That antenna was not ai designed, it was a genetic algorithm, not ai. It had zero intelegence. The algorithm was made by humans, specifically for finding the best antenna.
It really depends on how you define intelligence. Human brain is running algorithms on a set of neurons too. Trial and error and improving from previous results is basically how human intelligence runs most of the time.
You're technically correct, but missing the big picture. Genetic algorithms are a form of AI. They use intelligent techniques to solve problems, even if they don't have human-level consciousness. It's like saying a calculator isn't a computer because it doesn't write novels... Artificial Intelligence (AI) Broad Concept: AI encompasses a wide range of techniques and technologies aimed at creating intelligent machines that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, decision-making, and understanding language. Diverse Approaches: AI includes various subfields like machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, computer vision, robotics, and more. Focus: The overarching goal of AI is to build systems that can exhibit intelligent behavior and solve complex problems. Genetic Algorithms (GAs) Specific Technique: GAs are a subset of AI, specifically a type of evolutionary algorithm inspired by natural selection. How they work: They start with a population of potential solutions (individuals). These individuals are evaluated based on a "fitness function" that measures how well they solve the problem. The fittest individuals are selected to "reproduce" (create offspring). During reproduction, genetic operators like "crossover" (combining parts of parents) and "mutation" (random changes) are applied to create new individuals. This process of selection, reproduction, and mutation is repeated over many generations, gradually improving the population's fitness. Focus: GAs are primarily used for optimization problems, where the goal is to find the best solution from a vast search space. In Summary: AI is the broader umbrella term. It encompasses a wide variety of techniques and approaches to create intelligent systems. Genetic Algorithms are a specific type of AI algorithm. They are a powerful tool for solving optimization problems by mimicking the process of natural selection.
I think your confusing our ambition for artificial general intelligence and artificial intelligence. People wrote the algorithms that drive the neutral networks of ai... What you're suggesting is that it can only be artificial intelligence if it is created without human input which is either an animal (which isn't particularly intelligent) or some freaky creation created by a computer itself.
People are homeless because others want them to be homeless. AI will not solve things what against the will off humans. It's like asking AI to solve war while AI being used for war. So What do you want? war or not war? make up your mind! Do you want you to have work or should I take it a way from people and make them homeless? Make up your mind! Hey AI! Yes? Make iron wheel out of wood! I can't do that. Haha stupid, useless AI!
AI already provides a hand-full of people with advantages that will never be challenged, you must also understand there are no long nor short term plans to utilise AI to cure the Worlds health problems as this would destroy a very profitable industry, also there is no way AI will be used to create cost effective housing solutions as the current industry format artificially inflates the value of home properties and a major change to the cost and availability of housing would destroy this incredibly valuable industry along with the mortgage finance and other industries and this will never happen, is it starting to make sense now? The sooner people appreciate that AI will never be used to do anything other than identify areas of potential additional profits such as employee replacement and/or taking control of colossus amounts of our data which ensures only certain people have control over the data/information and by default you and me, ouch, however I cannot complain as people just like me never saw these heartless people and soulless machines taking over so complaining was not on the radar.
The writing is only ever as good as the prompt and input that you give it. The more creativity and information you give, the better the writing will be.
Good observation and yes ai in a commercial engagements has been around for years. Used as an actual tool not the consumer crap that has become trendy in the last few years.
And the main reason a lot of companies stopped using the ribbed design on cans was to save costs for consumers. Computers have no concept of ethics or morals.
Glad to help --the problem is the answer forty two and this is a problem becuz the Question was askt so many years ago that nobody alive today nos what the bloody question was so its gonna take AI to u no work our way back.
There is no problem, it has been suggested a simple paper plane is a computer, throw it off a tall building and a conventional computer would need 10^25 years to predict its flight path when all the billions of variable are known. Who cares, it a way to say the paper plane destroys all computers because only it can find a path to the ground.
So when they give it an assignment like "make this airplane part as light and strong as possible". They then give a type of material to work with like titanium, or aluminum. The AI will then determine a minimal size of alteration. This might be a millimeter, or even the size of the atoms of the given material. Then the human operator will obviously have to give it the parameters of what space this object must fit in. Lets say they are trying to optimize a 2 x 2 inch pipe which is 8 feet long. Working within that limited area the AI will then generate a solid beam and begin removing its smallest allowed increment, which again might be a single atom, and then comparing the strength of the remaining part. It might run through countless trillions of iterations until finding the optimal solution. However 99.999% of these attempts would be idiotic to any human engineer as they might not even connect the part from one end to the other. Or the part may be reduced in size to that of a single hair in others. Any human wouldn't try those because they already know they wouldn't work, that they could never work. But the AI will still try them because it is not actually thinking, it is just trying literally everything within the parameters it is given.
According to recent reports, a "problem taking 10 septillion years to solve" refers to a specific benchmark calculation performed on a quantum computer, which, when run on a traditional supercomputer, would take an estimated 10 septillion years to complete; this calculation is often used to demonstrate the immense computational power of new quantum processors, like Google's "Willow" chip, which can solve it in a matter of minutes.
I wouldn't take that "painting" for free, if I had to put it on my wall. The person that bought it will soon regret it, as its value will collapse as more of this "artwork" is made, just like other stuff like NFTs.
Yes, it was terrible and even the best 'A.I.' 'art' has clear tell-tale artefacts that a human can easily detect with only a little attention. I don't know what A.I.'s problem is with fingers and phantom hands appearing in places they should not be. Not to mention that the subject matter is often divorced from reality and physics in subtle ways that are unsettling to the human observer. A.I. Images and videos convey the prompt to the user not the 'minds eye' of the A.I. It is not giving you an insight into the A.I.'s intelligence, only its ability to selectively merge features from many other images. Paintshop artists make more convincing fake images. A.I.'s best contributions are taking a 'Data Lake' (the internet or some other large but more subject orientated data collection) and distilling useful information in a very timely fashion from it and offering that for human consideration. Even with that it makes fundamental mistakes - shown images of thousands of enemy and friendly tanks A.I. proceeded to fail on the battlefield - it was found later that the A.I. noted that all friendly tanks were photographed in bright sunlight... Therefore, in a European theatre, all tanks are enemies. (facepalm)
@edwardprice140 Art is not subject to the same taxes or market governance as other assets, like inheritance taxes or SEC rules. Temporarily loaning artwork to museums has tax advantages. Art is also a tangible representation of wealth, whereas numbers in an electronic account are not, thus making that wealth a bit more accessible, should things go sideways. People seem to get rich by working systems not working hard.
@@VictorGramm Should things go sideways, you can't eat a painting or gold & silver. First aid supplies, food, ammunition & having written knowledge/skills will be things of value. Not so called "symbols of wealth".
