baat kar bhai India's history isn't that glorious for women.....even the religious texts prove it..... calling female name in worshipping and doing nothing for women is habit of hindu culture...... although indian culture has helped and questioned it all..... that's where Indian culture has been better....and just there....not on root level..... Aur welcoming everyone is a good thing but making a big group of people secondary citizen..... it's also in our own culture..... Indian culture is not that praise worthy...... And still welcoming behaviour is under scrutiny.....so many jokes about Russian women....a man literally recorded the video while rating women And we Indians are racist on another level.....not for foreigners only but for people coming from other parts of country You had a good experience with a somewhat priest can be relatable for everyone because we hadn't been stuck onto religious texts so much (and that's only the good thing in Indian culture).....if we had been stuck onto it..... atheistic values and people would have been looked down upon.....no good thing is written in books for atheists....
Saying hindu is religion is implying that it's a single religion when it's not. Try reading about development of so called "hinduism" and it's further developments on how it shifted from preaching gods such as Indra and Agni to preaching gods such as Shiva and Vishnu which were most likely the gods aside from brahmanism. Aside from that the various schools such as sankhya and even yoga (to some extent) or nyaya are atheistic in nature. So tagging Hinduism and claiming it doesn't make sense because first of all you can't classify or generalise Hinduism as a whole you have to talk about the school and even in school there are different subschools / traditions which differ in their philosophy. The Upanishads don't even focus on the entity of "god" but more of a metaphysical entity which is the fabric of consciousness and material. Read more before claiming anything.
@@tanishqpandey7021 it doesn't even matter bro it's all how itd done If u go tu ur mother and say hindu is not religion she would get mad at u So what many follow that way becomes what it is in a society If u wanna know people philosophically following their number would be the smallest minority in India lol And if normal people read vedanta they would say it's shit coz it has no bhakti element (fr I have heard it) And for most hindusim is just raping some sanskrit without knowing f about it's meaning And going to mandir crying for their wish and celebrating festivals And character gods It's just the biggest piece of bull shit even this guy told it indirectly At first years ago indira was the biggest God lol having a God for rain thunder education money is in everywhere we can find 70 percent similarity in Greek gods It's just simple God of gaps Then came ramayan which is just folk tale said in many parts of South Asia there are literally thousands of ramayana there are even ramayan where there is no ravan there are ramayan where lakshman is hero there are ramayan where sita is hero there are ramayan where sita is sister of ram And there is no proof this braminical valmiki ramayan is first of them There are even muslim ramayan which is really old and celebrated by some muslim majority countries in Asia And if u go to Kerala there is mapila ramayan (mapila means slang word of calling muslim) In which they sing Ramayana through mapila paat which is folk song genre of that region Mahabharat is just some pure fiction and gita had only 91 verse in oldest book but it went on to improve its numbers with time btw at start it was only krishna asking arjun if u are man go to war and justifying murder is not problem Arjun had better morals lol he refused every time And ganapathi narasimham were just tribal gods or forest gods which got added to religion for their character survival It's just basic instinct of tribal people to worship the thing they see as powerfull So if a lion is causing problems in their village they would make lionxhuman statue and pray to them as it's only ray of hope So in that way ganesh also came In Africa u can still see lion headed man worshiped by tribes
@@anonymouspersonbehind5354 people advocate the religion part and that I agree. But hinduism is not advocated by people tbh. In the end it's the mathas and the traditions which truly advocate hinduism. Now one can say that the majority should represent what "hinduism" is and I too kind of agree to some extent but my position is actually no. Reason is that in the end the one who hold authority over the scriptures are the traditions which still hold their position. A common man's ideas (who doesn't follow the scriptures ofcourse) about their religion is not above a guru or a follower of the scriptures . Also in religious academics the scholars only consider the words of head of a traditional sect or a reputated teacher of the sect. General opinion of public is not very religious or philosophical but rather it's more politically influenced.
@@anonymouspersonbehind5354 leaving aside that topic I guess that it's not correct to say that it was originally just tribal folks because that cannot be dated either and many dieties are added much later which is probably due to some tribal religions being developed much later than formation of Vedic-hinduism. Also considering ramayana a fable or not is not of much use tbh. But the literary consistency of both Valmiki Ramayana as well as mahabharat indicates that these were written not at different periods but at same (not meaning that ramayana and mahabharat were written at same period of time but mahabharat as a whole was written at one time as a whole and ramayana was written at other time as a whole). Tbh I don't know where you got that 92 verse thing I've heard it for first time and I've never seen any academic mention of it nor in any of tradition I've heard it. Tho I've heard some verses were added to match the philosophy of some specific sect but 92 and 700 is a huge gap and bhagwad Geeta is a prasthan-traya granth primarily so the deviation you're talking about doesn't make sense
Bhagwan naam bhi to insaan ne diya hai, jo hai, uska naam wo hi janta hoga, BrahmSutra me kaha hai `` Rasho ve shh " Shh mean `` woh = that ". To wo hai ya nahi ye koi prouf koi de nahi sakta, usko jo bhi naam tum doge wo `` Tatti " Ho jayega, Or jise log creater kehte hain, uski `` MKB "
Chal bat kar किसने बोला culture से अलग होने को ,क्यों झूठ बोल रहे,मेने भी कई atheist को सुना दिवाली holi को मानने celebrate करने को उन्होंने माना नही बोला ,छोटी बच्ची हो क्या,कोई एक ने तुम्हे प्रभावित किया इसलिए दूसरे को बस गलत बता दो अलग होने के लिए भली उसने वो बोला नहीं
Ranveer toh poora RW ban gaya hai. He is one sided now and mostly uske guests bhi one sided narrative wale hai. Aaj agar koi thoda bohut center me khel raha hai toh woh hai I guess Dostcast wala banda.
