This video demonstrates how to conduct a Chi-Square Test of Independence in SPSS. Calculating and interpreting Cramer’s V and the risk estimate are reviewed.
Cramer's V values- a measure of association telling us how important our findings are. 0= no relationship 0.2 or less= a weak relationship 0.2 to 0.3= moderate relationship, 0.3 and up= a strong relationship
thank you so much for your explanation. Dr. Grande, I have a paired categorical data and I am supposed to used Mcnemar test but my data is not dichotomous, should I use Kappa?
Hello Dr. Grande, I've run a chi-square of independence test that resulted in a 3x5 table. My problem is the following: my table did not meet the expected frequencies assumption for chi-square, therefore I should not interpret the Pearson's chi-square statistic, right? I watched your video on the Fisher's exact test, and apparently my sample is not small enough (N=100) for that either. With all of that said, could I interpret the Likelihood Ratio instead of the Pearson's chi-square statistic?
Hello Doctor. May you clarify a doub of mine?! do we use Phi or Cramer's V only for chi-square, or it is vaild even for Fisher exact test and other test for categorical data? THANKS IN ADVANCE
hello Dr Grande.. sorry I have a different SPSS question. I am trying to crosd validate two different likert scales (6 & 7 point likert scales). Can O just simply run a correlations test on them or do I need any additional steps (standardize?) thanks so much in advance.
hi @ katie can you source d paper which interpretate cramer's v in the terms you mentioned, because i have to add a source for my interpretation and i was nt abt to find it.
Cramer's V values- a measure of association telling us how important our findings are.
0= no relationship
0.2 or less= a weak relationship
0.2 to 0.3= moderate relationship,
0.3 and up= a strong relationship
What is your reference?
@@alicepel2992 it's mentioned in the video but I am also needed a reference. Did you ever find out?
@@samanthadesilva9740 Sorry, I haven't found the reference yet.
@@alicepel2992 I needed a reference too! Did you manage to find it?
whether Cramer V will take negative value.
Thank you for the step-by-step instructions Dr. Grande!
Seeing how to conduct a chi - square in SPSS is nice because it makes it so much simpler, and can be used a lot with correlational research.
Excellent video. I really enjoyed your explanation of how to interpret the output.
Years ago, I taught the Chi-Square test in IB math studies. This is a great example.
I liked how the risk estimate chart tells exactly how more times one variable is likely of doing something compared to the other variable.
Yes, very helpful, I learned how to test for assumptions for the Chi-Square Test. Thanks.
Thank you. I find all your videos useful and helpful 😊
Thx for this helpful explanation. After several times through I think I am getting it.
Thank you for the clarification of assumptions and chi-square
Thank you Doc for this video.
thank you so much for your explanation. Dr. Grande, I have a paired categorical data and I am supposed to used Mcnemar test but my data is not dichotomous, should I use Kappa?
thanks for your step by step instruction
CANNOT thank you enough for this!
Thank you so much! Great explanation
So, we can use this to see how strong a relationship is between two variables. This was relatively easy to understand.
needed this! thank you!
Can you please provide the reference for estimating the strength of association of Cramer's V? >0.3 strong relationship???
I hope you still use this channel. I really need help putting all my data together. This was the test I had planned to use, and I really need help.
Thank you very much for sharing this video
Dr. Grande, I was wondering if you don't always have to weight cases by frequency when running chi-square?
This video has been helpful, although I'm sure that I'll have to watch a few more times to ensure I am interpreting correctly.
Very helpful - thank you!
Hello Sir, Does the interpretation of the values of the cramer's test remain the same for asymmetric tables as well?
Thanks Dr. Grande.
Hello Dr. Grande,
I've run a chi-square of independence test that resulted in a 3x5 table. My problem is the following: my table did not meet the expected frequencies assumption for chi-square, therefore I should not interpret the Pearson's chi-square statistic, right?
I watched your video on the Fisher's exact test, and apparently my sample is not small enough (N=100) for that either.
With all of that said, could I interpret the Likelihood Ratio instead of the Pearson's chi-square statistic?
Very useful, thank you very much.
excellent explanation
helped me clarify the next steps
What is the difference between the Cramer V and the Pearson correlation coefficient. I feel as if they serve the same purpose
Thank you!
sir plz tell me in my excel sheet i dint find anolysis from ware u got xl sheet im using windowes 1o
Hello Doctor. May you clarify a doub of mine?! do we use Phi or Cramer's V only for chi-square, or it is vaild even for Fisher exact test and other test for categorical data? THANKS IN ADVANCE
hello Dr Grande.. sorry I have a different SPSS question. I am trying to crosd validate two different likert scales (6 & 7 point likert scales). Can O just simply run a correlations test on them or do I need any additional steps (standardize?) thanks so much in advance.
dr Grande,
Can i use chi sq for three binary groups (yes, no each)?
Hi... On Cramers V interpretation, can you share some published references for the one you used in this video?
hi @ katie can you source d paper which interpretate cramer's v in the terms you mentioned, because i have to add a source for my interpretation and i was nt abt to find it.
Chi-Square test of Ind. is an easy way to see the relationship between the two variables.
Does the use of cramers vi, depend on whether chi-square significance?
whether cramer v will indicate the direction of relationship that is positive or neagtive.
Dear Tood, I'm researcher in Spain, and I would like to ask you something related to one survey that I did.
Isn't the independent variable (gender) supposed to go into column(s) and the dependent variable (outcome) into the row(s)?
Yes for readability, but in reality chi square does not consider direction so you will get the same results if you tried either way
I'm not sure how I got here but I think I'm going to have to swim through this one a few times to figure it out.
Is Cramer's V considered a post hoc statistic for the Chi Square?
+Adam Wilson Cramer's V is a measure of association used with Chi-Square, but it is not a post hoc test like a Tukey or Scheffe would be for ANOVA.
I learned cramers v is a measure of association and 0 is no relationship and above .3 is strong relationship.