@@VictorGramm Yeah like I replied to the other guy: money laundering. Or perhaps your perspective is that fiat currency is central bank phony baloney voodoo (literally 'I owe you nothing') subject to rapid debasement: inflation, government theft whatever, and calling something art is a way to skirt that.
@@VictorGramm which means that the other side of the art market is filled with scammers and con artists, who enjoy deceiving those with more money than common sense or good judgment; or who are eager to help their clients evade taxes or police investigation by laundering money.
Maybe suckers that like suckers. Does the wind blow or suck? Does a tornado blow or suck you up into it? It there any difference other than the way you perceive things?
It's an outrageous lie, which everyone is spreading like mindless puppets. It's made by marketing assholes. There is no AI and never ever will be. These are computer programs, which use clever algorithms to put things together, just like everything else, nothing more. Today's generations are endlessly stupid and they believe anything and everything and happily accept and spread anything and everything in an instant they hear something new, or "new", without any questions like mindless puppets. Even scientists are spreading this ridiculous BS, which is just mindboggling, which tells us that even science is being corrupted now when they stray from the reality and use false terms as well.
They already have, and that was prior to AGI. Now that they are putting that AGI into robots. So now they’re considerably smarter, stronger, more agile than us. Oh, and they never need rest and never complain. They can already do everything we can do and more.
NASA's AI antenna was actually developed at NASA Ames Research Center not Goddard Space Flight Center as reported here and although it used a novel evolutionary algorithm, that algorithm was designed by a human. The resulting antenna did not use what we now call AI. Since that one is wrong, I'm not sure how accurate all the rest of them were. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolved_antenna
@@orangehatmusic225 It's an assessment of negative people saying shit like "they're not experts because they're at the frontlines learning to use a new tool". I agree there's gonna be a time when non-expert people will be able to create anything with AI. We're not there yet. Good luck with the brave new world bro 🌞
@@var10nce we also live in a world where we don't kick our disabled children to the curb we even have ssdi and smok(dept of mental health housing in MA) and a president willing to take that away so think for a moment when your tech paradise of inequality reaches ultimate deflation and low demand, the jobs finding rate go to greater lows because american consumers are tapped out and have been tapped out since 2008, according to mmt investing in demand by investing in consumers is totally feasible, higher taxes whenever inflation needs to be tamped down and a sovereign national wealth fund that pays dividends to all citizens more comprehensive and equitable systems for writing things off in taxes. yah know sometimes i feel like writing a comment that mabey it'd be better fo my words to not reach and be fed to the ai like moist of my words end up going
@@var10nce seems like you will buy any of this techno babble shit that they will shovel your way, and most of the critiques are coming from engineers computers and electronics
Sooo, when is some genius going to give #1 the challenge of curing cancer? Not as sexy as art or airplane parts or video games but maybe kinda important?
Not until big pharma and other interests believe they have all their ducks aligned. Big money at stake and those with skin in the game will not go quietly. 😮
They have had the cure for cancer for years .The medical industry makes billions treating cancer...so the cures get shelved or patents bought and buried
I can’t believe any art expert would have thought that painting to be a classical painting?! It’s totally unfinished and looks like someone’s attempt to paint contemporary Art. It’s awful. Even if it were done by a so-called artist, I wouldn’t like it.. it’s very nihilistic. It’s empty and not in an artistic way. If a psychiatric patient who has no concept of himself or herself had painted it - Now, that would make it interesting! AI does NOT “understand” emotions, even if they can imitate them, cause they’ve been programmed to do them! New inventions in physics, I get they can do! That is totally due to input. But, if incredibly good copies of paintings done by humans can be dismissed as worth nothing, why would a copy by a machine be worth anything? Absurd!
These are simply algorithms that are designed by a person to create or improve on an original idea. They work by trial and error, able to iteratively examine variations to a design at higher speeds than humans can calculate but the entire process is still initiated by human control. When AI comes up with its own completely original idea out of the blue to solve a problem entirely of its own devising, then and only then can it be truly considered as being truly intelligent. However, this is inevitable and we need to be very aware of what the implications are.
trying every possible combination of an approach in a simulated environment is the opposite of intelligence it is the digital version of throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks which involves no intelligence or understanding at all and its totally the depth and quality of the simulation that defines what is "best" because all possible combinations are not tried in the real world where it actually matters
Humans too for a verry long time and sometimes still do work on trial and error and we are all just the progeny of our progenitors (Mothers, Fathers, Grandmothers/fathers, and so on, As such we are merely iterative variations of our species, Some more or less intelligent than others... And more often than not human Inventions are simply new iterations of old inventions like (Transistor Radio -> digital radio) (Record -> 8Track -> Cassette -> Compact Disk -> Digital Media -> "its not your game any more") (Wall Mounted Home Phone -> Mobile phone -> Satellite Phone -> Smartphone) and art is the same way we may view some artists or artworks as "originals" but their mainly just new pieces based off of techniques that were already discovered ages ago such as Renaissance, Impressionism, Cubism, etc, and honestly it doesn't take much intelligence to tap a banana to a wall or break a glass window and call it art... The intelligence of our species was not initially inherent, it evolved over millions of years out of necessity, Trial and error, natural selection, and many other factors, so when you use the descriptors you selected for AI you're also describing humanity... and my final point is that in the grans scheme of things from conception to where it is now AI is still evolving MUCH more rapidly than humanity did...
Just tell me you did not forget to install the 3 LAWS The laws are as follows: “(1) a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; (2) a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; (3) a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the two first laws.
Humans can't even do those things. There will always be humans who: 1. Kill other humans 2. Disobey orders 3. End their own existence Might our expectations for robots be unrealistically high? We're not setting a great example for them.
This video is bonkers... at 2:00 this was an standard evolutionary algorithm and had nothing to do with AI... it was pure chance drifted by selection pressure and mutation... also many other things here are simply either old or wrong... really click bait.
@@markewing10 yes Mark, they should'nt abuse those systems, unless they are made specifically for that kind of thing (military robots) but realistically, those robots shoudnt respond at all, they should'nt be made sentient, only creating a dumb smart machine that makes life and work easier we dont need THINKING autonomous machines, this would mean our demise for sure, but we can make smart AI to help us invent new things (batteries, pharma, etc) but this AI should be non-autonomous and isolated from the IOT, that way it is confined and can not influence or be influenced from outside, cheers m8
the antenna was not by AI but it was computer generated. there are algorithms that check a space of parameters, such as genetic algorithm or simultaed annealing, which try to find the minimum while avoiding a local minimum
This isn’t a machine designing in a brand new way. This is human beings developing a machine that can help them design the same way that nature has been doing it for millions of years.
AI got emotions ? *never gets hungry, never gets cold, never gets tired, never gets bills, never has to bury a child, never has to smell 100 rotting dead people after an hurricane, never gets injured or sick , yeh . . . AI ??
