@@hjsegui THIS IS WHY LIBERAL FEMINISTS KEEP LOSING AND WHY THEY TEACH AND IF THAT DOESNT GO THEIR WAY THEY KEEP TRYING TO DO SOMETHING EVEN THOUGH THEY FAIL MISERABLY!!!! SO YEAH I HOPE THE EDUCATION SYSTEM FALLS FLAT ON ITS FACE ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO COLLEGES AND BLUE STATES HOMESCHOOL YOUR KIDS OR GET OUT OF THE BLUE STATES BETTER YET DEMOCRATIC RUN CITIES!!!
True, they are stuck on the word racism instead of moving on to teaching students the word respect in their own dictionarie. These teachers rather waste time on racism, than actually teaching kids those decillions of definitions on respect and testing them too with Q&A tests on respect like "What's the 2nd most important definition on respect after the respect time definition?" The answer is self respect, AKA respect your skin, respect your genes.
...so true. This leads to people make decisions based upon emotion (rioting, looting, marching) versus utilizing their intellect (debating, discussing points of view, working to have laws changed). So sad.
And sometimes not even then. All it takes is one kid with a working brain to speak up, and that's when it always devolves into that student getting yelled down.
You are so true. Let’s bring the actual adults into these classrooms and see what Ms Speech is Violence has to say. She couldn’t even answer without looking to her protestor buddies.
Their SJE nonsense doesn't work on my son. He has lost marks at university for not buying into the nonsense professors are pushing. He backs things up with facts when he goes against the narrative of some of these professors. Same nonsense happening in our Canadian Universities
Are you serious, this guy is clearly a bully and a*s-hat. She’s trying to ask if systemic racism may skew crime stats and he refuses to answer the simple question she just doesn’t have the gumption to properly stand up to him. She may have some silly ideas I’m sure, but I’m sure she also had some good points. Being an ass and talking over the top of and laughing at someone does not make you a better debater, or right.
@@alandagmar576 And I'm sure she would blame it on whatever media tells her to blame it on, in this case "men" or specifically "cis white men" or whatever it is they say right now. She would literally be "supporting the current thing" no matter what time or age we would be in.
Utube sucks! And so do stupid people's feelings! She has zero business being paid by tax dollars to teach absolute rubbish! Garbage tube censored my last text. and as far as the lawbreakers go, get them the hell out of here! they are doing no good for this country
If she was a true artist, she would not be sucked in by the current trends. Artists are supposed to think "outside the box" I think she has be taught art and is not good enough to *be* an artist, hence being faculty. But this is California so you can't really expect anything else.
@Maggie Deans Exactly. These type of 'wrong think' people she's aligned herself with are no different to those who've vilified artists for an eternity for 'wrong thinking'. Real artists are for freedom of expression, be it through words, imagery, music, on so forth. Yet she's against that. 😵
Orwell, right? Edit: I guess it's the author of the books that were adapted into GoT, don't watch it so I wouldn't know. Just sounded like something Orwell might say. Orwell said this, which I think is why I thought it was Orwell "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
Maybe she should have stopped talking and painted us a picture. They did used to say a picture paints a thousand words. Of course if they were all Leftist garbage it wouldn't really help. I'm guessing her picture would be abstract.
I've been to arts school and that has never prevented me from acknowedging that arts are good for entertainment alone, you want facts, you go to people who studied hard sciences, and even then be very careful because it's easy to fall under the fallacies of appeal to authority of "I have a degree on x or y". Luckily I've taken enough classes in things that aren't just art and humanities ti understand what a logical fallacy is.
This woman doesn’t even know what she’s talking about, she’s looking around waiting for her buddy to chirp in to save her! Perhaps if she doesn’t like our laws she can leave! Is she a American citizen!?
There is verbal assault and if its bad enough to cause a person to fear for their physical safety it can bring on a criminal charge of Disorderly Conduct. For starters. What these people are doing is conflating and twisting that to conform to their agendas. I really don't want that Brit here teaching in our colleges. Like the rest of them all she is doing is spewing talking points.
Yeah, basically poc are accessories to them, which they use to keep themselves deluded into thinking how they are some sort of moral behemoths going policing and preaching around
@Dicky Jones no. This is exactly what ibrams book was about. About how white people can't even recognize when they are being racist. Except he targeted the wrong audience. It is meant for people like her, who are judging based on skin color and not individually. She's basically saying most black or brown (or any most people), are this or that. The right seem to base on individually, the left on group.
I strongly disagree, he’s on a panel and needs to compose himself. He’s dominating the conversation, not allowing the person in the audience to attempt a complete thought, all the while using intimidation tactics if god forbid someone tried to cut in front of what he had to say. I don’t think it’s violence, but it’s stupid, and you can extrapolate how that could be violence, in different contexts. If you look at a guy like Jordan Peterson, whether or not you are convinced about the things he says, he allows those with dissenting questions or opinions to flesh out their idea. He then discusses or makes an argument out of the idea and then refute it or qualify it. It just seems like the guy on the panel is the goofy one. Not that he’s necessarily all wrong, but you have to question someone who feels the need to have a defensive response at almost everything you say. Is it really reasonable to call someone in your audience a liar on first notice? He’s being a child
Yes she was being a child. However he wasn’t attempting to qualify or discuss the claim of minorities being given harsher sentences or being convicted more often for crimes when they are committed. That is not the same thing as the person deciding to commit a crime because of their race. It seemed like he was arguing against a position she didn’t take
Actually, he tells a whole string of outright lies. I've checked a few of them personally. Knowles is a liar. He's also a bully, talking loudly over the young woman. A, vile human being he is.
When he interrupts her, it’s violent fascism. When she interrupts him, he is oppressing her with violence. This is the coin trick, “ Heads I win, tails you lose”.
