China People's Armed Police Urban Combat

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @taiwanstillisntacountry
    @taiwanstillisntacountry 2 дні тому +26

    But USA has most experience in war.
    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    In fleeing the battle-field

    • @normanfung7124
      @normanfung7124 2 дні тому +15

      They do. Decades of experience. Bullying small nations.

    • @paulsteaven
      @paulsteaven 2 дні тому

      American doctrine of fleeing is so good no wonder why Chinese peacekeepers in South Sudan adapted it and fled en masse.

    • @BITStudioCode
      @BITStudioCode 2 дні тому +2

      Partially true, the US’s wars they have thought tested out some weapons, but not in conditions that they will be met with against a superpower or any developed country like china. In the countries that the US have fought in those country do not have robust air defenses, electronic warfare kill webs, or any sort of systematic data link system that can relay information to every unit of their army to make those military machines effective. Just think about it, does a single M1A2SEP alone on a battlefield have the same capabilities and effectiveness as one that has a drone flying in front of it to relay combat information and air defenses to eliminate threats in the air. One example is EW warfare, the US has only a couple battle tested weapons that has been put under severe Electronic interference and proving to work just as well. This is very significant because as you can see in the war Ukraine, Russia’s weapons are advanced but only if it was used in the optimal conditions. Like the a50U, the range of detection for targets decreases once there is active jamming, and Russia, not having a plane/network to counter this kind of EW measure, suffers heavy losses of the A50U. One of the A50u’s been shot down by its own air defenses. So I believe china doesn’t have that much of a shortcoming in battle tested weapons.

    • @Americaisgreat12
      @Americaisgreat12 2 дні тому

      ​@BITStudioCodeummm Ukraine war they sent them some of there best weapons😂

    • @Americaisgreat12
      @Americaisgreat12 2 дні тому

      ​@@normanfung7124what what wars have china been in? The Vietnam War were they got beat while have overwhelming forces and Korean War when united Nation troops have been exhausted 😂

  • @BengalLancer
    @BengalLancer 2 дні тому +15

    Chinese ground forces aviation has increased its capabilities. Would you be able to do an assessment anytime soon? With new Chinese copies of Blackhawks becoming more popular now, it is more of a western styled Army aviation group rather than a Russian style one

  • @FELIPEFODAOBR12
    @FELIPEFODAOBR12 2 дні тому +9

    Thats a special police unit, not he army, so thats the chinese version of the brazilian BOPE (police force)

    • @坐著火車去台灣
      @坐著火車去台灣 2 дні тому +8

      也不算特警警察,中国警察属于公务员队伍。而中国武警属于兵役制。有点像美国国民警卫队,主要对内反恐、防暴的内卫部队。受中央军委指挥,不听从政府公务员指挥。

    • @FELIPEFODAOBR12
      @FELIPEFODAOBR12 2 дні тому +1

      @@坐著火車去台灣 thats a little bit confusing, so they have two type of police forces ? What does the chinese ''civil police '' special forces are like ?

    • @alexnderrrthewoke4479
      @alexnderrrthewoke4479 2 дні тому

      Whats confusing about it? Its same way as american police force. ​@FELIPEFODAOBR12

    • @HeidiKernstad
      @HeidiKernstad 2 дні тому

      @@FELIPEFODAOBR12People’s Armed Police is a paramilitary civil defense group that falls under the Central Military Commision. Their duties are
      1. Riot control (they have specialized units for riot control)
      2. Maritime patrol (Chinese People's Armed Police Force Coast Guard Corps aka China Coast Guard)
      3. Internal security (capturing foreign agents, spies, enemies of the state)
      4. Counter insurgency / Counter terrorism (Snow Wolf Commando Unit and SPU similar to BOPE)
      5. Disaster response (they have trained rescue personnel and aviation units to respond to earthquakes/floods/fires)
      6. Supporting the People’s Liberation Army in the event of a war
      It is a huge organization with 1.5 million personnel.
      People’s Police is the regular civil police. They take care of traffic, enforce the law, arrest criminals, guard airports, etc. Regular officers are armed with just CS spray and baton. Handguns are issued if needed. People’s Police have their own “tactical units” which is the equivalent of a SWAT team.

    • @坐著火車去台灣
      @坐著火車去台灣 2 дні тому

      @@FELIPEFODAOBR12 中国人口众多,地方政府管理城市的公安局(警察局)下属多种警察,比如交通警察、社区警察(派出所)、刑事警察、特警警察等,他们只有刑事警察和特警警察才配发枪械(这是重点)。他们接受地方政府执政官调遣,属于政府纪律部队。特警警察只装备轻型防暴车辆和轻兵器,如SWAT一样,处理城市和周边一般暴力事件和突发事件。
      而中国武装警察(武警),属于军队编制,采取军队式管理,属于“中国武装力量重要组成部分”,由中央军委领导。负责中国国内救灾、反恐、重要设施守护、押解、镇暴、使领馆保卫等任务。装备有中型轮式步战车、机炮、榴弹枪、机枪等重武器,类似某些国家的国民警卫队。
      所以两者的任务分工不同,针对的犯罪分子危险程度不同。
      同时他们隶属不同机构,组织模式也不同。
      baike.baidu.com/item/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E6%AD%A6%E8%A3%85%E8%AD%A6%E5%AF%9F%E9%83%A8%E9%98%9F/238836?fr=ge_ala
      百科资料

  • @James-cq2bj
    @James-cq2bj 9 годин тому

    PAP is basically the Chinese national guard equivalent if I’m not wrong

  • @icebearliu6403
    @icebearliu6403 2 дні тому

    that thing at 1:26 is scope?