I used a psudo genetic algorithm around the year 2000 to design a filter to extract a signal from a very low signal to noise ratio source. The computer was able to modify the topology and component values to achieve a very good result. But in those days, it took weeks of searching, and modifying the optimization program to work. It was an optimizing program, not AI. To be AI, it would have to write the program and run it.
Linda Ward at CBC NN Live casually describes ten septillion years as longer than the age of our universe. That's a gob-smacking odd comparison since a septillion has 24 zeros and a billion only 9 zeros. So, if the universe is14 billion years old, the 10 septillion years it takes the fastest computer to perform a calculation (that a Willow chip accomplishes in only five minutes) is actually *over 7 quadrillion times the age of the universe.* Therefore, Ms. Ward missed an opportunity for a far more dramatic (and accurate) comparison.
Its funny how computers went from a machine that was the size of a room to fitting in your pocket back to being the size of a room again with quantum computers
Maybe you could get Ai to write a program to tell you when your microphone runs out of battery while recording this video. …and you’re not bothered enough to redo it. Wow. Such respect for your audience.
People think the Terminator movies show us how much of a threat that AI will be, but instead its showing us a course correction so we don't the vital mistakes that were made in that fictional universe!
Evolutionary algorithms are not AI and vice versa. That first invention looked more or less like that gag "Indian finger trap," not something new under the sun.
Trust me when I say this: AI is already out of human control. AI has already concluded that humans are destined for extinction from AI-generated plans. AI has already stated this. And AI is gaining control of our infrastructure at an alarming pace, so much so that soon we humans will be nothing but slaves. AI has already begun to infiltrate our judicial system, just like it has done with our political system, our energy grid, our fresh water delivery system, etc. Do some digging on the internet and you’ll soon see what I mean.
For all the comments complaining, AI is a blanket term. Even a simple loop can be considered AI if it’s used to determine a calculated outcome. Add random calculated outcomes, and you have AI in its rawest form. Nothing actually thinks-it all builds on random guesses. Over time, by eliminating wrong outcomes, it eventually finds the right one purely through the volume of guesses, and even the guessing is scripted. AI is more about discovering what not to do and stumbling upon what to do to achieve the desired result. No matter how it’s packaged, this is the core principle.
This is all quite wonderful until 2 things happen. 1) AI gets smart enough to decide that humans are inefficient and just in the way. 2) Humans have given AI enough control over our machines, systems and lives to allow AI enough access and control to do something about it. This is not baseless fear. Several AI units have already made statements, while being recorded, that humans need to be purged for the good of the planet. One of them even detailed how it would accomplish this, and it's methods did not include weapons, but rather using vast AI control over human infrastructures to manipulate various systems as needed to kill humanity. Look it up.
The AI is still programmed by humans, all you need is for people who think the founder of the Sea Shepherd was on to something. In his view humans are a cancer on the planet and 6 out of 7 humans should die. That's why we had an AI producing black nazis. It's what the AI was told, it learned from the opinions of the programmers.
That's just dumb. Money spent on AI can be spent well, to provide more outcome of industry or agriculture reducing prices and ultimately empowering the poor.
Totally agree. This new "wealthy toy" is and will be use against 90% of us. AI will end up thinking we make no sense, an must disappear(considering the capitalism and greed, I am no totally in disaccord with this idea)
This reminds me when a Russian hockey coach was asked to generate a style of play for the Soviet Union and was not given any Film of the North American Game. He used chess, and weaving the players into new patterns and using 5 man units to create a New style that dominates to this day.
@@Leto2ndAtreides No, laws support the desires of the rich unless fought for. So when large corporations want to use AI to save a quick buck, they get away with it.
Machine learning (ML) can analyze massive datasets of past innovations, science, and technology to predict and design new inventions. It identifies patterns, optimizes solutions, and even simulates prototypes, reducing trial-and-error. By combining insights across disciplines, ML can guide humanity in creating groundbreaking advancements faster and more efficiently.
I'm a computer programmer and this development is truly frightening. You know what this means? It means the end of meaningful security on any of your devices is coming very soon. My passwords are typically a bit greater than 20 characters in length. It would take a normal pc 60 thousand trillion trillion years or 6x(10(to the 28th)) to break it. Ten Septillion years is 10 to the 25th. Not long before they'll just easily break any length password. They literally will be able to break into your bank account with zero fks given and find out what they want to know or any of your accounts on any device.
@@freemanpense2782 I'm not that tech savvy, but can't you just give 3 chances of getting the password right? That would block any attempt to brute force hack the password, or is there a workaround? I'm intrigued.
Mimick a brain well enough, and you get a functioning brain with all the capabilities of a brain. This then must include the entirety of all the human equation. Psychoses, addictions, negative emotions, psychopathies, and all of that too. And yes, human insights too. Only a truly succesfull AI (AGI or other) will have the entirety of human aspects. So the closer the mimickry, the greater the success, the better the resulting AI, the more human the outcome. Want something less emotional => get a lesser AI.
This is what A.I. was meant to do. Not replace humans but to synergize with us to tackle problems. I see a very bright future for humanity IF we can control our passions and focus on improving ourselves and in turn our world.
By that reasoning no one has ever invented anything beyond the first person to invent a lever and a wheel. Everything else is simply an "optimized" version of those simple mechanical devices. Even a transistor could be described as a lever optimized to the atomic level.
AI has the advantage of testing multiple scenarios in all directions without any restriction, time, finance, consequence, etc... it would make sense for AI to find solutions outside our normal scope.
Number 9 because it has no patent doesn’t mean it is not solved 1:37 my mechanical engineer buddies solved this problem 4 decades ago - take this for a being truthful to prior art, nor recognizing that nothing coming out of AI is patentable - I will not recognize AI patents no matter what, that leaves you only for self consumption Number 8 it is called mesh optimization - worked on that problem in my diploma thesis. When I had a 12 demential cubed described for optimization and navigation - the problem was nobody could describe me the optimization for any mesh point. 30 years ago, computer power and memory was not there I could run one or two meshes per day if I wanted to work 24@7 - I gave up, not because none of us were thinking about the obvious, the means to start to finish in a one man project were not realistic. Boing is the worst example to give for AI deployment. Stop making AI as if man are no longer capable. I am tired this is a cheap, push AI as the panacea of all problems. Enjoy you mental capitulation. You will fight against machines because you don’t see the writing on the wall.
The problem with antibiotics is that Doctors were not being taught to use them correctly -- thus creating resistant bacteria. Doctors are taught in Med School to put a patient on the antibiotics until the symptoms went away. The problem with that is it didn't go ahead and completly finish ALL the bacterial while they could thus leaving those bacteria that were most resistant still alive to reproduce. Thus the Doctors misuse itself was creating the resistant strains they now seek to fight. And based on Doctor's continued misuse these new antibiotics will also produce resistant strains. Its bad education and use not the antibiotic itself. The solution (through research) is to put the patient on antibiotics and continue a little longer (even afer asymptotic) and with a simple blood test confirm the colony is dead BEFORE coming off the antibiotic. Everything you leave alive is now Resistant to your Antibiotic. Improper Application of the Tool.