"i'm an artist - therefore i know about liberal arts" - she has no effing clue what classical liberalism is - or that it was practiced by no less than our Founding Fathers... ummm - wait a second - she does sound British - perhaps she is part of a British plot to re-take America for the British Crown... =P
@@jonniiinferno9098 she’s English upper middle class with a very expensive school education. I’m English and anyone here will tell you the same. No regional accent, could be from anywhere in England. Well spoken people who have done well from humbler beginnings still have a regional accent that can be recognised even though they too have a ‘posh’ accent. It’s a large part of our culture that traces back to the rigid class system. She’s what we call ‘a spoilt little public school girl’.
Any real artist would not associate themselves with the 'wrong think' crowd, artists have been vilified by those exact type of people for an eternity, real artists hate being told what and how to think.
@@whatdoahknow3173 there is no way Michael is better than Ben. Don't get me wrong, he is certainly nicer, but if leftists weren't so stupid they would notice a lot of fallacious reasoning and evasion in some of his arguments. (Don't get me wrong, I agree with him a lot, but he just could use better arguments sometimes), Ben's vibe might come off as more aggressive, but he is both eloquent as hell and constantly logically valid (cept for that one interview on TV, which I'm still confused by).... and his wife is a doctor lmao
@@goncalobaia1574 Now that I'm thinking about it, I am closer in politics than ben because I just realized I like some other debaters that are definitely heavy-handed and it must just be the political view and maybe not quite the attitude. Because I like some of the louder with Crowder debates.
it's also egregiously insensitive to those who've actually suffered under actual fascism. Additionally - there's the uncomfortable fact that when they cast that (and most) accusation, they're overtly projecting
@@cliffordbernard7663 oop. Did I trigger a teacher here? Awwe thank you for the brainwashing narratives in the last 5 years of my life. At least I've learned the underline Misogyny in society rather than Rhetorical Essay Writing
You're absolutely correct. Teacher-activists, especially when their argument is flawed or simply bs, are worse than learning nothing. There is zero value in listening to them. If your geography teacher is a fervent flat-earther, you're better off spending your tuition on a trip to Cabo.
@@HeatBoi Don't. It's important that you firmly argue against the idiotic notion that speech is violence. Don't ever give them that one, even if you think you're turning it around on them to be clever.
@@TryMyMartini Well, I would argue that turning it around on them forces them to confront the reality that speech is indeed NOT real violence, because then they have to face the mirror for the first time in their lives.
This “professor” is the problem at most universities! She seems to have bought into the woke nonsense and put her logical thinking aside. Very very sad !! 🤦🏻♂️
Michael should know better than to look up definitions in the middle of a Q&A, we all know the wøke crowd has been hard at work changing definitions the last few years. Víolence: “actions or words that are intended to hurt people” - Cambridge University dictionary Just like “racísm” has been changed to have to have a majoríty power component, even though we all know that’s absurd and anyone of any ràce can in fact be racíst.
@@noahm44 That's fine, it can be her passion. It doesn't qualify her to have a weightier opinion on ANYTHING outside of pure art trivia. But, like most faculty, she feels that a degree in ANYTHING makes her opinion more insightful than yours on EVERYTHING. The term "pompous ass" comes to mind.
@@Ranger1PresentsVirtualRealms Right, I don't think listing off your qualifications has any bearing on the reality of things. It doesn't make you any more credible, especially when you try to use said qualifications to push an agenda. I just didn't understand the blatant attack on going to art school in general, lol.
@@noahm44 Gotcha. I'm assuming it's due to the meme of so many kids majoring in art expecting it to help them in their careers, and instead it proves to be nothing more than a heavy financial burden that never helps their future careers at all. Except for the lucky few like this instructor.
Lol this poor lady hadn’t thought her stance through, every answer he gave her she continued her stances without incorporating his answers and still was just as confused at the end as she was at the beg lol
Justin Rodriguez --- Have you ever heard of the subject called " Talking Points " ? A ' Talking Point ' would be " Gun Control " , So anyone speaking publicly who can't think will rehearse what they want to say . They will look up a bunch of information regarding this point they want to get across on the talking point ' Gun Control ' . What they wont do is research both sides of the argument , they just ' parrot ' out a few sentences . Long or lengthy debates will draw out who knows what they're talking about versus someone just repeating what ' their side ' says . You see this with Democrats and Republicans alot especially when the person in question starts saying ," I'm not sure about " or they'll say things like ," That makes no sense " repeatedly . Anyone who researches any idea or subject matter will have to look at opposing views in order to better understand not just the information but also who supplies this and what agenda they may have . Typically Leftists only regurgitate 1 side of any subject .For example lets tackle ' Rainbows ' . A Rainbow is water droplets suspended in the atmosphere that have rays of light trying to penetrate the water vapor , the result is the water droplets refract the light and thereby cause a color shift in the rays of light . Another point of view that may not be completely in opposition would be the Judeo / Christian viewpoint that God made a pact that He would not destroy the Earth by using water again and that the Rainbow was a seal to this pact , So long as there are Rainbows in the sky God will not Flood the entire Earth as he did before . A tertiary viewpoint is that the reason for Rainbows is because God needed to give the LGBTQ Community a Flag to represent them . You need to look at the Subject Matter as well as the agenda's surrounding it so that you may find a reasonable solution or affiliation . When you only examine 1 side of an argument you'll only be able to repeat what you saw or heard .
She isn't used to being in a position where people can challenge what she says based on logic and the merrits of the argument . She wins her "arguments" in a closed ecosystem where the judgment is done by her own fiat and backed up by the iron fist of passing or failing her class due to her subjective bias .
@@louisbabycos106 I love the look of bewilderment in her eyes after Knowles repeatedly shreds her. You can totally see the wheels turning in her head as she wonders why he isn't acquiescing to her tiresome progressive talking points. I'm certain she's accustomed to her impressionable students bending the knee to her narrative so why isn't he? 😆 Much like the Wicked Witch of the West has no power in Munchkinland, this sjw has no power outside of her echo-chamber classroom and she simply can't stand it. I'm sure she believes she's saving the world one student at a time, but in reality the only thing "systemic" related to her little crusade is the victim hood culture she's helping to perpetuate.
Bravo Sir! As a New American, I love everything you have to say! I spent 25 years waiting to have American rights and no joke, the day after I got sworn in lockdown happened. I want the old America back, the one my parents broke the laws to be a part of.