  • @BITStudioCode
    @BITStudioCode 2 дні тому +2

    This is anti-terrorism training right? Seems like they were practicing hostage extraction or something.

    • @frankfleming1103
      @frankfleming1103 2 дні тому +2

      Yes, they are armed police, that is the police with light weapons. normal police has no weapons

    • @BITStudioCode
      @BITStudioCode 13 годин тому +1

      @@frankfleming1103 Equivalent to swat in the US?

  • @fatpajama
    @fatpajama 2 дні тому

    they not PLA mate, they are civil enforcements

  • @paulsteaven
    @paulsteaven 2 дні тому +3

    That insignia on that Z-20 Copyhawk looks different from the one PLA uses, is it the Chinese police?

  • @DorJinTan
    @DorJinTan 2 дні тому +7

    Plot twist; they're robots!

  • @asimjabbar8445
    @asimjabbar8445 2 дні тому +1

    I like the "cheen Hawk" or "red hawk" helicopter 🚁 in the thumbnail 😜

  • @atlasx5947
    @atlasx5947 2 дні тому

    我擦嘞,头一次见真实拆弹,虽然也是模拟的😂

  • @thomas_jay
    @thomas_jay 2 дні тому

    What's the name of that movie?

  • @katoy9976
    @katoy9976 День тому

    😎🇨🇳🐲💪

  • @alfredmakaveli6622
    @alfredmakaveli6622 2 дні тому

    Looking good

  • @ChipChat1493
    @ChipChat1493 2 дні тому

    These Army police soldiers sorely need real combat experience. I guess since the ETIM intends to come to China, it would be a good test.

  • @lars4953
    @lars4953 2 дні тому +1

    That's how they engage civilians?

    • @akosyoutub
      @akosyoutub 2 дні тому

      US police is against civilians as well... idiot...

    • @VashtheStampede007
      @VashtheStampede007 2 дні тому +3

      That's how they engage trolls

    • @lars4953
      @lars4953 День тому

      @@VashtheStampede007 And then everyone a troll who isn't in line...

    • @VashtheStampede007
      @VashtheStampede007 День тому

      @@lars4953 nah, trolls actively start smearing. Especially the paid ones from Operation Earnest Voice, and DPP 1450 from Chinese Taipei

    • @VashtheStampede007
      @VashtheStampede007 День тому

      @@lars4953 nope, just u

  • @ld871111
    @ld871111 2 дні тому +1

    Not digging the tight formation and bunching up in an age of drones. They should reconsider their attack formations, especially when TIP in Syria is known to have drone operators.

    • @jhdsfalsjhdfjashdkhvjfldld8301
      @jhdsfalsjhdfjashdkhvjfldld8301 2 дні тому +5

      Fpv drones are more of a problem in open spaces, look at ukraine. In urban warfare you have lots of more important stuff to worry about

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 2 дні тому +7

      China is world biggest manufacturer industry of drones 😂😂😂😂

    • @HeidiKernstad
      @HeidiKernstad 2 дні тому

      You are right. The last time the CIA and Turks armed the jihadi Weegers, they didn’t give them any drones.
      Now that Syria has fallen, no doubt the Weegers who have vowed to come back and “liberate” Eastern China from China will have drones in their arsenal.
      People’s armed police should prepare.

    • @freedumb_3.0
      @freedumb_3.0 2 дні тому

      It's not training for war. This is a police training against US sponsor terrorists.

    • @BITStudioCode
      @BITStudioCode 2 дні тому

      True but also not true, in urban scenarios drones are less effective because there is more cover and places to hide. What is scary is when you are in an open area and suddenly two drones are approaching fast and you have nowhere to hide.

  • @HarleyJames-j2j
    @HarleyJames-j2j 2 дні тому +2

    American wannabes 😂
    But good try out

    • @tonypeterson5316
      @tonypeterson5316 2 дні тому +1

      How r they American wannabes if they don't start wars around the world?

    • @felisasininus1784
      @felisasininus1784 2 дні тому +10

      You wanna go for Korean War 2 and experience the same PTSD your grandpa had? 😂
      This time China has hypersonic drones and you don't even have operational missiles yet.

    • @User1717ww
      @User1717ww 2 дні тому +5

      @@felisasininus1784 they always forget about the Korean War. They like to argue that China had the numbers advantage but they like to ignore that China also had a huge weapons and tech disadvantage...

    • @freedumb_3.0
      @freedumb_3.0 2 дні тому

      ​​​​@@User1717ww that's how they cope. They like to pretend that the 700k men strong South Korean army didn't exist. Nor did the 60k UK, 30k Canadian and the 20k Australian army. And all the other UN countries that were roped into this war. They like to pretend that it was 300k Americans against 1.5m Chinese. It was such a resounding defeat for America that despite it being on the scale of WW2, America pretended it didn't exist.

    • @BITStudioCode
      @BITStudioCode 2 дні тому +2

      @@User1717ww Yep, while the Americans and South Koreans fought with tanks, artillery, and air superiority, the Chinese fought with grenades, shoulder fired rockets, and pure motivation while staying alive by using as little food as possible. Not mentioning some battles where the Chinese held their positions with a few dozen men against the American armored regiments and artillery units. It’s a true marvel that China actually defended against the Americans crossing the 38th parallel.