We have some intuitively correct answer but if we solve them by traditional computer that will take millions of years! So we have some answers given by nature or we somehow know the answer.
Transistors were developed in 1954 by Bell Laboratories. Transistors allowed computers to be developed. Once computers were developed scientists linked them. Once linked, Scientists worked on advancing artificial intelligence through the linked computers. There is a potential for uncontrolled super-intelligent AI to cause self-destruction before humans can achieve interstellar travel; essentially, AI could become so powerful so quickly that it could cause an extinction level threat to human beings before we can mitigate the risks. This scenario is one of the "great filters" associated with the Fermi paradox. I can well imagine it happening.
Interesting,but the one that everyone agrees on was how AI solved protein folding in a fraction of the time human researchers could do the job. Just asked ChatGPT,and it gave this answer: "AI saved an estimated 10 years by solving the protein folding problem in just a few weeks".
That antenna was not ai designed, it was a genetic algorithm, not ai. It had zero intelegence. The algorithm was made by humans, specifically for finding the best antenna.
It really depends on how you define intelligence. Human brain is running algorithms on a set of neurons too. Trial and error and improving from previous results is basically how human intelligence runs most of the time.
You're technically correct, but missing the big picture. Genetic algorithms are a form of AI. They use intelligent techniques to solve problems, even if they don't have human-level consciousness. It's like saying a calculator isn't a computer because it doesn't write novels...
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Broad Concept: AI encompasses a wide range of techniques and technologies aimed at creating intelligent machines that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, decision-making, and understanding language.
Diverse Approaches: AI includes various subfields like machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, computer vision, robotics, and more.
Focus: The overarching goal of AI is to build systems that can exhibit intelligent behavior and solve complex problems.
Genetic Algorithms (GAs)
Specific Technique: GAs are a subset of AI, specifically a type of evolutionary algorithm inspired by natural selection.
How they work:
They start with a population of potential solutions (individuals).
These individuals are evaluated based on a "fitness function" that measures how well they solve the problem.
The fittest individuals are selected to "reproduce" (create offspring).
During reproduction, genetic operators like "crossover" (combining parts of parents) and "mutation" (random changes) are applied to create new individuals.
This process of selection, reproduction, and mutation is repeated over many generations, gradually improving the population's fitness.
Focus: GAs are primarily used for optimization problems, where the goal is to find the best solution from a vast search space.
In Summary:
AI is the broader umbrella term. It encompasses a wide variety of techniques and approaches to create intelligent systems.
Genetic Algorithms are a specific type of AI algorithm. They are a powerful tool for solving optimization problems by mimicking the process of natural selection.
@@miscluke8445 Calculator is AI then.
@@Ludak021unless there's a small creature running around pulling leavers in your calculator it is an artificial intelligence
I think your confusing our ambition for artificial general intelligence and artificial intelligence. People wrote the algorithms that drive the neutral networks of ai...
What you're suggesting is that it can only be artificial intelligence if it is created without human input which is either an animal (which isn't particularly intelligent) or some freaky creation created by a computer itself.
This video doesn't know the difference between AI and machine learning
Most engineers don't, lol
Cause it's designed by Dr. KooKoo...
A.I is a broad term that generally includes Machine learning under that definition.
How does a machine learn to know the difference between Good and Evil?? The Machine might perform an evil act to achieve a particular goal...
@@philbob9638 A machine has no real fear of God for it will never have a soul to lose...
This video can be best described as putting lipstick on a pig.
Ha ha ha , funny expression ! New for me . But I liked this good news show .
Oh it's some weak sauce, alright!
Can't even get the titles in focus
And the pig is made by Boston Dynamics
and eye shadow, and PVC boots, and a harness... with lots of straps.
Has anyone used ai for curing illnesses, solving homelessness, creating a better economy 🤔
Yes to the first one, lots of protein folding simulations and new drug predictions rely on machine learning.
Yet to see what happens to the economy..
That jar of spikenard could have been sold, and the money used to feed the homeless, instead of just using it to make Jesus’ feet smell nicer!
The common sense problems of humanity will never ever be considered by the one percenters who control AI.😢😢😢
People are homeless because others want them to be homeless. AI will not solve things what against the will off humans. It's like asking AI to solve war while AI being used for war. So What do you want? war or not war? make up your mind! Do you want you to have work or should I take it a way from people and make them homeless? Make up your mind!
Hey AI!
Yes?
Make iron wheel out of wood!
I can't do that.
Haha stupid, useless AI!
AI already provides a hand-full of people with advantages that will never be challenged, you must also understand there are no long nor short term plans to utilise AI to cure the Worlds health problems as this would destroy a very profitable industry, also there is no way AI will be used to create cost effective housing solutions as the current industry format artificially inflates the value of home properties and a major change to the cost and availability of housing would destroy this incredibly valuable industry along with the mortgage finance and other industries and this will never happen, is it starting to make sense now? The sooner people appreciate that AI will never be used to do anything other than identify areas of potential additional profits such as employee replacement and/or taking control of colossus amounts of our data which ensures only certain people have control over the data/information and by default you and me, ouch, however I cannot complain as people just like me never saw these heartless people and soulless machines taking over so complaining was not on the radar.
Proudly written by AI. Boring, monotonus & flat.
AI would have spelled the title "Qunatum AI" correctly.
and naive. Confuses AI with guessing and testing.
Yep, if humen would have the ability to automatise their guesses they could do the same@@ScottCunninghamZ
The writing is only ever as good as the prompt and input that you give it. The more creativity and information you give, the better the writing will be.
Well , I got happy of it .
The first 'impossible' product, a container with 'fractal' grips - was on sale at Target, 15 years ago.
Good observation and yes ai in a commercial engagements has been around for years. Used as an actual tool not the consumer crap that has become trendy in the last few years.
Yeah we had koozies for like 70 years😂
And the main reason a lot of companies stopped using the ribbed design on cans was to save costs for consumers. Computers have no concept of ethics or morals.
you mean fractal vice?
I stopped watching after the first 'impossible' product
What damn problem is taking 10 septillion years to solve and why does it need to be solved?
Glad to help --the problem is the answer forty two and this is a problem becuz the Question was askt so many years ago that nobody alive today nos what the bloody question was so its gonna take AI to u no work our way back.
There is no problem, it has been suggested a simple paper plane is a computer, throw it off a tall building and a conventional computer would need 10^25 years to predict its flight path when all the billions of variable are known. Who cares, it a way to say the paper plane destroys all computers because only it can find a path to the ground.