But aap ke science journey ko tho maine hi live debate me ghuss ke dhoya tha🙄 Even Vigyan Darshan ne tho usko utha utha ke dhoya tha. And vo SJ itna azib banda hai ki jab usko koi counter karta hai tho baar baar mute kar deta hai😑 Ek kaam karo usko Science Journey nahi Mute Journey kaha karo.
Science journey is only good for rationalising people from poverty prone areas where there is abundance of superstition. Urban people wont buy anything he says.
Hindu Atheist, Muslim atheist, christian atheist bhai ye sab doglapana haine and calling an atheist a hindu is like calling an ex Muslim a Muslim ager maine kahta hu maine atheist Muslim hun maine namaz partu hun roza rakhti mashjid jati hun Allah hu alla hu karti isn't it sounds confusing?kya esi nastikta kaha jay ga?. And culture is not only about religion culture isse bhi zada bada haine religion ko inkar kadne se culture kho jay ga nahi. Our hindu findu bolkar kuch nahi hota ye nam to Persians o ne diye thi. Bharat ki mitti ki khudai karne ke bad buddha ka hi murti milta haine ram, krishna, shiv inke murti kyun nahi milti? Our samrat ashok ke hi lipi milti haine.Besically india was Buddhist country so Hinduism manne se ya na manne se culture khatmo nahi hi jayga
Bro just a advice please next time do add subtitles or speak in English, it’s hard for the rest of India to understand when many non hindi Indians want to be closer to the dharmic philosophy.
@@Assault_Rifle-777 How can you be 100% sure that god is the first cause? Did you conduct any tests to conclude it? Just because we can't know what is before the big bang that doesn't mean, it's the work of God. It's just an assumption, not a proof.
Bringing anybody into podcast, next time just go and ask your neighbor , your haircutter, random salesman, swiggy delivery for the podcast.. Atleast there will be less chance to be pretentious and fake like this one
Yeh jo purana,bramha,Shiva, shakti inke ware me bol rha wo western, Marxist view point se bol rha hai... Jo pahle se maan liye the alag alag religion ka jambvda hai Sanatan dharm. Jabki asa nhi hai. Purana ki baat ved, bramhan granth,upnishad me hai. Bramhan granth bhi ved me count hote hai. Chanakya ke time 18 purana the.. Aab isko yeh log later addition kahe kar chalate hai... Alag alag devta ki baat kar rahe wo Western mindset hai. Ved me jo devta hai wo bramh hi hai jo ase bivin naam roop me apper karte hai... Yeh thik wase hai ek Muslim Christian Sanatan dharm ki explanation de raha ho. Jaise western logo ne arya ek insan ke quality ko nasal se jodh diya. Yeh sab thod dalo raaz karo ka niti hai.. Kaal log ko provoke karenge arey tumhara sanatn dharm alag alag religion ka hai.. tum swatantra ho. Sanatan dharm me ek na ho.. tum ek nhi the kabhi. Ved, upnishad shruti sastra hai aab kisi ek samay lipi vadh kiya iska matalb yeh nhi ki wo pahle nhi the. Shurti the baad me kisine likha. Aur purana cosmic, devi devta ki story hai. Uska compilation kiya ved vyas ji ne.. mahabharata yudh khatam hone ke baad.. Jisko aap laye ho wo sastra ko upper upper se hi samjhe hai. Adhatma hinta dikh rha unme bas. Isliye Shiva, vaisnav, shakt ko folklore tradition bata rahe kyun inhone pahle se hi maan Liya ase hi hai.. "Ken upnishad" me devi shakti ka varnan hai aab isko bhi kahenge addition. Aab yehi hua subject kisi aur ka lekin manyata tay karenge western aur Marxist log...
1) Yes, complex numbers have no evidence of existence in real world. That's why we call it imaginary. But religion says god exists when they have no evidence. Atleast math doesn't tell lies to mankind.
2) We still use imaginary numbers because it has many real life applications. But god has none.
There are many abstract mathematical ideas that have no application but still exists
e.g.
@@anchitbose4151
@@anchitbose4151and there can be application of god to justify objective morality which is useful in lots of ways so saying it serves no purpose is too far. (Not saying that it does more harm or more good but it can have practical application)
That's the point take god not as an empirical claim but a metaphysical claim i.e used to address several philosophical problems. Also there are arguments of avicena which also supports the claim of a non-dual existence (if you're interested)
@@anchitbose4151unko sahi paro sabko imaginary bola jata hein god ke time pe kiun nahi😂
Peak Upper Caste Priviledge = Bhargava
He doesn't believe in caste system.
@@Assault_Rifle-777 you can claim to not believe in water and still drink it to quench your thirst
@@shiroyasha_007
If yo;u c;an't be;at Bhar;gav in 'formal lo;gic' th;en b;ring c;asteism as retor;t.👌
Prove it
@@shiroyasha_007woow what a logic ....