But he never actually told her. He made vague allusions to government records, and then failed to cite them. He's a liar, as simple as that. I checked some of the "facts" he put forward. All false. He's nothing but a bully boy who gets his kicks beating women down.
Dude I agree with Micheal’s point, but he kept interrupting her and “answering her” before she ever finished a point. We’ve got to fully listen to both sides before making comments about them
I can already see she's crazy when she insist that he should let her talk when she's the one who doesn't want to acknowledge Knowles' logical answer to HER question. Classic victim mentality. "This person is proving me that I'm wrong, but I will blame him for not letting me talk bullshit"
A very good point, but lost among this virtual lynch mob. Most people here love to see women bullied down. It makes them feel powerful. The word "destroys" resonates with the hate in the their hearts.
i'm genuinely asking, speech can be hurtful can't it? does "physical force" applied to our senses as well, in this case our hearing? if so does hurtful speech also can be categorized as violence? i live in a third world country and doesn't deal with this crap ever, just curious lol
Dismissing a teacher fro teaching at a public school just for a belief is generally prohibited as public schools need to abide by free speech laws. Also, speech slime isn’t violence, but certain speech can easily influence certain people to commit violence. Various mass shooters and other violent extremists have written manifestos that show that they were radicalized by certain speech from influential public figures.
@@technoloverish any speech can incite people to violence if they feel passionately enough about it so... people only want speech to be violent so they have 'justification' to act violently.
@Rob Roy This from WIki: "Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising."
That's not true. My college biology teacher was just out of school, and she did just fine. Now, if you're talking about ethics or psychology, better to have a more experienced teacher. Someone who's actually had a life in the real world.
@@toddnolastname4485 Sure, you can always find exclusions, my biology professor was also fairly young. She did a good job. I definitely agree with you, but even then , elder professors can still deliver better.
as Marge Simpson told Homer once when she was asked how she was going to teach piano lessons not knowing how to play herself: "all I need to do is stay one lesson ahead of the students"
unfortunately, they were first indoctrinated by commies that knew the truth - then they were elevated to professorial positions in order to corrupt the following generations with their illogical ramblings - all the while not understanding that the "education" they thought they received and continue to regurgitate is just total B.S.
You should see some of the emails I get from the art school i go to. So glad my program is online because if I had to hear that crap everyday in person I would gladly walk to prison for murder. I'm taking this program to learn how to animate and develop video games....not politics. I hate universities and colleges.
And how would you know, if she doesn't get the chance to speak? This is Knowles' basic tactic in any debate: shout down the opponents, interrupt them, don't give them a chance to make their points. If they did, his lies would be exposed. If it's a quietly spoken woman, all the better. For this kind of man, beating down a woman, verbally or physically, just feels so dang good!
@@cliffordbernard7663 Did you hear her rant? It was based on "structural racism"... What is that? So you feel women are inferior to men? "For this kind of man, beating down a woman, verbally or physically, just feels so dang good!" implies women are weak... If he had not talked over her he would never been allowed to answer because hers was a speech not a debate...
His point was that his statistics were not from an authoritative and relatively neutral source (like the federal bureaus for justice and immigration) unlike some academic journal of new age feelings
@@cliffordbernard7663 That's literally just a lie. You're complaining about him not citing his sources and yet you proceed to not only do the exact same thing, but bluntly lie about it since what he's said in this video is absolutely true and backed up by the statistics given by actual credible entities.
_"Violence isn't a subjective feeling - its an objective fact"_ Its mad that we live in a world where such a blatant and obvious observation is worthy of applause
"I've been to Art School for 8 years..." This explains A Great Deal of her "thinking". So much of Art is tied up in Emotions/Feelings. 'Facts don't care about your Feelings" Ben Shapiro (fast talking Jew)
I'm British and Embarresed that we are represented by this type of woman . Blinkered , attention seeking, ignoring the facts and hunting for a cause to improve their own self worth. Keep up the good work Michael Knowles!
Well played, Mike. However, I really need to stop watching this stuff in the morning. Causes me to start drinking way to early when I see the state of things.
I feel like for ever dumb discouraging thing we see on the internet there are a lot more encouraging things we never see online cause they don’t get clicks. Gotta be a huge discretion
Wow, did he make a fool out of her. How utterly embarrassed she must've felt. She should've kept her mouth shut, and quit while she was ahead. I wouldn't want her teaching in any college .
There's another clip doing the rounds of her butting into a conversation before she went into this talk. She came across as a complete numb nuts outside the hall and proved it with what she's saying now.
What a wealth of knowledge she must have accumulated in all of her years. She doesn't look old enough to have finished school yet and she has never experienced anything outside of academia. And, as if to prove my point, she tells us that she supports her students point of view. Shouldn't she be the one that is guiding the students? But there gain, she did have to clarify that she is an art teacher. An art teacher is someone that isn't good enough to make a living as an artist.
I watched Michael from time to time but now I have so much respects for him to stand up and talk to that woke teacher as it is. That was epic. Another foreigner coming to America and spreading more hate and divisiveness.
You respect bullies? You respect liars? Because that's all I saw on display here: aggressive bullying tactics, and lies. Knowles is a bully boy who gets his kicks beating women down.
She nervously looks around for help. These people are not used to being challenged much less hearing opposing arguments. Living in an echo chamber produces idiocy. Well done Michael. These are great.
Teachers don't teach facts anymore,, they teach feelings.
MOST OF THEM!!!! BUT I DO AGREE!!!!
Sadly men abandoned the profession and now this is the perfect liberal storm where feeling are better than facts.
@@hjsegui THIS IS WHY LIBERAL FEMINISTS KEEP LOSING AND WHY THEY TEACH AND IF THAT DOESNT GO THEIR WAY THEY KEEP TRYING TO DO SOMETHING EVEN THOUGH THEY FAIL MISERABLY!!!! SO YEAH I HOPE THE EDUCATION SYSTEM FALLS FLAT ON ITS FACE ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO COLLEGES AND BLUE STATES HOMESCHOOL YOUR KIDS OR GET OUT OF THE BLUE STATES BETTER YET DEMOCRATIC RUN CITIES!!!