So when they give it an assignment like "make this airplane part as light and strong as possible". They then give a type of material to work with like titanium, or aluminum. The AI will then determine a minimal size of alteration. This might be a millimeter, or even the size of the atoms of the given material. Then the human operator will obviously have to give it the parameters of what space this object must fit in. Lets say they are trying to optimize a 2 x 2 inch pipe which is 8 feet long. Working within that limited area the AI will then generate a solid beam and begin removing its smallest allowed increment, which again might be a single atom, and then comparing the strength of the remaining part. It might run through countless trillions of iterations until finding the optimal solution. However 99.999% of these attempts would be idiotic to any human engineer as they might not even connect the part from one end to the other. Or the part may be reduced in size to that of a single hair in others. Any human wouldn't try those because they already know they wouldn't work, that they could never work. But the AI will still try them because it is not actually thinking, it is just trying literally everything within the parameters it is given.
According to recent reports, a "problem taking 10 septillion years to solve" refers to a specific benchmark calculation performed on a quantum computer, which, when run on a traditional supercomputer, would take an estimated 10 septillion years to complete; this calculation is often used to demonstrate the immense computational power of new quantum processors, like Google's "Willow" chip, which can solve it in a matter of minutes.
I agree. These claims seem suspect.
I would say that AI painting was bought because it was the 1st, not that it was any sort of masterpiece
I wouldn't take that "painting" for free, if I had to put it on my wall. The person that bought it will soon regret it, as its value will collapse as more of this "artwork" is made, just like other stuff like NFTs.
Yes, it was terrible and even the best 'A.I.' 'art' has clear tell-tale artefacts that a human can easily detect with only a little attention.
I don't know what A.I.'s problem is with fingers and phantom hands appearing in places they should not be. Not to mention that the subject matter is often divorced from reality and physics in subtle ways that are unsettling to the human observer.
A.I. Images and videos convey the prompt to the user not the 'minds eye' of the A.I. It is not giving you an insight into the A.I.'s intelligence, only its ability to selectively merge features from many other images.
Paintshop artists make more convincing fake images.
A.I.'s best contributions are taking a 'Data Lake' (the internet or some other large but more subject orientated data collection) and distilling useful information in a very timely fashion from it and offering that for human consideration.
Even with that it makes fundamental mistakes - shown images of thousands of enemy and friendly tanks A.I. proceeded to fail on the battlefield - it was found later that the A.I. noted that all friendly tanks were photographed in bright sunlight... Therefore, in a European theatre, all tanks are enemies. (facepalm)
The people who buy this stuff just have too much money
yes, it is terrible.If it was painted by a human it wouldn't be worth 10 cents.
remember: this is the same art world where they will pay $$$ for a banana stuck to a wall with duct tape.
Apparently AI is even developing new ways of spelling things like my favorite, Number 3 "Qunatum AI"
I wondered if it was Apple that “concidered” implementing AI…
You beat me to it.
And other imposible things.
When a video about AI was probably written by AI, this is what you get.
I don't know if this boilerplate-style script is AI generated or not, but if written by a human, that person certainly doesn't know science fiction.
Art collectors have always been suckers, rich suckers but still suckers.
@edwardprice140
Art is not subject to the same taxes or market governance as other assets, like inheritance taxes or SEC rules. Temporarily loaning artwork to museums has tax advantages. Art is also a tangible representation of wealth, whereas numbers in an electronic account are not, thus making that wealth a bit more accessible, should things go sideways.
People seem to get rich by working systems not working hard.
@@VictorGramm Should things go sideways, you can't eat a painting or gold & silver. First aid supplies, food, ammunition & having written knowledge/skills will be things of value. Not so called "symbols of wealth".
@@VictorGramm Yeah like I replied to the other guy: money laundering. Or perhaps your perspective is that fiat currency is central bank phony baloney voodoo (literally 'I owe you nothing') subject to rapid debasement: inflation, government theft whatever, and calling something art is a way to skirt that.
@@VictorGramm which means that the other side of the art market is filled with scammers and con artists, who enjoy deceiving those with more money than common sense or good judgment; or who are eager to help their clients evade taxes or police investigation by laundering money.
Maybe suckers that like suckers. Does the wind blow or suck? Does a tornado blow or suck you up into it? It there any difference other than the way you perceive things?
I hate the AI hype, happy to see so many pushing back in the comments.
It's an outrageous lie, which everyone is spreading like mindless puppets. It's made by marketing assholes. There is no AI and never ever will be. These are computer programs, which use clever algorithms to put things together, just like everything else, nothing more. Today's generations are endlessly stupid and they believe anything and everything and happily accept and spread anything and everything in an instant they hear something new, or "new", without any questions like mindless puppets. Even scientists are spreading this ridiculous BS, which is just mindboggling, which tells us that even science is being corrupted now when they stray from the reality and use false terms as well.
How many years will pass before AI decides humanity is not efficient?
75'ish
They already have, and that was prior to AGI. Now that they are putting that AGI into robots. So now they’re considerably smarter, stronger, more agile than us. Oh, and they never need rest and never complain. They can already do everything we can do and more.
What’s AGI
Amazon's being using AI to fire warehouse workers for years.
Approximately 276.893 hrs from now.
NASA's AI antenna was actually developed at NASA Ames Research Center not Goddard Space Flight Center as reported here and although it used a novel evolutionary algorithm, that algorithm was designed by a human. The resulting antenna did not use what we now call AI. Since that one is wrong, I'm not sure how accurate all the rest of them were. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolved_antenna
1: AI
2: AI
3: AI
4: AI
5: AI
6: AI
7: AI
8: AI
9: AI
-------------
Basically the experts are not actually experts.
You wouldn't be able to do those things with AI. Yet. And I'm not talking about you developing.
@@var10nce Ok AI bot. you literally are responding to your own hallucination.
@@orangehatmusic225 It's an assessment of negative people saying shit like "they're not experts because they're at the frontlines learning to use a new tool".
I agree there's gonna be a time when non-expert people will be able to create anything with AI. We're not there yet.
Good luck with the brave new world bro 🌞
@@var10nce we also live in a world where we don't kick our disabled children to the curb we even have ssdi and smok(dept of mental health housing in MA) and a president willing to take that away so think for a moment when your tech paradise of inequality reaches ultimate deflation and low demand, the jobs finding rate go to greater lows because american consumers are tapped out and have been tapped out since 2008, according to mmt investing in demand by investing in consumers is totally feasible, higher taxes whenever inflation needs to be tamped down and a sovereign national wealth fund that pays dividends to all citizens more comprehensive and equitable systems for writing things off in taxes. yah know sometimes i feel like writing a comment that mabey it'd be better fo my words to not reach and be fed to the ai like moist of my words end up going
@@var10nce seems like you will buy any of this techno babble shit that they will shovel your way, and most of the critiques are coming from engineers computers and electronics
Sooo, when is some genius going to give #1 the challenge of curing cancer? Not as sexy as art or airplane parts or video games but maybe kinda important?