CHK I think Vimoh called you after this podcast. vimoh is like : party badal li
बंदा कन्फ्यूज हो गया philosophy की कहानी सुनकर ,भार्गव जैसे लोग यही करते हे घुमाना ऐसे लोगो बच्चो को
Viomh essentially contradicted his own facts and definitions. Also, Vimoh didn’t even reach out to him; in fact, he challenged Vimoh to a debate. Now, vimoh is lamenting rational thought and logical reasoning by posting Alex’s videos.😂😂😂
Kuch milega to bolege vimoh- ei to coincidence hey
Or kuch nahi
Vimoh better than arpit
Duno ka video dekha
Arpit to 50% true bol kar chor dega
A;theism is j;oke in In;dia.
Bhai bring Mohit Gaud ( Vigyan Darshan ) on your podcast. He recently debunked Oxford University through his research paper and his research paper successfully peer reviewed 😊
His first podcast done on ABP Dharma live few days ago.
He is just 23 year old but very knowledgeable. And best part is that he is against atheist and fake rationals😁
Idhar genuine unbiased Hindu Vaidik dharm ka gyan liya jata hai jo asal mein Vaidik Hindu dharm ka itihas hota tha. Sanghiyo ka overexaggerated nhi ki duniya ka har ek chiz Hinduism/Brahminism/Vedism se shuru hua hai, humare purvajo ke paas sab kuch tha etc. 😁
@@manaspratimdas707 Out of context baat na le ja. Jo bhi tumne bola wo sab ka mere iss comment se kya lena dena ? Lagta hai naye naye atheist bane ho iss liye garmi jade hai😁
Noted 👍
@@chalbaatkar Thankyou bhaiya 🙏
You are one of the neutral podcast channel 👍
Bulao unko ghost,reincarnation wala video dekha h mene🎉
This guy was bullying me two days ago 😂
Called 8 times on Instagram... Used foul language and all. What I did ? I commented on his reel. Asked him for a debate on a public platform, said no many times not to do it in Instagram DM. He insisted a lot so I just asked one question on his fear mongering reel of Muslim population growth and he had no answers, he was just pushing again and again this one pew research article. He clearly understood my point on fear mongering but had no answers. I pity people like him, after talking so much religion they don't have basic decency to talk and debate. And they ask where do atheists get their morality from
"Mere sath ye hua hai" "trust me bro"🤡
@@HinduPhoenix I don't care
@@HinduPhoenix 😂
@@Observer52 😅😅 my comment got deleted where I said I will provide evidence....
Such bs creators should not be indorsed
As expected in comment section nobody is interested in probing and dissecting the epistemological and metaphysical arguments and discussion being purported in the video, sab bas tu - tu mai mai kar rahe hai, its mostly because ye video dekhne ke baad they are probably going to watch some vacuous and reductionist political commentary which does nothing but instill a sense of antagonism in them and wisdom is antithetical to vehemence, anyways my personal takeaway is that from a materialist position you could have probed him about Daniel dennet and his views on consciousness, nature and problem of evil and the concept of hard empiricism since he subscribes to an analytical idealistic point of view. i think he is the most erudite guest on the show so far, i would personally wish that you invite people like nihilanand etc to know a bit more about antinatalism. All the best
Hi sir
What Dennet says or analytical idealism are just ideas... Out of many ideas. Nothing special. It is very common, people talk about it a lot.
@yoyo17356 this guy is worse.. Look for my comment in the comment section... What he did
.This channel is restricting all my comment... Can't see my comment in this thread as well. And they talk philosophy and all
@yoyo17356 I don't know.... But I have a comment in the chats read it
They are internet atheists. They want to project themselves as superior rational and free thinkers despite the fact that they cannot argue philosophically.
This person was so humble, rational and open-minded🙌👏
12:00 people dont have any problem
Its just they oppose many festivals which contain many society problems
U cannot support so called cultral hindu muslim christian marrige sabe me patriarchy hai its just an example of things
So its a symbolic cristism against culture
People who criticise also might celebrate some same cultural events which they find less harmfull
True 💞💞💞
S;aste-d;esi-ath;eists do h;ave prob;lem w;ith it.
Sin;ce wh;en th;ese 2k ut;ubers be;gin to th;ink ab;out soci;ety?
Aap oxford university ki books refer kar rhe par yha ke log to uski translation aur interpretation ko bhi milavati bol denge.
😂😂😂
1:37:09.... A;theism m;ein k;uchh ho;na b;hi t;oh ch;aahiye b;aat r;akhne ke l;iye.
Fehko poori shakti k saath🤸 Bye
Your Podcasts are really very informative and satisfying.
Happy to hear that! 😊
Mujhe na Theist banna hai aur na Atheist. Mai apni life full freedom aur happiness ke saath jeena chahta hu. Bina iss baat ki chinta kiye ki God hai ya nahi. Bina iss baat ko saabit kiye ki God hai ya nahi hai. 😊
Th;en you are agn;ostic l;ike Bhar;gav.
23:26 i would like to correct that there exist mathematical proof for second law of thermodynamics through carnot cycle. (This proof essentially begins with proving that there exist no thermodynamic cyclic process that is more efficient than a carnot cycle for same state And from here we establish the clausius inequality thus defining entropy)
Not to mention in statistical mechanics there also exist proof of it historically it was empirical tho later mathematical formulation was derived.