True, they are stuck on the word racism instead of moving on to teaching students the word respect in their own dictionarie. These teachers rather waste time on racism, than actually teaching kids those decillions of definitions on respect and testing them too with Q&A tests on respect like "What's the 2nd most important definition on respect after the respect time definition?" The answer is self respect, AKA respect your skin, respect your genes.
...so true. This leads to people make decisions based upon emotion (rioting, looting, marching) versus utilizing their intellect (debating, discussing points of view, working to have laws changed). So sad.
And this is why they protest such discussion because they lose 10 out of 10 times, their argument works only in the classroom full of children
their only tactic is by saying how "offended" they are or using adhominems (sexist, homophobe, racist, bigot, incel, intolerant etc)
And sometimes not even then. All it takes is one kid with a working brain to speak up, and that's when it always devolves into that student getting yelled down.
You are so true. Let’s bring the actual adults into these classrooms and see what Ms Speech is Violence has to say.
She couldn’t even answer without looking to her protestor buddies.
Works only on empty headed children
Their SJE nonsense doesn't work on my son. He has lost marks at university for not buying into the nonsense professors are pushing. He backs things up with facts when he goes against the narrative of some of these professors.
Same nonsense happening in our Canadian Universities
She is a dangerous person...
She would be the first complain if illegal immigrants were housed close to her home !
Are you serious, this guy is clearly a bully and a*s-hat. She’s trying to ask if systemic racism may skew crime stats and he refuses to answer the simple question she just doesn’t have the gumption to properly stand up to him.
She may have some silly ideas I’m sure, but I’m sure she also had some good points.
Being an ass and talking over the top of and laughing at someone does not make you a better debater, or right.
@@alandagmar576 And I'm sure she would blame it on whatever media tells her to blame it on, in this case "men" or specifically "cis white men" or whatever it is they say right now. She would literally be "supporting the current thing" no matter what time or age we would be in.
I want more of these where Michael speaks publicly.
There's more on YAF's youtube channel
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
Agreed!
Utube sucks! And so do stupid people's feelings! She has zero business being paid by tax dollars to teach absolute rubbish! Garbage tube censored my last text. and as far as the lawbreakers go, get them the hell out of here! they are doing no good for this country
This woman is a perfect example of the difference between being educated or indoctrinated.
This is the perfect example of someone being educated beyond thier intelligence.
Amen to that 😊👍👏👏👏
Educated also does not mean intelligent.
Amen their a huge difference !
Haha you probably went to a private religious school, using such irony.
"I went to art school for 8 years..." LMFAO omg she shot herself in the foot with that one!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
“I’ve been to art school for eight years.”
That explains a lot.
😆☝️
she's probably a vegetarian that does yoga
If she was a true artist, she would not be sucked in by the current trends. Artists are supposed to think "outside the box" I think she has be taught art and is not good enough to *be* an artist, hence being faculty. But this is California so you can't really expect anything else.
@Maggie Deans Exactly. These type of 'wrong think' people she's aligned herself with
are no different to those who've vilified artists for an eternity for 'wrong thinking'. Real artists
are
for freedom of expression, be it through words, imagery, music, on so forth. Yet she's against that. 😵
Notice how he laughed after she said that. Lol
"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say."
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
Wow
Amen!
Orwell, right?
Edit: I guess it's the author of the books that were adapted into GoT, don't watch it so I wouldn't know. Just sounded like something Orwell might say.
Orwell said this, which I think is why I thought it was Orwell
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
They do not want the truth. Because that will make them responsible for their own actions.
"You can't handle the truth", I would replace You with They in the quote from A few Good Men.
She's an "artist" - therefore, her opinion outweighs any other. He's simply stating facts. That hurts her precious feelings? Walk out!
Maybe she should have stopped talking and painted us a picture.
They did used to say a picture paints a thousand words.
Of course if they were all Leftist garbage it wouldn't really help.
I'm guessing her picture would be abstract.
Facts is like sunlight to a vampire to a white liberal social justice warrior
It completely destroys their phony narratives
@@lldjslim "their" is possessive.
Please stop trying to change the language. Now that's a fact.
I've been to arts school and that has never prevented me from acknowedging that arts are good for entertainment alone, you want facts, you go to people who studied hard sciences, and even then be very careful because it's easy to fall under the fallacies of appeal to authority of "I have a degree on x or y".
Luckily I've taken enough classes in things that aren't just art and humanities ti understand what a logical fallacy is.
She a teacher.
"I went to arts school and i'm an artist"
Yeah, a con artist who conned herself into a teaching job.
I've never seen an 'artistic professor' that looks like an undergraduate.
Hahaha.
@@joesam7744 they're pampered and very fragile these days... that's why they're so easily broken ;)
That woman is more dangerous than B.52 bomber with the damage she can do to your children get your kids away from government education now.
@@joesam7744 Until now, that is! ; )
I think the scariest part is that you can actually attend Art School for EIGHT YEARS 😳
This woman doesn’t even know what she’s talking about, she’s looking around waiting for her buddy to chirp in to save her! Perhaps if she doesn’t like our laws she can leave!
Is she a American citizen!?
If she doesn't like democracy she can go to communist countries
She may be a citizen but she’s UnAmerican
There is verbal assault and if its bad enough to cause a person to fear for their physical safety it can bring on a criminal charge of Disorderly Conduct. For starters.
What these people are doing is conflating and twisting that to conform to their agendas. I really don't want that Brit here teaching in our colleges. Like the rest of them all she is doing is spewing talking points.
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
What is sad is that professor is profoundly racist, and doesn’t know it.
Yeah, basically poc are accessories to them, which they use to keep themselves deluded into thinking how they are some sort of moral behemoths going policing and preaching around
Young black & brown men are frustrated & violent because blonde white women like her won't give them p**sy. So who the real racist here?
Just like 99 percent of liberals.