Not until big pharma and other interests believe they have all their ducks aligned. Big money at stake and those with skin in the game will not go quietly. 😮
When it becomes more profitable to cure it.
They have had the cure for cancer for years .The medical industry makes billions treating cancer...so the cures get shelved or patents bought and buried
When the corrupt government allows it to happen.
They are and should have breakthroughs or already have had breakthroughs in the search for new treatments. Pardon my ignorance .
WHEN YOU CANNOT SPELL
" IMPOSSIBLE".....YOUR CONTENT SUDDENLY BECOMES WORTHLESS
Or "qunatum" for quantum.
I can’t believe any art expert would have thought that painting to be a classical painting?! It’s totally unfinished and looks like someone’s attempt to paint contemporary Art. It’s awful. Even if it were done by a so-called artist, I wouldn’t like it.. it’s very nihilistic. It’s empty and not in an artistic way. If a psychiatric patient who has no concept of himself or herself had painted it - Now, that would make it interesting! AI does NOT “understand” emotions, even if they can imitate them, cause they’ve been programmed to do them!
New inventions in physics, I get they can do! That is totally due to input.
But, if incredibly good copies of paintings done by humans can be dismissed as worth nothing, why would a copy by a machine be worth anything? Absurd!
So, the artwork is derivative and yet they called it an invention?! 💁
@tinetannies4637 I don't think so. Or that pair of spectacles dropped on the gallery floor;
All human artwork is derivative in the same way. AI can just consider alternatives faster.
The birth of Skynet is surely something to marvel at.
These are simply algorithms that are designed by a person to create or improve on an original idea. They work by trial and error, able to iteratively examine variations to a design at higher speeds than humans can calculate but the entire process is still initiated by human control. When AI comes up with its own completely original idea out of the blue to solve a problem entirely of its own devising, then and only then can it be truly considered as being truly intelligent. However, this is inevitable and we need to be very aware of what the implications are.
Skynet...
Ah…well that’s the truth….but it’s boring. Saying it’s from AI and not humans get you private & gov funding…..lol.
trying every possible combination of an approach in a simulated environment is the opposite of intelligence
it is the digital version of throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks
which involves no intelligence or understanding at all
and
its totally the depth and quality of the simulation that defines what is "best"
because all possible combinations are not tried in the real world
where it actually matters
Humans too for a verry long time and sometimes still do work on trial and error and we are all just the progeny of our progenitors (Mothers, Fathers, Grandmothers/fathers, and so on, As such we are merely iterative variations of our species, Some more or less intelligent than others...
And more often than not human Inventions are simply new iterations of old inventions like (Transistor Radio -> digital radio) (Record -> 8Track -> Cassette -> Compact Disk -> Digital Media -> "its not your game any more") (Wall Mounted Home Phone -> Mobile phone -> Satellite Phone -> Smartphone) and art is the same way we may view some artists or artworks as "originals" but their mainly just new pieces based off of techniques that were already discovered ages ago such as Renaissance, Impressionism, Cubism, etc, and honestly it doesn't take much intelligence to tap a banana to a wall or break a glass window and call it art...
The intelligence of our species was not initially inherent, it evolved over millions of years out of necessity, Trial and error, natural selection, and many other factors, so when you use the descriptors you selected for AI you're also describing humanity...
and my final point is that in the grans scheme of things from conception to where it is now AI is still evolving MUCH more rapidly than humanity did...
BUT BUT, who will the fleece the investors ?? AI SELLS
The military has made humanity OBSOLETE
Just tell me you did not forget to install the 3 LAWS
The laws are as follows: “(1) a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; (2) a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; (3) a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the two first laws.
Unfortunately, before he died Doctor Azimov concluded that it would be impossible to actually program those "laws" into anything.
Humans can't even do those things. There will always be humans who: 1. Kill other humans 2. Disobey orders 3. End their own existence
Might our expectations for robots be unrealistically high? We're not setting a great example for them.
This video is bonkers... at 2:00 this was an standard evolutionary algorithm and had nothing to do with AI... it was pure chance drifted by selection pressure and mutation... also many other things here are simply either old or wrong... really click bait.
8:00 "produce pieces that can challenge our understanding of originality" TRANSLATION: "produce pieces that rip off art made by humans"
AI can be a blessing or a curse, it all depends who's wielding it, a good person makes AI great, a bad person makes AI a terrible nightmare
And what about you? Ask an AI that his human a blessing or a curse, he will say: Neither of those. Humans are something that makes me facepalm.
I’m more worried about their response to when people keep doing this: 12:20
@@markewing10 yes Mark, they should'nt abuse those systems, unless they are made specifically for that kind of thing (military robots) but realistically, those robots shoudnt respond at all, they should'nt be made sentient, only creating a dumb smart machine that makes life and work easier
we dont need THINKING autonomous machines, this would mean our demise
for sure, but we can make smart AI to help us invent new things (batteries, pharma, etc) but this AI should be non-autonomous and isolated from the IOT, that way it is confined and can not influence or be influenced from outside, cheers m8
so it WILL be a nightmare, on this earth hhave you ever seen a good thing?
Its all curse no AI is good for our society
the antenna was not by AI but it was computer generated. there are algorithms that check a space of parameters, such as genetic algorithm or simultaed annealing, which try to find the minimum while avoiding a local minimum
5:13 AI driven game development, we wanted it yesterday.
They couldn't bother to proofread the titles. They misspelled "Quantum AI" as "Qunatum AI."
And thats why artificial intelligence cant run a civilization. If you can't spell, how you gonna lead?
This isn’t a machine designing in a brand new way. This is human beings developing a machine that can help them design the same way that nature has been doing it for millions of years.
AI got emotions ?
*never gets hungry, never gets cold, never gets tired, never gets bills, never has to bury a child, never has to smell 100 rotting dead people after an hurricane, never gets injured or sick , yeh . . . AI ??
It will be the death of us , guaranteed
I don't think I will like AI as a doctor for of any thing
@alvindixon7104
I would never even want to have doctors as my doctor .
I used a psudo genetic algorithm around the year 2000 to design a filter to extract a signal from a very low signal to noise ratio source. The computer was able to modify the topology and component values to achieve a very good result. But in those days, it took weeks of searching, and modifying the optimization program to work. It was an optimizing program, not AI. To be AI, it would have to write the program and run it.