चलो भाई अब physics पढ़ना छोड़ दो,philosophy पढ़ो ,भार्गव philosophy को ज्यादा महत्व का बता दिया हे इससे ही दुनिया चलेगी अब, हमें केवल logic लड़ाना हे evidence की कोई जरूरत नहीं ,logic से ही proof हो जायेगा अब सब
Ha bhai tera duniya physics se hi chalti hai 🤡
@@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536 meri nahi sabki,physics se hi chal Rahi gravitation law,electromagnetism,quantom etc इन सबके evidence है अगर इनमें कोई theory हे तो testified हुए बिना वो accepted नही मतलब logical बोल बच्चन accept नही
@@Manoj_0000 hn hn jaise so called thiest haters/athiests ke baap ne discover kiya h n physics😂
@@VFX_BUDDY और philosophy theist/atheist hater ने किया हे😄
Vedas mein ethics 🤡💩
Yes vedas me ethics hai.
Kabhi vedas ko padha bhi hai ?
Ashtadhyay, Nirukt, Alankar, Vyakaran ki knowledge ke bina vedas pe muh utha ko hagne aa jate ho 🤡
Abhi vedas ke ek mantra ka padartha ka ashtadhyay se bashya puch lunga tho fatt ke 4 ho jayegi.
You seems like, you don't basics of multiply, addition, division and wanna talk about Integration.
Go learn vedic vyakaran than talk about vedas.
Glory to vedas 🗿
Nalla person 🤣 Kabhi Ved khol ke PDI bhi nhi hogi 🤣
अवर्त्या शुन आन्त्राणि पेचे न देवेषु विविदे मर्डितारम् । अपश्यं जायाममहीयमानामधा मे श्येनो मध्वा जभार ॥ 13 ॥
भूख से पीड़ित होकर हमने अभक्षणीय श्वान की अंतड़ियों को भी पकाया, तब हमारे निमित्त देवताओं में इन्द्र के अतिरिक्त कोई अन्य सुख देने वाला नहीं हुआ। जब हमने अपनी पत्नी को अपमानित होते हुए देखा, तब इन्द्र ने ही हमें संरक्षित करते हुए मधुर रस प्रदान किया।
रिग वेद का 4 मंडल 13 सूक्त
@@mauryan12144.13.1, 4.13.2 ya kaun sa😂? Liar.
Logically science की कई theory exist करती हे मगर scienctific नही मतलब सच नही क्योंकि सबूत नहीं ,बस एक दिमागी मोज हे
Triangle is abstract entity of maths. But we can observe things that are approximately equivalent to triangle in nature. So, not 100% equivalent but for practical purposes yes its fine. As, nothing is 100%, as whole world could be in matrix. But we believe what evidence our senses tells us and verify with other people. Similarly, if abstract concept and laws of triangle allow methods for real world calculation of trigonometry whith quite accuracy.
But god is not the same. God doesn't come with a methodology, nor can you prove existence of god in real world with evidence. If people claim that god is just experience in senses then, but not in real world. Then god is very pleasurable hallucinatory experience. At this point why call it god (as it is misleading) just call it a psychological/hallucinatory experience.
In conclusion -
Existence of god claim is misleading
Experience of very pleasurable hallucinatory experience isn't misleading. So, more honest seeker would call it an psychological state not "god being real" claim.
He just explained the methodology 😆 🤣
@@anchitbose4151 i saw. He didn't explain a proof of god. He only made analogy. Comparison of maths with idea of god is Not same.
@@Lemon-lp1qb he never claimed God definitely exists in the first place. However proof of God exists even if not the definite proof
@@anchitbose4151 hm we can not presuppose what we are trying to prove. If you are going to say "we presuppose laws of logic also". That's because we can verify them when we apply it in real world.
We studied real-world found common patterns refined them into laws of logic. (Descriptive laws). What real world observations leads to idea of god?
Also, the only commonality between god and maths is both concepts are abstract. But subtle difference is utility. Maths has utilised in understanding and predicting behaviour of phenomena. But god doesn't. The only utility idea of god was to bind people in stories and make tribe more close and strong to drive cooperation, binding in a certain motility that god/religion preaches. I.e. social cohesion. But as time passed we also became aware of bad sides religion/god. i.e. appeals to authority. A single person could easily gain power. Thats why we came up with better imaginary constructs to organise society i.e. democracy. Thus god even as an imaginary construct doesnt have value in my opinion. For some people it might provide emotional value. But so can therepy, meditation etc that are not based on supernatural claims.
Hindu atheist hi kyu bolna hai ? Indian Culture hai toh "Indian atheist(Bhartiya Atheist)" ya fir "Indian Agnostic(Bhartiya Agnostic)" bolo na bhai... Simple hai...
Baki fir agar nahi toh Yeh toh wahi baat ho gayi tunniyo wali...
Because Bharatiya = hindu
@@anchitbose4151 no
All Hindu= Bhartiya ✅
All Bhartiya=Hindu ❌
Atheist to atheist hi hoga na irrespective from what cultural background they come from
@@manaspratimdas707agar morden sense mai bole to yess. But historical sense mai dheke to no. Cause indus ke iss taraf ke log sab Hindus the😊.
