I have a Tribute and love it. Compared to the expensive Les Paul Standard the Tribute is a no frills version Les Paul. When you get a Tribute you are not getting and gloss top, fancy wood grain top, binding, etc. What you do get is a nice, heavy, Les Paul with a fantastic satin finish neck and the pickups are great for rock. It plays so nice and since everything on it is a satin finish, you don't stick to any of it. It just plays so nice and sounds to great. Its a stripped down rock machine and IMO well worth the money. I would like to have a Les Paul Standard or Classic one day, but for now I'm having too much fun gigging with my Tribute. Great video and playing. Thanks for posting.
They both look cool. As long as it's sturdy and the electronics are good it doesn't gotta be expensive. I had a great Cleca brand (discontinued, I think) LP replica that I progressed my skills on as a teen but eventually the input jack failed and i donated it to my friend's kids
Killer playing dude..i just found your channel and subscribed..have you ever played any of the Lite gibson lespauls..i have a 2020 gibson lespaul classic lite and love it...i know every so often they release diff versions of it limited here and there.
Nice axes brother. I my opinion, the tribute sounded better dirty but not by much. The standard sounds much better clean, but I hardly use much of that clean stuff they speak of, lol. Nice vid
Some ferocious playing in tone at the end there. Some really thick fat sound coming from that thing. Honestly I don't like either guitar. But the sound was great
Whoa the Tribute was surprisingly good on the distorted tones. Usually the 60s kills everything on hugh gain, but this time it wasn't really above. The Tribute sounded kind of like an SG, which is a good thing, because it just had a hint of the SG top end while maintaining the bottom end of a Les Paul. 60s looks incredible though. Beautiful guitar. Was better on the cleans and can be made to sound better with higher gain than it sounded here. Also has more of a 80s hair metal sound. Where i think the 60s gets slammed is on the Classic hard rock type tones. Usually, the 50s, Studio and even the Tribute had more of the classic hard rock sound, clarity, warmth.
You set the sound up really good here
Both sounded great to me. Tribute rocked
I have a Tribute and love it. Compared to the expensive Les Paul Standard the Tribute is a no frills version Les Paul. When you get a Tribute you are not getting and gloss top, fancy wood grain top, binding, etc. What you do get is a nice, heavy, Les Paul with a fantastic satin finish neck and the pickups are great for rock. It plays so nice and since everything on it is a satin finish, you don't stick to any of it. It just plays so nice and sounds to great. Its a stripped down rock machine and IMO well worth the money. I would like to have a Les Paul Standard or Classic one day, but for now I'm having too much fun gigging with my Tribute. Great video and playing. Thanks for posting.
They both look cool. As long as it's sturdy and the electronics are good it doesn't gotta be expensive. I had a great Cleca brand (discontinued, I think) LP replica that I progressed my skills on as a teen but eventually the input jack failed and i donated it to my friend's kids
Killer playing dude..i just found your channel and subscribed..have you ever played any of the Lite gibson lespauls..i have a 2020 gibson lespaul classic lite and love it...i know every so often they release diff versions of it limited here and there.
@billygwalthney369 thanks so much! I have never played one of those but they definitely look awesome
@@timjenkins502 everyone that picks it up can't believe how lite it is but it feels n plays like a reg LP.
Nice axes brother. I my opinion, the tribute sounded better dirty but not by much. The standard sounds much better clean, but I hardly use much of that clean stuff they speak of, lol. Nice vid
Sign me up for the 1300 dollar USA Gibson Tribute any day.
Some ferocious playing in tone at the end there. Some really thick fat sound coming from that thing. Honestly I don't like either guitar. But the sound was great
TRIBUTE FOR ME
Whoa the Tribute was surprisingly good on the distorted tones. Usually the 60s kills everything on hugh gain, but this time it wasn't really above. The Tribute sounded kind of like an SG, which is a good thing, because it just had a hint of the SG top end while maintaining the bottom end of a Les Paul.
60s looks incredible though. Beautiful guitar. Was better on the cleans and can be made to sound better with higher gain than it sounded here. Also has more of a 80s hair metal sound.
Where i think the 60s gets slammed is on the Classic hard rock type tones. Usually, the 50s, Studio and even the Tribute had more of the classic hard rock sound, clarity, warmth.