@Dicky Jones no. This is exactly what ibrams book was about. About how white people can't even recognize when they are being racist. Except he targeted the wrong audience. It is meant for people like her, who are judging based on skin color and not individually. She's basically saying most black or brown (or any most people), are this or that. The right seem to base on individually, the left on group.
@@aweigh1010 Yes liberals support abortions. Most of abortions are done to women of color. Liberals are very racist.
"Your interupting me"
No hes responding to every seperate argument, question and diss your trying to sneak in before properly geting to your punchline
I strongly disagree, he’s on a panel and needs to compose himself. He’s dominating the conversation, not allowing the person in the audience to attempt a complete thought, all the while using intimidation tactics if god forbid someone tried to cut in front of what he had to say. I don’t think it’s violence, but it’s stupid, and you can extrapolate how that could be violence, in different contexts.
If you look at a guy like Jordan Peterson, whether or not you are convinced about the things he says, he allows those with dissenting questions or opinions to flesh out their idea. He then discusses or makes an argument out of the idea and then refute it or qualify it.
It just seems like the guy on the panel is the goofy one. Not that he’s necessarily all wrong, but you have to question someone who feels the need to have a defensive response at almost everything you say. Is it really reasonable to call someone in your audience a liar on first notice?
He’s being a child
Yes she was being a child.
However he wasn’t attempting to qualify or discuss the claim of minorities being given harsher sentences or being convicted more often for crimes when they are committed. That is not the same thing as the person deciding to commit a crime because of their race.
It seemed like he was arguing against a position she didn’t take
Actually, he tells a whole string of outright lies. I've checked a few of them personally. Knowles is a liar. He's also a bully, talking loudly over the young woman. A, vile human being he is.
@@cliffordbernard7663
1 if were saying lying is a vile act his oposition is the worst
2 what lies does he say?
When he interrupts her, it’s violent fascism. When she interrupts him, he is oppressing her with violence. This is the coin trick, “ Heads I win, tails you lose”.
“I’m an artist”.🤦🏽 Don’t think she realises that hurts her argument
you're so right!
"i'm an artist - therefore i know about liberal arts" - she has no effing clue what classical liberalism is - or that it was practiced by no less than our Founding Fathers... ummm - wait a second - she does sound British - perhaps she is part of a British plot to re-take America for the British Crown... =P
😂🤣
@@jonniiinferno9098 she’s English upper middle class with a very expensive school education. I’m English and anyone here will tell you the same. No regional accent, could be from anywhere in England. Well spoken people who have done well from humbler beginnings still have a regional accent that can be recognised even though they too have a ‘posh’ accent. It’s a large part of our culture that traces back to the rigid class system. She’s what we call ‘a spoilt little public school girl’.
Any real artist would not associate themselves with the 'wrong think' crowd,
artists have been vilified by those exact type of people for an eternity, real artists
hate being told what and how to think.
Michael is like "I'm going to be as nice as possible while I destroy you with a solid argument." 👍
He is much better in a debate than Ben is, I don't think being mean is going to help anyone.
His first response was a huge strawman LMAO
His second response literally ignorea everything she said, it can't even be considered a response.
@@whatdoahknow3173 there is no way Michael is better than Ben. Don't get me wrong, he is certainly nicer, but if leftists weren't so stupid they would notice a lot of fallacious reasoning and evasion in some of his arguments. (Don't get me wrong, I agree with him a lot, but he just could use better arguments sometimes), Ben's vibe might come off as more aggressive, but he is both eloquent as hell and constantly logically valid (cept for that one interview on TV, which I'm still confused by).... and his wife is a doctor lmao
@@goncalobaia1574
Now that I'm thinking about it, I am closer in politics than ben because I just realized I like some other debaters that are definitely heavy-handed and it must just be the political view and maybe not quite the attitude. Because I like some of the louder with Crowder debates.
Interrupting people is considered rude, conflating it with fascism is dishonest.
it's also egregiously insensitive to those who've actually suffered under actual fascism. Additionally - there's the uncomfortable fact that when they cast that (and most) accusation, they're overtly projecting
Knowles was constantly interrupting her.
Interrupting? More like answering her questions and clarifying what she’s confused about
@@ttaylor758he was clearly interrupting..
"Teachers" like her are why people look down on the education system.
Adults like you are proof the system has failed.
@@cliffordbernard7663 oop. Did I trigger a teacher here? Awwe thank you for the brainwashing narratives in the last 5 years of my life.
At least I've learned the underline Misogyny in society rather than Rhetorical Essay Writing
You're absolutely correct.
Teacher-activists, especially when their argument is flawed or simply bs, are worse than learning nothing. There is zero value in listening to them.
If your geography teacher is a fervent flat-earther, you're better off spending your tuition on a trip to Cabo.
@@prometheus5700 However, it was the idiot bloke in this case who had nothing to say.
@@cliffordbernard7663 "idiot bloke". Lol keep reaching. You had nothing good nor credible to say to begin with.
Whenever someone comes at you with "SPeEcH iS vIoLenCe!" just retort with "Okay. So shut up and stop assaulting me then. What gives you that right?"
I gotta remember this
@@HeatBoi Don't. It's important that you firmly argue against the idiotic notion that speech is violence. Don't ever give them that one, even if you think you're turning it around on them to be clever.
You NAILED it!
@@TryMyMartini Well, I would argue that turning it around on them forces them to confront the reality that speech is indeed NOT real violence, because then they have to face the mirror for the first time in their lives.
@@Navesblue You could put a mirror in their face, and they STILL wouldn't realize what they are doing.
That "professor" is frightening in her ignorance! Lord help us.
"Expand your definition of violence...to everything I don't like"
This “professor” is the problem at most universities! She seems to have bought into the woke nonsense and put her logical thinking aside. Very very sad !! 🤦🏻♂️
@nick m. guess someone's in their feelings
It’s so they can justify using violence against an inconvenient truth they might hear
Michael should know better than to look up definitions in the middle of a Q&A, we all know the wøke crowd has been hard at work changing definitions the last few years.