Nirishwarawadi they historically bhi yha pe ,hindu ek umbrella term h
Why this guy reminds me Ranveer Allahbadia.😅 just over reacting, no counter questions. Bring Vimoh in the debate then see 😂
Bro this bhargava is such a lame guy he abused vimoh and strawmanned his atheist definition to show himself superior or more intellectual 😂 ,watch his that video from somewhere
Absolutely correct.
Host is ranveer allabadia. He know nothing. He has camera Mike and data only .No mind.
Kuy Tu nahi kar sakta
Vimoh ka naam mat le. Vimoh ki fatt jati hai dusro ke podcast pe debate karne ke liye.😂😂
Vimoh ka time waste hoga
Bring mohit gaud of vigyan darshan channel..arpit ka muh phut chuka hai ab vimoh ka bhi futega. 😂
SANGHI BRA-MAN 🤬🥃💪
This guy talking like achary parsaant
How?
About the evidence, science, phil. of Science (basic level)
you can take "Philosophy of Humanities" mini lecture series, from Leiden University.
Whoever reading the comments✌️
Bh;argav, a m;enace for s;aste-d;esi-ath;eist a;nd neo-ch;uddhists.
just throwing up information - what exactly they are discussing or dubunking? -what is argument or conter argument?
This @ProjectSatyaloka is such a lame guy , he straw-manned Vimoh's atheist definition and abused him , such a loser , i wont even watch this podcast, but i have watched all yr podcasts and liked most of them
Yeah just because you say
Vimoh himself deletes comments who counter him.
Vimoh disables comments on is insta and censors them on his YT channel. He is a lame internet atheist
Lol! He has logically criticized Vimoh on his Instagram reels. Secondly, since when you guys have a problem with so called abuses? Isn't vimoh abused many theists and religious practices in his videos? Khudh pe aata hai tho problem kyu hai?
Bhai vimoh aur bhargava ki debate krba do mja ayga aap inn dono k friend hoto pls unko bolna kafi kuch saaf ho jyga... Bhargava debunk kr raha h vimoh ko but this is one way conversation counter m vimoh ne kuch nhi bola but dono sath m debate krenge to bht kuch samne ayga....
Bhargava khta h ki wo phd student h aur usne religion god atheism ka gyan h to vimoh se unki debate krvao taki pata chale ki really m h bhi ya nhi...
Kyunki hum sab khud to ye sab book pd nhi skte kaam chhod so agar aap kr ske to krna ols
C;ounter m;ein k;aise bol;ege vim;oh......fss j;ayega f;ir vo.
J sai deepak- bhargav तू कहां था हम दोनो एक ही party के हे,पढ़े लिखे लोगो का दिमाग घुमाते हे ,मेरे भाई हमको मिलके काम करना चाहिए😂
@yoyo17356 j Sai भी lawer है,california में पढ रहा,तो क्या कुछ भी बोलेगा और हम मान ले,ये बंदा का insta देखा मेने खुद bhraman हे और parshuram को ताकतवर बताकर anime बनाया हे,वो परशुराम जिसने सभी क्षतियो को मार दिया ये फर्जी कहानी जिसमे bhramano को society में क्षत्रिय बना दिया मतलब सबसे ऊंचा जिसने क्षत्रीय को भी मर दिया,और उनकी विधवा से विवाह कर लिया,उस परशुराम जिसने अपनी मां को मार दिया ये भी उसको philosoohy से defende करता हे ऐसे अनेतिक superiority से भरे काम को,और हम भोले लोग इसके फर्जी philosophy को सुनकर जिसका ना science को कुछ काम ना ही practical Life में, प्रभावित होकर इसकी हर बात मन लेते है,इसने जो भी बोला उसे कोई भी समझ सकता हे मगर जो बोला उसका काम कुछ भी नही,सिर्फ मौज हे एसी दिमागी मौज का क्या करे भाई,ये खुद indian religion superiority से biased है,
Dhruv University be like "bhai vimoh tu kaha hai, hame logo ko manipulate aur one sided fact bhi toh dene hai"
@@trueRationalThinker bhargav keval recorded video banata he,vimih live आता हे जिसमे दूसरा साइड उसके साथ debate कर सकता हे ,तो कोन दो साइड और कोन एक side हे इसका सबुत तो मेने दे दिया,अब इतना ही तुम भार्गव का दो साइड होने का मजबूत सबूत दो ,record video का मत कहना वो vimoh भी बनाता है,live की बात ही अलग हे,live के record में bakvas galti पकड़कर खुद को hero बनाना आसान हे,live में आना कठिन
@yoyo17356 तुम्हारी analogy सही नही हे,जब किसी मुद्दे पर अलग विचार रखने वाले debate करेंगे तो लोग decide करेंगे क्या सच क्या गलत,भार्गव ने पहले point उठाया था तो उसको विमोह के पास जाकर प्वाइंट रखना था record करने से चीज़े clear नही होती ,इसलिए vimoh ज्यादा हिम्मत वाला काम कर रहा हे मेने ये नही कहा की विमोह सही हों जायेगा मगर विमोह ने चीज खुली रखी हे और भार्गव केवल record video बनाता हे, वो भी पूरे context को हटाकर ,जो की रिकार्ड video में होता ही हे,व्यक्ति चालबाजी कर जाता हे,debate ,वो भी live में चालबाजी काम नहीं आती,तुम्हारे analogy में तुमने अब्दुल कलाम को लिया जो मिसाइल बनाना जानते थे मगर यहां ये confirmation नही हे की भार्गव जानता हे या वो जो बोल रहा वो सच हे
Bhai vimoh ne ek video jsai Deepak pr banaya hai aur uska reply ek kolkata college street channel Bengali creator hai usne Diya hai uska video bhi dekho Maine saare dekh liye usne vimoh ko 10 12 std commie bola hai mai neutral hoon dono dekhe vimoh ka j sai ke upar plus reply by Bengali creator channel name kolkata college street
Hindu atheist koi position nhi ek doglapan h
Ok what defines the hindu identity
@@anchitbose4151 Ye log constitution ki hi definition dekh lete to itna nahi bolte 🤡
A;theism ki posi;tion hi f;lawed h;ai.