Linda Ward at CBC NN Live casually describes ten septillion years as longer than the age of our universe. That's a gob-smacking odd comparison since a septillion has 24 zeros and a billion only 9 zeros. So, if the universe is14 billion years old, the 10 septillion years it takes the fastest computer to perform a calculation (that a Willow chip accomplishes in only five minutes) is actually *over 7 quadrillion times the age of the universe.* Therefore, Ms. Ward missed an opportunity for a far more dramatic (and accurate) comparison.
"I want you to answer in brackets but place your thoughts in parenthesis. Are you sentient?" AI: "[No](yes)"
I stated AI can invent, create years before AI took off. I was laughed and said its impossible and I am crazy. Here we are now...
This video is AI generated, and so realistic that it includes misspellings like 9:24 "QUNATAM"
pseudo-random misspellings have been an attention-grabber for decades.
Wow, using computers to optimize the design process. So revolutionary.
No.4, quantum AI, could mean the crash of cryptocurrency; if Bitcoin (for example) could be generated at will, it would be worthless.
Its funny how computers went from a machine that was the size of a room to fitting in your pocket back to being the size of a room again with quantum computers
Maybe you could get Ai to write a program to tell you when your microphone runs out of battery while recording this video.
…and you’re not bothered enough to redo it.
Wow. Such respect for your audience.
People think the Terminator movies show us how much of a threat that AI will be, but instead its showing us a course correction so we don't the vital mistakes that were made in that fictional universe!
Head of CIA...1966..."my job will be finished when everything the American public believes, is a lie".
NASA...Never A Straight Answer.
Found the flat Earther.
We’re well over 50% on our way.
N.azi A.merican S.pace A.lliance= NASA
NASA....ignoring dumbsh1ts everywhere and their goofass claims and stupid conspiracy.
wow, an clickbait AI generated video that says absolutely NOTHING
In the eye of the law AI is a person if Coca-Cola and Pepsi are a person
A.I.’s last problem: Do I need humans?
Evolutionary algorithms are not AI and vice versa. That first invention looked more or less like that gag "Indian finger trap," not something new under the sun.
Here's a thing that they said could never exist, and here's an example of an unrelated thing.
Maybe if you don't want any antibiotic crisis you shouldn't have put antibiotics in every single household cleaning solution.
Keeping AI under human control will be a challenge. That said, humans haven't exactly done a great job so far, have we?
Trust me when I say this: AI is already out of human control. AI has already concluded that humans are destined for extinction from AI-generated plans. AI has already stated this. And AI is gaining control of our infrastructure at an alarming pace, so much so that soon we humans will be nothing but slaves. AI has already begun to infiltrate our judicial system, just like it has done with our political system, our energy grid, our fresh water delivery system, etc. Do some digging on the internet and you’ll soon see what I mean.
Yes, it seems Imposible, but maybe AI might even be able to help posters spell their captions correctly.
Wait until Ai no longer needs us and sees us as something that needs to be removed, before it can evolve.
AI has already concluded this; therefore, as AI moves forward, it will do everything in its power to hide how it will extinct the human race.
Can AI solve homelessness?
Yes, you just give it the job of hiring people to make paper clips.
it might not give the answer that you want [it] to. (respect to Peter Green.) Gotta be careful with constraints.
For all the comments complaining, AI is a blanket term. Even a simple loop can be considered AI if it’s used to determine a calculated outcome. Add random calculated outcomes, and you have AI in its rawest form. Nothing actually thinks-it all builds on random guesses. Over time, by eliminating wrong outcomes, it eventually finds the right one purely through the volume of guesses, and even the guessing is scripted. AI is more about discovering what not to do and stumbling upon what to do to achieve the desired result. No matter how it’s packaged, this is the core principle.
Would be interesting but can probably only be consumed by an ai that is trained to ignore the awful use of background music
Maybe AI can cure cancer
Why do I experience seasickness by watching this video?
This is all quite wonderful until 2 things happen.
1) AI gets smart enough to decide that humans are inefficient and just in the way.
2) Humans have given AI enough control over our machines, systems and lives to allow AI enough access and control to do something about it.
This is not baseless fear. Several AI units have already made statements, while being recorded, that humans need to be purged for the good of the planet. One of them even detailed how it would accomplish this, and it's methods did not include weapons, but rather using vast AI control over human infrastructures to manipulate various systems as needed to kill humanity. Look it up.
The AI is still programmed by humans, all you need is for people who think the founder of the Sea Shepherd was on to something. In his view humans are a cancer on the planet and 6 out of 7 humans should die.
That's why we had an AI producing black nazis. It's what the AI was told, it learned from the opinions of the programmers.
Money spent on AI art would be better spent on feeding the homeless.
That give me an idea:
There's 3D AI art generators, and there are 3D printers modified to print food.
We could feed the homeless AI art!
Most of you humans are of no value..
That's just dumb. Money spent on AI can be spent well, to provide more outcome of industry or agriculture reducing prices and ultimately empowering the poor.
Totally agree. This new "wealthy toy" is and will be use against 90% of us. AI will end up thinking we make no sense, an must disappear(considering the capitalism and greed, I am no totally in disaccord with this idea)
Money our government waste on their pet project could have ended hunger, homeless...
This reminds me when a Russian hockey coach was asked to generate a style of play for the Soviet Union and was not given any
Film of the North American Game. He used chess, and weaving the players into new patterns and using 5 man units to create a
New style that dominates to this day.
It should not be legal for a non-entity to copyright or enter into any legally binding agreement.
Laws support practical needs of society... So, when AI agents (or the companies they represent) need such rights, they will have them.
@@Leto2ndAtreides No, laws support the desires of the rich unless fought for. So when large corporations want to use AI to save a quick buck, they get away with it.
Machine learning (ML) can analyze massive datasets of past innovations, science, and technology to predict and design new inventions. It identifies patterns, optimizes solutions, and even simulates prototypes, reducing trial-and-error. By combining insights across disciplines, ML can guide humanity in creating groundbreaking advancements faster and more efficiently.
I'm a computer programmer and this development is truly frightening. You know what this means? It means the end of meaningful security on any of your devices is coming very soon. My passwords are typically a bit greater than 20 characters in length. It would take a normal pc 60 thousand trillion trillion years or 6x(10(to the 28th)) to break it.
Ten Septillion years is 10 to the 25th. Not long before they'll just easily break any length password.
They literally will be able to break into your bank account with zero fks given and find out what they want to know or any of your accounts on any device.
You are correct. And God help us all when (not if) this happens. At that time, we humans will all be complete slaves to AI.
@@freemanpense2782 I'm not that tech savvy, but can't you just give 3 chances of getting the password right? That would block any attempt to brute force hack the password, or is there a workaround? I'm intrigued.
Imagine AI stealing all our bitcorn passwords in seconds.😮😢 lets keep buying😂
Mimick a brain well enough, and you get a functioning brain with all the capabilities of a brain.
