Is there more matter between the surface and center? Does gravity pull where the most mass is? Does matter get pulled from the center? Would there be negative gravity at the center?
why are you reducing the whole earth's volume when we are falling in? I get that the side of the earth's crust we jumped from and is now above us, is no longer attracting us gravitationally. But the crust on the opposite side of the earth still is.
Nevermind. I guess that if we count the opposite side crust's mass, then the center of gravity of the mass attracting us would be further away, thus cancelling out the need of taking the extra mass into account.
It must be opposite in center of Earth in mass center must be maximum force and maximum g value that how thermonuclear sum gravity works massive mass of sun squeezes hydrogen in the center of Sun to the point more than 5 mullion Kelvin temperature and the fission reaction of hydrogen nucleus reaction happens same to black holes Schwartzchild radius gravity squeezes into very small ball. That is model of heliocentrism is wrong or g=0 in the center of Earth is wrong.
You're confusing pressure and density with force. Yes, pressure and density will be at their maximum at the centre. But if you can imagine a cannonball right at the centre, then all the mass of the earth is outside it. Every molecule of the earth is attracting the cannonball but they're all evenly distributed all the way around so it's being pulled evenly in every direction. Net gravitational force on the cannonball = zero.
He's using 'heliocentrism' like it's a debatable term which suggests he's a flat earth proponent (yes, unfortunately, they do exist in this day and age). Flat earthers are _very_ confused about density. And magnetism. And electrostatics. And astronomy. And seismology. And logic. ... etc, etc, etc.
@@davelister2961 At least they don't use argument of "leap of faith" or you "heliocentric model" cannot explain Google maps oil rigs that are 80 km from shore but not go from the camera view - mirage, air index of refraction etc.. "Leap of faith" argument smells like "scientism" cult not genuine science. And using "confused" argument to explain density, free fall g=0 in the center of Earth. If you dug tunnel through Earth ,Google search answer is: The correct answer is (ignoring heat and air resistance) that something dropped down a hole through the center of the earth would accelerate all the way to the center, then decelerate as it passed center, and would stop at the opposite end of the hole (earth's surface) and fall back, repeating the cycle. Flat earthers? Earth can be: convex, flat, concave. Concave or (Hollow Earth) is true reality. Gravity force is not pulling but pushing force from center of geocentric model. Flat earth - red herring (a clue or piece of information that is, or is intended to be, misleading or distracting.). When logic hits heliocentric model you always can use "strawman" argument to say you don't understand, confused or call flat earther.
Is there more matter between the surface and center? Does gravity pull where the most mass is?
Does matter get pulled from the center?
Would there be negative gravity at the center?
nice video
You made it easy for me thanks❤
You're welcome 😊
nice one bro
why are you reducing the whole earth's volume when we are falling in?
I get that the side of the earth's crust we jumped from and is now above us, is no longer attracting us gravitationally. But the crust on the opposite side of the earth still is.
Nevermind. I guess that if we count the opposite side crust's mass, then the center of gravity of the mass attracting us would be further away, thus cancelling out the need of taking the extra mass into account.
I would love to see this video but with everything taken into consideration, including density changes.
It must be opposite in center of Earth in mass center must be maximum force and maximum g value that how thermonuclear sum gravity works massive mass of sun squeezes hydrogen in the center of Sun to the point more than 5 mullion Kelvin temperature and the fission reaction of hydrogen nucleus reaction happens same to black holes Schwartzchild radius gravity squeezes into very small ball. That is model of heliocentrism is wrong or g=0 in the center of Earth is wrong.
You're confusing pressure and density with force. Yes, pressure and density will be at their maximum at the centre. But if you can imagine a cannonball right at the centre, then all the mass of the earth is outside it. Every molecule of the earth is attracting the cannonball but they're all evenly distributed all the way around so it's being pulled evenly in every direction. Net gravitational force on the cannonball = zero.
He's using 'heliocentrism' like it's a debatable term which suggests he's a flat earth proponent (yes, unfortunately, they do exist in this day and age). Flat earthers are _very_ confused about density. And magnetism. And electrostatics. And astronomy. And seismology. And logic. ... etc, etc, etc.
@@davelister2961 At least they don't use argument of "leap of faith" or you "heliocentric model" cannot explain Google maps oil rigs that are 80 km from shore but not go from the camera view - mirage, air index of refraction etc.. "Leap of faith" argument smells like "scientism" cult not genuine science. And using "confused" argument to explain density, free fall g=0 in the center of Earth. If you dug tunnel through Earth ,Google search answer is:
The correct answer is (ignoring heat and air resistance) that something dropped down a hole through the center of the earth would accelerate all the way to the center, then decelerate as it passed center, and would stop at the opposite end of the hole (earth's surface) and fall back, repeating the cycle.
Flat earthers? Earth can be: convex, flat, concave. Concave or (Hollow Earth) is true reality. Gravity force is not pulling but pushing force from center of geocentric model. Flat earth - red herring (a clue or piece of information that is, or is intended to be, misleading or distracting.).
When logic hits heliocentric model you always can use "strawman" argument to say you don't understand, confused or call flat earther.