Víolence: “actions or words that are intended to hurt people” - Cambridge University dictionary
Just like “racísm” has been changed to have to have a majoríty power component, even though we all know that’s absurd and anyone of any ràce can in fact be racíst.
"there's a difference between hate speech and speech that you hate."Tom MacDonald song: Fake woke
#HangOverGang
Perfect
tom is trash
@@3GHee4erwer There's a sign that says that in his new video, Snowflakes. Check it out, it's probably about you.
And since there is a difference. .. Hate speech does not exist.
Violence: Behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
"I've been to art school for eight years"
*Congratulations, you've wasted your life*
"I've been to art school for eight years."
For God's sake, _you have the right to remain silent_
What if that's their passion?
@@noahm44 That's fine, it can be her passion. It doesn't qualify her to have a weightier opinion on ANYTHING outside of pure art trivia. But, like most faculty, she feels that a degree in ANYTHING makes her opinion more insightful than yours on EVERYTHING. The term "pompous ass" comes to mind.
@@Ranger1PresentsVirtualRealms Right, I don't think listing off your qualifications has any bearing on the reality of things. It doesn't make you any more credible, especially when you try to use said qualifications to push an agenda. I just didn't understand the blatant attack on going to art school in general, lol.
@@noahm44 Gotcha. I'm assuming it's due to the meme of so many kids majoring in art expecting it to help them in their careers, and instead it proves to be nothing more than a heavy financial burden that never helps their future careers at all. Except for the lucky few like this instructor.
Lol this poor lady hadn’t thought her stance through, every answer he gave her she continued her stances without incorporating his answers and still was just as confused at the end as she was at the beg lol
Justin Rodriguez --- Have you ever heard of the subject called " Talking Points " ? A ' Talking Point ' would be " Gun Control " , So anyone speaking publicly who can't think will rehearse what they want to say . They will look up a bunch of information regarding this point they want to get across on the talking point ' Gun Control ' . What they wont do is research both sides of the argument , they just ' parrot ' out a few sentences . Long or lengthy debates will draw out who knows what they're talking about versus someone just repeating what ' their side ' says . You see this with Democrats and Republicans alot especially when the person in question starts saying ," I'm not sure about " or they'll say things like ," That makes no sense " repeatedly . Anyone who researches any idea or subject matter will have to look at opposing views in order to better understand not just the information but also who supplies this and what agenda they may have . Typically Leftists only regurgitate 1 side of any subject .For example lets tackle ' Rainbows ' . A Rainbow is water droplets suspended in the atmosphere that have rays of light trying to penetrate the water vapor , the result is the water droplets refract the light and thereby cause a color shift in the rays of light . Another point of view that may not be completely in opposition would be the Judeo / Christian viewpoint that God made a pact that He would not destroy the Earth by using water again and that the Rainbow was a seal to this pact , So long as there are Rainbows in the sky God will not Flood the entire Earth as he did before . A tertiary viewpoint is that the reason for Rainbows is because God needed to give the LGBTQ Community a Flag to represent them . You need to look at the Subject Matter as well as the agenda's surrounding it so that you may find a reasonable solution or affiliation . When you only examine 1 side of an argument you'll only be able to repeat what you saw or heard .
She isn't used to being in a position where people can challenge what she says based on logic and the merrits of the argument . She wins her "arguments" in a closed ecosystem where the judgment is done by her own fiat and backed up by the iron fist of passing or failing her class due to her subjective bias .
@@williamwaha3193 bro, nobody has time to read a novel. Summarize your thoughts dude.
@@louisbabycos106 I love the look of bewilderment in her eyes after Knowles repeatedly shreds her. You can totally see the wheels turning in her head as she wonders why he isn't acquiescing to her tiresome progressive talking points. I'm certain she's accustomed to her impressionable students bending the knee to her narrative so why isn't he? 😆
Much like the Wicked Witch of the West has no power in Munchkinland, this sjw has no power outside of her echo-chamber classroom and she simply can't stand it. I'm sure she believes she's saving the world one student at a time, but in reality the only thing "systemic" related to her little crusade is the victim hood culture she's helping to perpetuate.
@@toddboward4771 EXACTLY!
Bravo Sir! As a New American, I love everything you have to say! I spent 25 years waiting to have American rights and no joke, the day after I got sworn in lockdown happened. I want the old America back, the one my parents broke the laws to be a part of.
the lights are on but nobody's home with this one
I like how she says she doesn't know where he's getting his facts from and when he tries to tell her, she immediately gets upset.
But he never actually told her. He made vague allusions to government records, and then failed to cite them. He's a liar, as simple as that. I checked some of the "facts" he put forward. All false. He's nothing but a bully boy who gets his kicks beating women down.
@@cliffordbernard7663 He was explaining, obviously, but she flipped out and kept talking over him.
@@douglasmcmullen9055 I twas 99 percent the other way Douglas,. He shouted her down.
@@cliffordbernard7663 I‘m not sure if you’re trolling or just stupid.
Dude I agree with Micheal’s point, but he kept interrupting her and “answering her” before she ever finished a point. We’ve got to fully listen to both sides before making comments about them
Violence definition according to New Oxford Dictionary: “behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.”
BUt yOur InTErpREtatIon is VioLenT
"I've been to art school for 8 years"
...oh, you poor sweet summer child...
Must be nice. I went to school for a bachelors in Psychology and wasn’t radicalized by these lunatics...There is hope in the corners of America.
I can't imagine being around this insufferable woman. These libs have absolutely no sense of humor at all. Everything's so serious and so emotional.🤮🤮
@@Kit1128 They stay in a perpetual state of anger
@@scarlettrhett1575 that's true. Joyless creatures..
@@Kit1128 check out this young lady Kimi Katiti on YT, former lefty, saw the light!!!!
The most disturbing fact to me is that this WAHMAN is really teaching young people her twisted ideas...
She's actually quite polite & well spoken even though she's wrong. Why use the word "destroys"?
2:40 okaaay, she's crazy.