Looks like all are against him here
Side e;ffect of a;theism(a cu;lt).
Vimoh must debate him
THIS BRA-MAN WANTS AMIT TIWARI 🤬🥃💪
Vim;oh di;d deb;ated h;im b;ut di;dn't rele;ase the v;ideo.😂
He is wonderfully manipulating the words there is no god and creator of universe that is Atheism ⚛️⚛️ If you want to represent yourself culturally we can say we are INDIANS 🇮🇳🇮🇳
Have studied philosophy in university?
@@anchitbose4151 If he is a philosophy student he should talk about that and should not mislead the concept of Atheism
@@sudeepheni6016 athiesm is a part of philosophy lol 😆
@@anchitbose4151 But it is against to religious philosophy 🤣🤣
@@sudeepheni6016 philosophy of which religion?
Bhai god ka logic kaha hai
What is god
@@ShunyamDhruw I am god 😂
I agreed with him his descriptions of agnosticism.
That's an interesting comparison. However, there's a key distinction between the acceptance of complex numbers in mathematics and belief in a deity.
Complex numbers, though abstract, are defined within the framework of mathematics with clear rules and applications that can produce meaningful results. They solve equations like , and are used extensively in fields such as engineering, physics, and computer science, where they provide practical and consistent utility.
The concept of God, on the other hand, tends to involve metaphysical claims about the nature of reality that go beyond empirical observation and experimentation. While complex numbers are a tool invented to solve certain problems within mathematics, the existence of God is a matter that goes beyond a self-contained system of definitions and rules and is instead a claim about the fundamental nature of reality.
34:06 थॉमस &hz experience
2_2=4. There are two possible answers , either addition or multiplication. From Young's double slit experiment we know that electrons have wave like nature. Dual nature. Later on de broglie says every matter is associated with a wave. Since lambda is small due to higher mass, we see a particle as particle not a wave.
Culture is not the only constituent of any religion....but religion constitute culture into itself.....the way we celebrate festivals..... it's not written into any hindu text....diwali is not about diya and crackers and even ganesh and laxmi worship....holi is never about colours in any book.....
There is no boundary of Hinduism or sanatan.....it has taken things from other places and which has no written text or anything.....
When you call yourself hindu atheist or hindu agonist.....hindu must just be a identity but nothing else.....we can't refer to any text for the culture we practice.....and just practicing some culture cannot make you religious
And chal baat kar bhai India's history isn't that glorious for women.....even the religious texts prove it..... calling female name in worshipping and doing nothing for women is habit of hindu culture...... although indian culture has helped and questioned it all..... that's where Indian culture has been better....and just there....not on root level.....
Aur welcoming everyone is a good thing but making a big group of people secondary citizen..... it's also in our own culture..... Indian culture is not that praise worthy......
And still welcoming behaviour is under scrutiny.....so many jokes about Russian women....a man literally recorded the video while rating women
And we Indians are racist on another level.....not for foreigners only but for people coming from other parts of country
You had a good experience with a somewhat priest can be relatable for everyone because we hadn't been stuck onto religious texts so much (and that's only the good thing in Indian culture).....if we had been stuck onto it..... atheistic values and people would have been looked down upon.....no good thing is written in books for atheists....
Bhagat singh literally wrote a book Why I am an Athiest?
It's hi;s o;wn vi;ew wh;ich h;as no;thing to do u;s. E;ven Bo;se w;as inspi;red by G;eeta.
Vimoh ki fatt jati hai dusre channel par debate karne ke liye. Isliye Uska naam comments me mat lo.
Commenting for better reach
Chal baat ka हां हां क्या कर रहे वो physics का ज्ञान दे रहा kynki उस field का तुम्हे कुछ पता नहीं और तुम हां हां बोल रहे ,कोई उस field वाले को बिठायो
Baba!!!! Ye kya baba..... Videos ka baad aagaya!!!! Great efforts rockstar 💪❤❤
Shukriya Sameer bhai❤️
Mast podcast hai
Hindu is religion
We dont wanna now what Persian named them
Now its religion so it is an oxymoron obviously
Yes. But people who accept different definition, you can't force them to accept your definition.
But yeah this Hindu Atheist/agnostic is bs
Saying hindu is religion is implying that it's a single religion when it's not. Try reading about development of so called "hinduism" and it's further developments on how it shifted from preaching gods such as Indra and Agni to preaching gods such as Shiva and Vishnu which were most likely the gods aside from brahmanism. Aside from that the various schools such as sankhya and even yoga (to some extent) or nyaya are atheistic in nature. So tagging Hinduism and claiming it doesn't make sense because first of all you can't classify or generalise Hinduism as a whole you have to talk about the school and even in school there are different subschools / traditions which differ in their philosophy. The Upanishads don't even focus on the entity of "god" but more of a metaphysical entity which is the fabric of consciousness and material. Read more before claiming anything.