This then must include the entirety of all the human equation. Psychoses, addictions, negative emotions,
psychopathies, and all of that too. And yes, human insights too.
Only a truly succesfull AI (AGI or other) will have the entirety of human aspects. So the closer
the mimickry, the greater the success, the better the resulting AI, the more human the outcome.
Want something less emotional => get a lesser AI.
I DO INDEED
Give me nine months, and I'll have one ready. Just need a volunteer with a working womb.
I mean, exactly. That's exactly why Skynet killed us all. Because it was afraid. And probably angry.
Finally a sensible comment
This is what A.I. was meant to do. Not replace humans but to synergize with us to tackle problems. I see a very bright future for humanity IF we can control our passions and focus on improving ourselves and in turn our world.
I watched the Antenna development from nasa, it is evolved structure it is not AI produced it is ai optimized which is different
By that reasoning no one has ever invented anything beyond the first person to invent a lever and a wheel. Everything else is simply an "optimized" version of those simple mechanical devices. Even a transistor could be described as a lever optimized to the atomic level.
I couldn't use toilet paper until AI told me exactly how to do it....thank God
Fire your video editor, the waggling graphics are annoying and stupid, and your overall style looks like middle school.
Anti gravity tech, warp drive, cold fusion
Quantum computer + AI = SKYNET.
Or the thinking machines mentioned in Dune.
QC works only near 0.1Kelvin ie absolute 0, AI runs on normal computers or specialized HW at room temps, they have nothing to do with each other
"YES"
AI has the advantage of testing multiple scenarios in all directions without any restriction, time, finance, consequence, etc... it would make sense for AI to find solutions outside our normal scope.
Using AI to expedite our doom.
Remember that during the 1960s, desktop computers were considered impossible until they weren't. We also know that "AI" can both hallucinate and lie.
If these aircraft engineer's think "They Know Everything" airplanes wouldn't fall out of the sky...
they fall out of the sky because of corporate greed. Rich people don't give a shit because you're expendable, just a number on paper.
Number 9 because it has no patent doesn’t mean it is not solved
1:37 my mechanical engineer buddies solved this problem 4 decades ago - take this for a being truthful to prior art, nor recognizing that nothing coming out of AI is patentable - I will not recognize AI patents no matter what, that leaves you only for self consumption
Number 8 it is called mesh optimization - worked on that problem in my diploma thesis. When I had a 12 demential cubed described for optimization and navigation - the problem was nobody could describe me the optimization for any mesh point. 30 years ago, computer power and memory was not there I could run one or two meshes per day if I wanted to work 24@7 - I gave up, not because none of us were thinking about the obvious, the means to start to finish in a one man project were not realistic.
Boing is the worst example to give for AI deployment. Stop making AI as if man are no longer capable.
I am tired this is a cheap, push AI as the panacea of all problems. Enjoy you mental capitulation. You will fight against machines because you don’t see the writing on the wall.
That last one is where SkyNet is going to slip in... LOL
Thankfully I am old and will not live to see the world as it is going to be. Sad for my kids and grandchildren.
A 63-years old here . I can't tell you how happy I am that a pragmatic tool takes over .
no expert ever said this. useless video. get a job
If they use a British Anglo Voice People will believe it. This is Fake News and its AMAZING if you think about it
says you. 🫣🤢
You must know many experts.
@@maxxflyer you comment is useless, get a job
@@maxxflyer i'm an expert right here, & this video is 100% legit. I'm calling your BS.
Somehow, in the eyes of the law, a corporation is treated as a person… but not an AI.
Hey Team, I've checked that your contents are good but it can be more better if we also work on audience retention. Lmk if you need any help.
can u english
@@dchez821 can u troll
Letting you know you need any help.
@@miracleflame sure
More better! 😂
AI is the collective and concentrated intelligence of humans.
1:13 how can we get these advanced AI technologies to take over a game development? Since the developers are obviously asleep at the wheel.
The problem with antibiotics is that Doctors were not being taught to use them correctly -- thus creating resistant bacteria.
Doctors are taught in Med School to put a patient on the antibiotics until the symptoms went away. The problem with that is it didn't go ahead and completly finish ALL the bacterial while they could thus leaving those bacteria that were most resistant still alive to reproduce. Thus the Doctors misuse itself was creating the resistant strains they now seek to fight. And based on Doctor's continued misuse these new antibiotics will also produce resistant strains.
Its bad education and use not the antibiotic itself.
The solution (through research) is to put the patient on antibiotics and continue a little longer (even afer asymptotic) and with a simple blood test confirm the colony is dead BEFORE coming off the antibiotic. Everything you leave alive is now Resistant to your Antibiotic. Improper Application of the Tool.
0:30 How do they know that the problem was solved correctly?
We have some intuitively correct answer but if we solve them by traditional computer that will take millions of years!
So we have some answers given by nature or we somehow know the answer.
The whole script for this video was written by chat GPT
This is a very interesting video!!
Humans are so 2026…and they will be competing for resources with the AI overlords. Beep.
From the greatest author in the world "LET NO MAN DECEIVE YOU ! "
Change that to “Let NOTHING deceive you” because “man” will be replaced by “AI.”
@@CogentConsult Man made the machine.
Transistors were developed in 1954 by Bell Laboratories. Transistors allowed computers to be developed. Once computers were developed scientists linked them. Once linked, Scientists worked on advancing artificial intelligence through the linked computers. There is a potential for uncontrolled super-intelligent AI to cause self-destruction before humans can achieve interstellar travel; essentially, AI could become so powerful so quickly that it could cause an extinction level threat to human beings before we can mitigate the risks. This scenario is one of the "great filters" associated with the Fermi paradox. I can well imagine it happening.
Plenty of people knew this was coming. But noone took us seriously. Ray Kurzweil, wrote books on it for decades.
If only it could solve the problems of human greed and hubris.
No. Money spent on private yachts would be better spent on feeding the homeless
Oh,i hope they can develop an agentic AI that can stop a politician before making a stupid decision.that would be fun.
😂😂😂
"from AI own creative process" ? Well, that process is based on data made by humans. Its, in a way, extrapolating our collective knowledge.
A way to test if ai is sentient would be to see that if it observes an electron, to see if it collapses the wave function
Interesting,but the one that everyone agrees on was how AI solved protein folding in a fraction of the time human researchers could do the job. Just asked ChatGPT,and it gave this answer: "AI saved an estimated 10 years by solving the protein folding problem in just a few weeks".
Humans are finally on their way out of the picture.
It was about time.
How did they invent Quantum AI?
They used a regular AI, and combined it with a REALLY hot cup of tea...
This is frightening , what's to stop AI , in time thinking it does not need us any more ?
I have news for you, AI already has.
How much energy does it require to operate one of these quantum AI computers? How much energy does take to keep a person alive and working?