I can already see she's crazy when she insist that he should let her talk when she's the one who doesn't want to acknowledge Knowles' logical answer to HER question. Classic victim mentality. "This person is proving me that I'm wrong, but I will blame him for not letting me talk bullshit"
A very good point, but lost among this virtual lynch mob. Most people here love to see women bullied down. It makes them feel powerful. The word "destroys" resonates with the hate in the their hearts.
Violence - Noun - behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
The Woke Dictionary has Pronouns for Violence Ouch/Smash
i'm genuinely asking, speech can be hurtful can't it? does "physical force" applied to our senses as well, in this case our hearing? if so does hurtful speech also can be categorized as violence?
i live in a third world country and doesn't deal with this crap ever, just curious lol
@@hasansyrf I suppose by this logic if you shouted loud enough to cause hearing damage it could be considered violence. Interesting idea honestly
@@hasansyrf No speech cannot be hurtful, it can be offensive but that's entirely subjective and won't directly land someone in hospital
@@hasansyrf - Hurting someone physically, vs. hurting someone’s feelings, are vastly different.
She's just mad her Harry Potter audition didn't pan out.
LOL XD. She is a very sad person indeed. Probably broken beyond repair.
Pity. She'd have been a decent Moaning Myrtle.
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Bra.....XD
"vi-o-lence" (noun) "Behavior INVOLVING PHYSICAL FORCE intended to hurt, or kill someone or something." ~Oxford Dictionary June 2023
The dictionary doesnt define words objectively
"Talk about instability"
Any Professor who believes or thinks that speech is volence should be dismissed from teaching.
Dismissing a teacher fro teaching at a public school just for a belief is generally prohibited as public schools need to abide by free speech laws. Also, speech slime isn’t violence, but certain speech can easily influence certain people to commit violence. Various mass shooters and other violent extremists have written manifestos that show that they were radicalized by certain speech from influential public figures.
@@technoloverish any speech can incite people to violence if they feel passionately enough about it so... people only want speech to be violent so they have 'justification' to act violently.
You do know the constitution recognises that some speech is violent and therefore not protected? You do know that don't you?
@Rob Roy It's in a supreme court ruling. It is illegal to use some words. That's just a fact.
@Rob Roy This from WIki: "Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising."
She said, "do not laugh at me, do not interrupt me."
"I am Lord!"
He roasted her well. No wonder the education system is going downhill.
Imagine having to go back and teach the students who witnessed this
ID SWITCH AND MAKE SURE ALL KNOW HER FOR WHAT SHE IS A SCAMMER
I'd keep bringing up this video over and over lol
From now on her students can say "you're being violent to me for giving me a bad grade."
Violence: (noun) behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
RIGHT SHOWS HOW SMART THAT PROFESSOR IS!!!!
That teacher should be fired.
How is this student a professor? Honestly, throughout my entire college journey, I always noticed the best professors are usually 40 or over.
She’s at least 40 😂
@@fioredeutchmark "She’s at least 40"
A 40 year old who looks 15 and has the brains of a 6 year old.
Sounds about right.
That's not true. My college biology teacher was just out of school, and she did just fine. Now, if you're talking about ethics or psychology, better to have a more experienced teacher. Someone who's actually had a life in the real world.
@@toddnolastname4485 Sure, you can always find exclusions, my biology professor was also fairly young. She did a good job. I definitely agree with you, but even then , elder professors can still deliver better.
as Marge Simpson told Homer once when she was asked how she was going to teach piano lessons not knowing how to play herself: "all I need to do is stay one lesson ahead of the students"
She is a Brit and as a Brit myself, I feel thoroughly ashamed of her.
Telling the truth isn't racism it's facts.
Our education system is in total meltdown. SHAME on us for allowing educated fools to instruct our children.
unfortunately, they were first indoctrinated by commies that knew the truth - then they were elevated to professorial positions in order to corrupt the following generations with their illogical ramblings - all the while not understanding that the "education" they thought they received and continue to regurgitate is just total B.S.
@@jonniiinferno9098 100% correct. You can watch many brilliant lectures by Mark Passio for an exact BRAK DOWN of how it happens.
@@jonniiinferno9098 And Yuri Bezmenov.
@@millanferende6723 - thanks - will check him out
Webster will update the definition of violence to fit this unreasonable professor.
This is why I have older dictionaries. The newer ones will be bastardized if they aren’t already.
"I went to Art School for EIGHT YEARS!!!!"
EIGHT YEARS!!!!! REALLY?
😂😂😂
Michael absolutely destroyed her arguments 😂
Actually he didn’t, she has a point he was interrupting her speech and being an asshole
I just love how they always don't know where the statistics are coming from.
yep ... numbers don't lie.
don't confuse me with the facts....
That woman speaks as a child would. She's a college professor? Yikes.
With a “arts” degree, you can paint a picture of how you would defend yourself. With common sense, you can actually defend yourself
most likely - she only mastered the art of finger painting...
Bet she can't stay within the lines🖍
Son or daughter of mine: "May I go to this university?"
Me: "No way,...no how!"
You should see some of the emails I get from the art school i go to. So glad my program is online because if I had to hear that crap everyday in person I would gladly walk to prison for murder. I'm taking this program to learn how to animate and develop video games....not politics. I hate universities and colleges.
How in the world is that woman a teacher!!??? 🤦🏻♀️
Speech isn’t violence, but like you hurt her feelings speaking to her lol
He isn't letting her speak... because she isn't saying anything worth listening to. 🤓
Very well put!
And how would you know, if she doesn't get the chance to speak? This is Knowles' basic tactic in any debate: shout down the opponents, interrupt them, don't give them a chance to make their points. If they did, his lies would be exposed. If it's a quietly spoken woman, all the better. For this kind of man, beating down a woman, verbally or physically, just feels so dang good!
@@cliffordbernard7663 Did you hear her rant? It was based on "structural racism"... What is that? So you feel women are inferior to men? "For this kind of man, beating down a woman, verbally or physically, just feels so dang good!" implies women are weak... If he had not talked over her he would never been allowed to answer because hers was a speech not a debate...
@@cliffordbernard7663 Clifford. Just stop. You are making yourself sound like a complete dunce.