@@tanishqpandey7021 it doesn't even matter bro it's all how itd done
If u go tu ur mother and say hindu is not religion she would get mad at u
So what many follow that way becomes what it is in a society
If u wanna know people philosophically following their number would be the smallest minority in India lol
And if normal people read vedanta they would say it's shit coz it has no bhakti element (fr I have heard it)
And for most hindusim is just raping some sanskrit without knowing f about it's meaning
And going to mandir crying for their wish and celebrating festivals
And character gods
It's just the biggest piece of bull shit even this guy told it indirectly
At first years ago indira was the biggest God lol having a God for rain thunder education money is in everywhere we can find 70 percent similarity in Greek gods
It's just simple God of gaps
Then came ramayan which is just folk tale said in many parts of South Asia there are literally thousands of ramayana there are even ramayan where there is no ravan there are ramayan where lakshman is hero there are ramayan where sita is hero there are ramayan where sita is sister of ram
And there is no proof this braminical valmiki ramayan is first of them
There are even muslim ramayan which is really old and celebrated by some muslim majority countries in Asia
And if u go to Kerala there is mapila ramayan (mapila means slang word of calling muslim)
In which they sing Ramayana through mapila paat which is folk song genre of that region
Mahabharat is just some pure fiction and gita had only 91 verse in oldest book but it went on to improve its numbers with time btw at start it was only krishna asking arjun if u are man go to war and justifying murder is not problem
Arjun had better morals lol he refused every time
And ganapathi narasimham were just tribal gods or forest gods which got added to religion for their character survival
It's just basic instinct of tribal people to worship the thing they see as powerfull
So if a lion is causing problems in their village they would make lionxhuman statue and pray to them as it's only ray of hope
So in that way ganesh also came
In Africa u can still see lion headed man worshiped by tribes
@@anonymouspersonbehind5354 people advocate the religion part and that I agree. But hinduism is not advocated by people tbh. In the end it's the mathas and the traditions which truly advocate hinduism. Now one can say that the majority should represent what "hinduism" is and I too kind of agree to some extent but my position is actually no. Reason is that in the end the one who hold authority over the scriptures are the traditions which still hold their position. A common man's ideas (who doesn't follow the scriptures ofcourse) about their religion is not above a guru or a follower of the scriptures . Also in religious academics the scholars only consider the words of head of a traditional sect or a reputated teacher of the sect. General opinion of public is not very religious or philosophical but rather it's more politically influenced.
@@anonymouspersonbehind5354 leaving aside that topic I guess that it's not correct to say that it was originally just tribal folks because that cannot be dated either and many dieties are added much later which is probably due to some tribal religions being developed much later than formation of Vedic-hinduism. Also considering ramayana a fable or not is not of much use tbh. But the literary consistency of both Valmiki Ramayana as well as mahabharat indicates that these were written not at different periods but at same (not meaning that ramayana and mahabharat were written at same period of time but mahabharat as a whole was written at one time as a whole and ramayana was written at other time as a whole). Tbh I don't know where you got that 92 verse thing I've heard it for first time and I've never seen any academic mention of it nor in any of tradition I've heard it. Tho I've heard some verses were added to match the philosophy of some specific sect but 92 and 700 is a huge gap and bhagwad Geeta is a prasthan-traya granth primarily so the deviation you're talking about doesn't make sense
Bhagwan naam bhi to insaan ne diya hai, jo hai, uska naam wo hi janta hoga,
BrahmSutra me kaha hai `` Rasho ve shh " Shh mean `` woh = that ".
To wo hai ya nahi ye koi prouf koi de nahi sakta, usko jo bhi naam tum doge wo `` Tatti " Ho jayega,
Or jise log creater kehte hain,
uski `` MKB "
Triangle is dimensional figure then how can you draw dimensional figure without dimension 😂😂
Kuch bhi gapod Lila chal Rahi is bhargav bande ki, oversmart he bus ,sach kuch nahi
Bhargav bhai, why don't you start a podcast yourself?
@projectsatyaloka
27:59 it's red herring nothing else
Love from a rationalist from uttar pradesh.
8:37 Hindu kuch na tha na hoga, jatiwaad tha bas aur hai
Jatiwaad tha par ab km h aur bhavish m naa rhega ...
43:15 😮
Chal bat kar किसने बोला culture से अलग होने को ,क्यों झूठ बोल रहे,मेने भी कई atheist को सुना दिवाली holi को मानने celebrate करने को उन्होंने माना नही बोला ,छोटी बच्ची हो क्या,कोई एक ने तुम्हे प्रभावित किया इसलिए दूसरे को बस गलत बता दो अलग होने के लिए भली उसने वो बोला नहीं
Jay ho bhaya
Ye bhi center mai khelne ki koshish kr raha hai. Like ranveer yati vala banda.
Ranveer toh poora RW ban gaya hai. He is one sided now and mostly uske guests bhi one sided narrative wale hai. Aaj agar koi thoda bohut center me khel raha hai toh woh hai I guess Dostcast wala banda.
@bhargava ye sab gapod @Science Journey ke saath mat karna, bura expose karega tujhe 😂
Lol how exactly??
But aap ke science journey ko tho maine hi live debate me ghuss ke dhoya tha🙄
Even Vigyan Darshan ne tho usko utha utha ke dhoya tha.
And vo SJ itna azib banda hai ki jab usko koi counter karta hai tho baar baar mute kar deta hai😑
Ek kaam karo usko Science Journey nahi Mute Journey kaha karo.
Bhai, Science Journey ka Qualification kya hai🤣 Science Journey khadey kahedy moot de, Bhargav ke Samney😂
Science journey is only good for rationalising people from poverty prone areas where there is abundance of superstition. Urban people wont buy anything he says.
@@AzibGhadi video kaa koi link?
Advaita vedanta wale hamesha hi chidhe rehte nastik se 😜
Nastik ka arth pata bhi hai?
👏👏👏
Hindu Atheist, Muslim atheist, christian atheist bhai ye sab doglapana haine and calling an atheist a hindu is like calling an ex Muslim a Muslim ager maine kahta hu maine atheist Muslim hun maine namaz partu hun roza rakhti mashjid jati hun Allah hu alla hu karti isn't it sounds confusing?kya esi nastikta kaha jay ga?. And culture is not only about religion culture isse bhi zada bada haine religion ko inkar kadne se culture kho jay ga nahi. Our hindu findu bolkar kuch nahi hota ye nam to Persians o ne diye thi. Bharat ki mitti ki khudai karne ke bad buddha ka hi murti milta haine ram, krishna, shiv inke murti kyun nahi milti? Our samrat ashok ke hi lipi milti haine.Besically india was Buddhist country so Hinduism manne se ya na manne se culture khatmo nahi hi jayga
Nastikta h hi nhi it is agyeyvasd agnosticism .
I don't know why this person thinks complex numbers are totally imaginary.
He doesn't.
Looks like guy who finds athiesm cool but also likes his religious side and unable to leave that. So apna khud ka bana lo ek duniya.😂😂
I want to discuss Patanjali’s definition or expression of Isvara with you guys. How should I connect?
A beautiful podcast by the way! 🙏
Bro just a advice please next time do add subtitles or speak in English, it’s hard for the rest of India to understand when many non hindi Indians want to be closer to the dharmic philosophy.
I don't know how can I do it ...is there any AI/software for this?
@@chalbaatkar not sure bhai
So you are saying that god is invention of human like human invented numbers?
Then give me a valid reason for god. Common i am all ears.
Cosmological argument, particularly the concept of first cause and the unmoved mover.
@@Assault_Rifle-777 How can you be 100% sure that god is the first cause? Did you conduct any tests to conclude it? Just because we can't know what is before the big bang that doesn't mean, it's the work of God. It's just an assumption, not a proof.
I love this Guy😘
Naya Ranveer Allahbadia.
Bringing anybody into podcast, next time just go and ask your neighbor , your haircutter, random salesman, swiggy delivery for the podcast.. Atleast there will be less chance to be pretentious and fake like this one
Meta physics 🤡💩💩
Aap nāstika ho ki āstik?
Nastik
Agnostic h vo
@alinax64 I understood that but in terms of belief in the vedas, where does he see himself?
@alinax64 a samkhya follower can be agnostic
Do ghante ki maansik ayyashi.
😂 fir se school jane ke jarurt hai tumlogo ko or acha school me
why?
Yeh jo purana,bramha,Shiva, shakti inke ware me bol rha wo western, Marxist view point se bol rha hai...
Jo pahle se maan liye the alag alag religion ka jambvda hai Sanatan dharm.
Jabki asa nhi hai.
Purana ki baat ved, bramhan granth,upnishad me hai.
Bramhan granth bhi ved me count hote hai.
Chanakya ke time 18 purana the..
Aab isko yeh log later addition kahe kar chalate hai...
Alag alag devta ki baat kar rahe wo Western mindset hai.
Ved me jo devta hai wo bramh hi hai jo ase bivin naam roop me apper karte hai...
Yeh thik wase hai ek Muslim Christian Sanatan dharm ki explanation de raha ho. Jaise western logo ne arya ek insan ke quality ko nasal se jodh diya.
Yeh sab thod dalo raaz karo ka niti hai..
Kaal log ko provoke karenge arey tumhara sanatn dharm alag alag religion ka hai.. tum swatantra ho.
Sanatan dharm me ek na ho.. tum ek nhi the kabhi.
Ved, upnishad shruti sastra hai aab kisi ek samay lipi vadh kiya iska matalb yeh nhi ki wo pahle nhi the. Shurti the baad me kisine likha.
Aur purana cosmic, devi devta ki story hai.
Uska compilation kiya ved vyas ji ne.. mahabharata yudh khatam hone ke baad..
Jisko aap laye ho wo sastra ko upper upper se hi samjhe hai.
Adhatma hinta dikh rha unme bas.
Isliye Shiva, vaisnav, shakt ko folklore tradition bata rahe kyun inhone pahle se hi maan Liya ase hi hai..
"Ken upnishad" me devi shakti ka varnan hai aab isko bhi kahenge addition.
Aab yehi hua subject kisi aur ka lekin manyata tay karenge western aur Marxist log...