@@connernoyes4579 You make me laugh Connor. You've got no idea have you? I'm guessing you're a MAGA hat wearer.
What a sad life this teacher has and passing it on to her student's
She a good looking woman, but she would be impossible to live with.
“You’re using statistics for your own political agenda”
Name one person who’s used statistics to help an opposing political agenda lol
statistics are for what now? lol
His point was that his statistics were not from an authoritative and relatively neutral source (like the federal bureaus for justice and immigration) unlike some academic journal of new age feelings
@@cliffordbernard7663 That's literally just a lie. You're complaining about him not citing his sources and yet you proceed to not only do the exact same thing, but bluntly lie about it since what he's said in this video is absolutely true and backed up by the statistics given by actual credible entities.
_"Violence isn't a subjective feeling - its an objective fact"_
Its mad that we live in a world where such a blatant and obvious observation is worthy of applause
This "professor" is out of her mind.
I’m Mexican and everything that lady said is wrong. I dress like a respectable man and I have no problems with cops or anyone else.
If you notice, it’s always someone fishbelly white who says white people are the r-word and systemically the r-word.
A cat doesn’t approve of most professors.
😂😂😂
No one does.
Teacher and professors are the highest propagandized group in the world. Kinda scary that they teach yet are so easily fooled
@@XxTR1D A cat agrees.
Ser Pounce?
When you employ people to tick a box, this is what you get! ☕️
Violence-behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
Their entire argument is weak and nonsensical, it only works in a closed classroom setting where they can belittle those who oppose them.
Her teacher license must be revoked.
"I've been to Art School for 8 years..." This explains A Great Deal of her "thinking". So much of Art is tied up in Emotions/Feelings.
'Facts don't care about your Feelings" Ben Shapiro (fast talking Jew)
fast talking jew lmao
@@ryushev2000
:-)
He talks wayyy to fast !! Lol
@hello bruh
:-)
Hearing angry truthful words is no comparison to believing lies.
He ripped into shreds. Good god that was brutal. I'm in shock.
She was going to cry after everyone clapped
Careful where you look up words on the internet...dictionaries themselves are becoming woke and changing definitions on the fly now...
Indeed, that was one of the instructions in their manual 1984.
Oh bless this child. Better to remain a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Mike 🤣 good job. Leftist tears for my morning coffee.
Exactly !!!
This guy gets his kicks beating down woman in public, He's a creep.
She actually said that she’s been in art school for 8 years. And i simply cannot *IMAGINE* the oppression she’s witnessed during that time 🤦🏻♂️
perpetrated in that time, more likely
🤣
Well i looked up violence and this is the definition - behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone.
I'm British and Embarresed that we are represented by this type of woman . Blinkered , attention seeking, ignoring the facts and hunting for a cause to improve their own self worth. Keep up the good work Michael Knowles!
Well played, Mike. However, I really need to stop watching this stuff in the morning. Causes me to start drinking way to early when I see the state of things.
I feel like for ever dumb discouraging thing we see on the internet there are a lot more encouraging things we never see online cause they don’t get clicks. Gotta be a huge discretion
That teacher should be jailed!!!
My favorite destruction of a prof! 👏👏👏.... 🤣 atta boy Michael!
Liberal professors: welp, guess we have to redefine "violence "
Wow, did he make a fool out of her. How utterly embarrassed she must've felt. She should've kept her mouth shut, and quit while she was ahead. I wouldn't want her teaching in any college .
When he presents criminal justice statistics as proof, she dismisses him since he interpreted them his own way.
There's another clip doing the rounds of her butting into a conversation before she went into this talk. She came across as a complete numb nuts outside the hall and proved it with what she's saying now.
I'm looking for it now. Comedy
Those who hate the truth. Hate those who speak the truth. He is speaking the truth
I am so glad to hear the crowd applaud logic vs the soft professors feelings
She should not be a teacher
We are so doomed with people like her teaching our kids.
I would bet that teacher hasn't had a relationship with a person in YEARS. She is SO out of touch and uptight.
She's actually the exact type of woman that men like to date or even marry: dumb and easy to manipulate.
Who in their right mind would date that liberal lunatic? She hates whites but I guarantee she has dated them.
No way dude, she’s cute and has a big heart, those are 2 great traits. It’s ok to disagree politically, there’s a lot more to life
Great Smack Down MK.
Never underestimate the stupidity of the person standing next you...
What a wealth of knowledge she must have accumulated in all of her years. She doesn't look old enough to have finished school yet and she has never experienced anything outside of academia. And, as if to prove my point, she tells us that she supports her students point of view. Shouldn't she be the one that is guiding the students? But there gain, she did have to clarify that she is an art teacher. An art teacher is someone that isn't good enough to make a living as an artist.
This “professor “ needs to be deported.
She can’t speak a sentence without shaking and stumbling her words. Truly the sign of someone using logic and sense.
Ben Shapiro and Michael Knowles released their videos at the same time, are they having a competition? Let's see who wins.
I noticed that too lol
MK is much more entertaining and interesting than Ben! Nothing against Ben…Michael’s voice is easier to listen to as well!
@@timhazelwood8063 for some, Shapiro is easier to listen to if you slow him down a bit.
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/pIIBxhAfMzc/v-deo.html
I watched Michael from time to time but now I have so much respects for him to stand up and talk to that woke teacher as it is. That was epic. Another foreigner coming to America and spreading more hate and divisiveness.
You respect bullies? You respect liars? Because that's all I saw on display here: aggressive bullying tactics, and lies. Knowles is a bully boy who gets his kicks beating women down.
That professor is an absolute dunce.
If speech is violence, then everyone in the youtube comment section would have felony's of assault on their record.
Alot of people speaking in this comments section. It's getting awfully violent in here. We better all just shut up. Lol
Oooh Michael Brutal and amazing! You’re killing it softly.
I can’t believe she teaches!!!! That’s scary to me
She nervously looks around for help. These people are not used to being challenged much less hearing opposing arguments. Living in an echo chamber produces idiocy. Well done Michael. These are great.